Vemlidy Drug Information
Generic name: TENOFOVIR ALAFENAMIDE
Uses of Vemlidy
is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in adults and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older and weighing at least 25 kg with compensated liver disease . VEMLIDY is a hepatitis B virus (HBV) nucleoside analog reverse transcriptase inhibitor and is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in adults and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older and weighing at least 25 kg with compensated liver disease.
Dosage & Administration of Vemlidy
Testing
Prior to Initiation of VEMLIDY Prior to initiation of VEMLIDY, patients should be tested for HIV-1 infection. VEMLIDY alone should not be used in patients with HIV-1 infection . Prior to or when initiating VEMLIDY, and during treatment with VEMLIDY on a clinically appropriate schedule, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus.
Recommended Dosage in Adults and Pediatric Patients 6 Years of Age and
Older and Weighing at Least 25 kg The recommended dosage of VEMLIDY in adults and pediatric patients 6 years of age and older and weighing at least 25 kg is one 25 mg tablet taken orally once daily with food.
Dosage in Patients with Renal Impairment No dosage adjustment of
VEMLIDY is required in patients with estimated creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 15 mL per minute, or in patients with end stage renal disease (ESRD; estimated creatinine clearance below 15 mL per minute) who are receiving chronic hemodialysis. On days of hemodialysis, administer VEMLIDY after completion of hemodialysis treatment. VEMLIDY is not recommended in patients with ESRD who are not receiving chronic hemodialysis . No data are available to make dose recommendations in pediatric patients with renal impairment.
Dosage in Patients with Hepatic Impairment No dosage adjustment of
VEMLIDY is required in patients with mild hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh A). VEMLIDY is not recommended in patients with decompensated (Child-Pugh B or C) hepatic impairment.
Side Effects of Vemlidy
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Adverse Reactions in Adult Subjects with Chronic Hepatitis B and Compensated Liver Disease The safety assessment of VEMLIDY was based on pooled data through the Week 96 data analysis from 1298 subjects in two randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trials, Trial 108 and Trial 110, in adult subjects with chronic hepatitis B and compensated liver disease. A total of 866 subjects received VEMLIDY 25 mg once daily . Further safety assessment was based on pooled data from Trials 108 and 110 from subjects who continued to receive their original blinded treatment through Week 120 and additionally from subjects who received open-label VEMLIDY from Week 96 through Week 120 (n = 361 remained on VEMLIDY; n = 180 switched from TDF to VEMLIDY at Week 96). Based on the Week 96 analysis, the most common adverse reaction (all Grades) reported in at least 10% of subjects in the VEMLIDY group was headache.
The proportion of subjects who discontinued treatment with VEMLIDY or TDF due to adverse reactions of any severity was 1.5% and 0.9%, respectively. Table 1 displays the frequency of the adverse reactions (all Grades) greater than or equal to 5% in the VEMLIDY group. Table 1 Adverse Reactions Frequencies of adverse reactions are based on all treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of relationship to study drug. (All Grades) Reported in ≥5% of Subjects with Chronic HBV Infection and Compensated Liver Disease in Trials 108 and 110 (Week 96 analysis Double-blind phase. ) VEMLIDY (N=866) TDF (N=432) Headache 12% 10% Abdominal pain Grouped term including abdominal pain upper, abdominal pain, abdominal pain lower, and abdominal tenderness. 9% 6% Cough 8% 8% Back pain 6% 6% Fatigue 6% 5% Nausea 6% 6% Arthralgia 5% 6% Diarrhea 5% 5% Dyspepsia 5% 5% Additional adverse reactions occurring in less than 5% of subjects in Trials 108 and 110 included vomiting, rash, and flatulence.
