Saxenda Drug Information

Generic name: LIRAGLUTIDE

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist [EPC]

Save on Saxenda at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Saxenda

  • SAXENDA is indicated in combination with a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity to reduce excess body weight and maintain weight reduction long term in:
  • Adults and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with body weight greater than 60 kg and obesity.
  • Adults with overweight in the presence of at least one weight-related comorbid condition. Limitations of Use
  • SAXENDA contains liraglutide. Coadministration with other liraglutide-containing products or with any other glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist is not recommended.
  • The safety and effectiveness of SAXENDA in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes have not been established. SAXENDA is a glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist indicated in combination with a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity to reduce excess body weight and maintain weight reduction long term in:
  • Coadministration with other liraglutide-containing products or with any other GLP-1 receptor agonist is not recommended.
  • The safety and effectiveness of SAXENDA in pediatric patients with type 2 diabetes have not been established.

Dosage & Administration of Saxenda

Important Administration Instructions • Prior to initiation of SAXENDA, train patients on proper injection technique. Refer to the accompanying Instructions for Use for complete administration instructions with illustrations. • Inspect SAXENDA visually prior to each injection. Only use if solution is clear, colorless, and contains no particles. • Administer SAXENDA in combination with a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity. • Inject SAXENDA subcutaneously once daily at any time of day, without regard to the timing of meals. • Inject SAXENDA subcutaneously in the abdomen, thigh, or upper arm.

No dosage adjustment is needed if changing the injection site and/or timing. • Rotate injection sites within the same region in order to reduce the risk of cutaneous amyloidosis. • If a dose is missed, resume the once-daily regimen as prescribed with the next scheduled dose. Do not administer an extra dose or increase the dose to make up for the missed dose. • If more than 3 days have elapsed since the last SAXENDA dosage, reinitiate SAXENDA at 0.6 mg daily and follow the dosage escalation schedule in Table 1, to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions associated with reinitiation of treatment.

Dosage in Adults and Pediatric Patients Aged 12 Years and Older • Initiate SAXENDA with a dose of 0.6 mg daily for one week. Table 1. Dosage Escalation Schedule Week Daily Dose and onward 3 mg Adult Patients • For adults, the recommended dosage of SAXENDA is 3 mg daily, lower dosages are for titration only. • Discontinue SAXENDA if the patient cannot tolerate the 3 mg dosage. • If patients do not tolerate an increased dose during dosage escalation, consider delaying dosage escalation for approximately one additional week. • Evaluate the change in body weight 16 weeks after initiating SAXENDA and discontinue SAXENDA if the patient has not lost at least 4% of baseline body weight, since it is unlikely that the patient will achieve and sustain clinically meaningful weight loss with continued treatment. • In adult patients with type 2 diabetes, monitor blood glucose prior to starting SAXENDA and during SAXENDA treatment.

Pediatric Patients • For pediatric patients, the recommended maintenance dosage of SAXENDA is 3 mg daily. Pediatric patients who do not tolerate 3 mg daily may have their maintenance dose reduced to 2.4 mg daily. Discontinue SAXENDA if the patient cannot tolerate the 2.4 mg dose. • If pediatric patients do not tolerate an increased dose during dosage escalation, the dose may also be lowered to the previous level.

Dosage escalation for pediatric patients may take up to 8 weeks. • Evaluate the change in BMI after 12 weeks on the maintenance dose and discontinue SAXENDA if the patient has not had a reduction in BMI of at least 1% from baseline, since it is unlikely that the patient will achieve and sustain clinically meaningful weight loss with continued treatment.

WeekDaily Dose
10.6 mg
21.2 mg
31.8 mg
42.4 mg
5 and onward3 mg

Side Effects of Saxenda

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical studies of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. All patients received study drug in addition to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity counseling. In the adult trials, patients received SAXENDA for a mean treatment duration of 46 weeks (median, 56 weeks).

In one of the 56-week trials, a subset of patients (with abnormal glucose measurements at randomization) were enrolled for a placebo-controlled 160-week period instead, followed by a 12-week off-treatment follow-up. For those participating in this 160-week period, patients received SAXENDA for a mean treatment duration of 110 weeks (median, 159 weeks). For all trials, dosing was initiated and increased weekly to reach the 3 mg dose.

In adult clinical trials, 9.8% of patients treated with SAXENDA and 4.3% of patients treated with placebo prematurely discontinued treatment as a result of adverse reactions. Adverse reactions reported in greater than or equal to 2% of SAXENDA-treated adult patients and more frequently than in placebo-treated patients are shown in Table 2. Table 2.

See text below for further information regarding hypoglycemia in patients with and without type 2 diabetes. T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus. Table 3.

Pediatric patients did not have type 2 diabetes mellitus. See text below for more detailed hypoglycemia information. Hypoglycemia Adult Patients with Type 2 Diabetes In a clinical trial in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and overweight (excess weight) or obesity, severe hypoglycemia (defined as requiring the assistance of another person) occurred in 3 (0.7%) of 422 SAXENDA-treated patients (all taking a sulfonylurea) and in none of the 212 placebo-treated patients.

