Paclitaxel Drug Information
Generic name: PACLITAXEL
Microtubule Inhibitor [EPC]
Uses of Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel Injection, USP is indicated as subsequent therapy for the treatment of advanced carcinoma of the ovary. As first-line therapy, Paclitaxel Injection, USP is indicated in combination with cisplatin. Paclitaxel Injection, USP is indicated for the adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer administered sequentially to standard doxorubicin-containing combination chemotherapy.
In the clinical trial, there was an overall favorable effect on disease-free and overall survival in the total population of patients with receptor-positive and receptor-negative tumors, but the benefit has been specifically demonstrated by available data (median follow-up 30 months) only in the patients with estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative tumors (see CLINICAL STUDIES, Breast Carcinoma ). Paclitaxel Injection, USP is indicated for the treatment of breast cancer after failure of combination chemotherapy for metastatic disease or relapse within 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy. Prior therapy should have included an anthracycline unless clinically contraindicated.
Paclitaxel Injection, USP is indicated for the second-line treatment of AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma.
Dosage & Administration of Paclitaxel
Note: Contact of the undiluted concentrate with plasticized PVC equipment or devices used to prepare solutions for infusion is not recommended. In order to minimize patient exposure to the plasticizer DEHP, which may be leached from PVC infusion bags or sets, diluted paclitaxel solutions should be stored in bottles (glass, polypropylene) or plastic bags (polypropylene, polyolefin) and administered through polyethylene-lined administration sets. All patients should be premedicated prior to paclitaxel administration in order to prevent severe hypersensitivity reactions.
For patients with carcinoma of the ovary the following regimen is recommended (see CLINICAL STUDIES, Ovarian Carcinoma ): For previously untreated patients with carcinoma of the ovary, one of the following recommended regimens may be given every 3 weeks. In selecting the appropriate regimen, differences in toxicities should be considered (see TABLE 11 in ADVERSE REACTIONS, Disease-Specific Adverse Event Experiences). In patients previously treated with chemotherapy for carcinoma of the ovary, paclitaxel has been used at several doses and schedules; however, the optimal regimen is not yet clear (See CLINICAL STUDIES, Ovarian Carcinoma ).
The recommended regimen is paclitaxel administered intravenously over 3 hours every 3 weeks. The clinical trial used 4 courses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (see CLINICAL STUDIES, Breast Carcinoma ). In addition, all patients with low performance status were treated with the latter schedule (100 mg/m 2 every 2 weeks).
Based upon the immunosuppression in patients with advanced HIV disease, the following modifications are recommended in these patients: Reduce the dose of dexamethasone as 1 of the 3 premedication drugs to 10 mg PO (instead of 20 mg PO); Initiate or repeat treatment with paclitaxel only if the neutrophil count is at least 1,000 cells/mm 3; Reduce the dose of subsequent courses of paclitaxel by 20% for patients who experience severe neutropenia (neutrophil <500 cells/mm 3 for a week or longer); and Initiate concomitant hematopoietic growth factor (G-CSF) as clinicallyindicated. For the therapy of patients with solid tumors (ovary, breast and NSCLC), courses of paclitaxel should not be repeated until the neutrophil count is at least 1,500 cells/mm 3 and the platelet count is at least 100,000 cells/mm 3. Paclitaxel should not be given to patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma if the baseline or subsequent neutrophil count is less than 1,000 cells/mm 3.
Patients who experience severe neutropenia (neutrophil <500 cells/mm 3 for a week or longer) or severe peripheral neuropathy during paclitaxel therapy should have dosage reduced by 20% for subsequent courses of paclitaxel. The incidence of neurotoxicity and the severity of neutropenia increase with dose. Preparation and Administration Precautions Paclitaxel is a cytotoxic anticancer drug and, as with other potentially toxic compounds, caution should be exercised in handling paclitaxel.
The use of gloves is recommended. If paclitaxel solution contacts the skin, wash the skin immediately and thoroughly with soap and water. Following topical exposure, events have included tingling, burning and redness.
If paclitaxel contacts mucous membranes, the membranes should be flushed thoroughly with water. Upon inhalation, dyspnea, chest pain, burning eyes, sore throat, and nausea have been reported. Hepatic Impairment Patients with hepatic impairment may be at increased risk of toxicity, particularly grade III–IV myelosuppression (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY and PRECAUTIONS, Hepatic ).
Recommendations for dosage adjustment for the first course of therapy are shown in TABLE 17 for both 3- and 24-hour infusions. Further dose reduction in subsequent courses should be based on individual tolerance. Patients should be monitored closely for the development of profound myelosuppression.
TABLE 17. Preparation and Administration Precautions Procedures for proper handling and disposal of anticancer drugs should be considered. Several guidelines on this subject have been published. 1-4 To minimize the risk of dermal exposure, always wear impervious gloves when handling vials containing paclitaxel Injection.
Given the possibility of extravasation, it is advisable to closely monitor the infusion site for possible infiltration during drug administration. (See PRECAUTIONS, Injection Site Reaction ). Preparation for Intravenous Administration Paclitaxel must be diluted prior to infusion. The solutions are physically and chemically stable for up to 27 hours at ambient temperature (approximately 25°C) and room lighting conditions.
Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration whenever solution and container permit. Upon preparation, solutions may show haziness, which is attributed to the formulation vehicle. No significant losses in potency have been noted following simulated delivery of the solution through I.V. tubing containing an in-line (0.22 micron) filter.
Data collected for the presence of the extractable plasticizer DEHP show that levels increase with time and concentration when dilutions are prepared in PVC containers. Consequently, the use of plasticized PVC containers and administration sets is not recommended. Paclitaxel solutions should be prepared and stored in glass, polypropylene, or polyolefin containers.
Non-PVC containing administration sets, such as those which are polyethylene-lined, should be used. Paclitaxel should be administered through an in-line filter with a microporous membrane not greater than 0.22 microns. Use of filter devices such as IVEX-2® filters which incorporate short inlet and outlet PVC-coated tubing has not resulted in significant leaching of DEHP.
The Chemo Dispensing Pin™ device or similar devices with spikes should not be used with vials of paclitaxel since they can cause the stopper to collapse resulting in loss of sterile integrity of the paclitaxel solution. Stability Unopened vials of paclitaxel are stable until the date indicated on the package when stored between 20° to 25°C (68° to 77°F), in the original package. Neither freezing nor refrigeration adversely affects the stability of the product.
Upon refrigeration components in the paclitaxel vial may precipitate, but will redissolve upon reaching room temperature with little or no agitation. There is no impact on product quality under these circumstances. If the solution remains cloudy or if an insoluble precipitate is noted, the vial should be discarded.