The safety profile of VEMLIDY in subjects who continued to receive blinded treatment through Week 120 was similar to that at Week 96. The safety profile of VEMLIDY in subjects who remained on VEMLIDY in the open-label phase through Week 120 was similar to that in subjects who switched from TDF to VEMLIDY at Week 96. Renal Laboratory Tests In a pooled analysis of Trials 108 and 110 in adult subjects with chronic hepatitis B and a median baseline estimated creatinine clearance between 106 and 105 mL per minute (for the VEMLIDY and TDF groups, respectively), mean serum creatinine increased by less than 0.1 mg/dL and median serum phosphorus decreased by 0.1 mg/dL in both treatment groups at Week 96. Median change from baseline to Week 96 in estimated creatinine clearance was -1.2 mL per minute in the VEMLIDY group and -4.8 mL per minute in those receiving TDF. In subjects who remained on blinded treatment beyond Week 96 in Trials 108 and 110, change from baseline in renal laboratory parameter values in each group at Week 120 were similar to those at Week 96. In the open-label phase, median change in estimated creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault method from Week 96 to Week 120 was -0.6 mL per minute in subjects who remained on VEMLIDY and +1.8 mL per minute in those who switched from TDF to VEMLIDY at Week 96. Mean serum creatinine and median serum phosphorus values at Week 120 were similar to those at Week 96 in subjects who remained on VEMLIDY and in subjects who switched from TDF to VEMLIDY. The long-term clinical significance of these renal laboratory changes on adverse reaction frequencies between VEMLIDY and TDF is not known. Bone Mineral Density Effects In a pooled analysis of Trials 108 and 110, the mean percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to Week 96 as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) was -0.7% with VEMLIDY compared to -2.6% with TDF at the lumbar spine and -0.3% compared to -2.5% at the total hip. BMD declines of 5% or greater at the lumbar spine were experienced by 11% of VEMLIDY subjects and 25% of TDF subjects at Week 96. BMD declines of 7% or greater at the femoral neck were experienced by 5% of VEMLIDY subjects and 13% of TDF subjects at Week 96. In subjects who remained on blinded treatment beyond Week 96 in Trials 108 and 110, mean percentage change in BMD in each group at Week 120 was similar to that at Week 96. In the open-label phase, mean percentage change in BMD from Week 96 to Week 120 in subjects who remained on VEMLIDY was 0.6% at the lumbar spine and 0% at the total hip, compared to 1.7% at the lumbar spine and 0.6% at the total hip in those who switched from TDF to VEMLIDY. The long-term clinical significance of these BMD changes is not known.
Laboratory Abnormalities The frequency of laboratory abnormalities (Grades 3–4) occurring in at least 2% of subjects receiving VEMLIDY in Trials 108 and 110 are presented in Table 2. Table 2 Laboratory Abnormalities (Grades 3–4) Reported in ≥2% of Subjects with Chronic HBV Infection and Compensated Liver Disease in Trials 108 and 110 (Week 96 analysis Double-blind phase. ) Laboratory Parameter Abnormality Frequencies are based on treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities. VEMLIDY (N=866) TDF (N=432) ULN=Upper Limit of Normal ALT (>5 × ULN) 8% 10% LDL-cholesterol (fasted) (>190 mg/dL) 6% 1% Glycosuria (≥3+) 5% 2% AST (>5 × ULN) 3% 5% Creatine Kinase (≥10 × ULN) 3% 3% Serum Amylase (>2.0 × ULN) 3% 3% The overall incidence of blinded treatment ALT flares (defined as confirmed serum ALT greater than 2 × baseline and greater than 10 × ULN at 2 consecutive postbaseline visits, with or without associated symptoms) was similar between VEMLIDY (0.6%) and TDF (0.9%) through Week 96. ALT flares generally were not associated with coincident elevations in bilirubin, occurred within the first 12 weeks of treatment, and resolved without recurrence. Based on the Week 120 analysis, the frequencies of lab abnormalities in subjects who remained on VEMLIDY in the open-label phase were similar to those in subjects who switched from TDF to VEMLIDY at Week 96. Amylase and Lipase Elevations and Pancreatitis At Week 96, in Trials 108 and 110, eight subjects treated with VEMLIDY with elevated amylase levels had associated symptoms, such as nausea, low back pain; abdominal tenderness, pain, and distension; and biliary pancreatitis and pancreatitis.
Of these eight, two subjects discontinued VEMLIDY due to elevated amylase and/or lipase; one subject experienced recurrence of adverse events when VEMLIDY was restarted. No subject treated with TDF had associated symptoms or discontinued treatment. From Week 96 to Week 120, one additional subject who continued open-label VEMLIDY and none of the subjects who switched from TDF to VEMLIDY had elevated amylase levels and associated symptoms.
