Tenofovir Disoproxil Drug Information
Generic name: TENOFOVIR DISOPROXIL FUMARATE
Uses of Tenofovir Disoproxil
HIV-1 Infection
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets are indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older. The following points should be considered when initiating therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets for the treatment of HIV-1 infection: • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should not be used in combination with ATRIPLA ®, BIKTARVY ®, COMPLERA ®, DESCOVY ®, GENVOYA ®, ODEFSEY ®, STRIBILD ®, TRUVADA ®, or VEMLIDY ®.
Chronic Hepatitis B
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets are indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in adults and pediatric patients 12 years of age and older. The following points should be considered when initiating therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection: • The indication in adults is based on safety and efficacy data from treatment of subjects who were nucleoside-treatment-naïve and subjects who were treatment-experienced with documented resistance to lamivudine. Subjects were adults with HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B with compensated liver disease. • Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets were evaluated in a limited number of subjects with chronic hepatitis B and decompensated liver disease. • The numbers of subjects in clinical trials who had adefovir resistance-associated substitutions at baseline were too small to reach conclusions of efficacy.
Dosage & Administration of Tenofovir Disoproxil
Recommended Dose in Pediatric Patients 2 Years to Less than 12 Years of Age HIV-1 Infection For the treatment of HIV-1 in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older, the recommended oral dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablet is 8 mg of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF) per kilogram of body weight (up to a maximum of 300 mg) once daily administered as tablets. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is available as tablets in 300 mg strength for pediatric patients who weigh greater than or equal to 17 kg and who are able to reliably swallow intact tablets. The dose is one tablet once daily taken orally, without regard to food.
Table 2 contain dosing recommendations for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets based on body weight. Weight should be monitored periodically and the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets dose adjusted accordingly. Table 2 Dosing Recommendations for Pediatric Patients 2 Years of Age and Older and Weighing At Least 17 kg Using Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Tablets Chronic Hepatitis B Safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in patients younger than 12 years of age have not been established.
Dose Adjustment for Renal Impairment in Adults
Significantly increased drug exposures occurred when tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets were administered to subjects with moderate to severe renal impairment. Therefore, the dosing interval of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets 300 mg should be adjusted in patients with baseline creatinine clearance below 50 mL/min using the recommendations in Table 3. These dosing interval recommendations are based on modeling of single-dose pharmacokinetic data in non-HIV and non-HBV infected subjects with varying degrees of renal impairment, including end-stage renal disease requiring hemodialysis.
The safety and effectiveness of these dosing interval adjustment recommendations have not been clinically evaluated in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment; therefore, clinical response to treatment and renal function should be closely monitored in these patients. No dose adjustment of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets 300 mg is necessary for patients with mild renal impairment (creatinine clearance 50 to 80 mL/min). Routine monitoring of estimated creatinine clearance, serum phosphorus, urine glucose, and urine protein should be performed in patients with mild renal impairment.
Table 3 Dosage Adjustment for Patients with Altered Creatinine Clearance a. Calculated using ideal (lean) body weight. b. Generally once weekly assuming three hemodialysis sessions a week of approximately 4 hours duration.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should be administered following completion of dialysis. The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir have not been evaluated in non-hemodialysis patients with creatinine clearance below 10 mL/min; therefore, no dosing recommendation is available for these patients. No data are available to make dose recommendations in pediatric patients with renal impairment.
| Body Weight Kilogram (kg) | Tablets Once Daily |
|---|---|
| 17 to less than 22 | 150 mg |
| 22 to less than 28 | 200 mg |
| 28 to less than 35 | 250 mg |
| 35 or greater | 300 mg |
| Cre atinine Clearan ce (mL/min) a | Hemodial ysis Patients | |||
| 50 or greater | 30- 49 | 10- 29 | ||
| Recomm en ded 300 mg Dosing Inte r v al | Every 24 hours | Every 48 hours | Every 72 to 96 hours | Every 7 days or after a tot al of approximate ly 12 hours of dialysis |
Side Effects of Tenofovir Disoproxil
Adverse Reactions from Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Clinical Trials in Adult Patients with HIV-1 Infection More than 12,000 subjects have been treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets alone or in combination with other antiretroviral medicinal products for periods of 28 days to 215 weeks in clinical trials and expanded access programs. A total of 1,544 subjects have received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets 300 mg once daily in clinical trials; over 11,000 subjects have received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in expanded access programs.
The most common adverse reactions (incidence greater than or equal to 10%, Grades 2 to 4) identified from any of the 3 large controlled clinical trials include rash, diarrhea, headache, pain, depression, asthenia, and nausea. Treatment-Naïve Patients Study 903 - Treatment-Emergent Adverse-Reactions: The most common adverse reactions seen in a double-blind comparative controlled trial in which 600 treatment-naïve subjects received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets (N=299) or stavudine (N=301) in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz for 144 weeks (Study 903) were mild to moderate gastrointestinal events and dizziness. Mild adverse reactions (Grade 1) were common with a similar incidence in both arms and included dizziness, diarrhea, and nausea.