Solutions for infusion prepared as recommended are stable at ambient temperature (approximately 25°C) and lighting conditions for up to 27 hours.
| Degree of Hepatic Impairment | Recommended Paclitaxel Dose c |
|---|---|
| Transaminase Bilirubin Levels b Levels | |
| 24-Hour Infusion | |
| <2 x ULN and ≤1.5 mg/dL | 135 mg/m 2 |
| 2 to <10 x ULN and ≤1.5 mg/dL | 100 mg/m 2 |
| <10 x ULN and 1.6 to 7.5 mg/dL | 50 mg/m 2 |
| ≥10 x ULN or >7.5 mg/dL | Not recommended |
| 3-Hour Infusion | |
| <10 x ULN and ≤1.25 x ULN | 175 mg/m 2 |
| <10 x ULN and 1.26 to 2 x ULN | 135 mg/m 2 |
| <10 x ULN and 2.01 to 5 x ULN | 90 mg/m 2 |
| ≥10 x ULN or >5.0 x ULN | Not recommended |
Side Effects of Paclitaxel
Pooled Analysis of Adverse Event Experiences from Single-Agent Studies Data in the following table are based on the experience of 812 patients (493 with ovarian carcinoma and 319 with breast carcinoma) enrolled in 10 studies who received single-agent Paclitaxel Injection. TABLE 10. SUMMARY a OF ADVERSE EVENTS IN PATIENTS WITH SOLID TUMORS RECEIVING SINGLE-AGENT Paclitaxel a Based on worst course analysis. b All patients received premedication. c During the first 3 hours of infusion Severe events are defined as at least Grade III toxicity.
None of the observed toxicities were clearly influenced by age. Disease-Specific Adverse Event Experiences First-Line Ovary in Combination For the 1,084 patients who were evaluable for safety in the Phase 3 first-line ovary combination therapy studies, TABLE 11 shows the incidence of important adverse events. For both studies, the analysis of safety was based on all courses of therapy (6 courses for the GOG- 111 study and up to 9 courses for the Intergroup study).
TABLE 11. FREQUENCY a OF IMPORTANT ADVERSE EVENTS IN THE PHASE 3 FIRST-LINE OVARIAN CARCINOMA STUDIES 6 8 a Based on worst course analysis. b Paclitaxel (T) dose in mg/m 2 /infusion duration in hours. c Cyclophosphamide (C) or cisplatin (c) dose in mg/m 2. d p<0.05 by Fisher exact test. e <130,000/mm 3 in the Intergroup study. f <12 g/dL in the Intergroup study. g All patients received premedication. h In the GOG-111 study, neurotoxicity was collected as peripheral neuropathy and in the Intergroup study, neurotoxicity was collected as either neuromotor or neurosensory symptoms. Severe events are defined as at least Grade III toxicity. NC Not Collected.
Second-Line Ovary: For the 403 patients who received single-agent paclitaxel injection in the Phase 3 second-line ovarian carcinoma study, the following table shows the incidence of important adverse events. TABLE 12. Myelosuppression was dose and schedule related, with the schedule effect being more prominent.
The development of severe hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) was rare; 1% of the patients and 0.2% of the courses overall. There was no apparent dose or schedule effect seen for the HSRs. Peripheral neuropathy was clearly dose-related, but schedule did not appear to affect the incidence.
Adjuvant Breast For the Phase 3 adjuvant breast carcinoma study, the following table shows the incidence of important severe adverse events for the 3121 patients (total population) who were evaluable for safety as well as for a group of 325 patients (early population) who, per the study protocol, were monitored more intensively than other patients. TABLE 13. The incidence of an adverse event for the total population likely represents an underestimation of the actual incidence given that safety data were collected differently based on enrollment cohort.
However, since safety data were collected consistently across regimens, the safety of the sequential addition of paclitaxel following AC therapy may be compared with AC therapy alone. During the additional 4 courses of treatment with paclitaxel, 2 deaths (0.1%) were attributed to treatment. The incidences of severe hematologic toxicities, infections, mucositis, and cardiovascular events increased with higher doses of doxorubicin.
Breast Cancer After Failure of Initial Chemotherapy For the 458 patients who received single-agent paclitaxel in the Phase 3 breast carcinoma study, the following table shows the incidence of important adverse events by treatment arm (each arm was administered by a 3-hour infusion). TABLE 14. FREQUENCY a OF IMPORTANT ADVERSE EVENTS IN THE PHASE 3 STUDY OF BREAST CANCER AFTER FAILURE OF INITIAL CHEMOTHERAPY OR WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY a Based on worst course analysis. b Paclitaxel dose in mg/m 2 /infusion duration in hours. c All patients received premedication. Severe events are defined as at least Grade III toxicity.
Myelosuppression and peripheral neuropathy were dose related. There was one severe hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) observed at the dose of 135 mg/m 2. TABLE 15.
FREQUENCY a OF IMPORTANT ADVERSE EVENTS IN THE PHASE 3 STUDY FOR FIRST-LINE NSCLC a Based on worst course analysis. b Paclitaxel (T) dose in mg/m 2 /infusion duration in hours; cisplatin (c) dose in mg/m 2. c Paclitaxel dose in mg/m 2 /infusion duration in hours with G-CSF support; cisplatin dose in mg/m 2. d Etoposide (VP) dose in mg/m 2 was administered IV on days 1, 2, and 3; cisplatin dose in mg/m 2. e p<0.05. f All patients received premedication Severe events are defined as at least Grade III toxicity. Toxicity was generally more severe in the high-dose paclitaxel treatment arm (T250/c75) than in the low-dose paclitaxel arm (T135/c75). Compared to the cisplatin/etoposide arm, patients in the low-dose paclitaxel arm experienced more arthralgia/myalgia of any grade and more severe neutropenia.
The incidence of febrile neutropenia was not reported in this study. Kaposi’s Sarcoma The following table shows the frequency of important adverse events in the 85 patients with KS treated with 2 different single-agent paclitaxel regimens. TABLE 16.
FREQUENCY a OF IMPORTANT ADVERSE EVENTS IN THE AIDS-RELATED KAPOSI’S SARCOMA STUDIES a Based on worst course analysis. b Paclitaxel dose in mg/m 2 /infusion duration in hours. c All patients received premedication. Severe events are defined as at least Grade III toxicity. The differences between the 2 studies with respect to dose escalation and use of hematopoietic growth factors, as described above, should be taken into account. (See CLINICAL STUDIES, AIDS-Related Kaposi’s Sarcoma ). Note also that only 26% of the 85 patients in these studies received concomitant treatment with protease inhibitors, whose effect on paclitaxel metabolism has not yet been studied.
Adverse Event Experiences by Body System The following discussion refers to the overall safety database of 812 patients with solid tumors treated with single-agent paclitaxel in clinical studies. Toxicities that occurred with greater severity or frequency in previously untreated patients with ovarian carcinoma or NSCLC who received paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin or in patients with breast cancer who received paclitaxel after doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide in the adjuvant setting and that occurred with a difference that was clinically significant in these populations are also described. The frequency and severity of important adverse events for the Phase 3 ovarian carcinoma, breast carcinoma, NSCLC, and the Phase 2 Kaposi’s sarcoma carcinoma studies are presented above in tabular form by treatment arm.
In addition, rare events have been reported from postmarketing experience or from other clinical studies. The frequency and severity of adverse events have been generally similar for patients receiving paclitaxel for the treatment of ovarian, breast, or lung carcinoma or Kaposi’s sarcoma, but patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma may have more frequent and severe hematologic toxicity, infections (including opportunistic infections, see TABLE 16 ), and febrile neutropenia. These patients require a lower dose intensity and supportive care. (See CLINICAL STUDIES, AIDS-Related Kaposi’s Sarcoma ).
