Ruxience Drug Information

Generic name: RITUXIMAB-PVVR

CD20-directed Cytolytic Antibody [EPC]

Save on Ruxience at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Ruxience

Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) RUXIENCE is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with: • Relapsed or refractory, low-grade or follicular, CD20-positive, B-cell NHL as a single agent. • Previously untreated follicular, CD20-positive, B-cell NHL in combination with first line chemotherapy and, in patients achieving a complete or partial response to a rituximab product in combination with chemotherapy, as single-agent maintenance therapy. • Non-progressing (including stable disease), low-grade, CD20-positive, B-cell NHL as a single agent after first-line cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone (CVP) chemotherapy. • Previously untreated diffuse large B-cell, CD20-positive NHL in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (CHOP) or other anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) RUXIENCE, in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC), is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated and previously treated CD20-positive CLL.

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) RUXIENCE, in combination with methotrexate, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderately-to-severely-active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to one or more Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) antagonist therapies.

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) (Wegener's Granulomatosis) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA) RUXIENCE, in combination with glucocorticoids, is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) (Wegener's Granulomatosis) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA).

Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) RUXIENCE is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe pemphigus vulgaris.

Dosage & Administration of Ruxience

Important Dosing Information

Administer only as an intravenous infusion. Do not administer as an intravenous push or bolus. RUXIENCE should only be administered by a healthcare professional with appropriate medical support to manage severe infusion-related reactions that can be fatal if they occur.

Premedicate before each infusion. Prior to First Infusion Screen all patients for HBV infection by measuring HBsAg and anti-HBc before initiating treatment with RUXIENCE. Obtain complete blood counts (CBC) including platelets prior to the first dose.

During RUXIENCE Therapy In patients with lymphoid malignancies, during treatment with RUXIENCE monotherapy, obtain complete blood counts (CBC) with differential and platelet counts prior to each RUXIENCE course. During treatment with RUXIENCE and chemotherapy, obtain CBC with differential and platelet counts at weekly to monthly intervals and more frequently in patients who develop cytopenias. In patients with RA, GPA or MPA, obtain CBC with differential and platelet counts at two to four month intervals during RUXIENCE therapy.

Continue to monitor for cytopenias after final dose and until resolution. • First Infusion Standard Infusion: Initiate infusion at a rate of 50 mg/hour. In the absence of infusion toxicity, increase infusion rate by 50 mg/hour increments every 30 minutes, to a maximum of 400 mg/hour. • Subsequent Infusions Standard Infusion: Initiate infusion at a rate of 100 mg/hour. For Previously Untreated Follicular NHL and DLBCL Adult Patients: If patients did not experience a Grade 3 or 4 infusion-related adverse event during Cycle 1, a 90-minute infusion can be administered in Cycle 2 with a glucocorticoid-containing chemotherapy regimen.

If the 90-minute infusion is tolerated in Cycle 2, the same rate can be used when administering the remainder of the treatment regimen (through Cycle 6 or 8). Patients who have clinically significant cardiovascular disease or who have a circulating lymphocyte count greater than or equal to 5,000/mm 3 before Cycle 2 should not be administered the 90-minute infusion. • Interrupt the infusion or slow the infusion rate for infusion-related reactions. Continue the infusion at one-half the previous rate upon improvement of symptoms.

Recommended Dose for Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL)

The recommended dose is 375 mg/m 2 as an intravenous infusion according to the following schedules: • Relapsed or Refractory, Low-Grade or Follicular, CD20-Positive, B-Cell NHL Administer once weekly for 4 or 8 doses. • Retreatment for Relapsed or Refractory, Low-Grade or Follicular, CD20-Positive, B-Cell NHL Administer once weekly for 4 doses. • Previously Untreated, Follicular, CD20-Positive, B-Cell NHL Administer on Day 1 of each cycle of chemotherapy for up to 8 doses. In patients with complete or partial response, initiate RUXIENCE maintenance eight weeks following completion of a rituximab product in combination with chemotherapy. Refer to the Zevalin package insert for full prescribing information regarding the Zevalin therapeutic regimen.

Recommended Dose for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) • Administer

RUXIENCE as two-1,000 mg intravenous infusions separated by 2 weeks. • Glucocorticoids administered as methylprednisolone 100 mg intravenous or its equivalent 30 minutes prior to each infusion are recommended to reduce the incidence and severity of infusion-related reactions. • Subsequent courses should be administered every 24 weeks or based on clinical evaluation, but not sooner than every 16 weeks. • RUXIENCE is given in combination with methotrexate.

Recommended Dose for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) (Wegener's Granulomatosis) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA) Induction Treatment of Adult Patients with Active GPA/MPA • Administer RUXIENCE as a 375 mg/m 2 intravenous infusion once weekly for 4 weeks for patients with active GPA or MPA. • Glucocorticoids administered as methylprednisolone 1,000 mg intravenously per day for 1 to 3 days followed by oral prednisone as per clinical practice. This regimen should begin within 14 days prior to or with the initiation of RUXIENCE and may continue during and after the 4 week induction course of RUXIENCE treatment. Follow up Treatment of Adult Patients with GPA/MPA who have Achieved Disease Control with Induction Treatment • Administer RUXIENCE as two 500 mg intravenous infusions separated by two weeks, followed by a 500 mg intravenous infusion every 6 months thereafter based on clinical evaluation. • If induction treatment of active disease was with a rituximab product, initiate follow up treatment with RUXIENCE within 24 weeks after the last induction infusion with a rituximab product or based on clinical evaluation, but no sooner than 16 weeks after the last induction infusion with a rituximab product. • If induction treatment of active disease was with other standard of care immunosuppressants, initiate RUXIENCE follow up treatment within the 4 week period that follows achievement of disease control.

Recommended Dose for Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) • Administer

RUXIENCE as two-1,000 mg intravenous infusions separated by 2 weeks in combination with a tapering course of glucocorticoids. • Maintenance treatment Administer RUXIENCE as a 500 mg intravenous infusion at Month 12 and every 6 months thereafter or based on clinical evaluation. • Treatment of relapse Administer RUXIENCE as a 1,000 mg intravenous infusion on relapse, and consider resuming or increasing the glucocorticoid dose based on clinical evaluation. Subsequent infusions of RUXIENCE may be administered no sooner than 16 weeks following the previous infusion.

Recommended Dose for Premedication and Prophylactic Medications Premedicate with acetaminophen and an antihistamine before each infusion of RUXIENCE. For adult patients administered RUXIENCE according to the 90-minute infusion rate, the glucocorticoid component of their chemotherapy regimen should be administered prior to infusion. For RA, GPA and MPA, and PV patients, methylprednisolone 100 mg intravenously or its equivalent is recommended 30 minutes prior to each infusion.

Provide prophylaxis treatment for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) and herpes virus infections for patients with CLL during treatment and for up to 12 months following treatment as appropriate. PCP prophylaxis is also recommended for patients with GPA and MPA during treatment and for at least 6 months following the last RUXIENCE infusion. PCP prophylaxis should be considered for patients with PV during and following RUXIENCE treatment.

Administration and Storage

Use appropriate aseptic technique. Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration. RUXIENCE should be a clear to slightly opalescent, colorless to pale brownish-yellow liquid.

Do not use vial if particulates or discoloration is present. Administration Use a sterile needle and syringe to prepare RUXIENCE. Gently invert the bag to mix the solution.

Do not mix or dilute with other drugs. Discard any unused portion left in the vial. Storage If not used immediately, store diluted RUXIENCE solutions as shown in the table below.

No incompatibilities between RUXIENCE and polyvinylchloride bags have been observed.

Diluted RUXIENCE Solution Storage Conditions
Diluent Used to Prepare Solution for InfusionDiluted RUXIENCE Solution Storage Conditions
0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USPStore RUXIENCE solution diluted in 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP refrigerated at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) for up to 16 days after preparation.
5% Dextrose Injection, USPStore RUXIENCE solution diluted in 5% Dextrose Injection, USP refrigerated at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) for up to 24 hours after preparation.

Side Effects of Ruxience

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. B-Cell Malignancies The data described below reflect exposure to rituximab in 3,092 patients, with exposures ranging from a single infusion up to 2 years. Rituximab was studied in both single-arm and controlled trials (n=356 and n=2,427).

Most NHL patients received rituximab as an infusion of 375 mg/m 2 per infusion, given as a single agent weekly for up to 8 doses, in combination with chemotherapy for up to 8 doses, or following chemotherapy for up to 16 doses. Seventy-one percent of CLL patients received 6 cycles and 90% received at least 3 cycles of rituximab-based therapy. The most common adverse reactions of rituximab (incidence greater than or equal to 25%) observed in clinical trials of patients with NHL were infusion-related reactions, fever, lymphopenia, chills, infection, and asthenia.

