Noxafil Drug Information

Generic name: POSACONAZOLE

Azole Antifungal [EPC]

Save on Noxafil at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Noxafil

Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis Noxafil is indicated for the treatment of invasive

aspergillosis as follows: Noxafil injection: adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh 10 kg or greater Noxafil delayed-release tablets: adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh greater than 40 kg Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension: pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh 10 to 40 kg

Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections Noxafil is indicated for the

prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in patients who are at high risk of developing these infections due to being severely immunocompromised, such as hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) or those with hematologic malignancies with prolonged neutropenia from chemotherapy as follows: Noxafil injection: adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh 10 kg or greater Noxafil delayed-release tablets: adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh greater than 40 kg Noxafil oral suspension: adults and pediatric patients 13 years of age and older Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension: pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh 10 kg to 40 kg

Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Including Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Refractory to Itraconazole and/or Fluconazole

Noxafil oral suspension is indicated for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis, including oropharyngeal candidiasis refractory to itraconazole and/or fluconazole in adults and pediatric patients 13 years of age and older.

Dosage & Administration of Noxafil

Treatment of Invasive AspergillosisSwitching between the Noxafil injection and delayed-release tablets is acceptable. A loading dose is not required when switching between dosage forms.
Noxafil Injection:Loading dose: 300 mg Noxafil injection intravenously twice a day on the first day. Maintenance dose: 300 mg Noxafil injection intravenously once a day, starting on the second day. Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets: Loading dose: 300 mg (three 100 mg delayed-release tablets) twice a day on the first day. Maintenance dose: 300 mg (three 100 mg delayed-release tablets) once a day, starting on the second day.Loading dose: 1 day Maintenance dose: Recommended total duration of therapy is 6 to 12 weeks.
Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections
Noxafil Injection: Loading dose: 300 mg Noxafil injection intravenously twice a day on the first day. Maintenance dose: 300 mg Noxafil injection intravenously once a day thereafter. Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets: Loading dose: 300 mg (three 100 mg delayed-release tablets) twice a day on the first day. Maintenance dose: 300 mg (three 100 mg delayed-release tablets) once a day, starting on the second day. Noxafil Oral Suspension: 200 mg (5 mL) three times a day.Loading dose: 1 day Maintenance dose: Duration of therapy is based on recovery from neutropenia or immunosuppression
Oropharyngeal Candidiasis (OPC)
Noxafil Oral Suspension: Loading dose: 100 mg (2.5 mL) twice a day on the first day. Maintenance dose: 100 mg (2.5 mL) once a day thereafter.Loading dose: 1 day Maintenance dose: 13 days
OPC Refractory (rOPC) to Itraconazole and/or Fluconazole
Noxafil Oral Suspension: 400 mg (10 mL) twice a day.Duration of therapy is based on the severity of the patient’s underlying disease and clinical response.

Side Effects of Noxafil

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in clinical trials of Noxafil cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis in Adults and Adolescents (Noxafil injection and Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets) The safety of Noxafil injection and Noxafil delayed-release tablets was assessed in a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled clinical study of Noxafil injection and Noxafil delayed-release tablets versus voriconazole for treatment of invasive aspergillosis (Aspergillosis Treatment Study). A total of 575 adult and pediatric patients 14 years of age and older (288 in the Noxafil group, 287 in voriconazole group (voriconazole for injection or voriconazole tablets)) with proven, probable or possible invasive aspergillosis were included. The median duration of treatment was 67 days for Noxafil injection or Noxafil delayed-release tablets and 64 days for voriconazole.

In this study, 55% to 60% of patients started intravenous treatment with Noxafil (Noxafil injection) or voriconazole (voriconazole for injection). The median duration of the first instance of intravenous treatment (before switching to oral treatment or discontinuing or completing study treatment) was 9 days for both groups. Table 7 presents adverse reactions reported at an incidence of ≥10% in either one of the treatment groups in the Aspergillosis Treatment Study. Adverse reactions leading to treatment discontinuation were reported for 34% of patients.

The most commonly reported adverse reactions (>2% of patients) leading to treatment discontinuation were septic shock, respiratory failure, and bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in the Noxafil group, and septic shock and acute myeloid leukemia in the voriconazole group. The most frequently reported adverse reactions in the Noxafil-treated group were pyrexia (28%), hypokalemia (28%), and nausea (23%). Table 7: Adverse Reactions in at least 10% of Adults and Adolescents Receiving Noxafil Injection or Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets for the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis Adverse Reactions Noxafil injection or Noxafil delayed-release tablets n=288 (%) Voriconazole for injection or Voriconazole tablets n=287 (%) Percentage of Patients Reporting any Adverse Reaction 97.6

Hypokalemia 28.5 17.1 Pyrexia 28.1 25.1 Nausea 22.6 17.8 Diarrhea 18.1 18.1

Vomiting 18.1

Alanine aminotransferase increased 14.6 12.9 Febrile neutropenia 14.6 13.2 Aspartate aminotransferase increased

13.2

Clinical Trial Experience with Noxafil Injection for Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and

Candida Infections Administration of multiple doses of Noxafil injection via a peripheral venous catheter were associated with thrombophlebitis (60% incidence). Therefore, in subsequent studies, Noxafil injection was administered via central venous catheter. The safety of Noxafil injection has been assessed in 268 patients in a clinical trial. Patients were enrolled in a non-comparative pharmacokinetic and safety trial of Noxafil injection when given as antifungal prophylaxis (Noxafil Injection Study). Patients were immunocompromised with underlying conditions including hematological malignancy, neutropenia post-chemotherapy, GVHD, and post HSCT. This patient population was 55% male, had a mean age of 51 years (range: 18-82 years, 19% of patients were ≥65 years of age), and were 95% White and 8% Hispanic.

In this study, 10 patients received a single dose of 200 mg Noxafil injection, 21 patients received 200 mg daily dosage for a median of 14 days, and 237 patients received 300 mg daily dosage for a median of 9 days (the 200 mg dosage is not a recommended dosage for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in adults. In the 300 mg daily dosage group each patient received a loading intravenous dose of Noxafil injection 300 mg twice on Day 1, then intravenous Noxafil injection therapy, and finally Noxafil oral suspension to complete 28 days of total Noxafil therapy. Table 8 presents adverse reactions observed in patients treated with the Noxafil injection 300 mg daily dosage group in the Noxafil Injection Study.