Toxicities that were observed only in or were noted to have occurred with greater severity in the population with Kaposi’s sarcoma and that occurred with a difference that was clinically significant in this population are described. Elevated liver function tests and renal toxicity have a higher incidence in KS patients as compared to patients with solid tumors. Hematologic Bone marrow suppression was the major dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel.
Neutropenia, the most important hematologic toxicity, was dose and schedule dependent and was generally rapidly reversible. In the same study, severe neutropenia (<500 cells/mm 3 ) was more frequent with the 24-hour than with the 3-hour infusion; infusion duration had a greater impact on myelosuppression than dose. Neutropenia did not appear to increase with cumulative exposure and did not appear to be more frequent nor more severe for patients previously treated with radiation therapy.
In the study where paclitaxel was administered to patients with ovarian carcinoma at a dose of 135 mg/m 2 /24 hours in combination with cisplatin versus the control arm of cyclophosphamide plus cisplatin, the incidences of grade IV neutropenia and of febrile neutropenia were significantly greater in the paclitaxel plus cisplatin arm than in the control arm. On the paclitaxel/cisplatin arm, there were 35/1074 (3%) courses with fever in which Grade IV neutropenia was reported at some time during the course. Fever was frequent (12% of all treatment courses).
Infectious episodes occurred in 30% of all patients and 9% of all courses; these episodes were fatal in 1% of all patients, and included sepsis, pneumonia and peritonitis. In the Phase 3 second-line ovarian study, infectious episodes were reported in 20% and 26% of the patients treated with a dose of given as a 3-hour infusion respectively. Urinary tract infections and upper respiratory tract infections were the most frequently reported infectious complications.
In the immunosuppressed patient population with advanced HIV disease and poor-risk AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma, 61% of the patients reported at least one opportunistic infection. (See CLINICAL STUDIES, AIDS-Related Kaposi’s Sarcoma ). The use of supportive therapy, including G-CSF, is recommended for patients who have experienced severe neutropenia. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ). Thrombocytopenia was reported.
Bleeding episodes were reported in 4% of all courses and by 14% of all patients, but most of the hemorrhagic episodes were localized and the frequency of these events was unrelated to the paclitaxel dose and schedule. In the Phase 3 second-line ovarian study, bleeding episodes were reported in 10% of the patients; no patients treated with the 3- hour infusion received platelet transfusions. In the adjuvant breast carcinoma trial, the incidence of severe thrombocytopenia and platelet transfusions increased with higher doses of doxorubicin.
No consistent relationship between dose or schedule and the frequency of anemia was observed. Among all patients with normal baseline hemoglobin, 69% became anemic on study but only 7% had severe anemia. Red cell transfusions were required in 25% of all patients and in 12% of those with normal baseline hemoglobin levels.
Hypersensitivity Reactions (HSRs) All patients received premedication prior to paclitaxel administration (see WARNINGS and PRECAUTIONS, Hypersensitivity Reactions ). The frequency and severity of HSRs were not affected by the dose or schedule of paclitaxel administration. In the Phase 3 second-line ovarian study, the 3-hour infusion was not associated with a greater increase in HSRs when compared to the 24-hour infusion.
Hypersensitivity reactions were observed in 20% of all courses and in 41% of all patients. These reactions were severe in less than 2% of the patients and 1% of the courses. No severe reactions were observed after course 3 and severe symptoms occurred generally within the first hour of paclitaxel infusion.
The most frequent symptoms observed during these severe reactions were dyspnea, flushing, chest pain, and tachycardia. Abdominal pain, pain in the extremities, diaphoresis, and hypertension were also noted. The frequency of hypersensitivity reactions remained relatively stable during the entire treatment period.
Chills, shock, and back pain in association with hypersensitivity reactions have been reported. Cardiovascular Hypotension, during the first 3 hours of infusion, occurred in 12% of all patients and 3% of all courses administered. Bradycardia, during the first 3 hours of infusion, occurred in 3% of all patients and 1% of all courses.
In the Phase 3 second-line ovarian study, neither dose nor schedule had an effect on the frequency of hypotension and bradycardia. These vital sign changes most often caused no symptoms and required neither specific therapy nor treatment discontinuation. The frequency of hypotension and bradycardia were not influenced by prior anthracycline therapy.
Significant cardiovascular events possibly related to single-agent paclitaxel occurred in approximately 1% of all patients. These events included syncope, rhythm abnormalities, hypertension and venous thrombosis. One of the patients with syncope treated with paclitaxel at 175 mg/m 2 over 24 hours had progressive hypotension and died.
The arrhythmias included asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia, bigeminy and complete AV block requiring pacemaker placement. Among patients with NSCLC treated with paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin in the Phase 3 study, significant cardiovascular events occurred in 12 to 13%. This apparent increase in cardiovascular events is possibly due to an increase in cardiovascular risk factors in patients with lung cancer.
Electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities were common among patients at baseline. ECG abnormalities on study did not usually result in symptoms, were not dose-limiting, and required no intervention. ECG abnormalities were noted in 23% of all patients.
Among patients with a normal ECG prior to study entry, 14% of all patients developed an abnormal tracing while on study. The most frequently reported ECG modifications were non-specific repolarization abnormalities, sinus bradycardia, sinus tachycardia, and premature beats. Among patients with normal ECGs at baseline, prior therapy with anthracyclines did not influence the frequency of ECG abnormalities.
Cases of myocardial infarction have been reported. Congestive heart failure, including cardiac dysfunction and reduction of left ventricular ejection fraction or ventricular failure, has been reported typically in patients who have received other chemotherapy, notably anthracyclines. (See PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions ). Atrial fibrillation and supraventricular tachycardia have been reported.
Respiratory Interstitial pneumonia, lung fibrosis, and pulmonary embolism have been reported. Radiation pneumonitis has been reported in patients receiving concurrent radiotherapy. Pleural effusion and respiratory failure have been reported.
Neurologic The assessment of neurologic toxicity was conducted differently among the studies as evident from the data reported in each individual study (see TABLES 10 to 16 ). Moreover, the frequency and severity of neurologic manifestations were influenced by prior and/or concomitant therapy with neurotoxic agents. In general, the frequency and severity of neurologic manifestations were dose-dependent in patients receiving single-agency paclitaxel.
The frequency of peripheral neuropathy increased with cumulative dose. Paresthesia commonly occurs in the form of hyperesthesia. Peripheral neuropathy was the cause of paclitaxel discontinuation in 1% of all patients.
Sensory symptoms have usually improved or resolved within several months of paclitaxel discontinuation. Pre-existing neuropathies resulting from prior therapies are not a contraindication for paclitaxel therapy. In the Intergroup first-line ovarian carcinoma study (see TABLE 11 ), neurotoxicity included reports of neuromotor and neurosensory events.
