Xeomin Drug Information
Generic name: INCOBOTULINUMTOXINA
Acetylcholine Release Inhibitor [EPC] Neuromuscular Blocker [EPC]
Uses of Xeomin
Chronic Sialorrhea XEOMIN is indicated for the treatment of chronic sialorrhea in patients 2 years of age and older.
Upper Limb Spasticity XEOMIN is indicated for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in patients 2 years of age and older.
Cervical Dystonia XEOMIN is indicated for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adult patients.
Upper Facial Lines (Glabellar Lines, Horizontal Forehead Lines, and Lateral Canthal Lines) XEOMIN is indicated in adult patients for the temporary improvement in the appearance of upper facial lines: moderate to severe glabellar lines (GL) associated with corrugator and/or procerus muscle activity moderate to severe horizontal forehead lines (HFL) associated with frontalis muscle activity moderate to severe lateral canthal lines (LCL) associated with orbicularis oculi muscle activity.
Dosage & Administration of Xeomin
Instructions for Safe Use
The potency Units of XEOMIN for injection are specific to the preparation and assay method utilized. Units of biological activity of XEOMIN cannot be compared to or converted into Units of any other botulinum toxin products assessed with any other specific assay method. Reconstituted XEOMIN is intended for intramuscular or intra-salivary gland injection only.
Do not exceed the recommended maximum cumulative dose in a treatment session for any indication.
Recommended Dose for Chronic Sialorrhea Chronic Sialorrhea in Adult Patients The recommended total dose per treatment session is 100 Units. XEOMIN is injected into the parotid and submandibular glands on both sides (i.e., 4 injection sites per treatment session). The dose is divided with a ratio of 3:2 between the parotid and submandibular glands (Table 1).
Figure 1: Glands for Injection in Chronic Sialorrhea in Adult Patients Use the following guidelines if locating salivary glands using anatomic landmarks: 1 To inject the parotid gland, find the midpoint on the line connecting the tragus and mandible angle (Site A and B, respectively, Figure 1), approximately at the height of the ear lobe. Deliver the injection one finger breadth anterior to this site (Star 1, Figure 1). 2 To inject the submandibular gland, find the midpoint between the angle of the mandible and the tip of the chin (Site B and C, respectively, Figure 1). Deliver the injection one finger breadth medial to the inferior surface of the mandible at this site (Star 2, Figure 1).
Table 1: Dosing by Gland for Treatment of Chronic Sialorrhea in Adult Patients The concentration used in the clinical study after reconstitution was 5 Units/0.1mL. Determine the timing for repeat treatment based on the actual clinical need of the individual patient, and no sooner than every 16 weeks. Ultrasound imaging is recommended to guide needle placement into the salivary glands.
XEOMIN has not been studied in children weighing less than 12 kg. Figure 2: Glands for Injection in Chronic Sialorrhea in Pediatric Patients Table 2: Dosing by Body Weight Class for Treatment of Chronic Sialorrhea in Pediatric Patients The concentration used in the clinical study after reconstitution was
Units/0.1 mL. Figure 2 2.3 Recommended Dose for Upper Limb Spasticity Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Patients Tailor the dosage, frequency, and number of injection sites to the individual patient based on the size, number, and location of muscles to be treated, severity of spasticity, presence of local muscle weakness, patient's response to previous treatment, and adverse event history with XEOMIN. Administer repeat XEOMIN treatments no sooner than every 12 weeks.
In patients not previously treated with a botulinum toxin, begin initial dosing at the low end of the recommended dosing range and titrate as clinically necessary. Most patients in clinical studies were retreated between 12 and 14 weeks. Table 3: XEOMIN Dosing by Muscle for Treatment of Adult Upper Limb Spasticity 1 Figure 3: Muscles Involved In Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Figure 3 Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Tailor the exact dosage, frequency, and number of injection sites to the individual patient based on size, number and localization of involved muscles; the severity of spasticity; and the presence of local muscle weakness.
The maximum recommended dose is 8 Units/kg, divided among affected muscles, up to a maximum dose of 200 Units per single upper limb. If both upper limbs are treated, do not exceed a total XEOMIN dosage of 16 Units/kg, up to a maximum of 400 Units. Based on the selected dose, a reconstituted solution at a concentration between 1.25 Units/0.1 mL and 5 Units/0.1 mL is recommended.
Table 4 includes the recommended dose ranges for the treatment of the clinical patterns of flexed elbow, flexed wrist, pronated forearm, clenched fist, and thumb-in-palm. In previously treated patients, their past dose, response to treatment, duration of effect, and adverse event history should be taken into consideration when determining the XEOMIN dose. In the treatment of cervical dystonia, XEOMIN is usually injected into the sternocleidomastoid, levator scapulae, splenius capitis, scalenus, and/or the trapezius muscle(s) (see Figure 5 ).
This list is not exhaustive, as any of the muscles responsible for controlling head position may require treatment. The dose and number of injection sites in each treated muscle should be individualized based on the number and location of the muscle(s) to be treated, the degree of spasticity/dystonia, muscle mass, body weight, and response to any previous botulinum toxin injections. The frequency of XEOMIN repeat treatments should be determined by clinical response, but should generally be no more frequent than every 12 weeks.
In patients previously treated with a botulinum toxin A, consider their past dose, response to treatment, duration of effect, and adverse event history when determining the XEOMIN dose. Do not exceed a total XEOMIN dose of 100 Units per treatment session (50 Units per eye). Inject XEOMIN into the lateral and medial orbicularis oculi muscle of the upper lid; lateral canthus and the lateral orbicularis oculi muscle of the lower lid; and the corrugator muscle, if necessary (see Figure 6 ).
The number and location of injections may be changed in response to adverse reactions or based on the patient's response to treatment, but do not exceed a total dose of 50 Units per eye. Figure 6
Recommended Dose for Upper Facial Lines (Glabellar Lines, Horizontal Forehead Lines, and Lateral Canthal Lines) The maximum recommended dose of XEOMIN for simultaneous treatment of upper facial lines in adult patients is 64 Units, comprised of 20 Units for GL, 20 Units for HFL, and 24 Units for LCL. Administer retreatment with XEOMIN no more frequently than every three months. When not treating upper facial lines (GL, HFL, and LCL) simultaneously in adult patients, refer to the following instructions: Glabellar Lines Equally distribute GL treatment to five equal intramuscular injections of 4 Units each.
To reduce the complication of ptosis take the following steps: Avoid injection near the levator palpebrae superioris, particularly in patients with larger brow depressor complexes. Place corrugator injections at least 1 cm above the bony supraorbital ridge. Horizontal Forehead Lines in Conjunction with Glabellar Lines Treat HFL in conjunction with GL to minimize the potential for brow ptosis.
The maximum recommended dose for treatment of HFL (20 Units) in conjunction with GL (20 Units) is 40 Units. Place one injection in the horizontal extension of the lateral canthus approximately 1 cm lateral from the bony orbital rim. Place the other two injections approximately 1 cm above and below the area of the first injection (see Figure 7 ).
