Xiaflex Drug Information
Generic name: COLLAGENASE CLOSTRIDIUM HISTOLYTICUM
Uses of Xiaflex
is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with Dupuytren’s contracture with a palpable cord. XIAFLEX is indicated for the treatment of adult men with Peyronie’s disease with a palpable plaque and curvature deformity of at least 30 degrees at the start of therapy. XIAFLEX is a combination of bacterial collagenases indicated for: The treatment of adult patients with Dupuytren’s contracture with a palpable cord The treatment of adult men with Peyronie’s disease with a palpable plaque and curvature deformity of at least 30 degrees at the start of therapy
Dosage & Administration of Xiaflex
| 1 The reconstituted XIAFLEX solution to be used in the intralesional injection contains 0.58 mg of XIAFLEX. Note: The entire reconstituted XIAFLEX solution contains 0.9 mg of XIAFLEX. Reconstituted XIAFLEX solution remaining in the vial after the injection should be discarded. | |
|---|---|
| Volume | 0.39 mL |
| Volume | 0.25 mL |
Side Effects of Xiaflex
Clinical Studies Experience in Patients with Dupuytren’s Contracture
Because clinical studies are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical studies of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical studies of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Out of 1082 patients who received 0.58 mg of XIAFLEX in the controlled and uncontrolled portions of the XIAFLEX studies (2630 XIAFLEX injections), 3 (0.3%) patients had a flexor tendon rupture of the treated finger within 7 days of the injection. The data described below are based on two pooled randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials through Day 90 in patients with Dupuytren’s contracture (Studies 1 and 2). In these trials, patients were treated with up to 3 injections of 0.58 mg of XIAFLEX or placebo with approximately 4-week intervals between injections and the patients had finger extension procedures the day after injection, if needed, to facilitate disruption of the cord . These trials were comprised of 374 patients of whom 249 and 125 received 0.58 mg of XIAFLEX and placebo, respectively.
The mean age was 63 years, 80% were male and 20% were female, and 100% were white. In the placebo-controlled portions of Studies 1 and 2 through Day 90, 98% and 51% of XIAFLEX-treated and placebo-treated patients had an adverse reaction after up to 3 injections, respectively. Over 95% of XIAFLEX-treated patients had an adverse reaction of the injected extremity after up to 3 injections.
Approximately 81% of these local reactions resolved without intervention within 4 weeks of XIAFLEX injections. The adverse reaction profile was similar for each injection, regardless of the number of injections administered. However, the incidence of pruritus increased with more injections.
The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (≥ 25%) in the XIAFLEX clinical trials in patients with Dupuytren’s contracture included edema peripheral (mostly swelling of the injected hand), contusion, injection site hemorrhage, injection site reaction, and pain in the treated extremity. Table 3 shows the incidence of adverse reactions that were reported in greater than or equal to 5% of XIAFLEX-treated patients and at a frequency greater than placebo-treated patients after up to 3 injections in the pooled placebo-controlled trials through Day 90 (Studies 1 and 2). Table 3. Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥ 5% of XIAFLEX-Treated Patients with Dupuytren’s Contracture and at a Greater Incidence than Placebo in the Placebo-Controlled Trials Through Day 90 After Up to 3 Injections a Most of these events were swelling of the injected hand. b Includes the terms: contusion (any body system) and ecchymosis. c Includes the terms: injection site reaction, injection site erythema, injection site inflammation, injection site irritation, injection site pain, and injection site warmth. d Includes the terms: injection site swelling and injection site edema. e Includes the terms: pruritus and injection site pruritus. f Includes the terms: lymphadenopathy and axillary mass. Adverse Reaction XIAFLEX N=249 Placebo N=125 All Adverse Reactions 98% 51% Edema peripheral a 73% 5% Contusion b 70% 3% Injection site hemorrhage 38% 3% Injection site reaction c 35% 6% Pain in extremity 35% 4% Tenderness 24% 0% Injection site swelling d 24% 6% Pruritus e 15% 1% Lymphadenopathy f 13% 0% Skin laceration 9% 0% Lymph node pain 8% 0% Erythema 6% 0% Axillary pain 6% 0% Some patients developed vasovagal syncope after finger extension procedures.
