Sunitinib Drug Information
Generic name: SUNITINIB MALATE
Uses of Sunitinib
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Sunitinib malate capsules are indicated for the treatment of adult patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) after disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib mesylate.
Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Sunitinib malate capsules are indicated for the treatment of adult patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Adjuvant Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma
Sunitinib malate capsules are indicated for the adjuvant treatment of adult patients at high risk of recurrent RCC following nephrectomy.
Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Sunitinib malate capsules are indicated for the treatment of progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) in adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease.
Dosage & Administration of Sunitinib
Recommended Dosage for GIST and Advanced RCC
The recommended dosage of sunitinib malate capsules for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is 50 mg taken orally once daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (Schedule 4/2) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Sunitinib malate capsules may be taken with or without food.
Recommended Dosage for Adjuvant Treatment of RCC
The recommended dosage of sunitinib malate capsules for the adjuvant treatment of RCC is 50 mg taken orally once daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (Schedule 4/2), for nine 6-week cycles.
Recommended Dosage for pNET
The recommended dosage of sunitinib malate capsules for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) is 37.5 mg taken orally once daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Dosage Modifications for Adverse Reactions
To manage adverse reactions, the recommended dosage modifications are provided in Table 1. Table 2 provides the recommended dosage reductions of sunitinib malate capsules for adverse reactions. Table 1.
Recommended Dosage Reductions of Sunitinib Malate Capsules for Dermatological toxicities Erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), Necrotizing fasciitis Any Grade Permanently discontinue. Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome
Dosage Modification for Drug Interactions Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors Select an alternate concomitant medication with no or minimal enzyme inhibition potential. If coadministration of sunitinib malate capsules with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor cannot be avoided, consider a dose reduction for sunitinib malate capsules to a minimum dosage as follows: GIST and RCC: 37.5 mg orally once daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (Schedule 4/2) pNET: 25 mg orally once daily Strong CYP3A4 Inducers Select an alternate concomitant medication with no or minimal enzyme induction potential. If coadministration of sunitinib malate capsules with a strong CYP3A4 inducer cannot be avoided, consider a dose increase for sunitinib malate capsules to a maximum dosage as follows: GIST and RCC: 87.5 mg orally once daily, on a schedule of 4 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off (Schedule 4/2) pNET: 62.5 mg orally once daily If the dose of sunitinib malate capsules is increased, monitor patients carefully for adverse reactions.
Dosage Modification for End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis No starting dose adjustment is required in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. However, given the decreased exposure compared to patients with normal renal function, subsequent doses may be increased gradually up to 2-fold based on safety and tolerability.
| Indications | GIST | RCC | pNET | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Advanced RCC | Adjuvant RCC | |||
| First dose reduction | 37.5 mg once daily | 37.5 mg once daily | 37.5 mg once daily | 25 mg once daily |
| Second dose reduction | 25 mg once daily | 25 mg once daily | NA | NA |
| Adverse Reaction | Severity | Dosage Modifications for Sunitinib Malate Capsules |
|---|---|---|
| Hepatotoxicity [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )] | Grade 3 | Withhold until resolution to Grade 0 to 1 or baseline. Resume at a reduced dose. For recurring Grade 3 permanently discontinue. |
| Grade 4 | Permanently discontinue. | |
| Cardiovascular events [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2 )] | Asymptomatic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 20% but less than 50% below baseline or below the lower limit of normal if baseline was not obtained) | Withhold until resolution to Grade 0 to 1 or baseline. Resume at reduced dose. |
| Clinically manifested congestive heart failure (CHF) | Permanently discontinue. | |
| Hypertension [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.4 )] | Grade 3 | Withhold until resolution to Grade 0 to 1 or baseline. Resume at a reduced dose. |
| Grade 4 | Permanently discontinue. | |
| Hemorrhagic events [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.5 )] | Grade 3 or 4 | Withhold until resolution to Grade 0 to 1 or baseline. Either resume at a reduced dose or discontinue depending on the severity and persistence of adverse reaction. |
| Thrombotic microangiopathy [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.7 )] | Any Grade | Permanently discontinue. |
| Proteinuria or Nephrotic syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.8 )] | 3 or more grams proteinuria in 24 hours in the absence of nephrotic syndrome | Withhold until resolution to Grade 0 to 1 or baseline. Resume at a reduced dose. |
| Nephrotic syndrome or recurrent proteinuria of 3 or more grams per 24 hours despite dose reductions | Permanently discontinue. | |
| Dermatological toxicities Erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), Necrotizing fasciitis [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.9 )] | Any Grade | Permanently discontinue. |
| Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.10 )] | Any Grade | Permanently discontinue. |
| Osteonecrosis of the jaw [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.13 )] | Any Grade | The safety of resumption of sunitinib malate capsules after osteonecrosis has not been established. Either resume at a reduced dose or discontinue depending on the severity and persistence of the adverse reaction. |
| Impaired wound healing [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.14 )] | Any Grade | The safety of resumption of sunitinib malate capsules after resolution of wound healing has not been established. Either resume at a reduced dose or discontinue depending on the severity and persistence of the adverse reaction. |
Side Effects of Sunitinib
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. The pooled safety population described in the Warnings and Precautions reflect exposure to sunitinib malate in 7,527 patients with GIST, RCC (advanced and adjuvant), or pNET. In this pooled safety population, the most common adverse reactions (≥25%) were fatigue/asthenia, diarrhea, mucositis/stomatitis, nausea, decreased appetite/anorexia, vomiting, abdominal pain, hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, bleeding events, dysgeusia/altered taste, dyspepsia, and thrombocytopenia.
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor The safety of sunitinib malate was evaluated in Study 1, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which previously treated patients with GIST received sunitinib malate 50 mg daily on Schedule 4/2 (n = 202) or placebo (n = 102). Permanent discontinuation due to an adverse reaction occurred in 7% of patients in the sunitinib malate arm. Dose reductions occurred in 11% and dose interruptions occurred in 29% of patients who received sunitinib malate.
Table 3 summarizes the adverse reactions for Study 1. Table 3. Adverse Reactions Reported in ≥10% of GIST Patients Who Received Sunitinib Malate in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase and More Commonly Than in Patients Given Other clinically relevant adverse reactions included oral pain other than mucositis/stomatitis in 6%; hair color changes in 7%; alopecia in 5% of patients who received sunitinib malate.
Table 4 summarizes the laboratory abnormalities in Study 1. Table 4. Laboratory Abnormalities Reported in ≥10% of GIST Patients Who Received Sunitinib Malate or Placebo in the Double-Blind Treatment Phase* in Study 1 After an interim analysis, the study was unblinded and patients on the placebo arm were given the opportunity to receive open-label sunitinib malate.