The most frequently reported adverse reactions with an onset during the intravenous Noxafil injection phase of dosing with 300 mg once daily were diarrhea (32%), hypokalemia (22%), pyrexia (21%), and nausea (19%). These adverse reactions were consistent with those seen in studies with Noxafil oral suspension. Table 8: Adverse Reactions in at least 10% of Adults Receiving Noxafil Injection for the Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections Adverse Reactions Noxafil Injection Treatment Phase n=237 Adverse reactions reported in patients with an onset during the Noxafil intravenous dosing phase of the study. (%) Noxafil Injection Treatment Phase or Subsequent Noxafil Oral Suspension Treatment Phase n=237 Adverse reactions reported with an onset at any time during the study in patients who were treated for up to 28 days of Noxafil therapy. (%) Percentage of Patients Reporting any Adverse Reaction 93 99 Diarrhea 32 39 Hypokalemia 22 28 Pyrexia 21 31 Nausea 19 30 Rash 15 24 Headache 14 21 Epistaxis 14 17 Abdominal Pain 13 17 Chills 12 16 Edema Peripheral 12 15 Vomiting 12 19 Hypomagnesemia 11 13 Decreased appetite 10 12 Cough 9 13 Constipation 8 13 Fatigue 8 10 Hypertension 8 11 Petechiae 8 10 Anemia 7 10 Dyspnea 7 10 Thrombocytopenia 7 11 Abdominal Pain Upper 6 11 Clinical Trial Experience with Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets for Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections The safety of Noxafil delayed-release tablets has been assessed in 230 patients in clinical trials. Patients were enrolled in a non-comparative pharmacokinetic and safety trial of Noxafil delayed-release tablets when given as antifungal prophylaxis (Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablet Study). Patients were immunocompromised with underlying conditions including hematological malignancy, neutropenia post-chemotherapy, GVHD, and post HSCT. This patient population was 62% male, had a mean age of 51 years (range: 19-78 years, 17% of patients were ≥65 years of age), and were 93% White and 16% Hispanic.

Noxafil delayed-release tablets were given for a median duration of 28 days. In this study, 20 adult patients received 200 mg daily dosage (this is not a recommended dosage ) and 210 adult patients received 300 mg daily dosage (following twice daily dosing on Day 1 in each cohort). Table 9 presents adverse reactions (incidence of ≥ 10%) observed in patients treated with the Noxafil delayed-release tablets 300 mg daily dosage in the Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablet Study. The most frequently reported adverse reactions (>25%) in patients treated with Noxafil delayed-release tablets 300 mg once daily were diarrhea, pyrexia, and nausea.

The most common adverse reaction leading to discontinuation of Noxafil delayed-release tablets 300 mg once daily was nausea (2%). Table 9: Adverse Reactions in at least 10% of Adults Receiving Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets (300 mg Daily Dosage) for the Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections Adverse Reactions Noxafil delayed-release tablet (300 mg) n=210 (%) Percentage of Patients Reporting any Adverse Reaction 99 Diarrhea 29 Pyrexia 28 Nausea 27 Hypokalemia 22 Cough 17 Edema Peripheral 16 Rash 16 Epistaxis 14 Headache 14 Mucosal Inflammation 14 Thrombocytopenia 14 Vomiting 13 Abdominal Pain 11 Hypertension 11 Anemia 10 Asthenia 10 Chills 10 Constipation 10 Hypomagnesemia 10 Clinical Trials Safety Experience with Noxafil Oral Suspension The safety of Noxafil oral suspension has been assessed in 1,844 patients, including: 605 patients in the active-controlled studies for the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections 557 patients in the active-controlled OPC studies (not refractory to itraconazole or fluconazole) 239 patients in refractory OPC studies (refractory to itraconazole or fluconazole) (rOPC), and 443 patients in other patient populations These studies included immunocompromised patients (e.g., patients with hematological malignancy, neutropenia post-chemotherapy, GVHD post HSCT, and HIV infection), as well as non-neutropenic patients. This patient population was 71% male, had a mean age of 42 years (range: 8-84 years, 6% of patients were ≥65 years of age and 1% was <18 years of age), and were 64% White, 14% Black, 16% Hispanic. Noxafil oral suspension therapy was given to 171 patients for ≥6 months, including 58 patients who received Noxafil oral suspension therapy for ≥12 months.

Table 10 presents adverse reactions observed at an incidence of >10% in the studies for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections. Table 11 presents adverse reactions observed at an incidence of at least 10% in the OPC/rOPC studies. Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections (Noxafil oral suspension) In the two randomized, comparative studies for prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in those at high risk of developing these infections due to being severely immunocompromised (Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1 and 2), the safety of Noxafil oral suspension 200 mg three times a day was compared to fluconazole 400 mg once daily or itraconazole 200 mg twice a day in severely immunocompromised patients.

The most frequently reported adverse reactions (>30%) in these trials were fever, diarrhea, and nausea. The most common adverse reactions leading to discontinuation of Noxafil oral suspension were GI adverse reactions, specifically, nausea (2%), vomiting (2%), and increased hepatic enzymes (2%). Table 10: Adverse Reactions in at least 10% of Patients Receiving Noxafil Oral Suspension for the Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections Adverse Reactions Noxafil Oral Suspension n=605 (%) Fluconazole n=539 (%) Itraconazole n=58 (%) Percentage of Patients Reporting any Adverse Reaction 98 99 100 Fever 45 47 55 Diarrhea 42 39 60 Nausea 38 37 52 Hypokalemia 30 26 52 Thrombocytopenia 29 27 34 Vomiting 29 32 41 Headache 28 26 40 Abdominal Pain 27 27 36 Anemia 25 23 28 Coughing 24 24 24 Neutropenia 23 23 40 Constipation 21 17 17 Dyspnea 20 22 26 Rigors 20 16 29 Rash 19 18 43 Hypertension 18 16 5 Hypomagnesemia 18 16 19 Fatigue 17 18 9 Insomnia 17 17 19 Musculoskeletal Pain 16 15 16 Anorexia 15 17 28 Edema Legs 15 12 19 Epistaxis 14 14 21 Hypotension 14 15 17 Pharyngitis 12 11 21 Tachycardia 12 14 5 Arthralgia 11 12 9 Dizziness 11 10 9 Hyperglycemia 11 14 3 Petechiae 11 10 16 Pruritus 11 12 19 Back Pain 10 12 7 Bilirubinemia 10 9 19 Dyspepsia 10 9 10 Vaginal Hemorrhage Percentages of sex-specific adverse reactions are based on the number of males/females. 10 9 12 Treatment of Nonrefractory OPC and Refractory OPC (Noxafil oral suspension) In two randomized comparative studies for the treatment of nonrefractory OPC, the safety of Noxafil oral suspension (less than or equal to 400 mg once daily) in 557 HIV-infected patients was compared to the safety of fluconazole (100 mg once daily) in 262 HIV-infected patients. An additional 239 HIV-infected patients with refractory OPC (rOPC) received Noxafil oral suspension in two non-comparative trials for rOPC. Of these patients, 149 received the 800 mg/day dosage and the remainder received the less than or equal to 400 mg once daily dosage.

In the nonrefractory OPC and rOPC studies, the most common adverse reactions in patients treated with Noxafil oral suspension were fever, diarrhea, nausea, headache, vomiting, and coughing. Adverse reactions were reported more frequently in the studies of patients with refractory OPC. Among these highly immunocompromised patients with advanced HIV disease, serious adverse reactions were reported in 55% (132/239) of Noxafil oral suspension-treated patients. The most commonly reported serious adverse reactions were fever (13%) and neutropenia (10%). Table 11: Adverse Reactions in at least 10% of Patients Receiving Noxafil Oral Suspension for the Treatment of Nonrefractory and Refractory OPC Adverse Reactions Controlled OPC Pool Refractory OPC Pool Noxafil Oral Suspension Fluconazole Noxafil Oral Suspension n=557 (%) n=262 (%) n=239 (%) OPC=oropharyngeal candidiasis Percentage of Patients that Reported any Adverse Reaction Based on patients reporting adverse reactions at least once during the study, without regard to relationship to treatment.