Give injections with the needle bevel tip up and oriented away from the eye. Avoid injections too close to the zygomaticus major muscle to prevent lip ptosis. Figure 7: Injection Sites for Upper Facial Lines (Glabellar Lines, Horizontal Forehead Lines, and Lateral Canthal Lines) Figure 7
Preparation and Reconstitution Technique Prior to injection, reconstitute each vial of XEOMIN with sterile, preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP. A 20-27 gauge short bevel needle is recommended for reconstitution. Draw up an appropriate amount of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP into a syringe (see Table 5 ).
Clean the exposed portion of the rubber stopper of the vial with alcohol (70%) prior to insertion of the needle. After vertical insertion of the needle through the rubber stopper, the vacuum will draw the saline into the vial. Gently inject any remaining saline into the vial to avoid foam formation.
If the vacuum does not pull the saline into the vial, then XEOMIN must be discarded. Remove the syringe from the vial and mix XEOMIN with the saline by carefully swirling and inverting/flipping the vial – do not shake vigorously. Reconstituted XEOMIN is a clear, colorless solution free of particulate matter.
Do not use XEOMIN if the reconstituted solution has a cloudy appearance or contains floccular or particulate matter. After reconstitution, use XEOMIN for only one injection session and for only one patient. Administer reconstituted XEOMIN within 24 hours after dilution.
During this time period, store unused reconstituted XEOMIN in the original container in a refrigerator 2°C -8°C (36°F -46°F) for up to 24 hours until time of use. XEOMIN vials are for single-dose only. Discard any unused portion.
Diluent volumes for reconstitution of XEOMIN are indicated in Table 5.
If proposed injection sites are marked with a pen, DO NOT inject XEOMIN through the pen marks; otherwise a permanent tattooing effect may occur. For intramuscular injections, the number of injection sites is dependent upon the size of the muscle to be treated and the volume of reconstituted XEOMIN injected. Inject XEOMIN carefully when injected at sites close to sensitive structures, such as the carotid artery, lung apices, and esophagus.
Before administering XEOMIN, the healthcare provider should be familiar with the patient's anatomy and any anatomic alterations, e.g., due to prior surgical procedures. Chronic Sialorrhea Chronic Sialorrhea in Adult Patients Use a sterile needle (e.g., 27-30 gauge (0.30-0.40 mm diameter), 12.5 mm length) for intra-salivary gland administration for the treatment of chronic sialorrhea. Inject XEOMIN close to the center of the gland.
The salivary glands can be located using ultrasound imaging or surface anatomical landmarks. Ultrasound guidance is recommended for the localization of the involved salivary glands. Upper Limb Spasticity Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Patients Use a sterile needle (e.g., 26-gauge (0.45 mm diameter), 37 mm length for superficial muscles; or 22-gauge (0.70 mm diameter), 75 mm length for deeper musculature) in the intramuscular administration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity in adults.
Localization of the involved muscles with electromyographic guidance, nerve stimulation, or ultrasound techniques is recommended. Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Use a sterile needle (e.g., 30-gauge (0.30 mm diameter), 25 mm length for superficial muscles; or 27-gauge (0.40 mm diameter), 37 mm length for deeper musculature) in the intramuscular administration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity in pediatric patients. Localization of the involved muscles with electromyographic guidance, ultrasound, or nerve stimulation techniques may be useful.
Upper Facial Lines (Glabellar Lines, Horizontal Forehead Lines, and Lateral Canthal Lines) Use a sterile needle, 13 mm length for the intramuscular administration in the treatment of upper facial lines.
Monitoring to Assess Effectiveness
The median onset of XEOMIN treatment effect occurs within two to seven days after injection. The typical duration of effect of each treatment is up to 12-16 weeks; however, the duration of effect may vary in individual patients.
| Gland(s) | Units Per Side | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Parotid gland(s) | 30 Units | 60 Units |
| Submandibular gland(s) | 20 Units | 40 Units |
| Both Glands | 50 Units | 100 Units |
| Body weight | Parotid gland, each side | Submandibular gland, each side | Total dose, both glands, both sides | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose per gland | Volume per injection | Dose per gland | Volume per injection | ||
| 12 kg or more to less than 15 kg | 6 Units | 0.24 mL | 4 Units | 0.16 mL | 20 Units |
| 15 kg or more to less than 19 kg | 9 Units | 0.36 mL | 6 Units | 0.24 mL | 30 Units |
| 19 kg or more to less than 23 kg | 12 Units | 0.48 mL | 8 Units | 0.32 mL | 40 Units |
| 23 kg or more to less than 27 kg | 15 Units | 0.6 mL | 10 Units | 0.4 mL | 50 Units |
| 27 kg or more to less than 30 kg | 18 Units | 0.72 mL | 12 Units | 0.48 mL | 60 Units |
| 30 kg or more | 22.5 Units | 0.9 mL | 15 Units | 0.6 mL | 75 Units |
| Clinical Pattern Muscle | Units (Range) | Number of injection sites per muscle |
|---|---|---|
| Clenched Fist | ||
| Flexor digitorum superficialis | 25 Units-100 Units | 2 |
| Flexor digitorum profundus | 25 Units-100 Units | 2 |
| Flexed Wrist | ||
| Flexor carpi radialis | 25 Units-100 Units | 1-2 |
| Flexor carpi ulnaris | 20 Units-100 Units | 1-2 |
| Flexed Elbow | ||
| Brachioradialis | 25 Units-100 Units | 1-3 |
| Biceps | 50 Units-200 Units | 1-4 |
| Brachialis | 25 Units-100 Units | 1-2 |
| Pronated Forearm | ||
| Pronator quadratus | 10 Units-50 Units | 1 |
| Pronator teres | 25 Units-75 Units | 1-2 |
| Thumb-in-Palm | ||
| Flexor pollicis longus | 10 Units-50 Units | 1 |
| Adductor pollicis | 5 Units-30 Units | 1 |
| Flexor pollicis brevis/Opponens pollicis | 5 Units-30 Units | 1 |
| Clinical Pattern Muscle | Dosage | Number of Injection Sites per Muscle | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Range (Units/kg) | Maximum (Units) | ||
| Flexed Elbow | |||
| Brachioradialis | 1-2 | 50 | 1-2 |
| Biceps | 2-3 | 75 | 1-3 |
| Brachialis | 1-2 | 50 | 1-2 |
| Flexed Wrist | |||
| Flexor carpi radialis | 1 | 25 | 1 |
| Flexor carpi ulnaris | 1 | 25 | 1 |
| Pronated Forearm | |||
| Pronator quadratus | 0.5 | 12.5 | 1 |
| Pronator teres | 1-2 | 50 | 1-2 |
| Clenched Fist | |||
| Flexor digitorum superficialis | 1 | 25 | 1 |
| Flexor digitorum profundus | 1 | 25 | 1 |
| Thumb-in-Palm | |||
| Flexor pollicis longus | 1 | 25 | 1 |
| Adductor pollicis | 0.5 | 12.5 | 1 |
| Flexor pollicis brevis/ opponens pollicis | 0.5 | 12.5 | 1 |
| Volume of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP | 50 Unit Vial: Resulting dose in Units per 0.1 mL | 100 Unit Vial: Resulting dose in Units per 0.1 mL | 200 Unit Vial: Resulting dose in Units per 0.1 mL |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.25 mL | 20 Units | - | - |
| 0.5 mL | 10 Units | 20 Units | 40 Units |
| 1 mL | 5 Units | 10 Units | 20 Units |
| 1.25 mL | 4 Units | 8 Units | 16 Units |
| 2 mL | 2.5 Units | 5 Units | 10 Units |
| 2.5 mL | 2 Units | 4 Units | 8 Units |
| 4 mL | 1.25 Units | 2.5 Units | 5 Units |
| 5 mL | 1 Unit | 2 Units | 4 Units |
| 8 mL When using 8 mL of diluent for a 100 Unit or 200 Unit vial of XEOMIN, complete the following steps: Reconstitute a 100 Unit or 200 Unit vial of XEOMIN with 4 mL of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, following instructions above. Withdraw 4 mL of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, into an appropriately sized syringe for 8 mL in total. Using the same syringe, draw up the 4 mL of XEOMIN solution from the reconstituted vial and mix gently. | - | 1.25 Units | 2.5 Units |
| 16 mL When using 16 mL of diluent for a 200 Unit vial of XEOMIN, complete the following steps: Reconstitute a 200 Unit vial of XEOMIN with 4 mL of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, following instructions above. Withdraw 12 mL of preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, into an appropriately sized syringe for 16 mL in total. Using the same syringe, draw up the 4 mL of XEOMIN solution from the reconstituted vial and mix gently. | - | - | 1.25 Units |
Side Effects of Xeomin
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Chronic Sialorrhea Chronic Sialorrhea in Adult Patients Table 6 lists the adverse reactions that occurred in ≥3% of XEOMIN-treated patients in the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of the study in adult patients with chronic sialorrhea. The most common adverse reactions (≥4%) were tooth extraction, dry mouth, diarrhea, and hypertension.