The safety of two concurrent injections of XIAFLEX 0.58 mg into Dupuytren’s cords in the same hand was evaluated in a historically-controlled, open-label multi-center trial in 715 adult subjects with Dupuytren’s contracture (Study 3). In Study 3, finger extension procedures were performed approximately 24 to 72 hours after injection. The patient demographics were similar to Studies 1 and 2. Out of 715 patients who received two concurrent injections of XIAFLEX 0.58 mg in the same hand (1450 XIAFLEX injections) in Study 3, one (0.1%) patient experienced a tendon rupture of the treated finger within 3 days of the injection. Table 4 shows the incidence of adverse reactions that were reported in greater than or equal to 5% of XIAFLEX-treated patients after two concurrent injections of XIAFLEX in the same hand through Day 60 in Study 3. Table 4. Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥5.0% of Subjects Who Received Two Concurrent Injections of XIAFLEX in Study 3 Adverse Reaction XIAFLEX N=715 Subjects with ≥1 adverse reaction 95% Edema peripheral 77% Contusion 59% Pain in extremity 51% Laceration 22% Pruritus 15% Injection site pain 14% Lymphadenopathy 13% Blood blister 12% Injection site hematoma 8% Axillary pain 7% Injection site hemorrhage 6% Injection site swelling 5% Ecchymosis 5% Safety of Retreatment of Recurrent Contractures An observational, open-label study was conducted in subjects who had participated in XIAFLEX clinical trials for Dupuytren’s contracture (Study 4). A subset of patients who had recurrence of contracture in a joint that was previously successfully treated with XIAFLEX in Study 4 were retreated (Study 5). No new safety signals were identified among subjects who were retreated with XIAFLEX.
Clinical Studies Experience in Patients with Peyronie’s Disease
Because clinical studies are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical studies of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical studies of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. In the controlled and uncontrolled clinical studies of XIAFLEX in Peyronie’s disease, 1044 patients received a total of 7466 XIAFLEX injections. Corporal Rupture and Other Serious Penile Injury Corporal rupture was reported as an adverse reaction after XIAFLEX injections in 5 of 1044 (0.5%) XIAFLEX treated patients.
In other XIAFLEX-treated patients (9 of 1044; 0.9%), a combination of penile ecchymoses or hematoma, sudden penile detumescence, and/or a penile “popping” sound or sensation was reported, and in these cases, a diagnosis of corporal rupture cannot be excluded. These patients were managed without surgical intervention, but the long-term consequences are unknown. Severe penile hematoma was also reported as an adverse reaction in 39 of 1044 patients (3.7%) in the controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials in Peyronie’s disease.
The data described below are based on two identical, pooled, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials through Day 365 in patients with Peyronie’s disease (Studies 1 and 2). These trials included 832 patients of whom 551 and 281 received XIAFLEX and placebo, respectively. In these trials, patients were given up to 4 treatment cycles of XIAFLEX or placebo. In each cycle, two injections of XIAFLEX or two injections of placebo were administered 1 to 3 days apart.
A penile modeling procedure was performed at the study site on patients 1 to 3 days after the second injection of the cycle. The treatment cycle was repeated at approximately 6-week intervals up to 3 additional times, for a maximum of 8 total injection procedures and 4 total modeling procedures. The majority of Peyronie’s patients experienced at least one adverse reaction (92% XIAFLEX-treated patients, 61% placebo-treated). Most adverse reactions were local events of the penis and groin and the majority of these events were of mild or moderate severity, and most (79%) resolved within 14 days of the injection.
The adverse reaction profile was similar after each injection, regardless of the number of injections administered. The most frequently reported adverse drug reactions (≥ 25%) in the XIAFLEX clinical trials in patients with Peyronie’s disease were penile hematoma, penile swelling, and penile pain. Table 5 shows the incidence of adverse reactions that were reported in greater than or equal to 1% of XIAFLEX-treated patients and at a frequency greater than placebo-treated patients after up to 8 injections in the pooled placebo-controlled trials through Day 365. Table 5. Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥ 1% of XIAFLEX-Treated Patients with Peyronie’s disease and at a Greater Incidence than Placebo After Up to Four Treatment Cycles in Studies 1 and 2 Combined a Includes: injection site hematoma and penile hematoma were reported with the verbatim term of penile bruising or injection site bruising in 87% of subjects. b Includes: injection site swelling, penile edema, penile swelling, local swelling, scrotal swelling, and injection site edema. c Includes: injection site pain, penile pain, and injection site discomfort. d Includes: contusion, ecchymoses, penile hemorrhage, and injection site hemorrhage.