Selected treatment-emergent moderate to severe adverse reactions are summarized in Table 4. Frequencies of adverse reactions are based on all treatment-emergent adverse events, regardless of relationship to study drug. b. Lipodystrophy represents a variety of investigator-described adverse events not a protocol-defined syndrome. c.
Peripheral neuropathy includes peripheral neuritis and neuropathy. d. Rash event includes rash, pruritus, maculopapular rash, urticaria, vesiculobullous rash, and pustular rash. Laboratory Abnormalities: With the exception of fasting cholesterol and fasting triglyceride elevations that were more common in the stavudine group (40% and 9%) compared with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets (19% and 1%), respectively, laboratory abnormalities observed in this trial occurred with similar frequency in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and stavudine treatment arms.
A summary of Grades 3 to 4 laboratory abnormalities is provided in Table 5. Adverse reactions observed in this trial were generally consistent with those seen in previous studies in treatment-experienced or treatment-naïve subjects (Table 6). Changes in Bone Mineral Density In HIV-1 infected adult subjects in Study 903, there was a significantly greater mean percentage decrease from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine in subjects receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets + lamivudine + efavirenz (-2.2% ± 3.9) compared with subjects receiving stavudine + lamivudine + efavirenz (-1% ± 4.6) through 144 weeks.
In both groups, the majority of the reduction in BMD occurred in the first 24 to 48 weeks of the trial and this reduction was sustained through Week 144. Twenty-eight percent of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets-treated subjects vs. 21% of the stavudine-treated subjects lost at least 5% of BMD at the spine or 7% of BMD at the hip. Clinically relevant fractures (excluding fingers and toes) were reported in 4 subjects in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group and 6 subjects in the stavudine group.
In addition, there were significant increases in biochemical markers of bone metabolism (serum bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, serum osteocalcin, serum C telopeptide, and urinary N telopeptide) and higher serum parathyroid hormone levels and 1,25 Vitamin D levels in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group relative to the stavudine group; however, except for bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, these changes resulted in values that remained within the normal range. From Weeks 96 to 144 of the trial, subjects received TRUVADA with efavirenz in place of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets + EMTRIVA with efavirenz. c. Rash event includes rash, exfoliative rash, rash generalized, rash macular, rash maculopapular, rash pruritic, and rash vesicular.
Laboratory Abnormalities: Laboratory abnormalities observed in this trial were generally consistent with those seen in previous trials (Table 7). Treatment-Experienced Patients Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions: The adverse reactions seen in treatment-experienced subjects were generally consistent with those seen in treatment-naïve subjects including mild to moderate gastrointestinal events, such as nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, and flatulence. Less than 1% of subjects discontinued participation in the clinical trials due to gastrointestinal adverse reactions (Study 907).
A summary of moderate to severe treatment-emergent adverse reactions that occurred during the first 48 weeks of Study 907 is provided in Table 8. Peripheral neuropathy includes peripheral neuritis and neuropathy. c. Laboratory Abnormalities: Laboratory abnormalities observed in this trial occurred with similar frequency in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and placebo-treated groups.
The adverse reactions observed in subjects who received treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets were consistent with those observed in clinical trials in adults. Of these, 4 subjects discontinued from the trial due to adverse reactions consistent with proximal renal tubulopathy. Three of these 4 subjects presented with hypophosphatemia and also had decreases in total body or spine BMD Z score.
Changes in Bone Mineral Density: Clinical trials in HIV-1 infected children and adolescents evaluated BMD changes. Six tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets-treated subjects and one placebo-treated subject had significant (greater than 4%) lumbar spine BMD loss at Week 48. In Study 352 (2 to less than 12 years), the mean rate of BMD gain in lumbar spine at Week 48 was similar between the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and the d4T or AZT treatment groups.
Total body BMD gain was less in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets compared to the d4T or AZT treatment groups. One tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated subject and none of the d4T or AZT-treated subjects experienced significant (greater than 4%) lumbar spine BMD loss at Week 48. In both trials, skeletal growth (height) appeared to be unaffected.
Clinical Trials in Adult Subjects with Chronic Hepatitis B and Compensated Liver Disease Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions: In controlled clinical trials in 641 subjects with chronic hepatitis B (0102 and 0103), more subjects treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets during the 48-week double-blind period experienced nausea: 9% with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets versus 2% with HEPSERA. Other treatment-emergent adverse reactions reported in more than 5% of subjects treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets included: abdominal pain, diarrhea, headache, dizziness, fatigue, nasopharyngitis, back pain, and skin rash. No significant change in the tolerability profile was observed with continued treatment for up to 384 weeks.
Grades 3 to 4 laboratory abnormalities were similar in subjects continuing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets treatment for up to 384 weeks in these trials. ALT flares generally occurred within the first 4 to 8 weeks of treatment and were accompanied by decreases in HBV DNA levels. No subject had evidence of decompensation.