The doses of sulfonylureas were reduced by 50% at the beginning of the trial per protocol. No meaningful difference in hypoglycemia, defined as blood glucose less than 54 mg/dL with or without symptoms, was reported between groups. Adult Patients without Type 2 Diabetes In SAXENDA clinical trials in adult patients without type 2 diabetes mellitus, there was no systematic capturing or reporting of hypoglycemia; patients were not provided with blood glucose meters or hypoglycemia diaries.

No severe hypoglycemic episodes, defined as requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions, occurred in the SAXENDA treatment group. In addition, there were 2 cases of acute pancreatitis in SAXENDA-treated patients who prematurely withdrew from these clinical trials, occurring 74 and 124 days after the last dose. In a SAXENDA pediatric clinical trial, pancreatitis was not independently adjudicated.

Pancreatitis was reported in 1 (0.8%) SAXENDA-treated patient and resulted in treatment discontinuation. Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions In the adult clinical trials, approximately 68% of SAXENDA-treated patients and 39% of placebo-treated patients reported gastrointestinal disorders; the most frequently reported was nausea (39% and 14% of patients treated with SAXENDA and placebo, respectively). Severe gastrointestinal adverse reactions were reported more frequently among patients receiving SAXENDA (4.8%) than placebo (1.4 %).

There have been reports of gastrointestinal adverse reactions, such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, associated with volume depletion and renal impairment. Most episodes of gastrointestinal events were mild or moderate and did not lead to discontinuation of therapy (6.2% with SAXENDA versus 0.8% with placebo discontinued treatment as a result of gastrointestinal adverse reactions). The percentage of patients reporting nausea declined as treatment continued.

Other common adverse reactions that occurred at a higher incidence among SAXENDA-treated patients included diarrhea, constipation, vomiting, dyspepsia, abdominal pain, dry mouth, gastritis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, flatulence, eructation and abdominal distension. In a pediatric clinical trial, 8% of patients treated with SAXENDA versus no patients who received placebo discontinued treatment as a result of gastrointestinal adverse reactions. Most adverse reactions leading to discontinuation were due to vomiting and nausea (4.8% and 3.2% of SAXENDA-treated patients, respectively).

Cardiovascular Safety Cardiovascular safety was assessed (LEADER, NCT01179048) in 9,340 patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease randomized to liraglutide 1.8 mg or placebo in addition to standard of care treatments for type 2 diabetes for a median duration of 3.5 years. The primary endpoint was the time from randomization to first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) defined as: cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. No increased risk for MACE was observed with liraglutide 1.8 mg.

The total number of primary component MACE endpoints was 1,302. Liraglutide 1.8 mg (Victoza) is used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults. The efficacy of liraglutide at doses below 3 mg daily has not been established for weight reduction.

Asthenia, Fatigue, Malaise, Dysgeusia and Dizziness Events of asthenia, fatigue, malaise, dysgeusia and dizziness were mainly reported within the first 12 weeks of treatment with SAXENDA and were often co-reported with gastrointestinal events such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Immunogenicity The detection of antibody formation is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Additionally, the observed incidence of antibody (including neutralizing antibody) positivity in an assay may be influenced by several factors including assay methodology, sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease.

For these reasons, the incidence of antibodies to SAXENDA cannot be directly compared with the incidence of antibodies of other products. Patients treated with SAXENDA may develop anti-liraglutide antibodies. Anti-liraglutide antibodies were detected in 42 (2.8%) of 1505 SAXENDA-treated adult patients with a post-baseline assessment.

Antibodies that had a neutralizing effect on liraglutide in an in vitro assay occurred in 18 (1.2%) of 1505 SAXENDA-treated patients. Presence of antibodies may be associated with a higher incidence of injection site reactions and reports of low blood glucose. In clinical trials, these events were usually classified as mild and resolved while patients continued on treatment.

Two patients (1.7%) remained positive throughout the follow-up period; 1 (0.9%) had antibodies cross reactive to native GLP-1. No patients had neutralizing antibodies. Allergic Reactions Urticaria was reported in 0.7% of SAXENDA-treated patients and 0.5% of placebo-treated patients.

Anaphylactic reactions, asthma, bronchial hyperreactivity, bronchospasm, oropharyngeal swelling, facial swelling, angioedema, pharyngeal edema, type IV hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in patients treated with liraglutide in clinical trials. Cases of anaphylactic reactions with additional symptoms such as hypotension, palpitations, dyspnea, and edema have been reported with marketed use of liraglutide. Anaphylactic reactions may potentially be life-threatening.

The majority of cancers were estrogen- and progesterone-receptor positive. There were too few cases to determine whether these cases were related to SAXENDA. In addition, there are insufficient data to determine whether SAXENDA has an effect on pre-existing breast neoplasia.