The duration of grade III or IV neurotoxicity cannot be determined with precision for the Intergroup study since the resolution dates of adverse events were not collected in the case report forms for this trial and complete follow-up documentation was available only in a minority of these patients. In patients with NSCLC, administration of paclitaxel followed by cisplatin resulted in a greater incidence of severe neurotoxicity compared to the incidence in patients with ovarian or breast cancer treated with single-agent paclitaxel. Other than peripheral neuropathy, serious neurologic events following paclitaxel administration have been rare (<1%) and have included grand mal seizures, syncope, ataxia, and neuroencephalopathy.
Autonomic neuropathy resulting in paralytic ileus have been reported. Optic nerve and/or visual disturbances (scintillating scotomata) have also been reported, particularly in patients who have received higher doses than those recommended. These effects generally have been reversible.
However, rare reports in the literature of abnormal visual evoked potentials in patients have suggested persistent optic nerve damage. Postmarketing reports of ototoxicity (hearing loss and tinnitus) have also been received. Convulsions, dizziness, and headache have been reported.
Arthralgia/Myalgia There was no consistent relationship between dose or schedule of paclitaxel and the frequency or severity of arthralgia/myalgia. Sixty percent of all patients treated experienced arthralgia/myalgia; 8% experienced severe symptoms. The symptoms were usually transient, occurred two or three days after paclitaxel administration, and resolved within a few days.
The frequency and severity of musculoskeletal symptoms remained unchanged throughout the treatment period. Hepatic No relationship was observed between liver function abnormalities and either dose or schedule of paclitaxel administration. Among patients with normal baseline liver function 7%, 22%, and 19% had elevations in bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and AST (SGOT), respectively.
Prolonged exposure to paclitaxel was not associated with cumulative hepatic toxicity. Hepatic necrosis and hepatic encephalopathy leading to death have reported. Renal Among the patients treated for Kaposi’s sarcoma with paclitaxel, 5 patients had renal toxicity of grade III or IV severity.
One patient wi th suspected HIV nephropathy of grade IV severity had to discontinue therapy. The other 4 patients had renal insufficiency with reversible elevations of serum creatinine. Patients with gynecological cancers treated with paclitaxel and cisplatin may have an increased risk of renal failure with the combination therapy of paclitaxel and cisplatin in gynecological cancers as compared to cisplatin alone.
Gastrointestinal (GI) Nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were reported by 52%, 38%, and 31% of all patients, respectively. These manifestations were usually mild to moderate. Mucositis was schedule dependent and occurred more frequently with the 24-hour than with the 3-hour infusion.
In patients with poor-risk AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, and mucositis were reported by 69%, 79%, and 28% of patients, respectively. One-third of 43 patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma complained of diarrhea prior to study start. (See CLINICAL STUDIES, AIDS-Related Kaposi’s Sarcoma ). In the first-line Phase 3 ovarian carcinoma studies, the incidence of nausea and vomiting when paclitaxel was administered in combination with cisplatin appeared to be greater compared with the database for single-agent paclitaxel in ovarian and breast carcinoma.
In addition, diarrhea of any grade was reported more frequently compared to the control arm, but there was no difference for severe diarrhea in these studies. Intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, pancreatitis, ischemic colitis, and dehydration have been reported. Neutropenic enterocolitis (typhlitis), despite the coadministration of G-CSF, were observed in patients treated with paclitaxel alone and in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents.
Injection Site Reaction Injection site reactions, including reactions secondary to extravasation, were usually mild and consisted of erythema, tenderness, skin discoloration, or swelling at the injection site. These reactions have been observed more frequently with the 24-hour infusion than with the 3-hour infusion. Recurrence of skin reactions at a site of previous extravasation following administration of paclitaxel at a different site, i.e., “recall”, has been reported.
More severe events such as phlebitis, cellulitis, induration, skin exfoliation, necrosis, and fibrosis have been reported. In some cases the onset of the injection site reaction either occurred during a prolonged infusion or was delayed by a week to 10 days. A specific treatment for extravasation reactions is unknown at this time.
Given the possibility of extravasation, it is advisable to closely monitor the infusion site for possible infiltration during drug administration. Other Clinical Events Alopecia was observed in almost all (87%) of the patients. Transient skin changes due to paclitaxel-related hypersensitivity reactions have been observed, but no other skin toxicities were significantly associated with paclitaxel administration.
Nail changes (changes in pigmentation or discoloration of nail bed) were uncommon (2%). Edema was reported in 21% of all patients (17% of those without baseline edema); only 1% had severe edema and none of these patients required treatment discontinuation. Edema was most commonly focal and disease-related.
Edema was observed in 5% of all courses for patients with normal baseline and did not increase with time on study. Skin abnormalities related to radiation recall as well as reports of maculopapular rash, pruritus, Stevens-Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis have been reported. In postmarketing experience, diffuse edema, thickening, and sclerosing of the skin have been reported following paclitaxel administration.
Paclitaxel has been reported to exacerbate signs and symptoms of scleroderma. Reports of asthenia and malaise have been received as part of the continuing surveillance of paclitaxel safety. Conjunctivitis, increased lacrimation, anorexia, confusional state, photopsia, visual floaters, vertigo, and increase in blood creatinine have been reported.
Accidental Exposure Upon inhalation, dyspnea, chest pain, burning eyes, sore throat, and nausea have been reported. Following topical exposure, events have included tingling, burning, and redness. To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 1-866-210-9797 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch.
