Nulojix Drug Information
Generic name: BELATACEPT
Selective T Cell Costimulation Blocker [EPC]
Uses of Nulojix
Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients NULOJIX ® (belatacept) is indicated for prophylaxis of organ rejection in adult patients receiving a kidney transplant. NULOJIX is to be used in combination with basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids.
Limitations of Use Use
NULOJIX only in patients who are EBV seropositive. Use of NULOJIX for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in transplanted organs other than kidney has not been established.
Dosage & Administration of Nulojix
Dosage in Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients NULOJIX should be administered in combination with basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and corticosteroids. Corticosteroid utilization should be consistent with the NULOJIX clinical trial experience. Due to an increased risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) predominantly involving the central nervous system (CNS), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), and serious CNS infections, administration of higher than the recommended doses or more frequent dosing of NULOJIX is not recommended.
NULOJIX is for intravenous infusion only. Patients do not require premedication prior to administration of NULOJIX. Dosing instructions are provided in Table 1. • The total infusion dose of NULOJIX should be based on the actual body weight of the patient at the time of transplantation, and should not be modified during the course of therapy, unless there is a change in body weight of greater than 10%. • The prescribed dose of NULOJIX must be evenly divisible by 12.5 mg in order for the dose to be prepared accurately using the reconstituted solution and the silicone-free disposable syringe provided.
Evenly divisible increments are For example: - A patient weighs 64 kg. Table 1: Dosing a,b of NULOJIX for Kidney Transplant Recipients a b The dose prescribed for the patient must be evenly divisible by 12.5 mg see instructions above; eg, evenly divisible increments are Preparation and Administration Instructions NULOJIX is for intravenous infusion only. Caution: NULOJIX must be reconstituted/prepared using only the silicone-free disposable syringe provided with each vial.
If the silicone-free disposable syringe is dropped or becomes contaminated, use a new silicone-free disposable syringe from inventory. Preparation for Administration 1. Calculate the number of NULOJIX vials required to provide the total infusion dose.
Each vial contains 250 mg of belatacept lyophilized powder. 2. Reconstitute the contents of each vial of NULOJIX with 10.5 mL of a suitable diluent using the silicone-free disposable syringe provided with each vial and an 18- to 21-gauge needle. Suitable diluents include: sterile water for injection (SWFI), 0.9% sodium chloride (NS), or 5% dextrose in water (D5W).
Note: If the NULOJIX powder is accidentally reconstituted using a different syringe than the one provided, the solution may develop a few translucent particles. Discard any solutions prepared using siliconized syringes. 3. To reconstitute the NULOJIX powder, remove the flip-top from the vial and wipe the top with an alcohol swab.
Insert the syringe needle into the vial through the center of the rubber stopper and direct the stream of diluent (10.5 mL of SWFI, NS, or D5W) to the glass wall of the vial. 4. To minimize foam formation, rotate the vial and invert with gentle swirling until the contents are completely dissolved. Avoid prolonged or vigorous agitation.
Do not shake. 5. The reconstituted solution contains a belatacept concentration of 25 mg/mL and should be clear to slightly opalescent and colorless to pale yellow. Do not use if opaque particles, discoloration, or other foreign particles are present. 6.
Calculate the total volume of the reconstituted 25 mg/mL NULOJIX solution required to provide the total infusion dose. Volume of 25 mg/mL NULOJIX solution (in mL) = Prescribed Dose (in mg) ÷ 25 mg/mL 7. Prior to intravenous infusion, the required volume of the reconstituted NULOJIX solution must be further diluted with a suitable infusion fluid (NS or D5W).
NULOJIX reconstituted with: • SWFI should be further diluted with either NS or D5W • NS should be further diluted with NS • D5W should be further diluted with D5W 8. From the appropriate size infusion bag or bottle, withdraw a volume of infusion fluid that is equal to the volume of the reconstituted NULOJIX solution required to provide the prescribed dose. With the same silicone-free disposable syringe used for reconstitution, withdraw the required amount of belatacept solution from the vial, inject it into the infusion bag or bottle, and gently rotate the infusion bag or bottle to ensure mixing.
The final belatacept concentration in the infusion bag or bottle should range from 2 mg/mL to 10 mg/mL. Typically, an infusion volume of 100 mL will be appropriate for most patients and doses, but total infusion volumes ranging from 50 mL to 250 mL may be used. Any unused solution remaining in the vials must be discarded. 9.
Prior to administration, the NULOJIX infusion should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration. Discard the infusion if any particulate matter or discoloration is observed. 10. The entire NULOJIX infusion should be administered over a period of 30 minutes and must be administered with an infusion set and a sterile, non-pyrogenic, low-protein-binding filter (with a pore size of 0.2 to 1.2 µm). • The reconstituted solution should be transferred from the vial to the infusion bag or bottle immediately.
The NULOJIX infusion must be completed within 24 hours of reconstitution of the NULOJIX lyophilized powder. If not used immediately, the infusion solution may be stored under refrigeration conditions: 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F) and protected from light for up to 24 hours (a maximum of 4 hours of the total 24 hours can be at room temperature: 20°C to 25°C and room light). • Infuse NULOJIX in a separate line from other concomitantly infused agents. NULOJIX should not be infused concomitantly in the same intravenous line with other agents.