Four of these papillary thyroid carcinomas were less than 1 cm in greatest diameter and 4 were diagnosed in surgical pathology specimens after thyroidectomy prompted by findings identified prior to treatment. Cardiac Conduction Disorders In SAXENDA clinical trials in adults, 11 (0.3%) of 3,384 SAXENDA-treated patients compared with none of the 1,941 placebo-treated patients had a cardiac conduction disorder, reported as first degree atrioventricular block, right bundle branch block, or left bundle branch block. Hypotension Adverse reactions related to hypotension (hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, circulatory collapse, and decreased blood pressure) were reported more frequently with SAXENDA (1.1%) compared with placebo (0.5%) in SAXENDA clinical trials in adults.

Systolic blood pressure decreases to less than 80 mmHg were observed in 4 (0.1%) SAXENDA-treated patients compared with no placebo-treated patients. One of the SAXENDA-treated patients had hypotension associated with gastrointestinal adverse reactions and renal failure. Because clinical evaluation to exclude alternative causes of ALT and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increases was not done in most cases, the relationship to SAXENDA is uncertain.

Some increases in ALT and AST were associated with other confounding factors (such as gallstones). Serum Calcitonin Calcitonin, a biological marker of MTC, was measured throughout the clinical development program. More patients treated with SAXENDA in the clinical trials were observed to have high calcitonin values during treatment, compared with placebo.

The proportion of patients with calcitonin greater than or equal to 2 times the upper limit of normal at the end of the trial was 1.2% in SAXENDA-treated patients and 0.6% in placebo-treated patients. Calcitonin values greater than 20 ng/L at the end of the trial occurred in 0.5% of SAXENDA-treated patients and 0.2% of placebo-treated patients; among patients with pre-treatment serum calcitonin less than 20 ng/L, none had calcitonin elevations to greater than 50 ng/L at the end of the trial. Serum Lipase and Amylase Serum lipase and amylase were routinely measured in the SAXENDA clinical trials.

Among SAXENDA-treated patients, 2.1% had a lipase value at anytime during treatment of greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of normal compared with 1.0% of placebo-treated patients. 0.1% of SAXENDA-treated patients had an amylase value at anytime in the trial of greater than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of normal versus 0.1% of placebo-treated patients. The clinical significance of elevations in lipase or amylase with SAXENDA is unknown in the absence of other signs and symptoms of pancreatitis.

Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been reported during post-approval use of liraglutide, the active ingredient of SAXENDA. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Gastrointestinal Acute pancreatitis; hemorrhagic and necrotizing pancreatitis, sometimes resulting in death; ileus, intestinal obstruction, severe constipation including fecal impaction, nausea, vomiting and diarrhea leading to dehydration Hepatobiliary Hyperbilirubinemia, elevations of liver enzymes, cholestasis and hepatitis Hypersensitivity Rash, pruritus, angioedema and anaphylactic reactions Neoplasms Medullary thyroid carcinoma Neurologic Dysesthesia, headache Pulmonary Pulmonary aspiration has occurred in patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists undergoing elective surgeries or procedures requiring general anesthesia or deep sedation.

Renal Acute kidney injury, sometimes requiring hemodialysis; increased serum creatinine General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions Allergic reactions: rash and pruritus Immune System Angioedema and anaphylactic reactions Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Cutaneous amyloidosis, alopecia

Placebo N=1941 %SAXENDA N=3384 %
Nausea13.839.3
Diarrhea9.920.9
Constipation8.519.4
Vomiting3.915.7
Injection Site Reaction 110.513.9
Headache12.613.6
Hypoglycemia in T2DM 26.612.6
Dyspepsia2.79.6
Fatigue4.67.5
Dizziness56.9
Abdominal Pain3.15.4
Increased Lipase2.25.3
Upper Abdominal Pain2.75.1
Gastroenteritis3.24.7
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease1.74.7
Abdominal Distension34.5
Eructation0.24.5
Urinary Tract Infection3.14.3
Flatulence2.54
Viral Gastroenteritis1.62.8
Insomnia1.72.4
Dry Mouth12.3
Asthenia0.82.1
Anxiety1.62
Placebo N=126 %SAXENDA N=125 %
Nausea14.342.4
Vomiting434.4
Diarrhea14.322.4
Hypoglycemia 1415.2
Gastroenteritis4.812.8
Dizziness3.210.4
Pyrexia7.18
Abdominal discomfort0.84.8
Constipation2.44.8
Dyslipidemia3.24.8
Fatigue3.24.8
Cough3.24
Depression2.44
Dyspepsia2.44
Pain in extremity2.44
Injection site pain3.23.2
Flatulence03.2
Increased Blood Creatine Kinase2.43.2
Increased Lipase0.83.2
Rash03.2

Warnings & Cautions for Saxenda

Risk of Thyroid C-cell Tumors

Liraglutide causes dose-dependent and treatment-duration-dependent thyroid C-cell tumors (adenomas and/or carcinomas) at clinically relevant exposures in both genders of rats and mice. Malignant thyroid C-cell carcinomas were detected in rats and mice. It is unknown whether SAXENDA will cause thyroid C-cell tumors, including medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), in humans, as the human relevance of liraglutide-induced rodent thyroid C-cell tumors has not been determined.

