Nucala Drug Information
Generic name: MEPOLIZUMAB
Interleukin-5 Antagonist [EPC]
Uses of Nucala
Maintenance Treatment of Severe Asthma NUCALA is indicated for the add-on maintenance treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 6 years and older with severe asthma and with an eosinophilic phenotype. Limitations of Use NUCALA is not indicated for the relief of acute bronchospasm or status asthmaticus.
Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps NUCALA is indicated for the add-on maintenance treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in adult patients aged 18 years and older with inadequate response to nasal corticosteroids.
Maintenance Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease NUCALA is indicated for the add-on maintenance treatment of adult patients with inadequately controlled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and an eosinophilic phenotype.
Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis NUCALA is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome NUCALA is indicated for the treatment of adult and pediatric patients aged 12 years and older with hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) for greater than or equal to 6 months without an identifiable non-hematologic secondary cause.
Dosage & Administration of Nucala
Preparation and Administration of NUCALA for Injection Vial NUCALA for injection should be reconstituted and administered by a healthcare professional. In line with clinical practice, monitoring of patients after administration of biologic agents is recommended. Reconstitution Instructions 1.
Reconstitute NUCALA for injection in the vial with 1.2 mL of Sterile Water for Injection, USP, preferably using a 2- or 3-mL syringe and a 21-gauge needle. The reconstituted solution will contain a concentration of 100 mg/mL mepolizumab. Do not mix with other medications. 2.
Direct the stream of Sterile Water for Injection vertically onto the center of the lyophilized powder, which may have a cake-like appearance. Gently swirl the vial for 10 seconds with a circular motion at 15-second intervals until the powder is dissolved. Note: Do not shake the reconstituted solution during the procedure as this may lead to product foaming or precipitation.
Reconstitution is typically complete within 5 minutes after the Sterile Water for Injection has been added, but it may take additional time. 3. If a mechanical reconstitution device (swirler) is used to reconstitute NUCALA for injection, swirl at 450 rpm for no longer than 10 minutes. Alternatively, swirling at 1,000 rpm for no longer than 5 minutes is acceptable. 4.
Visually inspect the reconstituted solution for particulate matter and clarity before use. The solution should be clear to opalescent and colorless to pale yellow or pale brown, essentially particle free. Small air bubbles, however, are expected and acceptable.
If particulate matter remains in the solution or if the solution appears cloudy or milky, the solution must not be administered. 5. If the reconstituted solution is not used immediately: • store below 30°C (86°F), • do not freeze, and • discard if not used within 8 hours of reconstitution. Administration of 100 mg Dose 1.
For subcutaneous administration, preferably using a 1-mL polypropylene syringe fitted with a disposable 21- to 27-gauge x 0.5-inch (13-mm) needle. 2. Just before administration, remove 1 mL of reconstituted NUCALA for injection. Do not shake the reconstituted solution during the procedure as this could lead to product foaming or precipitation. 3.
Administer the 1 mL injection (equivalent to 100 mg of mepolizumab) subcutaneously into the upper arm, thigh, or abdomen. Administration of 40 mg Dose 1. Administer the 0.4 mL injection (equivalent to 40 mg of mepolizumab) subcutaneously into the upper arm, thigh, or abdomen.
Each vial of NUCALA for injection should be used for a single patient, and any remainder of the contents should be discarded.
Preparation and Administration of NUCALA Injection Prefilled Autoinjector and Prefilled Syringes NUCALA injection is intended for use under the guidance of a healthcare provider. The 100 mg/mL prefilled autoinjector and 100 mg/mL prefilled syringe are only for use in adults and adolescents aged 12 years and older. A patient may self-inject, or the patient caregiver may administer NUCALA injection 100 mg/mL subcutaneously after the healthcare provider determines it is appropriate.
The 40 mg/0.4 mL prefilled syringe is only for use in children aged 6 to 11 years and must be administered by the healthcare provider or the patient caregiver. The patient caregiver may administer NUCALA injection 40 mg/0.4 mL subcutaneously after the healthcare provider determines it is appropriate. Provide proper training in subcutaneous injection technique and on the preparation and administration of NUCALA injection prior to use. 1.
Remove the prefilled autoinjector or prefilled syringe from the refrigerator and allow it to sit at room temperature for 30 minutes prior to injection. Do not warm NUCALA injection in any other way. 2. Prior to administration, visually inspect the window of the prefilled autoinjector or the prefilled syringe for particulate matter or discoloration.
NUCALA injection should be clear to opalescent, colorless to pale yellow to pale brown in color. Do not use NUCALA injection if the product exhibits discoloration, cloudiness, or particulate matter. Do not use the NUCALA prefilled autoinjector or prefilled syringe if dropped on a hard surface. 3.
Administer the subcutaneous injection into the thigh or abdomen, avoiding the 5 cm (approximately 2 inches) around the navel. The upper arm can also be used if a caregiver administers the subcutaneous injection. 4. For use in EGPA and HES, ensure injection sites for each subcutaneous injection are separated by at least 5 cm (approximately 2 inches). 5.
Never give injections into areas where the skin is tender, bruised, red, or hard. 6. If a dose is missed, administer a dose as soon as possible. Thereafter, the patient can resume dosing on the usual day of administration.
If the next dose is already due, then administer as planned.
| a 300 mg dose is administered as 3 separate 100 mg dose injections administered at least 5 cm (approximately 2 inches) apart. | ||
| Indication | Adults | Pediatric Patients |
| Severe asthma | 100 mg every 4 weeks | • 12 to 17 years of age: 100 mg every 4 weeks • 6 to 11 years of age: 40 mg every 4 weeks |
| Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps | 100 mg every 4 weeks | Not applicable |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 100 mg every 4 weeks | Not applicable |
| Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis | 300 mg a every 4 weeks | Not applicable |
| Hypereosinophilic syndrome | 300 mg a every 4 weeks | 12 to 17 years of age: 300 mg a every 4 weeks |
Side Effects of Nucala
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared with rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Adverse Reactions in Adult and Adolescent Patients Aged 12 Years and Older with Severe Asthma A total of 1,327 patients with severe asthma were evaluated in 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials of 24 to 52 weeks’ duration (Severe Asthma Trials DREAM, MENSA, and SIRIUS). Of these, 1,192 had a history of 2 or more exacerbations in the year prior to enrollment despite regular use of high-dose ICS plus additional controller(s) (Severe Asthma Trials DREAM and MENSA), and 135 patients required daily oral corticosteroids (OCS) in addition to regular use of high-dose ICS plus additional controller(s) to maintain asthma control (Severe Asthma Trial SIRIUS).