No physical or biochemical compatibility studies have been conducted to evaluate the coadministration of NULOJIX with other agents.
| Dosing for Initial Phase | Dose |
|---|---|
| Day 1 (day of transplantation, prior to implantation) and Day 5 (approximately 96 hours after Day 1 dose) | 10 mg per kg |
| End of Week 2 and Week 4 after transplantation | 10 mg per kg |
| End of Week 8 and Week 12 after transplantation | 10 mg per kg |
| Dosing for Maintenance Phase | Dose |
| End of Week 16 after transplantation and every 4 weeks (plus or minus 3 days) thereafter | 5 mg per kg |
| a [See Clinical Studies (14.1) ] b The dose prescribed for the patient must be evenly divisible by 12.5 mg (see instructions above; eg, evenly divisible increments are 0, 12.5, 25, 37.5, 50, 62.5, 75, 87.5, and 100). | |
| Dosing for Initial Phase | Dose |
| Day 1 (day of transplantation, prior to implantation) and Day 5 (approximately 96 hours after Day 1 dose) | 10 mg per kg |
| End of Week 2 and Week 4 after transplantation | 10 mg per kg |
| End of Week 8 and Week 12 after transplantation | 10 mg per kg |
| Dosing for Maintenance Phase | Dose |
| End of Week 16 after transplantation and every 4 weeks (plus or minus 3 days) thereafter | 5 mg per kg |
Side Effects of Nulojix
Clinical Studies Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, the adverse reaction rates observed cannot be directly compared to rates in other trials and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. The data described below primarily derive from two randomized, active-controlled three-year trials of NULOJIX in de novo kidney transplant patients. These two trials also included a total of 403 patients treated with a NULOJIX regimen of higher cumulative dose and more frequent dosing than recommended.
All patients also received basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil, and corticosteroids. Patients were treated and followed for three years. CNS PTLD, PML, and other CNS infections were more frequently observed in association with a NULOJIX regimen of higher cumulative dose and more frequent dosing compared to the recommended regimen; therefore, administration of higher than the recommended doses and/or more frequent dosing of NULOJIX is not recommended.
About 25% of patients were from the United States and 75% from other countries. The most commonly reported adverse reactions occurring in ≥20% of patients treated with the recommended dose and frequency of NULOJIX were anemia, diarrhea, urinary tract infection, peripheral edema, constipation, hypertension, pyrexia, graft dysfunction, cough, nausea, vomiting, headache, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, and leukopenia. The proportion of patients who discontinued treatment due to adverse reactions was 13% for the recommended NULOJIX regimen and 19% for the cyclosporine control arm through three years of treatment.
The most common adverse reactions leading to discontinuation in NULOJIX-treated patients were cytomegalovirus infection (1.5%) and complications of transplanted kidney (1.5%). Information on selected significant adverse reactions observed during clinical trials is summarized below. The total number of NULOJIX patients from these three studies was compared to the pooled cyclosporine control groups from all three studies (476 patients).
Two of the 5 cases presented with CNS involvement. Six of the 8 cases presented with CNS involvement. One of the 476 patients treated with cyclosporine developed PTLD, without CNS involvement.
All cases of PTLD reported up to 36 months post-transplant in NULOJIX- or cyclosporine-treated patients presented within 18 months of transplantation. Overall, the rate of PTLD in 949 patients treated with any of the NULOJIX regimens was 9-fold higher in those who were EBV seronegative or EBV serostatus unknown (8/139) compared to those who were EBV seropositive (5/810 patients). Therefore NULOJIX is recommended for use only in patients who are EBV seropositive.
The clinical significance of CMV serology as a risk factor for PTLD remains to be determined; however, these findings should be considered when prescribing NULOJIX. No cases of PML were reported in patients treated with the recommended NULOJIX regimen or the control regimen in these trials. The kidney transplant recipient was treated with the NULOJIX regimen of higher cumulative dose and more frequent dosing than recommended, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and corticosteroids for two years.
The liver transplant recipient was treated with 6 months of a NULOJIX dosage regimen that was more intensive than that studied in kidney transplant recipients, MMF at doses higher than the recommended dose, and corticosteroids. Bacterial, Mycobacterial, Viral, and Fungal Infections Adverse reactions of infectious etiology were reported based on clinical assessment by physicians. The causative organisms for these reactions are identified when provided by the physician.
The overall number of infections, serious infections, and select infections with identified etiology reported in patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen or the cyclosporine control in Studies 1 and 2 are shown in Table 3. Fungal infections were reported in 18% of patients receiving NULOJIX compared to 22% receiving cyclosporine, primarily due to skin and mucocutaneous fungal infections. Tuberculosis and herpes infections were reported more frequently in patients receiving NULOJIX than cyclosporine.
Of the patients who developed tuberculosis through three years, all but one NULOJIX patient lived in countries with a high prevalence of tuberculosis. Infusion Reactions There have been no reports of anaphylaxis or drug hypersensitivity in patients treated with NULOJIX in Studies 1 and 2 with up to three years of follow-up. However, milder infusion-related reactions within one hour of infusion were reported in 5% of patients treated with the recommended dose of NULOJIX, similar to the placebo rate.
The most frequent reactions were hypotension and hypertension. A case of anaphylaxis was reported in the postmarketing experience. Proteinuria At Month 1 after transplantation in Studies 1 and 2, the frequency of 2+ proteinuria on urine dipstick in patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen was in patients treated with the cyclosporine control regimen.
The frequency of 2+ proteinuria was similar between the two treatment groups between one and three years after transplantation (<10% in both studies). There were no differences in the occurrence of 3+ proteinuria (<4% in both studies) at any time point, and no patients experienced 4+ proteinuria. The clinical significance of this increase in early proteinuria is unknown.
Immunogenicity Antibodies directed against the belatacept molecule were assessed in 398 patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen in Studies 1 and 2 (212 of these patients were treated for at least two years). Of the 372 patients with immunogenicity assessment at baseline (prior to receiving belatacept treatment), 29 patients tested positive for anti-belatacept antibodies; 13 of these patients had antibodies to the modified cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4). Anti-belatacept antibody titers did not increase during treatment in these 29 patients.
Eight (2%) patients developed antibodies during treatment with the NULOJIX recommended regimen. In the patients who developed antibodies during treatment, the median titer (by dilution method) was 8, with a range of 5 to 80. Of 56 patients who tested negative for antibodies during treatment and reassessed approximately 7 half-lives after discontinuation of NULOJIX, 1 tested antibody positive.
Anti-belatacept antibody development was not associated with altered clearance of belatacept. Samples from 6 patients with confirmed binding activity to the modified cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) region of the belatacept molecule were assessed by an in vitro bioassay for the presence of neutralizing antibodies. Three of these 6 patients tested positive for neutralizing antibodies.
