Vectibix Drug Information

Generic name: PANITUMUMAB

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antagonist [EPC]

Save on Vectibix at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Vectibix

Vectibix is an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonist indicated for the treatment of: Adult patients with wild-type RAS (defined as wild-type in both KRAS and NRAS as determined by an FDA-approved test) Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)*: In combination with FOLFOX for first-line treatment. As monotherapy following disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy. KRAS G12C-mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC)* In combination with sotorasib, for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS G12C- mutated mCRC, as determined by an FDA-approved test, who have received prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy. *Limitations of Use: Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with RAS -mutant mCRC unless used in combination with sotorasib in KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with mCRC for whom RAS mutation status is unknown.

Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC) RAS Wild-Type mCRC Vectibix is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with wild-type RAS (defined as wild-type in both KRAS and NRAS as determined by an FDA-approved test) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) : As first-line therapy in combination with FOLFOX . As monotherapy following disease progression after prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-containing chemotherapy . KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC Vectibix, in combination with sotorasib, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with KRAS G12C- mutated mCRC, as determined by an FDA-approved test, who have received prior treatment with fluoropyrimidine-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-based chemotherapy . Limitations of Use : Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with RAS -mutant mCRC unless used in combination with sotorasib in KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC. Vectibix is not indicated for the treatment of patients with mCRC for whom RAS mutation status is unknown .

Dosage & Administration of Vectibix

Patient Selection

RAS Wild-Type mCRC Prior to initiation of treatment with Vectibix as monotherapy, assess RAS mutational status in colorectal tumors and confirm the absence of a RAS mutation in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13), exon 3 (codons 59 and 61), and exon 4 (codons 117 and 146) of both KRAS and NRAS. KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC Prior to initiation of treatment with Vectibix in combination with sotorasib, confirm the presence of the KRAS G12C mutation using an FDA-approved test. Information on FDA-approved tests for the detection of RAS mutations in patients with mCRC is available at: http://www.fda.gov/CompanionDiagnostics.

Recommended Dosage

RAS Wild-Type mCRC The recommended dosage of Vectibix is 6 mg/kg, administered as an intravenous infusion every 14 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity . Appropriate medical resources for the treatment of severe infusion reactions should be available during Vectibix infusions . KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC Administer the first sotorasib dose prior to the first Vectibix infusion. The recommended dosage for Vectibix in combination with sotorasib is 6 mg/kg, administered as an intravenous infusion every 14 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or until sotorasib is withheld or discontinued . Refer to the sotorasib full prescribing information for recommended sotorasib dosing information. Appropriate medical resources for the treatment of severe infusion reactions should be available during Vectibix infusions .

Dose Modifications Dose Modifications for Vectibix in Combination with Sotorasib

When Vectibix is administered in combination with sotorasib, if treatment with sotorasib is temporarily withheld or permanently discontinued, temporarily withhold or permanently discontinue Vectibix, respectively . Refer to the sotorasib full prescribing information for dose modifications for adverse reactions associated with the use of sotorasib. Dose Modifications for Specific Adverse Reactions Associated with the Use of Vectibix Infusion Reactions Reduce infusion rate by 50% in patients experiencing a mild or moderate (Grade 1 or 2) infusion reaction for the duration of that infusion. Terminate the infusion in patients experiencing severe infusion reactions.

Depending on the severity and/or persistence of the reaction, permanently discontinue Vectibix. Dermatologic Toxicity Upon first occurrence of a Grade 3 (NCI-CTC/CTCAE) dermatologic reaction, withhold 1 to 2 doses of Vectibix. If the reaction improves to < Grade 3, reinitiate Vectibix at the original dose.

Upon the second occurrence of a Grade 3 (NCI-CTC/CTCAE) dermatologic reaction, withhold 1 to 2 doses of Vectibix. If the reaction improves to < Grade 3, reinitiate Vectibix at 80% of the original dose. Upon the third occurrence of a Grade 3 (NCI-CTC/CTCAE) dermatologic reaction, withhold 1 to 2 doses of Vectibix.

If the reaction improves to < Grade 3, reinitiate Vectibix at 60% of the original dose. Upon the fourth occurrence of a Grade 3 (NCI-CTC/CTCAE) dermatologic reaction, permanently discontinue Vectibix. Permanently discontinue Vectibix following the occurrence of a Grade 4 dermatologic reaction or for a Grade 3 (NCI-CTC/CTCAE) dermatologic reaction that does not recover after withholding 1 or 2 doses.

Preparation and

Administration For intravenous infusion only. Do not administer Vectibix as an intravenous push or bolus. Preparation Visually inspect parenteral drug products for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration.

Vectibix solution is colorless and may contain a small amount of visible translucent-to-white, amorphous, proteinaceous particles. Do not use if the solution is discolored or cloudy, or if foreign matter is present. Prepare the solution for infusion, using aseptic technique, as follows: Do not shake the vial.

Use a 21-gauge or larger gauge (smaller bore) hypodermic needle to withdraw the necessary amount of Vectibix for a dose of 6 mg/kg. Do not use needle-free devices (e.g., vial adapters) to withdraw vial contents. Dilute to a total volume of 100 mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP. Doses higher than 1000 mg should be diluted to 150 mL with 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP. Do not exceed a final concentration of 10 mg/mL. Mix diluted solution by gentle inversion.

Discard any unused portion of the vial. Administration Administer using a low-protein-binding 0.2 µm or 0.22 µm in-line filter. Vectibix must be administered via infusion pump.

Flush line before and after Vectibix administration with 0.9% sodium chloride injection, USP, to avoid mixing with other drug products or intravenous solutions. Do not mix Vectibix with, or administer as an infusion with, other medicinal products. Do not add other medications to solutions containing panitumumab.