Cases of MTC in patients treated with liraglutide have been reported in the postmarketing period; the data in these reports are insufficient to establish or exclude a causal relationship between MTC and liraglutide use in humans. SAXENDA is contraindicated in patients with a personal or family history of MTC or in patients with MEN 2. Counsel patients regarding the potential risk for MTC with the use of SAXENDA and inform them of symptoms of thyroid tumors (e.g., a mass in the neck, dysphagia, dyspnea, persistent hoarseness).

Routine monitoring of serum calcitonin or using thyroid ultrasound is of uncertain value for early detection of MTC in patients treated with SAXENDA. Such monitoring may increase the risk of unnecessary procedures, due to low test specificity for serum calcitonin and a high background incidence of thyroid disease. Significantly elevated serum calcitonin may indicate MTC, and patients with MTC usually have calcitonin values greater than 50 ng/L.

If serum calcitonin is measured and found to be elevated, the patient should be further evaluated. Patients with thyroid nodules noted on physical examination or neck imaging should also be further evaluated.

Acute Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis, including fatal and non-fatal hemorrhagic or necrotizing pancreatitis, has been observed in patients treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists, including liraglutide. After initiation of SAXENDA, observe patients carefully for signs and symptoms of acute pancreatitis which may include persistent or severe abdominal pain (sometimes radiating to the back) and which may or may not be accompanied by nausea or vomiting. If pancreatitis is suspected, discontinue SAXENDA and initiate appropriate management.

Acute Gallbladder Disease In SAXENDA clinical trials in adults, 2.2% of SAXENDA-treated patients reported adverse events of cholelithiasis versus 0.8% of placebo-treated patients. The incidence of cholecystitis was 0.8% in SAXENDA-treated patients versus 0.4% in placebo-treated patients. The majority of SAXENDA-treated patients with adverse events of cholelithiasis and cholecystitis required cholecystectomy.

Substantial or rapid weight loss can increase the risk of cholelithiasis; however, the incidence of acute gallbladder disease was greater in SAXENDA-treated patients than in placebo-treated patients even after accounting for the degree of weight loss. If cholelithiasis is suspected, gallbladder studies and appropriate clinical follow-up are indicated.

Hypoglycemia

Adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on an insulin secretagogue (e.g., sulfonylurea) or insulin may have an increased risk of hypoglycemia with use of SAXENDA, including severe hypoglycemia. In patients with type 2 diabetes, monitor blood glucose prior to starting SAXENDA and during SAXENDA treatment. The risk of hypoglycemia may be lowered by a reduction in the dose of sulfonylurea (or other concomitantly administered insulin secretagogues) or insulin.

Inform patients using these concomitant medications of the risk of hypoglycemia and educate them on the signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia. In the pediatric clinical trial, patients did not have type 2 diabetes but were provided with blood glucose meters. Clinically significant hypoglycemia, defined as blood glucose <54 mg/dL, occurred in 1.6% of the SAXENDA- treated patients compared to 0.8% of placebo-treated patients.

Inform all pediatric patients of the risk of hypoglycemia and educate them on the signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia.

Heart Rate Increase

Mean increases in resting heart rate of 2 to 3 beats per minute (bpm) were observed with routine clinical monitoring in SAXENDA-treated adult patients compared to placebo in clinical trials. Tachycardia was reported as an adverse reaction in 0.6% of SAXENDA-treated patients and in 0.1% of placebo-treated patients. In a clinical pharmacology trial that monitored heart rate continuously for 24 hours, SAXENDA treatment was associated with a heart rate that was 4 to 9 bpm higher than that observed with placebo.

In a pediatric clinical trial, mean increases from baseline in resting heart rate of 3 to 7 bpm were observed with SAXENDA treatment. Heart rate should be monitored at regular intervals consistent with usual clinical practice. Patients should inform health care providers of palpitations or feelings of a racing heartbeat while at rest during SAXENDA treatment.

For patients who experience a sustained increase in resting heart rate while taking SAXENDA, SAXENDA should be discontinued.

Acute Kidney Injury Due to Volume Depletion There have been postmarketing reports of acute kidney injury, in some cases requiring hemodialysis, in patients treated with liraglutide. The majority of the reported events occurred in patients who had experienced gastrointestinal reactions leading to dehydration such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. Monitor renal function in patients reporting adverse reactions to SAXENDA that could lead to volume depletion, especially during dosage initiation and escalation.

Severe Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions Use of GLP-1 receptor agonists, including liraglutide, has been associated with gastrointestinal adverse reactions, sometimes severe. In SAXENDA clinical trials, severe gastrointestinal adverse reactions were reported more frequently among patients receiving SAXENDA (4.8%) than placebo (1.4%). Severe gastrointestinal adverse reactions have also been reported postmarketing with GLP-1 receptor agonists.