However, the development of neutralizing antibodies may be underreported due to lack of assay sensitivity. The clinical impact of anti-belatacept antibodies (including neutralizing anti-belatacept antibodies) could not be determined in the studies. The data reflect the percentage of patients whose test results were positive for antibodies to belatacept in specific assays.
The observed incidence of antibody (including neutralizing antibody) positivity in an assay may be influenced by several factors including assay sensitivity and specificity, assay methodology, sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease. For these reasons, comparison of the incidence of antibodies to belatacept with the incidence of antibodies to other products may be misleading. However, by the end of the third year, the cumulative incidence of NODAT was 8% (24/304) in patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen and 10% (29/280) in patients treated with the cyclosporine regimen.
Hypertension Blood pressure and use of antihypertensive medications were reported in Studies 1 and 2. By Year 3, one or more antihypertensive medications were used in 85% of NULOJIX-treated patients and 92% of cyclosporine-treated patients. At one year after transplantation, systolic blood pressures were 8 mmHg lower and diastolic blood pressures were 3 mmHg lower in patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen compared to the cyclosporine control regimen.
At three years after transplantation, systolic blood pressures were 6 mmHg lower and diastolic blood pressures were 3 mmHg lower in NULOJIX-treated patients compared to cyclosporine-treated patients. Hypertension was reported as an adverse reaction in 32% of NULOJIX-treated patients and 37% of cyclosporine-treated patients (see Table 4). Dyslipidemia Mean values of total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides were reported in Studies 1 and 2.
The clinical significance of the lower mean triglyceride values in NULOJIX-treated patients at one and three years is unknown. Other Adverse Reactions Adverse reactions that occurred at a frequency of ≥10% in patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen or cyclosporine control regimen in Studies 1 and 2 through three years are summarized by preferred term in decreasing order of frequency within Table 4. Table 4: Adverse Reactions Reported by ≥10% of Patients Treated with Either the NULOJIX Recommended Regimen or Control in Studies 1 and 2 Through Three Years a,b Selected adverse reactions occurring in <10% from NULOJIX-treated patients in either regimen through three years in Studies 1 and 2 are listed below: Immune System Disorders: Guillain-Barré syndrome Infections and Infestations: see Table 3 Gastrointestinal Disorders: stomatitis, including aphthous stomatitis Injury, Poisoning, and Procedural Complications: chronic allograft nephropathy, complications of transplanted kidney, including wound dehiscence, arteriovenous fistula thrombosis Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders: neutropenia Renal and Urinary Disorders: renal impairment, including acute renal failure, renal artery stenosis, urinary incontinence, hydronephrosis Vascular Disorders: hematoma, lymphocele Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders: musculoskeletal pain Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders: alopecia, hyperhidrosis Cardiac Disorders: atrial fibrillation
Postmarketing Experience
Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. When belatacept therapy was resumed, within five minutes after the start of the belatacept infusion the patient developed a generalized rash, pruritus, hypotension, atrial fibrillation, respiratory distress, and syncope, requiring medical treatment. Another belatacept infusion was attempted one month later, but was terminated when the patient experienced more pronounced symptoms of anaphylaxis and required medical treatment.
Vascular Disorder: Venous Thrombosis of the Renal Allograft In postmarketing experience in de novo kidney transplant recipients, some with other predisposing risk factors for venous thrombosis of the renal allograft, venous thrombosis of the renal allograft has occurred when the initial dose of anti-thymocyte globulin, as immunosuppressive induction, was coadministered (at the same or nearly the same time) with the first dose of belatacept.
Long-Term Extension Studies
After completion of the 36-month studies, patients remaining on randomized therapy in Study 1 and Study 2 were eligible for enrollment in the long-term extension studies. No new adverse reactions were observed in the extension studies.
| NULOJIX Nonrecommended Regimen a (N=477) | NULOJIX Recommended Regimen b (N=472) | Cyclosporine (N=476) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial | EBV Positive (n=406) | EBV Negative (n=43) | EBV Unknown (n=28) | EBV Positive (n=404) | EBV Negative (n=48) | EBV Unknown (n=20) | EBV Positive (n=399) | EBV Negative (n=57) | EBV Unknown (n=20) |
| a Regimen with higher cumulative dose and more frequent dosing than the recommended NULOJIX regimen. b In Studies 1 and 2 the NULOJIX regimen is identical to the recommended regimen, but is slightly different in Study 3. | |||||||||
| Study 1 | |||||||||
| CNS PTLD | 1 | 1 | |||||||
| Non-CNS PTLD | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| Study 2 | |||||||||
| CNS PTLD | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Non-CNS PTLD | 1 | ||||||||
| Study 3 | |||||||||
| CNS PTLD | 2 | ||||||||
| Non-CNS PTLD | 1 | ||||||||
| Total (%) | 2 (0.5) | 5 (11.6) | 1 (3.6) | 3 (0.7) | 2 (4.1) | 0 | 0 | 1 (1.8) | 0 |
| Up to Year 1 | Up to Year 3 b | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=401 n (%) | Cyclosporine N=405 n (%) | NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=401 n (%) | Cyclosporine N=405 n (%) | |
| a Studies 1 and 2 were not designed to support comparative claims for NULOJIX for the adverse reactions reported in this table. b Median exposure in days for pooled studies: 1203 for NULOJIX recommended regimen and 1163 for cyclosporine in Studies 1 and 2. c All infections include bacterial, viral, fungal, and other organisms. For infectious adverse reactions, the causative organism is reported if specified by the physician in the clinical trials. d A medically important event that may be life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization. Infections not meeting these criteria are considered non-serious. e BK virus-associated nephropathy was reported in 6 NULOJIX patients (4 of which resulted in graft loss) and 6 cyclosporine patients (none of which resulted in graft loss) by Year 3. f Most herpes infections were non-serious and 1 led to treatment discontinuation. | ||||