All patients had markers of eosinophilic airway inflammation. Table 2. Adverse Reactions with NUCALA with ≥3% Incidence and More Common than Placebo in Patients with Severe Asthma (MENSA and SIRIUS) 52-Week Trial: Adverse reactions from the Severe Asthma Trial DREAM with 52 weeks of treatment with mepolizumab 75 mg intravenously (n = 153) or placebo (n = 155) and with ≥3% incidence and more common than placebo and not shown in Table 2 were: abdominal pain, allergic rhinitis, asthenia, bronchitis, cystitis, dizziness, dyspnea, ear infection, gastroenteritis, lower respiratory tract infection, musculoskeletal pain, nasal congestion, nasopharyngitis, nausea, pharyngitis, pyrexia, rash, toothache, viral infection, viral respiratory tract infection, and vomiting.
In addition, 3 cases of herpes zoster occurred in patients receiving mepolizumab 75 mg intravenously compared with 2 patients in the placebo group. Systemic Reactions, including Hypersensitivity Reactions: In the Severe Asthma Trials DREAM, MENSA, and SIRIUS described above, the percentage of patients who experienced systemic (allergic and non-allergic) reactions was 3% in the group receiving NUCALA 100 mg and 5% in the placebo group. Systemic allergic/hypersensitivity reactions were reported by 1% of patients in the group receiving NUCALA 100 mg and 2% of patients in the placebo group.
The most commonly reported manifestations of systemic allergic/hypersensitivity reactions reported in the group receiving NUCALA 100 mg included rash, pruritus, headache, and myalgia. A majority of the systemic reactions in patients receiving NUCALA 100 mg (5/7) were experienced on the day of dosing. Injection Site Reactions: Injection site reactions (e.g., pain, erythema, swelling, itching, burning sensation) occurred at a rate of 8% in patients receiving NUCALA 100 mg compared with 3% in patients receiving placebo.
Long-Term Safety: Nine hundred ninety-eight patients received NUCALA 100 mg in open-label extension studies, during which additional cases of herpes zoster were reported. The overall adverse event profile has been similar to the severe asthma trials described above. Patients received NUCALA for 12 weeks (initial short phase).
After a treatment interruption of 8 weeks, 30 patients received NUCALA for a further 52 weeks (long phase). The adverse reaction profile for patients aged 6 to 11 years was similar to that observed in patients aged 12 years and older. Adverse Reactions in Adult Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps A total of 407 patients with CRSwNP were evaluated in 1 randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 52-week treatment trial.
Patients received NUCALA 100 mg or placebo subcutaneously once every 4 weeks. Patients had recurrent CRSwNP with a history of prior surgery and were on nasal corticosteroids for at least 8 weeks prior to screening. Table 3 summarizes adverse reactions that occurred in ≥3% of patients treated with NUCALA and more frequently than in patients treated with placebo in the CRSwNP trial.
Table 3. Adverse Reactions with NUCALA with ≥3% Incidence and More Common than Placebo in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Systemic Reactions, including Hypersensitivity Reactions: In the 52-week trial, the percentage of patients who experienced systemic (allergic and other) reactions was <1% in the group receiving NUCALA 100 mg and <1% in the placebo group. The manifestations of systemic allergic (type I hypersensitivity) reactions included urticaria, erythema, and rash and 1 of the 3 reactions occurred on the day of dosing.
Other systemic reactions were reported by no patients in the group receiving NUCALA 100 mg and <1% of patients in the placebo group. Injection Site Reactions: Injection site reactions (e.g., erythema, pruritus) occurred at a rate of 2% in patients receiving NUCALA 100 mg compared with <1% in patients receiving placebo. Adverse Reactions in Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The safety data below reflects the safety of NUCALA in adults with inadequately controlled COPD and an eosinophilic phenotype.
Trial 3 enrolled COPD adults with a peripheral blood eosinophil count ≥150 cells/µL at screening or ≥300 cells/µL in the year prior. Table 4 summarizes adverse reactions that occurred in ≥3% of patients treated with NUCALA and more frequently than in patients treated with placebo in COPD trials. Table 4.
Adverse Reactions in Patients with Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis A total of 136 patients with EGPA were evaluated in 1 randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 52-week treatment trial. Patients enrolled had a diagnosis of EGPA for at least 6 months prior to enrollment with a history of relapsing or refractory disease and were on a stable dosage of oral prednisolone or prednisone of greater than or equal to 7.5 mg/day (but not greater than 50 mg/day) for at least 4 weeks prior to enrollment. No additional adverse reactions were identified to those reported in the severe asthma trials.
Systemic Reactions, including Hypersensitivity Reactions: In the 52-week trial, the percentage of patients who experienced systemic (allergic and non‑allergic) reactions was 6% in the group receiving 300 mg of NUCALA and 1% in the placebo group. The manifestations of systemic allergic/hypersensitivity reactions reported in the group receiving 300 mg of NUCALA included rash, pruritus, flushing, fatigue, hypertension, warm sensation in trunk and neck, cold extremities, dyspnea, and stridor. Systemic non-allergic reactions were reported by 1 (1%) patient in the group receiving 300 mg of NUCALA and no patients in the placebo group.