Infusion-Related Reactions In the majority of patients with NHL, infusion-related reactions consisting of fever, chills/rigors, nausea, pruritus, angioedema, hypotension, headache, bronchospasm, urticaria, rash, vomiting, myalgia, dizziness, or hypertension occurred during the first rituximab infusion. Infusion-related reactions typically occurred within 30 to 120 minutes of beginning the first infusion and resolved with slowing or interruption of the rituximab infusion and with supportive care (diphenhydramine, acetaminophen, and intravenous saline). The incidence of infusion-related reactions was highest during the first infusion (77%) and decreased with each subsequent infusion.

Infections Serious infections (NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or 4), including sepsis, occurred in less than 5% of patients with NHL in the single-arm studies. In randomized, controlled studies where rituximab was administered following chemotherapy for the treatment of follicular or low-grade NHL, the rate of infection was higher among patients who received rituximab. In diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients, viral infections occurred more frequently in those who received rituximab.

Cytopenias and Hypogammaglobulinemia In patients with NHL receiving rituximab monotherapy, NCI-CTC Grade 3 and 4 cytopenias were reported in 48% of patients. A single occurrence of transient aplastic anemia (pure red cell aplasia) and two occurrences of hemolytic anemia following rituximab therapy occurred during the single-arm studies. In studies of monotherapy, rituximab-induced B-cell depletion occurred in 70% to 80% of patients with NHL.

Decreased IgM and IgG serum levels occurred in 14% of these patients. In CLL trials, the frequency of prolonged neutropenia and late-onset neutropenia was higher in patients treated with rituximab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (R-FC) compared to patients treated with FC. Prolonged neutropenia is defined as Grade 3–4 neutropenia that has not resolved between 24 and 42 days after the last dose of study treatment.

Late-onset neutropenia is defined as Grade 3–4 neutropenia starting at least 42 days after the last treatment dose. In patients with previously untreated CLL, the frequency of prolonged neutropenia was 8.5% for patients who received R-FC (n=402) and 5.8% for patients who received FC (n=398). For patients with previously treated CLL, the frequency of prolonged neutropenia was 24.8% for patients who received R-FC (n=274) and 19.1% for patients who received FC (n=274).

Relapsed or Refractory, Low-Grade NHL Adverse reactions presented in Table 1 occurred in 356 patients with relapsed or refractory, low-grade or follicular, CD20-positive, B-cell NHL treated in single-arm studies of rituximab administered as a single agent. Table 1 Incidence of Adverse Reactions in Greater than or Equal to 5% of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory, Low-Grade or Follicular NHL, Receiving Single-agent Rituximab (N=356) Adverse reactions observed up to 12 months following rituximab., Adverse reactions graded for severity by NCI-CTC criteria. 6 1 In these single-arm rituximab studies, bronchiolitis obliterans occurred during and up to 6 months after rituximab infusion. Previously Untreated, Low-Grade or Follicular, NHL In NHL Study 4, patients in the R-CVP arm experienced a higher incidence of infusional toxicity and neutropenia compared to patients in the CVP arm.

In NHL Study 5, detailed safety data collection was limited to serious adverse reactions, Grade greater than or equal to 2 infections, and Grade greater than or equal to 3 adverse reactions. In patients receiving rituximab as single-agent maintenance therapy following rituximab plus chemotherapy, infections were reported more frequently compared to the observation arm (37% vs. 22%). Detailed safety data collection in these studies was primarily limited to Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions and serious adverse reactions.

In NHL Study 8, a review of cardiac toxicity determined that supraventricular arrhythmias or tachycardia accounted for most of the difference in cardiac disorders (4.5% for R-CHOP vs. 1.0% for CHOP). CLL The data below reflect exposure to rituximab in combination with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in 676 patients with CLL in CLL Study 1 (NCT00281918) or CLL Study 2 (NCT00090051). The age range was 30–83 years and 71% were men.

Detailed safety data collection in CLL Study 1 was limited to Grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions and serious adverse reactions. Infusion-related adverse reactions were defined by any of the following adverse events occurring during or within 24 hours of the start of infusion: nausea, pyrexia, chills, hypotension, vomiting, and dyspnea. Fifty-nine percent of R-FC-treated patients experienced an infusion-related reaction of any severity.

Rheumatoid Arthritis The data presented below reflect the experience in 2,578 RA patients treated with rituximab in controlled and long-term studies Pooled studies: NCT00074438, NCT00422383, NCT00468546, NCT00299130, NCT00282308, NCT00266227, NCT02693210, NCT02093026 and NCT02097745. with a total exposure of 5,014 patient-years. Among all exposed patients, adverse reactions reported in greater than 10% of patients include infusion-related reactions, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, urinary tract infection, and bronchitis. Adverse reactions reported in greater than or equal to 5% of patients were hypertension, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, arthralgia, pyrexia and pruritus (see Table 2).

Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Coded using MedDRA. Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 2% and at Least 1% Greater than Placebo Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Clinical Studies Up to Week 24 (Pooled) 9 Infusion-Related Reactions In the rituximab RA pooled placebo-controlled studies, 32% of rituximab-treated patients experienced an adverse reaction during or within 24 hours following their first infusion, compared to 23% of placebo-treated patients receiving their first infusion. The incidence of adverse reactions during the 24-hour period following the second infusion, rituximab or placebo, decreased to 11% and 13%, respectively.

Acute infusion-related reactions (manifested by fever, chills, rigors, pruritus, urticaria/rash, angioedema, sneezing, throat irritation, cough, and/or bronchospasm, with or without associated hypotension or hypertension) were experienced by 27% of rituximab-treated patients following their first infusion, compared to 19% of placebo-treated patients receiving their first placebo infusion. The incidence of these acute infusion-related reactions following the second infusion of rituximab or placebo decreased to 9% and 11%, respectively. Serious acute infusion-related reactions were experienced by less than 1% of patients in either treatment group.

Acute infusion-related reactions required dose modification (stopping, slowing, or interruption of the infusion) in 10% and 2% of patients receiving rituximab or placebo, respectively, after the first course. The proportion of patients experiencing acute infusion-related reactions decreased with subsequent courses of rituximab. The administration of intravenous glucocorticoids prior to rituximab infusions reduced the incidence and severity of such reactions, however, there was no clear benefit from the administration of oral glucocorticoids for the prevention of acute infusion-related reactions.

Patients in clinical studies also received antihistamines and acetaminophen prior to rituximab infusions. Infections In the pooled, placebo-controlled studies, 39% of patients in the rituximab group experienced an infection of any type compared to 34% of patients in the placebo group. The most common infections were nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, bronchitis, and sinusitis.

The incidence of serious infections was 2% in the rituximab-treated patients and 1% in the placebo group. In the experience with rituximab in 2,578 RA patients, the rate of serious infections was 4.31 per 100 patient-years. The most common serious infections (greater than or equal to 0.5%) were pneumonia or lower respiratory tract infections, cellulitis and urinary tract infections.

Fatal serious infections included pneumonia, sepsis and colitis. Rates of serious infection remained stable in patients receiving subsequent courses. In 185 rituximab-treated RA patients with active disease, subsequent treatment with a biologic DMARD, the majority of which were TNF antagonists, did not appear to increase the rate of serious infection.

Cardiovascular Adverse Reactions In the pooled, placebo-controlled studies, the proportion of patients with serious cardiovascular reactions was 1.7% and 1.3% in the rituximab and placebo treatment groups, respectively. Three cardiovascular deaths occurred during the double-blind period of the RA studies including all rituximab regimens (3/769=0.4%) as compared to none in the placebo treatment group (0/389). In the experience with rituximab in 2,578 RA patients, the rate of serious cardiac reactions was 1.93 per 100 patient-years.

These rates did not increase over three courses of rituximab. Since patients with RA are at increased risk for cardiovascular events compared with the general population, patients with RA should be monitored throughout the infusion and RUXIENCE should be discontinued in the event of a serious or life-threatening cardiac event. Hypophosphatemia was more common in patients who received corticosteroids.

The majority of the observed hypophosphatemia occurred at the time of the infusions and was transient. Retreatment in Patients with RA In the experience with rituximab in RA patients, 2,578 patients have been exposed to rituximab and have received up to 10 courses of rituximab in RA clinical trials, with 1,890, 1,043, and 425 patients having received at least two, three, and four courses, respectively. Most of the patients who received additional courses did so 24 weeks or more after the previous course and none were retreated sooner than 16 weeks.