Permanent discontinuation due to an adverse reaction occurred in 20% of patients who received sunitinib malate. Dosage interruption occurred in 46% and dose reduction occurred in 28% of patients who received sunitinib malate. Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma The safety of sunitinib malate was evaluated in Study 3, a double-blind, active-controlled trial in which previously untreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic RCC received sunitinib malate 50 mg daily on Schedule 4/2 (n = 375) or interferon alfa 9 million International Units (MIU) (n = 360).
Dose interruptions occurred in 54% and dose reductions occurred in 52% of patients who received sunitinib malate. Table 5 summarizes the adverse reactions for Study 3. Table 5.
Table 6 summarizes the laboratory abnormalities in Study 3. Table 6. Laboratory Abnormalities Reported in ≥ Long-Term Safety in RCC The long-term safety of sunitinib malate in patients with metastatic RCC was analyzed across 9 completed clinical studies conducted in the first-line, bevacizumab-refractory, and cytokine-refractory treatment settings.
Prolonged treatment with sunitinib malate did not appear to be associated with new types of adverse reactions. There appeared to be no increase in the yearly incidence of adverse reactions at later time points. Hypothyroidism increased during the second year of treatment with new cases reported up to year 4.
Adjuvant Treatment of RCC The safety of sunitinib malate was evaluated in S-TRAC, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which patients who had undergone nephrectomy for RCC received sunitinib malate 50 mg daily on Schedule 4/2 (n = 306) or placebo (n = 304). Adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation in >2% of patients include hand-foot syndrome and fatigue/asthenia. Table 7 summarizes the adverse reactions in S-TRAC.
Table 7. Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors The safety of sunitinib malate was evaluated in Study 6, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which patients with progressive pNET received sunitinib malate 37.5 mg once daily (n = 83) or placebo (n = 82). Dose interruptions occurred in 30% and dose reductions occurred in 31% of patients who received sunitinib malate.
Table 8 summarizes the adverse reactions in Study 6. Table 8. Adverse Reactions Reported in ≥10% of Patients with pNET Who Received Sunitinib Malate and More Commonly Than in Patients Given Table 9 summarizes the laboratory abnormalities in Study 6.
Table 9. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Blood and lymphatic system disorders: hemorrhage associated with thrombocytopenia.
Gastrointestinal disorders: esophagitis. Hepatobiliary disorders: cholecystitis, particularly acalculous cholecystitis. Immune system disorders: hypersensitivity reactions, including angioedema.
Infections and infestations: serious infection (with or without neutropenia). The infections most commonly observed with sunitinib malate include respiratory, urinary tract, skin infections, and sepsis/septic shock. Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: fistula formation, sometimes associated with tumor necrosis and/or regression; myopathy and/or rhabdomyolysis with or without acute renal failure.
Renal and urinary disorders: renal impairment and/or failure. Respiratory disorders: pulmonary embolism, pleural effusion. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: pyoderma gangrenosum, including positive de‑challenges.
Vascular disorders: arterial (including aortic) aneurysms, dissections, and rupture; arterial thromboembolic events. The most frequent events included cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, and cerebral infarction. General disorders and administration site conditions: impaired wound healing. including some fatalities
| Adverse Reaction | GIST | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate (N = 202) | Placebo (N = 102) | |||
| All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 % | All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 % | |
| Any Adverse Reaction | 94 | 56 | 97 | 51 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| Diarrhea | 40 | 4 | 27 | 0 |
| Mucositis/stomatitis | 29 | 1 | 18 | 2 |
| Constipation | 20 | 0 | 14 | 2 |
| Metabolism/Nutrition | ||||
| Anorexia a | 33 | 1 | 29 | 5 |
| Asthenia | 22 | 5 | 11 | 3 |
| Dermatology | ||||
| Skin discoloration | 30 | 0 | 23 | 0 |
| Rash | 14 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
| Hand-foot syndrome | 14 | 4 | 10 | 3 |
| Neurology | ||||
| Altered taste | 21 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Cardiac | ||||
| Hypertension | 15 | 4 | 11 | 0 |
| Musculoskeletal | ||||
| Myalgia/limb pain | 14 | 1 | 9 | 1 |
| Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. | ||||
| Abbreviations: GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; N = number of patients. | ||||
| a Includes decreased appetite. | ||||
| Laboratory Abnormality | GIST | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate (N = 202) | Placebo (N = 102) | |||
| All Grades* % | Grade 3 to 4*,a % | All Grades* % | Grade 3 to 4*,b % | |
| Any Laboratory Abnormality | 34 | 22 | ||
| Hematology | ||||
| Neutrophils decreased | 53 | 10 | 4 | 0 |
| Lymphocytes decreased | 38 | 0 | 16 | 0 |
| Platelets decreased | 38 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
| Hemoglobin decreased | 26 | 3 | 22 | 2 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| AST/ALT increased | 39 | 2 | 23 | 1 |
| Lipase increased | 25 | 10 | 17 | 7 |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | 24 | 4 | 21 | 4 |
| Amylase increased | 17 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
| Total bilirubin increased | 16 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
| Indirect bilirubin increased | 10 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| Renal/Metabolic | ||||
| Creatinine increased | 12 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Potassium decreased | 12 | 1 | 4 | 0 |
| Sodium increased | 10 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
| Cardiac | ||||
| Decreased LVEF | 11 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. | ||||
| Abbreviations: ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; N = number of patients. | ||||
| a Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities in patients on sunitinib malate included alkaline phosphatase (1%), lipase (2%), creatinine (1%), potassium decreased (1%), neutrophils (2%), hemoglobin (2%), and platelets (1%). | ||||
| b Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities in patients on placebo included amylase (1%), lipase (1%), and hemoglobin (2%). | ||||