In the controlled portion of this study, 74 patients received 100 Units of XEOMIN, and 36 patients received placebo. Of the patients 6-17 years of age, 148 patients received a dose of XEOMIN according to body weight, and 72 patients received placebo. Thirty-five patients 2-5 years of age received an open-label dose of XEOMIN according to body weight.
In the open-label extension period, 222 patients 2-17 years of age received up to three additional treatments with XEOMIN every 16±2 weeks. The safety profile of XEOMIN during the open-label extension period was similar to that observed in the double-blind phase of the placebo-controlled pediatric chronic sialorrhea study. Upper Limb Spasticity Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Patients Table 8 lists the adverse reactions that occurred in ≥2% of XEOMIN-treated patients in two placebo-controlled studies in adult patients with upper limb spasticity.
Study 1 and Study 2 were both double-blind, placebo-controlled studies, with an open-label extension. No relationship between increased dose and increased occurrence of adverse reactions was observed. The most common adverse reactions (≥3% of XEOMIN-treated patients) at the recommended dose of XEOMIN (8 Units/kg) were nasopharyngitis and bronchitis.
At study baseline, approximately 25% had mild, 50% had moderate, and 25% had severe cervical dystonia. Approximately 61% of XEOMIN-treated patients had previously received another botulinum toxin type A product. Table 10 lists adverse reactions that occurred in ≥5% of XEOMIN-treated patients (in any treatment group) and greater than placebo.
Table 10: Adverse Reactions (≥5%) and Greater for XEOMIN than Placebo: Double-Blind Phase of the Placebo-Controlled Cervical Dystonia Study 3 Blepharospasm Study 1 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that only included treatment-naïve patients. XEOMIN-treated patients were 23 to 78 years of age (mean 55 years). Fifty-nine percent of the patients were women, 77% were Asian, and 23% White.
No patients withdrew prematurely because of an adverse event. Table 11 lists the adverse reactions that occurred in ≥6% of XEOMIN-treated patients and greater than placebo. The study only included patients previously treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox).
Table 12 lists the adverse reactions that occurred in ≥5% of XEOMIN-treated patients and greater than placebo. XEOMIN-treated subjects were 19 to 76 years old and were predominantly female (82%). The most frequent adverse reactions ≥1% and greater for XEOMIN than placebo are presented in Table 13.
In the two repeated dose upper facial lines (GL, HFL, and LCL) trials with up to three treatments of XEOMIN, adverse reactions were reported for 123 of the 720 subjects (17%). The incidence of these adverse reactions tended to decrease with subsequent treatments. In both trials, all randomized subjects were followed up for 120 days before they could enter the open-label extension (OLEX) period which comprised two additional treatment cycles, with durations of 120 days each plus up to 30 days for eligibility reassessments per cycle.
During OLEX period, eligible subjects received simultaneous upper facial lines injections of XEOMIN at a total dose of 64 U in all three facial areas (20 U in GL, 20 U in HFL, and 24 U in LCL area). XEOMIN-treated subjects were 24 to 74 years old, and were predominantly female (88%). In open-label, multiple-dose trials, adverse reactions were reported for 105 of the 800 subjects (13%).
Headache was the most common adverse reaction, reported in 7% of subjects, followed by injection site hematoma (1%). Adverse reactions reported in less than 1% of subjects were: facial paresis (brow ptosis), muscle disorder (elevation of eyebrow), injection site pain, and eyelid edema.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been reported during post-approval use of XEOMIN. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure: allergic dermatitis, dysarthria, dysphagia, eye swelling, eyelid edema, flu-like symptoms, herpes zoster, hypersensitivity, injection site pain, injection site reaction, localized allergic reactions (e.g., swelling, edema, erythema, pruritus or rash), muscle spasm, muscular weakness, myalgia, nausea, and persistent dry mouth (> 110 days).