The rates and types of adverse reactions reported for subsequent courses of rituximab were similar to rates and types seen for a single course of rituximab. In RA Study 2, where all patients initially received rituximab, the safety profile of patients who were retreated with rituximab was similar to those who were retreated with placebo. Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) (Wegener's Granulomatosis) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA) Induction Treatment of Adult Patients with Active GPA/MPA (GPA/MPA Study 1) The data presented below from GPA/MPA Study 1 (NCT00104299) reflect the experience in 197 adult patients with active GPA and MPA treated with rituximab or cyclophosphamide in a single controlled study, which was conducted in two phases: a 6-month randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled remission induction phase and an additional 12-month remission maintenance phase.

In the 6-month remission induction phase, 197 patients with GPA and MPA were randomized to either rituximab 375 mg/m 2 once weekly for 4 weeks plus glucocorticoids, or oral cyclophosphamide 2 mg/kg daily (adjusted for renal function, white blood cell count, and other factors) plus glucocorticoids to induce remission. Once remission was achieved or at the end of the 6-month remission induction period, the cyclophosphamide group received azathioprine to maintain remission. The rituximab group did not receive additional therapy to maintain remission.

The primary analysis was at the end of the 6-month remission induction period and the safety results for this period are described below. Adverse reactions presented below in Table 3 were adverse events which occurred at a rate of greater than or equal to 10% in the rituximab group. This table reflects experience in 99 GPA and MPA patients treated with rituximab, with a total of 47.6 patient-years of observation and 98 GPA and MPA patients treated with cyclophosphamide, with a total of 47.0 patient-years of observation.

Infection was the most common category of adverse events reported (47–62%) and is discussed below. Table 3 Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 10% of Rituximab-treated Patients with Active GPA and MPA in the GPA/MPA Study 1 Up to Month 6 The study design allowed for crossover or treatment by best medical judgment, and 13 patients in each treatment group received a second therapy during the 6-month study period. in GPA/MPA Study 1 were defined as any adverse event occurring within 24 hours of an infusion and considered to be infusion-related by investigators. Infusion-related reactions included cytokine release syndrome, flushing, throat irritation, and tremor.

In the rituximab group, the proportion of patients experiencing an infusion-related reaction was following the first, second, third, and fourth infusions, respectively. Patients were pre-medicated with antihistamine and acetaminophen before each rituximab infusion and were on background oral corticosteroids which may have mitigated or masked an infusion-related reaction; however, there is insufficient evidence to determine whether premedication diminishes the frequency or severity of infusion-related reactions. The most common infections in the rituximab group were upper respiratory tract infections, urinary tract infections, and herpes zoster.

The most common serious infection was pneumonia. Hypogammaglobulinemia Hypogammaglobulinemia (IgA, IgG, or IgM below the lower limit of normal) has been observed in patients with GPA and MPA treated with rituximab in GPA/MPA Study 1. Follow up Treatment of Adult Patients with GPA/MPA who have Achieved Disease Control with Induction Treatment (GPA/MPA Study 2) In GPA/MPA Study 2 (NCT00748644), an open-label, controlled, clinical study, evaluating the efficacy and safety of non-U.S.-licensed rituximab versus azathioprine as follow up treatment in adult patients with GPA, MPA or renal-limited ANCA-associated vasculitis who had achieved disease control after induction treatment with cyclophosphamide, a total of 57 GPA and MPA patients in disease remission received follow up treatment with two 500 mg intravenous infusions of non-U.S.-licensed rituximab, separated by two weeks on Day 1 and Day 15, followed by a 500 mg intravenous infusion every 6 months for 18 months.

The safety profile was consistent with the safety profile for rituximab in RA and GPA and MPA. Infusion-Related Reactions In GPA/MPA Study 2, 7/57 (12%) patients in the non-U.S.-licensed rituximab arm reported infusion-related reactions. The incidence of IRR symptoms was highest during or after the first infusion (9%) and decreased with subsequent infusions (less than 4%).

One patient had two serious IRRs, two IRRs led to a dose modification, and no IRRs were severe, fatal, or led to withdrawal from the study. The incidence of all grade infections was similar between the arms. The incidence of serious infections was similar in both arms (12%).

The most commonly reported serious infection in the group was mild or moderate bronchitis. Long-term, Observational Study with Rituximab in Patients with GPA/MPA (GPA/MPA Study 3) In a long-term observational safety study (NCT01613599), 97 patients with GPA or MPA received treatment with rituximab (mean of 8 infusions ) for up to 4 years, according to physician standard practice and discretion. Majority of patients received doses ranging from 500 mg to 1,000 mg, approximately every 6 months.

Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) PV Study 1 PV Study 1 (NCT00784589), a randomized, controlled, multicenter open-label study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of non-U.S.-licensed rituximab in combination with short-term prednisone compared to prednisone monotherapy in 90 patients (74 Pemphigus Vulgaris patients and 16 Pemphigus Foliaceus patients). Safety results for the PV patient population during the 24-month treatment period are described below. Adverse reactions from PV Study 1 are presented below in Table 4 and were adverse events which occurred at a rate greater than or equal to 5% among PV patients treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab and with at least 2% absolute difference in incidence between the group treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab and the prednisone monotherapy group up to Month 24.

No patients in the group treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab withdrew due to adverse reactions. The clinical study did not include sufficient number of patients to allow for direct comparison of adverse reaction rates between treatment groups. Table 4 Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 5% Among PV Patients Treated with Non-U.S.-licensed Rituximab and with at Least 2% Absolute Difference in Incidence Between the Group Treated with Non-U.S.-licensed Rituximab with Short-term Prednisone and the Group Treated with Prednisone Monotherapy in PV Study 1 (Up to Month 24) were the most commonly reported adverse drug reactions (58%, 22 patients).

No patients were withdrawn from treatment due to infusion-related reactions. Symptoms of infusion-related reactions were similar in type and severity to those seen in RA and GPA and MPA patients. Infections Fourteen patients (37%) in the group treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab experienced treatment-related infections compared to 15 patients (42%) in the prednisone group.

The most common infections in the group treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab were herpes simplex, herpes zoster, bronchitis, urinary tract infection, fungal infection, and conjunctivitis. Three patients (8%) in the group treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab experienced a total of 5 serious infections ( Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, infective thrombosis, intervertebral discitis, lung infection, Staphylococcal sepsis) and 1 patient (3%) in the prednisone group experienced 1 serious infection ( Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia). In PV Study 2, ADR defined as adverse events occurring in greater than or equal to 5% of patients in the rituximab arms and assessed as related are shown in Table 5.

Table 5 Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 5% of Rituximab-treated Pemphigus Vulgaris Patients N= Infusion-Related Reactions In PV Study 2, IRRs occurred primarily at the first infusion and the frequency of IRRs decreased with subsequent infusions: of patients experienced IRRs at the first, second, third, and fourth infusions, respectively. In 11/15 patients who experienced at least one IRR, the IRRs were Grade 1 or 2. In 4/15 patients, Grade greater than or equal to 3 IRRs were reported and led to discontinuation of rituximab treatment; three of the four patients experienced serious IRRs.

Serious IRRs occurred at the first (2 patients) or second (1 patient) infusion and resolved with symptomatic treatment. Infections In PV Study 2, 42/67 patients (62.7%) in the rituximab arm experienced infections. The most common infections in the rituximab arm were upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, oral candidiasis, and urinary tract infection.

Six patients (9%) in the rituximab arm experienced serious infections. Laboratory Abnormalities In PV Study 2, in the rituximab arm, transient decreases in T-cell lymphocytes and phosphorus level were very commonly observed post-infusion. In some cases, treatment of hypophosphatemia was required.

Hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG or IgM below the lower limit of normal), including prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia (defined as Ig levels below lower limit of normal for at least 4 months) was observed in PV Study 2. Differences in assay methods preclude meaningful comparisons of the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in the studies described below with the incidence of anti-drug antibodies in other studies, including those of rituximab or of other rituximab products. Using an ELISA assay, anti-rituximab antibody was detected in 4 of 356 (1.1%) patients with low-grade or follicular NHL receiving single-agent rituximab.

Three of the four patients had an objective clinical response. A total of 273/2578 (11%) patients with RA tested positive for anti-rituximab antibodies at any time after receiving rituximab. Anti-rituximab antibody positivity was not associated with increased rates of infusion-related reactions or other adverse events.

Upon further treatment, the proportions of patients with infusion-related reactions were similar between anti-rituximab antibody positive and negative patients, and most reactions were mild to moderate. Four anti-rituximab antibody positive patients had serious infusion-related reactions, and the temporal relationship between anti-rituximab antibody positivity and infusion-related reaction was variable. The clinical relevance of anti-rituximab antibody formation in rituximab-treated adult patients is unclear.

Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of rituximab. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. • Hematologic: prolonged pancytopenia, marrow hypoplasia, Grade 3–4 prolonged or late-onset neutropenia, hyperviscosity syndrome in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia. • Cardiac: fatal cardiac failure. • Immune/Autoimmune Events: uveitis, optic neuritis, systemic vasculitis, pleuritis, lupus-like syndrome, serum sickness, polyarticular arthritis, and vasculitis with rash. • Infection: viral infections, including progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), increase in fatal infections in HIV-associated lymphoma, and a reported increased incidence of Grade 3 and 4 infections. • Neoplasia: disease progression of Kaposi's sarcoma. • Skin: severe mucocutaneous reactions, pyoderma gangrenosum (including genital presentation). • Gastrointestinal: bowel obstruction and perforation. • Pulmonary: fatal bronchiolitis obliterans and fatal interstitial lung disease. • Nervous system: Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)/Reversible Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome (RPLS).

Table 1 Incidence of Adverse Reactions in Greater than or Equal to 5% of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory, Low-Grade or Follicular NHL, Receiving Single-agent Rituximab (N=356) Adverse reactions observed up to 12 months following rituximab., Adverse reactions graded for severity by NCI-CTC criteria.
All Grades (%)Grade 3 and 4 (%)
Any Adverse Reactions9957
Body as a Whole8610
Fever531
Chills333
Infection314
Asthenia261
Headache191
Abdominal Pain141
Pain121
Back Pain101
Throat Irritation90
Flushing50
Heme and Lymphatic System6748
Lymphopenia4840
Leukopenia144
Neutropenia146
Thrombocytopenia122
Anemia83
Skin and Appendages442
Night Sweats151
Rash151
Pruritus141
Urticaria81
Respiratory System384
Increased Cough131
Rhinitis121
Bronchospasm81
Dyspnea71
Sinusitis60
Metabolic and Nutritional Disorders383
Angioedema111
Hyperglycemia91
Peripheral Edema80
LDH Increase70
Digestive System372
Nausea231
Diarrhea101
Vomiting101
Nervous System321
Dizziness101
Anxiety51
Musculoskeletal System263
Myalgia101
Arthralgia101
Cardiovascular System253
Hypotension101
Hypertension61
Table 2 These data are based on 938 patients treated in Phase 2 and 3 studies of rituximab (2 × 1,000 mg) or placebo administered in combination with methotrexate. Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Coded using MedDRA. Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 2% and at Least 1% Greater than Placebo Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients in Clinical Studies Up to Week 24 (Pooled)
Adverse ReactionPlacebo + MTX N=398 n (%)Rituximab + MTX N=540 n (%)
Hypertension21 (5)43 (8)
Nausea19 (5)41 (8)
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection23 (6)37 (7)
Arthralgia14 (4)31 (6)
Pyrexia8 (2)27 (5)
Pruritus5 (1)26 (5)
Chills9 (2)16 (3)
Dyspepsia3 (<1)16 (3)
Rhinitis6 (2)14 (3)
Paresthesia3 (<1)12 (2)
Urticaria3 (<1)12 (2)
Abdominal Pain Upper4 (1)11 (2)
Throat Irritation0 (0)11 (2)
Anxiety5 (1)9 (2)
Migraine2 (<1)9 (2)
Asthenia1 (<1)9 (2)
Table 3 Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 10% of Rituximab-treated Patients with Active GPA and MPA in the GPA/MPA Study 1 Up to Month 6 The study design allowed for crossover or treatment by best medical judgment, and 13 patients in each treatment group received a second therapy during the 6-month study period.
Adverse ReactionRituximab N=99 n (%)Cyclophosphamide N=98 n (%)
Nausea18 (18%)20 (20%)
Diarrhea17 (17%)12 (12%)
Headache17 (17%)19 (19%)
Muscle Spasms17 (17%)15 (15%)
Anemia16 (16%)20 (20%)
Peripheral Edema16 (16%)6 (6%)
Insomnia14 (14%)12 (12%)
Arthralgia13 (13%)9 (9%)
Cough13 (13%)11 (11%)
Fatigue13 (13%)21 (21%)
Increased ALT13 (13%)15 (15%)
Hypertension12 (12%)5 (5%)
Epistaxis11 (11%)6 (6%)
Dyspnea10 (10%)11 (11%)
Leukopenia10 (10%)26 (27%)
Rash10 (10%)17 (17%)
Table 4 Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 5% Among PV Patients Treated with Non-U.S.-licensed Rituximab and with at Least 2% Absolute Difference in Incidence Between the Group Treated with Non-U.S.-licensed Rituximab with Short-term Prednisone and the Group Treated with Prednisone Monotherapy in PV Study 1 (Up to Month 24)
N/A = not applicable
Adverse ReactionNon-U.S.-Licensed Rituximab + Short-term Prednisone N=38 n (%)Prednisone N=36 n (%)
Infusion-related reactions Infusion-related reactions included symptoms collected on the next scheduled visit after each infusion, and adverse reactions occurring on the day of or one day after the infusion. The most common infusion-related reactions included headaches, chills, high blood pressure, nausea, asthenia, and pain.22 (58%)N/A
Depression7 (18%)4 (11%)
Herpes simplex5 (13%)1 (3%)
Alopecia5 (13%)0 (0%)
Fatigue3 (8%)2 (6%)
Abdominal pain upper2 (5%)1 (3%)
Conjunctivitis2 (5%)0 (0%)
Dizziness2 (5%)0 (0%)
Headache2 (5%)1 (3%)
Herpes zoster2 (5%)1 (3%)
Irritability2 (5%)0 (0%)
Musculoskeletal pain2 (5%)0 (0%)
Pruritus2 (5%)0 (0%)
Pyrexia2 (5%)0 (0%)
Skin disorder2 (5%)0 (0%)
Skin papilloma2 (5%)0 (0%)
Tachycardia2 (5%)0 (0%)
Urticaria2 (5%)0 (0%)
Table 5 Incidence of All Adverse Reactions Occurring in Greater than or Equal to 5% of Rituximab-treated Pemphigus Vulgaris Patients (N=67) from PV Study 2 (up to Week 52)
Adverse ReactionsRituximab (N=67)
Infusion-related reactions15 (22%) The most common infusion-related reaction symptoms/Preferred Terms for PV Study 2 in the rituximab arm were dyspnea, erythema, hyperhidrosis, flushing/hot flush, hypotension/low blood pressure, and rash/rash pruritic.
Upper respiratory tract infection/Nasopharyngitis11 (16%)
Headache10 (15%)
Asthenia/Fatigue9 (13%)
Oral candidiasis6 (9%)
Arthralgia6 (9%)
Back pain6 (9%)
Urinary tract infection5 (8%)
Dizziness4 (6%)

Warnings & Cautions for Ruxience

Infusion-Related Reactions

Rituximab products can cause severe, including fatal, infusion-related reactions. Severe reactions typically occurred during the first infusion with time to onset of 30 to 120 minutes. Rituximab product-induced infusion-related reactions and sequelae include urticaria, hypotension, angioedema, hypoxia, bronchospasm, pulmonary infiltrates, acute respiratory distress syndrome, myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation, cardiogenic shock, anaphylactoid events, or death.

Premedicate patients with an antihistamine and acetaminophen prior to dosing. For RA, GPA and MPA, and PV patients, methylprednisolone 100 mg intravenously or its equivalent is recommended 30 minutes prior to each infusion. Institute medical management (e.g., glucocorticoids, epinephrine, bronchodilators, or oxygen) for infusion-related reactions as needed.

Depending on the severity of the infusion-related reaction and the required interventions, temporarily or permanently discontinue RUXIENCE. Resume infusion at a minimum 50% reduction in rate after symptoms have resolved. Closely monitor the following patients: those with pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary conditions, those who experienced prior cardiopulmonary adverse reactions, and those with high numbers of circulating malignant cells (greater than or equal to 25,000/mm 3 ).

Severe Mucocutaneous Reactions

Mucocutaneous reactions, some with fatal outcome, can occur in patients treated with rituximab products. These reactions include paraneoplastic pemphigus, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, lichenoid dermatitis, vesiculobullous dermatitis, and toxic epidermal necrolysis. The onset of these reactions has been variable and includes reports with onset on the first day of rituximab exposure.

Discontinue RUXIENCE in patients who experience a severe mucocutaneous reaction. The safety of re-administration of rituximab products to patients with severe mucocutaneous reactions has not been determined.

Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Reactivation Hepatitis

B virus (HBV) reactivation, in some cases resulting in fulminant hepatitis, hepatic failure, and death, can occur in patients treated with drugs classified as CD20-directed cytolytic antibodies, including rituximab products. Cases have been reported in patients who are hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and also in patients who are HBsAg negative but are hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc) positive. Reactivation also has occurred in patients who appear to have resolved hepatitis B infection (i.e., HBsAg negative, anti-HBc positive and hepatitis B surface antibody positive).

HBV reactivation is defined as an abrupt increase in HBV replication manifesting as a rapid increase in serum HBV DNA levels or detection of HBsAg in a person who was previously HBsAg negative and anti-HBc positive. Reactivation of HBV replication is often followed by hepatitis, i.e., increase in transaminase levels. In severe cases increase in bilirubin levels, liver failure, and death can occur.

Screen all patients for HBV infection by measuring HBsAg and anti-HBc before initiating treatment with RUXIENCE. For patients who show evidence of prior hepatitis B infection (HBsAg positive or HBsAg negative but anti-HBc positive), consult with physicians with expertise in managing hepatitis B regarding monitoring and consideration for HBV antiviral therapy before and/or during RUXIENCE treatment. Monitor patients with evidence of current or prior HBV infection for clinical and laboratory signs of hepatitis or HBV reactivation during and for several months following RUXIENCE therapy.

HBV reactivation has been reported up to 24 months following completion of rituximab therapy. In patients who develop reactivation of HBV while on RUXIENCE, immediately discontinue RUXIENCE and any concomitant chemotherapy, and institute appropriate treatment. Insufficient data exist regarding the safety of resuming RUXIENCE treatment in patients who develop HBV reactivation.

Resumption of RUXIENCE treatment in patients whose HBV reactivation resolves should be discussed with physicians with expertise in managing HBV.

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML)

JC virus infection resulting in PML and death can occur in rituximab product-treated patients with hematologic malignancies or with autoimmune diseases. The majority of patients with hematologic malignancies diagnosed with PML received rituximab in combination with chemotherapy or as part of a hematopoietic stem cell transplant. The patients with autoimmune diseases had prior or concurrent immunosuppressive therapy.

Most cases of PML were diagnosed within 12 months of their last infusion of rituximab. Consider the diagnosis of PML in any patient presenting with new-onset neurologic manifestations. Evaluation of PML includes, but is not limited to, consultation with a neurologist, brain MRI, and lumbar puncture.

Discontinue RUXIENCE and consider discontinuation or reduction of any concomitant chemotherapy or immunosuppressive therapy in patients who develop PML.

Tumor Lysis Syndrome (TLS)

Acute renal failure, hyperkalemia, hypocalcemia, hyperuricemia, or hyperphosphatemia from tumor lysis, sometimes fatal, can occur within 12–24 hours after the first infusion of rituximab products in patients with NHL. A high number of circulating malignant cells (greater than or equal to 25,000/mm 3 ) or high tumor burden, confers a greater risk of TLS. Administer aggressive intravenous hydration and anti-hyperuricemic therapy in patients at high risk for TLS.

Correct electrolyte abnormalities, monitor renal function and fluid balance, and administer supportive care, including dialysis as indicated.

Infections

Serious, including fatal, bacterial, fungal, and new or reactivated viral infections can occur during and following the completion of rituximab product-based therapy. Infections have been reported in some patients with prolonged hypogammaglobulinemia (defined as hypogammaglobulinemia greater than 11 months after rituximab exposure). New or reactivated viral infections included cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, parvovirus B19, varicella zoster virus, West Nile virus, and hepatitis B and C.

Discontinue RUXIENCE for serious infections and institute appropriate anti-infective therapy. RUXIENCE is not recommended for use in patients with severe, active infections.

Cardiovascular Adverse Reactions

Cardiac adverse reactions, including ventricular fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and cardiogenic shock may occur in patients receiving rituximab products. Discontinue infusions for serious or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias. Perform cardiac monitoring during and after all infusions of RUXIENCE for patients who develop clinically significant arrhythmias, or who have a history of arrhythmia or angina.

Renal Toxicity

Severe, including fatal, renal toxicity can occur after rituximab product administration in patients with NHL. Renal toxicity has occurred in patients who experience tumor lysis syndrome and in patients with NHL administered concomitant cisplatin therapy during clinical trials. The combination of cisplatin and RUXIENCE is not an approved treatment regimen.

Monitor closely for signs of renal failure and discontinue RUXIENCE in patients with a rising serum creatinine or oliguria.

Bowel Obstruction and Perforation

Abdominal pain, bowel obstruction and perforation, in some cases leading to death, can occur in patients receiving rituximab products in combination with chemotherapy. In postmarketing reports, the mean time to documented gastrointestinal perforation was 6 (range 1–77) days in patients with NHL. Evaluate if symptoms of obstruction such as abdominal pain or repeated vomiting occur.

Immunization

The safety of immunization with live viral vaccines following rituximab product therapy has not been studied and vaccination with live virus vaccines is not recommended before or during treatment. For patients treated with RUXIENCE, physicians should review the patient's vaccination status and patients should, if possible, be brought up-to-date with all immunizations in agreement with current immunization guidelines prior to initiating RUXIENCE and administer non live vaccines at least 4 weeks prior to a course of RUXIENCE. The effect of rituximab on immune responses was assessed in a randomized, controlled study in patients with RA treated with rituximab and methotrexate (MTX) compared to patients treated with MTX alone.

A response to pneumococcal vaccination (a T-cell independent antigen) as measured by an increase in antibody titers to at least 6 of 12 serotypes was lower in patients treated with rituximab plus MTX as compared to patients treated with MTX alone (19% vs. 61%). A lower proportion of patients in the rituximab plus MTX group developed detectable levels of anti-keyhole limpet hemocyanin antibodies (a novel protein antigen) after vaccination compared to patients on MTX alone (47% vs. 93%). A positive response to tetanus toxoid vaccine (a T-cell dependent antigen with existing immunity) was similar in patients treated with rituximab plus MTX compared to patients on MTX alone (39% vs. 42%).

The proportion of patients maintaining a positive Candida skin test (to evaluate delayed type hypersensitivity) was also similar (77% of patients on rituximab plus MTX vs. 70% of patients on MTX alone). Most patients in the rituximab-treated group had B-cell counts below the lower limit of normal at the time of immunization. The clinical implications of these findings are not known.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Based on human data, rituximab products can cause fetal harm due to B-cell lymphocytopenia in infants exposed in-utero. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception while receiving RUXIENCE and for 12 months after the last dose.

Concomitant Use with Other Biologic Agents and DMARDS other than Methotrexate in RA, GPA and MPA, PV Limited data are available on the safety of the use of biologic agents or disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) other than methotrexate in RA patients exhibiting peripheral B-cell depletion following treatment with rituximab. Observe patients closely for signs of infection if biologic agents and/or DMARDs are used concomitantly. Use of concomitant immunosuppressants other than corticosteroids has not been studied in GPA or MPA or PV patients exhibiting peripheral B-cell depletion following treatment with rituximab products.

Use in RA Patients Who Have Not Had Prior Inadequate Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Antagonists While the efficacy of rituximab was supported in four controlled trials in patients with RA with prior inadequate responses to non-biologic DMARDs, and in a controlled trial in MTX-naïve patients, a favorable risk-benefit relationship has not been established in these populations. The use of RUXIENCE in patients with RA who have not had prior inadequate response to one or more TNF antagonists is not recommended.

Drug Interactions with Ruxience

Formal drug interaction studies have not been performed with rituximab products. In patients with CLL, rituximab did not alter systemic exposure to fludarabine or cyclophosphamide. In clinical trials of patients with RA, concomitant administration of methotrexate or cyclophosphamide did not alter the pharmacokinetics of rituximab.

Renal toxicity when used in combination with cisplatin.

Pregnancy Safety for Ruxience

Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on human data, rituximab products can cause adverse developmental outcomes including B-cell lymphocytopenia in infants exposed in-utero (see Clinical Considerations ). In animal reproduction studies, intravenous administration of rituximab to pregnant cynomolgus monkeys during the period of organogenesis caused lymphoid B-cell depletion in the newborn offspring at doses resulting in 80% of the exposure (based on AUC) of those achieved following a dose of 2 grams in humans. Advise pregnant women of the risk to a fetus.

Adverse outcomes in pregnancy occur regardless of the health of the mother or the use of medications. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations is unknown. The estimated background risk in the U.S. general population of major birth defects is 2%–4% and of miscarriage is 15%–20% of clinically recognized pregnancies.

Clinical Considerations Fetal/Neonatal Adverse Reactions Observe newborns and infants for signs of infection and manage accordingly. Data Human Data Postmarketing data indicate that B-cell lymphocytopenia generally lasting less than six months can occur in infants exposed to rituximab in-utero. Rituximab was detected postnatally in the serum of infants exposed in-utero.