ALT flares typically resolved within 4 to 8 weeks without changes in study medication. Clinical Trials in Adult Subjects with Chronic Hepatitis B and Decompensated Liver Disease In a small randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial, subjects with CHB and decompensated liver disease received treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets or other antiviral drugs for up to 48 weeks. Among the 45 subjects receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse reactions of any severity were abdominal pain subjects died through Week 48 of the trial due to progression of liver disease.
Three of 45 (7%) subjects discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. Three of these subjects (each of whom had a Child-Pugh score greater than or equal to 10 and MELD score greater than or equal to 14 at entry) developed renal failure. Because both tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and decompensated liver disease may have an impact on renal function, the contribution of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets to renal impairment in this population is difficult to ascertain.
One of 45 subjects experienced an on-treatment hepatic flare during the 48-Week trial. Clinical Trials in Pediatric Subjects 12 Years of Age and Older with Chronic Hepatitis B Assessment of adverse reactions is based on one randomized study (Study GS-US-174-0115) in 106 pediatric subjects (12 to less than 18 years of age) infected with chronic hepatitis B receiving treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets (N=52) or placebo (N=54) for 72 weeks. In this study, both the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and placebo treatment arms experienced an overall increase in mean lumbar spine BMD over 72 weeks, as expected for an adolescent population.
Three subjects in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group and two subjects in the placebo group had significant (greater than 4%) lumbar spine BMD loss at Week 72. At baseline, mean BMD Z-scores in subjects randomized to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets were −0.43 for lumbar spine and −0.20 for total body, and mean BMD Z-scores in subjects randomized to placebo were −0.28 for lumbar spine and −0.26 for total body. As observed in pediatric studies of HIV-infected patients, skeletal growth (height) appeared to be unaffected.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been identified during postapproval use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. Because postmarketing reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Immune System Disorders allergic reaction, including angioedema Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders lactic acidosis, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders dyspnea Gastrointestinal Disorders pancreatitis, increased amylase, abdominal pain Hepatobiliary Disorders hepatic steatosis, hepatitis, increased liver enzymes (most commonly AST, ALT gamma GT) Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders rash Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders rhabdomyolysis, osteomalacia (manifested as bone pain and which may contribute to fractures), muscular weakness, myopathy Renal and Urinary Disorders acute renal failure, renal failure, acute tubular necrosis, Fanconi syndrome, proximal renal tubulopathy, interstitial nephritis (including acute cases), nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, renal insufficiency, increased creatinine, proteinuria, polyuria General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions asthenia The following adverse reactions, listed under the body system headings above, may occur as a consequence of proximal renal tubulopathy: rhabdomyolysis, osteomalacia, hypokalemia, muscular weakness, myopathy, hypophosphatemia.
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets +3TC+EFV | d4T+3TC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| N=299 | N=301 | |
| Body as a Whole Headache Pain Fever Abdominal pain Back pain Asthenia | 14% 13% 8% 7% 9% 6% | 17% 12% 7% 12% 8% 7% |
| Digestive System Diarrhea Nausea Dyspepsia Vomiting | 11% 8% 4% 5% | 13% 9% 5% 9% |
| Metabolic Disorders Lipodystrophy b | 1% | 8% |
| Musculoskeletal Arthralgia Myalgia | 5% 3% | 7% 5% |
| Nervous System Depression Insomnia Dizziness Peripheral neuropathy c Anxiety | 11% 5% 3% 1% 6% | 10% 8% 6% 5% 6% |
| Respiratory Pneumonia | 5% | 5% |
| Skin and Appendages Rash event d | 18% | 12% |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets+3TC+EFV | d4T+3TC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| N=299 | N = 301 | |
| Any ≥ Grade 3 Laboratory Abnormality | 36% | 42% |
| Fasting Cholesterol (>240 mg/dL) | 19% | 40% |
| Creatine Kinase (M: >990 U/L; F: >845 U/L) | 12% | 12% |
| Serum Amylase (>175 U/L) | 9% | 8% |
| AST (M: >180 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 5% | 7% |
| ALT (M: >215 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 4% | 5% |