Adverse Reaction XIAFLEX N=551 Placebo N=281 All Adverse Reactions 84.2% 36.3% Penile hematoma a 65.5% 19.2% Penile swelling b 55.0% 3.2% Penile pain c 45.4% 9.3% Penile ecchymoses d 14.5% 6.8% Blood blister 4.5% 0 Penile blister 3.3% 0 Pruritus genital 3.1% 0 Painful erection 2.9% 0 Erectile dysfunction 1.8% 0.4% Skin discoloration 1.8% 0 Procedural pain 1.6% 0.7% Injection site vesicles 1.3% 0 Localized edema 1.3% 0 Dyspareunia 1.1% 0 Injection site pruritus 1.1% 0 Nodule 1.1% 0 Suprapubic pain 1.1% 0 Severe penile hematoma or severe injection site hematoma were reported in 33/551 (6.0%) of XIAFLEX-treated patients and 0/281 (0%) of placebo-treated patients, in Studies 1 and 2 combined. Reports of penile “popping” sounds or sensations A popping noise or popping sensation in the penis, sometimes described as “snapping” or “cracking”, and sometimes accompanied by detumescence, hematoma and/or pain, were reported in 73/551 (13.2%) XIAFLEX-treated patients and 1/281 (0.3%) placebo-treated patients. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the incidence of adverse events following treatment with XIAFLEX based on the severity of baseline erectile dysfunction or concomitant phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor use.
XIAFLEX was not associated with shortening of penile length in clinical trials in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease.
Immunogenicity During clinical studies in Dupuytren’s contracture and Peyronie’s disease, patients were
tested at multiple time points for antibodies to the protein components of XIAFLEX (AUX-I and AUX-II). In the Dupuytren’s contracture clinical studies (Studies 1 and 2), at 30 days post the first injection of XIAFLEX 0.58 mg, 92% of patients had antibodies against AUX-I detected and 86% of patients had antibodies against AUX-II detected. After the fourth injection of XIAFLEX, every XIAFLEX-treated patient developed high titers of antibodies to both AUX-I and AUX-II. After 5 years more than 90% of patients remained seropositive for anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II antibody (Study 4). Neutralizing antibodies were assayed for all patients in Study 1. Neutralizing antibodies to AUX-I or AUX-II, were detected in 10% and 21%, respectively, of patients treated with XIAFLEX. Among patients in Study 3 who reported no prior exposure to XIAFLEX, 97% of patients had antibodies against AUX-I and AUX-II after two concurrent doses of XIAFLEX 0.58 mg (total dose of 1.16 mg) in the same hand. In Study 5, treatment of recurrent contractures with XIAFLEX resulted in similar immunogenicity results as seen in Studies 1 and 2. In the Peyronie’s disease clinical studies, at 6 weeks after the first treatment cycle of XIAFLEX 0.58 mg, approximately 75% of patients had antibodies against AUX-I and approximately 55% of patients had antibodies against AUX-II. Six weeks after the eighth injection (fourth treatment cycle) of XIAFLEX, >99% of XIAFLEX-treated patients developed high titers of antibodies to both AUX-I and AUX-II. Neutralizing antibodies were assayed for a subset of 70 samples selected to be representative of high and low titer binding antibody responses at Week 12 of treatment.
For each subject in whom a Week 12 sample was selected, the corresponding Week 6, 18, 24, and 52 samples were assayed if they were also binding antibody positive. Neutralizing antibodies to AUX-I or AUX-II, were detected in 60% and 51.8%, respectively, of patients tested. In patients treated for these two indications, there was no apparent correlation of antibody frequency, antibody titers, or neutralizing status to clinical response or adverse reactions.
Since the protein components in XIAFLEX (AUX-I and AUX-II) have some sequence homology with human matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), anti-product antibodies could theoretically interfere with human MMPs. In vitro studies showed no evidence of cross-reactivity between anti-drug-antibody positive patient sera and a series of relevant MMPs. In addition, no clinical safety concerns related to the inhibition of endogenous MMPs have been observed.
Immunogenicity assay results are highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay used in detection and may be influenced by several factors, including sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease. For these reasons, comparison of incidence of antibodies to collagenase clostridium histolyticum with the incidence of antibodies to other products may be misleading.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of XIAFLEX. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Acute Lower Back Pain Reactions Reports of acute lower back pain reactions, sometimes accompanied by radiation of pain to the lower extremities, chest and arms, muscle spasms, chest pain, paresthesias and dyspnea, have been received involving patients treated with XIAFLEX for Peyronie’s disease. Some patients have also experienced temporary gait instability and an inability to ambulate for brief periods of time post injection.
These events have occurred in close temporal proximity to XIAFLEX treatments. During retreatment injections with XIAFLEX, cases of recurrent acute lower back pain reactions have been reported. These events can be mild to severe in intensity.
The events typically resolved within 15 minutes, but some lasted up to 30 minutes, and one event lasted 1.5 hours. The events typically did not require intervention, but some required observation and treatment with analgesics. The events typically resolved without sequelae, but in one event, pain improved but did not resolve at the time of final report.