Infuse doses of 1000 mg or lower over 60 minutes through a peripheral intravenous line or indwelling intravenous catheter. If the first infusion is tolerated, administer subsequent infusions over 30 to 60 minutes. Administer doses higher than 1000 mg over 90 minutes.

Use the diluted infusion solution of Vectibix within 6 hours of preparation if stored at room temperature, or within 24 hours of dilution if stored at 2° to 8°C (36° to 46°F). DO NOT FREEZE.

Side Effects of Vectibix

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. The data described in WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS reflect exposure to Vectibix in four clinical trials in which patients received Vectibix: Study 20020408, an open-label, multinational, randomized, controlled, monotherapy clinical trial (N = 463) evaluating Vectibix with best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone in patients with EGFR-expressing mCRC; Study 20050203, a randomized, controlled trial (N = 1183) in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC that evaluated Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX chemotherapy versus FOLFOX chemotherapy alone; CodeBreaK 300, a randomized controlled trial (N = 160) evaluating Vectibix in combination with sotorasib versus the investigator's choice of standard of care (trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib) in patients with KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC; and CodeBreak 101, an open-label, non-randomized trial evaluating sotorasib as a monotherapy and in combination with other drugs in patients with KRAS G12C-mutated advanced solid tumors, including patients with KRAS G12C-mutated mCRC who received Vectibix in combination with sotorasib (N = 79). Safety data for Study 20050203 are limited to 656 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. The safety profile of Vectibix in patients with wild-type RAS mCRC is similar with that seen in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. Safety data for CodeBreaK 300 are limited to 47 patients who received Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg. Vectibix Monotherapy In Study 20020408, the most common adverse reactions (≥ 20%) with Vectibix were skin rash with variable presentations, paronychia, fatigue, nausea, and diarrhea.

The most common (> 5%) serious adverse reactions in the Vectibix arm were general physical health deterioration and intestinal obstruction. The most frequently reported adverse reactions for Vectibix leading to withdrawal were general physical health deterioration (n = 2) and intestinal obstruction (n = 2). For Study 20020408, the data described in Table 1 and in other sections below, except where noted, reflect exposure to Vectibix administered to patients with mCRC as a monotherapy at the recommended dose and schedule (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Table 1. Adverse Reactions (≥ 5% Difference) Observed in Patients Treated with Vectibix Monotherapy and Best Supportive Care Compared to Best Supportive Care Alone (Study 20020408) Study 20020408 System Organ Class Preferred Term Vectibix Plus Best Supportive Care (N = 229) Best Supportive Care (N = 234) Any Grade n (%) Grade 3-4 n (%) Any Grade n (%) Grade 3-4 n (%) Eye Disorders Growth of eyelashes 13 Gastrointestinal Disorders Nausea 52 2 (< 1) 37 1 (< 1) Diarrhea 49 4 26 Vomiting 43 6 28 2 (< 1) Stomatitis 15 2 (< 1) General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions Fatigue 60 10 34 7 Mucosal inflammation 15 1 (< 1) 2 (< 1) Infections and Infestations Paronychia 57 4 Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders Dyspnea 41 12 30 8 Cough 34 1 (< 1) 17 Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Erythema 150 13 2 (< 1) Pruritus 132 6 4 Acneiform dermatitis 131 17 2 (< 1) Rash 51 3 2 (< 1) Skin fissures 45 3 1 (< 1) Exfoliative rash 41 4 Acne 31 3 Dry skin 23 Nail disorder 22 Skin exfoliation 21 2 (< 1) Skin ulcer 13 1 (< 1) Adverse reactions in Study 20020408 that did not meet the threshold criteria for inclusion in Table 1 were conjunctivitis (4.8% vs < 1%), dry mouth (4.8% vs 0%), pyrexia (16.6% vs 13.2%), chills (3.1% vs < 1%), pustular rash (4.4% vs 0%), papular rash (1.7% vs 0%), dehydration (2.6% vs 1.7%), epistaxis (3.9% vs 0%), and pulmonary embolism (1.3% vs 0%). In Study 20020408, dermatologic toxicities occurred in 90% of patients receiving Vectibix. Skin toxicity was severe (NCI-CTC Grade 3 and higher) in 15% of patients.

Ocular toxicities occurred in 16% of patients and included, but were not limited to, conjunctivitis (5%). One patient experienced an NCI-CTC Grade 3 event of mucosal inflammation. The incidence of paronychia was 25% and was severe in 2% of patients. In Study 20020408 (N = 229), median time to the development of dermatologic, nail, or ocular toxicity was 12 days after the first dose of Vectibix; the median time to most severe skin/ocular toxicity was 15 days after the first dose of Vectibix; and the median time to resolution after the last dose of Vectibix was 98 days.

Severe toxicity necessitated dose interruption in 11% of Vectibix-treated patients . Subsequent to the development of severe dermatologic toxicities, infectious complications, including sepsis, septic death, necrotizing fasciitis, and abscesses requiring incisions and drainage were reported. Vectibix in Combination with FOLFOX Chemotherapy The most commonly reported adverse reactions (≥ 20%) in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC receiving Vectibix (6 mg/kg every 2 weeks) and FOLFOX therapy (N = 322) in Study 20050203 were diarrhea, stomatitis, mucosal inflammation, asthenia, paronychia, anorexia, hypomagnesemia, hypokalemia, rash, acneiform dermatitis, pruritus, and dry skin (Table 2). Serious adverse reactions (≥ 2% difference between treatment arms) in Vectibix-treated patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC were diarrhea and dehydration. The commonly reported adverse reactions (≥ 1%) leading to discontinuation in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC receiving Vectibix were rash, paresthesia, fatigue, diarrhea, acneiform dermatitis, and hypersensitivity.