Patients may have reported more than 1 adverse reaction. 64 67 92 Diarrhea 10 13 29 Nausea 9 11 29 Headache 8 9 20 Vomiting 7 7 28 Fever 6 8 34 Abdominal Pain 5 6 18 Neutropenia 4 3 16 Coughing 3 4 25 Fatigue 3 5 13 Herpes Simplex 3 3 11 Pneumonia 3 2 10 Rash 3 4 15 Anemia 2 2 14 Anorexia 2 2 19 Asthenia 2 2 13 Sweating Increased 2 2 10 Candidiasis, Oral 1 <1 12 Dehydration 1 3 11 Dyspnea 1 3 12 Insomnia 1 1 16 Pain 1 1 11 Weight Decrease 1 <1 14 Rigors <1 2 12 Additional Adverse Reactions Reported in Less Than 5% of Noxafil-Treated Patients in Clinical Trials Other clinically significant adverse reactions reported in less than 5% of patients in clinical trials of Noxafil are listed below: Blood and lymphatic system disorders: hemolytic uremic syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, neutropenia aggravated Endocrine disorders: adrenal insufficiency Nervous system disorders: paresthesia Immune system disorders: allergic reaction Cardiac disorders: torsades de pointes Vascular disorders: pulmonary embolism Gastrointestinal disorders: pancreatitis Liver and Biliary System Disorders: hepatic enzymes increased, hepatic function abnormal, hepatitis, hepatomegaly, jaundice Renal & Urinary System Disorders: renal failure acute Liver Test Abnormalities in the Clinical Trials of Noxafil Oral Suspension Liver Test Abnormalities in the Clinical Trials with Noxafil Oral Suspension for Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections In the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections studies, the number and percentage of patients with changes in liver tests from Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) Grade 0, 1, or 2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 at the end of the studies is presented in Table 12. Table 12: Changes in Liver Test Results from CTC Grade 0, 1, or 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 in Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections Studies (Noxafil Oral Suspension Studies 1 and 2) Number (%) of Patients with Change Change from Grade 0 to 2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 during the study. These data are presented in the form X/Y, where X represents the number of patients who met the criterion as indicated, and Y represents the number of patients who had a baseline observation and at least one post-baseline observation. Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1 CTC = Common Toxicity Criteria; AST= Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT= Alanine Aminotransferase.

Laboratory Parameter Noxafil Oral Suspension n=301 Fluconazole n=299 AST 11/266 13/266 ALT 47/271 39/272 Bilirubin 24/271 20/275 Alkaline Phosphatase 9/271 8/271 Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 2 Laboratory Parameter Noxafil Oral Suspension (n=304) Fluconazole/Itraconazole (n=298) AST 9/286 5/280 ALT 18/289 13/284 Bilirubin 20/290 25/285 Alkaline Phosphatase 4/281 1/276 (<1) Liver Test Abnormalities in the Clinical Trials with Noxafil Oral Suspension for the Treatment of OPC The number and percentage of patients treated for OPC with clinically significant liver test abnormalities at any time during the studies is provided in Table 13 (liver test abnormalities were present in some of these patients prior to initiation of the study drug). Table 13: Clinically Significant Liver Test Abnormalities without Regard to Baseline Value (Noxafil Oral Suspension Studies for the Treatment of OPC) Laboratory Test Nonrefractory OPC Refractory OPC Noxafil Oral Suspension Fluconazole Noxafil Oral Suspension n=557 (%) n=262 (%) n=239 (%) ALT= Alanine Aminotransferase; AST= Aspartate Aminotransferase. ALT > 3.0 x ULN 16/537 13/254 25/226 AST > 3.0 x ULN 33/537 26/254 39/223 Total Bilirubin > 1.5 x ULN 15/536 5/254 9/197 Alkaline Phosphatase > 3.0 x ULN 17/535 15/253 24/190 Liver Test Abnormalities in the Clinical Trials with Noxafil Oral Suspension for the Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis The number and percentage of patients treated for invasive aspergillosis with clinically significant liver test abnormalities at any time during the Aspergillosis Treatment Study is provided in Table 14. Liver test abnormalities present prior to the initiation of study drug included: ALT (22% of the patients), AST (13% of the patients), and bilirubin (13% of the patients). Table 14: Changes in Liver Test Results from CTC Grade 0, 1, or 2 at Baseline to Grade 3 or 4 (Aspergillosis Treatment Study) Number (%) of Patients with Change Change from Grade 0 to 2 at baseline to Grade 3 or 4 during the study. These data are presented in the form n/N, where n represents the number of patients who met the criterion as indicated, and N represents the number of patients who had a baseline observation and at least one post-baseline observation.

Laboratory Parameter Noxafil n/N (%) Voriconazole n/N (%) N=Number of patients for a given laboratory test with a baseline value of CTC Grade 0, 1, or 2 and at least one post-baseline value. CTC = Common Toxicity Criteria; AST= Aspartate Aminotransferase; ALT= Alanine Aminotransferase. AST 22/281 21/285 ALT 29/281 23/282 Bilirubin 26/280 25/284 Alkaline Phosphatase 12/282 20/284 In healthy volunteers and patients, elevation of liver test values did not appear to be associated with higher plasma posaconazole concentrations.

Clinical Trials in Pediatric Patients 2 Years of Age and Older The safety of Noxafil injection and Noxafil PowderMix (for delayed-release oral suspension) for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections was evaluated in an open-label uncontrolled dose-ranging pharmacokinetic and safety study of Noxafil injection and Noxafil PowderMix (Pediatric Study 1, NCT02452034). In this study, 115 immunocompromised pediatric patients 2 to less than 18 years of age with known or expected neutropenia initially received Noxafil injection (up to 6 mg/kg twice daily for the first day and then up to 6 mg/kg for at least 7 days), and then 63 patients were transitioned to Noxafil PowderMix (up to 6 mg/kg once daily). The mean overall treatment duration was 21 days including a mean duration of 14 days (range: 1 to 28 days) on Noxafil injection and a mean duration of 12 days (range: 2 to 18 days) on Noxafil PowderMix. In this study, the reported adverse reaction profile of Noxafil injection and Noxafil PowderMix in pediatric patients was consistent with the safety profile of Noxafil in adults. The most common adverse reactions that occurred in greater than 20% of pediatric patients who received Noxafil injection and Noxafil PowderMix were pyrexia, febrile neutropenia, vomiting, mucosal inflammation, pruritus, hypertension, hypokalemia, and stomatitis.

The safety of Noxafil injection, Noxafil delayed-release tablets, and Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis was evaluated in an open-label, non-comparative clinical study in 31 pediatric patients 2 to less than 18 years of age with a diagnosis of possible, probable, or proven invasive aspergillosis (Pediatric Study 2, NCT04218851). In this study, all 31 pediatric patients initially received Noxafil injection (6 mg/kg twice daily on the first day and then 6 mg/kg once daily) for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis; 12 patients were transitioned to Noxafil delayed-release tablets (300 mg once daily) if they weighed ≥40 kg, and 10 patients were transitioned to Noxafil PowderMix (based on weight) if they weighed 10 to 40 kg . The mean overall treatment duration was 50 days including 15 days (range: 2 to 78 days) on Noxafil injection, 54 days (range: 6 to 80 days) on Noxafil delayed-release tablets, and 44 days (range: 7 to 76 days) on Noxafil PowderMix. The reported adverse reaction profile of Noxafil injection, Noxafil delayed-release tablets, and Noxafil PowderMix in pediatric patients was consistent with the known safety profile of Noxafil in adults. The most common adverse reactions that occurred in greater than 20% of pediatric patients who received any of the three formulations of Noxafil were vomiting, pyrexia, abdominal pain, liver test abnormalities, and hypertension.

Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reaction has been identified during the post-approval use of Noxafil. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Endocrine Disorders: Pseudoaldosteronism

Warnings & Cautions for Noxafil

Calcineurin-Inhibitor Toxicity

Concomitant administration of Noxafil with cyclosporine or tacrolimus increases the whole blood trough concentrations of these calcineurin-inhibitors . Nephrotoxicity and leukoencephalopathy (including deaths) have been reported in clinical efficacy studies in patients with elevated cyclosporine or tacrolimus concentrations. Frequent monitoring of tacrolimus or cyclosporine whole blood trough concentrations should be performed during and at discontinuation of Noxafil treatment and the tacrolimus or cyclosporine dose adjusted accordingly.

Arrhythmias and QT Prolongation Some azoles, including Noxafil, have been associated with

prolongation of the QT interval on the electrocardiogram. In addition, cases of torsades de pointes have been reported in patients taking Noxafil. Results from a multiple time-matched ECG analysis in healthy volunteers did not show any increase in the mean of the QTc interval.

Multiple, time-matched ECGs collected over a 12-hour period were recorded at baseline and steady-state from 173 healthy male and female volunteers (18-85 years of age) administered Noxafil oral suspension 400 mg twice daily with a high-fat meal. In this pooled analysis, the mean QTc (Fridericia) interval change from baseline was –5 msec following administration of the recommended clinical dose. A decrease in the QTc(F) interval (–3 msec) was also observed in a small number of subjects (n=16) administered placebo.

The placebo-adjusted mean maximum QTc(F) interval change from baseline was <0 msec (–8 msec). No healthy subject administered Noxafil had a QTc(F) interval ≥500 msec or an increase ≥60 msec in their QTc(F) interval from baseline. Noxafil should be administered with caution to patients with potentially proarrhythmic conditions. Do not administer with drugs that are known to prolong the QTc interval and are metabolized through CYP3A4 .

Electrolyte Disturbances Electrolyte disturbances, especially those involving potassium, magnesium or calcium levels

should be monitored and corrected as necessary before and during Noxafil therapy.

Pseudoaldosteronism Pseudoaldosteronism, manifested by the onset of hypertension or worsening of hypertension

and abnormal laboratory findings (hypokalemia, low serum renin and aldosterone, and elevated 11-deoxycortisol), has been reported with posaconazole use in the postmarket setting. Monitor blood pressure and potassium levels and manage as necessary. Management of pseudoaldosteronism may include discontinuation of Noxafil, substitution with an appropriate antifungal drug that is not associated with pseudoaldosteronism, or use of aldosterone receptor antagonists.

Hepatic Toxicity Hepatic reactions (e.g., mild to moderate elevations in alanine aminotransferase

(ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, and/or clinical hepatitis) have been reported in clinical trials. The elevations in liver tests were generally reversible on discontinuation of therapy, and in some instances these tests normalized without drug interruption. Cases of more severe hepatic reactions including cholestasis or hepatic failure including deaths have been reported in patients with serious underlying medical conditions (e.g., hematologic malignancy) during treatment with Noxafil.

These severe hepatic reactions were seen primarily in subjects receiving the Noxafil oral suspension 800 mg daily (400 mg twice daily or 200 mg four times a day) in clinical trials. Liver tests should be evaluated at the start of and during the course of Noxafil therapy. Patients who develop abnormal liver tests during Noxafil therapy should be monitored for the development of more severe hepatic injury.

Patient management should include laboratory evaluation of hepatic function (particularly liver tests and bilirubin). Discontinuation of Noxafil must be considered if clinical signs and symptoms consistent with liver disease develop that may be attributable to Noxafil.

Renal Impairment Due to the variability in exposure with Noxafil delayed-release tablets

Noxafil oral suspension, and Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension, patients with severe renal impairment should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections. Noxafil injection should be avoided in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment (eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), unless an assessment of the benefit/risk to the patient justifies the use of Noxafil injection. In patients with moderate or severe renal impairment (eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ), receiving the Noxafil injection, accumulation of the intravenous vehicle, SBECD, is expected to occur.

Serum creatinine levels should be closely monitored in these patients, and, if increases occur, consideration should be given to changing to oral Noxafil therapy .

Midazolam Toxicity

Concomitant administration of Noxafil with midazolam increases the midazolam plasma concentrations by approximately 5-fold. Increased plasma midazolam concentrations could potentiate and prolong hypnotic and sedative effects. Patients must be monitored closely for adverse effects associated with high plasma concentrations of midazolam and benzodiazepine receptor antagonists must be available to reverse these effects .

Vincristine Toxicity

Concomitant administration of azole antifungals, including Noxafil, with vincristine has been associated with neurotoxicity and other serious adverse reactions, including seizures, peripheral neuropathy, syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion, and paralytic ileus. Reserve azole antifungals, including Noxafil, for patients receiving a vinca alkaloid, including vincristine, who have no alternative antifungal treatment options .

Risk in Patients with Hereditary Fructose Intolerance (HFI) Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release

oral suspension contains sorbitol, an inactive ingredient, and may precipitate a metabolic crisis that may include, but is not limited to life-threatening hypoglycemia, hypophosphatemia, lactic acidosis, and hepatic failure in patients with HFI. Obtain careful history of HFI symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain) with sorbitol/fructose/sucrose exposure prior to Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension administration because a diagnosis of HFI may not yet be established in pediatric patients . 5.10 Breakthrough Fungal Infections Patients who have severe diarrhea or vomiting should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections when receiving Noxafil delayed-release tablets, Noxafil oral suspension, or Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension. 5.11 Venetoclax Toxicity Concomitant administration of Noxafil, a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, with venetoclax may increase venetoclax toxicities, including the risk of tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), neutropenia, and serious infections. In patients with CLL/SLL, administration of Noxafil during initiation and the ramp-up phase of venetoclax is contraindicated . Refer to the venetoclax labeling for safety monitoring and dose reduction in the steady daily dosing phase in CLL/SLL patients. For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), dose reduction and safety monitoring are recommended across all dosing phases when coadministering Noxafil with venetoclax.

Refer to the venetoclax prescribing information for dosing instructions.