SAXENDA is not recommended in patients with severe gastroparesis.

Hypersensitivity Reactions There have been reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., anaphylactic reactions and angioedema) in patients treated with SAXENDA. If a hypersensitivity reaction occurs, the patient should discontinue SAXENDA and other suspect medications and promptly seek medical advice. Anaphylaxis and angioedema have been reported with other GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Use caution in a patient with a history of anaphylaxis or angioedema with another GLP-1 receptor agonist because it is unknown whether such patients will be predisposed to these reactions with SAXENDA.

Pulmonary Aspiration During General Anesthesia or Deep Sedation SAXENDA delays gastric emptying. There have been rare postmarketing reports of pulmonary aspiration in patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists undergoing elective surgeries or procedures requiring general anesthesia or deep sedation who had residual gastric contents despite reported adherence to preoperative fasting recommendations. Available data are insufficient to inform recommendations to mitigate the risk of pulmonary aspiration during general anesthesia or deep sedation in patients taking SAXENDA, including whether modifying preoperative fasting recommendations or temporarily discontinuing SAXENDA could reduce the incidence of retained gastric contents.

Instruct patients to inform healthcare providers prior to any planned surgeries or procedures if they are taking SAXENDA.

Drug Interactions with Saxenda

Oral Medications

SAXENDA causes a delay of gastric emptying, and thereby has the potential to impact the absorption of concomitantly administered oral medications. In clinical pharmacology trials, liraglutide did not affect the absorption of the tested orally administered medications to any clinically relevant degree. Nonetheless, monitor for potential consequences of delayed absorption of oral medications concomitantly administered with SAXENDA.

Pregnancy Safety for Saxenda

Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on animal reproduction studies, there may be risks to the fetus from exposure to SAXENDA during pregnancy. SAXENDA should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. Additionally, weight loss offers no benefit to a pregnant patient and may cause fetal harm.

When a pregnancy is recognized, advise the pregnant patient of the risk to a fetus, and discontinue SAXENDA (see Clinical Considerations ). Animal reproduction studies identified increased adverse embryofetal developmental outcomes from exposure during pregnancy. Liraglutide exposure was associated with early embryonic deaths and an imbalance in some fetal abnormalities in pregnant rats administered liraglutide during organogenesis at doses that approximate clinical exposures at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 3 mg/day.

In pregnant rabbits administered liraglutide during organogenesis, decreased fetal weight and an increased incidence of major fetal abnormalities were seen at exposures below the human exposures at the MRHD (see Animal Data ). The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations is unknown. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage of clinically recognized pregnancies is respectively.

Clinical Considerations Disease-associated maternal and/or embryofetal risk Appropriate weight gain based on pre-pregnancy weight is currently recommended for all pregnant patients, including those who already have overweight or obesity, because of the obligatory weight gain that occurs in maternal tissues during pregnancy. Animal Data Liraglutide has been shown to be teratogenic in rats at or above 0.8-times systemic exposures in obese humans resulting from the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 3 mg/day based on plasma area under the time-concentration curve (AUC) comparison. Liraglutide has been shown to cause reduced growth and increased total major abnormalities in rabbits at systemic exposures below exposure in obese humans at the MRHD based on plasma AUC comparison.

The number of early embryonic deaths in the 1 mg/kg/day group increased slightly. Fetal abnormalities and variations in kidneys and blood vessels, irregular ossification of the skull, and a more complete state of ossification occurred at all doses. Mottled liver and minimally kinked ribs occurred at the highest dose.

The incidence of fetal malformations in liraglutide-treated groups exceeding concurrent and historical controls were misshapen oropharynx and/or narrowed opening into larynx at 0.1 mg/kg/day and umbilical hernia at 0.1 and 0.25 mg/kg/day. Liraglutide decreased fetal weight and dose-dependently increased the incidence of total major fetal abnormalities at all doses. The incidence of malformations exceeded concurrent and historical controls at 0.01 mg/kg/day (kidneys, scapula), greater than or equal to 0.01 mg/kg/day (eyes, forelimb), 0.025 mg/kg/day (brain, tail and sacral vertebrae, major blood vessels and heart, umbilicus), greater than or equal to 0.025 mg/kg/day (sternum) and at 0.05 mg/kg/day (parietal bones, major blood vessels).

Irregular ossification and/or skeletal abnormalities occurred in the skull and jaw, vertebrae and ribs, sternum, pelvis, tail, and scapula; and dose-dependent minor skeletal variations were observed. Visceral abnormalities occurred in blood vessels, lung, liver, and esophagus. Bilobed or bifurcated gallbladder was seen in all treatment groups, but not in the control group.