| Adverse Reaction | Treatment-Naïve RCC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate (N = 375) | Interferon Alfa (N = 360) | |||
| All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 a % | All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 b % | |
| Any Adverse Reaction | 99 | 77 | 99 | 55 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| Diarrhea | 66 | 10 | 21 | <1 |
| Nausea | 58 | 6 | 41 | 2 |
| Mucositis/stomatitis | 47 | 3 | 5 | <1 |
| Vomiting | 39 | 5 | 17 | 1 |
| Dyspepsia | 34 | 2 | 4 | 0 |
| Abdominal pain c | 30 | 5 | 12 | 1 |
| Constipation | 23 | 1 | 14 | <1 |
| Dry mouth | 13 | 0 | 7 | <1 |
| Oral pain | 14 | <1 | 1 | 0 |
| Flatulence | 14 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| GERD/reflux esophagitis | 12 | <1 | 1 | 0 |
| Glossodynia | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Hemorrhoids | 10 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Constitutional | ||||
| Fatigue | 62 | 15 | 56 | 15 |
| Asthenia | 26 | 11 | 22 | 6 |
| Fever | 22 | 1 | 37 | <1 |
| Weight decreased | 16 | <1 | 17 | 1 |
| Chills | 14 | 1 | 31 | 0 |
| Chest Pain | 13 | 2 | 7 | 1 |
| Influenza like illness | 5 | 0 | 15 | <1 |
| Metabolism/Nutrition | ||||
| Anorexia d | 48 | 3 | 42 | 2 |
| Neurology | ||||
| Altered taste e | 47 | <1 | 15 | 0 |
| Headache | 23 | 1 | 19 | 0 |
| Dizziness | 11 | <1 | 14 | 1 |
| Hemorrhage/Bleeding | ||||
| Bleeding, all sites | 37 | 4 f | 10 | 1 |
| Cardiac | ||||
| Hypertension | 34 | 13 | 4 | <1 |
| Edema peripheral | 24 | 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Ejection fraction decreased | 16 | 3 | 5 | 2 |
| Dermatology | ||||
| Rash | 29 | 2 | 11 | <1 |
| Hand-foot syndrome | 29 | 8 | 1 | 0 |
| Skin discoloration/yellow skin | 25 | <1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dry skin | 23 | <1 | 7 | 0 |
| Hair color changes | 20 | 0 | <1 | 0 |
| Alopecia | 14 | 0 | 9 | 0 |
| Erythema | 12 | <1 | 1 | 0 |
| Pruritus | 12 | <1 | 7 | <1 |
| Musculoskeletal | ||||
| Pain in extremity/limb discomfort | 40 | 5 | 30 | 2 |
| Arthralgia | 30 | 3 | 19 | 1 |
| Back pain | 28 | 5 | 14 | 2 |
| Respiratory | ||||
| Cough | 27 | 1 | 14 | <1 |
| Dyspnea | 26 | 6 | 20 | 4 |
| Nasopharyngitis | 14 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Oropharyngeal pain | 14 | <1 | 2 | 0 |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | 11 | <1 | 2 | 0 |
| Endocrine | ||||
| Hypothyroidism | 16 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Psychiatric | ||||
| Insomnia | 15 | <1 | 10 | 0 |
| Depression g | 11 | 0 | 14 | 1 |
| Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. | ||||
| Abbreviations: ARs = adverse reactions; N = number of patients; RCC = renal cell carcinoma. | ||||
| a Grade 4 ARs in patients on sunitinib malate included back pain (1%), arthralgia (<1%), dyspnea (<1%), asthenia (<1%), fatigue (<1%), limb pain (<1%), and rash (<1%). | ||||
| b Grade 4 ARs in patients on interferon alfa included dyspnea (1%), fatigue (1%), abdominal pain (<1%), and depression (<1%). | ||||
| c Includes flank pain. | ||||
| d Includes decreased appetite. | ||||
| e Includes ageusia, hypogeusia, and dysgeusia. | ||||
| f Includes 1 patient with Grade 5 gastric hemorrhage. | ||||
| g Includes depressed mood. | ||||
| Laboratory Abnormality | Treatment-Naïve RCC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate (N = 375) | Interferon Alfa (N = 360) | |||
| All Grades* % | Grade 3 to 4*,a % | All Grades* % | Grade 3 to 4*,b % | |
| Hematology | ||||
| Hemoglobin decreased | 79 | 8 | 69 | 5 |
| Neutrophils decreased | 77 | 17 | 49 | 9 |
| Platelets decreased | 68 | 9 | 24 | 1 |
| Lymphocytes decreased | 68 | 18 | 68 | 26 |
| Renal/Metabolic | ||||
| Creatinine increased | 70 | <1 | 51 | <1 |
| Creatine kinase increased | 49 | 2 | 11 | 1 |
| Uric acid increased | 46 | 14 | 33 | 8 |
| Calcium decreased | 42 | 1 | 40 | 1 |
| Phosphorus decreased | 31 | 6 | 24 | 6 |
| Albumin decreased | 28 | 1 | 20 | 0 |
| Glucose increased | 23 | 6 | 15 | 6 |
| Sodium decreased | 20 | 8 | 15 | 4 |
| Glucose decreased | 17 | 0 | 12 | <1 |
| Potassium increased | 16 | 3 | 17 | 4 |
| Calcium increased | 13 | <1 | 10 | 1 |
| Potassium decreased | 13 | 1 | 2 | <1 |
| Sodium increased | 13 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| AST increased | 56 | 2 | 38 | 2 |
| Lipase increased | 56 | 18 | 46 | 8 |
| ALT increased | 51 | 3 | 40 | 2 |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | 46 | 2 | 37 | 2 |
| Amylase increased | 35 | 6 | 32 | 3 |
| Total bilirubin increased | 20 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Indirect bilirubin increased | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. | ||||
| Abbreviations: ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; N = number of patients; RCC = renal cell carcinoma. | ||||
| a Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities in patients on sunitinib malate included uric acid (14%), lipase (3%), neutrophils (2%), lymphocytes (2%), hemoglobin (2%), platelets (1%), amylase (1%), ALT (<1%), creatine kinase (<1%), creatinine (<1%), glucose increased (<1%), calcium decreased (<1%), phosphorous (<1%), potassium increased (<1%), and sodium decreased (<1%). | ||||
| b Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities in patients on interferon alfa included uric acid (8%), lymphocytes (2%), lipase (1%), neutrophils (1%), amylase (<1%), calcium increased (<1%), glucose decreased (<1%), potassium increased (<1%), and hemoglobin (<1%). | ||||
| Adverse Reaction | Adjuvant Treatment of RCC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate (N = 306) | Placebo (N = 304) | |||
| All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 % | All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 % | |
| Any Adverse Reaction | 99 | 60 | 88 | 15 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| Mucositis/Stomatitis a | 61 | 6 | 15 | 0 |
| Diarrhea | 57 | 4 | 22 | <1 |
| Nausea | 34 | 2 | 15 | 0 |
| Dyspepsia | 27 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
| Abdominal pain b | 25 | 2 | 9 | <1 |
| Vomiting | 19 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
| Constipation | 12 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Constitutional | ||||
| Fatigue/Asthenia | 57 | 8 | 34 | 2 |
| Localized edema c | 18 | <1 | <1 | 0 |
| Pyrexia | 12 | <1 | 6 | 0 |
| Dermatology | ||||
| Hand-foot syndrome | 50 | 16 | 10 | <1 |
| Rash d | 24 | 2 | 12 | 0 |
| Hair color changes | 22 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Skin discoloration/Yellow skin | 18 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Dry skin | 14 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Cardiac | ||||
