Mepron Drug Information

Generic name: ATOVAQUONE

Antimalarial [EPC] Antiprotozoal [EPC]

Save on Mepron at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Mepron

Prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia MEPRON oral suspension is indicated for the prevention of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PCP) in adults and adolescents (aged 13 years and older) who cannot tolerate trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX).

Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate

Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia MEPRON oral suspension is indicated for the acute oral treatment of mild-to-moderate PCP in adults and adolescents (aged 13 years and older) who cannot tolerate TMP-SMX.

Limitations of Use

Clinical experience with MEPRON for the treatment of PCP has been limited to subjects with mild-to-moderate PCP (alveolar-arterial oxygen diffusion gradient ≤45 mm Hg). Treatment of more severe episodes of PCP with MEPRON has not been studied. The efficacy of MEPRON in subjects who are failing therapy with TMP-SMX has also not been studied.

Dosage & Administration of Mepron

Dosage for the Prevention of P. jirovecii Pneumonia The recommended oral dosage is 1,500 mg (10 mL) once daily administered with food.

Dosage for the Treatment of Mild-to-Moderate

P. jirovecii Pneumonia The recommended oral dosage is 750 mg (5 mL) twice daily (total daily dose = 1,500 mg) administered with food for 21 days.

Important Administration Instructions Administer

MEPRON oral suspension with food to avoid low plasma atovaquone concentrations that may limit response to therapy. MEPRON Foil Pouch • Open each 5-mL pouch by folding along the dotted line and tearing open at horizontal slit as directed by arrow on pouch. • For a 5-mL dose, take entire contents either by placing directly into the mouth or by dispensing into a dosing spoon (5 mL) or cup prior to administration by mouth. • For a 10-mL dose, take the entire contents of 2 pouches. MEPRON Bottle Shake bottle gently before administering the recommended dosage.

Side Effects of Mepron

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared with rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Additionally, because many subjects who participated in clinical trials with MEPRON had complications of advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease, it was often difficult to distinguish adverse reactions caused by MEPRON from those caused by underlying medical conditions. PCP Prevention Trials In 2 clinical trials, MEPRON oral suspension was compared with dapsone or aerosolized pentamidine in HIV-1–infected adolescent (13 to 18 years) and adult subjects at risk of PCP (CD4 count <200 cells/mm 3 or a prior episode of PCP) and unable to tolerate TMP-SMX.

Adverse reaction data were collected only for adverse reactions requiring discontinuation of treatment, which occurred at similar frequencies in subjects treated with MEPRON oral suspension or dapsone ( Table 1 ). Among subjects taking neither dapsone nor atovaquone at enrollment (n = 487), adverse reactions requiring discontinuation of treatment occurred in 43% of subjects treated with dapsone and 20% of subjects treated with MEPRON oral suspension. Gastrointestinal adverse reactions (nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting) were more frequently reported in subjects treated with MEPRON oral suspension ( Table 1 ).

Table 1. Percentage (>2%) of Subjects with Selected Adverse Reactions Requiring Discontinuation of Treatment in the Dapsone Comparative PCP Prevention Trial Aerosolized Pentamidine Comparative Trial: In the aerosolized pentamidine comparative trial (n = 549), the majority of subjects were white (79%), male (92%), and were primary prophylaxis patients at enrollment (58%); the mean age was 38 years. Table 2 summarizes the clinical adverse reactions reported by ≥20% of the subjects receiving either the 1,500-mg dose of MEPRON oral suspension or aerosolized pentamidine.

Rash occurred more often in subjects treated with MEPRON oral suspension (46%) than in subjects treated with aerosolized pentamidine (28%). Treatment‑limiting adverse reactions occurred in 25% of subjects treated with MEPRON oral suspension 1,500 mg once daily and in 7% of subjects treated with aerosolized pentamidine. The most frequent adverse reaction requiring discontinuation of dosing in the group receiving aerosolized pentamidine was bronchospasm (2%).

Table 2. Percentage (≥20%) of Subjects with Selected Adverse Reactions in the Aerosolized Pentamidine Comparative PCP Prevention Trial % of subjects receiving the recommended dose of MEPRON oral suspension (1,500 mg once daily) included vomiting, sweating, flu syndrome, sinusitis, pruritus, insomnia, depression, and myalgia. PCP Treatment Trials Safety information is presented from 2 clinical efficacy trials of the MEPRON tablet formulation: 1 a randomized, double‑blind trial comparing MEPRON tablets with TMP‑SMX in subjects with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and mild‑to‑moderate PCP ≤45 mm Hg and PaO 2 ≥60 mm Hg on room air; 2 a randomized, open-label trial comparing MEPRON tablets with intravenous (IV) pentamidine isethionate in subjects with mild‑to‑moderate PCP who could not tolerate trimethoprim or sulfa antimicrobials.

Table 3 summarizes all clinical adverse reactions reported by ≥10% of the trial population regardless of attribution. Nine percent of subjects who received MEPRON and 24% of subjects who received TMP‑SMX discontinued therapy due to an adverse reaction. Among the subjects who discontinued, 4% of subjects receiving MEPRON and 8% of subjects in the TMP-SMX group discontinued therapy due to rash.

