Vibativ Drug Information

Generic name: TELAVANCIN HYDROCHLORIDE

Save on Vibativ at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Vibativ

Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

VIBATIV is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) caused by susceptible isolates of the following Gram-positive microorganisms: Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates), Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus anginosus group (includes S. anginosus, S. intermedius, and S. constellatus), or Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycinsusceptible isolates only).

HABP/VABP

VIBATIV is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), caused by susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus (both methicillin-susceptible and -resistant isolates). VIBATIV should be reserved for use when alternative treatments are not suitable.

Usage Combination therapy may be clinically indicated if the documented or presumed

pathogens include Gram-negative organisms. Appropriate specimens for bacteriological examination should be obtained in order to isolate and identify the causative pathogens and to determine their susceptibility to telavancin. VIBATIV may be initiated as empiric therapy before results of these tests are known.

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of VIBATIV and other antibacterial drugs, VIBATIV should be used only to treat infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy. In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy.

Dosage & Administration of Vibativ

aCalculate using the Cockcroft-Gault formula and ideal body weight (IBW). Use actual body weight if < IBW. (12.3)
Creatinine Clearancea (CrCl) (mL/min)VIBATIV Dosage Regimen
>5010 mg/kg every 24 hours
30-507.5 mg/kg every 24 hours
10-<3010 mg/kg every 48 hours

Side Effects of Vibativ

Clinical Trials Experience Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections

The two Phase 3 cSSSI clinical trials (Trial 1 and Trial 2) for VIBATIV included 929 adult patients treated with VIBATIV at 10 mg/kg IV once daily. The mean age of patients treated with VIBATIV was 49 years (range 18-96). There was a slight male predominance (56%) in patients treated with VIBATIV, and patients were predominantly Caucasian (78%). In the cSSSI clinical trials, <1% (8/929) patients who received VIBATIV died and <1% (8/938) patients treated with vancomycin died. Serious adverse events were reported in 7% (69/929) of patients treated with VIBATIV and most commonly included renal, respiratory, or cardiac events.

Serious adverse events were reported in 5% (43/938) of vancomycin-treated patients, and most commonly included cardiac, respiratory, or infectious events. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 8% (72/929) of patients treated with VIBATIV, the most common events being nausea and rash (~1% each). Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 6% (53/938) of vancomycin-treated patients, the most common events being rash and pruritus (~1% each). The most common adverse events occurring in ≥10% of VIBATIV-treated patients observed in the VIBATIV Phase 3 cSSSI trials were taste disturbance, nausea, vomiting, and foamy urine. Table 4 displays the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions reported in ≥2% of patients treated with VIBATIV possibly related to the drug.

Table 4: Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Drug Reactions Reported in ≥2% of Patients Treated in cSSSI Trial 1 and Trial 2 *Described as metallic or soapy taste. VIBATIV (N=929) Vancomycin (N=938) Body as a Whole Rigors 4% 2% Digestive System Nausea 27% 15% Vomiting 14% 7% Diarrhea 7% 8% Metabolic and Nutritional Decreased appetite 3% 2% Nervous System Taste disturbance * 33% 7% Renal System Foamy urine 13% 3% HABP/VABP Two randomized, double-blind Phase 3 trials (Trial 1 and Trial 2) for VIBATIV included 1,503 adult patients treated with VIBATIV at 10 mg/kg IV once daily or vancomycin at 1 g IV twice daily. The mean age of patients treated with VIBATIV was 62 years (range 18-100) with 69% of the patients white and 65% male.

In the combined VIBATIV group, 29% were VAP and 71% were HAP patients. Table 5 summarizes deaths using Kaplan-Meier estimates at Day 28 as stratified by baseline creatinine clearance categorized into four groups. Patients with pre-existing moderate/severe renal impairment (CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min) who were treated with VIBATIV for HABP/VABP had increased mortality observed versus vancomycin in both the trials.