| Hypertension e | 39 | 8 | 14 | 1 |
| Edema/Peripheral edema | 10 | <1 | 7 | 0 |
| Neurology | ||||
| Altered taste f | 38 | <1 | 6 | 0 |
| Headache | 19 | <1 | 12 | 0 |
| Endocrine | ||||
| Hypothyroidism/TSH increased | 24 | <1 | 4 | 0 |
| Hemorrhage/Bleeding | ||||
| Bleeding events, all sites g | 24 | <1 | 5 | <1 |
| Metabolism/Nutrition | ||||
| Anorexia/Decreased appetite | 19 | <1 | 5 | 0 |
| Musculoskeletal | ||||
| Pain in extremity | 15 | <1 | 7 | 0 |
| Arthralgia | 11 | <1 | 10 | 0 |
| Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. | ||||
| Abbreviations: ARs = adverse reactions; N = number of patients; RCC = renal cell carcinoma. | ||||
| a Includes mucosal inflammation, stomatitis aphthous ulcer, mouth ulceration, tongue ulceration, oropharyngeal pain, and oral pain. | ||||
| b Includes abdominal pain, abdominal pain lower, and abdominal pain upper. | ||||
| c Includes edema localized, face edema, eyelid edema, periorbital edema, swelling face, and eye edema. | ||||
| d Includes dermatitis, dermatitis psoriasiform, exfoliative rash, genital rash, rash, rash erythematous, rash follicular, rash generalized, rash macular, rash maculopapular, rash papular, and rash pruritic. | ||||
| e Includes hypertension, blood pressure increased, blood pressure systolic increased, blood pressure diastolic increased, and hypertensive crisis. | ||||
| f Includes ageusia, hypogeusia, and dysgeusia. | ||||
| g Includes epistaxis, gingival bleeding, rectal hemorrhage, hemoptysis, anal hemorrhage, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and hematuria. | ||||
| Adverse Reaction | pNET | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate (N = 83) | Placebo (N = 82) | |||
| All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 a % | All Grades % | Grade 3 to 4 % | |
| Any Adverse Reaction | 99 | 54 | 95 | 50 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| Diarrhea | 59 | 5 | 39 | 2 |
| Stomatitis/oral syndromes b | 48 | 6 | 18 | 0 |
| Nausea | 45 | 1 | 29 | 1 |
| Abdominal pain c | 39 | 5 | 34 | 10 |
| Vomiting | 34 | 0 | 31 | 2 |
| Dyspepsia | 15 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Constitutional | ||||
| Asthenia | 34 | 5 | 27 | 4 |
| Fatigue | 33 | 5 | 27 | 9 |
| Weight decreased | 16 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
| Dermatology | ||||
| Hair color changes | 29 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Hand-foot syndrome | 23 | 6 | 2 | 0 |
| Rash | 18 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Dry skin | 15 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
| Cardiac | ||||
| Hypertension | 27 | 10 | 5 | 1 |
| Hemorrhage/Bleeding | ||||
| Bleeding events d | 22 | 0 | 10 | 4 |
| Epistaxis | 21 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
| Neurology | ||||
| Dysgeusia | 21 | 0 | 5 | 0 |
| Headache | 18 | 0 | 13 | 1 |
| Psychiatric | ||||
| Insomnia | 18 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
| Musculoskeletal | ||||
| Arthralgia | 15 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. | ||||
| Abbreviations: N = number of patients; pNET = pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. | ||||
| a Grade 4 adverse reactions in patients on sunitinib malate included fatigue (1%). | ||||
| b Includes aphthous stomatitis, gingival pain, gingivitis, glossitis, glossodynia, mouth ulceration, oral discomfort, oral pain, tongue ulceration, mucosal dryness, mucosal inflammation, and dry mouth. | ||||
| c Includes abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, and abdominal pain upper. | ||||
| d Includes hematemesis, hematochezia, hematoma, hemoptysis, hemorrhage, melena, and metrorrhagia. | ||||
| Laboratory Abnormality | pNET | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate | Placebo | |||
| All Grades* % | Grade 3 to 4*,a % | All Grades* % | Grade 3 to 4*,b % | |
| Gastrointestinal | ||||
| AST increased | 72 | 5 | 70 | 3 |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | 63 | 10 | 70 | 11 |
| ALT increased | 61 | 4 | 55 | 3 |
| Total bilirubin increased | 37 | 1 | 28 | 4 |
| Amylase increased | 20 | 4 | 10 | 1 |
| Lipase increased | 17 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
| Hematology | ||||
| Neutrophils decreased | 71 | 16 | 16 | 0 |
| Hemoglobin decreased | 65 | 0 | 55 | 1 |
| Platelets decreased | 60 | 5 | 15 | 0 |
| Lymphocytes decreased | 56 | 7 | 35 | 4 |
| Renal/Metabolic | ||||
| Glucose increased | 71 | 12 | 78 | 18 |
| Albumin decreased | 41 | 1 | 37 | 1 |
| Phosphorus decreased | 36 | 7 | 22 | 5 |
| Calcium decreased | 34 | 0 | 19 | 0 |
| Sodium decreased | 29 | 2 | 34 | 3 |
| Creatinine increased | 27 | 5 | 28 | 5 |
| Glucose decreased | 22 | 2 | 15 | 4 |
| Potassium decreased | 21 | 4 | 14 | 0 |
| Magnesium decreased | 19 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
| Potassium increased | 18 | 1 | 11 | 1 |
| The denominator used to calculate the rate varied from 52 to 82 for sunitinib malate and 39 to 80 for Placebo based on the number of patients with a baseline value and at least one post-treatment value. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 3.0. | ||||
| Abbreviations: ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; N = number of patients; pNET = pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. | ||||
| a Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities in patients on sunitinib malate included creatinine (4%), lipase (4%), glucose decreased (2%), glucose increased (2%), neutrophils (2%), ALT (1%), AST (1%), platelets (1%), potassium increased (1%), and total bilirubin (1%). | ||||
| b Grade 4 laboratory abnormalities in patients on placebo included creatinine (3%), alkaline phosphatase (1%), glucose increased (1%), and lipase (1%). | ||||
Warnings & Cautions for Sunitinib
Hepatotoxicity
Sunitinib malate can cause severe hepatotoxicity, resulting in liver failure or death. In the pooled safety population, liver failure occurred in <1% of patients in clinical trials. Liver failure include jaundiced, elevated transaminases and/or hyperbilirubinemia in conjunction with encephalopathy, coagulopathy, and/or renal failure.
Monitor liver function tests (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin) at baseline, during each cycle, and as clinically indicated. Interrupt sunitinib malate for Grade 3 hepatotoxicity until resolution to Grade ≤1 or baseline, then resume sunitinib malate at a reduced dose. Discontinue sunitinib malate in patients with Grade 4 hepatotoxicity, in patients without resolution of Grade 3 hepatotoxicity, in patients who subsequently experience severe changes in liver function tests and in patients who have other signs and symptoms of liver failure.