Drug Interactions with Noxafil

  • Table 15 and Table 17 include drugs with clinically important drug interactions when administered concomitantly with Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix and instructions for preventing or managing them. Table 16 includes important drug interactions specific to the absorption of posaconazole administered as either Noxafil oral suspension or Noxafil PowderMix. These recommendations are based on either drug interaction studies or predicted interactions due to the expected magnitude of interaction and potential for serious adverse reactions or loss of efficacy [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . The following information was derived from data with Noxafil oral suspension or another posaconazole tablet formulation unless otherwise noted. All clinically important drug interactions with Noxafil oral suspension, except for those that affect the absorption of posaconazole (via gastric pH and motility), are considered relevant to clinically important drug interactions with Noxafil injection, Noxafil delayed-release tablets, and Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . Consult the labeling of concomitantly used drugs to obtain further information about interactions with posaconazole. Interaction Drug Interaction Rifabutin, phenytoin, efavirenz, cimetidine, esomeprazole The drug interactions with esomeprazole and metoclopramide do not apply to Noxafil tablets or Noxafil PowderMix ( 7.3 , 12.3 ). Avoid coadministration unless the benefit outweighs the risks ( 7.1 , 7.2 ) Other drugs metabolized by CYP3A4 Consider dosage adjustment and monitor for adverse effects and toxicity ( 7.2 ) Digoxin Monitor digoxin plasma concentrations ( 7.2 ) Fosamprenavir, metoclopramide Monitor for breakthrough fungal infections ( 7.1 ) 7.1 Effects of Other Drugs on Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix Posaconazole is primarily metabolized via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase and is a substrate of p-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux. Therefore, inhibitors or inducers of these clearance pathways may affect posaconazole plasma concentrations. Concomitant use of Noxafil with drugs that can decrease the plasma posaconazole concentrations should generally be avoided unless the benefit outweighs the risk. If such drugs are necessary, patients should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections. Table 15: Drug Interactions Affecting Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix When Administered Concomitantly with Other Drugs UDP-Glucuronidase Inducers Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Posaconazole is a UDP-glucuronosyltransferase substrate. Concomitant use of Noxafil with UDP-glucuronidase inducers may decrease posaconazole exposure [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ], which may reduce the effectiveness of posaconazole. Prevention or Management Efavirenz Avoid concomitant use of posaconazole with efavirenz, unless the benefit outweighs the risks. Rifabutin Avoid concomitant use of posaconazole with rifabutin unless the benefit to the patient outweighs the risk. If concomitant use is needed, monitor closely for breakthrough fungal infections. See Table 17 for rifabutin monitoring considerations when posaconazole affects rifabutin via CYP3A4 inhibition. Phenytoin Avoid concomitant use of posaconazole with phenytoin unless the benefit to the patient outweighs the risk. If concomitant use is needed, monitor for breakthrough fungal infections. See Table 17 for phenytoin monitoring considerations when posaconazole affects phenytoin via CYP3A4 inhibition. Fosamprenavir Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Concomitant use of Noxafil with fosamprenavir may lead to decreased posaconazole plasma concentrations [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ], which may reduce effectiveness of posaconazole. Prevention or Management If concomitant use of posaconazole with fosamprenavir is needed, monitor closely for breakthrough fungal infections. Table 16: Drug Interactions Affecting Noxafil Oral Suspension and Noxafil PowderMix Absorption When Administered Concomitantly with Other Drugs Noxafil Oral Suspension Cimetidine and Esomeprazole Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Concomitant use of Noxafil oral suspension with cimetidine or esomeprazole resulted in decreased posaconazole plasma concentrations [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ], which may reduce effectiveness of Noxafil. Prevention or Management Avoid concomitant use of Noxafil oral suspension with cimetidine or esomeprazole unless the benefit outweighs the risks. If concomitant use is needed, monitor closely for breakthrough fungal infections. Metoclopramide Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Concomitant use of Noxafil oral suspension with metoclopramide decreased posaconazole plasma concentrations [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ], which may reduce effectiveness of Noxafil oral suspension. Prevention or Management If Noxafil oral suspension is concomitantly administered with metoclopramide, closely monitor for breakthrough fungal infections. Noxafil Oral PowderMix Alcohol Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Posaconazole releases faster from Noxafil PowderMix in the presence of alcohol, which may interfere with Noxafil PowderMix’s delayed-release characteristics [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Prevention or Management Administration of Noxafil PowderMix with alcohol is not recommended. 7.2 Effects of Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix on Other Drugs Posaconazole is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Therefore, concomitant use of Noxafil may increase plasma concentrations of drugs that are CYP3A4 substrates [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . Table 17: Drug Interactions Affecting Drugs Administered Concomitantly with Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix Digoxin Clinical Effect(s) Increased digoxin plasma concentrations have been reported in patients who received concomitant posaconazole and digoxin. Prevention or Management Monitor digoxin plasma concentrations during concomitant use of posaconazole. Glipizide Clinical Effect(s) No dosage modification of glipizide is needed when used concomitantly with Noxafil. However, glucose concentrations decrease in some patients concomitantly administered posaconazole and glipizide. Prevention or Management Increase monitoring of glucose concentrations when used concomitantly. CYP3A Substrates Immunosuppressants that are CYP3A4 Substrates Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Posaconazole is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Therefore, plasma concentrations of CYP3A4 substrates may be increased by posaconazole use [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Prevention or Management Sirolimus Posaconazole is contraindicated with sirolimus [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . Tacrolimus
  • At initiation of posaconazole treatment, reduce the tacrolimus dosage to approximately one-third of the original tacrolimus dosage.
  • Frequent monitoring of tacrolimus whole blood trough concentrations should be performed during and at discontinuation of posaconazole treatment and the tacrolimus dosage should be modified accordingly [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . Cyclosporine
  • At initiation of posaconazole treatment reduce the cyclosporine dosage to approximately three-fourths of the original dosage.
  • Frequent monitoring of cyclosporine whole blood trough concentrations should be performed during and at discontinuation of posaconazole treatment and the cyclosporine dosage should be modified accordingly [see Warnings and Precautions (5.1) and Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . CYP3A4 Substrates that Prolong QTc Interval Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Concomitant use of posaconazole with CYP3A4 substrates such as pimozide and quinidine may result in increased plasma concentrations of the CYP3A4 substrates leading to QTc interval prolongation and torsades de pointes [see Warnings and Precautions (5.2) ]. Prevention or Management Pimozide Concomitant use with posaconazole is contraindicated. Quinidine HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins) that are CYP3A4 Substrates Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Concomitant use of posaconazole with simvastatin increased simvastatin plasma concentrations which can lead to rhabdomyolysis [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Prevention or Management Atorvastatin, Lovastatin, Simvastatin Concomitant use with posaconazole is contraindicated. Benzodiazepines that are CYP3A4 Substrates Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Concomitant use of posaconazole with midazolam increased midazolam plasma concentrations which could potentiate and prolong hypnotic and sedative effects [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . Prevention or Management Midazolam, Alprazolam, Triazolam Closely monitor for adverse reactions associated with high plasma concentrations of benzodiazepines that are CYP3A4 substrates during concomitant use, and a benzodiazepine receptor antagonist should be available to reverse effects [see Warnings and Precautions (5.7) ]. Calcium Channel Blockers that are CYP3A4 Substrates Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Posaconazole may increase the plasma concentrations of calcium channel blockers that are substrates of CYP3A4. Prevention or Management Verapamil, Diltiazem, Nifedipine, Nicardipine, Felodipine Monitor frequently for adverse reactions and toxicity with concomitant use of posaconazole with calcium channel blockers that are CYP3A4 substrates. Dosage reduction of the calcium channel blocker may be needed. Anti-HIV Drugs that are CYP3A4 Substrates Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Ritonavir and atazanavir are CYP3A4 substrates and posaconazole increased plasma concentrations of these drugs [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Prevention or Management Ritonavir and Atazanavir Monitor frequently for adverse reactions and toxicity of ritonavir and atazanavir during concomitant use. Antineoplastic Drugs that are CYP3A4 Substrates Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Posaconazole may increase plasma concentrations of oncology drugs that are CYP3A4 substrates, which may increase the risk of serious adverse reactions. Prevention or Management Venetoclax CLL/SLL patients : Concomitant use of posaconazole with venetoclax during initiation and ramp-up phase is contraindicated. AML patients : With concomitant use, venetoclax dosage reduction and safety monitoring is recommended across all dosing phases [see Warnings and Precautions (5.11) ] . Vinca alkaloids (e.g., vincristine, vinblastine) Reserve concomitant use for patients with no alternative antifungal treatment options [see Warnings and Precautions (5.8) ]. Ergot Alkaloids Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Most of the ergot alkaloids are CYP3A4 substrates. Posaconazole may increase the plasma concentrations of ergot alkaloids (ergotamine and dihydroergotamine) which may lead to ergotism. Prevention or Management Ergotamine, Dihydroergotamine Concomitant use with posaconazole is contraindicated. Phenytoin Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Phenytoin is a CYP3A4 substrate. Concomitant use of posaconazole with phenytoin increased phenytoin plasma concentrations [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Prevention or Management Avoid concomitant use of posaconazole with phenytoin unless the benefit outweighs the risk. frequently monitor phenytoin concentrations and consider a dosage reduction of phenytoin. See Table 15 for additional monitoring considerations when phenytoin affects posaconazole via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase inhibition. Rifabutin Mechanism and Clinical Effect(s) Rifabutin is a CYP3A4 substrate. Concomitant use of posaconazole with rifabutin increased rifabutin plasma concentrations [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ]. Prevention or Management Avoid concomitant use of posaconazole with rifabutin unless the benefit outweighs the risk. Frequent monitoring of full blood counts and adverse reactions due to increased rifabutin plasma concentrations (e.g., uveitis, leukopenia) during concomitant use are recommended. See Table 15 for additional monitoring considerations when rifabutin affects posaconazole via UDP-glucuronosyltransferase inhibition. 7.3 Absence of Clinically Important Interaction with Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix Additional clinical studies demonstrated that no clinically important effects on zidovudine, lamivudine, indinavir, or caffeine were observed when administered with Noxafil 200 mg once daily; therefore, no dose adjustments are required for these drugs when coadministered with Noxafil 200 mg once daily. No clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of Noxafil delayed-release tablets were observed during concomitant use with antacids, H 2 -receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors, and metoclopramide [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . No dosage adjustment of Noxafil delayed-release tablets or Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension is required during concomitant use with these drugs. No clinically relevant effects on the pharmacokinetics of Noxafil oral suspension were observed during concomitant use with antacids, H 2 -receptor antagonists (other than cimetidine), and loperamide [see Clinical Pharmacology (12.3) ] . No dosage adjustment of Noxafil oral suspension is required during concomitant use with these drugs (other than cimetidine).