| All infections c | 287 (72) | 299 (74) | 329 (82) | 327 (81) |
| Serious infections d | 98 (24) | 113 (28) | 144 (36) | 157 (39) |
| CMV | 44 (11) | 52 (13) | 53 (13) | 56 (14) |
| Polyoma virus e | 10 (3) | 23 (6) | 17 (4) | 27 (7) |
| Herpes f | 27 (7) | 26 (6) | 55 (14) | 46 (11) |
| Tuberculosis | 2 (1) | 1 (<1) | 6 (2) | 1 (<1) |
| Adverse Reaction | NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=401 % | Cyclosporine N=405 % |
|---|---|---|
| a All randomized and transplanted patients in Studies 1 and 2. b Studies 1 and 2 were not designed to support comparative claims for NULOJIX for the adverse reactions reported in this table. | ||
| Infections and Infestations | ||
| Urinary tract infection | 37 | 36 |
| Upper respiratory infection | 15 | 16 |
| Nasopharyngitis | 13 | 16 |
| Cytomegalovirus infection | 12 | 12 |
| Influenza | 11 | 8 |
| Bronchitis | 10 | 7 |
| Gastrointestinal Disorders | ||
| Diarrhea | 39 | 36 |
| Constipation | 33 | 35 |
| Nausea | 24 | 27 |
| Vomiting | 22 | 20 |
| Abdominal pain | 19 | 16 |
| Abdominal pain upper | 9 | 10 |
| Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders | ||
| Hyperkalemia | 20 | 20 |
| Hypokalemia | 21 | 14 |
| Hypophosphatemia | 19 | 13 |
| Dyslipidemia | 19 | 24 |
| Hyperglycemia | 16 | 17 |
| Hypocalcemia | 13 | 11 |
| Hypercholesterolemia | 11 | 11 |
| Hypomagnesemia | 7 | 10 |
| Hyperuricemia | 5 | 12 |
| Procedural Complications | ||
| Graft dysfunction | 25 | 34 |
| General Disorders | ||
| Peripheral edema | 34 | 42 |
| Pyrexia | 28 | 26 |
| Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders | ||
| Anemia | 45 | 44 |
| Leukopenia | 20 | 23 |
| Renal and Urinary Disorders | ||
| Hematuria | 16 | 18 |
| Proteinuria | 16 | 12 |
| Dysuria | 11 | 11 |
| Renal tubular necrosis | 9 | 13 |
| Vascular Disorders | ||
| Hypertension | 32 | 37 |
| Hypotension | 18 | 12 |
| Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders | ||
| Cough | 24 | 18 |
| Dyspnea | 12 | 15 |
| Investigations | ||
| Blood creatinine increased | 15 | 20 |
| Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders | ||
| Arthralgia | 17 | 13 |
| Back pain | 13 | 13 |
| Nervous System Disorders | ||
| Headache | 21 | 18 |
| Dizziness | 9 | 10 |
| Tremor | 8 | 17 |
| Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders | ||
| Acne | 8 | 11 |
| Psychiatric Disorders | ||
| Insomnia | 15 | 18 |
| Anxiety | 10 | 11 |
Warnings & Cautions for Nulojix
Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder
NULOJIX-treated patients have an increased risk for developing post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), predominantly involving the CNS, compared to patients on a cyclosporine-based regimen. As the total burden of immunosuppression is a risk factor for PTLD, higher than the recommended doses or more frequent dosing of NULOJIX and higher than recommended doses of concomitant immunosuppressive agents are not recommended. Physicians should consider PTLD in patients reporting new or worsening neurological, cognitive, or behavioral signs or symptoms.
EBV Serostatus The risk of PTLD was higher in EBV seronegative patients compared to EBV seropositive patients. EBV seropositive patients are defined as having evidence of acquired immunity shown by the presence of IgG antibodies to viral capsid antigen (VCA) and EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA). Epstein-Barr virus serology should be ascertained before starting administration of NULOJIX, and only patients who are EBV seropositive should receive NULOJIX.
Transplant recipients who are EBV seronegative, or with unknown serostatus, should not receive NULOJIX. Other Risk Factors Other known risk factors for PTLD include cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and T cell-depleting therapy. T cell-depleting therapies to treat acute rejection should be used cautiously.
CMV prophylaxis is recommended for at least 3 months after transplantation. Patients who are EBV seropositive and CMV seronegative may be at increased risk for PTLD compared to patients who are EBV seropositive and CMV seropositive. Since CMV seronegative patients are at increased risk for CMV disease (a known risk factor for PTLD), the clinical significance of CMV serology for PTLD remains to be determined; however, these findings should be considered when prescribing NULOJIX.
Management of Immunosuppression
Only physicians experienced in management of systemic immunosuppressant therapy in transplantation should prescribe NULOJIX. Patients receiving the drug should be managed in facilities equipped and staffed with adequate laboratory and supportive medical resources. The physician responsible for the maintenance therapy should have complete information requisite for the follow-up of the patient.
Other Malignancies
Patients receiving immunosuppressants, including NULOJIX, are at increased risk of developing malignancies, in addition to PTLD, including the skin. Exposure to sunlight and ultraviolet (UV) light should be limited by wearing protective clothing and using a sunscreen with a high protection factor.
Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy
Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is an often rapidly progressive and fatal opportunistic infection of the CNS that is caused by the JC virus, a human polyoma virus. In clinical trials with NULOJIX, two cases of PML were reported in patients receiving NULOJIX at higher cumulative doses and more frequently than the recommended regimen, along with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids; one case occurred in a kidney transplant recipient and the second case occurred in a liver transplant recipient. As PML has been associated with high levels of overall immunosuppression, the recommended doses and frequency of NULOJIX and concomitant immunosuppressives, including MMF, should not be exceeded.
Physicians should consider PML in the differential diagnosis in patients with new or worsening neurological, cognitive, or behavioral signs or symptoms. PML is usually diagnosed by brain imaging, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing for JC viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and/or brain biopsy. Consultation with a specialist (eg, neurologist and/or infectious disease) should be considered for any suspected or confirmed cases of PML.