Animal Data An embryo-fetal developmental toxicity study was performed on pregnant cynomolgus monkeys. Pregnant animals received rituximab via the intravenous route during early gestation (organogenesis period; post coitum Days 20 through 50). Rituximab was administered as loading doses on post coitum (PC) Days mg/kg/day, and then weekly on PC Days mg/kg/week.

The 100 mg/kg/week dose resulted in 80% of the exposure (based on AUC) of those achieved following a dose of 2 grams in humans. Rituximab crosses the monkey placenta. Exposed offspring did not exhibit any teratogenic effects but did have decreased lymphoid tissue B cells.

A subsequent pre- and postnatal reproductive toxicity study in cynomolgus monkeys was completed to assess developmental effects including the recovery of B cells and immune function in infants exposed to rituximab in-utero. Regardless of the timing of treatment, decreased B cells and immunosuppression were noted in the offspring of rituximab-treated pregnant animals. The B-cell counts returned to normal levels, and immunologic function was restored within 6 months postpartum.

Pediatric Use of Ruxience

Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of RUXIENCE have not been established in pediatric patients with NHL, CLL, PV or RA. Rituximab was not studied in pediatric patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (PJIA) due to concerns regarding the potential for prolonged immunosuppression as a result of B-cell depletion in the developing juvenile immune system.

Clinical Studies of Ruxience

Relapsed or Refractory, Low-Grade or Follicular, CD20-Positive, B-Cell NHL The safety and effectiveness of rituximab in relapsed, refractory CD20+ NHL were demonstrated in 3 single-arm studies enrolling 296 patients. Patients with tumor masses greater than 10 cm or with greater than 5,000 lymphocytes/µL in the peripheral blood were excluded from the study. Results are summarized in Table 8.

The median time to onset of response was 50 days. Disease-related signs and symptoms (including B symptoms) resolved in 64% (25/39) of those patients with such symptoms at study entry. All patients had relapsed or refractory, low-grade or follicular, B-cell NHL and had achieved an objective clinical response to rituximab administered 3.8–35.6 months (median 14.5 months) prior to retreatment with rituximab.

Of these 60 patients, 5 received more than one additional course of rituximab. Table 8 Summary of Rituximab NHL Efficacy Data by Schedule and Clinical Setting (Months)

Previously Untreated, Low-Grade or Follicular, CD20-Positive, B-Cell NHL The safety and effectiveness of rituximab in previously untreated, low-grade or follicular, CD20+ NHL were demonstrated in 3 randomized, controlled trials enrolling 1,662 patients. The main outcome measure of the study was progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time from randomization to the first of progression, relapse, or death. Twenty-six percent of the study population was greater than 60 years of age, 99% had Stage III or IV disease, and 50% had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score greater than or equal to 2.

The results for PFS as determined by a blinded, independent assessment of progression are presented in Table 9. The point estimates may be influenced by the presence of informative censoring. The PFS results based on investigator assessment of progression were similar to those obtained by the independent review assessment.

Rituximab was initiated at 8 weeks following completion of chemotherapy. There was a reduction in the risk of progression, relapse, or death (hazard ratio estimate in the range of 0.36 to 0.49) for patients randomized to rituximab as compared to those who received no additional treatment.

Diffuse Large B-Cell NHL (DLBCL)

The safety and effectiveness of rituximab were evaluated in three randomized, active-controlled, open-label, multicenter studies with a collective enrollment of 1,854 patients. Patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell NHL received rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or other anthracycline-based chemotherapy regimens. NHL Study 7 A total of 632 patients age greater than or equal to 60 years with DLBCL (including primary mediastinal B‑cell lymphoma) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to treatment with CHOP or R-CHOP.

Patients received 6 or 8 cycles of CHOP, each cycle lasting 21 days. Patients who received 8 cycles of CHOP also received rituximab prior to Cycle 7. Responding patients underwent a second randomization to receive rituximab or no further therapy.

Efficacy results are presented in Table 10. These results reflect a statistical approach which allows for an evaluation of rituximab administered in the induction setting that excludes any potential impact of rituximab given after the second randomization. Analysis of results after the second randomization in NHL Study 7 demonstrates that for patients randomized to R-CHOP, additional rituximab exposure beyond induction was not associated with further improvements in progression-free survival or overall survival.

All patients received up to eight 3-week cycles of CHOP induction; patients in the R-CHOP arm received rituximab 375 mg/m 2 on Day 1 of each cycle. The main outcome measure of the study was time to treatment failure, defined as time from randomization to the earliest of progressive disease, failure to achieve a complete response, relapse, or death. Patients with follicular NHL received rituximab 375 mg/m 2 plus CVP chemotherapy.

Patients with DLBCL received rituximab 375 mg/m 2 plus CHOP chemotherapy. Patients with clinically significant cardiovascular disease were excluded from the study. All patients were pre-medicated with acetaminophen and an antihistamine and received the glucocorticoid component of their chemotherapy prior to rituximab infusion.

The main outcome measure was the development of Grade 3–4 infusion-related reactions on the day of, or day after, the 90-minute infusion at Cycle 2. Patients who tolerated the 90-minute rituximab infusion at Cycle 2 continued to receive subsequent rituximab infusions at the 90-minute infusion rate for the remainder of the treatment regimen (through Cycle 6 or Cycle 8). No acute fatal infusion-related reactions were observed.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

The safety and effectiveness of rituximab were evaluated in two randomized (1:1) multicenter open-label studies comparing FC alone or in combination with rituximab for up to 6 cycles in patients with previously untreated CLL or previously treated CLL. In both studies, seventy-one percent of CLL patients received 6 cycles and 90% received at least 3 cycles of rituximab-based therapy. The investigator assessed results in CLL Study 2 were supportive of those obtained by the independent review committee.

Efficacy results are presented in Table 11. The results of exploratory subset analyses in elderly patients are presented in Table 12. Table 12 Efficacy Results in CLL Studies 1 and 2 in Subgroups Defined by Age From exploratory analyses. 1.22

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Reducing the Signs and Symptoms: Initial and Retreatment Courses The efficacy and safety of rituximab were evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of adult patients with moderately-to-severely-active RA who had a prior inadequate response to at least one TNF inhibitor. Patients were 18 years of age or older, diagnosed with active RA according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, and had at least 8 swollen and 8 tender joints. Further courses of rituximab 2 × 1,000 mg + MTX were administered in an open‑label extension study at a frequency determined by clinical evaluation, but no sooner than 16 weeks after the preceding course of rituximab.

In addition to the intravenous premedication, glucocorticoids were administered orally on a tapering schedule from baseline through Day 14. In RA Study 2 (NCT00266227), all patients received the first course of rituximab 2 × 1,000 mg + MTX. Patients who experienced ongoing disease activity were randomized to receive a second course of either rituximab 2 × 1,000 mg + MTX or placebo + MTX, the majority between Weeks 24–28.

Table 13 ACR Responses in RA Study 1 and RA Study 2 (Percent of Patients) (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population) Improvement was also noted for all components of ACR response following treatment with rituximab, as shown in Table 14. Although both treatment groups received a brief course of intravenous and oral glucocorticoids, resulting in similar benefits at Week 4, higher ACR 20 responses were observed for the rituximab group by Week 8. A similar proportion of patients achieved these responses through Week 24 after a single course of treatment (2 infusions) with rituximab.

Similar patterns were demonstrated for ACR 50 and 70 responses. RA Study 1 (Inadequate Response to TNF Antagonists) The same patients may not have responded at each time point. Figure 2 Radiographic Response In RA Study 1, structural joint damage was assessed radiographically and expressed as changes in Genant-modified Total Sharp Score (TSS) and its components, the erosion score (ES) and the joint space narrowing (JSN) score.

Rituximab + MTX slowed the progression of structural damage compared to placebo + MTX after 1 year as shown in Table 15. As shown in Table 15, progression of structural damage in rituximab + MTX patients was further reduced in the second year of treatment. Following 2 years of treatment with rituximab + MTX, 57% of patients had no progression of structural damage.

During the first year, 60% of rituximab + MTX treated patients had no progression, defined as a change in TSS of zero or less compared to baseline, compared to 46% of placebo + MTX treated patients. In their second year of treatment with rituximab + MTX, more patients had no progression than in the first year (68% vs. 60%), and 87% of the rituximab + MTX treated patients who had no progression in the first year also had no progression in the second year. Patients received a first course of two infusions of rituximab or placebo on Days 1 and 15.