Pregnancy Safety for Noxafil

Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on findings from animal data, Noxafil may cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant women. Available data for use of Noxafil in pregnant women are insufficient to establish a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. In animal reproduction studies, skeletal malformations were observed when posaconazole was dosed orally to pregnant rats during organogenesis at doses ≥1.4 times the 400 mg twice daily oral suspension regimen based on steady-state plasma concentrations of Noxafil in healthy volunteers.

In pregnant rabbits dosed orally during organogenesis, doses of ≥ 3 times the clinical exposure caused an increase in resorptions (see Data ). Based on animal data, advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes.

In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 to 4% and 15 to 20%, respectively. Data Animal Data : Posaconazole resulted in maternal toxicity (reduced food consumption and reduced body weight gain) and skeletal malformations (cranial malformations and missing ribs) when given orally to pregnant rats during organogenesis (Gestational Days 6 through 15) at doses ≥27 mg/kg (≥1.4 times the 400 mg twice daily oral suspension regimen based on steady-state plasma concentrations of drug in healthy volunteers). The no-effect dose for malformations and maternal toxicity in rats was 9 mg/kg, which is 0.7 times the exposure achieved with the 400 mg twice daily oral suspension regimen. No malformations were seen in rabbits dosed during organogenesis (Gestational Days 7 through 19) at doses up to 80 mg/kg (5 times the exposure achieved with the 400 mg twice daily oral suspension regimen). In the rabbit, the no-effect dose was 20 mg/kg, while high doses of 40 mg/kg and 80 mg/kg (3 or 5 times the clinical exposure) caused an increase in resorptions.

In rabbits dosed at 80 mg/kg, a reduction in body weight gain of females and a reduction in litter size were seen.

Pediatric Use of Noxafil

Pediatric Use The three Noxafil dosage forms (injection, delayed-release tablets, oral suspension) and one Noxafil PowderMix (for delayed-release oral suspension) dosage form are different products; are approved for different pediatric indications, age groups, and weights; have different dosing regimens; and have different preparation and administration instructions. Therefore, select the recommended dosage form based on the pediatric indication, age group, and weight. Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension is contraindicated in patients with HFI. Because a diagnosis of HFI may not yet be established in pediatric patients, obtain a careful history of HFI symptoms with sorbitol/fructose/sucrose exposure prior to administration of Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension.

Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil (injection and delayed-release tablets) have been established for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older. The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil PowderMix have been established for the treatment of invasive aspergillosis in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh 10 kg to 40 kg. Use of Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix for these pediatric indications is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled studies of Noxafil in adults and safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) data from two pediatric studies . The safety of Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix in pediatric patients for these pediatric indications was consistent with the known safety profile of Noxafil in adults.

Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension is not recommended for use in patients who weigh greater than 40 kg because the recommended dosage cannot be achieved with this dosage form. The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix have not been established in pediatric patients less than 2 years of age. Prophylaxis of Invasive Aspergillus and Candida Infections The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil (injection and delayed-release tablets) have been established for the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who are at high risk of developing these infections due to being severely immunocompromised.

The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil oral suspension have been established for the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in pediatric patients 13 years of age and older who are at high risk of developing these infections due to being severely immunocompromised. The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil PowderMix have been established for the prophylaxis of invasive Aspergillus and Candida infections in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older who weigh 10 kg to 40 kg who are at high risk of developing these infections due to being severely immunocompromised. Use of Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix for these pediatric indications is supported by adequate and well controlled studies of Noxafil in adults and pediatric patients aged 13 years of age and older and additional PK and safety data in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older.

Noxafil PowderMix is not recommended for use in patients who weigh greater than 40 kg because the recommended dosage cannot be achieved with this dosage form. The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil and Noxafil PowderMix have not been established in pediatric patients less than 2 years of age. Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis, including Refractory to Itraconazole and/or Fluconazole The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil oral suspension have been established for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC), including OPC refractory (rOPC) to itraconazole and/or fluconazole in pediatric patients 13 years of age and older.

Use of Noxafil oral suspension for this pediatric indication is supported by adequate and well controlled studies in adults and pediatric patients 13 years of age and older. The Noxafil injection, Noxafil delayed-release tablets, and Noxafil PowderMix products are not approved for the treatment of oropharyngeal candidiasis in pediatric patients. Noxafil Oral Suspension is the only dosage form approved for the treatment of OPC and rOPC in pediatric patients.

The safety and effectiveness of Noxafil oral suspension for the treatment of OPC and rOPC have not been established in pediatric patients less than 13 years of age.

Contraindications for Noxafil

Hypersensitivity Noxafil is contraindicated in persons with known hypersensitivity to posaconazole or

other azole antifungal agents.

Use with Sirolimus Noxafil is contraindicated with sirolimus.