If PML is diagnosed, consideration should be given to reduction or withdrawal of immunosuppression taking into account the risk to the allograft.
Other Serious Infections
Patients receiving immunosuppressants, including NULOJIX, are at increased risk of developing bacterial, viral (cytomegalovirus and herpes), fungal, and protozoal infections, including opportunistic infections. These infections may lead to serious, including fatal, outcomes. Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jiroveci is recommended after transplantation.
Tuberculosis Tuberculosis was more frequently observed in patients receiving NULOJIX than cyclosporine in clinical trials. Patients should be evaluated for tuberculosis and tested for latent infection prior to initiating NULOJIX. Treatment of latent tuberculosis infection should be initiated prior to NULOJIX use.
Polyoma Virus Nephropathy In addition to cases of JC virus-associated PML, cases of polyoma virus-associated nephropathy (PVAN), mostly due to BK virus infection, have been reported. PVAN is associated with serious outcomes; including deteriorating renal function and kidney graft loss. Patient monitoring may help detect patients at risk for PVAN.
Reductions in immunosuppression should be considered for patients who develop evidence of PVAN. Physicians should also consider the risk that reduced immunosuppression represents to the functioning allograft.
Liver Transplant Use of NULOJIX in liver transplant patients is not recommended. In a clinical trial of liver transplant patients, use of NULOJIX regimens with more frequent administration of belatacept than any of those studied in kidney transplant, along with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and corticosteroids, was associated with a higher rate of graft loss and death compared to the tacrolimus control arms. In addition, two cases of PTLD involving the liver allograft (one fatal) and one fatal case of PML were observed among the 147 patients randomized to NULOJIX.
The two cases of PTLD were reported among the 140 EBV seropositive patients (1.4%). The fatal case of PML was reported in a patient receiving higher than recommended doses of NULOJIX and MMF.
Acute Rejection and Graft Loss with Corticosteroid Minimization In postmarketing experience, use of NULOJIX in conjunction with basiliximab induction, MMF, and corticosteroid minimization to 5 mg per day between Day 3 and Week 6 post-transplant was associated with an increased rate and grade of acute rejection, particularly Grade III rejection. These Grade III rejections occurred in patients with 4 to 6 HLA mismatches. Graft loss was a consequence of Grade III rejection in some patients.
Corticosteroid utilization should be consistent with the NULOJIX clinical trial experience.
Immunizations
The use of live vaccines should be avoided during treatment with NULOJIX, including but not limited to the following: intranasal influenza, measles, mumps, rubella, oral polio, BCG, yellow fever, varicella, and TY21a typhoid vaccines.
Coadministration with Anti-Thymocyte Globulin
In postmarketing experience in de novo kidney transplant recipients, some with other predisposing risk factors for venous thrombosis of the renal allograft, venous thrombosis of the renal allograft has occurred when the initial dose of anti-thymocyte globulin, as immunosuppressive induction, was coadministered (at the same or nearly the same time) with the first dose of belatacept. In such patients, the coadministration (at the same or nearly the same time) of anti-thymocyte globulin and belatacept may pose a risk for venous thrombosis of the renal allograft. If anti-thymocyte globulin (or any other cell-depleting induction treatment) and belatacept will be administered concomitantly, a twelve-hour interval between the two administrations is suggested.
Risk of Rejection with Conversion From a CNI Based Maintenance Regimen Conversion of patients receiving a CNI based maintenance regimen to a NULOJIX based maintenance regimen increases the risk of acute rejection. In two randomized controlled studies, kidney transplant recipients at least six months post-transplant and stable on a CNI based regimen who were converted to a belatacept based regimen experienced higher rejection rates mostly during the first year post-conversion than patients maintained on their CNI based regimens. Conversion of stable kidney transplant recipients from a CNI based maintenance therapy to a belatacept based maintenance therapy is not recommended unless the patient is CNI intolerant.
Drug Interactions with Nulojix
Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) Monitor for a need to adjust concomitant mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) dosage when a patient’s therapy is switched between cyclosporine and NULOJIX, as cyclosporine decreases mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure by preventing enterohepatic recirculation of MPA while NULOJIX does not: • A higher MMF dosage may be needed after switching from NULOJIX to cyclosporine, since this may result in lower MPA concentrations and increase the risk of graft rejection. • A lower MMF dosage may be needed after switching from cyclosporine to NULOJIX, since this may result in higher MPA concentrations and increase the risk for adverse reactions related to MPA (review the Full Prescribing Information for MMF).
Cytochrome P450 Substrates
No dosage adjustments are needed for drugs metabolized via CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP3A, and CYP2C19 when coadministered with NULOJIX.
Anti-Thymocyte Globulin Coadministration (at the same or nearly the same time) of anti-thymocyte globulin (or any other cell-depleting induction treatment) and belatacept in de novo kidney transplant recipients, especially those with other predisposing risk factors for venous thrombosis of the renal allograft, may pose a risk for venous thrombosis of the renal allograft.
Pregnancy Safety for Nulojix
Pregnancy Pregnancy Exposure Registry To monitor maternal-fetal outcomes of pregnant women who have received immunosuppressants including NULOJIX or whose partners have received NULOJIX, healthcare providers are strongly encouraged to register pregnant patients in the Transplant Pregnancy Registry International (TPR) by calling 1-877-955-6877. Risk Summary The data with NULOJIX use in pregnant women are insufficient to inform on drug-associated risk. Belatacept is known to cross the placenta of animals.
Administration of belatacept to pregnant rats and rabbits during the period of organogenesis was not teratogenic at exposures approximately 16 and 19 times greater than that observed at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 10 mg per kg body weight administered over the first month of treatment, based on area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). In a pre- and postnatal development study in rats, treatment-related infections in dams were associated with increased pup mortality, presumably secondary to deteriorating maternal health, at exposures 3 times higher than that observed at MRHD. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown; however, in the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects is 2 to 4% and of miscarriage is 15 to 20% of clinically recognized pregnancies.