Skin and Soft Tissue Necrosis Events Reports of localized skin and soft tissue necrosis, occurring as sequelae of penile hematoma, have been received in patients treated with XIAFLEX for Peyronie’s disease. Some of the cases required surgical intervention. Syncope and Presyncope Cases of syncope and presyncope have been reported in the postmarketing period in patients treated with XIAFLEX. Potential triggers for the syncopal events, including post-procedure pain, suggest a vasovagal mechanism.
Most, but not all the cases, occurred in the immediate treatment period or within 1 to 2 days following injection. Bodily injuries, including concussion, head abrasion, and other accidental injuries, have been reported in association with the syncopal events.
Warnings & Cautions for Xiaflex
Tendon Rupture or Other Serious Injury to the Injected Finger/Hand in the
Treatment of Dupuytren’s Contracture In the controlled and uncontrolled portions of clinical trials in Dupuytren’s contracture, flexor tendon ruptures occurred after XIAFLEX injection . Injection of XIAFLEX into collagen-containing structures such as tendons or ligaments of the hand may result in damage to those structures and possible permanent injury such as tendon rupture or ligament damage. Therefore, XIAFLEX should be injected only into the collagen cord with a MP or PIP joint contracture, and care should be taken to avoid injecting into tendons, nerves, blood vessels, or other collagen-containing structures of the hand. When injecting a cord affecting a PIP joint of the fifth finger, the needle insertion should not be more than 2 to 3 mm in depth and avoid injecting more than 4 mm distal to the palmar digital crease . Other XIAFLEX-associated serious local adverse reactions included pulley rupture, ligament injury, complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), sensory abnormality of the hand, and skin laceration (tear). In a historically controlled post-marketing trial, the incidence of skin laceration (22%) was higher for subjects treated with two concurrent injections of XIAFLEX compared with subjects treated with up to three single injections in the placebo-controlled premarketing trials (9%). Postmarketing cases of skin laceration requiring skin graft after finger extension procedures and local skin and soft-tissue necrosis, some requiring skin grafting or, other surgical interventions including finger amputation have been reported.
Signs or symptoms that may reflect serious injury to the injected finger/hand should be promptly evaluated because surgical intervention may be required.
Corporal Rupture (Penile Fracture) or Other Serious Injury to the Penis in
the Treatment of Peyronie’s Disease Corporal rupture was reported as an adverse reaction after XIAFLEX injections in 5 of 1044 (0.5%) XIAFLEX-treated patients in the controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials in Peyronie’s disease. In other XIAFLEX-treated patients (9 of 1044; 0.9%), a combination of penile ecchymoses or hematoma, sudden penile detumescence, and/or a penile “popping” sound or sensation was reported, and in these cases, a diagnosis of corporal rupture cannot be excluded. These patients were managed without surgical intervention, but the long-term consequences are unknown.
Severe penile hematoma was also reported as an adverse reaction in 39 of 1044 patients (3.7%) in the controlled and uncontrolled clinical trials in Peyronie’s disease . In the postmarketing setting, cases of localized skin and soft tissue necrosis occurring as sequelae of penile hematoma have been reported. Some of the cases required surgical intervention. Injection of XIAFLEX into collagen-containing structures such as the corpora cavernosa of the penis may result in damage to those structures and possible injury such as corporal rupture (penile fracture). Therefore, XIAFLEX should be injected only into the Peyronie’s plaque and care should be taken to avoid injecting into the urethra, nerves, blood vessels, corpora cavernosa or other collagen-containing structures of the penis.
Signs or symptoms that may reflect serious injury to the penis should be promptly evaluated in order to assess for corporal rupture or severe penile hematoma, which may require surgical intervention.
XIAFLEX
REMS Program Because of the risks of corporal rupture (penile fracture) or other serious penile injury in the treatment of Peyronie’s disease, XIAFLEX is available only through the XIAFLEX REMS Program . Required components of the XIAFLEX REMS Program include the following: Prescribers must be certified with the program by enrolling and completing training in the administration of XIAFLEX treatment for Peyronie’s disease. Healthcare sites must be certified with the program and ensure that XIAFLEX is only dispensed for use by certified prescribers. Further information is available at www.XIAFLEXREMS.com or 1-877-313-1235.
Hypersensitivity Reactions, Including Anaphylaxis
In the controlled portions of the clinical trials in Dupuytren’s contracture (Studies 1 and 2), a greater proportion of XIAFLEX-treated patients (15%) compared to placebo-treated patients (1%) had mild allergic reactions (pruritus) after up to 3 injections. The incidence of XIAFLEX-associated pruritus increased after more XIAFLEX injections in patients with Dupuytren’s contracture. In the double-blind, placebo-controlled portions of the clinical trials in Peyronie’s disease (Studies 1 and 2), a greater proportion of XIAFLEX-treated patients (4%) compared to placebo-treated patients (1%) had localized pruritus after up to 4 treatment cycles (involving up to 8 XIAFLEX injection procedures). The incidence of XIAFLEX-associated pruritus was similar after each injection regardless of the number of injections administered.