Table 5: 28-Day Mortality* Stratified by Baseline Creatinine Clearance- All-Treated Analysis Population *(Kaplan-Meier Estimates) CrCl (mL/min) Trial 1 Trial 2 VIBATIV N (%) Vancomycin N (%) Difference (95% CI) VIBATIV N (%) Vancomycin N (%) Difference (95% CI) >80 143 (12.2%) 152 (14.1%) -1.8 (-9.6, 6.0) 181 (10.5%) 181 (18.7%) -8.2 (-15.5, -0.9) >50-80 88 (27.4%) 88 (17.7%) 9.7 (-2.7, 22.1) 96 (25.6%) 90 (27.1%) -1.5 (-14.4, 11.3) 30-50 80 (34.7%) 83 (23.1%) 11.5 (-2.5, 25.5) 62 (27.7%) 68 (23.7%) 4.0 (-11.1, 19.1) <30 61 (44.3%) 51 (37.3%) 7.0 (-11.2, 25.2) 38 (61.1%) 41 (42.1%) 19.0 (-2.9, 40.8) Serious adverse events were reported in 31% of patients treated with VIBATIV and 26% of patients who received vancomycin. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 8% (60/751) of patients who received VIBATIV, the most common events being acute renal failure and electrocardiogram QTc interval prolonged (~1% each). Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 5% (40/752) of vancomycin-patients, the most common events being septic shock and multi-organ failure (<1%). Table 6 displays the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse drug reactions reported in ≥ 5% of HABP/VABP patients treated with VIBATIV possibly related to the drug. Table 6: Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Drug Reactions Reported in ≥5% of Patients Treated in HABP/VABP Trial 1 and Trial 2 VIBATIV (N=751) Vancomycin (N=752) Nausea 5% 4% Vomiting 5% 4% Renal Failure Acute 5% 4% Nephrotoxicity Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections In cSSSI trials, the incidence of renal adverse events indicative of renal impairment (increased serum creatinine, renal impairment, renal insufficiency, and/or renal failure) was 30/929 (3%) of VIBATIV-treated patients compared with 10/938 (1%) of vancomycin-treated patients.

In 17 of the 30 VIBATIV-treated patients, these adverse events had not completely resolved by the end of the trials, compared with 6 of the 10 vancomycin-treated patients. Serious adverse events indicative of renal impairment occurred in 11/929 (1%) of VIBATIV-treated patients compared with 3/938 (0.3%) of vancomycin-treated patients. Twelve patients treated with VIBATIV discontinued treatment due to adverse events indicative of renal impairment compared with 2 patients treated with vancomycin.

Increases in serum creatinine to 1.5 times baseline occurred more frequently among VIBATIV-treated patients with normal baseline serum creatinine (15%) compared with vancomycin-treated patients with normal baseline serum creatinine (7%). Fifteen of 174 (9%) VIBATIV-treated patients ≥65 years of age had adverse events indicative of renal impairment compared with 16 of 755 patients (2%) <65 years of age. Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia In the HABP/VABP trials, the incidence of renal adverse events (increased serum creatinine, renal impairment, renal insufficiency, and/or renal failure) was 10% for VIBATIV vs. 8% for vancomycin. Of the patients who had at least one renal adverse event, 54% in each treatment group recovered completely, recovered with sequelae, or were improving from the renal AE at the last visit.

Three percent of VIBATIV-treated patients and 2% of vancomycintreated patients experienced at least one serious renal adverse event. Renal adverse events resulted in discontinuation of study medication in 14 VIBATIV-treated patients (2%) and 7 vancomycin-treated patients (1%). Increases in serum creatinine to 1.5 times baseline occurred more frequently among VIBATIV-treated patients (16%) compared with vancomycin-treated patients (10%). Forty-four of 399 (11.0%) VIBATIV-treated patients ≥ 65 years of age had adverse events indicative of renal impairment compared with 30 of 352 patients (8%) <65 years of age.

Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of VIBATIV. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Serious hypersensitivity reactions have been reported after first or subsequent doses of VIBATIV, including anaphylactic reactions. It is unknown if patients with hypersensitivity reactions to vancomycin will experience crossreactivity to telavancin.