| Percent of Patients (n=812) | |
|---|---|
| Bone Marrow - Neutropenia <2,000/mm 3 <500/mm 3 - Leukopenia <4,000/mm 3 <1,000/mm 3 - Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm 3 <50,000/mm 3 - Anemia <11 g/dL <8 g/dL - Infections - Bleeding - Red Cell Transfusions - Platelet Transfusions | 90 52 90 17 20 7 78 16 30 14 25 2 |
| Hypersensitivity Reaction b - All - Severe | 41 2 |
| Cardiovascular - Vital Sign Changes c - Bradycardia (n=537) - Hypotension (n=532) - Significant Cardiovascular Events | 3 12 1 |
| Abnormal ECG - All Pts - Pts with normal baseline (n=559) | 23 14 |
| Peripheral Neuropathy - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 60 3 |
| Myalgia/Arthralgia - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 60 8 |
| Gastrointestinal - Nausea and vomiting - Diarrhea - Mucositis | 52 38 31 |
| Alopecia | 87 |
| Hepatic (Pts with normal baseline and on study data) - Bilirubin elevations (n=765) - Alkaline phosphatase elevations (n=575) - AST (SGOT) elevations (n=591) | 7 22 19 |
| Injection Site Reaction | 13 |
| Percent of Patients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intergroup | GOG-111 | |||
| T175/3 b c75 c (n=339) | C750 c c75 c (n=336) | T135/24 b c75 c (n=196) | C750 c c75 c (n=213) | |
| Bone Marrow | ||||
| - Neutropenia <2,000/mm 3 | 91 d | 95 d | 96 | 92 |
| <500/mm 3 | 33 d | 43 d | 81 d | 58 d |
| - Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm 3e | 21 d | 33 d | 26 | 30 |
| <50,000/mm 3 | 3 d | 7 d | 10 | 9 |
| - Anemia <11 g/dL f | 96 | 97 | 88 | 86 |
| <8 g/dL | 3 d | 8 d | 13 | 9 |
| - Infections | 25 | 27 | 21 | 15 |
| - Febrile Neutropenia | 4 | 7 | 15 d | 4 d |
| Hypersensitivity Reaction | ||||
| - All | 11 d | 6 d | 8 d,g | 1 d,g |
| - Severe | 1 | 1 | 3 d,g | - d,g |
| Neurotoxicity h | ||||
| - Any symptoms | 87 d | 52 d | 25 | 20 |
| - Severe symptoms | 21 d | 2 d | 3 d | - d |
| Nausea and Vomiting | ||||
| - Any symptoms | 88 | 93 | 65 | 69 |
| - Severe symptoms | 18 | 24 | 10 | 11 |
| Myalgia/Arthralgia | ||||
| - Any symptoms | 60 d | 27 d | 9 d | 2 d |
| - Severe symptoms | 6 d | 1 d | 1 | - |
| Diarrhea | ||||
| - Any symptoms | 37 d | 29 d | 16 d | 8 d |
| - Severe symptoms | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
| Athenia | ||||
| - Any symptoms | NC | NC | 17 d | 10 d |
| - Severe symptoms | NC | NC | 1 | 1 |
| Alopecia | ||||
| - Any symptoms | 96 d | 89 d | 55 d | 37 d |
| - Severe symptoms | 51 d | 21 d | 6 | 8 |
| Percent of Patients | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 175/3 b (n=95) | 175/24 b (n=105) | 135/3 b (n=98) | 135/24 b (n=105) | |
| Bone Marrow - Neutropenia <2,000/mm 3 <500/mm 3 - Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm 3 <50,000/mm 3 - Anemia <11 g/dL <8 g/dL - Infections | 78 27 4 1 84 11 26 | 98 75 18 7 90 12 29 | 78 14 8 2 68 6 20 | 98 67 6 1 88 10 18 |
| Hypersensitivity Reaction c - All - Severe | 41 2 | 45 0 | 38 2 | 45 1 |
| Peripheral Neuropathy - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 63 1 | 60 2 | 55 0 | 42 0 |
| Mucositis - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 17 0 | 35 3 | 21 0 | 25 2 |
| Percent of Patients | ||||
| Early Population | Total Population | |||
| AC c (n=166) | AC c followed by T d (n=159) | AC c (n=1551) | AC c followed by T d (n=1570) | |
| Bone Marrow e | ||||
| - Neutropenia <500/mm 3 | 79 | 76 | 48 | 50 |
| - Thrombocytopenia <50,000/mm 3 | 27 | 25 | 11 | 11 |
| - Anemia <8 g/dL | 17 | 21 | 8 | 8 |
| - Infections | 6 | 14 | 5 | 6 |
| - Fever Without Infection | – | 3 | <1 | 1 |
| Hypersensitivity Reaction f | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2 |
| Cardiovascular Events | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Neuromotor Toxicity | 1 | 1 | <1 | 1 |
| Neurosensory Toxicity | – | 3 | <1 | 3 |
| Myalgia/Arthralgia | – | 2 | <1 | 2 |
| Nausea/Vomiting | 13 | 18 | 8 | 9 |
| Mucositis | 13 | 4 | 6 | 5 |
| Percent of Patients | ||
| 175/3 b (n=229) | 135/3 b (n=229) | |
| Bone Marrow | ||
| - Neutropenia <2,000/mm 3 | 90 | 81 |
| <500/mm 3 | 28 | 19 |
| - Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm 3 | 11 | 7 |
| <50,000/mm 3 | 3 | 2 |
| - Anemia <11 g/dL | 55 | 47 |
| <8 g/dL | 4 | 2 |
| - Infections | 23 | 15 |
| - Febrile Neutropenia | 2 | 2 |
| Hypersensitivity Reaction c | ||
| - All | 36 | 31 |
| - Severe | 0 | <1 |
| Peripheral Neuropathy | ||
| - Any symptoms | 70 | 46 |
| - Severe symptoms | 7 | 3 |
| Mucositis | ||
| - Any symptoms | 23 | 17 |
| - Severe symptoms | 3 | <1 |
| Percent of Patients | |||
| T135/24 b c75 (n=195) | T250/24 c c75 (n=197) | VP100 d c75 (n=196) | |
| Bone Marrow - Neutropenia <2,000/mm 3 <500/mm 3 - Thrombocytopenia <normal <50,000/mm 3 - Anemia <normal <8 g/dL - Infections | 89 74 e 48 6 94 22 38 | 86 65 68 12 96 19 31 | 84 55 62 16 95 28 35 |
| Hypersensitivity Reaction f - All - Severe | 16 1 | 27 4 e | 13 1 |
| Arthralgia/Myalgia - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 21 e 3 | 42 e 11 | 9 1 |
| Nausea/Vomiting - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 85 27 | 87 29 | 81 22 |
| Mucositis - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 18 1 | 28 4 | 16 2 |
| Neuromotor Toxicity - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 37 6 | 47 12 | 44 7 |
| Neurosensory Toxicity - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 48 13 | 61 28 e | 25 8 |
| Cardiovascular Events - Any symptoms - Severe symptoms | 33 13 | 39 12 | 24 8 |
| Percent of Patients | ||
|---|---|---|
| Study CA139-174 Paclitaxel 135/3 b q 3 wk (n=29) | Study CA139-281 Paclitaxel 100/3 b q 2 wk (n=56) | |
| Bone Marrow | ||
| - Neutropenia <2,000/mm 3 | 100 | 95 |
| <500/mm 3 | 76 | 35 |
| - Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm 3 | 52 | 27 |
| <50,000/mm 3 | 17 | 5 |
| - Anemia <11 g/dL | 86 | 73 |
| <8 g/dL | 34 | 25 |
| - Febrile Neutropenia | 55 | 9 |
| Opportunistic Infection | ||
| - Any | 76 | 54 |
| - Cytomegalovirus | 45 | 27 |
| - Herpes Simplex | 38 | 11 |
| - Pneumocystis carinii | 14 | 21 |
| - M. avinum intracellulare | 24 | 4 |
| - Candidiasis, esophageal | 7 | 9 |
| - Cryptosporidiosis | 7 | 7 |
| - Cryptococcal meningitis | 3 | 2 |
| - Leukoencephalopathy | – | 2 |
| Hypersensitivity Reaction c | ||
| - All | 14 | 9 |
| Cardiovascular | ||
| - Hypotension | 17 | 9 |
| - Bradycardia | 3 | - |
| Peripheral Neuropathy | ||
| - Any | 79 | 46 |
| - Severe | 10 | 2 |
| Myalgia/Arthralgia | ||
| - Any | 93 | 48 |
| - Severe | 14 | 16 |
| Gastrointestinal | ||
| - Nausea and Vomiting | 69 | 70 |
| - Diarrhea | 90 | 73 |
| - Mucositis | 45 | 20 |
| Renal (creatinine elevation) | ||
| - Any | 34 | 18 |
| - Severe | 7 | 5 |
| Discontinuation for drug toxicity | 7 | 16 |
Warnings & Cautions for Paclitaxel
Anaphylaxis and severe hypersensitivity reactions characterized by dyspnea and hypotension requiring treatment, angioedema, and generalized urticaria have occurred in 2 to 4% of patients receiving paclitaxel in clinical trials. Fatal reactions have occurred in patients despite premedication. All patients should be pretreated with corticosteroids, diphenhydramine, and H 2 antagonists. (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ).