Safety in patients with ALT or AST >2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or with >5 x ULN and liver metastases has not been established.
Cardiovascular Events
Cardiovascular events, including heart failure, cardiomyopathy, myocardial ischemia, and myocardial infarction, some of which were fatal, have been reported. In pooled safety population, 3% of patients experienced heart failure; 71% of the patients with heart failure were reported as recovered. Fatal cardiac failure was reported in <1% of patients.
In 3 of these 11 patients, the ejection fractions arm did not return to ≥50% or baseline by the time of last measurement. No patients who received sunitinib malate were diagnosed with CHF. Patients who presented with cardiac events within 12 months prior to sunitinib malate administration, such as myocardial infarction (including severe/unstable angina), coronary/peripheral artery bypass graft, symptomatic CHF, cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack, or pulmonary embolism were excluded from sunitinib malate clinical studies.
Patients with prior anthracycline use or cardiac radiation were also excluded from some studies. It is unknown whether patients with these concomitant conditions may be at a higher risk of developing left ventricular dysfunction. Consider monitoring LVEF at baseline and periodically as clinically indicated.
Carefully monitor patients for clinical signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure (CHF). Discontinue sunitinib malate in patients who experience clinical manifestations of CHF. Interrupt sunitinib malate and/or reduce the dose in patients without clinical evidence of CHF who have an ejection fraction of greater than 20% but less than 50% below baseline or below the lower limit of normal if baseline ejection fraction was not obtained.
QT Interval Prolongation and Torsade de Pointes Sunitinib malate can cause QT interval prolongation in a dose-dependent manner, which may lead to an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmias including Torsade de Pointes. Torsade de Pointes was observed in <0.1% of patients. Monitor patients who are at higher risk of developing QT interval prolongation, including patients with a history of QT interval prolongation, patients who are taking antiarrhythmics, or patients with relevant pre-existing cardiac disease, bradycardia, or electrolyte disturbances.
Consider periodic monitoring of electrocardiograms and electrolytes (i.e., magnesium, potassium) during treatment with sunitinib malate. Monitor QT interval more frequently when sunitinib malate is concomitantly administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors or drugs known to prolong QT interval. Consider dose reducing sunitinib malate.
Hypertension In the pooled safety population, 29% of patients experienced hypertension. Monitor blood pressure at baseline and as clinically indicated. Initiate and/or adjust antihypertensive therapy as appropriate.
In cases of Grade 3 hypertension, withhold sunitinib malate until resolution to Grade ≤1 or baseline, then resume sunitinib malate at a reduced dose. Discontinue sunitinib malate in patients with who develop Grade 4 hypertension.
Hemorrhagic Events and Viscus Perforation
Hemorrhagic events, some of which were fatal, have involved the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory tract, tumor, urinary tract, and brain. Epistaxis was the most common hemorrhagic event and gastrointestinal hemorrhage was the most common Grade 3 to 5 event. Tumor-related hemorrhage was observed in patients treated with sunitinib malate.
These events may occur suddenly, and in the case of pulmonary tumors, may present as severe and life‑threatening hemoptysis or pulmonary hemorrhage. Pulmonary hemorrhage, some with a fatal outcome, was observed in patients treated with sunitinib malate for metastatic RCC, GIST, and metastatic lung cancer. Sunitinib malate is not approved for use in patients with lung cancer.
Serious, sometimes fatal, gastrointestinal complications including gastrointestinal perforation, have been reported in patients with intra‑abdominal malignancies treated with sunitinib malate. Include serial complete blood counts (CBCs) and physical examinations with the clinical assessment of hemorrhagic events. Discontinue sunitinib malate in patients without resolution of Grade 3 or 4 hemorrhagic events.
Tumor Lysis Syndrome Tumor Lysis Syndrome
(TLS), some fatal, occurred in clinical trials and has been reported in postmarketing experience, primarily in patients with RCC or GIST. Patients generally at risk of TLS are those with high tumor burden prior to treatment. Monitor these patients for TLS and manage as appropriate.
Thrombotic Microangiopathy Thrombotic Microangiopathy
(TMA), including thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and hemolytic uremic syndrome, sometimes leading to renal failure or a fatal outcome, occurred in clinical trials and in postmarketing experience of sunitinib malate as monotherapy and administered in combination with bevacizumab. Sunitinib malate is not approved for use in combination with bevacizumab. Discontinue sunitinib malate in patients developing TMA.
Reversal of the effects of TMA has been observed after sunitinib malate was discontinued.
Proteinuria Proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome have been reported. Some of these cases have resulted in renal failure and fatal outcomes. Monitor patients for the development or worsening of proteinuria.
Perform baseline and periodic urinalyses during treatment, with follow up measurement of 24-hour urine protein as clinically indicated. Interrupt sunitinib malate and dose reduce for 24-hour urine protein of 3 or more grams. Discontinue sunitinib malate for patients with nephrotic syndrome or repeat episodes of 24-hour urine protein of 3 or more grams despite dose reductions.
The safety of continued sunitinib malate treatment in patients with moderate to severe proteinuria has not been evaluated.
Dermatologic Toxicities
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions have been reported, including erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), some of which were fatal. Permanently discontinue sunitinib malate for these severe cutaneous adverse reactions. Necrotizing fasciitis, including fatal cases, has been reported in patients treated with sunitinib malate, including of the perineum and secondary to fistula formation.
Discontinue sunitinib malate in patients who develop necrotizing fasciitis.
Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome
Reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) has been reported in <1% of patients, some of which were fatal. Patients can present with hypertension, headache, decreased alertness, altered mental functioning, and visual loss, including cortical blindness. Magnetic resonance imaging is necessary to confirm the diagnosis.
Discontinue sunitinib malate in patients developing RPLS.
Thyroid Dysfunction
Hyperthyroidism, some followed by hypothyroidism, have been reported in clinical trials and through postmarketing experience of sunitinib malate. Monitor thyroid function at baseline, periodically during treatment and as clinically indicated. Monitor patients closely for signs and symptoms of thyroid dysfunction, including hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, and thyroiditis, during treatment with sunitinib malate.
Initiate and/or adjust therapies for thyroid dysfunction as appropriate.
Hypoglycemia
Sunitinib malate can result in symptomatic hypoglycemia, which may lead to loss of consciousness, or require hospitalization. In the pooled safety population, hypoglycemia occurred in 2% of the patients treated with sunitinib malate. For patients being treated with sunitinib malate for pNET, pre-existing abnormalities in glucose homeostasis were not present in all patients who experienced hypoglycemia.