One Grade 5 adverse reaction, hypokalemia, occurred in a patient who received Vectibix. Table 2. Adverse Reactions (≥ 5% Difference) Observed in Patients with Wild-type KRAS Tumors Treated with Vectibix and FOLFOX Chemotherapy Compared to FOLFOX Chemotherapy Alone (Study 20050203) System Organ Class Preferred Term Vectibix Plus FOLFOX (n = 322) FOLFOX Alone (n = 327) Any Grade n (%) Grade 3-4 n (%) Any Grade n (%) Grade 3-4 n (%) Eye Disorders Conjunctivitis 58 5 10 Gastrointestinal Disorders Diarrhea 201 59 169 29 Stomatitis 87 15 42 1 (< 1) General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions Mucosal inflammation 82 14 53 1 (< 1) Asthenia 79 16 62 11 Infections and Infestations Paronychia 68 11 Investigations Weight decreased 58 3 (< 1) 22 Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders Anorexia 116 14 85 6 Hypomagnesemia 96 21 26 1 (< 1) Hypokalemia 68 32 42 15 Dehydration 26 8 10 5 Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders Epistaxis 46 30 Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Rash 179 55 24 1 (< 1) Acneiform dermatitis 104 33 Pruritus 75 3 (< 1) 14 Dry skin 68 5 13 Erythema 50 7 14 Skin fissures 50 1 (< 1) 1 (< 1) Alopecia 47 30 Acne 44 10 1 (< 1) Nail disorder 32 4 4 Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome 30 4 9 2 (< 1) Adverse reactions that did not meet the threshold criteria for inclusion in Table 2 were flushing (3% vs < 1%), abdominal pain (28% vs 23%), localized infection (3.7% vs < 1%), cellulitis (2.5% vs 0%), hypocalcemia (5.6% vs 2.1%), and deep vein thrombosis (5.3% vs 3.1%). Infusion Reactions Infusional toxicity manifesting as fever, chills, dyspnea, bronchospasm or hypotension was assessed within 24 hours of an infusion during the clinical study. Vital signs and temperature were measured within 30 minutes prior to initiation and upon completion of the Vectibix infusion.

The use of premedication was not standardized in the clinical trials. Thus, the utility of premedication in preventing the first or subsequent episodes of infusional toxicity is unknown. Across clinical trials of Vectibix monotherapy, 3% (24/725) experienced infusion reactions of which < 1% (3/725) were severe (NCI-CTC Grade 3-4). In one patient, Vectibix was permanently discontinued for a serious infusion reaction . Vectibix in Combination with Sotorasib The safety of Vectibix in combination with sotorasib was evaluated in the CodeBreaK 300 study . Patients with KRAS G12C- mutated mCRC received Vectibix 6 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks in combination with sotorasib 960 mg orally once daily (N = 47), Vectibix 6 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks in combination with sotorasib 240 mg orally once daily (N = 50), or the investigator's choice of standard of care (SOC) consisting of trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib (N = 50). Among the 47 patients who received Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg, 36% were exposed to Vectibix for 6 months or longer and 4.3% were exposed for greater than 12 months.

The median age of patients who received Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg was 63 years (range: 37-79 years); 38% were age 65 years or older; 49% were female; 79% were White, and 13% were Asian. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 26% of patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg. Serious adverse reactions in ≥ 2 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg were sepsis (6%) and intestinal obstruction (4.3%). Fatal adverse reactions occurred in 2 patients (4.3%) receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg, consisting of cardiac arrest and sepsis (1 patient each). Permanent discontinuation of Vectibix due to an adverse reaction occurred in 1 patient for decreased corrected calcium.

Dosage interruptions of Vectibix due to an adverse reaction occurred in 38% of patients. Adverse reactions which required dosage interruption in ≥ 2 patients were rash, hypomagnesemia, and keratitis. Dosage reductions of Vectibix due to an adverse reaction occurred in 17% of patients.

The adverse reaction which required dose reduction in ≥ 2 patients was rash. The most common adverse reactions (≥ 20%) in patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg were rash, dry skin, diarrhea, stomatitis, fatigue and musculoskeletal pain. The most common Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities in ≥ 2 patients (4.3%) were decreased magnesium, decreased potassium, decreased corrected calcium, and increased potassium.