Warnings & Cautions for Vibativ

Increased Mortality in Patients with

HABP/VABP and Pre-existing Moderate to Severe Renal Impairment (CrCl ≤50 mL/min) In the analysis of patients (classified by the treatment received) in the two combined HABP/VABP trials with preexisting moderate/severe renal impairment (CrCl ≤50 mL/min), all-cause mortality within 28 days of starting treatment was 95/241 (39%) in the VIBATIV group, compared with 72/243 (30%) in the vancomycin group. Allcause mortality at 28 days in patients without pre-existing moderate/severe renal impairment (CrCl >50 mL/min) was 86/510 (17%) in the VIBATIV group and 92/510 (18%) in the vancomycin group. Therefore, VIBATIV use in patients with baseline CrCl ≤50 mL/min should be considered only when the anticipated benefit to the patient outweighs the potential risk.

Decreased Clinical Response in Patients with cSSSI and Pre-existing Moderate/Severe Renal Impairment

(CrCl ≤50 mL/min) In a subgroup analysis of the combined cSSSI trials, clinical cure rates in the VIBATIV-treated patients were lower in patients with baseline CrCl ≤50 mL/min compared with those with CrCl >50 mL/min ( Table 2 ). A decrease of this magnitude was not observed in vancomycin-treated patients. Consider these data when selecting antibacterial therapy for use in patients with cSSSI and with baseline moderate/severe renal impairment. Table 2: Clinical Cure by Pre-existing Renal Impairment – Clinically Evaluable Population VIBATIV % (n/N) Vancomycin % (n/N) cSSSI Trials CrCl >50 mL/min 87.0% (520/598) 85.9% (524/610) CrCl ≤50 mL/min 67.4% (58/86) 82.7% (67/81)

Nephrotoxicity

In both the HABP/VABP trials and the cSSSI trials, renal adverse events were more likely to occur in patients with baseline comorbidities known to predispose patients to kidney dysfunction (pre-existing renal disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, or hypertension). The renal adverse event rates were also higher in patients who received concomitant medications known to affect kidney function (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ACE inhibitors, and loop diuretics). Monitor renal function (i.e., serum creatinine, creatinine clearance) in all patients receiving VIBATIV. Values should be obtained prior to initiation of treatment, during treatment (at 48- to 72-hour intervals or more frequently, if clinically indicated), and at the end of therapy. If renal function decreases, the benefit of continuing VIBATIV versus discontinuing and initiating therapy with an alternative agent should be assessed. In patients with renal dysfunction, accumulation of the solubilizer hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin can occur.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity

Based on findings in animal reproduction studies, VIBATIV may cause fetal harm. VIBATIV caused adverse developmental outcomes in 3 animal species at clinically relevant doses. Verify pregnancy status in females of reproductive potential prior to initiating VIBATIV. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.

Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with VIBATIV and for 2 days after the final dose.

Coagulation Test Interference

Although telavancin does not interfere with coagulation, it interfered with certain tests used to monitor coagulation ( Table 3 ), when conducted using samples drawn 0 to 18 hours after VIBATIV administration for patients being treated once every 24 hours. Blood samples for these coagulation tests should be collected as close as possible prior to a patient's next dose of VIBATIV. Blood samples for coagulation tests unaffected by VIBATIV may be collected at any time. For patients who require aPTT monitoring while being treated with VIBATIV, a non-phospholipid dependent coagulation test such as a Factor Xa (chromogenic) assay or an alternative anticoagulant not requiring aPTT monitoring may be considered.

Table 3: Coagulation Tests Affected and Unaffected by Telavancin Affected by Telavancin Unaffected by Telavancin Prothrombin time/international normalized ratio Activated partial thromboplastin time Activated clotting time Coagulation based factor X activity assay Thrombin time Whole blood (Lee-White) clotting time Platelet aggregation study Chromogenic anti-factor Xa assay Functional (chromogenic) factor X activity assay Bleeding time D-dimer Fibrin degradation products No evidence of increased bleeding risk has been observed in clinical trials with VIBATIV. Telavancin has no effect on platelet aggregation. Furthermore, no evidence of hypercoagulability has been seen, as healthy subjects receiving VIBATIV have normal levels of D-dimer and fibrin degradation products.