| Hematuria (>100 RBC/HPF) | 7% | 7% |
| Neutrophils (<750/mm 3 ) | 3% | 1% |
| Fasting Triglycerides (>750 mg/dL) | 1% | 9% |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets b +FTC+EFV | AZT/3TC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| N=257 | N=254 | |
| Gastrointestinal Disorder Diarrhea Nausea Vomiting | 9% 9% 2% | 5% 7% 5% |
| General Disorders and Administration Site Condition Fatigue | 9% | 8% |
| Infections and Infestations Sinusitis Upper respiratory tract infections Nasopharyngitis | 8% 8% 5% | 4% 5% 3% |
| Nervous System Disorders Headache Dizziness | 6% 8% | 5% 7% |
| Psychiatric Disorders Depression Insomnia | 9% 5% | 7% 7% |
| Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Rash event c | 7% | 9% |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate a Tablets+FTC+EFV | AZT/3TC+EFV | |
|---|---|---|
| N=257 | N=254 | |
| Any ≥ Grade 3 Laboratory Abnormality | 30% | 26% |
| Fasting Cholesterol (>240 mg/dL) | 22% | 24% |
| Creatine Kinase (M: >990 U/L; F: >845 U/L) | 9% | 7% |
| Serum Amylase (>175 U/L) | 8% | 4% |
| Alkaline Phosphatase (>550 U/L) | 1% | 0% |
| AST (M: >180 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 3% | 3% |
| ALT (M: >215 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 2% | 3% |
| Hemoglobin (<8 mg/dL) | 0% | 4% |
| Hyperglycemia (>250 mg/dL) | 2% | 1% |
| Hematuria (>75 RBC/HPF) | 3% | 2% |
| Glycosuria (³3+) | <1% | 1% |
| Neutrophils (<750/mm 3 ) | 3% | 5% |
| Fasting Triglycerides (>750 mg/dL) | 4% | 2% |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets ( N=3 68) (Week 0 -2 4) | Placebo ( N=1 82) (Week 0 -2 4) | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets ( N=3 68) (Week 0 -4 8) | Placebo C rosso ver to T enofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets ( N=1 70) (Week 2 4 -4 8) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body as a Whole Asthenia Pain He ad a che Abdomi nal p ain Back pain Ch e st pain Fever | 7% 7% 5% 4% 3% 3% 2% | 6% 7% 5% 3% 3% 1% 2% | 11% 12% 8% 7% 4% 3% 4% | 1% 4% 2% 6% 2% 2% 2% |
| Dig estive System Diarr hea Na u s ea Vomiting Anorexia Dys pe psia Flatule nce | 11% 8% 4% 3% 3% 3% | 10% 5% 1% 2% 2% 1% | 16% 11% 7% 4% 4% 4% | 11% 7% 5% 1% 2% 1% |
| R espiratory Pneum onia | 2% | 0% | 3% | 2% |
| Ner vous S ys tem De pr ess ion Insomn ia Perip heral neuropathy b Dizzi ness | 4% 3% 3% 1% | 3% 2% 3% 3% | 8% 4% 5% 3% | 4% 4% 2% 1% |
| Skin and A ppend age R ash event c Sweating | 5% 3% | 4% 2% | 7% 3% | 1% 1% |
| Musculoskeletal Myalgia | 3% | 3% | 4% | 1% |
| Metabol ic Wei ght loss | 2% | 1% | 4% | 2% |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets ( N=3 68) (Week 0-2 4) | Placebo ( N=1 82) (Week 0-2 4) | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets ( N=3 68) (Week 0-4 8) | Placebo Cro sso ver to Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (N=170) (Week 24-48) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Any ≥ Gra de 3 Lab orat ory Abnor mality | 25% | 38% | 35% | 34% |
| Triglyceri des (> 750 mg/ dL) | 8% | 13% | 11% | 9% |
| Cr eatine Kin ase (M: >9 90 U/ L; F: >845 U/L) | 7% | 14% | 12% | 12% |
| Serum Amyl a se (>1 75 U/ L) | 6% | 7% | 7% | 6% |
| Glycosuria (≥ 3+) | 3% | 3% | 3% | 2% |
| AST (M: >180 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 3% | 3% | 4% | 5% |
| ALT (M: >215 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 2% | 2% | 4% | 5% |
| Serum Gl u c o se (>2 50 U/ L) | 2% | 4% | 3% | 3% |
| Neutrophi ls (<7 50/mm 3 ) | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets (N=426) | HEPSERA (N=215) | |
|---|---|---|
| Any ≥ Grade 3 Laboratory Abnormality | 19% | 13% |
| Creatine Kinase (M: >990 U/L; F: >845 U/L) | 2% | 3% |
| Serum Amylase (>175 U/L) | 4% | 1% |
| Glycosuria (≥3+) | 3% | <1% |
| AST (M: >180 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 4% | 4% |
| ALT (M: >215 U/L; F: >170 U/L) | 10% | 6% |
Warnings & Cautions for Tenofovir Disoproxil
Exacerbation of Hepatitis after Discontinuation of Treatment Discontinuation of anti-HBV therapy, including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, may be associated with severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis. Patients infected with HBV who discontinue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should be closely monitored with both clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least several months after stopping treatment. If appropriate, resumption of anti-hepatitis B therapy may be warranted.
New Onset or Worsening Renal Impairment Tenofovir is principally eliminated by the kidney. Renal impairment, including cases of acute renal failure and Fanconi syndrome (renal tubular injury with severe hypophosphatemia), has been reported with the use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. It is recommended that estimated creatinine clearance be assessed in all patients prior to initiating therapy and as clinically appropriate during therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets.