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN 100 Units (N = 74) % | Placebo (N = 36) % |
|---|---|---|
| Tooth extraction | 5 | 0 |
| Dry mouth | 4 | 0 |
| Diarrhea | 4 | 3 |
| Hypertension | 4 | 3 |
| Fall | 3 | 0 |
| Bronchitis | 3 | 0 |
| Dysphonia | 3 | 0 |
| Back pain | 3 | 0 |
| Dry eye | 3 | 0 |
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN (6-17 years) (N = 148) % | Placebo (6-17 years) (N = 72) % |
|---|---|---|
| Bronchitis | 1 | 0 |
| Headache | 1 | 0 |
| Nausea/Vomiting | 1 | 0 |
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN 400 Units (N = 217) % | Placebo (N = 182) % |
|---|---|---|
| Seizure | 3 | 0 |
| Nasopharyngitis | 2 | 0 |
| Dry mouth | 2 | 1 |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 2 | 1 |
| Adverse Reactions | XEOMIN 2 Units/kg N=87 % | XEOMIN 8 Units/kg N=176 % |
|---|---|---|
| Infections and infestations | ||
| Nasopharyngitis | 6 | 3 |
| Bronchitis | 2 | 3 |
| Pharyngotonsillitis Includes pharyngotonsillitis, pharyngitis and tonsillitis | 2 | 2 |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 2 | 2 |
| Respiratory tract infection viral | 1 | 2 |
| Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | ||
| Fall | 0 | 2 |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | ||
| Pain in extremity | 0 | 2 |
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN 120 Units (N=77) % | XEOMIN 240 Units (N=82) % | Placebo (N=74) % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | 23 | 32 | 11 |
| Neck pain | 7 | 15 | 4 |
| Muscular weakness | 7 | 11 | 1 |
| Musculoskeletal pain | 7 | 4 | 1 |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 18 | 24 | 4 |
| Dysphagia | 13 | 18 | 3 |
| Nervous system disorders | 16 | 17 | 7 |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | 16 | 11 | 11 |
| Injection site pain | 9 | 4 | 7 |
| Infections and infestations | 14 | 13 | 11 |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 13 | 10 | 3 |
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN 50 U (N=19) % | Placebo (N=20) % |
|---|---|---|
| Eye disorders | 21 | 10 |
| Eyelid ptosis | 16 | 0 |
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN (N=74) % | Placebo (N=34) % |
|---|---|---|
| Eye disorders | 38 | 21 |
| Eyelid ptosis | 19 | 9 |
| Dry eye | 16 | 12 |
| Visual impairment including vision blurred | 12 | 6 |
| Gastrointestinal disorders | 30 | 15 |
| Dry mouth | 16 | 3 |
| Diarrhea | 8 | 0 |
| Infections and infestations | 20 | 15 |
| Nasopharyngitis | 5 | 3 |
| Respiratory tract infection | 5 | 3 |
| Nervous system disorders | 14 | 9 |
| Headache | 7 | 3 |
| General disorders and administration site conditions | 11 | 9 |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | 11 | 3 |
| Dyspnea | 5 | 3 |
| Upper Facial Lines (GL, HFL, and LCL) | ||
|---|---|---|
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN N=545 % | Placebo N=185 % |
| Injection site bruising | 2 | 1 |
| Adverse Reaction | XEOMIN N=535 % | Placebo N=263 % |
|---|---|---|
| Nervous system disorders | ||
| Headache | 5 | 2 |
Warnings & Cautions for Xeomin
Spread of Toxin Effect
Postmarketing safety data from XEOMIN and other approved botulinum toxins suggest that botulinum toxin effects may, in some cases, be observed beyond the site of local injection. The symptoms are consistent with the mechanism of action of botulinum toxin and may include asthenia, generalized muscle weakness, diplopia, blurred vision, ptosis, dysphagia, dysphonia, dysarthria, urinary incontinence, and breathing difficulties. These symptoms have been reported hours to weeks after injection.
Swallowing and breathing difficulties can be life threatening and there have been reports of death related to the spread of toxin effects. The risk of symptoms is probably greatest in children treated for spasticity but symptoms can occur in adults treated for spasticity and other conditions, and particularly in those patients who have underlying conditions that would predispose them to these symptoms. In unapproved uses, including lower limb spasticity in children, and in approved indications, symptoms consistent with spread of toxin effect have been reported at doses comparable to or lower than doses used to treat cervical dystonia.
Patients or caregivers should be advised to seek immediate medical care if swallowing, speech, or respiratory disorders occur.
Lack of Unit Equivalency Between Botulinum Toxin Products
The potency Units of XEOMIN are specific to the preparation and assay method utilized. Units of biological activity of XEOMIN cannot be compared to or converted into Units of any other botulinum toxin products assessed with any other specific assay method.
Hypersensitivity Reactions
Serious hypersensitivity reactions have been reported with botulinum toxin products. Hypersensitivity reactions include anaphylaxis, serum sickness, urticaria, soft tissue edema, and dyspnea. If serious and/or immediate hypersensitivity reactions occur, discontinue further injection of XEOMIN and institute appropriate medical therapy immediately.
The use of XEOMIN in patients with a known hypersensitivity to any botulinum neurotoxin or to any of the excipients (human albumin, sucrose), could lead to a life-threatening allergic reaction.
Dysphagia and Breathing Difficulties Treatment with XEOMIN and other botulinum toxin products can result in swallowing or breathing difficulties. Patients with pre-existing swallowing or breathing difficulties may be more susceptible to these complications. In most cases, this is a consequence of weakening of muscles in the area of injection that are involved in breathing or swallowing.
When distant effects occur, additional respiratory muscles may be involved. Deaths as a complication of severe dysphagia have been reported after treatment with botulinum toxin. Dysphagia may persist for several months, and require use of a feeding tube to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration.
Aspiration may result from severe dysphagia, and is a particular risk when treating patients in whom swallowing or respiratory function is already compromised. Treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxins may weaken neck muscles that serve as accessory muscles of ventilation. This may result in critical loss of breathing capacity in patients with respiratory disorders who may have become dependent upon these accessory muscles.
There have been post-marketing reports of serious breathing difficulties, including respiratory failure, in patients with cervical dystonia treated with botulinum toxin products. Patients with smaller neck muscle mass and patients who require bilateral injections into the sternocleidomastoid muscles have been reported to be at greater risk of dysphagia. In general, limiting the dose injected into the sternocleidomastoid muscle may decrease the occurrence of dysphagia.
Patients treated with botulinum toxin may require immediate medical attention should they develop problems with swallowing, speech or respiratory disorders. These reactions can occur within hours to weeks after injection with botulinum toxin. Patients with neuromuscular disorders with peripheral motor neuropathic diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or neuromuscular junctional disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome) may be at increased risk for severe dysphagia and respiratory compromise from typical doses of XEOMIN.
Corneal Exposure, Corneal Ulceration, and Ectropion in Patients Treated for Blepharospasm Reduced blinking from injection of botulinum toxin products in the orbicularis muscle can lead to corneal exposure, persistent epithelial defect, and corneal ulceration, especially in patients with VII nerve disorders. As patients with previous eye surgery may have reduced corneal sensation, carefully assess corneal sensation before treatment. Vigorous treatment of any corneal epithelial defect should be employed.
This may require protective drops, ointment, therapeutic soft contact lenses, or closure of the eye by patching or other means. Because of its anticholinergic effects, XEOMIN should be used with caution in patients at risk of developing narrow angle glaucoma. To decrease the risk for ectropion, XEOMIN should not be injected into the medial lower eyelid area.
Ecchymosis easily occurs in the soft tissues of the eyelid. Immediate gentle pressure at the injection site can limit the size.
Risk of Ptosis in Patients Treated for Glabellar Lines
Do not exceed the recommended dosage and frequency of administration of XEOMIN. In order to reduce the complication of ptosis the following steps should be taken: Avoid injection near the levator palpebrae superioris, particularly in patients with larger brow depressor complexes. Corrugator injections should be placed at least 1 cm above the bony supraorbital ridge.
Human Albumin and Transmission of Viral Diseases
This product contains albumin, a derivative of human blood. Based on effective donor screening and product manufacturing processes, it carries an extremely remote risk for transmission of viral diseases and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). There is a theoretical risk for transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), but if that risk actually exists, the risk of transmission would also be considered extremely remote.
No cases of transmission of viral diseases, CJD, or vCJD have ever been identified for licensed albumin or albumin contained in other licensed products.
Pre-existing Conditions at the Injection Site
Use caution when XEOMIN is used where the targeted muscle shows excessive weakness or atrophy. Use caution when XEOMIN is used in patients who have marked facial asymmetry, with surgical alterations to the facial anatomy, pre-existing eyelid or eyebrow ptosis, when excessive weakness or atrophy is present in the target muscles, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, thick sebaceous skin (e.g., the inability to substantially lessen glabellar lines even by physically spreading them apart).