Hypersensitivity Reactions Serious and sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylactic reactions, may

occur after first or subsequent doses. Discontinue VIBATIV at first sign of skin rash, or any other sign of hypersensitivity. Telavancin is a semi-synthetic derivative of vancomycin; it is unknown if patients with hypersensitivity reactions to vancomycin will experience cross-reactivity to telavancin.

VIBATIV should be used with caution in patients with known hypersensitivity to vancomycin.

Infusion-Related Reactions

VIBATIV is a lipoglycopeptide antibacterial agent and should be administered over a period of 60 minutes to reduce the risk of infusion-related reactions. Rapid intravenous infusions of the glycopeptide class of antimicrobial agents can cause “Red-man Syndrome”-like reactions including: flushing of the upper body, urticaria, pruritus, or rash. Stopping or slowing the infusion may result in cessation of these reactions.

Clostridium difficile -Associated Diarrhea Clostridium difficile -associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been reported

with nearly all antibacterial agents and may range in severity from mild diarrhea to fatal colitis. Treatment with antibacterial agents alters the flora of the colon and may permit overgrowth of C. difficile. C. difficile produces toxins A and B which contribute to the development of CDAD. Hyper-toxin-producing strains of C. difficile cause increased morbidity and mortality, since these infections can be refractory to antimicrobial therapy and may require colectomy.

CDAD must be considered in all patients who present with diarrhea following antibiotic use. Careful medical history is necessary because CDAD has been reported to occur more than 2 months after the administration of antibacterial agents. If CDAD is suspected or confirmed, ongoing antibiotic use not directed against C. difficile may need to be discontinued.

Appropriate fluid and electrolyte management, protein supplementation, antibiotic treatment of C. difficile, and surgical evaluation should be instituted as clinically indicated.

Development of Drug-Resistant Bacteria Prescribing

VIBATIV in the absence of a proven or strongly suspected bacterial infection is unlikely to provide benefit to the patient and increases the risk of the development of drug-resistant bacteria. As with other antibacterial drugs, use of VIBATIV may result in overgrowth of nonsusceptible organisms, including fungi. Patients should be carefully monitored during therapy.

If superinfection occurs, appropriate measures should be taken. 5.10 QTc Prolongation In a study involving healthy volunteers, doses of 7.5 and 15 mg/kg of VIBATIV prolonged the QTc interval. Caution is warranted when prescribing VIBATIV to patients taking drugs known to prolong the QT interval. Patients with congenital long QT syndrome, known prolongation of the QTc interval, uncompensated heart failure, or severe left ventricular hypertrophy were not included in clinical trials of VIBATIV. Use of VIBATIV should be avoided in patients with these conditions.

Drug Interactions with Vibativ

Drug-Laboratory Test Interactions Effects of Telavancin on Coagulation Test Parameters Telavancin binds

to the artificial phospholipid surfaces added to common anticoagulation tests, thereby interfering with the ability of the coagulation complexes to assemble on the surface of the phospholipids and promote clotting in vitro. These effects appear to depend on the type of reagents used in commercially available assays. Thus, when measured shortly after completion of an infusion of VIBATIV, increases in the PT, INR, aPTT, and ACT have been observed.

These effects dissipate over time, as plasma concentrations of telavancin decrease. Urine Protein Tests Telavancin interferes with urine qualitative dipstick protein assays, as well as quantitative dye methods (e.g., pyrogallol red-molybdate). However, microalbumin assays are not affected and can be used to monitor urinary protein excretion during VIBATIV treatment.

Pregnancy Safety for Vibativ

Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on findings in animal reproduction studies, VIBATIV may cause fetal harm. There are no available data on VIBATIV use in pregnant women to evaluate for a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. In embryo-fetal development studies in rats, rabbits, and minipigs, telavancin demonstrated the potential to cause limb and skeletal malformations when given intravenously during the period of organogenesis at doses providing approximately 1- to 2-fold the human exposure at the maximum recommended clinical dose (see Data). Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.