In patients at risk of renal dysfunction, including patients who have previously experienced renal events while receiving HEPSERA ®, it is recommended that estimated creatinine clearance, serum phosphorus, urine glucose, and urine protein be assessed prior to initiation of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, and periodically during tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets therapy. Dosing interval adjustment of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and close monitoring of renal function are recommended in all patients with creatinine clearance below 50 mL/min. No safety or efficacy data are available in patients with renal impairment who received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets using these dosing guidelines, so the potential benefit of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets therapy should be assessed against the potential risk of renal toxicity.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should be avoided with concurrent or recent use of a nephrotoxic agent (e.g., high-dose or multiple non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)). Cases of acute renal failure after initiation of high dose or multiple NSAIDs have been reported in HIV-infected patients with risk factors for renal dysfunction who appeared stable on tenofovir DF. Some patients required hospitalization and renal replacement therapy.
Alternatives to NSAIDs should be considered, if needed, in patients at risk for renal dysfunction. Persistent or worsening bone pain, pain in extremities, fractures and/or muscular pain or weakness may be manifestations of proximal renal tubulopathy and should prompt an evaluation of renal function in at-risk patients.
Lactic Acidosis/Severe Hepatomegaly with Steatosis
Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogs, including tenofovir DF, alone or in combination with other antiretrovirals. Treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should be suspended in any patient who develops clinical or laboratory findings suggestive of lactic acidosis or pronounced hepatotoxicity (which may include hepatomegaly and steatosis even in the absence of marked transaminase elevations).
Coadministration with Other Products
Tenofovirdisoproxil fumarate tablets should not be used in combination with other drugs containing tenofovir DF or tenofovir alafenamide, including ATRIPLA, BIKTARVY, COMPLERA, DESCOVY,GENVOYA,ODEFSEY, STRIBILD, TRUVADA, or VEMLIDY. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should not be administered in combination with HEPSERA (adefovir dipivoxil).
Patients Coinfected with HIV-1 and HBV Due to the risk of development of HIV-1 resistance, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should only be used in HIV-1 and HBV coinfected patients as part of an appropriate antiretroviral combination regimen. HIV-1 antibody testing should be offered to all HBV-infected patients before initiating therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. It is also recommended that all patients with HIV-1 be tested for the presence of chronic hepatitis B before initiating treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets.
Bone Effects Bone Mineral Density
In clinical trials in HIV-1 infected adults, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets were associated with slightly greater decreases in bone mineral density (BMD) and increases in biochemical markers of bone metabolism, suggesting increased bone turnover relative to comparators. Serum parathyroid hormone levels and 1,25 Vitamin D levels were also higher in subjects receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. Clinical trials evaluating tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in pediatric and adolescent subjects were conducted.
Under normal circumstances, BMD increases rapidly in pediatric patients. In HIV-1 infected subjects aged 2 years to less than 18 years, bone effects were similar to those observed in adult subjects and suggest increased bone turnover. Total body BMD gain was less in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated HIV-1 infected pediatric subjects as compared to the control groups.
Similar trends were observed in chronic hepatitis B infected adolescent subjects aged 12 years to less than 18 years. In all pediatric trials, skeletal growth (height) appeared to be unaffected. The effects of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-associated changes in BMD and biochemical markers on long-term bone health and future fracture risk are unknown.
Assessment of BMD should be considered for adults and pediatric patients who have a history of pathologic bone fracture or other risk factors for osteoporosis or bone loss. Although the effect of supplementation with calcium and vitamin D was not studied, such supplementation may be beneficial for all patients. If bone abnormalities are suspected then appropriate consultation should be obtained.
Mineralization Defects: Cases of osteomalacia associated with proximal renal tubulopathy, manifested as bone pain or pain in extremities and which may contribute to fractures, have been reported in association with the use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. Arthralgias and muscle pain or weakness have also been reported in cases of proximal renal tubulopathy. Hypophosphatemia and osteomalacia secondary to proximal renal tubulopathy should be considered in patients at risk of renal dysfunction who present with persistent or worsening bone or muscle symptoms while receiving products containing tenofovir DF.
Immune Reconstitution Syndrome
Immune reconstitution syndrome has been reported in HIV-infected patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy, including tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. During the initial phase of combination antiretroviral treatment, patients whose immune system responds may develop an inflammatory response to indolent or residual opportunistic infections (such as Mycobacterium avium infection, cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, or tuberculosis), which may necessitate further evaluation and treatment. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves’ disease, polymyositis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reconstitution; however, the time to onset is more variable, and can occur many months after initiation of treatment.
Early Virologic Failure
Clinical trials in HIV-infected subjects have demonstrated that certain regimens that only contain three nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) are generally less effective than triple drug regimens containing two NRTIs in combination with either a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or a HIV-1 protease inhibitor. In particular, early virological failure and high rates of resistance substitutions have been reported. Triple nucleoside regimens should therefore be used with caution.
Patients on a therapy utilizing a triple nucleoside-only regimen should be carefully monitored and considered for treatment modification.
Drug Interactions with Tenofovir Disoproxil
Drugs Affecting Renal Function Tenofovir is primarily eliminated by the kidneys. Coadministration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets with drugs that are eliminated by active tubular secretion may increase concentrations of tenofovir and/or the coadministered drug. Some examples include, but are not limited to, acyclovir, cidofovir, ganciclovir, valacyclovir, valganciclovir, aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin), and high-dose or multiple NSAIDs.