The reported manifestation of systemic non-allergic reactions reported in the group receiving 300 mg of NUCALA was angioedema. Half of the systemic reactions in patients receiving 300 mg of NUCALA (2/4) were experienced on the day of dosing. Injection Site Reactions: Injection site reactions (e.g., pain, erythema, swelling) occurred at a rate of 15% in patients receiving 300 mg of NUCALA compared with 13% in patients receiving placebo.
Adverse Reactions in Adult and Adolescent Patients with Hypereosinophilic Syndrome A total of 108 adult and adolescent patients aged 12 years and older with HES were evaluated in a randomized, placebo‑controlled, multicenter, 32-week treatment trial. Patients with non-hematologic secondary HES or FIP1L1‑PDGFRα kinase-positive HES were excluded from the trial. Patients must have been on a stable dose of background HES therapy for the 4 weeks prior to randomization.
Systemic Reactions, including Hypersensitivity Reactions: In the trial, no systemic allergic (type I hypersensitivity) reactions were reported. The reported manifestation of other systemic reaction was multifocal skin reaction experienced on the day of dosing. Injection Site Reactions: Injection site reactions (e.g., burning, itching) occurred at a rate of 7% in patients receiving 300 mg of NUCALA compared with 4% in patients receiving placebo.
Postmarketing Experience
In addition to adverse reactions reported from clinical trials, the following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of NUCALA. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. These events have been chosen for inclusion due to either their seriousness, frequency of reporting, or causal connection to NUCALA or a combination of these factors.
Immune System Disorders Hypersensitivity reactions, including anaphylaxis.
| Adverse Reaction | NUCALA (Mepolizumab 100 mg Subcutaneous) (n = 263) % | Placebo (n = 257) % |
|---|---|---|
| Headache | 19 | 18 |
| Injection site reaction | 8 | 3 |
| Back pain | 5 | 4 |
| Fatigue | 5 | 4 |
| Influenza | 3 | 2 |
| Urinary tract infection | 3 | 2 |
| Abdominal pain upper | 3 | 2 |
| Pruritus | 3 | 2 |
| Eczema | 3 | <1 |
| Muscle spasms | 3 | <1 |
| Adverse Reaction | NUCALA (Mepolizumab 100 mg Subcutaneous) (n = 206) % | Placebo (n = 201) % |
|---|---|---|
| Oropharyngeal pain | 8 | 5 |
| Arthralgia | 6 | 2 |
| Abdominal pain upper | 3 | 2 |
| Diarrhea | 3 | 2 |
| Pyrexia | 3 | 2 |
| Nasal dryness | 3 | <1 |
| Rash | 3 | <1 |
| Adverse Reaction | NUCALA (Mepolizumab 100 mg Subcutaneous) (n = 1043) % | Placebo (n = 1046) % |
|---|---|---|
| Back pain | 7 | 6 |
| Diarrhea | 5 | 4 |
| Cough | 5 | 4 |
| Oropharyngeal pain | 4 | 2 |
| Urinary tract infection | 4 | 3 |
| Pain in extremity | 4 | 3 |
Warnings & Cautions for Nucala
Hypersensitivity Reactions
Hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis, angioedema, bronchospasm, hypotension, urticaria, rash) have occurred following administration of NUCALA. These reactions generally occur within hours of administration, but in some instances can have a delayed onset (i.e., days). In the event of a hypersensitivity reaction, NUCALA should be discontinued.
Acute Symptoms of Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease or Acute Deteriorating Disease NUCALA should not be used to treat acute symptoms or acute exacerbations of asthma or COPD. Do not use NUCALA to treat acute bronchospasm or status asthmaticus. Patients should seek medical advice if their asthma or COPD remains uncontrolled or worsens after initiation of treatment with NUCALA.
Opportunistic Infections: Herpes Zoster
Herpes zoster has occurred in subjects receiving NUCALA 100 mg in controlled clinical trials. Consider vaccination if medically appropriate.
Reduction of Corticosteroid Dosage
Do not discontinue systemic or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) abruptly upon initiation of therapy with NUCALA. Reductions in corticosteroid dosage, if appropriate, should be gradual and performed under the direct supervision of a physician. Reduction in corticosteroid dosage may be associated with systemic withdrawal symptoms and/or unmask conditions previously suppressed by systemic corticosteroid therapy.
Parasitic (Helminth) Infection Eosinophils may be involved in the immunological response to some helminth infections. Patients with known parasitic infections were excluded from participation in clinical trials. It is unknown if NUCALA will influence a patient’s response against parasitic infections.
Treat patients with pre-existing helminth infections before initiating therapy with NUCALA. If patients become infected while receiving treatment with NUCALA and do not respond to anti-helminth treatment, discontinue treatment with NUCALA until infection resolves.
Drug Interactions with Nucala
Formal drug interaction trials have not been performed with NUCALA.
Pregnancy Safety for Nucala
Pregnancy Risk Summary The data on pregnancy exposure are insufficient to inform on drug-associated risk. Monoclonal antibodies, such as mepolizumab, are transported across the placenta in a linear fashion as pregnancy progresses; therefore, potential effects on a fetus are likely to be greater during the second and third trimester of pregnancy. In a prenatal and postnatal development study conducted in cynomolgus monkeys, there was no evidence of fetal harm with intravenous administration of mepolizumab throughout pregnancy at doses that produced exposures up to approximately 9 times the exposure at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 300 mg subcutaneous (see Data).
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is respectively. Clinical Considerations Disease-Associated Maternal and/or Embryofetal Risk: In women with poorly or moderately controlled asthma, evidence demonstrates that there is an increased risk of preeclampsia in the mother and prematurity, low birth weight, and small for gestational age in the neonate. The level of asthma control should be closely monitored in pregnant women and treatment adjusted as necessary to maintain optimal control.
Data Animal Data: In a prenatal and postnatal development study, pregnant cynomolgus monkeys received mepolizumab from gestation Days 20 to 140 at doses that produced exposures up to approximately 9 times that achieved with the MRHD (on an AUC basis with maternal intravenous doses up to 100 mg/kg once every 4 weeks). Mepolizumab did not elicit adverse effects on fetal or neonatal growth (including immune function) up to 9 months after birth. Examinations for internal or skeletal malformations were not performed.