A slight delay in parturition was observed in the majority of treated rats. Group mean body weight of neonatal rats from liraglutide-treated dams was lower than neonatal rats from control group dams. Bloody scabs and agitated behavior occurred in male rats descended from dams treated with 1 mg/kg/day liraglutide.

Group mean body weight from birth to postpartum day 14 trended lower in F 2 generation rats descended from liraglutide-treated rats compared to F 2 generation rats descended from controls, but differences did not reach statistical significance for any group.

Pediatric Use of Saxenda

Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of SAXENDA as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity for chronic weight management have been established in pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with body weight above 60 kg and an initial BMI corresponding to 30 kg/m 2 or greater for adults (obese) by international cut-offs. Use of SAXENDA for this indication is supported by a 56-week double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in 251 pediatric patients aged 12 to 17 years, a pharmacokinetic study in pediatric patients, and studies in adults with obesity. In the pediatric clinical trial, one SAXENDA-treated patient had an event of pancreatitis; more episodes of hypoglycemia confirmed by self blood glucose monitoring occurred in SAXENDA-treated patients compared to placebo; and mean increases in resting heart rate of 3 to 7 bpm from baseline were observed with SAXENDA-treated patients.

The safety and effectiveness of SAXENDA have not been established in patients less than 12 years of age.

Contraindications for Saxenda

  • SAXENDA is contraindicated in:
  • Patients with a personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2 (MEN 2).
  • Patients with a serious hypersensitivity reaction to liraglutide or to any of the excipients in SAXENDA. Serious hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylactic reactions and angioedema have been reported with SAXENDA.
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2.
  • Hypersensitivity to liraglutide or any excipients in SAXENDA.

Overdosage Information for Saxenda

Overdoses have been reported in clinical trials and post-marketing use of liraglutide. Effects have included severe nausea, severe vomiting and severe hypoglycemia. In the event of overdosage, consider contacting the Poison Helpline (1-800-222-1222) or a medical toxicologist for additional overdosage management recommendations.

Initiate appropriate supportive treatment according to the patient’s clinical signs and symptoms.

Clinical Studies of Saxenda

Weight Management Trials in Adults with Overweight or Obesity The safety and efficacy of SAXENDA for chronic weight management in conjunction with reduced caloric intake and increased physical activity were studied in three 56-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In all studies, SAXENDA was titrated to 3 mg daily during a 4-week period. All patients received instruction for a reduced-calorie diet (approximately 500 kcal/day deficit) and physical activity counseling (recommended increase in physical activity of minimum 150 mins/week) that began with the first dose of study medication or placebo and continued throughout the trial.

Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either SAXENDA or placebo. Patients were stratified based on the presence or absence of abnormal blood glucose measurements at randomization. All patients were treated for up to 56 weeks.

Those patients with abnormal glucose measurements at randomization (2,254 of the 3731 patients) were treated for a total of 160 weeks. Mean baseline body weight was 106.3 kg, and mean BMI was 38.3 kg/m 2. Study 2 was a 56-week trial that enrolled 635 patients with type 2 diabetes and with either overweight or obesity (as defined above).

Patients were to have an HbA 1c of 7% to 10% and be treated with metformin, a sulfonylurea, or a glitazone as single agent or in any combination, or with a reduced-calorie diet and physical activity alone. Mean baseline body weight was 105.9 kg and mean BMI was 37.1 kg/m 2. All patients were first treated with a low-calorie diet (total energy intake 1,200-1,400 kcal/day) in a run-in period lasting up to 12 weeks.

Patients who lost at least 5% of their screening body weight after 4 to 12 weeks during the run-in were then randomized, with equal allocation, to receive either SAXENDA or placebo for 56 weeks. Mean baseline body weight was 99.6 kg and mean BMI was 35.6 kg/m 2. The proportions of patients who discontinued study drug in the 56-week trials were 27% for the SAXENDA-treated group and 35% for the placebo-treated group, and in the 160-week trial the proportions of patients who discontinued were 47% and 55%, respectively.

In the 56-week trials, approximately 10% of patients treated with SAXENDA and 4% of patients treated with placebo discontinued treatment due to an adverse reaction. The majority of patients who discontinued SAXENDA due to adverse reactions did so during the first few months of treatment. In the 160-week trial the proportions of patients who discontinued due to an adverse reaction was 13% and 6% for SAXENDA- and placebo-treated patients, respectively.

Effect of SAXENDA on Body Weight in 56-week Trials For Study 1 and Study 2, the primary efficacy parameters were mean percent change in body weight and the percentages of patients achieving greater than or equal to 5% and 10% weight loss from baseline to Week 56. For Study 3, the primary efficacy parameters were mean percent change in body weight from randomization to Week 56, the percentage of patients not gaining more than 0.5% body weight from randomization (i.e., after run-in) to Week 56, and the percentage of patients achieving greater than or equal to 5% weight loss from randomization to Week 56. Because losing at least 5% of fasting body weight through lifestyle intervention during the 4- to 12-week run-in was a condition for their continued participation in the randomized treatment period, the results may not reflect those expected in the general population.