Serum Lipids Changes from baseline in total cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, and total cholesterol to HDL ratio among subjects treated with VEMLIDY and TDF in Trials 108 and 110 are presented in Table 3. Table 3 Lipid Abnormalities: Mean Change from Baseline in Lipid Parameters in Patients with Chronic HBV Infection and Compensated Liver Disease in Trials 108 and 110 (Week 96 analysis) VEMLIDY (N=866) TDF (N=432) Baseline Week 96 Baseline Week 96 mg/dL Change The change from baseline is the mean of within-subject changes from baseline for subjects with both baseline and Week 96 values. mg/dL Change Total Cholesterol (fasted) 188 -1 193 -25 HDL-Cholesterol (fasted) 60 -5 61 -12 LDL-Cholesterol (fasted) 116 +7 120 -10 Triglycerides (fasted) 102 +13 102 -7 Total Cholesterol to HDL ratio 3 0 3 0 In the open-label phase, lipid parameters at Week 120 in subjects who remained on VEMLIDY were similar to those at Week 96. In subjects who switched from TDF to VEMLIDY, mean change from Week 96 to Week 120 in total cholesterol was 23 mg/dL, HDL-cholesterol was 5 mg/dL, LDL-cholesterol was 16 mg/dL, triglycerides was 30 mg/dL, and total cholesterol to HDL ratio was 0 mg/dL. Adverse Reactions in Virologically Suppressed Adult Subjects with Chronic Hepatitis B The safety of VEMLIDY in virologically suppressed adults is based on Week 48 data from a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial (Trial 4018) in which subjects taking TDF at baseline were randomized to switch to VEMLIDY (N=243) or to continue their TDF treatment (N=245). Adverse reactions observed with VEMLIDY in Trial 4018 were similar to those in Trials 108 and 110. Renal Laboratory Tests, Bone Mineral Density Effects, and Serum Lipids In virologically suppressed adults in Trial 4018, changes from baseline in renal function, BMD, and lipid parameters in the VEMLIDY and TDF groups at Week 48 were similar to those observed in Trials 108 and 110 at Week 96. Adverse Reactions in Adult Subjects with Chronic Hepatitis B and Renal Impairment In an open-label trial (Trial 4035) in virologically suppressed adult subjects with chronic hepatitis B switching to VEMLIDY 25 mg, the safety of VEMLIDY was assessed in 78 subjects with moderate to severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance between 15 and 59 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method; Part A, Cohort 1) and 15 subjects with ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance below 15 mL per minute) receiving chronic hemodialysis (Part A, Cohort 2). The safety of VEMLIDY, including changes from baseline in renal function, BMD, and lipid parameters, was similar to that observed in clinical trials of VEMLIDY in subjects with compensated liver disease but without renal impairment. Adverse Reactions in Pediatric Subjects with Chronic Hepatitis B The safety of VEMLIDY was evaluated in HBV-infected treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced pediatric subjects between the ages of 12 to less than 18 years and weighing at least 35 kg (Cohort 1; N=70) and 6 to less than 12 years and weighing at least 25 kg (Cohort 2, Group 1: N=18) through Week 24 in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial (Trial 1092). Subjects were then eligible to roll over to receive open-label VEMLIDY. Safety data are available through Week 96. The safety profile of VEMLIDY was similar to that in adults. Bone Mineral Density Effects Among the Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, Group 1 subjects treated with VEMLIDY and placebo, the mean percent change in BMD from baseline to Week 24 was 1.6% (N=48) and 1.9% (N=23) for lumbar spine, and 1.9% (N=50) and 2.0% (N=23) for whole body, respectively.
At Week 24, mean changes from baseline BMD Z-scores were 0.01 and -0.07 for lumbar spine, and -0.04 and -0.04 for whole body, for the VEMLIDY and placebo groups, respectively. At Week 24, BMD declines of 4% or greater at lumbar spine and whole body were experienced by 6% and 2% of VEMLIDY subjects, respectively. In the open-label phase, mean percentage change in lumbar spine and whole body BMD and BMD Z-scores from baseline to Week 96 was similar in subjects who remained on VEMLIDY compared to those who switched from placebo to VEMLIDY.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been identified during post approval use of VEMLIDY or other products containing tenofovir alafenamide. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Angioedema, urticaria Renal and Urinary Disorders Acute renal failure, acute tubular necrosis, proximal renal tubulopathy, and Fanconi syndrome
Warnings & Cautions for Vemlidy
Severe Acute
Exacerbation of Hepatitis B after Discontinuation of Treatment Discontinuation of anti-hepatitis B therapy, including VEMLIDY, may result in severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis B. Patients who discontinue VEMLIDY should be closely monitored with both clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least several months after stopping treatment. If appropriate, resumption of anti-hepatitis B therapy may be warranted.
Risk of Development of
HIV-1 Resistance in Patients Coinfected with HBV and HIV-1 Due to the risk of development of HIV-1 resistance, VEMLIDY alone is not recommended for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The safety and efficacy of VEMLIDY have not been established in patients coinfected with HBV and HIV-1. HIV antibody testing should be offered to all HBV-infected patients before initiating therapy with VEMLIDY, and, if positive, an appropriate antiretroviral combination regimen that is recommended for patients coinfected with HIV-1 should be used.
New Onset or Worsening Renal Impairment Postmarketing cases of renal impairment, including
acute renal failure, proximal renal tubulopathy (PRT), and Fanconi syndrome have been reported with TAF-containing products; while most of these cases were characterized by potential confounders that may have contributed to the reported renal events, it is also possible these factors may have predisposed patients to tenofovir-related adverse events. Patients taking tenofovir prodrugs who have impaired renal function and those taking nephrotoxic agents, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, are at increased risk of developing renal-related adverse reactions . Prior to or when initiating VEMLIDY, and during treatment with VEMLIDY on a clinically appropriate schedule, assess serum creatinine, estimated creatinine clearance, urine glucose, and urine protein in all patients. In patients with chronic kidney disease, also assess serum phosphorus.