Because XIAFLEX contains foreign proteins, severe allergic reactions to XIAFLEX can occur. Anaphylaxis was reported in a post-marketing clinical trial (Study 3) in one patient who had previous exposure to XIAFLEX for the treatment of Dupuytren’s contracture. Some patients with Dupuytren’s contracture developed IgE-anti-drug antibodies in greater proportions and higher titers with successive XIAFLEX injections.
Healthcare providers should be prepared to address severe allergic reactions following XIAFLEX injections.
Risk of Bleeding in Patients with Abnormal Coagulation
In the XIAFLEX trials in Dupuytren’s contracture (Studies 1 and 2), 70% and 38% of XIAFLEX-treated patients developed an ecchymosis/contusion or an injection site hemorrhage, respectively (see Table 3). In the XIAFLEX controlled trials in Peyronie’s disease (Studies 1 and 2), 65.5% of XIAFLEX-treated patients developed penile hematoma, and 14.5% developed penile ecchymosis (see Table 5). Patients with abnormal coagulation (except for patients taking low-dose aspirin, e.g., up to 150 mg per day) were excluded from participating in these studies. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of XIAFLEX in patients receiving anticoagulant medications (other than low-dose aspirin, e.g., up to 150 mg per day) within 7 days prior to XIAFLEX administration is not known. In addition, it is recommended to avoid use of XIAFLEX in patients with coagulation disorders, including patients receiving concomitant anticoagulants (except for low-dose aspirin).
Acute Post-Injection Back Pain Reactions Acute post-injection back pain reactions have been
reported in the postmarketing period in patients treated with XIAFLEX for Peyronie’s disease . These events typically have an onset immediately or within minutes of injection. The acute lower back pain can be mild to severe in intensity and can radiate to the legs, arms and chest. Other systemic symptoms, such as chest pain, headache, and dyspnea, have been reported along with back pain episodes.
None of the events were reported to occur after the patient’s first XIAFLEX injection and a few were reported to occur during a second treatment course . Reported events typically resolved within 15 minutes, but some lasted up to 30 minutes, and one event lasted 1.5 hours. Reported events typically did not require intervention, but some required observation and treatment with analgesics.
Syncope and Presyncope Cases of syncope and presyncope have been reported in
the postmarketing period in patients treated with XIAFLEX. Most, but not all, cases in patients with Peyronie's disease, occurred in association with post-injection penile pain and hematoma, penile pain with spontaneous erections, and pain during micturition. These potential triggers for the syncopal events suggest a vasovagal mechanism. Make Peyronie's disease patients aware of the potential for penile pain and painful penile hematoma that could trigger syncope and presyncope after treatment with XIAFLEX. In most cases in patients with Dupuytren's Contracture, the injection procedure, finger extension procedure, or pain following the procedures were reported as potential triggers for the events, suggesting a vasovagal mechanism.
Most, but not all cases in patients with Dupuytren's contracture, occurred in the immediate treatment period (injection or finger extension procedure) or within 1 to 2 days following the injection or finger extension procedure. If presyncopal symptoms occur, patients should remain recumbent until symptoms resolve. Syncope may be associated with bodily injuries, including concussion, head abrasion, and other accidental injuries.
Drug Interactions with Xiaflex
Anticoagulant drugs: XIAFLEX should be used with caution in patients receiving concomitant anticoagulants (except for low-dose aspirin) .
Pregnancy Safety for Xiaflex
Pregnancy Pregnancy Category B There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of XIAFLEX in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, XIAFLEX should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed. Risk Summary Based on animal data, XIAFLEX is not predicted to increase the risk for major developmental abnormalities in humans.
Human Data Human pharmacokinetic studies showed that XIAFLEX levels were not quantifiable in the systemic circulation following injection into a Dupuytren’s cord. Low levels of XIAFLEX were quantifiable in the plasma of evaluable male subjects for up to 30 minutes following administration of XIAFLEX into the penile plaque of subjects with Peyronie’s disease. Almost all patients develop anti-product antibodies (anti-AUX-I and anti-AUX-II) after treatment with XIAFLEX, and the clinical significance of anti-product antibody formation on a developing fetus is not known.
Animal Data Reproduction studies have been performed in rats with intravenous exposures up to approximately 11 times the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of XIAFLEX on a mg/m 2 basis, and have revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to collagenase clostridium histolyticum.
Pediatric Use of Xiaflex
Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of XIAFLEX in pediatric patients less than 18 years old have not been established.