Patients who experience severe hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel should not be rechallenged with the drug. Bone marrow suppression (primarily neutropenia) is dose-dependent and is the dose-limiting toxicity. Neutrophil nadirs occurred at a median of 11 days.
Frequent monitoring of blood counts should be instituted during paclitaxel treatment. Severe conduction abnormalities have been documented in <1% of patients during paclitaxel therapy and in some cases requiring pacemaker placement. If patients develop significant conduction abnormalities during paclitaxel infusion, appropriate therapy should be administered and continuous cardiac monitoring should be performed during subsequent therapy with paclitaxel.
Pregnancy Paclitaxel can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Administration of paclitaxel during the period of organogenesis to rabbits at doses of 3 mg/kg/day (about 0.2 the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis) caused embryo- and fetotoxicity, as indicated by intrauterine mortality, increased resorptions, and increased fetal deaths. Maternal toxicity was also observed at this dose.
No teratogenic effects were observed at 1 mg/kg/day (about 1/15 the daily maximum recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis); teratogenic potential could not be assessed at higher doses due to extensive fetal mortality. There are no adequate and well-controlled studies in pregnant women. If paclitaxel is used during pregnancy, or if the patient becomes pregnant while receiving this drug, the patient should be apprised of the potential hazard to the fetus.
Women of child-bearing potential should be advised to avoid becoming pregnant.
Drug Interactions with Paclitaxel
Pharmacokinetic data from these patients demonstrated a decrease in paclitaxel clearance of approximately 33% when paclitaxel was administered following cisplatin. The metabolism of paclitaxel is catalyzed by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP2C8 and CYP3A4. Caution should be exercised when administering paclitaxel concomitantly with known substrates or inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CTP2C8 and CYP3A4.
Caution should be exercised when paclitaxel is concomitantly administered with known substrates (e.g., midazolam, buspirone, felodipine, lovastatin, eletriptan, sildenafil, simvastatin, and triazolam), inhibitors (e.g., atazanavir, clarithromycin, indinavir, itraconazole, ketoconazole, nefazodone, nelfinavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, and telithromycin), and inducers (e.g., rifampin and carbamazepine) of CYP3A4. (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ). Caution should also be exercised when paclitaxel is concomitantly administered with known substrates (e.g., repaglinide and rosiglitazone), inhibitors (e.g., gemfibrozil), and inducers (e.g., rifampin) of CYP2C8. (see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY ). Potential interactions between paclitaxel, a substrate of CYP3A4, and protease inhibitors (ritonavir, saquinavir, indinavir, and nelfinavir), which are substrates and/or inhibitors of CYP3A4, have not been evaluated in clinical trials.
Reports in the literature suggest that plasma levels of doxorubicin (and its active metabolite doxorubicinol) may be increased when paclitaxel and doxorubicin are used in combination.
Pregnancy Safety for Paclitaxel
Pregnancy (See WARNINGS section).
Pediatric Use of Paclitaxel
Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel in pediatric patients have not been established. There have been reports of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity (rarely associated with death) in a clinical trial in pediatric patients in which paclitaxel was infused intravenously over 3 hours at doses ranging from. The toxicity is most likely attributable to the high dose of the ethanol component of the paclitaxel vehicle given over a short infusion time.
The use of concomitant antihistamines may intensify this effect. Although a direct effect of the paclitaxel itself cannot be discounted, the high doses used in this study (over twice the recommended adult dosage) must be considered in assessing the safety of paclitaxel for use in this population.
Contraindications for Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel is contraindicated in patients who have a history of hypersensitivity reactions to paclitaxel or other drugs formulated in polyoxyl 35 castor oil. Paclitaxel should not be used in patients with solid tumors who have baseline neutrophil counts of <1,500 cells/mm 3 or in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma with baseline neutrophil counts of <1,000 cells/mm 3.
Overdosage Information for Paclitaxel
There is no known antidote for paclitaxel overdosage. The primary anticipated complications of overdosage would consist of bone marrow suppression, peripheral neurotoxicity, and mucositis. Overdoses in pediatric patients may be associated with acute ethanol toxicity (see PRECAUTIONS, Pediatric Use ).
Clinical Studies of Paclitaxel
Ovarian Carcinoma First-Line Data The safety and efficacy of paclitaxel followed by cisplatin in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and no prior chemotherapy were evaluated in 2, Phase 3 multicenter, randomized, controlled trials. Although the protocol allowed further therapy, only 15% received both drugs for 9 or more courses. In both studies, patients treated with paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin had significantly higher response rate, longer time to progression, and longer survival time compared with standard therapy.
These differences were also significant for the subset of patients in the Intergroup study with non- optimally debulked disease, although the study was not fully powered for subset analyses ( TABLES 2A and 2B ). Kaplan- Meier survival curves for each study are shown in FIGURES 1 and 2. TABLE 2A.
EFFICACY IN THE PHASE 3 FIRST-LINE OVARIAN CARCINOMA STUDIES a Paclitaxel dose in mg/m 2 /infusion duration in hours; cyclophosphamide and cisplatin doses in mg/m 2. b Among patients with measurable disease only. c Unstratified for the Intergroup Study, Stratified for Study GOG-111. TABLE 2B. FIGURE 1.
SURVIVAL: Cc VERSUS Tc (INTERGROUP) FIGURE 2. SURVIVAL: Cc VERSUS Tc (GOG-111) The adverse event profile for patients receiving paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin in these studies was qualitatively consistent with that seen for the pooled analysis of data from 812 patients treated with single-agent paclitaxel in 10 clinical studies. These adverse events and adverse events from the Phase 3 first-line ovarian carcinoma studies are described in the ADVERSE REACTIONS section in tabular ( TABLES 10 and 11 ) and narrative form.
Second-Line Data Data from five Phase 1 and 2 clinical studies (189 patients), a multicenter randomized Phase 3 study (407 patients), as well as an interim analysis of data from more than 300 patients enrolled in a treatment referral center program were used in support of the use of paclitaxel in patients who have failed initial or subsequent chemotherapy for metastatic carcinoma of the ovary. Response rates in these two studies were with a total of 6 complete and 18 partial responses in 92 patients. The overall response rate for the 407 patients was complete and 60 partial responses.
Duration of response, measured from the first day of treatment was 8.3 months (range, 3.2 to 21.6 months). Median time to progression was 3.7 months (range, 0.1+ to 25.1+ months). Median survival was 11.5 months (range, 0.2 to 26.3+ months).
Response rates, median survival, and median time to progression for the 4 arms are given in the following table. TABLE 3. No difference in response rate was detected when comparing the 3-hour with the 24-hour infusion: 15% versus 17% (p=0.50).