Drugs that decrease renal function may increase concentrations of tenofovir. In the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should not be administered in combination with HEPSERA (adefovir dipivoxil).
Established and Significant Interactions Table 11 provides a listing of established or clinically significant drug interactions. The drug interactions described are based on studies conducted with tenofovir DF. Table 11 Established and Significanta Drug Interactions: Alteration in Dose or Regimen May Be Recommended Based on Drug Interaction Trials a.
This table is not all inclusive. b. ↑=Increase, ↓=Decrease
| Concomitant Drug Class: Drug Name | Effect on Concentration b | Clinical Comment |
|---|---|---|
| NRTI: didanosine | ↑ didanosine | Patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and didanosine should be monitored closely for didanosine-associated adverse reactions. Discontinue didanosine in patients who develop didanosine-associated adverse reactions. Higher didanosine concentrations could potentiate didanosine-associated adverse reactions, including pancreatitis, and neuropathy. Suppression of CD4+ cell counts has been observed in patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets with didanosine 400 mg daily. In patients weighing greater than 60 kg, reduce the didanosine dose to 250 mg when it is coadministered with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. In patients weighing less than 60 kg, reduce the didanosine dose to 200 mg when it is coadministered with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. When coadministered, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and Videx EC may be taken under fasted conditions or with a light meal (less than 400 kcal, 20% fat). |
| HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors: atazanavir lopinavir/ritonavir atazanavir/ritonavir darunavir/ritonavir | ↓ atazanavir ↑ tenofovir | When coadministered with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, atazanavir 300 mg should be given with ritonavir 100 mg. Monitor patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets concomitantly with lopinavir/ritonavir, ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, or ritonavir-boosted darunavir for tenofovir DF-associated adverse reactions. Discontinue tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in patients who develop tenofovir DF-associated adverse reactions. |
| Hepatitis C Antiviral Agents: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/ voxilaprevir ledipasvir/sofosbuvir | ↑ tenofovir | Monitor patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets concomitantly with EPCLUSA ® (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir) or VOSEVI ® (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir) for adverse reactions associated with tenofovir DF. Monitor patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets concomitantly with HARVONI ® (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir) without an HIV-1 protease inhibitor/ritonavir or an HIV-1 protease inhibitor/cobicistat combination for adverse reactions associated with tenofovir DF. In patients receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets concomitantly with HARVONI and an HIV-1 protease inhibitor/ritonavir or an HIV-1 protease inhibitor/cobicistat combination, consider an alternative HCV or antiretroviral therapy, as the safety of increased tenofovir concentrations in this setting has not been established. If coadministration is necessary, monitor for adverse reactions associated with tenofovir DF. |
Pregnancy Safety for Tenofovir Disoproxil
Pregnancy Pregnancy Category B There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. Because animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets should be used during pregnancy only if clearly needed. Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry: To monitor fetal outcomes of pregnant women exposed to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, an Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry has been established.
Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients by calling 1-800-258-4263. Risk Summary Animal Data Reproduction studies have been performed in rats and rabbits at doses up to 14 and 19 times the human dose based on body surface area comparisons and revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to tenofovir.
Pediatric Use of Tenofovir Disoproxil
Pediatric Use Pediatric Patients 2 Years of Age and Older with HIV-1 infection The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in pediatric patients aged 2 to less than 18 years is supported by data from two randomized trials in which tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets were administered to HIV-1 infected treatment-experienced subjects. In addition, the pharmacokinetic profile of tenofovir in patients 2 to less than 18 years of age at the recommended doses was similar to that found to be safe and effective in adult clinical trials. In Study 352, 92 treatment-experienced subjects 2 to less than 12 years of age with stable, virologic suppression on stavudine- or zidovudine-containing regimen were randomized to either replace stavudine or zidovudine with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets (N=44) or continue their original regimen (N=48) for 48 weeks.
Five additional subjects over the age of 12 were enrolled and randomized (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets N=4, original regimen N=1) but are not included in the efficacy analysis. After 48 weeks, all eligible subjects were allowed to continue in the study receiving open-label tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. During the 48 week randomized phase of the study, 1 subject in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group discontinued the study prematurely because of virologic failure/lack of efficacy and 3 subjects (2 subjects in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group and 1 subject in the stavudine or zidovudine group) discontinued for other reasons.
At baseline, 90% of subjects harbored NRTI resistance-associated substitutions in their HIV-1 isolates. Overall, the trial failed to show a difference in virologic response between the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and placebo treatment groups. Subgroup analyses suggest the lack of difference in virologic response may be attributable to imbalances between treatment arms in baseline viral susceptibility to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and OBR.
Although changes in HIV-1 RNA in these highly treatment-experienced subjects were less than anticipated, the comparability of the pharmacokinetic and safety data to that observed in adults supports the use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in pediatric patients 12 years of age and older who weigh greater than or equal to 35 kg and whose HIV-1 isolate is expected to be sensitive to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets. Safety and effectiveness of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age with HIV-1 infection have not been established. At study entry, the mean HBV DNA was 8.1 log10 copies/mL and mean ALT was 101 U/L.