Drug Interactions with Xeomin
Aminoglycosides and Other Agents Interfering with Neuromuscular Transmission Co-administration of XEOMIN and aminoglycosides or other agents interfering with neuromuscular transmission (e.g., tubocurarine-type muscle relaxants) should only be performed with caution as these agents may potentiate the effect of the toxin.
Anticholinergic Drugs Use of anticholinergic drugs after administration of XEOMIN may potentiate systemic anticholinergic effects.
Other Botulinum Neurotoxin Products
The effect of administering different botulinum toxin products at the same time or within several months of each other is unknown. Excessive neuromuscular weakness may be exacerbated by administration of another botulinum toxin prior to the resolution of the effects of a previously administered botulinum toxin.
Muscle Relaxants
Excessive weakness may also be exaggerated by administration of a muscle relaxant before or after administration of XEOMIN.
Pregnancy Safety for Xeomin
Pregnancy Risk Summary There are no adequate data on the developmental risk associated with the use of XEOMIN in pregnant women. XEOMIN should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. XEOMIN was embryotoxic in rats and increased abortions in rabbits when given at doses higher than the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) for cervical dystonia (120 Units), on a body weight basis.
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriages in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. The no-effect level for embryotoxicity in rats was 6 Units/kg (3 times the MRHD for cervical dystonia on a body weight basis).
In rabbits, the no-effect level for increased abortion was 2.5 Units/kg (similar to the MRHD for cervical dystonia on a body weight basis).
Pediatric Use of Xeomin
Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of Xeomin have not been established in pediatric patients for the treatment of lower limb spasticity, cervical dystonia, and blepharospasm, or the temporary improvement in the appearance of upper facial lines: moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with corrugator and/or procerus muscle activity moderate to severe horizontal forehead lines associated with frontalis muscle activity moderate to severe lateral canthal lines associated with orbicularis oculi muscle activity. Chronic Sialorrhea in Pediatric Patients The safety and effectiveness of Xeomin have been established by evidence from an adequate and well-controlled study of Xeomin in patients 6 to 17 years of age with chronic sialorrhea. Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients below the age of 2 years have not been established.
Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients The safety and effectiveness of Xeomin for the treatment of upper limb spasticity have been established by evidence from an adequate and well-controlled study of Xeomin in pediatric patients 2 to 17 years of age. Juvenile Animal Toxicity Data In a study in which juvenile rats received intramuscular injections of Xeomin Units/kg every other week from postnatal day 21 for 10 weeks, decreased limb use, decreased body weight gain, skeletal muscle atrophy, and decreased bone growth and density were observed at all doses. Male reproductive organ histopathology (atrophy of the germinal epithelium of the testis, associated with hypospermia) was observed at the mid and high doses, and mating behavior was impaired at the high dose.
A no-effect dose for adverse effects on development in juvenile animals was not established. The lowest dose tested (5 Units/kg) is less than the human dose of 400 Units on a body weight (kg) basis.
Contraindications for Xeomin
XEOMIN is contraindicated in patients with: Known hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin product or to any of the components in the formulation. Infection at the proposed injection site(s) because it could lead to severe local or disseminated infection. Known hypersensitivity to the active substance botulinum neurotoxin type A or to any of the excipients Infection at the proposed injection sites
Overdosage Information for Xeomin
Excessive doses of XEOMIN may be expected to produce neuromuscular weakness with a variety of symptoms, particularly when treated intramuscularly. Respiratory support may be required where excessive doses cause paralysis of the respiratory muscles. In the event of overdose, the patient should be medically monitored for symptoms of excessive muscle weakness or muscle paralysis.
Symptomatic treatment may be necessary. Symptoms of overdose are not likely to be present immediately following injection. Should accidental injection or oral ingestion occur, the person should be medically supervised for several weeks for signs and symptoms of excessive muscle weakness or paralysis.
There is no significant information regarding overdose from clinical studies of XEOMIN. In the event of overdose, antitoxin raised against botulinum toxin is available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, GA. However, the antitoxin will not reverse any botulinum toxin-induced effects already apparent by the time of antitoxin administration.
In the event of suspected or actual cases of botulinum toxin poisoning, please contact your local or state Health Department to process a request for antitoxin through the CDC. If you do not receive a response within 30 minutes, please contact the CDC directly at 770-488-7100. More information can be obtained at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/srp/drugs/formulary.html#1a.
Clinical Studies of Xeomin
Chronic Sialorrhea Chronic Sialorrhea in Adult Patients
The efficacy and safety of XEOMIN for the treatment of chronic sialorrhea in adult patients were evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (NCT02091739) that enrolled a total of 184 patients with chronic sialorrhea resulting from Parkinson's disease, atypical parkinsonism, stroke, or traumatic brain injury, that was present for at least three months. Patients with a history of aspiration pneumonia, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, salivary gland or duct malformation, and gastroesophageal reflux disease were excluded. The study consisted of a 16-week main phase, followed by an extension period of dose-blinded treatment with XEOMIN.
In the main phase, a fixed total dose of XEOMIN (100 Units or 75 Units) or placebo was administered into the parotid and submandibular salivary glands in a 3:2 dose ratio. The co-primary efficacy variables were the change in unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (uSFR, Table 15) and the change in Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS, Table 16) at Week 4 post-injection. A total of 173 treated patients completed the main phase of the study.
For both the uSFR and GICS, XEOMIN 100 Units was significantly better than placebo (see Table 15 and Table 16 ). XEOMIN 75 Units was not significantly better than placebo. Table 15: Mean Change in uSFR (g/min) from Baseline at Week of Main Phase In the extension period, patients received up to three additional treatments with XEOMIN 100 Units or 75 Units every 16±2 weeks, for a total exposure duration of up to 64 weeks.
Patients had periodic dental examinations to monitor for changes in dentition and oral mucosa. A total of 151 patients completed the extension period. Chronic Sialorrhea in Pediatric Patients The efficacy and safety of XEOMIN for the treatment of chronic sialorrhea in pediatric patients were evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (ages 6-17 years), parallel-group, multicenter trial (NCT02270736) that enrolled and treated a total of 216 pediatric patients 6-17 years of age with chronic sialorrhea associated with cerebral palsy, other genetic or congenital disorders, or traumatic brain injury.
An additional 35 patients 2-5 years of age were treated with open-label XEOMIN in that study. The study consisted of a 16-week main phase, followed by an open-label extension period of treatment with XEOMIN where patients could receive up to 3 additional treatments with XEOMIN every 16 ± 2 weeks, for a total exposure duration of up to 64 weeks (222 patients completed the extension period). In the main phase, patients 6-17 years of age were administered a total dose of XEOMIN according to body weight (up to 75 Units), or placebo, into the parotid and submandibular glands in a 3:2 dose ratio, using ultrasound guidance.
Patients 2-5 years of age all received open-label treatment with XEOMIN, according to body weight, using ultrasound guidance. Patients with a body weight <12 kg were excluded. The primary efficacy analysis was conducted in the 6-17 years of age patient group.