Data Animal Data In embryo-fetal development studies, daily intravenous administration of belatacept to pregnant rats and rabbits throughout the period of organogenesis did not produce adverse fetal effects at doses up to 200 mg per kg and 100 mg per kg, respectively (16 and 19 times the MRHD exposure, based on AUC). In a pre- and postnatal development study, daily intravenous administration of belatacept to rats from Day 6 of gestation through Day 20 of the lactation period was associated with maternal toxicity (infections) in a small percentage of dams at doses ≥20 mg per kg (3 times the MRHD exposure, based on AUC) resulting in increased pup mortality (up to 100% pup mortality in some dams). In pups that survived, there were no abnormalities or malformations at doses up to 200 mg per kg (19 times the MRHD exposure, based on AUC).
In vitro data indicate that belatacept has lower binding affinity to CD80/CD86 and lower potency in rodents than in humans. Although the rat toxicity studies with belatacept were done at pharmacologically saturating doses, the in vivo difference in potency between rats and humans is unknown. Therefore, the relevance of the rat toxicities to humans and the significance of the magnitude of the relative exposures (rats:humans) are unknown.
Abatacept, a fusion protein that differs from belatacept by two amino acids, binds to the same ligands (CD80/CD86) and blocks T cell costimulation like belatacept, but is more active than belatacept in rodents. Therefore, toxicities identified with abatacept in rodents, including infections and autoimmunity, may be predictive of adverse effects in humans treated with belatacept. Autoimmunity was observed in 1 rat offspring exposed to abatacept in utero and/or during lactation and in juvenile rats after treatment with abatacept.
However, the clinical relevance of autoimmunity in rats to patients or a fetus exposed in utero is unknown.
Pediatric Use of Nulojix
Pediatric Use The safety and efficacy of NULOJIX in patients under 18 years of age have not been established. Because T cell development continues into the teenage years, the potential concern for autoimmunity in neonates applies to pediatric use as well.
Contraindications for Nulojix
NULOJIX is contraindicated in transplant recipients who are Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seronegative or with unknown EBV serostatus due to the risk of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD), predominantly involving the central nervous system (CNS). Patients who are EBV seronegative or with unknown EBV serostatus.
Overdosage Information for Nulojix
Single doses up to 20 mg per kg of NULOJIX have been administered to healthy subjects without apparent toxic effect. The administration of NULOJIX of higher cumulative dose and more frequent dosing than recommended in kidney transplant patients resulted in a higher frequency of CNS-related adverse reactions. In case of overdosage, it is recommended that the patient be monitored for any signs or symptoms of adverse reactions and appropriate symptomatic treatment instituted.
Clinical Studies of Nulojix
Prevention of Organ Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients The efficacy and safety of NULOJIX in de novo kidney transplantation were assessed in two open-label, randomized, multicenter, active-controlled trials (Study 1 and Study 2). These trials evaluated two dose regimens of NULOJIX, the recommended dosage regimen and a regimen with higher cumulative doses and more frequent dosing than the recommended dosage regimen, compared to a cyclosporine control regimen. All treatment groups also received basiliximab induction, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and corticosteroids.
Starting at Week 16 after transplantation, NULOJIX was administered at the maintenance dose of 5 mg per kg every four weeks (plus or minus three days). NULOJIX was administered as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes. Basiliximab 20 mg was administered intravenously on the day of transplantation and four days later.
The initial dose of MMF was 1 gram twice daily and was adjusted as needed, based on clinical signs of adverse events or efficacy failure. Actual median corticosteroid doses used with the NULOJIX recommended regimen from Week 1 through Month 6 are summarized in the table below (Table 6). Standard criteria donor organs were defined as organs from a deceased donor with anticipated cold ischemia time of <24 hours and not meeting the definition of extended criteria donor organs.
Extended criteria donors were defined as deceased donors with at least one of the following: donor age ≥60 years; donor age ≥50 years and other donor comorbidities (≥2 of the following: stroke, hypertension, serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL); donation of organ after cardiac death; or anticipated cold ischemia time of the organ of ≥24 hours. Both studies excluded recipients with HIV, hepatitis C, or evidence of current hepatitis B infection; recipients with active tuberculosis; and recipients in whom intravenous access was difficult to obtain. Efficacy data are presented for the NULOJIX recommended regimen and cyclosporine regimen in Studies 1 and 2.
The NULOJIX regimen with higher cumulative doses and more frequent dosing of belatacept was associated with more efficacy failures. Higher doses and/or more frequent dosing of NULOJIX are not recommended. The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in all treatment arms (14% to 18%).
Premature discontinuation from treatment at the end of the first year occurred in 19% of patients receiving the NULOJIX recommended regimen and 19% of patients on the cyclosporine regimen. Among the patients who received the NULOJIX recommended regimen, 10% discontinued due to lack of efficacy, 5% due to adverse events, and 4% for other reasons. At the end of three years, 25% of patients receiving the NULOJIX recommended regimen and 34% of patients receiving the cyclosporine regimen had discontinued from treatment.
Among the patients who received the NULOJIX recommended regimen, 12% discontinued due to lack of efficacy, 7% due to adverse events, and 6% for other reasons. Among the patients who received the cyclosporine regimen, 15% discontinued due to adverse events, 8% due to lack of efficacy, and 11% for other reasons. Assessment of Efficacy Table 7 summarizes the results of Study 1 following one and three years of treatment with the NULOJIX recommended dosage regimen and the cyclosporine control regimen.
Efficacy failure at one year was defined as the occurrence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death, or lost to follow-up. BPAR was defined as histologically confirmed acute rejection by a central pathologist on a biopsy done for any reason, whether or not accompanied by clinical signs of rejection. Patient and graft survival was also assessed separately.