MTX was initiated at 7.5 mg/week and escalated up to 20 mg/week by Week 8 in all three treatment arms. After a minimum of 24 weeks, patients with ongoing disease activity were eligible to receive retreatment with additional courses of their assigned treatment. After one year of treatment, the proportion of patients achieving ACR 20/50/70 responses were similar in both rituximab dose groups and were higher than in the placebo group.

However, with respect to radiographic scores, only the rituximab 1,000 mg treatment group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in TSS: a change of 0.36 units compared to 1.08 units for the placebo group, a 67% reduction. Physical Function Response RA Study 4 (NCT00299130) is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult RA patients with moderately-to-severely-active disease with inadequate response to MTX. Patients were randomized to receive an initial course of rituximab 500 mg, rituximab 1,000 mg, or placebo in addition to background MTX.

Physical function was assessed at Weeks 24 and 48 using the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). From baseline to Week 24, a greater proportion of rituximab-treated patients had an improvement in HAQ-DI of at least 0.22 (a minimal clinically important difference) and a greater mean HAQ-DI improvement compared to placebo, as shown in Table 16. HAQ-DI results for the rituximab 500 mg treatment group were similar to the rituximab 1,000 mg treatment group; however radiographic responses were not assessed (see Dosing Precaution in the Radiographic Responses section above).

These improvements were maintained at 48 weeks. Table 16 Improvement from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (GPA) (Wegener's Granulomatosis) and Microscopic Polyangiitis (MPA) Induction Treatment of Adult Patients with Active Disease (GPA/MPA Study 1) A total of 197 patients with active, severe GPA and MPA (two forms of ANCA‑Associated Vasculitides) were treated in a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled multicenter, non-inferiority study, conducted in two phases – a 6-month remission induction phase and a 12-month remission maintenance phase. Patients were 15 years of age or older, diagnosed with GPA (75% of patients) or MPA (24% of patients) according to the Chapel Hill Consensus conference criteria (1% of the patients had unknown vasculitis type). All patients had active disease, with a Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score for Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis (BVAS/GPA) greater than or equal to 3, and their disease was severe, with at least one major item on the BVAS/GPA.

Ninety-six (49%) of patients had new disease and 101 (51%) of patients had relapsing disease. Following intravenous corticosteroid administration, all patients received oral prednisone (1 mg/kg/day, not exceeding 80 mg/day) with pre-specified tapering. Once remission was achieved or at the end of the 6-month remission induction period, the cyclophosphamide group received azathioprine to maintain remission.

The rituximab group did not receive additional therapy to maintain remission. The main outcome measure for both GPA and MPA patients was achievement of complete remission at 6 months defined as a BVAS/GPA of 0, and off glucocorticoid therapy. The pre-specified non-inferiority margin was a treatment difference of 20%.

As shown in Table 17, the study demonstrated non-inferiority of rituximab to cyclophosphamide for complete remission at 6 months. Retreatment of Flares with Rituximab Based upon investigator judgment, 15 patients received a second course of rituximab therapy for treatment of relapse of disease activity which occurred between 8 and 17 months after the induction treatment course of rituximab. Follow up Treatment of Adult Patients with GPA/MPA who have achieved disease control with other Immunosuppressant (GPA/MPA Study 2) A total of 115 patients (86 with GPA, 24 with MPA, and 5 with renal-limited ANCA-associated vasculitis) in disease remission were randomized to receive azathioprine (58 patients) or non-U.S.-licensed rituximab (57 patients) in this open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized, active-controlled study.

Eligible patients were 21 years and older and had either newly diagnosed (80%) or relapsing disease (20%). A majority of the patients were ANCA-positive. Remission of active disease was achieved using a combination of glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide.

Within a maximum of 1 month after the last cyclophosphamide dose, eligible patients (based on BVAS of 0), were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either non-U.S.-licensed rituximab or azathioprine. Prednisone treatment was tapered and then kept at a low dose (approximately 5 mg per day) for at least 18 months after randomization. Prednisone dose tapering and the decision to stop prednisone treatment after Month 18 were left at the investigator's discretion.

Planned follow-up was until Month 28 (10 or 6 months, respectively, after the last non-U.S.-licensed rituximab infusion or azathioprine dose). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of major relapse (defined by the reappearance of clinical and/or laboratory signs of vasculitis activity that could lead to organ failure or damage, or could be life-threatening) through Month 28. The observed cumulative incidence rate of first major relapse during the 28 months was lower in patients on non-U.S.-licensed rituximab relative to azathioprine (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Cumulative Incidence Over Time of First Major Relapse in Patients with GPA/MPA Image 3

Pemphigus Vulgaris (PV) PV Study 1 (NCT00784589)

Non-U.S.-licensed rituximab in combination with short-term prednisone was compared to prednisone monotherapy as first-line treatment in 90 newly diagnosed adult patients with moderate to severe pemphigus (74 Pemphigus Vulgaris and 16 Pemphigus Foliaceus ) in this randomized, open-label, controlled, multicenter study (PV Study 1). Patients were between 19 and 79 years of age and had not received prior therapies for pemphigus. Patients were stratified by baseline disease severity (moderate or severe) and randomized 1:1 to receive either the non-U.S.-licensed rituximab and short-term prednisone or long-term prednisone monotherapy.

Patients were pre-medicated with antihistamine, acetaminophen and methylprednisolone prior to infusion of the non-U.S.-licensed rituximab. Patients randomized to the group treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab received an initial intravenous infusion of 1,000 mg non-U.S.-licensed rituximab on Study Day 1 in combination with a short-term regimen of 0.5 mg/kg/day oral prednisone tapered off over 3 months if they had moderate disease or 1 mg/kg/day oral prednisone tapered off over 6 months if they had severe disease. All patients received a second intravenous infusion of 1,000 mg non-U.S.-licensed rituximab on Study Day 15.

Maintenance infusions of 500 mg non-U.S.-licensed rituximab were administered at Months 12 and 18. Patients randomized to the prednisone monotherapy group received an initial 1 mg/kg/day oral prednisone tapered off over 12 months if they had moderate disease or 1.5 mg/kg/day oral prednisone tapered off over 18 months if they had severe disease. Patients in the group treated with non-U.S.-licensed rituximab who relapsed could receive an additional infusion of 1,000 mg non-U.S.-licensed rituximab in combination with reintroduced or escalated prednisone dose.

Maintenance and relapse infusions were administered no sooner than 16 weeks following the previous infusion. The primary endpoint for the study was complete remission (complete epithelialization and absence of new and/or established lesions) at Month 24 without the use of prednisone therapy for 2 months or more (CRoff for greater than or equal to 2 months). The results of the trial are presented in Table 18.

Table 18 Percentage of Pemphigus Patients in Complete Remission Off Corticosteroid Therapy for Two Months or More (CRoff greater than or equal to 2 months) at Month 24, PV Study 1 (Intent-to-Treat Population) PV Study 2 (NCT02383589) In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator, multicenter study, the efficacy and safety of rituximab compared to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were evaluated in patients with moderate to severe PV receiving 60-120 mg/day oral prednisone or equivalent (1.0-1.5 mg/kg/day) at study entry and tapered to reach a dose of 60 or 80 mg/day by Day 1. Patients had a confirmed diagnosis of PV within the previous 24 months and evidence of moderate to severe disease defined as a total Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) activity score of greater than or equal to 15. The study consisted of a screening period of up to 28 days, a 52-week double-blind treatment period, and a 48-week safety follow up period.

Randomization was stratified by duration of PV (within the 1 year prior to screening or greater than 1 year) and geographical region. A dual-assessor approach was used during the study for efficacy and safety evaluations to prevent potential unblinding. One hundred and twenty-five patients (excluding exploratory data from ten telemedicine patients) were analyzed for efficacy (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population).

The primary efficacy endpoint for this study was the proportion of subjects achieving sustained complete remission defined as achieving healing of lesions with no new active lesions (i.e., PDAI activity score of 0) while on 0 mg/day prednisone or equivalent, and maintaining this response for at least 16 consecutive weeks, during the 52-week treatment period. Secondary endpoints included cumulative oral corticosteroid dose and the total number of disease flares. The results of the trial are presented in Table 19.

Table 19 Percentage of PV Patients Who Achieved Sustained Complete Remission Off Corticosteroid Therapy for 16 Weeks or More at Week 52 (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population) Glucocorticoid Exposure The median (min, max) cumulative oral prednisone dose at Week in the rituximab group compared to 4,005 mg (900; 19,920) in the MMF group. Topical corticosteroid use and pre-infusion IV methylprednisolone were not included in this analysis. Prior to each infusion, the rituximab group received IV methylprednisolone 100 mg and the MMF group received IV saline solution.