Concomitant administration of Noxafil with sirolimus increases the sirolimus blood concentrations by approximately 9-fold and can result in sirolimus toxicity .

QT Prolongation with

Concomitant Use with CYP3A4 Substrates Noxafil is contraindicated with CYP3A4 substrates that prolong the QT interval. Concomitant administration of Noxafil with the CYP3A4 substrates, pimozide and quinidine may result in increased plasma concentrations of these drugs, leading to QTc prolongation and cases of torsades de pointes .

HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Primarily Metabolized Through

CYP3A4 Coadministration with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors that are primarily metabolized through CYP3A4 (e.g., atorvastatin, lovastatin, and simvastatin) is contraindicated since increased plasma concentration of these drugs can lead to rhabdomyolysis .

Use with Ergot Alkaloids Noxafil may increase the plasma concentrations of ergot

alkaloids (ergotamine and dihydroergotamine) which may lead to ergotism.

Use with Venetoclax Coadministration of Noxafil with venetoclax at initiation and during

the ramp-up phase is contraindicated in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) due to the potential for increased risk of tumor lysis syndrome.

Use of Noxafil PowderMix for Delayed-Release Oral Suspension in Patients with Hereditary

Fructose Intolerance Noxafil PowderMix for delayed-release oral suspension is contraindicated in patients with known or suspected hereditary fructose intolerance (HFI) .

Overdosage Information for Noxafil

There is no experience with overdosage of Noxafil injection and Noxafil delayed-release tablets. During the clinical trials, some patients received Noxafil oral suspension up to 1,600 mg/day with no adverse reactions noted that were different from the lower doses. In addition, accidental overdose was noted in one patient who took 1200 mg twice daily Noxafil oral suspension for 3 days.

No related adverse reactions were noted by the investigator. Posaconazole is not removed by hemodialysis.

Clinical Studies of Noxafil

Treatment of Invasive Aspergillosis with Noxafil Injection and Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets Aspergillosis

Treatment Study (NCT01782131) was a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial which evaluated the safety and efficacy of Noxafil injection and Noxafil delayed-release tablets versus voriconazole for primary treatment of invasive fungal disease caused by Aspergillus species. Eligible patients had proven, probable, or possible invasive fungal infections per the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group, EORTC/MSG criteria. Patients were stratified by risk for mortality or poor outcome where high risk included a history of allogeneic bone marrow transplant, liver transplant, or relapsed leukemia undergoing salvage chemotherapy.

The median age of patients was 57 years (range: 14-91 years), with 27.8% of patients aged ≥65 years; 5 patients were pediatric patients 14-16 years of age, of whom 3 were treated with Noxafil and 2 with voriconazole. The majority of patients were male (59.8%) and white (67.1%). With regard to risk factors for invasive aspergillosis, approximately two-thirds of the patients in the study had a recent history of neutropenia, while approximately 20% with a history of an allogeneic stem cell transplant. Over 80% of subjects in each treatment group had infection limited to the lower respiratory tract (primarily lung), while approximately 11% to 13% also had infection in another organ.

Invasive aspergillosis was proven or probable in 58.1% of patients as classified by independent adjudicators blinded to study treatment assignment. At least one Aspergillus species was identified in 21% of the patients; A. fumigatus and A. flavus were the most common pathogens identified. Patients randomized to receive Noxafil were given a dose of 300 mg once daily (twice daily on Day 1) IV or tablet.

Patients randomized to receive voriconazole were given a dose of 6 mg/kg twice daily Day 1 followed by 4 mg/kg twice daily IV, or oral 300 mg twice daily Day 1 followed by 200 mg twice daily. The recommended initial route of administration was IV; however, patients could begin oral therapy if clinically stable and able to tolerate oral dosing. The transition from IV to oral therapy occurred when the patient was clinically stable.

The protocol recommended duration of therapy was 84 days with a maximum allowed duration of 98 days. Median treatment duration was 67 days for Noxafil patients and 64 days for voriconazole patients. Overall, 55% to 60% of patients began treatment with the IV formulation with a median duration of 9 days for the initial IV dosing.

The Intent to Treat (ITT) population included all patients randomized and receiving at least one dose of study treatment. All-cause mortality through Day 42 in the overall population (ITT) was 15.3% for Noxafil patients compared to 20.6% for voriconazole patients for an adjusted treatment difference of -5.3% with a 95% confidence interval of -11.6 to 1.0%. Consistent results were seen in patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis per EORTC criteria (see Table 32 ). Table 32: Noxafil Injection and Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets Invasive Aspergillosis Treatment Study: All-Cause Mortality Through Day 42 Noxafil Injection and Delayed-Release Tablets Voriconazole Population N n (%) N n (%) Difference Adjusted treatment difference based on Miettinen and Nurminen’s method stratified by randomization factor (risk for mortality/poor outcome), using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting scheme. (95% CI) Intent to Treat 288 44 287 59 -5.3 (-11.6, 1.0) Proven/Probable Invasive Aspergillosis 163 31 171 32 0.3 (-8.2, 8.8) Global clinical response at Week 6 was assessed by a blinded, independent adjudication committee based upon prespecified clinical, radiologic, and mycologic criteria. In the subgroup of patients with proven or probable invasive aspergillosis per EORTC criteria, the global clinical response of success (complete or partial response) at Week 6 was seen in 44.8% for Noxafil-treated patients compared to 45.6% for voriconazole-treated patients (see Table 33 ). Table 33: Noxafil Injection and Noxafil Delayed-Release Tablets Invasive Aspergillosis Treatment Study: Successful Global Clinical Response Successful Global Clinical Response was defined as survival with a partial or complete response. at Week 6 Posaconazole Voriconazole Population N Success N Success Difference Adjusted treatment difference based on Miettinen and Nurminen’s method stratified by randomization factor (risk for mortality/poor outcome), using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel weighting scheme. (95% CI) Proven/Probable Invasive Aspergillosis 163 73 171 78 -0.6 (-11.2, 10.1)

Prophylaxis of Aspergillus and Candida Infections with Noxafil Oral Suspension Two randomized

controlled studies were conducted using Noxafil as prophylaxis for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among patients at high risk due to severely compromised immune systems. The first study (Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1) was a randomized, double-blind trial that compared Noxafil oral suspension (200 mg three times a day) with fluconazole capsules (400 mg once daily) as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD). Efficacy of prophylaxis was evaluated using a composite endpoint of proven/probable IFIs, death, or treatment with systemic antifungal therapy (patients may have met more than one of these criteria). This assessed all patients while on study therapy plus 7 days and at 16 weeks post-randomization. The mean duration of therapy was comparable between the 2 treatment groups (80 days, Noxafil oral suspension; 77 days, fluconazole). Table 34 contains the results from Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1. Table 34: Results from Blinded Clinical Study in Prophylaxis of IFI in All Randomized Patients with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) and Graft-vs.-Host Disease (GVHD): Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1 Posaconazole n=301 Fluconazole n=299 On therapy plus 7 days Clinical Failure Patients may have met more than one criterion defining failure. 50 (17%) 55 (18%) Failure due to: Proven/Probable IFI 7 (2%) 22 (7%) ( Aspergillus ) 3 (1%) 17 (6%) ( Candida ) 1 (<1%) 3 (1%) (Other) 3 (1%) 2 (1%) All Deaths 22 (7%) 24 (8%) Proven/probable fungal infection prior to death 2 (<1%) 6 (2%) SAF Use of systemic antifungal therapy (SAF) criterion is based on protocol definitions (empiric/IFI usage >4 consecutive days). 27 (9%) 25 (8%) Through 16 weeks Clinical Failure, 95% confidence interval (posaconazole-fluconazole) = (-11.5%, + 3.7%). 99 (33%) 110 (37%) Failure due to: Proven/Probable IFI 16 (5%) 27 (9%) ( Aspergillus ) 7 (2%) 21 (7%) ( Candida ) 4 (1%) 4 (1%) (Other) 5 (2%) 2 (1%) All Deaths 58 (19%) 59 (20%) Proven/probable fungal infection prior to death 10 (3%) 16 (5%) SAF 26 (9%) 30 (10%) Event free lost to follow-up Patients who are lost to follow-up (not observed for 112 days), and who did not meet another clinical failure endpoint.