Contraindications for Xiaflex
is contraindicated in: the treatment of Peyronie’s plaques that involve the penile urethra due to potential risk to this structure. patients with a history of hypersensitivity to XIAFLEX or to collagenase used in any other therapeutic application or application method . Peyronie’s plaques that involve the penile urethra History of hypersensitivity to XIAFLEX or to collagenase used in other therapeutic applications
Overdosage Information for Xiaflex
The effects of overdose of XIAFLEX are unknown. It is possible that multiple simultaneous or excessive doses of XIAFLEX may cause more severe local effects than the recommended doses including serious adverse reactions in the injected area (e.g., tendon ruptures or corporal ruptures dependent on the injection site). Supportive care and symptomatic treatment are recommended in these circumstances.
Clinical Studies of Xiaflex
Dupuytren’s Contracture
The efficacy of 0.58 mg of XIAFLEX was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials in 374 adult patients with Dupuytren’s contracture (Studies 1 and 2). At study entry, patients must have had: a finger flexion contracture with a palpable cord of at least one finger (other than the thumb) of 20 to 100 degrees in a metacarpophalangeal (MP) joint or 20 to 80 degrees in a proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint and a positive “table top test” defined as the inability to simultaneously place the affected finger(s) and palm flat against a table top. Patients could not have received a surgical treatment (e.g., fasciectomy, fasciotomy) on the selected primary joint within 90 days before the first injection of study medication and patients could not have received anticoagulation medication (except for up to 150 mg of aspirin per day) within 7 days before the first injection of study medication. The cord affecting the selected primary joint received up to 3 injections of 0.58 mg of XIAFLEX or placebo on Days 0, 30, and 60. About 24 hours after each injection of study medication, if needed, the investigator manipulated (extended) the treated finger in an attempt to facilitate rupture of the cord (finger extension procedure). Following manipulation, patients were fitted with a splint, instructed to wear the splint at bedtime for up to 4 months, and instructed to perform a series of finger flexion and extension exercises each day.
Table 6 shows the baseline disease characteristics of patients with Dupuytren’s contracture in Studies 1 and 2. Table 6. Baseline Disease Characteristics of Patients with Dupuytren’s Contracture 1 Prior surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture included fasciotomy and fasciectomy. Study 1 Study 2 Proportion of patients with prior surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture 1 38% 53% Proportion of patients with prior surgery for Dupuytren’s contracture on the same finger as the primary joint 1 8% 18% Mean number of affected joints 3.0
In Studies 1 and 2, the primary endpoint was to evaluate the
proportion of patients who achieved a reduction in contracture of the selected primary joint (MP or PIP) to within 0 to 5 degrees of normal, 30 days after the last injection of that joint on Days 30, 60, or 90 (after up to 3 injections). As shown in Table 7, a greater proportion of XIAFLEX-treated patients compared to placebo-treated patients achieved the primary endpoint. Table 7. Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Reduction in Contracture of the Primary Joint to 0° to 5° After Up to 3 Injections in Studies 1 and 2 a a Patients may have received up to 3 injections of study medication into the cords associated with contracture of the primary joints on Days 0, 30, and 60. Assessments were made 30 days after the last injection (on Days 30, 60, or 90). b For XIAFLEX-treated patients, the mean (±SD) number of injections given to the cord associated with the contracture was 1.7 (±0.8) in the 90-day controlled period in each trial. c MP joints are metacarpophalangeal joints. d PIP joints are proximal interphalangeal joints. e 95% confidence interval. Treated Joint Study 1 Study 2 XIAFLEX b Placebo XIAFLEX b Placebo All Joints (MP and PIP) c,d Difference (CI e ) N=203 N=103 N=45 N=21 64% 57% (47%, 67%) 7% - 44% 40% (14%, 62%) 5% - MP Joints c Difference (CI e ) N=133 N=69 N=20 N=11 77% 69% (57%, 79%) 7% - 65% 56% (19%, 83%) 9% - PIP Joints d Difference (CI e ) N=70 N=34 N=25 N=10 40% 34% (14%, 52%) 6% - 28% 28% (-10%, 61%) 0% - The proportion of patients who achieved a contracture reduction of the primary joint to 0 to 5 degrees after the first injection was 39% and 1% in Study 1 and 27% and 5% in Study 2 in the XIAFLEX and placebo groups respectively.