Of 52 subjects treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, 20 subjects were nucleos(t)ide-naïve and 32 subjects were nucleos(t)ide-experienced. Thirty-one of the 32 nucleos(t)ide-experienced subjects had prior lamivudine experience. One tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated subject experienced sustained HBsAg-loss and seroconversion to anti-HBs during the first 72 weeks of study participation.
Safety and effectiveness of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets in pediatric patients younger than 12 years of age or less than 35 kg with chronic hepatitis B have not been established.
Overdosage Information for Tenofovir Disoproxil
Limited clinical experience at doses higher than the therapeutic dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets 300 mg are available. No severe adverse reactions were reported. The effects of higher doses are not known.
If overdose occurs the patient must be monitored for evidence of toxicity and standard supportive treatment applied as necessary. Tenofovir is efficiently removed by hemodialysis with an extraction coefficient of approximately 54%. Following a single 300 mg dose of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets, a four-hour hemodialysis session removed approximately 10% of the administered tenofovir dose.
Clinical Studies of Tenofovir Disoproxil
Clinical Efficacy in Adults with HIV-1 Infection Treatment-Naïve Adult Patients Study 903 Data through 144 weeks are reported for Study 903, a double-blind, active-controlled multicenter trial comparing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets (300 mg once daily) administered in combination with lamivudine and efavirenz versus stavudine (d4T), lamivudine, and efavirenz in 600 antiretroviral-naïve subjects. Subjects were stratified by baseline HIV-1 RNA and CD4 + cell count. Treatment outcomes through 48 and 144 weeks are presented in Table 18.
Subjects achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL through Week 48 and 144. b. Includes confirmed viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed <400 copies/mL through Week 48 and 144. c. Includes lost to follow-up, subject’s withdrawal, noncompliance, protocol violation and other reasons.
Achievement of plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations of less than 400 copies/mL at Week 144 was similar between the two treatment groups for the population stratified at baseline on the basis of HIV-1 RNA concentration (> or ≤100,000 copies/mL) and CD4 + cell count (< or ≥200 cells/mm 3 ). The mean increase from baseline in CD4 + cell count was 263 cells/mm3 for the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets arm and 283 cells/mm3 for the stavudine arm. Through 144 weeks, 11 subjects in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group and 9 subjects in the stavudine group experienced a new CDC Class C event.
Study 934 Data through 144 weeks are reported for Study 934, a randomized, open-label, active-controlled multicenter trial comparing emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets administered in combination with efavirenz versus zidovudine/lamivudine fixed-dose combination administered in combination with efavirenz in 511 antiretroviral-naïve subjects. From Weeks 96 to 144 of the trial, subjects received a fixed-dose combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir DF with efavirenz in place of emtricitabine + tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets with efavirenz. Subjects achieved and maintained confirmed HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL through Weeks 48 and 144. c.
Includes confirmed viral rebound and failure to achieve confirmed <400 copies/mL through Weeks 48 and 144. d. The difference in the proportion of subjects who achieved and maintained HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL through 48 weeks largely results from the higher number of discontinuations due to adverse events and other reasons in the zidovudine/lamivudine group in this open-label trial. Treatment-Experienced Adult Patients Study 907 Study 907 was a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets added to a stable background regimen of antiretroviral agents in 550 treatment-experienced subjects.
After 24 weeks of blinded trial treatment, all subjects continuing on trial were offered open-label tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets for an additional 24 weeks. Table 20 nd no prior study drug discontinuation at Week 24 and 48, respectively. b. Subjects with HIV-1 RNA ≥400 copies/mL efficacy failure or missing HIV-1 RNA at Week 24 and 48, respectively. c.
Mean change in absolute CD4 + cell counts by Week 48 was +4 cells/mm 3 for the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group. Through Week 24, one subject in the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets group and no subjects in the placebo arm experienced a new CDC Class C event.
Clinical Efficacy in Adults with Chronic Hepatitis B HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Study 0102 was a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets 300 mg compared to HEPSERA 10 mg in 375 HBeAg- (anti-HBe + ) subjects with compensated liver function, the majority of whom were nucleoside-naïve. The primary data analysis was conducted after all subjects reached 48 weeks of treatment and results are summarized below. Table 21 Histological, Virological, Biochemical, and Serological Response at Week 48 a.
Knodell necroinflammatory score improvement of at least 2 points without worsening in Knodell fibrosis. b. The population used for analysis of ALT normalization included only subjects with ALT above ULN at baseline. c. NA = Not Applicable Treatment Beyond 48 Weeks In Studies 0102 (HBeAg-negative) and 0103 (HBeAg-positive), subjects who completed double-blind treatment (389 and 196 subjects who were originally randomized to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets and HEPSERA, respectively) were eligible to roll over to open-label tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets with no interruption in treatment.