Table 3 and Table 4 summarize the adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities, respectively, identified in CodeBreaK 300. Table 3. Adverse Reactions (≥ 10%) in Patients with KRAS G12C-Mutated CRC who Received Vectibix in Combination with Sotorasib in CodeBreaK 300 Adverse Reaction Vectibix 6 mg/kg in combination with sotorasib 960 mg N = 47 Trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib N = 50 All Grades (%) Grade 3 or 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3 or 4 (%) Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Rash Rash includes dermatitis acneiform, dermatosis, drug eruption, eczema, erythema, hand dermatitis, rash, rash erythematous, rash maculo-papular, rash papular, rash pruritic, rash pustular, and skin toxicity. 87 26 8 2 Dry skin Dry skin includes dry skin, xerosis, and xeroderma. 28 0 2 0 Pruritis 17 0 4 0 Nail Disorder Nail disorders include nail avulsion, nail cuticle fissure, nail disorder, nail toxicity, and paronychia. 17 0 0 0 Skin fissure 13 0 0 0 Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome 13 0 10 4 Gastrointestinal Disorders Diarrhea Diarrhea includes diarrhea, gastroenteritis, and diarrhea hemorrhagic. 28 6 26 0 Stomatitis Stomatitis includes mucosal inflammation, stomatitis, mouth ulceration, angular cheilitis, and cheilitis. 26 0 14 0 Nausea 17 2.1 36 4 Constipation 15 2.1 10 0 Abdominal pain Abdominal pain includes abdominal pain, abdominal pain upper, abdominal pain lower, abdominal discomfort, and hepatic pain. 15 0 18 2 Vomiting 13 2.1 10 2 General disorders Fatigue Fatigue includes asthenia and fatigue. 21 0 34 2 Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders Musculoskeletal pain Musculoskeletal pain includes arthralgia, back pain, myalgia, musculoskeletal chest pain, bone pain, and pain in extremity. 21 2.1 14 2 Hematological Disorders Hemorrhage Hemorrhage includes epistaxis, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, vaginal hemorrhage, rectal hemorrhage, hematochezia, hemorrhage, hemorrhage urinary tract, hematospermia, and hematuria. 13 2.1 2 0 Eye Disorders Conjunctivitis Conjunctivitis includes conjunctival hyperemia, conjunctivitis, and conjunctivitis allergic. 11 0 2 0 Table 4. Select Laboratory Abnormalities (≥ 20%) that Worsened from Baseline in Patients with KRAS G12C-Mutated CRC who Received Vectibix in Combination with Sotorasib in CodeBreaK 300 The denominator used to calculate the rate varied from 44 to 46 in the Vectibix + sotorasib arm and 18 to 50 in the trifluridine/tipiracil or regorafenib arm based on the number of patients with a baseline value and at least one post-treatment value. Laboratory Abnormalities Vectibix 6 mg/kg + Sotorasib Trifluridine/tipiracil or Regorafenib All Grades (%) Grade 3 or 4 (%) All Grades (%) Grade 3 or 4 (%) Chemistry Magnesium decreased 76 24 8 0 Calcium (corrected) decreased 74 4.3 46 0 Aspartate aminotransferase increased 39 0 22 2 Alkaline phosphatase increased 33 2.2 33 0 Creatinine kinase increased 30 2.3 7 0 Alanine aminotransferase increased 28 0 16 2 Potassium decreased 26 7 12 0 Albumin decreased 26 2.2 22 0 Urine protein increased 23 0 22 6 Potassium increased 22 4.3 6 0 Glucose decreased 22 0 2 0 Hematology Hemoglobin decreased 30 0 58 6 Lymphocytes decreased 26 2.2 56 8 White blood cells decreased 24 0 48 14

Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of Vectibix. Because these reactions are reported in a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: Skin necrosis, angioedema, life-threatening and fatal bullous mucocutaneous disease Immune system disorders: Infusion reaction Eye disorders: Keratitis/ulcerative keratitis, corneal perforation

Warnings & Cautions for Vectibix

Dermatologic and Soft Tissue Toxicity Vectibix can cause dermatologic toxicity, which may

be severe. Clinical manifestations included, but were not limited to, acneiform dermatitis, pruritis, erythema, rash, skin exfoliation, paronychia, dry skin, and skin fissures. Among 229 patients who received Vectibix as monotherapy, dermatologic toxicity occurred in 90% including Grade 3 (15%). Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, dermatologic toxicity occurred in 96% including Grade 4 (1%) and Grade 3 (32%). In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, dermatologic toxicities occurred in 94%, including Grade 3 (16%) of patients.

Monitor patients who develop dermatologic or soft tissue toxicities while receiving Vectibix for the development of inflammatory or infectious sequelae. Life-threatening and fatal infectious complications including necrotizing fasciitis, abscesses, and sepsis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Life-threatening and fatal bullous mucocutaneous disease with blisters, erosions, and skin sloughing has also been observed in patients treated with Vectibix.

It could not be determined whether these mucocutaneous adverse reactions were directly related to EGFR inhibition or to idiosyncratic immune-related effects (e.g., Stevens-Johnson syndrome or toxic epidermal necrolysis). Withhold or discontinue Vectibix for dermatologic or soft tissue toxicity associated with severe or life-threatening inflammatory or infectious complications . Dose modifications for Vectibix concerning dermatologic toxicity are provided .

Increased Tumor Progression, Increased Mortality, or Lack of Benefit in Patients with

RAS- Mutant mCRC Receiving Vectibix Monotherapy or in Combination with Oxaliplatin-based Chemotherapy Vectibix monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is not indicated for the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer that harbor somatic RAS mutations in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13), exon 3 (codons 59 and 61), and exon 4 (codons 117 and 146) of either KRAS or NRAS and hereafter is referred to as " RAS " . Retrospective subset analyses across several randomized clinical trials were conducted to investigate the role of RAS mutations on the clinical effects of anti-EGFR-directed monoclonal antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab). Anti-EGFR antibodies in patients with tumors containing RAS mutations resulted in exposing those patients to anti-EGFR related adverse reactions without clinical benefit from these agents . Additionally, in Study 20050203, 272 patients with RAS- mutant mCRC tumors received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX and 276 patients received FOLFOX alone. In an exploratory subgroup analysis, overall survival (OS) was shorter (HR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.45) in patients with RAS- mutant mCRC who received Vectibix and FOLFOX versus FOLFOX alone .