Discontinue VEMLIDY in patients who develop clinically significant decreases in renal function or evidence of Fanconi syndrome .
Lactic Acidosis/Severe Hepatomegaly with Steatosis Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis
including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogs, including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), another prodrug of tenofovir, alone or in combination with other antiretrovirals. Treatment with VEMLIDY should be suspended in any patient who develops clinical or laboratory findings suggestive of lactic acidosis or pronounced hepatotoxicity (which may include hepatomegaly and steatosis even in the absence of marked transaminase elevations).
Drug Interactions with Vemlidy
Potential for Other Drugs to Affect
VEMLIDY VEMLIDY is a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and BCRP. Drugs that strongly affect P-gp and BCRP activity may lead to changes in tenofovir alafenamide absorption (see Table 4 ). Drugs that induce P-gp activity are expected to decrease the absorption of tenofovir alafenamide, resulting in decreased plasma concentrations of tenofovir alafenamide, which may lead to loss of therapeutic effect of VEMLIDY. Coadministration of VEMLIDY with other drugs that inhibit P-gp and BCRP may increase the absorption and plasma concentration of tenofovir alafenamide.
Drugs Affecting Renal Function
Because tenofovir is primarily excreted by the kidneys by a combination of glomerular filtration and active tubular secretion, coadministration of VEMLIDY with drugs that reduce renal function or compete for active tubular secretion may increase concentrations of tenofovir and other renally eliminated drugs and this may increase the risk of adverse reactions. Some examples of drugs that are eliminated by active tubular secretion include, but are not limited to, acyclovir, cidofovir, ganciclovir, valacyclovir, valganciclovir, aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin), and high-dose or multiple NSAIDs .
Established and Other Potentially Significant Interactions Table 4 provides a listing of
established or potentially clinically significant drug interactions. The drug interactions described are based on studies conducted with tenofovir alafenamide or are predicted drug interactions that may occur with VEMLIDY . Information regarding potential drug-drug interactions with HIV antiretrovirals is not provided (see the prescribing information for emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide for interactions with HIV antiretrovirals). The table includes potentially significant interactions but is not all inclusive. Table 4 Established and Other Potentially Significant Drug Interactions This table is not all inclusive.
Concomitant Drug Class: Drug Name Effect on Concentration ↓ = decrease. Clinical Comment Anticonvulsants: ↓ tenofovir alafenamide When coadministered with carbamazepine, the tenofovir alafenamide dose should be increased to two tablets once daily. Coadministration of VEMLIDY with oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin is not recommended.
Carbamazepine Indicates that a drug interaction study was conducted. P-gp inducer Oxcarbazepine Phenobarbital Phenytoin Antimycobacterials: ↓ tenofovir alafenamide Coadministration of VEMLIDY with rifabutin, rifampin or rifapentine is not recommended. Rifabutin Rifampin Rifapentine Herbal Products: ↓ tenofovir alafenamide Coadministration of VEMLIDY with St.
John's wort is not recommended. St. John's wort (Hypericum perforatum)
Drugs without Clinically Significant Interactions with
VEMLIDY Based on drug interaction studies conducted with VEMLIDY, no clinically significant drug interactions have been observed with: ethinyl estradiol, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, midazolam, norgestimate, sertraline, sofosbuvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir.
Pregnancy Safety for Vemlidy
Pregnancy Pregnancy Exposure Registry There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to VEMLIDY during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients by calling the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR) at 1-800-258-4263. Risk Summary Available data from the APR show no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of birth defects for tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) compared with the background rate for major birth defects of 2.7% in the U.S. reference population of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) (see Data ). The rate of miscarriage is not reported in the APR. The estimated background rate of miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies in the U.S. general population is 15% to 20%. In animal studies, no adverse developmental effects were observed when tenofovir alafenamide was administered during the period of organogenesis at exposure equal to or 51 times (rats and rabbits, respectively) the tenofovir alafenamide exposure at the recommended daily dose of VEMLIDY (see Data ). No adverse effects were observed in the offspring when TDF was administered through lactation at tenofovir exposures of approximately 12 times the exposure at the recommended daily dosage of VEMLIDY. Data Human Data Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 1330 exposures to TAF-containing regimens during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 1080 exposed in the first trimester and over 240 exposed in the second/third trimester), the prevalence of birth defects in live births was 3.9% (95% CI: 2.8% to 5.2%) and 4.8% (95% CI: 2.5% to 8.3%) following first and second/third trimester exposure, respectively, to TAF-containing regimens. Methodologic limitations of the APR include the use of MACDP as the external comparator group.