Reductions in blood glucose levels may be worse in patients with diabetes. Check blood glucose levels at baseline, regularly during treatment, as clinically indicated and after discontinuation of sunitinib malate. In patients with diabetes, assess if antidiabetic therapies need to be adjusted to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia.
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
(ONJ) occurred in patients treated with sunitinib malate. Concomitant exposure to other risk factors, such as bisphosphonates or dental disease/invasive dental procedures, may increase the risk of ONJ. Perform an oral examination prior to initiation of sunitinib malate and periodically during sunitinib malate therapy.
Advise patients regarding good oral hygiene practices. Withhold sunitinib malate treatment for at least 3 weeks prior to scheduled dental surgery or invasive dental procedures, if possible. Withhold sunitinib malate for development of ONJ until complete resolution.
The safety of resumption of sunitinib malate after resolution of osteonecrosis of the jaw has not been established.
Impaired Wound Healing
Impaired wound healing has been reported in patients who received sunitinib malate. Do not administer for at least 2 weeks following major surgery and until adequate wound healing. The safety of resumption of sunitinib malate after resolution of wound healing complications has not been established.
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Based on findings from animal studies and its mechanism of action, sunitinib malate can cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant woman. Administration of sunitinib to pregnant rats and rabbits during the period of organogenesis resulted in teratogenicity at approximately 5.5 times and 0.3 times the combined systemic exposure in patients administered the recommended daily dose (RDD) of 50 mg, respectively. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.
Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with sunitinib malate and for 4 weeks following the final dose.
Drug Interactions with Sunitinib
Effect of Other Drugs on Sunitinib Malate Strong CYP3A4 Inhibitors Co-administration with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors may increase sunitinib plasma concentrations. Select an alternate concomitant medication with no or minimal enzyme inhibition potential. Consider a dose reduction for sunitinib malate when it is co‑administered with strong CYP3A4 inhibitors.
Strong CYP3A4 Inducers Co-administration with strong CYP3A4 inducers may decrease sunitinib plasma concentrations. Consider a dose increase for sunitinib malate when it must be co‑administered with CYP3A4 inducers.
Drugs that Prolong QT Interval
Sunitinib malate is associated with QTc interval prolongation. Monitor the QT interval with ECGs more frequently in patients who require treatment with concomitant medications known to prolong the QT interval.
Pregnancy Safety for Sunitinib
Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on animal reproduction studies and its mechanism of action, sunitinib malate can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. There are no available data in pregnant women to inform a drug-associated risk. In animal developmental and reproductive toxicology studies, oral administration of sunitinib to pregnant rats and rabbits throughout organogenesis resulted in teratogenicity (embryolethality, craniofacial and skeletal malformations) at 5.5 times and 0.3 times the combined AUC (the combined systemic exposure of sunitinib plus its active metabolite) in patients administered the recommended daily doses (RDD) of 50 mg, respectively (see Data).
Advise females of reproductive potential of the potential risk to a fetus. The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations are unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes.
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriages in clinically recognized pregnancies is respectively. Embryolethality was observed at 5 mg/kg/day (approximately 5 times the combined AUC in patients administered the RDD of 50 mg). No adverse fetal effects were observed in rats at doses ≤3 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times the combined AUC in patients administered the RDD of 50 mg).
Sunitinib (0.3 mg/kg/day, 1 mg/kg/day, 3 mg/kg/day) was evaluated in a pre- and postnatal development study in pregnant rats. Maternal body weight gains were reduced during gestation and lactation at doses ≥1 mg/kg/day (approximately 0.5 times the combined AUC in patients administered the RDD of 50 mg). At 3 mg/kg/day (approximately 2 times the combined AUC in patients administered the RDD of 50 mg), reduced neonate body weights were observed at birth and persisted in the offspring of both sexes during the preweaning period and in males during postweaning period.
No adverse developmental effects were observed at doses ≤1 mg/kg/day.
Pediatric Use of Sunitinib
Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of sunitinib malate in pediatric patients have not been established. Safety and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib were assessed in an open-label study (NCT00387920) in pediatric patients 2 years to <17 years of age (n = 29) with refractory solid tumors. In addition, efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of sunitinib was assessed in another open-label study (NCT01462695) in pediatric patients 2 years to <17 years of age (n = 27) with high-grade glioma or ependymoma.
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) normalized for body surface area (BSA) was lower in pediatric patients compared to adults. Sunitinib was poorly tolerated in pediatric patients. The occurrence of dose-limiting cardiotoxicity prompted an amendment of the NCT00387920 study to exclude patients with previous exposure to anthracyclines or cardiac radiation.
No responses were reported in patients in either of the trials. Apparent clearance and volume of distribution normalized for BSA for sunitinib and its active major metabolite were lower in pediatrics as compared to adults. The effect on open tibial growth plates in pediatric patients who received sunitinib malate has not been adequately studied.
See Juvenile Animal Toxicity Data below. The no-effect level (NOEL) was 1.5 mg/kg/day in monkeys treated intermittently for 8 cycles, but was not identified in monkeys treated continuously for 3 months. Additionally, tooth caries were present in rats at >5 mg/kg.
The incidence and severity of physeal dysplasia were dose related and reversible upon cessation of treatment; however, findings in the teeth were not. In rats, the NOEL in bones was ≤2 mg/kg/day.
Overdosage Information for Sunitinib
Treatment of overdose with sunitinib malate should consist of general supportive measures. There is no specific antidote for overdosage with sunitinib malate. If indicated, elimination of unabsorbed drug should be achieved by emesis or gastric lavage.
Cases of accidental overdose have been reported; these cases were associated with adverse reactions consistent with the known safety profile of sunitinib malate, or without adverse reactions. At this dose, signs of toxicity included impaired muscle coordination, head shakes, hypoactivity, ocular discharge, piloerection, and gastrointestinal distress. Mortality and similar signs of toxicity were observed at lower doses when administered for longer durations.
Clinical Studies of Sunitinib
Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Study 1 Study 1 (NCT#00075218) was a 2-arm, international, randomized, double‑blind, placebo‑controlled trial of sunitinib malate in patients with GIST who had disease progression during prior imatinib mesylate (imatinib) treatment or who were intolerant of imatinib. The objective was to compare time-to-tumor progression (TTP) in patients receiving sunitinib malate plus best supportive care versus patients receiving placebo plus best supportive care. Other objectives included progression‑free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS).
Patients were randomized (2:1) to receive either 50 mg sunitinib malate or placebo orally, once daily, on Schedule 4/2 until disease progression or withdrawal from the study for another reason. Treatment was unblinded at the time of disease progression. Patients randomized to placebo were then offered crossover to open-label sunitinib malate and patients randomized to sunitinib malate were permitted to continue treatment per investigator judgment.