Electrolyte Depletion/Monitoring Vectibix can cause progressively decreasing serum magnesium levels leading to

severe (Grade 3 or 4) hypomagnesemia. Among 229 patients who received Vectibix as monotherapy, decreased magnesium occurred in 38% including Grade 4 (1.3%) and Grade 3 (2.6%). Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, decreased magnesium occurred in 51% including Grade 4 (5%) and Grade 3 (6%). In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, decreased magnesium occurred in 69%, including Grade 4 (2.4%) and Grade 3 (14%). Monitor patients for hypomagnesemia and hypocalcemia prior to initiating Vectibix treatment, periodically during Vectibix treatment, and for up to 8 weeks after the completion of treatment. Other electrolyte disturbances, including hypokalemia, have also been observed.

Replete magnesium and other electrolytes as appropriate.

Infusion Reactions

In Study 20020408, 4% of patients experienced infusion reactions and 1% of patients experienced severe infusion reactions (NCI-CTC Grade 3-4). Infusion reactions, manifesting as fever, chills, dyspnea, bronchospasm, and hypotension, can occur following Vectibix administration . Fatal infusion reactions occurred in postmarketing experience. Terminate the infusion for severe infusion reactions .

Acute Renal Failure Severe diarrhea and dehydration, leading to acute renal failure

and other complications, have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Among 229 patients who received Vectibix as monotherapy, acute renal failure occurred in 2% including Grade 3 or 4 (2%). Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, acute renal failure occurred in 2% including Grade 3 or 4 (2%). In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, acute renal failure occurred in 3.2% including Grade 3 (0.8%). Monitor patients for diarrhea and dehydration, provide supportive care (including anti-emetic or anti-diarrheal therapy) as needed, and withhold Vectibix if necessary.

Pulmonary Fibrosis/Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Fatal and nonfatal cases of interstitial lung

disease (ILD) (1%) and pulmonary fibrosis have been observed in patients treated with Vectibix. Pulmonary fibrosis occurred in less than 1% (2/1467) of patients enrolled in clinical studies of Vectibix. Grade 1 ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 0.8% (1/126) of patients enrolled in clinical studies of Vectibix in combination with sotorasib.

In the event of acute onset or worsening of pulmonary symptoms, interrupt Vectibix therapy. Discontinue Vectibix therapy if ILD is confirmed. In patients with a history of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, or evidence of interstitial pneumonitis or pulmonary fibrosis, the benefits of therapy with Vectibix versus the risk of pulmonary complications must be carefully considered.

Photosensitivity Exposure to sunlight can exacerbate dermatologic toxicity. Advise patients to wear

sunscreen and hats and limit sun exposure while receiving Vectibix.

Ocular Toxicities Serious cases of keratitis, ulcerative keratitis, and corneal perforation have

occurred with Vectibix use. Among 585 patients who received Vectibix in combination with FOLFOX, keratitis occurred in 0.3%. In 126 patients receiving Vectibix in combination with sotorasib across clinical studies, keratitis occurred in 1.6%, ulcerative keratitis occurred in 0.8%, and vernal keratoconjunctivitis in 0.8% (all were Grade 1-2). Monitor for evidence of keratitis, ulcerative keratitis, or corneal perforation. Interrupt or discontinue Vectibix therapy for acute or worsening keratitis, ulcerative keratitis, or corneal perforation.

Increased Mortality and Toxicity with Vectibix in Combination with Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy

In an interim analysis of an open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in the first-line setting in patients with mCRC, the addition of Vectibix to the combination of bevacizumab and chemotherapy resulted in decreased OS and increased incidence of NCI-CTC Grade 3-5 (87% vs 72%) adverse reactions. NCI-CTC Grade 3-4 adverse reactions occurring at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients included rash/acneiform dermatitis (26% vs 1%), diarrhea (23% vs 12%), dehydration (16% vs 5%), primarily occurring in patients with diarrhea, hypokalemia (10% vs 4%), stomatitis/mucositis (4% vs < 1%), and hypomagnesemia (4% vs 0%). NCI-CTC Grade 3-5 pulmonary embolism occurred at a higher rate in Vectibix-treated patients (7% vs 3%) and included fatal events in three (< 1%) Vectibix-treated patients. As a result of the toxicities experienced, patients randomized to Vectibix, bevacizumab, and chemotherapy received a lower mean relative dose intensity of each chemotherapeutic agent (oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bolus 5-FU, and/or infusional 5-FU) over the first 24 weeks on study compared with those randomized to bevacizumab and chemotherapy. 5.10 Embryo-fetal Toxicity Based on data from animal studies and its mechanism of action, Vectibix can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman.

When given during organogenesis, panitumumab administration resulted in embryolethality in cynomolgus monkeys at exposures approximately 1.25 to 5 times the recommended human dose. Advise pregnant women and females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to the fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment, and for at least 2 months after the last dose of Vectibix.

Pregnancy Safety for Vectibix

Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on data from animal studies and its mechanism of action, Vectibix can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women . Limited available data on the use of Vectibix in pregnant women are not sufficient to inform a risk of adverse pregnancy-related outcomes. Vectibix is a human IgG monoclonal antibody and may be transferred across the placenta during pregnancy. Reproduction studies in cynomolgus monkeys treated with 1.25 to 5 times the recommended human dose of panitumumab resulted in significant embryolethality and abortions; however, no other evidence of teratogenesis was noted in offspring . Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to the fetus.

In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. Data Animal Data Based on animal models, EGFR is involved in prenatal development and may be essential for normal organogenesis, proliferation, and differentiation in the developing embryo. Pregnant cynomolgus monkeys were treated weekly with panitumumab during the period of organogenesis (gestation day 20-50). While no panitumumab was detected in serum of neonates from panitumumab-treated dams, anti-panitumumab antibody titers were present in 14 of 27 offspring delivered at GD 100. There were no fetal malformations or other evidence of teratogenesis noted in the offspring; however, significant increases in embryolethality and abortions occurred at doses of approximately 1.25 to 5 times the recommended human dose (based on body weight).