The MACDP population is not disease-specific, evaluates women and infants from a limited geographic area, and does not include outcomes for births that occurred at less than 20 weeks gestation. Animal Data Embryonic fetal development studies performed in rats and rabbits revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus. The embryo-fetal NOAELs (no observed adverse effect level) in rats and rabbits occurred at tenofovir alafenamide exposures similar to and 51 times higher than, respectively, the exposure in humans at the recommended daily dose.
Tenofovir alafenamide is rapidly converted to tenofovir; the observed tenofovir exposure in rats and rabbits were 54 (rats) and 85 (rabbits) times higher than human tenofovir exposures at the recommended daily dose. Tenofovir alafenamide was administered orally to pregnant rats (25, 100, or 250 mg/kg/day) and rabbits (10, 30, or 100 mg/kg/day) through organogenesis (on gestation days 6 through 17, and 7 through 20, respectively). No adverse embryo-fetal effects were observed in rats and rabbits at tenofovir alafenamide exposures approximately similar to (rats) and 51 (rabbits) times higher than the exposure in humans at the recommended daily dose of VEMLIDY. Tenofovir alafenamide is rapidly converted to tenofovir; the observed tenofovir exposures in rats and rabbits were 54 (rats) and 85 (rabbits) times higher than human tenofovir exposures at the recommended daily dose. Since tenofovir alafenamide is rapidly converted to tenofovir and a lower tenofovir exposure in rats and mice was observed after tenofovir alafenamide administration compared to TDF, another prodrug for tenofovir administration, a pre/postnatal development study in rats was conducted only with TDF. Doses up to 600 mg/kg/day were administered through lactation; no adverse effects were observed in the offspring on gestation day 7 at tenofovir exposures of approximately 12 times higher than the exposures in humans at the recommended daily dose of VEMLIDY.
Pediatric Use of Vemlidy
Pediatric Use The pharmacokinetics, safety, and effectiveness of VEMLIDY for the treatment of chronic HBV infection have been established in pediatric patients between the ages of 6 to less than 18 years and weighing at least 25 kg (N=59) in Trial 1092 up to 96 weeks. No clinically meaningful differences in pharmacokinetics or safety were observed in comparison to those observed in adults. Safety and effectiveness of VEMLIDY has not been established in pediatric patients with chronic HBV infection who are less than 6 years of age or weigh less than 25 kg.
Overdosage Information for Vemlidy
If overdose occurs, monitor patient for evidence of toxicity. Treatment of overdosage with VEMLIDY consists of general supportive measures including monitoring of vital signs as well as observation of the clinical status of the patient. Tenofovir is efficiently removed by hemodialysis with an extraction coefficient of approximately 54%.
Clinical Studies of Vemlidy
Description of Clinical Trials
The efficacy and safety of VEMLIDY were evaluated in the trials summarized in Table 11. Table 11 Trials Conducted with VEMLIDY in Subjects with Chronic HBV Infection Trial Population Trial Arms (N) Primary Endpoint (Week) TE = treatment-experienced, TN = treatment-naive Trial 108 Randomized, double-blind, active controlled trial. (NCT01940341) HBeAg-negative TN and TE adults with compensated liver disease VEMLIDY TDF 48 Trial 110 (NCT01940471) HBeAg-positive TN and TE adults with compensated liver disease VEMLIDY TDF 48 Trial 4018 (NCT02979613) HBeAg-negative and HBeAg-positive virologically suppressed HBV DNA <20 IU/mL at screening. adults with compensated liver disease VEMLIDY TDF 48 Trial 4035 (Part A, Cohort 1) Open-label trial. (NCT03180619) Virologically suppressed adults with moderate to severe renal impairment Estimated creatinine clearance between 15 and 59 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method. VEMLIDY 24 Trial 4035 (Part A, Cohort 2) (NCT03180619) Virologically suppressed adults with ESRD End stage renal disease (estimated creatinine clearance of below 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method). receiving chronic hemodialysis VEMLIDY 24 Trial 1092 Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (NCT02932150) Pediatric subjects between the ages of 6 to less than 18 years (at least 25 kg) with compensated liver disease VEMLIDY Placebo 24
Clinical Trials in Adults with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Compensated
Liver Disease The efficacy and safety of VEMLIDY in the treatment of adults with chronic hepatitis B virus infection with compensated liver disease are based on 48-week data from two randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trials, Trial 108 (N=425) and Trial 110 (N=873). In both trials, besides trial treatment, subjects were not allowed to receive other nucleosides, nucleotides, or interferon. In Trial 108, HBeAg-negative treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced subjects with compensated liver disease (no evidence of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, variceal bleeding, INR <1.5× ULN, total bilirubin <2.5× ULN, and albumin >3.0 mg/dL) were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive VEMLIDY 25 mg (N=285) once daily or TDF 300 mg (N=140) once daily for 48 weeks. The mean age was 46 years, 61% were male, 72% were Asian, 25% were White, 2% were Black, and 1% were other races. 24%, 38%, and 31% had HBV genotype B, C, and D, respectively. 21% were treatment experienced.