XIAFLEX-treated patients, compared to placebo-treated patients, showed a greater increase from baseline in the range of motion of MP and PIP joints (see Table 8). Table 8. Mean Increase in Range of Motion from Baseline in Degrees After Up to 3 Injections in Studies 1 and 2 a a Patients may have received up to 3 injections of study medication into the cords associated with contracture of the primary joints on Days 0, 30, and 60. Assessments were made 30 days after the last injection (on Days 30, 60, or 90). Baseline and final range of motion degree values are expressed in mean (SD). b MP = Metacarpophalangeal joint c PIP = Proximal interphalangeal joint Range of Motion = Degrees of Full Flexion minus Degrees of Fixed Extension Not all patients had range of motion values at both time points. Treated Joint Study 1 Study 2 XIAFLEX Placebo XIAFLEX Placebo All Joints b,c N=196 N=102 N=45 N=21 Baseline 44 45 40 44 Final 80 50 76 52 Increase 36 4 35 8 MP Joints b N=129 N=68 N=20 N=11 Baseline 43 46 40 41 Final 83 50 80 50 Increase 41 4 40 9 PIP Joints c N=67 N=34 N=25 N=10 Baseline 46 44 41 47 Final 75 49 73 54 Increase 28 5 32 7 Recurrence A long-term, observational, Year 2 to Year 5, follow-up study (Study 4) was undertaken to evaluate recurrence of contracture and long-term safety in subjects who received up to 8 single injections of XIAFLEX 0.58 mg in a previous Phase 3 open-label or double-blind with open-label extension study. Of the 950 patients eligible for Study 4, only 645 patients enrolled.
Of the 645 patients enrolled, 30% discontinued the study. Recurrence was assessed in successfully treated joints (i.e., subjects had a reduction in contracture to 5 degrees or less at the Day 30 evaluation after the last injection of XIAFLEX in a previous study) and was defined as an increase in joint contracture by at least 20 degrees in the presence of a palpable cord, or the joint underwent medical or surgical intervention primarily to correct a new or worsening Dupuytren’s contracture in that joint. Data on remaining recurrence free following successful treatment with XIAFLEX are provided in Figure 1. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Plot Displaying Estimated Probability of Remaining Recurrence-Free over Time in the Observational Study 4 Among Joints That Were Successfully Treated in a Previous Study Retreatment of Recurrent Contractures Study 5 retreated a subset of patients from Study 4 for a joint that was previously successfully treated but had recurrence.
Patients in Study 5 received up to 3 injections of XIAFLEX (0.58 mg). Of the 91patients eligible for Study 5, 52 patients enrolled. In Study 5, 65% of recurrent MP joints and 45% of recurrent PIP joints achieved clinical success after retreatment with up to three injections of XIAFLEX. There was no control group for comparison in Study 5. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Plot Displaying Estimated Probability of Remaining Recurrence-Free over Time in the Observational Study 4 among Joints that were Successfully Treated in a Previous Study
Peyronie’s Disease
The efficacy of XIAFLEX was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centered trials in 832 adult males with Peyronie’s disease (Studies 1 and 2). At study entry, patients must have had penile curvature deformity of at least 30 degrees in the stable phase of Peyronie’s disease. Patients were excluded if they had a ventral curvature deformity, an isolated hourglass deformity or a calcified plaque that could have interfered with the injection technique. At baseline, penile pain was either not present or was mild in most (98%) patients.
In these trials, patients were given up to 4 treatment cycles of XIAFLEX or placebo (weeks 0, 6, 12, 18), and were followed in a non-treatment follow-up period (weeks 24 - 52). In each treatment cycle, two injections of XIAFLEX or two injections of placebo were administered 1 to 3 days apart. A penile modeling procedure was performed on patients at the study site 1 to 3 days after the second injection of the cycle. The treatment cycle was repeated at approximately 6-week intervals for up to 3 additional times, for a maximum of 8 total injection procedures and 4 total modeling procedures.
In addition, patients were instructed to perform penile modeling at home for 6 weeks after each treatment cycle . Table 9 shows the baseline disease characteristics of patients with Peyronie’s disease in Studies 1 and 2. Table 9. Baseline Disease Characteristics of Patients a with Peyronie’s Disease (PD) a Subjects were from intent-to-treat (ITT) population and received at least one dose of study drug in Study 1 or 2. b Each PDQ assessment required subjects to have had vaginal intercourse in the 3 months prior to completion. c Higher scores represent worse symptoms. Study 1 Study 2 XIAFLEX N=277 Placebo N=140 XIAFLEX N=274 Placebo N=141 Mean age (years) (Min-Max) 57.9 (28 - 79) 58.2 (30 - 81) 57.3 (23 - 84) 57.6 (33 - 78) Mean duration of PD (years) (Min-Max) 3.9 (1.0 - 35.9) 4.8 (1.0 - 50.8) 4.2 (1.1 - 30.9) 3.4 (1.1 - 47.1) Mean Penile Curvature Deformity (degrees) (Min-Max) 48.8 (30-90) 49.0 (30-89) 51.3 (30-90) 49.6 (30-85) Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ) b, – Mean Patient-Reported PD Bother Domain Score (range: 0-16) c 7.5 7.4 7.4
History of Erectile Dysfunction N (%) 128 75 134 76
Before the first dose of study drug was administered, eligible subjects were stratified by the degree of curvature deformity (30 to 60 degrees, and 61 to 90 degrees) and then randomized into two treatment groups to receive either XIAFLEX or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. The efficacy population (modified intent-to-treat population) comprised a total of 612 intent-to-treat subjects (ITT) who had both a curvature deformity measurement and a Peyronie's disease questionnaire (PDQ) assessment at baseline, and at one or more subsequent time points in Studies 1 and 2, and had engaged in vaginal intercourse within 3 months prior to each PDQ assessment. In Studies 1 and 2, the co-primary endpoints were: the percent change from baseline to Week 52 in penile curvature deformity and; the change from baseline to Week 52 in the Bother domain score of the PDQ The Bother domain score is a composite of the following patient-reported items: concern about erection pain, erection appearance, and the impact of Peyronie’s disease on intercourse and on frequency of intercourse.