At the time of a prespecified interim analysis, the intent-to-treat (ITT) population included 312 patients. Two hundred seven patients were randomized to the sunitinib malate arm and 105 patients were randomized to the placebo arm. The planned interim efficacy and safety analysis was performed after 149 TTP events had occurred.
There was a statistically significant advantage for sunitinib malate over placebo in TTP, meeting the primary endpoint. Efficacy results are summarized in Table 10 and the Kaplan-Meier curve for TTP is shown in Figure 1. Table 10.
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; HR = hazard ratio; N = number of patients; PR = partial response. Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Curve of TTP in GIST Study 1 (Intent-to-Treat Population) Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GIST = gastrointestinal stromal tumor; N = number of patients; TTP = time-to-tumor progression.
The final ITT population enrolled in the double-blind treatment phase of the study included 243 patients randomized to the sunitinib malate arm and 118 patients randomized to the placebo arm. After the primary endpoint was met at the interim analysis, the study was unblinded, and patients on the placebo arm were offered open-label sunitinib malate treatment. Ninety-nine of the patients initially randomized to placebo crossed over to receive sunitinib malate in the open‑label treatment phase.
At the protocol specified final analysis of OS, the median OS was 72.7 weeks for the sunitinib malate arm and 64.9 weeks for the placebo arm. Study 2 Study 2 was an open-label, multi-center, single-arm, dose-escalation study conducted in patients with GIST following progression on, or intolerance to imatinib. The objective was to compare PFS in patients receiving sunitinib malate versus patients receiving interferon alfa.
Other endpoints included ORR, OS, and safety. The ITT population included 750 patients, 375 randomized to sunitinib malate and 375 randomized to interferon alfa. Prior treatment included nephrectomy (91% versus 89%) and radiotherapy (14% each arm).
There was a statistically significant advantage for sunitinib malate over interferon alfa in the endpoint of PFS (see Table 11 and Figure 2). In the prespecified stratification factors of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (>1.5 ULN versus ≤1.5 ULN), ECOG performance status (0 versus 1), and prior nephrectomy (yes versus no), the hazard ratio favored sunitinib malate over interferon alfa. The ORR was higher in the sunitinib malate arm (see Table 11).
Table 11. Treatment-Naïve RCC Efficacy Results (Interim Analysis) from Study 3 Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Curve of PFS in Treatment-Naïve RCC Study 3 (Intent-to-Treat Population) Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; IFN-α = interferon-alfa; N = number of patients; PFS = progression-free survival; RCC = renal cell carcinoma.
At the protocol-specified final analysis of OS, the median OS was 114.6 weeks for the sunitinib malate arm and 94.9 weeks for the interferon alfa arm HR = The median OS for the interferon alfa arm includes 25 patients who discontinued interferon alfa treatment because of disease progression and crossed over to treatment with sunitinib malate as well as 121 patients (32%) on the interferon alfa arm who received post-study cancer treatment with sunitinib malate. Cytokine-Refractory The use of single-agent sunitinib malate in the treatment of cytokine-refractory RCC was investigated in 2 single-arm, multi-center studies. All patients enrolled into these studies experienced failure of prior cytokine-based therapy.
In Study 4 (NCT#00077974), failure of prior cytokine therapy was based on radiographic evidence of disease progression defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) or World Health Organization (WHO) criteria during or within 9 months of completion of 1 cytokine therapy treatment (interferon alfa, interleukin-2, or interferon alfa plus interleukin-2; patients who were treated with interferon alfa alone must have received treatment for at least 28 days). In Study 5 (NCT#00054886), failure of prior cytokine therapy was defined as disease progression or unacceptable treatment-related toxicity. The endpoint for both studies was ORR.
Duration of response (DR) was also evaluated. One hundred and six patients were enrolled into Study 4 and 63 patients were enrolled into Study 5. Therapy was continued until the patients met withdrawal criteria or had progressive disease.
The baseline age, sex, race, and ECOG performance statuses of the patients were comparable between Studies 4 and 5. Approximately 86% to 94% of patients in the 2 studies were White. Men comprised 65% of the pooled population.
The median age was 57 years and ranged from 24 years to 87 years in the studies. All patients had an ECOG performance status <2 at the screening visit. The baseline malignancy and prior treatment history of the patients were comparable between Studies 4 and 5.
Across the 2 studies, 95% of the pooled population of patients had at least some component of clear-cell histology. All patients in Study 4 were required to have a histological clear-cell component. Most patients enrolled in the studies (97% of the pooled population) had undergone nephrectomy; prior nephrectomy was required for patients enrolled in Study 4.
All patients had received 1 previous cytokine regimen. Metastatic disease present at the time of study entry included lung metastases in 81% of patients. Patients with known brain metastases or leptomeningeal disease were excluded from both studies.
The ORR and DR data from Studies 4 and 5 are provided in Table 12. There were 36 PRs in Study 4 as assessed by a core radiology laboratory for an ORR of There were 23 PRs in Study 5 as assessed by the investigators for an ORR of The majority (>90%) of objective disease responses were observed during the first 4 cycles; the latest reported response was observed in Cycle 10. Table 12.
Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; N = number of patients; NR = not reached; RCC = renal cell carcinoma. a Assessed by blinded core radiology laboratory. b Assessed by investigators. Adjuvant Treatment In the adjuvant treatment setting, sunitinib malate was investigated in S-TRAC (NCT#00375674), a multi-center, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, trial in patients with high risk of recurrent RCC following nephrectomy. Patients were required to have clear cell histology and high risk of recurrence defined as ≥T3 and/or N+ tumors.
Six hundred fifteen patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either 50 mg sunitinib malate once daily on Schedule 4/2 or placebo. Patients were treated for 9 cycles (approximately 1 year), or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. At randomization, most patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (74% sunitinib malate and 72% placebo).
The remainder of the patients had an ECOG performance status of 1; 1 patient on sunitinib malate had a performance status of 2. The major efficacy outcome measure was disease-free survival (DFS) in patients receiving sunitinib malate versus placebo as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). Overall survival was an additional endpoint.
There was a statistically significant improvement in DFS in patients who were treated with sunitinib malate compared to placebo (Table 13 and Figure 3). Prespecified subgroup analyses are presented in Table 14. At the time of the DFS analysis, overall survival data were not mature, with 141/615 (23%) patient deaths.
Table 13. Disease-free Survival Results as Assessed by BICR in Adjuvant RCC (Intent to Treat Population) from S-TRAC Table 14. Disease-free Survival by Baseline Disease Characteristics Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier Curve of Disease-free Survival as Assessed by BICR (Intent-to-Treat Population) Abbreviations: BICR = blinded independent central review; CI = confidence interval; N = number of patients. image description image description
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Study 6 (NCT#00428597) was a multi-center, international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of single-agent sunitinib malate conducted in patients with unresectable pNET. The primary objective was to compare PFS in patients receiving sunitinib malate versus patients receiving placebo. Use of somatostatin analogs was allowed in the study.