The co-primary endpoints were the change in unstimulated Salivary Flow Rate (uSFR, Table 17) and carer's Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS, Table 18) at Week 4 post-injection. For both the uSFR and GICS, XEOMIN was statistically significantly better than placebo (see Table 17 and Table 18 ). Table 17: Mean change in uSFR (g/min) from Baseline at Week of Main Phase Efficacy in pediatric patients 2 to 5 years of age is extrapolated from the finding of efficacy in older pediatric patients.
Upper Limb Spasticity Upper Limb Spasticity in Adult Patients The efficacy and safety of XEOMIN for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in adult patients were evaluated in two Phase 3, randomized, multi-center, double-blind studies. Study 1 (NCT01392300) and Study 2 (NCT00432666) were both prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-center trials with an open-label extension period (OLEX) to investigate the efficacy and safety of XEOMIN in the treatment of post-stroke spasticity of the upper limb. For patients who had previously received botulinum toxin treatment in any body region, Study 1 and Study 2 required that ≥12 months and ≥4 months, respectively, had passed since the most recent botulinum toxin administration.
Study 1 consisted of a 12-week main phase followed by three 12-week OLEX treatment cycles for a total exposure duration of 48 weeks. The study included 317 treatment-naïve patients who were at least three months post-stroke in the main study period (210 XEOMIN and 107 placebo). During the main period, XEOMIN (fixed total dose of 400 Units) and placebo were administered intramuscularly to the defined primary target clinical pattern chosen from among the flexed elbow, flexed wrist, or clenched fist patterns and to other affected muscle groups. 296 treated patients completed the main phase and participated in the first OLEX cycle.
Each OLEX cycle consisted of a single treatment session (XEOMIN 400 Units total dose, distributed among all affected muscles) followed by a 12-week observation period. The study included 148 treatment-naïve and pre-treated patients with a confirmed diagnosis of post-stroke spasticity of the upper limb who were at least six months post-stroke (73 XEOMIN and 75 placebo). During the main period, for each patient, the clinical patterns of flexed wrist and clenched fist were treated with fixed doses (90 Units and 80 Units, respectively).
Additionally, if other upper limb spasticity patterns were present, the elbow, forearm and thumb muscles could be treated with fixed doses of XEOMIN per muscle. 145 patients completed the main phase and participated in the OLEX period, during which time the dosing of each involved muscle could be adapted individually. During the main and OLEX periods, the maximum total dose per treatment session and 12-week interval was 400 Units. The average XEOMIN doses injected into specific muscles and the number of injection sites per muscle in Study 1 and Study 2 are presented in Table 19.
Table 19: Doses Administered to Individual Muscles (Main Period) in Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Study 1 and Study 2 Intent to Treat (ITT) In Study 1, the primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in Ashworth Scale (AS) score of the primary target clinical pattern determined by the investigator at the Week 4 visit. The Ashworth Scale is a clinical measure of the severity of spasticity by judging resistance to passive movement. The spasticity of the elbow flexors, wrist flexors, finger flexors, and thumb muscles as well as the forearm pronators was assessed on the 0 to 4-point Ashworth scale at each visit.
The co-primary efficacy variable of Study 1 was the Investigator's Global Impression of Change Scales (GICS) after 4 Weeks of treatment with XEOMIN or placebo. The GICS is a global measure of a subject's functional improvement. Investigators were asked to evaluate the subject's global change in spasticity of the upper limb due to treatment, compared to the condition before the last injection.
The response was assessed using a 7-point Likert scale that ranges from –3 (very much worse) to +3 (very much improved). XEOMIN was considered to be superior to placebo in Study 1 only if statistical significance was reached in both the AS and GICS variables. The primary efficacy results are displayed in Table 20.
Figure 8: Investigator's GICS in Adult Upper Limb Spasticity Study 1 Figure 8 Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Study 1 (NCT02002884) was a prospective, double-blind, dose-response, randomized, multi-center trial with an open-label extension period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XEOMIN for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in pediatric patients. For treatment of flexed elbow, injection of biceps brachii was mandatory. The investigator could select 1 of the 2 other muscles contributing to spasticity of elbow flexion (i.e., brachialis and brachioradialis) for injection.
For patients needing treatment for a flexed wrist, both the flexor carpi radialis and flexor carpi ulnaris were injected. In the absence of a placebo control, the efficacy of the 2 Units/kg dosage of XEOMIN could not be evaluated in Study 1. The co-primary efficacy variables in Study 1 were the change from baseline on the Ashworth Scale for the primary clinical target pattern (i.e., elbow flexors or wrist flexors), and the Investigator's Global Impression of Change Scale (GICS), both at Week 4.
As displayed in Table 21, the change from baseline in Ashworth Scale score was significantly greater for patients treated with XEOMIN 8 Units/kg than for patients treated with XEOMIN 2 Units/kg. The difference in GICS score between patients treated with XEOMIN 8 Units/kg and those treated with XEOMIN 2 Units/kg did not reach statistical significance. However, the clinical meaningfulness of the difference in Ashworth Scale score change between patients treated with XEOMIN 8 Units/kg and those treated with XEOMIN 2 Units/kg was established by a responder analysis, in which the proportion of patients with a 1-point change or greater on the Ashworth Scale was examined.
There was no significant difference in change from baseline in Ashworth Scale score, GICS score, or proportion of responders between patients treated with XEOMIN 6 Units/kg and those treated with XEOMIN 2 Units/kg. Therefore, the efficacy of a 6 Units/kg dosage of XEOMIN for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in pediatric patients was not established in Study 1. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of predominantly rotational cervical dystonia, with baseline Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) total score ≥20, TWSTRS severity score ≥10, TWSTRS disability score ≥3, and TWSTRS pain score ≥1.
For patients who had previously received a botulinum toxin treatment for cervical dystonia, the trial required that ≥10 weeks had passed since the most recent botulinum toxin administration. Patients with swallowing disorders or any significant neuromuscular disease that might interfere with the study were excluded from enrollment. Patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive a single administration of XEOMIN 240 Units (n=81), XEOMIN 120 Units (n=78), or placebo (n=74).
Each patient received a single administration of 4.8 mL of reconstituted study agent (XEOMIN 240 Units, XEOMIN 120 Units, or placebo). The investigator at each site decided which muscles would receive injections of the study agent, the number of injection sites, and the volume at each site. The muscles most frequently injected were the splenius capitis/semispinalis, trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, scalene, and levator scapulae muscles.
Table 22 indicates the average XEOMIN dose, and percentage of total dose, injected into specific muscles in the pivotal clinical trial. Table 22: XEOMIN 120 Units Initial Dose (Units and % of the Total Dose) by Unilateral Muscle Injected During Double Blind Pivotal Phase 3 Study injections into the selected muscles. Patients were assessed by telephone at one week post-injection, during clinic visits at Weeks 4 and 8, and then by telephone assessments or clinic visits every two weeks up to Week 20.
The mean age of the study patients was 53 years, 66% of the patients were women, and 91% were White. At study baseline, 61% of patients had previously received a botulinum toxin as treatment for cervical dystonia. The study was completed by 94% of study patients.
Three patients discontinued the study prematurely due to adverse events: two patients in the 240 Unit group experienced musculoskeletal pain and muscle weakness, and one patient in the 120 Unit group experienced nausea and dizziness. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the TWSTRS total score from baseline to Week 4 post-injection, in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, with missing values replaced by the patient's baseline value. TWSTRS evaluates the severity of dystonia, patient-perceived disability from dystonia, and pain, with a range of possible scores from 0 to 85.