Pediatric Use of Vectibix

Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of Vectibix have not been established in pediatric patients. The pharmacokinetics of panitumumab at doses ranging from 2.5 mg/kg intravenous weekly, 6 mg/kg intravenous every 2 weeks, or 9 mg/kg intravenous every 3 weeks were evaluated in 28 pediatric patients. Panitumumab exposures were comparable in adult and adolescent patients of 12 to 17 years of age.

Limited data suggested that pediatric patients of 2 to < 12 years of age had lower panitumumab exposure and higher clearance than that in adolescent patients following 6 mg/kg intravenous administration of Vectibix. There was no evidence of an anti-tumor treatment effect in these patients.

Overdosage Information for Vectibix

Doses up to approximately twice the recommended therapeutic dose (12 mg/kg) resulted in adverse reactions of skin toxicity, diarrhea, dehydration, and fatigue.

Clinical Studies of Vectibix

Recurrent or Refractory mCRC

The safety and efficacy of Vectibix was demonstrated in Study 20020408, an open-label, multinational, randomized, controlled trial of 463 patients with EGFR-expressing, metastatic carcinoma of the colon or rectum, in Study 20080763, an open-label, multicenter, multinational, randomized trial of 1010 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC, and in Study 20100007, an open-label, multicenter, multinational, randomized trial of 377 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. Study 20020408 (NCT00113763) Patients in Study 20020408 were required to have progressed on or following treatment with a regimen(s) containing a fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan; progression was confirmed by an independent review committee (IRC) masked to treatment assignment for 76% of the patients. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive panitumumab at a dose of 6 mg/kg given once every 2 weeks plus BSC (N = 231) or BSC alone (N = 232) until investigator-determined disease progression. Randomization was stratified based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) (0 and 1 vs 2) and geographic region (Western Europe, Eastern/Central Europe, or other). Upon investigator-determined disease progression, patients in the BSC-alone arm were eligible to receive panitumumab and were followed until disease progression was confirmed by the IRC. Based upon IRC determination of disease progression, a statistically significant prolongation in progression free survival (PFS) was observed in patients receiving panitumumab compared to those receiving BSC alone.

The mean PFS was 96 days in the panitumumab arm and 60 days in the BSC-alone arm. The study results were analyzed in the wild-type KRAS subgroup where KRAS status was retrospectively determined using archived paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. KRAS mutation status was determined in 427 patients (92%); of these, 243 (57%) had no detectable KRAS mutations in either codons 12 or 13. The hazard ratio for PFS in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC was 0.45 (95% CI: 0.34-0.59) favoring the panitumumab arm.

The response rate was 17% for the panitumumab arm and 0% for BSC. There were no differences in OS; 77% of patients in the BSC arm received panitumumab at the time of disease progression. Study 20080763 (NCT01001377) Study 20080763 was an open-label, multicenter, multinational, randomized (1:1) clinical trial, stratified by region (North America, Western Europe, and Australia versus rest of the world) and ECOG PS (0 and 1 vs 2) in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. A total of 1010 patients who received prior treatment with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and a thymidylate synthase inhibitor were randomized to receive Vectibix 6 mg/kg intravenously over 60 minutes every 14 days or cetuximab 400 mg/m 2 intravenously over 120 minutes on day 1 followed by 250 mg/m 2 intravenously over 60 minutes every 7 days. The trial excluded patients with clinically significant cardiac disease and interstitial lung disease.

The major efficacy analysis tested whether the OS of Vectibix was noninferior to cetuximab. Data for investigator-assessed PFS and objective response rate (ORR) were also collected. The criteria for noninferiority was for Vectibix to retain at least 50% of the OS benefit of cetuximab based on an OS hazard ratio of 0.55 from the NCIC CTG CO.17 study relative to BSC. In Study 20080763, 37% of patients were women, 52% were white, 45% were Asian, and 1.3% were Hispanic or Latino.

Thirty-one percent of patients were enrolled at sites in North America, Western Europe, or Australia. ECOG performance was 0 in 32% of patients, 1 in 60% of patients, and 2 in 8% of patients. Median age was 61 years.

More patients (62%) had colon cancer than rectal cancer (38%). Most patients (74%) had not received prior bevacizumab. The key efficacy analysis for Study 20080763 demonstrated that Vectibix was statistically significantly noninferior to cetuximab for OS. The efficacy results for Study 20080763 are presented in Table 5 and Figure 1. Table 5. Results in Previously Treated Wild-type KRAS mCRC (Study 20080763) Wild-type KRAS Population Vectibix (n = 499) Modified intent-to-treat population that included all patients who received at least one dose of therapy Cetuximab (n = 500) Overall Survival (OS) Number of OS events (%) 383 392 Median (months) (95% CI) 10.4

Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.97 Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Median (months) (95% CI)

4.1

Hazard ratio (95% CI) 1.00 Objective Response Rate (ORR) % (95% CI)

22% (18%, 26%) 19% (16%, 23%) Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Overall Survival in Patients with Wild-type KRAS mCRC (Study 20080763) Figure 1 Study 20100007 (NCT01412957) Study 20100007 was an open-label, multicenter, randomized (1:1) clinical study stratified by ECOG performance status (0 or 1 vs 2) and region (sites in Europe versus Asia versus rest of world) in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. Eligible patients were required to have received prior therapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and a thymidylate synthase inhibitor, and have wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC as determined by a clinical trial assay. An assessment for RAS status (defined as KRAS exons 2, 3, and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4) using Sanger sequencing was conducted in patients for whom tumor tissue was available. Patients were randomized to receive Vectibix (6 mg/kg intravenously every 14 days) plus BSC or BSC alone.