Mepolizumab crossed the placenta in cynomolgus monkeys. Concentrations of mepolizumab were approximately 2.4 times higher in infants than in mothers up to Day 178 postpartum. Levels of mepolizumab in milk were ≤0.5% of maternal serum concentration.
In a fertility, early embryonic, and embryofetal development study, pregnant CD-1 mice received an analogous antibody, which inhibits the activity of murine interleukin-5 (IL-5), at an intravenous dose of 50 mg/kg once per week throughout gestation. The analogous antibody was not teratogenic in mice. Embryofetal development of IL-5–deficient mice has been reported to be generally unaffected relative to wild-type mice.
Pediatric Use of Nucala
Pediatric Use Severe Asthma The safety and effectiveness of NUCALA for severe asthma, and with an eosinophilic phenotype, have been established in pediatric patients aged 6 years and older. Use of NUCALA in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled trials in adults and adolescents. Of these, 25 were enrolled in the 32-week exacerbation trial (MENSA) and had a mean age of 14.8 years.
Patients had a history of 2 or more exacerbations in the previous year despite regular use of medium- or high-dose ICS plus additional controller(s) with or without OCS and had blood eosinophils of ≥150 cells/mcL at screening or ≥300 cells/mcL within 12 months prior to enrollment. Patients had a reduction in the rate of exacerbations that trended in favor of NUCALA. The safety profile observed in adolescents was generally similar to that of the overall population in the Phase 3 studies.
Enrollment criteria were the same as for adolescents in the 32-week exacerbation trial (MENSA). Based upon the pharmacokinetic data from this trial, a subcutaneous dose of 40 mg every 4 weeks was determined to have similar exposure to adults and adolescents administered a subcutaneous dose of 100 mg. The effectiveness of NUCALA in pediatric patients aged 6 to 11 years is extrapolated from efficacy in adults and adolescents with support from pharmacokinetic analyses showing similar drug exposure levels for 40 mg administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks in children aged 6 to 11 years compared with adults and adolescents.
The safety profile and pharmacodynamic response observed in this trial for children aged 6 to 11 years were similar to that seen in adults and adolescents. The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients aged younger than 6 years with severe asthma have not been established. Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps The safety and effectiveness in patients aged younger than 18 years with CRSwNP have not been established.
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients aged younger than 18 years with COPD have not been established. COPD is largely a disease of adult patients. Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis The safety and effectiveness in patients aged younger than 18 years with EGPA have not been established.
Hypereosinophilic Syndrome The safety and effectiveness of NUCALA for HES have been established in adolescent patients aged 12 years and older. The safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients aged younger than 12 years with HES have not been established. Use of NUCALA for this indication is supported by evidence from an adequate and well-controlled study (NCT02836496) in adults and adolescents and an open-label extension study (NCT03306043).
One adolescent received NUCALA during the controlled study and this patient and an additional 3 adolescents received NUCALA during the open-label extension study. The 1 adolescent treated with NUCALA in the 32-week trial did not have a HES flare or an adverse event reported. All adolescents received 300 mg of NUCALA for 20 weeks in the open-label extension.
Contraindications for Nucala
NUCALA is contraindicated in patients with a history of hypersensitivity to mepolizumab or excipients in the formulation.
Overdosage Information for Nucala
There is no specific treatment for an overdose with mepolizumab. If overdose occurs, the patient should be treated supportively with appropriate monitoring as necessary. Consider contacting the Poison Help line (1-800-222-1222) or a medical toxicologist for additional overdose management recommendations.
Clinical Studies of Nucala
Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps
A total of 407 adult patients with CRSwNP were evaluated in a randomized, double‑blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 52-week trial (NCT03085797). Patients received NUCALA 100 mg or placebo administered subcutaneously once every 4 weeks while continuing nasal corticosteroid therapy. Patients must have received background nasal corticosteroid for ≥8 weeks pre‑screening.
Patients had recurrent and symptomatic CRSwNP, and had at least 1 surgery for the removal of nasal polyps within the previous 10 years. Patients were required to have nasal obstruction symptoms with a visual analog scale (VAS) score of >5 out of a maximum score of 10. Patients were also required to have an endoscopic bilateral nasal polyp score (NPS) of ≥5 out of 8 with NPS ≥2 in each nasal cavity.
Patients reported nasal obstruction VAS scores daily by placing a single mark on a continuous line labeled from 0 (none) to 100 (as bad as you can imagine). The distance along the line was converted to a 0 to 10 point scale for scoring. For NPS, polyps on each side of the nose were graded on a categorical scale (0 = no polyps, 1 = small polyps in the middle meatus not reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, 2 = polyps reaching below the lower border of the middle turbinate, 3 = large polyps reaching the lower border of the inferior turbinate or polyps medial to the middle concha, 4 = large polyps causing almost complete congestion/obstruction of the inferior meatus) for a total score of 0 to 8.
Sinus CT scans were not performed at baseline nor during treatment to evaluate for sinus opacification. The key secondary endpoint was the time to first nasal surgery (nasal polypectomy) up to Week 52 in this trial. Other secondary endpoints were change from baseline in loss of smell VAS score during Weeks 49 to 52, and proportion of patients requiring systemic steroids for nasal polyps up to Week 52.
The demographics and baseline characteristics of patients in this trial are provided in Table 8. Table 8. Demographics and Baseline Characteristics in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps 108 Endoscopic Nasal Polyp Score and Nasal Obstruction Visual Analog Scale Scores Patients who received NUCALA 100 mg had a statistically significant improvement (decrease) in bilateral NPS at Week 52 and nasal obstruction VAS score from Weeks 49 to 52 at the end of the 52 week treatment period ( Table 9 ).