After 56 weeks, treatment with SAXENDA resulted in a statistically significant reduction in weight compared with placebo. Statistically significantly greater proportions of patients treated with SAXENDA achieved 5% and 10% weight loss than those treated with placebo. In Study 3, statistically significantly more patients randomized to SAXENDA than placebo had not gained more than 0.5% of body weight from randomization to Week 56.

Table 4. Changes in SD = Standard Deviation; CI = Confidence Interval p < 0.0001 compared to placebo. Type 1 error was controlled across the three endpoints.

Includes all randomized subjects who had a baseline body weight measurement. All available body weight data during the 56 week treatment period are included in the analysis. In Studies 1 and 2 missing values for Week 56 were handled using multiple imputations analysis.

In Study 3 missing values for Week 56 were handled using weighted regression analysis. One way to interpret this figure is to select a change in body weight of interest on the horizontal axis and note the corresponding proportions of patients (vertical axis) in each treatment group who achieved at least that degree of weight loss. Figure 2.

Figure 3. Change from baseline (%) in body weight (Study 1 on left and Study 2 on right) Figure 4. Change from baseline (%) in body weight during Study 3 Effect of SAXENDA on Body Weight in a 160-week Trial (Study 1, Subset of Patients with Abnormal Blood Glucose at Randomization) The numbers and percentages of patients known to have lost greater than or equal to 5% body weight at Week 56 and/or Week 160 in Study 1 (patients with abnormal glucose at randomization only) are summarized in Table 5 for descriptive purposes.

Table 5. All available body weight data at 56 and 160 weeks are included in the analysis. Effect of SAXENDA on Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters in 56-week Trials Changes in waist circumference and cardiometabolic parameters with SAXENDA are shown in Table 6 for Study 1 (patients without diabetes mellitus) and Table 7 for Study 2 (patients with type 2 diabetes).

Results from Study 3, which also enrolled patients without diabetes mellitus, were similar to Study 1. Table 6. Mean Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Study 1 (Patients without Diabetes) Based on last observation carried forward method while on study drug 1 Least squares mean adjusted for treatment, country, sex, pre-diabetes status at screening, baseline BMI stratum and an interaction between pre-diabetes status at screening and BMI stratum as fixed factors, and the baseline value as covariate. 2 See Warnings and Precautions Baseline value is the geometric mean Values are baseline median, median % change, and the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the median treatment difference.

Table 7. Mean Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Study 2 (Patients with Diabetes Mellitus) Based on last observation carried forward method while on study drug 1 Least squares mean adjusted for treatment, country, sex, background treatment, baseline HbA 1c stratum and an interaction between background treatment and HbA 1c stratum as fixed factors, and the baseline value as covariate. 2 See Warnings and Precautions Baseline value is the geometric mean Values are baseline median, median % change, and the Hodges-Lehmann estimate of the median treatment difference. figure-2 figure-3 figure-4

Weight Management Trial in Pediatric Patients Ages 12 and Older with Obesity SAXENDA was evaluated in a 56-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo controlled multi-center trial in 251 pubertal pediatric patients aged 12 to 17 years, with BMI corresponding to 30 kg/m 2 or greater for adults by international cut-off points 1 and BMI of 95 th percentile or greater for age and sex (NCT02918279). After a 12-week lifestyle run-in period, patients were randomized 1:1 to SAXENDA once-daily or placebo once-daily. The SAXENDA dose was titrated to 3 mg over a 4- to 8-week period based on tolerability as judged by the investigator.

Escalation of the trial product was not allowed if the subject had a self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) <56 mg/dL or <70 mg/dL in the presence of symptoms of hypoglycemia during the week prior to or during the dose escalation visits. The proportions of patients who discontinued study drug were 19.2% for the SAXENDA-treated group and 20.6% for the placebo-treated group; 10.4% of patients treated with SAXENDA and no patients treated with placebo discontinued treatment due to an adverse reaction. The primary endpoint was change in BMI SDS.

At baseline, mean BMI SDS was 3.14 in the SAXENDA group and 3.20 in the placebo group. At Week 56, treatment with SAXENDA resulted in statistically significant reduction in BMI SDS from baseline compared to placebo. The observed mean change in BMI SDS from baseline to Week 56 was -0.23 in the SAXENDA group and -0.00 in the placebo group.

The time course of change in BMI SDS with SAXENDA and placebo from baseline through Week 56 are depicted in Figure 5. Figure 5. Change from Baseline in BMI SDS Changes in weight and BMI with SAXENDA are shown in Table 8.

Table 8. Missing observations were imputed from the placebo arm based on a jump to reference multiple (x100) imputation approach. Table 9.

Mean Changes in Anthropometry and Cardiometabolic Parameters in Study 4 (Pediatric Patients Ages 12 to Less than 18) See Warnings and Precautions Full Analysis Set. Baseline values are means, changes from baseline at Week 56 are estimated means (least-squares) and treatment contrasts at Week 56 are estimated treatment differences.