The mean change in the total TWSTRS score was significantly greater for both XEOMIN groups than for the placebo group (Table 23). Table 23: Change in TWSTRS Score at Week 4 in Patients with Cervical Dystonia (Double Blind Pivotal Phase 3 Study) The efficacy of XEOMIN was similar in patients who were botulinum toxin naïve and those who had received botulinum toxin prior to this study. Examination of age and gender subgroups did not identify differences in response to XEOMIN among these subgroups.
Blepharospasm Treatment-Naïve Patients
The efficacy and safety of XEOMIN for the treatment of blepharospasm in treatment-naïve patients were evaluated in Study 1 (NCT01896895), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial in a total of 61 patients. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of blepharospasm, with a baseline Jankovic Rating Scale (JRS) severity subscore ≥2. Patients were defined as treatment-naïve if at least 12 months had passed since their last botulinum toxin treatment for blepharospasm.
Of the 61 patients randomized, 55 patients completed the placebo-controlled phase. Patients only continued to the open-label extension (OLEX) period if they had a confirmed need for a re-injection by week 20 of the placebo-controlled phase. A total of 39 patients entered and completed the OLEX phase.
The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in JRS Severity subscore determined at Week 6 after the injection. The 50 Unit treatment group demonstrated statistically significant improvements compared to placebo, with a difference of -1.2 (p=0.0004). The change from baseline in the JRS Severity subscore for the 25 Unit treatment group 6 weeks after the injection was not statistically significant, with a difference of -0.5 (p=0.1452) compared to placebo (see Figure 9 ).
Figure 9: Frequency Distribution of Changes from Baseline JRS Severity Subscore at Week 6 for Treatment-Naïve Patients Figure 9 Pre-Treated Patients The efficacy and safety of XEOMIN for the treatment of blepharospasm patients pre-treated with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) were evaluated in Study 2 (NCT00406367), a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial in a total of 109 patients. Patients had a clinical diagnosis of benign essential blepharospasm, with baseline JRS Severity subscore ≥2, and a stable satisfactory therapeutic response to previous administrations of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox). At least 10 weeks had to have elapsed since the most recent onabotulinumtoxinA administration.
Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive a single administration of XEOMIN (n=75) or placebo (n=34). Each patient in the XEOMIN group received a XEOMIN treatment (dose, volume, dilution, and injection sites per muscle) that was similar to the most recent onabotulinumtoxinA injection sessions prior to study entry. The highest dose permitted in this study was 100 Units (50 Units per eye); the mean XEOMIN dose was 33 Units per eye.
In Table 24 the most frequently injected sites, the median dose per injection site, and the median number (and range) of injection sites per eye are presented. Table 24: Median Dose and Median Number of Injection Sites per Eye (Blepharospasm) Patients were assessed during clinic visits at Weeks 3 and 6, and then by telephone or at clinic visits every two weeks up to Week 20. The mean age of the study patients was 62 years, 65% of the patients were women, and 83% were White.
Approximately one third of patients had other dystonic phenomena; in all but 1% this was limited to facial, cervical, perioral and mandibular muscles. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the JRS Severity subscore from baseline to Week 6 post-injection, in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, with missing values replaced by the patient's most recent value (i.e., last observation carried forward). In the ITT population, the difference between the XEOMIN group and the placebo group in the change of the JRS Severity subscore from baseline to Week points.
Comparison of the XEOMIN group to the placebo group was statistically significant at p<0.001. Figure 10
Upper Facial Lines (Glabellar Lines, Horizontal Forehead Lines, and Lateral Canthal Lines) Two randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled clinical trials, Trial 1071 (NCT04594213) and Trial 1070 (NCT04622254), were conducted to evaluate XEOMIN for use in the simultaneous intramuscular treatment of upper facial lines (GL, HFL, and LCL). Each trial included an extension period with two additional open-label treatment cycles. In these two trials a total of 730 adult subjects with GL, HFL, and LCL of at least moderate severity at maximum frown as assessed by the investigator and subject were randomized and treated.
In Trial 1071, a total of 362 subjects were randomized and treated. In Trial 1070, a total of 368 subjects were randomized and treated. The mean age of the 730 treated and randomized subjects was 46.5 years.
The majority of subjects were female (84%) and White (92%). Fifteen percent (15%) of subjects identified as Hispanic or Latino. For both trials, the severity of upper facial lines (GL, HFL, and LCL) was assessed at maximum contraction using the 5-point photonumerical Merz Aesthetic Scales (MAS; 0=none, 1= mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe).
The MAS assessment was performed independently by both investigators and subjects. The primary timepoint was Day 30 following the first treatment. For each upper facial area (GL, HFL, or LCL), treatment success was defined as a score of 0 (none) or 1 (mild) and at least two-grade improvement from baseline to Day 30 as rated on the corresponding scale for GL, HFL, and LCL at maximum contraction as assessed by both the investigator and the subject.
The percentage of subjects with treatment success in each treatment area is presented in Table 25. Table 25. Treatment Success at Day 30 in Adults with Upper Facial Lines Glabellar Lines Two identically designed randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo controlled clinical trials (Studies GL-1 and GL-2) were conducted to evaluate XEOMIN for use in the temporary improvement of moderate to severe glabellar lines.
The trials enrolled 547 healthy adult patients with glabellar lines of at least moderate severity at maximum frown. Three hundred sixty six subjects were treated with 20 Units of XEOMIN and 181 subjects received placebo. Subjects were excluded if they had marked ptosis, deep dermal scarring, or an inability to lessen glabellar lines, even by physically spreading them apart.
The mean age of trial subjects was 46 years. The trial subjects received either 20 Units of XEOMIN or an equal amount of placebo. The total dose was delivered in 5 equally divided intramuscular injections of 4 Units each to specific sites (see Figure 7 ).
Subjects were followed up for 120 days. Investigators and subjects assessed efficacy at maximum frown on Day 30 of treatment using a 4-point scale (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Composite treatment success was defined as a 2-grade improvement on this scale compared to baseline for both the investigator's and subject's assessments on Day 30.