These patients were considered failures. 24 (8%) 30 (10%) The second study (Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 2) was a randomized, open-label study that compared Noxafil oral suspension (200 mg 3 times a day) with fluconazole suspension (400 mg once daily) or itraconazole oral solution (200 mg twice a day) as prophylaxis against IFIs in neutropenic patients who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy for AML or MDS. As in Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1, efficacy of prophylaxis was evaluated using a composite endpoint of proven/probable IFIs, death, or treatment with systemic antifungal therapy (Patients might have met more than one of these criteria). This study assessed patients while on treatment plus 7 days and 100 days post-randomization. The mean duration of therapy was comparable between the 2 treatment groups (29 days, posaconazole; 25 days, fluconazole or itraconazole). Table 35 contains the results from Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 2. Table 35: Results from Open-Label Clinical Study 2 in Prophylaxis of IFI in All Randomized Patients with Hematologic Malignancy and Prolonged Neutropenia: Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 2 Posaconazole n=304 Fluconazole/Itraconazole n=298 On therapy plus 7 days Clinical Failure 95% confidence interval (posaconazole-fluconazole/itraconazole) = (-22.9%, -7.8%)., Patients may have met more than one criterion defining failure. 82 (27%) 126 (42%) Failure due to: Proven/Probable IFI 7 (2%) 25 (8%) ( Aspergillus ) 2 (1%) 20 (7%) ( Candida ) 3 (1%) 2 (1%) (Other) 2 (1%) 3 (1%) All Deaths 17 (6%) 25 (8%) Proven/probable fungal infection prior to death 1 (<1%) 2 (1%) SAF Use of systemic antifungal therapy (SAF) criterion is based on protocol definitions (empiric/IFI usage >3 consecutive days). 67 (22%) 98 (33%) Through 100 days post-randomization Clinical Failure 158 (52%) 191 (64%) Failure due to: Proven/Probable IFI 14 (5%) 33 (11%) ( Aspergillus ) 2 (1%) 26 (9%) ( Candida ) 10 (3%) 4 (1%) (Other) 2 (1%) 3 (1%) All Deaths 44 (14%) 64 (21%) Proven/probable fungal infection prior to death 2 (1%) 16 (5%) SAF 98 (32%) 125 (42%) Event free lost to follow-up Patients who are lost to follow-up (not observed for 100 days), and who did not meet another clinical failure endpoint. These patients were considered failures. 34 (11%) 24 (8%) In summary, 2 clinical studies of prophylaxis were conducted with the Noxafil oral suspension.

As seen in the accompanying tables (Table 34 and Table 35), clinical failure represented a composite endpoint of breakthrough IFI, mortality and use of systemic antifungal therapy. In Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1 (Table 34), the clinical failure rate of posaconazole (33%) was similar to fluconazole (37%), (95% CI for the difference posaconazole–comparator -11.5% to 3.7%) while in Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 2 (Table 35) clinical failure was lower for patients treated with posaconazole (27%) when compared to patients treated with fluconazole or itraconazole (42%), (95% CI for the difference posaconazole–comparator -22.9% to -7.8%). All-cause mortality was similar at 16 weeks for both treatment arms in Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 1 ; all-cause mortality was lower at 100 days for Noxafil-treated patients in Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 2. Both studies demonstrated fewer breakthrough infections caused by Aspergillus species in patients receiving Noxafil prophylaxis when compared to patients receiving fluconazole or itraconazole.

Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis with Noxafil Oral Suspension Noxafil Oral Suspension Study

3 was a randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded study in HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Patients were treated with Noxafil or fluconazole oral suspension (both Noxafil and fluconazole were given as follows: 100 mg twice a day for 1 day followed by 100 mg once a day for 13 days). Clinical and mycological outcomes were assessed after 14 days of treatment and at 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had a positive oral swish culture of Candida species at baseline were included in the analyses (see Table 36 ). The majority of the subjects had C. albicans as the baseline pathogen.

Clinical success at Day 14 (complete or partial resolution of all ulcers and/or plaques and symptoms) and clinical relapse rates (recurrence of signs or symptoms after initial cure or improvement) 4 weeks after the end of treatment were similar between the treatment arms (see Table 36 ). Mycologic eradication rates (absence of colony forming units in quantitative culture at the end of therapy, Day 14), as well as mycologic relapse rates (4 weeks after the end of treatment) were also similar between the treatment arms (see Table 36 ). Table 36: Noxafil Oral Suspension Clinical Success, Mycological Eradication, and Relapse Rates in Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Noxafil Fluconazole Clinical Success at End of Therapy (Day 14) 155/169 (91.7%) 148/160 (92.5%) Clinical Relapse (4 Weeks after End of Therapy) 45/155 (29.0%) 52/148 (35.1%) Mycological Eradication (absence of CFU) at End of Therapy (Day 14) 88/169 (52.1%) 80/160 (50.0%) Mycological Relapse (4 Weeks after End of Treatment) 49/88 (55.6%) 51/80 (63.7%) Mycologic response rates, using a criterion for success as a posttreatment quantitative culture with ≤20 colony forming units (CFU/mL) were also similar between the two groups (Noxafil 68.0%, fluconazole 68.1%). The clinical significance of this finding is unknown.

Noxafil Oral Suspension Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Refractory to Treatment with Fluconazole

or Itraconazole Noxafil Oral Suspension Study 4 was a noncomparative study of Noxafil oral suspension in HIV-infected subjects with OPC that was refractory to treatment with fluconazole or itraconazole. An episode of OPC was considered refractory if there was failure to improve or worsening of OPC after a standard course of therapy with fluconazole greater than or equal to 100 mg/day for at least 10 consecutive days or itraconazole 200 mg/day for at least 10 consecutive days and treatment with either fluconazole or itraconazole had not been discontinued for more than 14 days prior to treatment with Noxafil. Of the 199 subjects enrolled in this study, 89 subjects met these strict criteria for refractory infection.

Forty-five subjects with refractory OPC were treated with Noxafil oral suspension 400 mg twice daily for 3 days, followed by 400 mg once daily for 25 days with an option for further treatment during a 3 month maintenance period. Following a dosing amendment, a further 44 subjects were treated with posaconazole 400 mg twice daily for 28 days. The efficacy of Noxafil was assessed by the clinical success (cure or improvement) rate after 4 weeks of treatment.

The clinical success rate was 74.2% (66/89). The clinical success rates for both the original and the amended dosing regimens were similar (73.3% and 75.0%, respectively).

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Noxafil?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Noxafil Prices