Table 9. Analyses of Endpoints in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Nasal Polypectomy The key secondary endpoint was the time to first nasal surgery (nasal polypectomy) up to Week 52. The proportion of patients who had surgery was significantly reduced by 57% hazard ratio: in the group treated with NUCALA 100 mg compared with the placebo group ( Figure 2 ).
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier Plot of Time to First Nasal Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps SC = subcutaneous. Additional Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps Symptoms Scores For patients who received NUCALA 100 mg, statistically significant improvement was observed in loss of smell compared to placebo and improvements were also observed in the individual VAS symptom scores compared with patients in the placebo group in the 4-weeks prior to the end of the 52-week treatment period ( Table 10 ).
Table 10: Additional Visual Analog Scale Symptom Scores Assessed at Weeks with NUCALA 100 mg significantly reduced the need for systemic steroids for nasal polyps vs. placebo up to Week Results in Patients with Co-Morbid Asthma In 289 (71%) patients with co-morbid asthma, pre-specified analyses showed improvements in the co-primary endpoints consistent with those seen in the overall population in the patients who received NUCALA 100 mg compared with placebo. Additionally, based on a post-hoc analysis in these patients, there was a greater response from baseline at Week 52 in asthma control as measured by the ACQ‑5 for NUCALA 100 mg compared with placebo (57% of the NUCALA patients met the responder threshold reduction of ≥0.5, compared to 35% in the placebo group, with an OR of 2.42 ). Figure 2
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
The efficacy of NUCALA as add-on maintenance treatment for adult patients with inadequately controlled chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and an eosinophilic phenotype was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials (MATINEE and METREX ). While 1640 adults were enrolled in the two clinical trials (MATINEE and METREX), the efficacy population consisted of 1266 adults. In MATINEE, patients were required to have a minimum blood eosinophil count of 300 cell/mcL at screening.
In METREX, there was no minimum blood eosinophil count requirement, but randomization was stratified by baseline blood eosinophil count: ≥150 cell/mcL at screening or ≥300 cell/mcL in the previous 12 months, or blood eosinophil count <150 cells/mcL at screening with no evidence of blood eosinophil count ≥300 cell/mcL in the previous 12 months. There was insufficient data from METREX to support the efficacy of NUCALA in patients with COPD with blood eosinophil count <150 cells/mcL at screening with no evidence of blood eosinophil count ≥300 cell/mcL in the previous 12 months. The data from this efficacy population is described below.
The demographic and baseline characteristics of MATINEE and METREX efficacy population are provided in Table 11 below. Table 11: Demographics and Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in of Moderate or Severe Exacerbations in Adult Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease The primary endpoint for the MATINEE and METREX trials was the annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations during the 52 to 104-week and 52-week treatment periods, respectively. Moderate exacerbations are defined per protocol as clinically significant exacerbations that require treatment with oral/systemic corticosteroids and/or antibiotics.
Severe exacerbations are defined per protocol as clinically significant exacerbations that require in‑patient hospitalization (i.e., ≥24 hours) or result in death. In both trials, NUCALA demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the annualized rate of moderate or severe exacerbations compared with placebo when added to triple inhaled therapy (see Table 12 ). Table 12.
Annualized Rate of Moderate a or Severe b Exacerbations in 0.79 0.82 The time to first event analysis showed a statistically significant reduction in the risk of moderate or severe exacerbation for patients receiving NUCALA compared to placebo HR: through 104 weeks in MATINEE. NUCALA reduced the annualized rate of COPD exacerbations requiring emergency department visits and/or hospitalization when compared with placebo (rate ratio of ) in MATINEE. Health Related Quality of Life In MATINEE and METREX, the St.
George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score responder rate (defined as the proportion of subjects with SGRQ improvement from baseline of at least 4 points) at Week 52 was evaluated. In MATINEE, the responder rate was 50% in the NUCALA group compared with 46% in the placebo group N = 783, odds ratio: In the METREX efficacy population, the responder rate was 42% in the NUCALA group compared to 40% in the placebo group N = 451, odds ratio: Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis A total of 136 adult patients with EGPA were evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 52-week trial (NCT02020889). Patients received 300 mg of NUCALA or placebo administered subcutaneously once every 4 weeks while continuing their stable OCS therapy.
Starting at Week 4, OCS was tapered during the treatment period at the discretion of the investigator. Efficacy was assessed in this trial using co-endpoints of the total accrued duration of remission over the 52-week treatment period, defined as Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) = 0 (no active vasculitis) plus prednisolone or prednisone dose less than or equal to 4 mg/day, and the proportion of patients in remission at both Week 36 and Week 48 of treatment. The BVAS is a clinician-completed tool to assess clinically active vasculitis that would likely require treatment, after exclusion of other causes.
Table 13. Demographics and Baseline Characteristics in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis 72 Remission Patients receiving 300 mg of NUCALA achieved a significantly greater accrued time in remission compared with placebo. Results of the components of remission are also shown in Table 14.
In addition, significantly more patients receiving 300 mg of NUCALA achieved remission within the first 24 weeks and remained in remission for the remainder of the 52-week trial treatment period compared with placebo 19% for 300 mg of NUCALA versus 1% for placebo; OR: Table 14. Remission and Components of Remission in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Additionally, a statistically significant benefit for these endpoints was demonstrated using remission defined as BVAS = 0 plus prednisolone/prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day. Relapse The time to first relapse (defined as worsening related to vasculitis, asthma, or sino-nasal symptoms requiring an increase in dose of corticosteroids or immunosuppressive therapy or hospitalization) was significantly longer for patients receiving 300 mg of NUCALA compared with placebo with an HR of ( Figure 3 ).
Additionally, patients receiving 300 mg of NUCALA had a reduction in rate of relapse compared with patients receiving placebo (RR: mg of NUCALA compared with placebo). The incidence and number of relapse types (vasculitis, asthma, sino-nasal) were numerically lower with NUCALA compared with placebo. Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier Plot of Time to First Relapse in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis SC = subcutaneous. Table 15. Average Daily Oral Corticosteroid Dose during Weeks 48 to 52 in Eosinophilic Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6) The ACQ-6, a 6-item questionnaire completed by the patient, was developed to measure the adequacy of asthma control and change in asthma control.