Patients received Vectibix and BSC or BSC until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, unacceptable toxicity, or death. Patients randomized to BSC were not offered Vectibix at the time of disease progression. The major efficacy outcome measure was OS in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC. Secondary efficacy outcome measures included OS in the subgroup of patients with wild-type RAS mCRC; PFS and ORR in patients with wild-type KRAS ; and PFS and ORR in the subgroup of patients with wild-type RAS mCRC. A total of 377 patients were randomized, 189 to the Vectibix plus BSC arm and 188 to the BSC alone arm.

Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were: median age of 61 years (range: 19-82); 57% male; 55% White, 43% Asian; 36% ECOG PS-0, 55% ECOG PS-1; 57% had a primary colon tumor and 43% had a primary rectal tumor; and 32% had prior bevacizumab exposure. KRAS tumor mutation status was available for all patients and RAS tumor mutation status was available for 86% of the 377 patients. Among the 377 patients, 270 (72%) patients had wild-type RAS tumors, 54 (14%) had mutant RAS tumors, and 54 (14%) had unknown RAS tumor status.

The results of the study demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS. The efficacy results for Study 20100007 are presented in Table 6 and Figure 2. Table 6. Results in Previously Treated Wild-type KRAS and Wild-type RAS mCRC (Study 20100007) Wild-type KRAS Population (n = 377) Wild-type RAS Population (n = 270) Vectibix Plus BSC (n = 189) BSC (n = 188) Vectibix Plus BSC (n = 142) BSC (n = 128) OS Number of deaths (%) 136 135 104 95 Median (months) (95% CI) 10 7.4 10

HR (95% CI) 0.73 0.7 p-value 0.0096 0.0135

PFS Number of events (%) 182 162 137 113 Median (months) (95% CI) 3.6 1.7 5.2

HR (95% CI) 0.51 0.46 p-value < 0.0001 < 0.0001

ORR % (95% CI) 27 1.6 31

Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Overall Survival in Patients with Wild-type

RAS mCRC (Study 20100007) Figure 2

First-line mCRC in Combination with

FOLFOX Chemotherapy Study 20050203 (NCT00364013) Study 20050203 was a multicenter, open-label trial that randomized (1:1) patients with mCRC who were previously untreated in the metastatic setting and who had received no prior oxaliplatin to receive Vectibix every 14 days in combination with FOLFOX or to FOLFOX alone every 14 days. Vectibix was administered at 6 mg/kg over 60 minutes prior to administration of chemotherapy. The FOLFOX regimen consisted of oxaliplatin 85 mg per m 2 IV infusion over 120 minutes and leucovorin (dl-racemic) 200 mg per m 2 intravenous infusion over 120 minutes at the same time on day 1 using a Y-line, followed on day 1 by 5-FU 400 mg per m 2 intravenous bolus.

The 5-FU bolus was followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg per m 2 over 22 hours. On day 2, patients received leucovorin 200 mg per m 2 followed by the bolus dose (400 mg per m 2 ) and continuous infusion of 5-FU (600 mg per m 2 ) over 22 hours. Study 20050203 excluded patients with known central nervous system metastases, clinically significant cardiac disease, interstitial lung disease, or active inflammatory bowel disease.

The prespecified major efficacy measure was PFS in the subgroup of patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC as assessed by a blinded independent central review of imaging. Other key efficacy measures included OS and ORR. In Study 20050203, in the wild-type KRAS subgroup (n = 656), 64% of patients were men, 92% White, 2% Black, and 4% Hispanic or Latino. Sixty-six percent of patients had colon cancer and 34% had rectal cancer.

ECOG performance was 0 in 56% of patients, 1 in 38% of patients, and 2 in 6% of patients. Median age was 61.5 years. The efficacy results in Study 20050203 in patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC are presented in Table 7 below.

Table 7. Results in Patients with Wild-type KRAS mCRC (Study 20050203) Wild-type KRAS population Primary Analysis Vectibix plus FOLFOX (n = 325) FOLFOX Alone (n = 331) PFS Median (months) (95% CI) 9.6 8 Hazard ratio (95% CI) p-value 0.8 p = 0.02 ORR % (95% CI) 54% (48%, 59%) 47% (41%, 52%) Exploratory Analysis of OS An exploratory analysis of OS with updated information based on events in 82% of patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC estimated the treatment effect of Vectibix plus FOLFOX compared with FOLFOX alone on OS (Figure 3). Median OS among 325 patients with wild-type KRAS mCRC who received Vectibix plus FOLFOX was 23.8 months (95% CI: 20.0, 27.7) vs 19.4 months (95% CI: 17.4, 22.6) among 331 patients who received FOLFOX alone (HR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.70, 0.98). Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Overall Survival in Patients with Wild-type KRAS mCRC (Study 20050203) Figure 3 Retrospective exploratory analyses in the RAS wild-type subgroup Among the 656 patients with wild-type KRAS exon 2 mCRC, RAS mutation status was assessed for 620 patients using Sanger bidirectional sequencing and Surveyor ® /WAVE ® analysis. Of these 620 patients, approximately 17% of patients (n = 104) tumors harbored mutations in KRAS exons 3 or 4 or in NRAS exons 2, 3, and 4. Retrospective subset analyses were then conducted among the subset of patients without RAS mutations (n = 512) as described above. In the wild-type RAS subgroup, 65% of patients were men and 91% were White, 2% Black, and 5% Hispanic or Latino.