The median time to progression for patients receiving the 3-hour versus the 24-hour infusion was 4.0 months versus 3.7 months, respectively. Median survival was 11.7 months for patients receiving the 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel and 11.2 months for patients receiving the 24 hour infusion (p=0.91). These statistical analyses should be viewed with caution because of the multiple comparisons made.
The adverse event profile in this Phase 3 study was consistent with that seen for the pooled analysis of data from 812 patients treated in 10 clinical studies. These adverse events and adverse events from the Phase 3 second-line ovarian carcinoma study are described in the ADVERSE REACTIONS section in tabular ( TABLES 10 and 12 ) and narrative form. The results of this randomized study support the use of paclitaxel at doses of 135 to 175 mg/m 2, administered by a 3-hour intravenous infusion.
The same doses administered by 24-hour infusion were more toxic. However, the study had insufficient power to determine whether a particular dose and schedule produced superior efficacy. Breast Carcinoma Adjuvant Therapy A Phase 3 Intergroup study (Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, and Southwest Oncology Group ) randomized 3170 patients with node-positive breast carcinoma to adjuvant therapy with paclitaxel or to no further chemotherapy following 4 courses of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC).
This multicenter trial was conducted in women with histologically positive lymph nodes following either a mastectomy or segmental mastectomy and nodal dissections. The 3 x 2 factorial study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of 3 different dose levels of doxorubicin (A) and to evaluate the effect of the addition of paclitaxel administered following the completion of AC therapy. Patients whose tumors were positive were to receive subsequent tamoxifen treatment (20 mg daily for 5 years); patients who received segmental mastectomies prior to study were to receive breast irradiation after recovery from treatment-related toxicities.
At the time of the current analysis, median follow-up was 30.1 months. Of the 2066 patients who were hormone receptor positive, 93% received tamoxifen. The primary analyses of disease-free survival and overall survival used multivariate Cox models, which included paclitaxel administration, doxorubicin dose, number of positive lymph nodes, tumor size, menopausal status, and estrogen receptor status as factors.
Based on the model for disease-free survival, patients receiving AC followed by paclitaxel had a 22% reduction in the risk of disease recurrence compared to patients randomized to AC alone (Hazard Ratio p=0.0022). For disease-free survival and overall survival, p-values were not adjusted for interim analyses. Kaplan-Meier curves are shown in FIGURES 3 and 4.
Increasing the dose of doxorubicin higher than 60 mg/m 2 had no effect on either disease-free survival or overall survival. FUGURE 3. DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL: AC VERSUS AC+T FUGURE 4.
SURVIVAL: AC VERSUS AC+T Subset analyses Subsets defined by variables of known prognostic importance in adjuvant breast carcinoma were examined, including number of positive lymph nodes, tumor size, hormone receptor status, and menopausal status. Such analyses must be interpreted with care, as the most secure finding is the overall study result. In general, a reduction in hazard similar to the overall reduction was seen with paclitaxel for both disease-free and overall survival in all of the larger subsets with one exception; patients with receptor-positive tumors had a smaller reduction in hazard (HR=0.92) for disease-free survival with paclitaxel than other groups.
Results of subset analyses are shown in TABLE 4 TABLE 4. SUBSET ANALYSES — ADJUVANT BREAST CARCINOMA STUDY a Positive for either estrogen or progesterone receptors. b Negative or missing for both estrogen and progesterone receptors (both missing: n=15). These retrospective subgroup analyses suggest that the beneficial effect of paclitaxel is clearly established in the receptor-negative subgroup, but the benefit in receptor-positive patients is not yet clear.
With respect to menopausal status, the benefit of paclitaxel is consistent (see TABLE 4 and FIGURES 5 to 8 ). FIGURE 5. DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL: RECEPTOR STATUS NEGATIVE / UNKNOWN AC VERSUS AC+T F IGURE 6.
DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL—RECEPTOR STATUS POSITIVE AC VERSUS AC+T F IGURE 7. DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL—PREMENOPAUSAL AC VERSUS AC+T FIGURE 8. DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL: POSTMENOPAUSAL AC VERSUS AC+T The adverse event profile for the patients who received paclitaxel subsequent to AC was consistent with that seen in the pooled analysis of data from 812 patients ( TABLE 10 ) treated with single-agent paclitaxel in 10 clinical studies.
After Failure of Initial Chemotherapy Data from 83 patients accrued in three, Phase 2 open-label studies and from 471 patients enrolled in a Phase 3 randomized study were available to support the use of paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma. Phase 2 Open Label Studies Two studies were conducted in 53 patients previously treated with a maximum of one prior chemotherapeutic regimen. The response rates were respectively.
The third Phase 2 study was conducted in extensively pretreated patients who had failed anthracycline therapy and who had received a minimum of 2 chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of metastatic disease. The dose of paclitaxel was 200 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion with G-CSF support. Nine of 30 patients achieved a partial response, for a response rate of Phase 3 Randomized Study This multicenter trial was conducted in patients previously treated with 1 or 2 regimens of chemotherapy.
Patients were randomized to receive paclitaxel at a dose of either given as a 3-hour infusion. In the 471 patients enrolled, 60% had symptomatic disease with impaired performance status at study entry, and 73% had visceral metastases. These patients had failed prior chemotherapy either in the adjuvant setting (30%), the metastatic setting (39%), or both (31%).
Sixty-seven percent of the patients had been previously exposed to anthracyclines and 23% of them had disease considered resistant to this class of agents. The overall response rate for the 454 evaluable patients was complete and 99 partial responses. The median duration of response, measured from the first day of treatment, was 8.1 months (range, 3.4 to 18.1+ months).
Median survival was 11.7 months (range, 0 to 18.9 months). TABLE 5. Response rates, median time to progression, median survival, and 1-year survival rates are given in the following table.
The reported p-values have not been adjusted for multiple comparisons. There were statistically significant differences favoring each of the paclitaxel plus cisplatin arms for response rate and time to tumor progression. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between either paclitaxel plus cisplatin arm and the cisplatin plus etoposide arm.
TABLE 6. In the ECOG study, the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) questionnaire had 7 subscales that measured subjective assessment of treatment. For all other factors, there was no difference in the treatment groups.
These adverse events and adverse events from the Phase 3 first-line NSCLC study are described in the ADVERSE REACTIONS section in tabular ( TABLES 10 and 15 ) and narrative form. AIDS-Related Kaposi’s Sarcoma Data from 2, Phase 2 open-label studies support the use of paclitaxel as second-line therapy in patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma. If no dose-limiting toxicity was observed, patients were to receive in subsequent courses.
Hematopoietic growth factors were not to be used initially. In this study patients could be receiving hematopoietic growth factors before the start of paclitaxel therapy, or this support was to be initiated as indicated; the dose of paclitaxel was not increased. The dose intensity of paclitaxel used in this patient population was lower than the dose intensity recommended for other solid tumors.
All patients had widespread and poor-risk disease. TABLE 7. Efficacy The efficacy of paclitaxel was evaluated by assessing cutaneous tumor response according to the amended ACTG criteria and by seeking evidence of clinical benefit in patients in 6 domains of symptoms and/or conditions that are commonly related to AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma.