Penile Curvature Deformity (Co-primary Endpoint) XIAFLEX treatment significantly improved penile curvature deformity in patients with Peyronie’s disease compared with placebo (see Table 10). The improvement in curvature deformity was numerically similar among subjects with baseline curvature deformity from 30 to 60 degrees and those with curvature deformity from 61 to 90 degrees. Table 10. Mean Percent Change in Penile Curvature Deformity from Baseline to Week 52 - Studies 1 and 2 a Mean percent change, treatment difference, 95% CI, and p value were based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline penile curvature, and their interaction and using last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. The mITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had both a penile curvature deformity measurement and a Peyronie's disease questionnaire (PDQ) assessment at baseline and at one or more subsequent time points. b p value < 0.01 Study 1 Study 2 XIAFLEX N=199 Placebo N=104 XIAFLEX N=202 Placebo N=107 Baseline Mean (degrees) 48.8° 49.0° 51.3° 49.6° Mean Percent Change a -35.0% -17.8% -33.2% -21.8% Treatment Difference (95% CI) -17.2% b (-26.7%, -7.6%) -11.4% b (-19.5%, -3.3%) Figure 2. Mean Percent Change in Penile Curvature Deformity –Study 1 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model - adjusted values with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline penile curvature, and their interaction and using last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population.
Figure 3. Mean Percent Change in Penile Curvature Deformity – Study 2 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model - adjusted values with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline penile curvature, and their interaction and using last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Peyronie’s Disease Questionnaire Bother Domain Score (Co-primary Endpoint) XIAFLEX significantly reduced patient-reported bother associated with Peyronie’s disease compared with placebo (see Table 11). The reduction in the bother domain score was numerically similar between patient groups stratified by degree of baseline curvature deformity (30 to 60 degrees, and 61 to 90 degrees). Table 11. Mean Change in Peyronie’s Disease Bother Domain Score from Baseline to Week 52 – Studies 1 and 2 a Mean change, treatment difference, 95% CI, and p value all based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline penile curvature, and their interaction and using last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. The mITT population was defined as all randomized subjects who had both a penile curvature deformity measurement and a Peyronie's disease questionnaire (PDQ) assessment at baseline and at one or more subsequent time points. b p value < 0.05. Study 1 Study 2 XIAFLEX N=199 Placebo N=104 XIAFLEX N=202 Placebo N=107 Baseline Mean 7.5 7.4 7.4
Mean Change a -2.8 -1.6 -2.6 -1.5 Treatment Difference (95% CI) -1.2
b (-2.4, -0.03) -1.1 b (-2.1, -0.002) Figure 4. Mean Change in Patient-Reported Peyronie’s Disease Bother Domain Score – Study 1 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model - adjusted values with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline penile curvature, and their interaction and using last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Figure 5. Mean Change in Patient-Reported Peyronie’s Disease Bother Domain Score – Study 2 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) model - adjusted values with factors for treatment, stratum of baseline penile curvature, and their interaction and using last observation carried forward (LOCF) in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the mean percent improvement in curvature deformity or mean reduction in the bother domain score following treatment with XIAFLEX based on the severity of baseline erectile dysfunction or concomitant phosphodiesterase type 5 (PDE5) inhibitor use.
Figure 2. Mean Percent Change in Penile Curvature Deformity – Study 1 Figure 3. Mean Percent Change in Penile Curvature Deformity – Study 2 Figure 4. Mean Change in Patient-Reported Peyronie’s Disease Bother Domain Score – Study 1 Figure 5. Mean Change in Patient-Reported Peyronie’s Disease Bother Domain Score – Study 2
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Xiaflex?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Xiaflex Prices