At baseline, mean plasma HBV DNA was 5.8 log 10 IU/mL, mean serum ALT was 94 U/L, and 9% of subjects had a history of cirrhosis. In Trial 110, HBeAg-positive treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced subjects with compensated liver disease were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive VEMLIDY 25 mg (N=581) once daily or TDF 300 mg (N=292) once daily for 48 weeks. The mean age was 38 years, 64% were male, 82% were Asian, 17% were White, and 1% were Black or other races. 17%, 52%, and 23% had HBV genotype B, C, and D, respectively. 26% were treatment experienced.
At baseline, mean plasma HBV DNA was 7.6 log 10 IU/mL, mean serum ALT was 120 U/L, and 7% of subjects had a history of cirrhosis. In both trials, randomization was stratified on prior treatment history (nucleoside naïve or experienced) and baseline HBV DNA (<7, ≥7 to <8, and ≥8 log 10 IU/mL in Trial 108; and <8 and ≥8 log 10 IU/mL in Trial 110). The efficacy endpoint in both trials was the proportion of subjects with plasma HBV DNA levels below 29 IU/mL at Week 48. Additional efficacy endpoints include the proportion of subjects with ALT normalization, HBsAg loss and seroconversion, and HBeAg loss and seroconversion in Trial 110. Treatment outcomes of Trials 108 and 110 at Week 48 are presented in Table 12 and Table 13. Table 12 Trials 108 and 110: HBV DNA Virologic Outcome at Week 48 Missing = failure analysis. in Subjects with Chronic HBV Infection and Compensated Liver Disease Trial 108 (HBeAg-Negative) Trial 110 (HBeAg-Positive) VEMLIDY (N=285) TDF (N=140) VEMLIDY (N=581) TDF (N=292) HBV DNA <29 IU/mL 94% 93% 64% 67% Treatment Difference Adjusted by baseline plasma HBV DNA categories and oral antiviral treatment status strata. 1.8% (95% CI = -3.6% to 7.2%) -3.6% (95% CI = -9.8% to 2.6%) HBV DNA ≥29 IU/mL 2% 3% 31% 30% Baseline HBV DNA <7 log 10 IU/mL 96% (221/230) 92% (107/116) N/A N/A ≥7 log 10 IU/mL 85% (47/55) 96% (23/24) N/A N/A Baseline HBV DNA <8 log 10 IU/mL N/A N/A 82% (254/309) 82% (123/150) ≥8 log 10 IU/mL 43% (117/272) 51% (72/142) Nucleoside Naïve Treatment-naïve subjects received <12 weeks of oral antiviral treatment with any nucleoside or nucleotide analog including TDF or VEMLIDY. 94% (212/225) 93% (102/110) 68% (302/444) 70% (156/223) Nucleoside Experienced 93% (56/60) 93% (28/30) 50% (69/137) 57% (39/69) No Virologic Data at Week 48 Includes subjects who discontinued due to lack of efficacy, adverse event or death, for reasons other than an AE, death or lack or loss of efficacy, e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc., or missing data during Week 48 window but still on study drug. 4% 4% 5% 3% In Trial 108, the proportion of subjects with cirrhosis who achieved HBV DNA <29 IU/mL at Week 48 was 92% (22/24) in the VEMLIDY group and 93% (13/14) in the TDF group. The corresponding proportions in Trial 110 were 63% (26/41) and 67% (16/24) in the VEMLIDY and TDF groups, respectively.