Patients with non-hematologic secondary HES (e.g., drug hypersensitivity, parasitic helminth infection, HIV infection, non-hematologic malignancy) or FIP1L1-PDGFRα kinase-positive HES were excluded from the trial. Patients received 300 mg of NUCALA or placebo subcutaneous once every 4 weeks while continuing their stable HES therapy. Patients entering the trial had experienced at least 2 HES flares within the past 12 months and a blood eosinophil count of 1,000 cells/mcL or higher during screening.
Historical HES flares for the trial entry criteria were defined as HES‑related worsening of clinical symptoms or blood eosinophil counts requiring an escalation in therapy. Patients must have been on stable HES therapy for the 4 weeks prior to randomization. HES therapy could include chronic or episodic OCS, immunosuppressive, or cytotoxic therapy.
The efficacy of NUCALA in HES was established based upon the proportion of patients who experienced a HES flare during the 32-week treatment period. A HES flare was defined as worsening of clinical signs and symptoms of HES or increasing eosinophils (on at least 2 occasions), resulting in the need to increase OCS or increase/add cytotoxic or immunosuppressive HES therapy. Table 16.
Demographics and Baseline Characteristics in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Flares The trial compared the proportion of patients who experienced a HES flare or withdrew from the trial in the NUCALA and placebo treatment groups ( Table 17 ). Over the 32-week treatment period, the incidence of HES flare over the treatment period was 56% for the placebo group and 28% for the group treated with NUCALA (50% reduction). Table 17.
Overview of Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Flares was observed between NUCALA and placebo arms in the time to first HES flare ( Figure 4). The risk of first HES flare over the treatment period was 66% lower for patients treated with NUCALA compared with placebo (HR: P = 0.002). Figure 4.
Kaplan-Meier Curve for Time to First Hypereosinophilic Syndrome Flare SC = subcutaneous. Rate of Flares Patients who received NUCALA experienced significantly fewer HES flares during the 32-week treatment period compared with the placebo group ( Table 18 ). Treatment with NUCALA resulted in a statistically significant 66% reduction in the annualized rate of HES flares compared with placebo.
Table 18. Frequency of Flares Brief Fatigue Inventory Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) Item 3 asks patients to record their worst level of weariness/tiredness severity during the past 24 hours (scale: 0 = no fatigue to 10 = as bad as you can imagine). At Week 32, BFI Item 3 scores improved with NUCALA compared with placebo ( P = 0.036).
Figure 4
| FEV 1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, SABA = short-acting beta 2 -agonist, FVC = forced vital capacity. | |||
| DREAM (N = 616) | MENSA (N = 576) | SIRIUS (N = 135) | |
| Mean age, years | 49 | 50 | 50 |
| Female, n (%) | 387 (63) | 328 (57) | 74 (55) |
| White, n (%) | 554 (90) | 450 (78) | 128 (95) |
| Duration of asthma, years, mean | 19 | 20 | 19 |
| Never smoked, n (%) | 483 (78) | 417 (72) | 82 (61) |
| Baseline FEV 1, L | 1.88 | 1.82 | 1.95 |
| Baseline % predicted FEV 1 | 60 | 61 | 59 |
| Baseline % reversibility | 25 | 27 | 26 |
| Baseline post-SABA FEV 1 /FVC | 0.67 | 0.66 | 0.66 |
| Geometric mean eosinophil count at baseline, cells/mcL | 250 | 290 | 240 |
| Mean number of exacerbations in previous year | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.1 |
| CI = confidence interval, IV = intravenous, SC = subcutaneous. | ||||
| Trial | Treatment | Exacerbations per Year | ||
| Rate | Difference | Rate Ratio (95% CI) | ||
| All exacerbations | ||||
| DREAM | Placebo (n = 155) | 2.40 | ||
| Mepolizumab 75 mg IV (n = 153) | 1.24 | 1.16 | 0.52 (0.39, 0.69) | |
| MENSA | Placebo (n = 191) | 1.74 | ||
| Mepolizumab 75 mg IV (n = 191) | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.53 (0.40, 0.72) | |
| NUCALA 100 mg SC (n = 194) | 0.83 | 0.91 | 0.47 (0.35, 0.64) | |
| Exacerbations requiring hospitalization/emergency room visit | ||||
| DREAM | Placebo (n = 155) | 0.43 | ||
| Mepolizumab 75 mg IV (n = 153) | 0.17 | 0.26 | 0.40 (0.19, 0.81) | |
| MENSA | Placebo (n = 191) | 0.20 | ||
| Mepolizumab 75 mg IV (n = 191) | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.68 (0.33, 1.41) | |
| NUCALA 100 mg SC (n = 194) | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.39 (0.18, 0.83) | |
| Exacerbations requiring hospitalization | ||||
| DREAM | Placebo (n = 155) | 0.18 | ||
| Mepolizumab 75 mg IV (n = 153) | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.61 (0.28, 1.33) | |
| MENSA | Placebo (n = 191) | 0.10 | ||
| Mepolizumab 75 mg IV (n = 191) | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.61 (0.23, 1.66) | |
| NUCALA 100 mg SC (n = 194) | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.31 (0.11, 0.91) | |