Study 1 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity)Study 2 (Type 2 diabetes with obesity or overweight)Study 3 (Obesity or overweight with comorbidity following at least 5% weight loss with diet)
SAXENDA N=2487Placebo N=1244SAXENDA N=423Placebo N=212SAXENDA N=212Placebo N=210
Weight
Baseline mean (SD) (kg)106.2 (21.2)106.2 (21.7)105.7 (21.9)106.5 (21.3)100.4 (20.8)98.7 (21.2)
Percent change from baseline (LSMean)-7.4-3-5.4-1.7-4.90.3
Difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI)-4.5 (-5.2; -3.8)-3.7 (-4.7; -2.7)-5.2 (-6.8; -3.5)
% of Patients losing greater than or equal to 5% body weight62.3%34.4%49%16.4%44.2%21.7%
Difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI)27.9 (23.9; 31.9)32.6 (25.1; 40.1)22.6 (13.9; 31.3)
% of Patients losing greater than 10% body weight33.9%15.4%22.4%5.5%25.4%6.9%
Difference from placebo (LSMean) (95% CI)18.5 (15.2; 21.7)16.9 (11.7; 22.1)18.5 (11.7; 25.3)
SAXENDA N=1505Placebo N=749
Baseline mean body weight (SD) (kg)107.5 (21.6)107.9 (21.8)
Number (%) of patients known to lose greater than or equal to 5% body weight at 56 weeks817 (56%)182 (25%)
Number (%) of patients known to lose greater than or equal to 5% body weight at 160 weeks424 (28%)102 (14%)
Number (%) of patients known to lose greater than or equal to 5% body weight at both 56 weeks and 160 weeks391 (26%)74 (10%)
Number (%) of patients with weight assessment at 160 weeks747 (50%)322 (43%)
SAXENDA N=2487Placebo N=1244
BaselineChange from Baseline (LSMean 1 )BaselineChange from Baseline (LSMean 1 )SAXENDA minus Placebo (LSMean)
Waist Circumference (cm)115-8.2114.5-4-4.2
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)123-4.3123.3-1.5-2.8
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)78.7-2.778.9-1.8-0.9
Heart Rate (bpm) 271.42.671.30.12.5
HbA 1c (%)5.6-0.35.6-0.1-0.2
Baseline% Change from Baseline (LSMean 1 )Baseline% Change from Baseline (LSMean 1 )Relative Difference of SAXENDA to Placebo (LSMean)
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)193.8-3.2194.4-0.9-2.3
LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)111.8-3.1112.3-0.7-2.4
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)51.42.350.90.51.9
Triglycerides (mg/dL)125.7-13128.3-4.1-7.1
SAXENDA N=423Placebo N=212
BaselineChange from Baseline (LSMean 1 )BaselineChange From Baseline (LSMean 1 )SAXENDA minus Placebo (LSMean)
Waist Circumference (cm)118.1-6117.3-2.8-3.2
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)128.9-3129.2-0.4-2.6
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)79-179.3-0.6-0.4
Heart Rate (bpm) 274274-1.53.4
HbA 1c (%)7.9-1.37.9-0.4-0.9
Baseline% Change from Baseline (LSMean 1 )Baseline% Change From Baseline (LSMean 1 )Relative Difference of SAXENDA to Placebo (LSMean)
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)171-1.4169.42.4-3.7
LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)86.40.985.23.3-2.3
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)45.24.845.41.92.9
Triglycerides (mg/dL)156.2-14.5155.8-0.7-13.5
SAXENDA N=125Placebo N=126SAXENDA minus Placebo
Body Weight
Baseline mean Body Weight (kg)99.3102.2
Mean Change from Baseline (%)-2.652.37-5.01
BMI
Baseline mean BMI (kg/m 2 )35.335.8
Mean Change from Baseline (%)-4.290.35-4.64
Proportion of patients with greater than or equal to 5% reduction in baseline BMI at Week 56 (%)43.3%18.7%24.6%
Proportion of patients with greater than or equal to 10% reduction in baseline BMI at Week 56 (%)26.1%8.1%18%
SAXENDA N=125Placebo N=126
BaselineChange from BaselineBaselineChange from BaselineSAXENDA minus Placebo
Waist Circumference (cm)105-4.35107-1.42-2.93
Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)116-1.211170.84-2.05
Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg)720.7773-0.461.24
Heart Rate (bpm)751.8778-0.142.01
HbA 1c (%)5.3-0.15.3-0.03-0.06
Baseline% Change from BaselineBaseline% Change from BaselineRelative Difference of SAXENDA to Placebo
Total Cholesterol (mg/dL)154.20.84152.2-0.030.88
LDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)85.51.7482.53.01-1.27
HDL Cholesterol (mg/dL)42.75.1442.73.331.81
Triglycerides (mg/dL)109.1-0.12112.2-1.351.23
See Warnings and Precautions ( 5.5 )

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Saxenda?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Saxenda Prices