Disease Flare Disease flare was defined as an appearance of 3 or more new lesions a month that do not heal spontaneously within 1 week or by the extension of established lesions in a patient who has achieved disease control. The total number of disease flares was lower in patients treated with rituximab compared to MMF (6 vs. 44).

Table 8 Summary of Rituximab NHL Efficacy Data by Schedule and Clinical Setting
NHL Study 1 Weekly × 4 N=166NHL Study 2 Weekly × 8 N=37NHL Study 1 and NHL Study 3 Bulky disease, Weekly × 4 N=39 Six of these patients are included in the first column. Thus, data from 296 intent-to-treat patients are provided in this table.NHL Study 3 Retreatment, Weekly × 4 N=60
Overall Response Rate48%57%36%38%
Complete Response Rate6%14%3%10%
Median Duration of Response Kaplan-Meier projected with observed range., "+" indicates an ongoing response., Duration of response: interval from the onset of response to disease progression.11.213.46.915.0
(Months) [Range][1.9 to 42.1+][2.5 to 36.5+][2.8 to 25.0+][3.0 to 25.1+]
Table 9 Efficacy Results in NHL Study 4
Study Arm
R-CVP N=162CVP N=160
Median PFS (years) p <0.0001, two-sided stratified log-rank test.2.41.4
Hazard ratio (95% CI) Estimates of Cox regression stratified by center.0.44 (0.29, 0.65)
Table 10 Efficacy Results in NHL Studies 7, 8, and 9
NHL Study 7 (n=632)NHL Study 8 (n=399)NHL Study 9 (n=823)
R-CHOPCHOPR-CHOPCHOPR-ChemoChemo
Main outcomeProgression-free survival (years)Event-free survival (years)Time to treatment failure (years)
Median of main outcome measure3.11.62.91.1NE NE=Not reliably estimable.NE
Hazard ratio R-CHOP vs. CHOP.0.69 Significant at p <0.05, 2-sided.0.600.45
Overall survival at 2 years Kaplan-Meier estimates.74%63%69%58%95%86%
Hazard ratio0.720.680.40
Table 11 Efficacy Results in CLL Studies 1 and 2
CLL Study 1 As defined in 1996 National Cancer Institute Working Group guidelines. (Previously untreated)CLL Study 2 (Previously treated)
R-FC N=408FC N=409R-FC N=276FC N=276
Median PFS (months)39.831.526.721.7
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.56 (0.43, 0.71)0.76 (0.6, 0.96)
P value (Log-Rank test)<0.010.02
Response rate86%73%54%45%
(95% CI)(82, 89)(68, 77)(48, 60)(37, 51)
Table 12 Efficacy Results in CLL Studies 1 and 2 in Subgroups Defined by Age From exploratory analyses.
Age subgroupCLL Study 1CLL Study 2
Number of PatientsHazard Ratio for PFS (95% CI)Number of PatientsHazard Ratio for PFS (95% CI)
Age less than 65 yrs5720.52 (0.39, 0.70)3130.61 (0.45, 0.84)
Age greater than or equal to 65 yrs2450.62 (0.39, 0.99)2330.99 (0.70, 1.40)
Age less than 70 yrs7360.51 (0.39, 0.67)4380.67 (0.51, 0.87)
Age greater than or equal to 70 yrs811.17 (0.51, 2.66)1081.22 (0.73, 2.04)
Table 13 ACR Responses in RA Study 1 and RA Study 2 (Percent of Patients) (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)
Inadequate Response to TNF Antagonists
RA Study 1 24 Week Placebo-Controlled (Week 24)RA Study 2 Placebo-Controlled Retreatment (Week 24 and Week 48)
ResponsePlacebo + MTX n=201Rituximab + MTX n=298Treatment Difference (Rituximab – Placebo) For RA Study 1, weighted difference stratified by region (US, rest of the world) and Rheumatoid Factor (RF) status (positive greater than 20 IU/mL, negative less than 20 IU/mL) at baseline; For RA Study 2, weighted difference stratified by RF status at baseline and greater than or equal to 20% improvement from baseline in both SJC and TJC at Week 24 (Yes/No). (95% CI)ResponsePlacebo + MTX Retreatment n=157Rituximab + MTX Retreatment n=318Treatment Difference (Rituximab – Placebo) In RA Study 2, all patients received a first course of rituximab 2 × 1,000 mg. Patients who experienced ongoing disease activity were randomized to receive a second course of either rituximab 2 × 1,000 mg + MTX or Placebo + MTX at or after Week 24., Since all patients received a first course of rituximab, no comparison between Placebo + MTX and rituximab + MTX is made at Week 24., (95% CI)
ACR20ACR20
Week 2418%51%33% (26%, 41%)Week 2448%45%NA
Week 4845%54%11% (2%, 20%)
ACR50ACR50
Week 245%27%21% (15%, 27%)Week 2427%21%NA
Week 4826%29%4% (-4%, 13%)
ACR70ACR70
Week 241%12%11% (7%, 15%)Week 2411%8%NA
Week 4813%14%1% (-5%, 8%)
Table 14 Components of ACR Response at Week 24 in RA Study 1 (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)
Inadequate Response to TNF Antagonists
Placebo + MTX (n=201)Rituximab + MTX (n=298)
Parameter (median)BaselineWk 24BaselineWk 24
Tender Joint Count31.027.033.013.0
Swollen Joint Count20.019.021.09.5
Physician Global Assessment Visual Analog Scale: 0=best, 100=worst.71.069.071.036.0
Patient Global Assessment73.068.071.041.0
Pain68.068.067.038.5
Disability Index (HAQ) Disability Index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire: 0=best, 3=worst.2.01.91.91.5
CRP (mg/dL)2.42.52.60.9
Table 15 Mean Radiographic Change from Baseline to 104 Weeks in RA Study 1
Inadequate Response to TNF Antagonists
ParameterRituximab 2 × 1,000 mg + MTX Patients received up to 2 years of treatment with rituximab + MTX.Placebo + MTX Patients receiving Placebo + MTX. Patients receiving Placebo + MTX could have received retreatment with rituximab + MTX from Week 16 onward.Treatment Difference (Placebo – Rituximab)95% CI
Change during First Year
TSS0.661.771.11(0.47, 1.75)
ES0.441.190.75(0.32, 1.19)
JSN Score0.220.580.36(0.10, 0.62)
Change during Second Year Based on radiographic scoring following 104 weeks of observation.
TSS0.481.04——
ES0.280.62——
JSN Score0.200.42——
Table 16 Improvement from Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 24 in RA Study 4
Placebo + MTX n=172Rituximab 2 × 1,000 mg + MTX n=170Treatment Difference (Rituximab - Placebo) Adjusted difference stratified by region (US, rest of the world) and Rheumatoid Factor (RF) status (positive greater than or equal to 20 IU/mL, negative less than 20 IU/mL) at baseline. (95% CI)
Mean Improvement from Baseline0.190.420.23 (0.11, 0.34)
Percent of patients with "Improved" score (Change from Baseline greater than or equal to MCID) Minimal Clinically Important Difference: MCID for HAQ=0.22.48%58%11% (0%, 21%)
Table 17 Percentage of Patients with GPA/MPA Who Achieved Complete Remission at 6 Months (Intent-to-Treat Population)
Rituximab (n=99)Cyclophosphamide (n=98)Treatment Difference (Rituximab – Cyclophosphamide)
Rate64%53%11%
95.1% The 95.1% confidence level reflects an additional 0.001 alpha to account for an interim efficacy analysis. CI(54%, 73%)(43%, 63%)(-3%, 24%) Non-inferiority was demonstrated because the lower bound was higher than the prespecified non-inferiority margin (-3% greater than -20%).
Table 18 Percentage of Pemphigus Patients in Complete Remission Off Corticosteroid Therapy for Two Months or More (CRoff greater than or equal to 2 months) at Month 24, PV Study 1 (Intent-to-Treat Population)
Non-U.S.-Licensed Rituximab + Short-term Prednisone N=46Prednisone N=44
Number of responders (response rate [%])41 (89%)15 (34%)
PV patients34/38 (90%)10/36 (28%)
PF patients7/8 (88%)5/8 (63%)
Table 19 Percentage of PV Patients Who Achieved Sustained Complete Remission Off Corticosteroid Therapy for 16 Weeks or More at Week 52 (Modified Intent-to-Treat Population)
MMF = Mycophenolate mofetil. CI = Confidence Interval.
Rituximab (N=62)MMF (N=63)Difference (95% CI)
Number of responders (response rate [%])25 (40.3%)6 (9.5%)30.80% (14.70%, 45.15%)

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Ruxience?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Ruxience Prices