| FEV 1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, CI = confidence interval. | |||
| a Dose = 75 mg intravenous. | |||
| b FEV 1 at Week 52. | |||
| c Dose = 100 mg subcutaneous. | |||
| d FEV 1 at Week 32. | |||
| Trial | Difference from Placebo in Mean Change from Baseline FEV 1 (mL) (95% CI) | ||
| Week 12 | Week 24 | Weeks 32/52 | |
| DREAM a | 10 (-87, 108) | 5 (-98, 108) | 61 (-39, 161) b |
| MENSA c | 52 (-30, 134) | 76 (-6, 159) | 98 (11, 184) d |
| SIRIUS c | 56 (-91, 203) | 114 (-42, 271) | NA |
| CRSwNP = chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, SD = standard deviation, OCS = oral corticosteroid, NPS = nasal polyp score, VAS = visual analog scale, CI = confidence interval, AERD = aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. a As graded by independent blinded assessors. | |
| N = 407 | |
| Mean age, years | 49 |
| Female, n (%) | 143 (35) |
| White, n (%) | 379 (93) |
| Mean CRSwNP duration in years (SD) | 11.4 (8.4) |
| Patients with ≥1 surgery in past 10 years (%) | 407 (100) |
| Patients with ≥3 surgeries in past 10 years (%) | 124 (30) |
| OCS use (≥1 course) in past 12 months, n (%) | 197 (48) |
| Mean bilateral endoscopic NPS a, (SD), range 0-8 | 5.5 (1.29) |
| Mean nasal obstruction VAS score, (SD), range 0-10 | 9.0 (0.83) |
| Geometric mean blood eosinophil cells/mcL (95% CI) | 390 (360, 420) |
| Asthma, n (%) | 289 (71) |
| AERD, n (%) | 108 (27) |
| SD = standard deviation, SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval, NPS = nasal polyp score at Week 52. | |||||
| a Patients with nasal surgery were assigned worst possible score for the period after nasal surgery. Missing data were imputed based on available off-treatment data across treatment arms. Imputations were made stepwise by visit and conditioned on data from previous visits with the same covariates used in the analysis model. | |||||
| b Least square means from analysis using mixed model repeated measures with covariates of treatment group, geographic region, baseline score, and log(e) baseline blood eosinophil count, visit, interaction terms for visit by baseline and visit by treatment. | |||||
| Scores a (range) | Placebo n = 201 | NUCALA 100 mg n = 206 | Mean Difference vs. Placebo (95% CI) | ||
| Baseline Mean (SD) | Mean Change b (SE) | Baseline Mean (SD) | Mean Change b (SE) | ||
| NPS (0-8) | 5.6 (1.41) | 0.06 (0.14) | 5.4 (1.17) | -0.87 (0.14) | -0.93 (-1.31, -0.55) |
| Nasal obstruction (0-10) | 9.02 (0.83) | -2.54 (0.25) | 8.92 (0.83) | -4.40 (0.25) | -1.86 (-2.53, -1.19) |
| VAS = visual analog scale, SD = standard deviation, SE = standard error, CI = confidence interval. | |||||
| a Patients with nasal surgery were assigned the worst possible score for the period after nasal surgery. Missing data was imputed based on available off-treatment data across treatment arms. Imputations were made stepwise by visit and conditioned on data from previous visits with the same covariates used in the analysis model. | |||||
| b Least square means from an analysis using mixed model repeated measures with covariates of treatment group, geographic region, baseline score, and log(e) baseline blood eosinophil count visit, interaction terms for visit by baseline and visit by treatment. | |||||
| c This endpoint was not prespecified in the analysis plan to adjust for multiplicity. | |||||
| VAS Scores a (range) | Placebo n = 201 | NUCALA 100 mg n = 206 | Mean Difference vs. Placebo (95% CI) | ||
| Baseline Mean (SD) | Mean Change b (SE) | Baseline Mean (SD) | Mean Change b (SE) | ||
| Loss of smell (0-10) | 9.68 (0.60) | -1.46 (0.24) | 9.63 (0.83) | -2.92 (0.24) | -1.46 (-2.11, -0.81) |
| Nasal discharge c (0-10) | 8.78 (1.25) | -2.49 (0.26) | 8.78 (1.07) | -4.38 (0.25) | -1.89 (-2.58, -1.20) |
| Mucus in the throat c (0-10) | 8.58 (1.63) | -2.37 (0.26) | 8.51 (1.61) | -4.07 (0.26) | -1.70 (-2.41, -0.99) |
| Facial pain c (0-10) | 7.77 (2.72) | -2.04 (0.28) | 7.76 (2.51) | -3.73 (0.27) | -1.69 (-2.43, -0.95) |
| SD = standard deviation, FEV 1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 second, FVC = forced vital capacity, COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, ICS = inhaled corticosteroids, LAMA = long-acting muscarinic antagonist, LABA = long-acting beta agonist, SGRQ = St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire, CI = confidence interval. | ||
| a Patients with blood eosinophil count ≥150 cell/mcL at screening or ≥300 cell/mcL in the previous 12 months only. | ||
| b Exacerbations treated with either systemic corticosteroids with or without antibiotics. | ||
| c Exacerbations requiring hospitalization. | ||
| MATINEE | METREX a | |
| N = 804 | N = 462 | |
| Mean age (y) (SD) | 66 (8.0) | 65 (8.4) |
| Female, n (%) | 253 (31) | 163 (35) |
| White, n (%) | 673 (84) | 391 (85) |
| Asian, n (%) | 112 (14) | 5 (1) |
| Black or African American, n (%) | 10 (1) | 6 (1) |
| Other/Multiple, n (%) | 9 (1) | 60 (13) |
| Hispanic/Latino, n (%) | 189 (24) | 75 (16) |
| Current smokers, n (%) | 222 (28) | 134 (29) |