Table 7: Efficacy Outcomes by Years 1 and 3 for Study 1: Recipients of Living and Standard Criteria Deceased Donor Kidneys, the rate of BPAR at one year and three years was higher in patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen than the cyclosporine regimen. By three years, recurrent BPAR occurred with similar frequency across treatment groups (<3%). The component of BPAR determined by biopsy only (subclinical protocol-defined acute rejection) was 5% in both treatment groups.
Patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen experienced episodes of BPAR classified as Banff grade IIb or higher (6% at one year and 7% at three years) more frequently compared to patients treated with the cyclosporine regimen (2% at one year and 2% at three years). The overall prevalence of donor-specific antibodies was 5% and 11% for the NULOJIX recommended regimen and cyclosporine, respectively, up to 36 months post-transplant. While the difference in GFR in patients with BPAR versus those without BPAR was greater in patients treated with NULOJIX than cyclosporine, the mean GFR following BPAR was similar in NULOJIX (49 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) and cyclosporine treated patients (43 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ) at one year.
The relationship between BPAR, GFR, and patient and graft survival is unclear due to the limited number of patients who experienced BPAR, differences in renal hemodynamics (and, consequently, GFR) across maintenance immunosuppression regimens, and the high rate of switching treatment regimens after BPAR. Assessment of Efficacy in the EBV Seropositive Subpopulation NULOJIX is recommended for use only in EBV seropositive patients. In Study 1, approximately 87% of patients were EBV seropositive prior to transplant.
Efficacy results in the EBV seropositive subpopulation were consistent with those in the total population studied. Assessment of Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) was measured at one and two years and was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula at one, two, and three years after transplantation. As shown in Table 8, both measured and calculated GFR was higher in patients treated with the NULOJIX recommended regimen compared to patients treated with the cyclosporine control regimen at all time points.
As shown in Figure 1, the differences in GFR were apparent in the first month after transplant and were maintained up to three years (36 months). CAN was not evaluated after the first year following transplantation. The clinical significance of this finding is unknown.
The incidence of delayed graft function was similar in all treatment arms (47% to 49%). Among the patients who received the NULOJIX recommended regimen, 14% discontinued due to adverse events, 9% due to lack of efficacy, and 2% for other reasons. Table 9: Efficacy Outcomes by Years 1 and 3 for Study 2: Recipients of Extended Criteria Donor Kidneys, the rate of BPAR at one year and three years was similar in patients treated with NULOJIX and cyclosporine.
A similar proportion of patients in the NULOJIX recommended regimen group experienced BPAR classified as Banff grade IIb or higher (5% at one year and 6% at three years) compared to patients treated with the cyclosporine regimen (4% at one year and 5% at three years). In Study 2, approximately 91% of the patients were EBV seropositive prior to transplant.
Long-Term Extension (LTE) of Study 1 and Study 2
Although initially designed as three-year studies, Studies 1 and 2 were subsequently extended to seven years to provide descriptive long-term safety and efficacy data. Only patients who completed the assigned treatment for three years and consented to remain on the assigned treatment from three to seven years were eligible for the long-term extension (LTE) studies. The most common reasons for discontinuation from the LTE study included adverse events and death.
No PTLD was reported in the NULOJIX groups while 1 case of non-CNS PTLD was reported in the cyclosporine group, in a patient who was EBV seropositive at the time of transplant. No PML was reported in the NULOJIX groups while 1 case of PML was reported in the cyclosporine group at 82 months post-transplant (56 days after discontinuing therapy). The higher calculated GFR observed in NULOJIX-treated patients compared to cyclosporine-treated patients during the first three years was maintained during the LTE period.
Six cases of PTLD were reported among the three treatment groups: 4 in the NULOJIX recommended regimen group, 1 in the NULOJIX nonrecommended regimen group, and 1 in the cyclosporine group. Three of these cases (1 in each treatment group) occurred in patients who were EBV seropositive at the time of transplant and the other 3 cases (in NULOJIX recommended regimen) occurred in patients who were EBV seronegative. No case of PML was reported among the three treatment groups.
Table 13: Events Reported in Patients with Complete 7-Year Patient and Graft Survival Follow-Up Data
| Day of Dosing | Median (Q1–Q3) Daily Dose b,c | |
|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | Study 2 | |
| a Corticosteroid = prednisone or prednisolone. b The protocols allowed for flexibility in determining corticosteroid dose and rapidity of taper after Day 15. It is not possible to distinguish corticosteroid doses used to treat acute rejection versus doses used in a maintenance regimen. c Q1 and Q3 are the 25 th and 75 th percentiles of daily corticosteroid doses, respectively. | ||
| Week 1 | 31.7 mg (26.7-50 mg) | 30 mg (26.7-50 mg) |