The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 to 4% and 15 to 20%, respectively.

Data Animal Data In embryo-fetal development studies in rats, rabbits, and minipigs, telavancin demonstrated the potential to cause limb and skeletal malformations when given intravenously during the period of organogenesis at doses up to 150, 45, or 75 mg/kg/day, respectively. These doses resulted in exposure levels approximately 1- to 2-fold the human exposure (AUC) at the maximum recommended clinical dose. Malformations observed at <1% (but absent or at lower rates in historical or concurrent controls), included brachymelia (rats and rabbits), syndactyly (rats, minipigs), adactyly (rabbits), and polydactyly (minipigs). Additional findings in rabbits included flexed front paw and absent ulna, and in the minipigs included misshapen digits and deformed front leg.

Fetal body weights were decreased in rats. In a prenatal/perinatal development study, pregnant rats received intravenous telavancin at up to 150 mg/kg/day (approximately the same AUC as observed at the maximum clinical dose) from the start of organogenesis through lactation. Offspring showed decreases in fetal body weight and an increase in the number of stillborn pups.

Brachymelia was also observed. Developmental milestones and fertility of the pups were unaffected.

Pediatric Use of Vibativ

Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of VIBATIV have not been established in pediatric patients. In particular, there is a concern for poor clinical outcomes in pediatric patients less than one year of age due to immature renal function. Increased mortality in adult patients with HABP/VABP and renal impairment and decreased clinical response in adults with cSSSI and renal impairment were observed .

Contraindications for Vibativ

Intravenous Unfractionated Heparin Sodium Use of intravenous unfractionated heparin sodium is contraindicated

with VIBATIV administration because the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) test results are expected to be artificially prolonged for 0 to 18 hours after VIBATIV administration.

Known Hypersensitivity to

VIBATIV VIBATIV is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity to telavancin.

Overdosage Information for Vibativ

In the event of overdosage, VIBATIV should be discontinued and supportive care is advised with maintenance of glomerular filtration and careful monitoring of renal function. Following administration of a single dose of VIBATIV 7.5 mg/kg to subjects with end-stage renal disease, approximately 5.9% of the administered dose of telavancin was recovered in the dialysate following 4 hours of hemodialysis. However, no information is available on the use of hemodialysis to treat an overdosage.

The clearance of telavancin by continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) was evaluated in an in vitro study. Telavancin was cleared by CVVH and the clearance of telavancin increased with increasing ultrafiltration rate. However, the clearance of telavancin by CVVH has not been evaluated in a clinical study; thus, the clinical significance of this finding and use of CVVH to treat an overdosage is unknown.

Clinical Studies of Vibativ

Complicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections Adult patients with clinically documented complicated

skin and skin structure infections (cSSSI) were enrolled in two randomized, multinational, multicenter, double-blinded trials (Trial 1 and Trial 2) comparing VIBATIV (10 mg/kg IV every 24 hours) with vancomycin (1 g IV every 12 hours) for 7 to 14 days. Vancomycin dosages could be adjusted per site-specific practice. Patients could receive concomitant aztreonam or metronidazole for suspected Gram-negative and anaerobic infection, respectively.

These trials were identical in design, enrolling approximately 69% of their patients from the United States. The trials enrolled adult patients with cSSSI with suspected or confirmed MRSA as the primary cause of infection. The all-treated efficacy (ATe) population included all patients who received any amount of study medication according to their randomized treatment group and were evaluated for efficacy.