Sixty-five percent of patients had colon cancer and 35% had rectal cancer. ECOG performance was 0 in 57% of patients, 1 in 37% of patients, and 2 in 6% of patients. Median age was 61 years.

Table 8. Results in Patients with Wild-Type RAS mCRC (Study 20050203) Wild-type RAS population Primary Analysis Vectibix plus FOLFOX (n = 259) FOLFOX Alone (n = 253) PFS Median (months) (95% CI) 10.1

Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.72 OS OS with updated information based on

events in 82% of patients Median (months) (95% CI) 25.8 (21.7; 29.7) 20.2 (17.5; 23.6) Hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.77 (0.64; 0.94) ORR % (95% CI) 58% (51%, 64%) 45% (39%, 51%) Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Overall Survival in Patients with Wild-Type RAS-mCRC (Study 20050203) Figure 4

RAS -Mutant mCRC Vectibix is not effective for the treatment of patients

with RAS- mutant mCRC, defined as a RAS mutation in exon 2 (codons 12 and 13), exon 3 (codons 59 and 61), or exon 4 (codons 117 and 146) of KRAS and NRAS, except for when Vectibix is used in combination with sotorasib in KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC. In Study 20050203, among patients with RAS -mutant tumors, the median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3, 7.9) among 272 patients receiving Vectibix plus FOLFOX and 8.7 months (95% CI: 7.6, 9.4) among patients who received FOLFOX alone (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.60). The median OS was 15.6 months (95% CI: 13.4, 17.9) among patients receiving Vectibix plus FOLFOX and 19.2 months (95% CI: 16.7, 21.8) among patients who received FOLFOX alone (HR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.55). In Study 20100007, among patients with RAS -mutant tumors, no differences in OS or PFS were observed between the treatment arms.

KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC

The efficacy of Vectibix in combination with sotorasib was evaluated in CodeBreaK 300, a multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study conducted in previously treated patients with KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC. Key eligibility criteria included patients 18 years of age or older, who had received at least one prior line of therapy for mCRC, and who had received prior fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan for metastatic disease unless there was a medical contraindication. All patients were also required to have KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC prospectively identified in tumor tissue samples using the QIAGEN therascreen ® KRAS RGQ PCR performed in a central laboratory. Other eligibility criteria included an ECOG PS of ≤ 2, and at least one measurable lesion as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). A total of 160 patients with previously treated mCRC with the KRAS G12C mutation were randomized 1:1:1 to receive Vectibix 6 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and sotorasib 960 mg orally daily (N = 53), or Vectibix 6 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks and sotorasib 240 mg orally daily (N = 53), or investigator's choice of SOC consisting of trifluridine/tipiracil, or regorafenib (N = 54). Randomization was stratified by prior anti-angiogenic therapy (yes or no), time from initial diagnosis of metastatic disease to randomization (≥ 18 months; < 18 months), and ECOG status (0 or 1 versus 2). Patients received treatment until disease progression, lack of clinical benefit or intolerance to treatment.

Sotorasib discontinuation required Vectibix discontinuation . The major efficacy outcome measure was PFS as evaluated by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) according to RECIST 1.1. Additional efficacy outcome measures included OS, Overall Response Rate (ORR), and duration of response (DOR). The efficacy results presented below are limited to Vectibix in combination with the recommended sotorasib dosage of 960 mg daily. Of the 107 patients randomized to either Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg once daily or the control arm, the median age was 64 years (range: 34-81 years); 46% were age 65 years or older; 50% were female; 74% were White; 17% were Asia; and 97% of the patients had ECOG PS 0 or 1. The primary site of disease was colon (69%) or rectum (31%). The median number of prior lines of therapy for metastatic disease was 2. Of these patients, 100% received prior fluoropyrimidine, 99% received prior oxaliplatin, 93% received prior irinotecan and 18% of patients had received prior trifluridine/tipiracil, or regorafenib. The trial demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS for patients randomized to Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 960 mg compared to the investigator's choice SOC. The final analysis of OS was not statistically significant.

The final analysis of PFS for patients randomized to Vectibix in combination with sotorasib 240 mg compared to investigator's choice of SOC was not statistically significant. The efficacy results from CodeBreaK 300 are summarized in Table 9 and Figure 5. Table 9. Efficacy Results for Patients with KRAS G12C-mutated CRC in CodeBreaK 300 Efficacy Parameters Vectibix 6 mg/kg + Sotorasib 960 mg QD (N = 53) SOC (trifluridine and tipiracil, or regorafenib) (N = 54) N = number of randomized subjects, NR = not reached, QD = once daily, SOC = standard of care, CR = complete response, PR = partial response, BICR = Blinded Independent Central Review Committee, CI = confidence interval. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) per BICR Number of events (%) 32 35 Median in months (95% CI) 5.6 2 Hazard ratio (95% CI) Hazard ratios and 95% CIs were estimated using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. 0.48 p-value (2-sided) p-value was calculated using a stratified log-rank test. 0.005 Overall Survival (OS) OS analysis was based on 6 months additional follow-up data from the time of PFS primary analysis.

Deaths (%) 24 30 Median in months (95% CI) NR (8.6, NR) 10.3 (7, NR) Hazard ratio (95% CI)

Overall Response Rate (ORR) per

BICR ORR (%) (95% CI) 95% CIs were estimated using the Clopper-Pearson method. 26 0 CR, n (%) 1 0 PR, n (%) 13 0 Duration of Response (DOR) Median in months (range) For DOR + indicates censored subjects. 4.4 (1.9+, 6+) - Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier Curve for Progression-Free Survival in CodeBreaK 300 Figure 5

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Vectibix?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Vectibix Prices