Table 13 Additional Efficacy Parameters at Week 48 Missing = failure analysis. Trial 108 (HBeAg-Negative) Trial 110 (HBeAg-Positive) VEMLIDY (N=285) TDF (N=140) VEMLIDY (N=581) TDF (N=292) N/A = not applicable ALT Normalized ALT (Central Lab) The population used for analysis of ALT normalization included only subjects with ALT above upper limit of normal (ULN) of the central laboratory range (>43 U/L for males aged 18 to <69 years and >35 U/L for males ≥69 years; >34 U/L for females 18 to <69 years and >32 U/L for females ≥69 years) at baseline. 83% 75% 72% 67% Normalized ALT (AASLD) The population used for analysis of ALT normalization included only subjects with ALT above ULN of the 2016 American Association of the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria (>30 U/L males and >19 U/L females) at baseline. 50% 32% 45% 36% Serology HBeAg Loss / Seroconversion The population used for serology analysis included only subjects with antigen (HBeAg) positive and anti-body (HBeAb) negative or missing at baseline. N/A N/A 14% / 10% 12% / 8% HBsAg Loss / Seroconversion 0 / 0 0 / 0 1% / 1% <1% / 0
Clinical Trials in Virologically Suppressed Adults with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Who Switched to VEMLIDY The efficacy and safety of switching from TDF to VEMLIDY in virologically suppressed adults with chronic hepatitis B virus infection is based on 48-week data from a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial, Trial 4018 (N=488). Subjects must have been taking TDF 300 mg once daily for at least 12 months, with HBV DNA less than the Lower Limit of Quantitation by local laboratory assessment for at least 12 weeks prior to screening and HBV DNA <20 IU/mL at screening. Subjects were stratified by HBeAg status (HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative) and age (≥50 or <50 years) and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either switch to VEMLIDY 25 mg once daily (N=243) or stay on TDF 300 mg once daily (N=245). The mean age was 51 years (22% were ≥60 years), 71% were male, 82% were Asian, 14% were White, and 68% were HBeAg-negative. At baseline, median duration of prior TDF treatment was 220 and 224 weeks in the VEMLIDY and TDF groups, respectively.
At baseline, mean serum ALT was 27 U/L, and 16% of subjects had a history of cirrhosis. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of subjects with plasma HBV DNA levels ≥20 IU/mL at Week 48. Additional efficacy endpoints in Trial 4018 included the proportion of subjects with HBV DNA <20 IU/mL, ALT normal and normalization, HBsAg loss and seroconversion, and HBeAg loss and seroconversion. Treatment outcomes of Trial 4018 at Week 48 are presented in Table 14 and Table 15. Table 14 Trial 4018: HBV DNA Virologic Outcome at Week 48 Week 48 window was between Day 295 and Day 378 (inclusive). in Virologically Suppressed Subjects with Chronic HBV Infection VEMLIDY (N=243) TDF (N=245) HBV DNA ≥20 IU/mL No subject discontinued treatment due to lack of efficacy. <1% <1% Treatment Difference Adjusted by baseline age groups (< 50, ≥ 50 years) and baseline HBeAg status strata. 0.0% (95% CI = -1.9% to 2.0%) HBV DNA <20 IU/mL 96% 96% Treatment Difference 0.0% (95% CI = -3.7% to 3.7%) No Virologic Data at Week 48 3% 3% Discontinued Study Drug Due to AE or Death and Last Available HBV DNA <20 IU/mL 1% 0 Discontinued Study Drug Due to Other Reasons Includes subjects who discontinued for reasons other than an AE, death, or lack of efficacy, e.g., withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. and Last Available HBV DNA <20 IU/mL 2% 3% Table 15 Additional Efficacy Parameters at Week 48 Missing = failure analysis. (Trial 4018) VEMLIDY (N=243) TDF (N=245) ALT Normal ALT (Central Lab) 89% 85% Normal ALT (AASLD) 79% 75% Normalized ALT (Central Lab) The population used for analysis of ALT normalization included only subjects with ALT above upper limit of normal (ULN) of the central laboratory range (>43 U/L for males 18 to <69 years and >35 U/L for males ≥69 years; >34 U/L for females 18 to <69 years and >32 U/L for females ≥69 years) at baseline., Proportion of subjects at Week 48: VEMLIDY, 16/32; TDF, 7/19. 50% 37% Normalized ALT (AASLD) The population used for analysis of ALT normalization included only subjects with ALT above ULN of the 2018 American Association of the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) criteria (35 U/L males and 25 U/L females) at baseline., Proportion of subjects at Week 48: VEMLIDY, 26/52; TDF, 14/53. 50% 26% Serology HBeAg Loss / Seroconversion The population used for serology analysis included only subjects with antigen (HBeAg) positive and anti-body (HBeAb) negative or missing at baseline. 8% / 3% 6% / 0 HBsAg Loss / Seroconversion 0 / 0 2% / 0
Clinical Trial in Adults with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Renal
Impairment In Trial 4035, Part A, the efficacy and safety of switching from TDF and/or other antivirals to VEMLIDY were evaluated in an open-label clinical trial of virologically suppressed chronic hepatitis B infected adults with moderate to severe renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance between 15 and 59 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method) (Cohort 1, N=78) or ESRD (estimated creatinine clearance below 15 mL per minute by Cockcroft-Gault method) on hemodialysis (Cohort 2, N=15). At baseline, 98% of subjects in Part A had baseline HBV DNA <20 IU/mL. Median age was 65 years, 74% were male, 77% were Asian, 16% were White, and 83% were HBeAg-negative. Previous treatment with oral antivirals included TDF (Cohort 1, N=57; Cohort 2, N=1), lamivudine (N=46), adefovir dipivoxil (N=46), and entecavir (N=43). At baseline, 97% and 95% of subjects had ALT ≤ULN based on central laboratory criteria and 2018 AASLD criteria, respectively; median estimated creatinine clearance by Cockcroft-Gault was 43 mL per minute (45 mL per minute in Cohort 1 and 7 mL per minute in Cohort 2); and 34% of subjects had a history of cirrhosis. Overall, 98% of subjects achieved HBV DNA <20 IU/mL at Week 24 (Cohort 1, 97%; Cohort 2, 100%). Two subjects in Cohort 1 discontinued treatment early (due to subject decision); last available HBV DNA for both of these subjects was <20 IU/mL. The overall mean (SD) change from baseline in ALT values was +1 U/L (Cohort 1, +1 U/L; Cohort 2, +3 U/L) at Week 24. No subject had HBeAg or HBsAg loss at Week 24. The mean (SD) changes in HBsAg level from baseline were -0.05 log 10 IU/mL (-0.05 log 10 IU/mL for Cohort 1 and -0.07 log 10 IU/mL for Cohort 2) at Week 24.