Cutaneous Tumor Response (Amended ACTG Criteria) The objective response rate was patients in patients with prior systemic therapy. Cutaneous responses were primarily defined as flattening of more than 50% of previously raised lesions. TABLE 8.
Additional Clinical Benefit Most data on patient benefit were assessed retrospectively (plans for such analyses were not included in the study protocols). Nonetheless, clinical descriptions and photographs indicated clear benefit in some patients, including instances of improved pulmonary function in patients with pulmonary involvement, improved ambulation, resolution of ulcers, and decreased analgesic requirements in patients with Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) involving the feet and resolution of facial lesions and edema in patients with KS involving the face, extremities, and genitalia. Safety The adverse event profile of paclitaxel administered to patients with advanced HIV disease and poor-risk AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma was generally similar to that seen in the pooled analysis of data from 812 patients with solid tumors.
These adverse events and adverse events from the Phase 2 second-line Kaposi’s sarcoma studies are described in the ADVERSE REACTIONS section in tabular ( TABLES 10 and 16 ) and narrative form. In this immunosuppressed patient population, however, a lower dose intensity of paclitaxel and supportive therapy including hematopoietic growth factors in patients with severe neutropenia are recommended. Patients with AIDS-related Kaposi’s sarcoma may have more severe hematologic toxicities than patients with solid tumors. paclitaxel-1figure paclitaxel-2figure paclitaxel-3figure paclitaxel-4figure paclitaxel-5figure paclitaxel-6figure paclitaxel-7figure paclitaxel-8figure
| Intergroup (non-optimally debulked subset) | GOG-111 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T175/3 a c75 (n=218) | C750 a c75 (n=227) | T135/24 a c75 (n=196) | C750 a c75 (n=214) | |||
| Clinical Response b | (n=153) | (n=153) | (n=113) | (n=127) | ||
| - rate (percent) | 58 | 43 | 62 | 48 | ||
| - p-value c | 0.016 | 0.04 | ||||
| Time to Progression | ||||||
| - median (months) | 13.2 | 9.9 | 16.6 | 13.0 | ||
| - p-value c | 0.0060 | 0.0008 | ||||
| - hazard ratio (HR) c | 0.76 | 0.70 | ||||
| - 95% CI c | 0.62 to 0.92 | 0.56 to 0.86 | ||||
| Survival | ||||||
| - median (months) | 29.5 | 21.9 | 35.5 | 24.2 | ||
| - p-value c | 0.0057 | 0.0002 | ||||
| - hazard ratio (HR) c | 0.73 | 0.64 | ||||
| - 95% CI c | 0.58 to 0.91 | 0.50 to 0.81 | ||||
| T175/3 a c75 (n=342) | C750 a c75 (n=338) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinical Response b | (n=162) | (n=161) | |
| - rate (percent) | 59 | 45 | |
| - p-value c | 0.014 | ||
| Time to Progression | |||
| - median (months) | 15.3 | 11.5 | |
| - p-value c | 0.0005 | ||
| - hazard ratio (HR) c | 0.74 | ||
| - 95% CI c | 0.63 to 0.88 | ||
| Survival | |||
| - median (months) | 35.6 | 25.9 | |
| - p-value c | 0.0016 | ||
| - hazard ratio (HR) c | 0.73 | ||
| - 95% CI c | 0.60 to 0.89 |
| 175/3 (n=96) | 175/24 (n=106) | 135/3 (n=99) | 135/24 (n=106) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response | ||||
| - rate (percent) | 14.6 | 21.7 | 15.2 | 13.2 |
| - 95% Confidence Interval | (8.5 to 23.6) | (14.5 to 31) | (9 to 24.1) | (7.7 to 21.5) |
| Time to Progression | ||||
| - median (months) | 4.4 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 2.8 |
| - 95% Confidence Interval | (3.0 to 5.6) | (3.5 to 5.1) | (2.8 to 4.2) | (1.9 to 4) |
| Survival | ||||
| - median (months) | 11.5 | 11.8 | 13.1 | 10.7 |
| - 95% Confidence Interval | (8.4 to 14.4) | (8.9 to 14.6) | (9.1 to 14.6) | (8.1 to 13.6) |
| Patient Subset | Disease-Free Survival | Overall Survival | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of Patients | No. of Recurrences | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | No. of Deaths | Hazard Ratio (95% CI) | |
| No. Positive Nodes | |||||
| 1 to 3 | 1,449 | 221 | 0.72 (0.55 to 0.94) | 107 | 0.76 (0.52 to 1.12) |
| 4 to 9 | 1,310 | 274 | 0.78 (0.61 to 0.99) | 148 | 0.66 (0.47 to 0.91) |
| 10+ | 360 | 129 | 0.93 (0.66 to 1.31) | 87 | 0.90 (0.59 to 1.36) |
| Tumor Size (cm) | |||||
| ≤2 | 1,096 | 153 | 0.79 (0.57 to 1.08) | 67 | 0.73 (0.45 to 1.18) |
| >2 and ≤5 | 1,611 | 358 | 0.79 (0.64 to 0.97) | 201 | 0.74 (0.56 to 0.98) |
| >5 | 397 | 111 | 0.75 (0.51 to 1.08) | 72 | 0.73 (0.46 to 1.16) |
| Menopausal Status | |||||
| Pre | 1,929 | 374 | 0.83 (0.67 to 1.01) | 187 | 0.72 (0.54 to 0.97) |
| Post | 1,183 | 250 | 0.73 (0.57 to 0.93) | 155 | 0.77 (0.56 to 1.06) |
| Receptor Status | |||||
| Positive a | 2,066 | 293 | 0.92 (0.73 to 1.16) | 126 | 0.83 (0.59 to 1.18) |
| Negative/Unknown b | 1,055 | 331 | 0.68 (0.55 to 0.85) | 216 | 0.71 (0.54 to 0.93) |
| 175/3 (n=235) | 135/3 (n=236) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Response - rate (percent) - p-value | 28 | 0.135 | 22 |
| Time to Progression - median (months) - p-value | 4.2 | 0.027 | 3 |
| Survival - median (months) - p-value | 11.7 | 0.321 | 10.5 |
| T135/24 c75 (n=198) | T250/24 c75 (n=201) | VP100 a c75 (n=200) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Response | |||
| - rate (percent) | 25 | 23 | 12 |
| - p-value b | 0.001 | <0.001 | |
| Time to Progression | |||
| - median (months) | 4.3 | 4.9 | 2.7 |
| - p-value b | 0.05 | 0.004 | |
| Survival | |||
| - median (months) | 9.3 | 10 | 7.4 |
| - p-value b | 0.12 | 0.08 | |
| 1-Year Survival | |||
| - percent of patients | 36 | 40 | 32 |
| Prior Systemic Therapy (n=59) | |
| Visceral ± edema ± oral ± cutaneous | 42 |
| Edema or lymph nodes ± oral ± cutaneous | 41 |
| Oral ± cutaneous | 10 |
| Cutaneous only | 7 |
| Prior Systemic Therapy (n=59) | |
| Complete response | 3 |
| Partial response | 56 |
| Stable disease | 29 |
| Progression | 8 |
| Early death/toxicity | 3 |
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Paclitaxel?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Paclitaxel Prices