At Week 384, both HBsAg loss and seroconversion were approximately 1% in both treatment groups. Of the originally randomized and treated 641 subjects in the two studies, liver biopsy data from 328 subjects who received continuing open-label treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets monotherapy were available for analysis at baseline, Week 48, and Week 240. There were no apparent differences between the subset of subjects who had liver biopsy data at Week 240 and those subjects remaining on open-label tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets without biopsy data that would be expected to affect histological outcomes at Week 240.
In the subjects without cirrhosis at baseline Ishak fibrosis score had either improvement or no change in Ishak fibrosis score at Week 48 and Week 240, respectively. No definitive conclusions can be established about the remaining study population who were not part of this subset analysis. Patients with Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B Study 121 was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets compared to an unapproved antiviral regimen in subjects with chronic hepatitis B, persistent viremia (HBV DNA ≥1,000 IU/mL), and genotypic evidence of lamivudine resistance (rtM204I/V +/- rtL 180M).
One hundred forty-one adult subjects were randomized to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets treatment arm. The mean age of subjects randomized to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets was 47 years (range 18 to 73); had abnormal ALT. Subjects had a mean HBV DNA of 6.4 log10 copies/mL and mean serum ALT of 71 U/L at baseline.
The proportion of subjects with HBV DNA concentrations below 400 copies/mL (69 IU/mL) at Week 96 was similar between the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets monotherapy and the comparator arms. Across the combined chronic hepatitis B treatment trials, the number of subjects with adefovir-resistance associated substitutions at baseline was too small to establish efficacy in this subgroup. Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B and Decompensated Liver Disease Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets were studied in a small randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluating the safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets compared to other antiviral drugs in subjects with chronic hepatitis B and decompensated liver disease through 48 weeks (Study 0108).
Forty-five adult subjects (37 males and 8 females) were randomized to the tenofovir disoproxil fumarate tablets treatment arm. At baseline, 69% subjects were HBeAg-negative and 31% were HBeAg-positive. Trial endpoints were discontinuation due to an adverse event and confirmed increase in serum creatinine ≥ 0.5 mg/dL or confirmed serum phosphorus of < 2 mg/dL.
At 48 weeks, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-treated subjects achieved an HBV DNA <400 copies/mL (69 IU/mL), and normalized ALT, respectively. The trial was not designed to evaluate treatment impact on clinical endpoints such as progression of liver disease, need for liver transplantation, or death.
| Outcomes | At Week 48 | At Week 144 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets+ 3TC+EFV (N=299) | d4T+ 3TC+EFV (N=301) | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets+ 3TC+EFV (N=299) | d4T+3TC +EFV (N=301) | |
| Responder a | 79% | 82% | 68% | 62% |
| Virologic failure b | 6% | 4% | 10% | 8% |
| Rebound | 5% | 3% | 8% | 7% |
| Never suppressed | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% |
| Added an antiretroviral agent | 1% | 1% | 2% | 1% |
| Death | <1% | 1% | <1% | 2% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event | 6% | 6% | 8% | 13% |
| Discontinued for other reasons c | 8% | 7% | 14% | 15% |
| Outcomes | At Week 48 | At Week 144 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTC + Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets+ EFV (N=244) | AZT/3TC +EFV (N=243) | FTC+T enofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets+EFV (N=227) a | AZT/3TC +EFV (N=229) a | |
| Responder b | 84% | 73% | 71% | 58% |
| Virologic failure c | 2% | 4% | 3% | 6% |
| Rebound | 1% | 3% | 2% | 5% |
| Never suppressed | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| Change in antiretroviral regimen | 1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
| Death | <1% | 1% | 1% | 1% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event | 4% | 9% | 5% | 12% |
| Discontinued for other reasons d | 10% | 14% | 20% | 22% |
| Outcomes | 0–24 weeks | 0–48 weeks | 24–48 weeks | |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets (N=368) | Placebo (N=182) | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets (N=368) | Placebo Crossover to Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets (N=170) | |
| HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/mL a | 40% | 11% | 28% | 30% |
| Virologic failure b | 53% | 84% | 61% | 64% |
| Discontinued due to adverse event | 3% | 3% | 5% | 5% |
| Discontinued for other reasons c | 3% | 3% | 5% | 1% |
| 0102 (HBeAg-) | 0103 (HBeAg+) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets (N=250) | HEPSERA (N=125) | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Tablets(N=176) | HEPSERA (N=90) | |
| Complete Response | 71% | 49% | 67% | 12% |
| Histology Histological Response a | 72% | 69% | 74% | 68% |
| HBV DNA <400 copies/mL (<69 IU/mL) | 93% | 63% | 76% | 13% |
| ALT Normalized ALT b | 76% | 77% | 68% | 54% |
| Serology HBeAg Loss/ Seroconversion | NA c | NA c | 20%/19% | 16%/16% |
| HBsAg Loss/ Seroconversion | 0/0 | 0/0 | 3%/1% | 0/0 |
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Tenofovir Disoproxil?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Tenofovir Disoproxil Prices