Clinical Trial in Pediatric Subjects 6 Years of Age and Older with
Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection In Trial 1092, the efficacy and safety of VEMLIDY in chronic HBV-infected subjects were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced subjects between the ages of 12 to less than 18 years weighing at least 35 kg (Cohort 1; N=70) and 6 to less than 12 years weighing at least 25 kg (Cohort 2, Group 1; N=18). Subjects were randomized to receive VEMLIDY (N=59) or placebo (N=29) once daily. Baseline demographics and HBV disease characteristics were comparable between the VEMLIDY treatment arm and the placebo arm: in the VEMLIDY group, 58% were male, 63% were Asian, and 27% were White; 9%, 24%, 22%, and 44% had HBV genotype A, B, C, and D, respectively; 98% percent were HBeAg positive. At baseline, overall median HBV DNA was 8.1 log 10 IU/mL, mean ALT was 107 U/L, median HBsAg was 4.5 log 10 IU/mL. Previous treatment included oral antivirals (N=20 ), including entecavir (N=10 ), lamivudine (N=10 ), and TDF (N=2 ), and/or interferons (N=13 ). The results for each treatment group and cohort for HBV DNA < 20 IU/mL at Weeks 24, 48 and 96 are presented in Table 16 below.
Table 16 Trial 1092: HBV DNA Virologic Outcome in Pediatric Subjects 6 Years of Age and Older with Chronic HBV TAF (N=59) PBO-TAF (N=29) HBV DNA <20 IU/mL at Week 24 (total) 11/59 (19%) 0/29 - Cohort 1 (12– <18 and at least 35 kg) 10/47 (21%) 0/23 - Cohort 2 Group 1 (6– <12 and at least 25 kg) 1/12 (8%) 0/6 HBV DNA <20 IU/mL at Week 48 (total) 22/59 (37%) 6/29 (21%) Week 24 on TAF - Cohort 1 (12– <18 and at least 35 kg) 19/47 (40%) 5/23 - Cohort 2 Group 1 (6– <12 and at least 25 kg) 3/12 (25%) 1/6 (17%) HBV DNA <20 IU/mL at Week 96 (total) 36/59 (61%) 14/29 (48%) Week 72 on TAF - Cohort 1 (12– <18 and at least 35 kg) 30/47 (64%) 12/23 (52%) - Cohort 2 Group 1 (6– <12 and at least 25 kg) 6/12 (50%) 2/6 (33%) At Week 96, the overall mean (SD) change from baseline in HBV DNA for VEMLIDY-treated subjects and subjects who switched from placebo to VEMLIDY, respectively, was -6.18 log 10 IU/mL and -5.92 log 10 IU/mL. The overall median change from baseline in ALT values for the VEMLIDY and placebo-VEMLIDY treatment groups, respectively, was -
U/L and -46.5 U/L at Week 96.
ALT normalization (AASLD criteria) was achieved for 54% of VEMLIDY-treated subjects and 57% of subjects who switched from placebo to VEMLIDY. At Week 96, 14/58 (24%) VEMLIDY-treated subjects and 5/29 (17%) subjects who switched from placebo to VEMLIDY experienced HBeAg loss with anti-HBe seroconversion. One of 47 (2%) subjects in the Cohort 1 VEMLIDY group achieved HBsAg loss at Week 96.
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Vemlidy?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Vemlidy Prices