The clinically evaluable population (CE) included patients in the ATe population with sufficient adherence to the protocol. The ATe population consisted of 1,794 patients. Of these, 1,410 (79%) patients were clinically evaluable (CE). Patient baseline infection types were well-balanced between treatment groups and are presented in Table 9. Table 9: Baseline Infection Types in cSSSI Trials 1 and 2 – ATe Population 1 Includes all patients randomized, treated, and evaluated for efficacy VIBATIV (N=884) 1 Vancomycin (N=910) 1 Type of infection Major Abscess 375 (42.4%) 397 (43.6%) Deep/Extensive Cellulitis 309 (35.0%) 337 (37.0%) Wound Infection 139 (15.7%) 121 (13.3%) Infected Ulcer 45 (5.1%) 46 (5.1%) Infected Burn 16 (1.8%) 9 (1.0%) The primary efficacy endpoints in both trials were the clinical cure rates at a follow-up (Test-of-Cure) visit in the ATe and CE populations.

Clinical cure rates in Trials 1 and 2 are displayed for the ATe and CE population in Table 10. Table 10: Clinical Cure at Test-of-Cure in cSSSI Trials 1 and 2 – ATe and CE Populations 1 95% CI computed using a continuity correction Trial 1 Trial 2 VIBATIV Vancomycin Difference VIBATIV Vancomycin Difference % (n/N) % (n/N) (95% CI) 1 % (n/N) % (n/N) (95% CI) 1 ATe 72.5% (309/426) 71.6% (307/429) 0.9 (-5.3, 7.2) 74.7% (342/458) 74.0% (356/481) 0.7 (-5.1, 6.5) CE 84.3% (289/343) 82.8% (288/348) 1.5 (-4.3, 7.3) 83.9% (302/360) 87.7% (315/359) -3.8 (-9.2, 1.5) The cure rates by pathogen for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population are presented in Table 11. Table 11: Clinical Cure Rates at the Test-of-Cure for the Most Common Pathogens in cSSSI Trials 1 and 2 – ME Population 1 1 The ME population included patients in the CE population who had Gram-positive pathogens isolated at baseline and had central identification and susceptibility of the microbiological isolate(s). VIBATIV % (n/N) Vancomycin % (n/N) Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) 87.0% (208/239) 85.9% (225/262) Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) 82.0% (132/161) 85.1% (131/154) Enterococcus faecalis 95.6% (22/23) 80.0% (28/35) Streptococcus pyogenes 84.2% (16/19) 90.5% (19/21) Streptococcus agalactiae 73.7% (14/19) 86.7% (13/15) Streptococcus anginosus group 76.5% (13/17) 100.0% (9/9) Of the 1784 patients in the ATe population in the two cSSSI trials, 32 patients had baseline S. aureus bacteremia: 21 patients (2.4%, including 13 with MRSA) were treated with VIBATIV and 11 patients (1.2%, including 4 with MRSA) were treated with vancomycin. In these bacteremic patients, the clinical cure rate at Test-of-Cure was 57.1% (12/21) for the VIBATIV-treated patients and 54.6% (6/11) for the vancomycin-treated patients. Given the limited sample size in this subgroup, the interpretation of these results is limited.

In the two cSSSI trials, clinical cure rates were similar across gender and race. Clinical cure rates in the VIBATIV clinically evaluable (CE) population were lower in patients ≥65 years of age compared with those <65 years of age. A decrease of this magnitude was not observed in the vancomycin CE population.

Clinical cure rates in the VIBATIV CE population <65 years of age were 503/581 (87%) and in those ≥65 years were 88/122 (72%). In the vancomycin CE population clinical cure rates in patients <65 years of age were 492/570 (86%) and in those ≥65 years was 111/137 (82%). Clinical cure rates in the VIBATIV-treated patients were lower in patients with baseline CrCl ≤50 mL/min compared with those with CrCl >50 mL/min. A decrease of this magnitude was not observed in the vancomycintreated patients.

HABP/VABP Adult patients with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia were enrolled in two

randomized, parallelgroup, multinational, multicenter, double-blinded trials of identical design comparing VIBATIV (10 mg/kg IV every 24 hours) with vancomycin (1 g IV every 12 hours) for 7 to 21 days. Vancomycin dosages could be adjusted for body weight and/or renal function per local guidelines. Patients could receive concomitant aztreonam or metronidazole for suspected Gram-negative and anaerobic infection, respectively.