| Average smoking history (pack-years) (SD) | 43 (24.9) | 44 (25.8) |
| Post-bronchodilator % predicted FEV 1, mean (SD) | 48 (15.8) | 44 (14.8) |
| Post-bronchodilator FEV 1 /FVC, mean (SD) | 0.5 (0.12) | 0.5 (0.12) |
| Mean number of moderate b or severe c exacerbations in previous year (SD) | 2.3 (0.94) | 2.5 (1.29) |
| Background COPD medications at randomization: ICS/LAMA/LABA, n (%) | 794 (99) | 454 (98) |
| SGRQ score, mean (SD) | 55 (17.8) | 55 (16.7) |
| Geometric mean eosinophil count at screening, cells/mcL (95% CI) | 480 (470, 490) | 260 (250, 280) |
| CI = confidence interval. | ||||
| a Exacerbations treated with either systemic corticosteroids/antibiotics. | ||||
| b Exacerbations requiring hospitalization or resulting in death. | ||||
| c Patients with baseline eosinophils > 150 cell/mcL at screening or ≥300 cell/mcL in the previous 12 months. | ||||
| MATINEE | METREX c | |||
| NUCALA N = 403 | Placebo N = 401 | NUCALA N = 233 | Placebo N = 229 | |
| Exacerbation rate per year | 0.80 | 1.01 | 1.40 | 1.71 |
| Rate ratio vs. placebo (95% CI) | 0.79 (0.66, 0.94) | 0.82 (0.68, 0.98) | ||
| EGPA = eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, SD = standard deviation. | |
| a Prednisone or prednisolone equivalent. | |
| b e.g., azathioprine, methotrexate, mycophenolic acid. | |
| N = 136 | |
| Mean age, years | 48.5 |
| Female, n (%) | 80 (59) |
| White, n (%) | 125 (92) |
| Duration of EGPA, years, mean (SD) | 5.5 (4.63) |
| History of > 1 confirmed relapse in past 2 years, n (%) | 100 (74) |
| Refractory disease, n (%) | 74 (54) |
| Recurrence of EGPA symptoms, n (%) | 68 (50) |
| Failed induction treatment, n (%) | 6 (4) |
| Baseline oral corticosteroid a daily dose, mg, median (range) | 12 (7.5-50) |
| Receiving immunosuppressive therapy, b n (%) | 72 (53) |
| OCS = oral corticosteroid, BVAS = Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, CI = confidence interval. a An odds ratio >1 favors NUCALA. | ||||||
| Remission (OCS ≤4 mg/day + BVAS = 0) | OCS ≤4 mg/day | BVAS = 0 | ||||
| Placebo n = 68 | NUCALA 300 mg n = 68 | Placebo n = 68 | NUCALA 300 mg n = 68 | Placebo n = 68 | NUCALA 300 mg n = 68 | |
| Accrued duration over 52 weeks, n (%) | ||||||
| 0 | 55 (81) | 32 (47) | 46 (68) | 27 (40) | 6 (9) | 3 (4) |
| >0 to <12 weeks | 8 (12) | 8 (12) | 12 (18) | 5 (7) | 15 (22) | 13 (19) |
| 12 to <24 weeks | 3 (4) | 9 (13) | 6 (9) | 12 (18) | 11 (16) | 5 (7) |
| 24 to <36 weeks | 0 | 10 (15) | 2 (3) | 10 (15) | 17 (25) | 2 (3) |
| ≥36 weeks | 2 (3) | 9 (13) | 2 (3) | 14 (21) | 19 (28) | 45 (66) |
| Odds ratio (NUCALA/placebo) a | 5.9 | 5.1 | 3.7 | |||
| (95% CI) | (2.7, 13.0) | (2.5, 10.4) | (1.8, 7.6) | |||
| Proportion of patients at both Weeks 36 and 48 | ||||||
| Patients, n (%) | 2 (3) | 22 (32) | 7 (10) | 28 (41) | 23 (34) | 34 (50) |
| Odds ratio (NUCALA/placebo) a | 16.7 | 6.6 | 1.9 | |||
| (95% CI) | (3.6, 77.6) | (2.6, 17.1) | (0.9, 4.2) | |||
| CI = confidence interval. a Analyzed using a proportional odds model with covariates of treatment group, baseline oral corticosteroid daily dose, baseline Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score, and region. b An odds ratio <1 favors NUCALA. | ||
| Number (%) of Patients | ||
| Placebo n = 68 | NUCALA 300 mg n = 68 | |
| 0 | 2 (3) | 12 (18) |
| >0 to ≤4.0 mg | 3 (4) | 18 (26) |
| >4.0 to ≤7.5 mg | 18 (26) | 10 (15) |
| >7.5 mg | 45 (66) | 28 (41) |
| Comparison: NUCALA/placebo a | ||
| Odds ratio b | 0.20 | |
| 95% CI | 0.09, 0.41 | |
| SD = standard deviation, HES = Hypereosinophilic Syndrome. | |
| N = 108 | |
| Mean age, years (SD) | 46.0 (15.78) |
| Female, n (%) | 57 (53) |
| White, n (%) | 100 (93) |
| Mean duration of HES, years | 5.55 |
| HES = Hypereosinophilic Syndrome, CMH = Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, CI = confidence interval. a Analysis compared the number of patients who experienced ≥1 HES flare and/or withdrew from the trial prematurely. b An odds ratio <1 favors NUCALA. | ||
| Number (%) of Patients | ||
| Placebo n = 54 | NUCALA 300 mg n = 54 | |
| Patients with ≥1 HES flare or who withdrew from trial | 30 (56) | 15 (28) |
| Patients with ≥1 HES flare | 28 (52) | 14 (26) |
| Patients with no HES flare who withdrew from trial | 2 (4) | 1 (2) |
| Comparison: NUCALA/placebo a | ||
| CMH P value | 0.002 | |
| Odds ratio b | 0.28 | |
| 95% CI | (0.12, 0.64) | |
| CI = confidence interval. a Adjusted P values based on pre-specified hierarchy of endpoints. b A rate ratio <1 favors NUCALA. | ||
| Number (%) of Patients | ||
| Placebo n = 54 | NUCALA 300 mg n = 54 | |
| 0 | 26 (48) | 40 (74) |
| 1 | 15 (28) | 11 (20) |
| 2 | 7 (13) | 3 (6) |
| 3 | 5 (9) | 0 |
| 4 | 1 (2) | 0 |
| ≥5 | 0 | 0 |
| Comparison: NUCALA/placebo | ||
| Wilcoxon P value (unadjusted/adjusted) a | 0.002/0.02 | |
| Rate/year | 1.46 | 0.50 |
| Rate ratio b | 0.34 | |
| 95% CI | (0.19, 0.63) | |
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Nucala?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Nucala Prices