The percentage of subjects with treatment success was greater on the XEOMIN arm than the placebo arm at Day 30 in both trials (see Table 26 ). Table 26: Treatment Success at Day 30 (at Least 2 Grades Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown) in Adults with
| XEOMIN 100 Units | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| N=73 | N=36 | |
| Week 4 p=0.004 | -0.13 | -0.04 |
| Week 8 | -0.13 | -0.02 |
| Week 12 | -0.12 | -0.03 |
| Week 16 | -0.11 | -0.01 |
| XEOMIN 100 Units | Placebo | |
|---|---|---|
| N=74 | N=36 | |
| Week 4 p=0.002 | 1.25 | 0.67 |
| Week 8 | 1.30 | 0.47 |
| Week 12 | 1.21 | 0.56 |
| Week 16 | 0.93 | 0.41 |
| XEOMIN (6-17 years) N = 148 | Placebo (6-17 years) N=72 | |
|---|---|---|
| Week 4 p=0.0012 | -0.14 | -0.07 |
| Week 8 | -0.16 | -0.07 |
| Week 12 | -0.16 | -0.06 |
| Week 16 | -0.15 | -0.08 |
| XEOMIN (6-17 years) N = 148 | Placebo (6-17 years) N=72 | |
|---|---|---|
| Week 4 p=0.0320 | 0.91 | 0.63 |
| Week 8 | 0.94 | 0.54 |
| Week 12 | 0.87 | 0.47 |
| Week 16 | 0.77 | 0.38 |
| Muscle Group | Muscle | Study 1 Units Injected | Injection Site Per Muscle | Study 2 Units Injected | Injection Site Per Muscle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XEOMIN (N=210) Mean±SD | XEOMIN Median (Min; Max) | XEOMIN (N=73) Mean±SD | XEOMIN Median (Min; Max) | ||
| All | Overall | 400 ± 2 Units | -- | 307 ± 77 Units | -- |
| Elbow flexors | Overall | 151 ± 50 Units | 5 (1; 11) | 142 ± 30 Units | 5 (2; 9) |
| Biceps | 90 ± 21 Units | 3 (1; 4) | 80 ± 0 Units | 3 (2; 4) | |
| Brachialis | 52 ± 26 Units | 2 (1; 4) | 50 ± 0 Units | 2 (1; 2) | |
| Brachioradialis | 43 ± 16 Units | 2 (1; 3) | 60 ± 2Units | 2 (1; 3) | |
| Wrist flexors | Overall | 112 ± 43 Units | 4 (1; 6) | 90 ± 0 Units | 4 (4; 4) |
| Flexor carpi radialis | 58 ± 22 Units | 2 (1; 3) | 50 ± 0 Units | 2 (2; 2) | |
| Flexor carpi ulnaris | 56 ± 22 Units | 2 (1; 3) | 40 ± 0 Units | 2 (2; 2) | |
| Finger flexors | Overall | 104 ± 35 Units | 4 (1; 4) | 80 ± 0 Units | 4 (4; 4) |
| Flexor digitorum profundus | 54 ± 19 Units | 2 (1; 2) | 40 ± 0 Units | 2 (2; 2) | |
| Flexor digitorum superficialis | 54 ± 19 Units | 2 (1; 2) | 40 ± 0 Units | 2 (2; 2) | |
| Forearm pronators | Overall | 52 ± 24 Units | 2 (1; 3) | 47 ± 16 Units | 2 (1; 3) |
| Pronator quadratus | 26 ± 13 Units | 1 (1; 1) | 25 ± 0 Units | 1 (1; 1) | |
| Pronator teres | 42 ± 13 Units | 1 (1; 2) | 40 ± 0 Units | 1.5 (1; 2) | |
| Thumb flexors/ adductors | Overall | 37 ± 25 Units | 2 (1; 4) | 25 ± 10 Units | 1.5 (1; 3) |
| Adductor pollicis | 14 ± 8 Units | 1 (1; 1) | 10 ± 0 Units | 1 (1; 1) | |
| Flexor pollicis brevis / opponens pollicis | 14 ± 9 Units | 1 (1; 1) | 10 ± 0 Units | 1 (1; 1) | |
| Flexor pollicis longus | 26 ± 16 Units | 1 (1; 2) | 20 ± 0 Units | 1 (1; 1) |
| Mean Change in Ashworth Scale | ||
|---|---|---|
| XEOMIN (N=171) | Placebo (N=88) | |
| The analysis is based on Last Observation Carried Forward in the Intent To Treat population. p<0.001 | ||
| Total Primary Target Clinical Pattern (flexed wrist, flexed elbow, and clenched fist) | -0.9 | -0.5 |
| XEOMIN 2 Units/kg (N=87) | XEOMIN 8 Units/kg (N=176) | |
|---|---|---|
| LS = Least Square Mean difference | ||
| CI = Confidence Interval | ||
| Ashworth Scale | ||
| Mean Change from Baseline at Week 4 | -0.9 | -1.2 |
| LS Mean Difference versus XEOMIN 2 Units/kg (95% CIs) | -- | -0.22 p-value versus low dose group <0.05 (-0.40, -0.04) |
| GICS | ||
| Mean at Week 4 | 1.6 | 1.7 |
| LS Mean Difference versus XEOMIN 2 Units/kg (95% CIs) | -- | 0.09 (-0.10, 0.28) |
| XEOMIN Dose Injected | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients Injected Per Muscle | Median XEOMIN Units | 75 th percentile XEOMIN Units | |
| Sternocleidomastoid | 63 | 25 | 35 |
| Splenius capitis/ Semispinalis capitis | 78 | 48 | 63 |
| Trapezius | 55 | 25 | 38 |
| Levator scapulae | 49 | 25 | 25 |
| Scalenus (medius and anterior) | 27 | 20 | 25 |
| TWSTRS Assessment | XEOMIN 240 Units (N=78) | XEOMIN 120 Units (N=81) | Placebo (N =74) |
|---|---|---|---|
| SD = Standard Deviation, CI = Confidence Interval. | |||
| Total TWSTRS at baseline | 42.1 | 42.6 | 41.8 |
| Total TWSTRS at Week 4 | 31.2 | 32.7 | 39.5 |
| Mean (SD) Change in TWSTRS score from baseline to Week 4 | -10.9 (11.7) | -9.9 (10.4) | -2.2 (7.3) |
| Mean difference from placebo (95% CI) | -9.0 (-12.0, -5.9) | -7.5 (-10.4, -4.6) | |
| p-value p-value(s) are from ANCOVA model. versus placebo | <0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Injection Area | Median Units XEOMIN | Median Number of Injection Sites (Min-Max) |
|---|---|---|
| Temporal Area | 13 | 2 (1 – 6) |
| Eyebrow Area | 5 | 1 (1 – 4) |
| Upper Lid Area | 10 | 2 (1 – 4) |
| Lower Lid Area | 8 | 2 (1 – 3) |
| Orbital Rim | 5 | 1 (1 – 3) |
| Trial 1071 | Trial 1070 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XEOMIN (20 Units GL/ 20 Units HFL/ 24 Units LCL) | XEOMIN (20 Units GL/ 20 Units HFL) | Placebo | XEOMIN (20 Units GL/ 20 Units HFL/ 24 Units LCL) | XEOMIN (24 Units LCL) N=90 | Placebo | |
| N=179 | N=91 | N=94 | ||||
| N=92 | N=184 | |||||
| GL | 53% | 53% | 0% | 49% | - | 0% |
| HFL | 67% | 62% | 0% | 58% | - | 0% |
| LCL | 53% | - | 0% | 33% | 24% | 0% |
| GL-1 | GL-2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XEOMIN (N=184) | Placebo (N=92) | XEOMIN (N=182) | Placebo (N=89) | |
| Composite Treatment Success Success on both the Investigator and Subject Assessments | 111 (60%) | 0 (0%) | 87 (48%) | 0 (0%) |
| Investigator Assessment | 141 (77%) | 0 (0%) | 129 (71%) | 0 (0%) |
| Subject Assessment | 120 (65%) | 0 (0%) | 101 (55%) | 1 (1%) |
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Xeomin?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Xeomin Prices