The addition of piperacillin/tazobactam was also permitted for coverage of Gram-negative organisms if resistance to aztreonam was known or suspected. Patients with known or suspected infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were enrolled in the studies. Of the patients enrolled across both trials, 64% were male and 70% were white.

The mean age was 63 years. At baseline, more than 50% were admitted to an intensive care unit, about 23% had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, about 29% had ventilator-associated pneumonia and about 6% had bacteremia. Demographic and baseline characteristics were generally well-balanced between treatment groups; however, there were differences between HABP/VABP Trial 1 and HABP/VABP Trial 2 with respect to a baseline history of diabetes mellitus (31% in Trial 1, 21% in Trial 2) and baseline renal insufficiency (CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min) (36% in Trial 1, 27% in Trial 2). All-cause mortality was evaluated because there is historical evidence of treatment effect for this endpoint.

This was a protocol pre-specified secondary endpoint. The 28-day all-cause mortality outcomes (overall and by baseline creatinine clearance categorization) in the group of patients who had at least one baseline Gram-positive respiratory pathogen are shown in Table 12. This group of patients included those who had mixed Gram-positive/Gram-negative infections. Table 12: All-Cause Mortality at Day 28 in Patients with at Least One Baseline Gram- Positive Pathogen a Mortality rates are based on Kaplan-Meier estimates at Study Day 28. There were 84 patients (5.6%) whose survival statuses were not known up to 28 days after initiation of study drug and were considered censored at the last day known to be alive.

Thirty-five of these patients were treated with VIBATIV and 45 were treated with vancomycin. Trial 1 Trial 2 VIBATIV Vancomycin VIBATIV Vancomycin All Patients Mortality a 28.7% N=187 24.3% N=180 24.3% N=224 22.3% N=206 Difference (95% CI) 4.4% (-4.7%, 13.5%) 2.0% (-6.1%, 10%) CrCl ≤ 50 mL/min Mortality a 41.8% N=63 35.4% N=68 43.9% N=53 29.6% N=58 Difference (95% CI) 6.4% (-10.4, 23.2) 14.3% (-3.6, 32.2) CrCl > 50 mL/min Mortality a 22.0% N=124 17.6% N=112 18.2% N=171 19.3% N=148 Difference (95% CI) 4.4% (-5.9, 14.7) -1.1% (-9.8, 7.6) The protocol-specified analysis included clinical cure rates at the TOC (7 to 14 days after the last dose of study drug) in the co-primary All-Treated (AT) and Clinically Evaluable (CE) populations ( Table 13 ). Clinical cure was determined by resolution of signs and symptoms, no further antibacterial therapy for HABP/VABP after end-oftreatment, and improvement or no progression of baseline radiographic findings. However, the quantitative estimate of treatment effect for this endpoint has not been established.

Table 13: Clinical Response Rates in Trials 1 and 2 – AT and CE Populations a All-Treated (AT) Population: Patients who received at least one dose of study medication b Clinically Evaluable (CE) Population: Patients who were clinically evaluable Trial 1 Trial 2 VIBATIV Vancomycin VIBATIV Vancomycin AT a Difference (95% CI) 57.5% (214/372) 59.1% (221/374) 60.2% (227/377) 60.0% (228/380) -1.6% (-8.6%, 5.5%) 0.2% (-6.8%, 7.2%) CE b Difference (95% CI) 83.7% (118/141) 80.2% (138/172) 81.3% (139/171) 81.2% (138/170) 3.5% (-5.1%, 12.0%) 0.1% (-8.2%, 8.4%) Among the 797 patients with at least one Gram-positive respiratory pathogen at baseline, 73 patients had concurrent S. aureus bacteremia: 35 patients (8.5%, including 21 with MRSA) were treated with VIBATIV and 38 patients (9.8%, including 24 with MRSA) were treated with vancomycin. In these bacteremic patients, the 28-day all-cause mortality rate was 40.0% (14/35) for VIBATIV-treated patients and 39.5% (15/38) for vancomycin-treated patients. Given the limited sample size in this subgroup, the interpretation of these results is limited.

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Vibativ?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Vibativ Prices