| Week 2 | 25 mg (20-30 mg) | 25 mg (20-30 mg) |
| Week 4 | 20 mg (15-20 mg) | 20 mg (15-22.5 mg) |
| Week 6 | 15 mg (10-20 mg) | 16.7 mg (12.5-20 mg) |
| Month 6 | 10 mg (5-10 mg) | 10 mg (5-12.5 mg) |
| Parameter | NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=226 n (%) | Cyclosporine (CSA) N=221 n (%) | NULOJIX-CSA (97.3% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Patients may have experienced more than one event. b Patients known to be alive with a functioning graft. | |||
| Efficacy Failure by Year 1 | 49 (21.7) | 37 (16.7) | 4.9 (−3.3, 13.2) |
| Components of Efficacy Failure a | |||
| Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection | 45 (19.9) | 23 (10.4) | |
| Graft Loss | 5 (2.2) | 8 (3.6) | |
| Death | 4 (1.8) | 7 (3.2) | |
| Lost to follow-up | 0 | 1 (0.5) | |
| Efficacy Failure by Year 3 | 58 (25.7) | 57 (25.8) | −0.1 (−9.3, 9) |
| Components of Efficacy Failure a | |||
| Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection | 50 (22.1) | 31 (14) | |
| Graft Loss | 9 (4) | 10 (4.5) | |
| Death | 10 (4.4) | 15 (6.8) | |
| Lost to follow-up | 2 (0.9) | 5 (2.3) | |
| Patient and graft survival b | |||
| Year 1 | 218 (96.5) | 206 (93.2) | 3.2 (−1.5, 8.4) |
| Year 3 | 206 (91.2) | 192 (86.9) | 4.3 (−2.2, 10.8) |
| Parameter | NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=226 | Cyclosporine (CSA) N=221 | NULOJIX-CSA (97.3% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a GFR was measured using the cold-iothalamate method. b Measured GFR was not assessed at Year 3. c GFR was calculated using the MDRD formula. | |||
| Measured GFR a mL/min/1.73 m 2 mean (SD) | |||
| Year 1 | 63.4 (27.7) | 50.4 (18.7) | 13.0 (7.3, 18.7) |
| (n=206) | (n=199) | ||
| Year 2 b | 67.9 (29.9) | 50.5 (20.5) | 17.4 (11.5, 23.4) |
| (n=199) | (n=185) | ||
| Calculated GFR c mL/min/1.73 m 2 mean (SD) | |||
| Year 1 | 65.4 (22.9) | 50.1 (21.1) | 15.3 (10.3, 20.3) |
| (n=200) | (n=199) | ||
| Year 2 | 65.4 (25.2) | 47.9 (23) | 17.5 (12, 23.1) |
| (n=201) | (n=182) | ||
| Year 3 | 65.8 (27) | 44.4 (23.6) | 21.4 (15.4, 27.4) |
| (n=190) | (n=171) | ||
| Parameter | NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=175 n (%) | Cyclosporine (CSA) N=184 n (%) | NULOJIX-CSA (97.3% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Patients may have experienced more than one event. b Patients known to be alive with a functioning graft. | |||
| Efficacy Failure by Year 1 | 51 (29.1) | 52 (28.3) | 0.9 (−9.7, 11.5) |
| Components of Efficacy Failure a | |||
| Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection | 37 (21.1) | 34 (18.5) | |
| Graft Loss | 16 (9.1) | 20 (10.9) | |
| Death | 5 (2.9) | 8 (4.3) | |
| Lost to follow-up | 0 | 2 (1.1) | |
| Efficacy Failure by Year 3 | 63 (36) | 68 (37) | −1.0 (−12.1, 10.3) |
| Components of Efficacy Failure a | |||
| Biopsy Proven Acute Rejection | 42 (24) | 42 (22.8) | |
| Graft Loss | 21 (12) | 23 (12.5) | |
| Death | 15 (8.6) | 17 (9.2) | |
| Lost to follow-up | 1 (0.6) | 5 (2.7) | |
| Patient and graft survival b | |||
| Year 1 | 155 (88.6) | 157 (85.3) | 3.2 (−4.8, 11.3) |
| Year 3 | 143 (81.7) | 143 (77.7) | 4.0 (−5.4, 13.4) |
| Parameter | NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=175 | Cyclosporine (CSA) N=184 | NULOJIX-CSA (97.3% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
| a GFR was measured using the cold-iothalamate method. b Measured GFR was not assessed at Year 3. c GFR was calculated using the MDRD formula. | |||
| Measured GFR a mL/min/1.73 m 2 mean (SD) | |||
| Year 1 | 49.6 (25.8) | 45.2 (21.1) | 4.3 (−1.5, 10.2) |
| (n=151) | (n=154) | ||
| Year 2 b | 49.7 (23.7) | 45.0 (27.2) | 4.7 (−1.8, 11.3) |
| (n=139) | (n=136) | ||
| Calculated GFR c mL/min/1.73 m 2 mean (SD) | |||
| Year 1 | 44.5 (21.8) | 36.5 (21.1) | 8.0 (2.5, 13.4) |
| (n=158) | (n=159) | ||
| Year 2 | 42.8 (24.1) | 34.9 (21.6) | 8.0 (1.9, 14) |
| (n=158) | (n=154) | ||
| Year 3 | 42.2 (25.2) | 31.5 (22.1) | 10.7 (4.3, 17.2) |
| (n=154) | (n=143) | ||
| NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=166 n (%) | NULOJIX Nonrecommended Regimen N=155 n (%) | Cyclosporine N=136 n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a This patient was EBV seropositive at the time of transplant. | |||
| Death | 7 (4.2) | 7 (4.5) | 10 (7.4) |
| Graft Loss | 2 (1.2) | 0 (0) | 6 (4.4) |
| Death or Graft Loss | 9 (5.4) | 7 (4.5) | 14 (10.3) |
| PTLD | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 a (0.7) |
| PML | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1 (0.7) |
| NULOJIX Recommended Regimen N=113 n (%) | NULOJIX Nonrecommended Regimen N=104 n (%) | Cyclosporine N=87 n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| a Three of these patients were EBV seronegative at the time of transplant. | |||
| Death | 21 (18.6) | 14 (13.5) | 9 (10.3) |
| Graft Loss | 1 (0.9) | 2 (1.9) | 6 (6.9) |
| Death or Graft Loss | 22 (19.5) | 16 (15.4) | 14 (16.1) |
| PTLD | 4 a (3.6) | 1 (1.0) | 1 (1.2) |
| PML | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
| NULOJIX Recommended Regimen n (%) | NULOJIX Nonrecommended Regimen n (%) | Cyclosporine n (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study 1 | N=163 | N=153 | N=132 |
| Death | 17 (10%) | 17 (11%) | 26 (20%) |
| Graft Loss | 11 (7%) | 10 (7%) | 17 (13%) |
| Death or Graft Loss | 27 (17%) | 25 (16%) | 40 (30%) |
| Study 2 | N=138 | N=128 | N=108 |
| Death | 37 (27%) | 37 (29%) | 29 (27%) |
| Graft Loss | 23 (17%) | 21 (16%) | 29 (27%) |
| Death or Graft Loss | 54 (39%) | 54 (42%) | 52 (48%) |
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Nulojix?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Nulojix Prices