Demographics were comparable between the sunitinib malate and placebo groups. Additionally, 49% of sunitinib malate patients had nonfunctioning tumors vs 52% of placebo patients, and 92% patients in both arms had liver metastases. A total of 66% of sunitinib malate patients received prior systemic therapy compared with 72% of placebo patients and 35% of sunitinib malate patients had received somatostatin analogs compared with 38% of placebo patients.
Upon disease progression or study closure, patients were offered access to sunitinib malate in a separate extension study. As recommended by the Independent Data Monitoring Committee, the study was terminated prematurely prior to the prespecified interim analysis. This may have led to an overestimate of the magnitude of PFS effect.
A clinically significant improvement for sunitinib malate over placebo in PFS was seen by both investigator and independent assessment. A hazard ratio favoring sunitinib malate was observed in all subgroups of baseline characteristics evaluated. There were 9 deaths in the sunitinib malate arm and 21 deaths in the placebo arm.
A statistically significant difference in ORR favoring sunitinib malate over placebo was observed. Efficacy results are summarized in Table 15 and the Kaplan-Meier curve for PFS is in Figure 4. Table 15. pNET Efficacy Results from Study 6 Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier Curve of PFS in the pNET Study 6 Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; N = number of patients; PFS = progression-free survival; pNET = pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. image description
| Efficacy Parameter | Sunitinib Malate (N = 207) | Placebo (N = 105) | p-value (log-rank test) | HR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time-to-tumor progression Time from randomization to progression; deaths prior to documented progression were censored at time of last radiographic evaluation. [median, weeks (95% CI)] | 27.3 (16.0, 32.1) | 6.4 (4.4, 10.0) | <0.0001 A comparison is considered statistically significant if the p-value is <0.00417 (O'Brien Fleming stopping boundary). | 0.33 (0.23, 0.47) |
| Progression-free survival Time from randomization to progression or death due to any cause. [median, weeks (95% CI)] | 24.1 (11.1, 28.3) | 6.0 (4.4, 9.9) | <0.0001 | 0.33 (0.24, 0.47) |
| Objective response rate (PR) [%, (95% CI)] | 6.8 (3.7, 11.1) | 0 | 0.006 Pearson chi-square test. |
| Efficacy Parameter | Sunitinib Malate (N = 375) | Interferon Alfa (N = 375) | p-value (log-rank test) | HR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free survival a | 47.3 | 22.0 | <0.000001 b | 0.415 |
| [median, weeks (95% CI)] | (42.6, 50.7) | (16.4, 24.0) | (0.320, 0.539) | |
| Objective response rate a | 27.5 | 5.3 | <0.001 c | NA |
| [%, (95% CI)] | (23.0, 32.3) | (3.3, 8.1) | ||
| Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; N = number of patients; NA = not applicable; RCC = renal cell carcinoma. | ||||
| a Assessed by blinded core radiology laboratory; 90 patients’ scans had not been read at time of analysis. | ||||
| b A comparison is considered statistically significant if the p-value is <0.0042 (O’Brien Fleming stopping boundary). | ||||
| c Pearson chi-square test. | ||||
| Efficacy Parameter | Study 4 (N = 106) | Study 5 (N = 63) |
|---|---|---|
| Objective response rate [%, (95% CI)] | 34.0 a (25.0, 43.8) | 36.5 b (24.7, 49.6) |
| Duration of response [median, weeks (95% CI)] | NR (42.0, ) | 54 b (34.3, 70.1) |
| Data not mature enough to determine upper confidence limit. | ||
| Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; N = number of patients; NR = not reached; RCC = renal cell carcinoma. | ||
| a Assessed by blinded core radiology laboratory. | ||
| b Assessed by investigators. | ||
| Sunitinib Malate N = 309 | Placebo N = 306 | p-value a | HR a (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median DFS [years (95% CI)] | 6.8 (5.8, NR) | 5.6 (3.8, 6.6) | 0.03 | 0.76 (0.59, 0.98) |
| DFS Events | 113 (36.6%) | 144 (47.1%) | ||
| 5 Year DFS Rate | 59.3% | 51.3% | ||
| a P-value based on log-rank test stratified by University of California Los Angeles Integrated Staging System (UISS) prognostic group; HR based on a Cox proportional hazard model stratified by UISS prognostic group | ||||
| Abbreviations: BICR = blinded independent central review; CI = confidence interval; DFS = disease-free survival; HR = hazard ratio; N = number of patients; RCC = renal cell carcinoma. | ||||
| Number of Events/ Total n/N | Median DFS [years (95% CI)] | HR a (95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sunitinib Malate | Placebo | Sunitinib Malate | Placebo | ||
| T3 Intermediate b | 35/115 | 46/112 | NR (5.2, NR) | 6.4 (4.7, NR) | 0.82 (0.53, 1.28) |
| T3 High c | 63/165 | 79/166 | 6.8 (5.0, NR) | 5.3 (2.9, NR) | 0.77 (0.55, 1.07) |
| T4/Node Positive d | 15/29 | 19/28 | 3.5 (1.2, NR) | 1.7 (0.4, 3.0) | 0.62 (0.31, 1.23) |
| Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DFS = disease-free survival; HR = hazard ratio; N = number of patients; n = number of events; NR = not reached | |||||
| a HR based on a Cox proportional hazards model | |||||
| b T3 Intermediate: T3, N0 or NX, M0, any Fuhrman’s grade, ECOG PS 0 OR T3, N0 or NX, M0, Fuhrman’s grade 1, ECOG PS ≥ 1 | |||||
| c T3 High: T3, N0 or NX, M0, Fuhrman’s grade ≥ 2, ECOG PS ≥ 1 | |||||
| d T4/Node Positive: T4, N0 or NX, M0, any Fuhrman’s grade, any ECOG PS OR Any T, N1-2, M0, any Fuhrman’s grade, any ECOG PS | |||||
| Efficacy Parameter | Sunitinib Malate (N = 86) | Placebo (N = 85) | p-value | HR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Progression-free survival [median, months (95% CI)] | 10.2 (7.4, 16.9) | 5.4 (3.4, 6.0) | 0.000146 a | 0.427 (0.271, 0.673) |
| Objective response rate [%, (95% CI)] | 9.3 (3.2, 15.4) | 0 | 0.0066 b | NA |
| Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; N = number of patients; NA = not applicable; pNET = pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. | ||||
| a 2-sided unstratified log-rank test. | ||||
| b Fisher’s Exact test. | ||||
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Sunitinib?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Sunitinib Prices