The incidence of adverse reactions with MEPRON oral suspension at the recommended dose (750 mg twice daily) was similar to that seen with the tablet formulation. Table 3. Percentage (≥10%) of Subjects with Selected Adverse Reactions in the TMP-SMX Comparative PCP Treatment Trial 9 Two percent of subjects treated with MEPRON and 7% of subjects treated with TMP‑SMX had therapy prematurely discontinued due to elevations in ALT/AST.

Table 4 summarizes the clinical adverse reactions reported by ≥10% of the primary therapy trial population regardless of attribution. Fewer subjects who received MEPRON reported adverse reactions than subjects who received pentamidine (63% vs. 72%). However, only 7% of subjects discontinued treatment with MEPRON due to adverse reactions, while 41% of subjects who received pentamidine discontinued treatment for this reason.

Of the 5 subjects who discontinued therapy with MEPRON, 3 reported rash (4%). Rash was not severe in any subject. The most frequently cited reasons for discontinuation of pentamidine therapy were hypoglycemia (11%) and vomiting (9%).

Table 4. One subject (1%) receiving MEPRON had elevated creatinine and BUN levels and 1 subject (1%) had elevated amylase levels. In this trial, elevated levels of amylase occurred in subjects (8% versus 4%) receiving MEPRON tablets or pentamidine, respectively.

Postmarketing Experience

The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of MEPRON oral suspension. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders Methemoglobinemia, thrombocytopenia.

Immune System Disorders Hypersensitivity reactions including angioedema, bronchospasm, throat tightness, and urticaria. Eye Disorders Vortex keratopathy. Gastrointestinal Disorders Pancreatitis.

Hepatobiliary Disorders Hepatitis, fatal liver failure. Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders Erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), skin desquamation, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). Renal and Urinary Disorders Acute renal impairment.

Table 1. Percentage (>2%) of Subjects with Selected Adverse Reactions Requiring Discontinuation of Treatment in the Dapsone Comparative PCP Prevention Trial
Adverse ReactionAll Subjects
MEPRON Oral Suspension 1,500 mg/day (n = 536) %Dapsone 100 mg/day (n = 521) %
Rash6.38.8
Nausea4.10.6
Diarrhea3.20.2
Vomiting2.20.6
Table 2. Percentage (≥20%) of Subjects with Selected Adverse Reactions in the Aerosolized Pentamidine Comparative PCP Prevention Trial
Adverse ReactionMEPRON Oral Suspension 1,500 mg/day (n = 175) %Aerosolized Pentamidine (n = 186) %
Diarrhea4235
Rash3928
Headache2822
Nausea2623
Fever2518
Rhinitis2417
Table 3. Percentage (≥10%) of Subjects with Selected Adverse Reactions in the TMP-SMX Comparative PCP Treatment Trial
Adverse ReactionMEPRON Tablets (n = 203) %TMP ‑ SMX (n = 205) %
Rash (including maculopapular)2334
Nausea2144
Diarrhea197
Headache1622
Vomiting1435
Fever1425
Insomnia109
Table 4. Percentage (≥10%) of Subjects with Selected Adverse Reactions in the Pentamidine Comparative PCP Treatment Trial (Primary Therapy Group)
Adverse ReactionMEPRON Tablets (n = 73) %Pentamidine (n = 71) %
Fever4025
Nausea2237
Rash2213
Diarrhea2131
Insomnia1914
Headache1828
Vomiting1417
Cough141
Sweat103
Monilia, oral103

Warnings & Cautions for Mepron

Risk of Limited Oral Absorption Absorption of orally administered MEPRON oral suspension is limited but can be significantly increased when the drug is taken with food. Failure to administer MEPRON oral suspension with food may result in lower plasma atovaquone concentrations and may limit response to therapy. Consider therapy with other agents in patients who have difficulty taking MEPRON oral suspension with food or in patients who have gastrointestinal disorders that may limit absorption of oral medications.

Hepatotoxicity Cases of cholestatic hepatitis, elevated liver enzymes, and fatal liver failure have been reported in patients treated with atovaquone. If treating patients with severe hepatic impairment, closely monitor patients following administration of MEPRON.

Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Cases of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens ‑ Johnson Syndrome (SJS), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and erythema multiforme (EM) have been reported in patients treated with MEPRON. SCARs can be life ‑ threatening or fatal. If symptoms or signs of SCARs develop, discontinue MEPRON immediately and institute appropriate therapy.

Patients who have developed SCARs with the use of MEPRON must not receive MEPRON.

Drug Interactions with Mepron

Rifampin/Rifabutin

Concomitant administration of rifampin or rifabutin and MEPRON oral suspension is known to reduce atovaquone concentrations. Concomitant administration of MEPRON oral suspension and rifampin or rifabutin is not recommended.

Tetracycline

Concomitant administration of tetracycline and MEPRON oral suspension has been associated with a reduction in plasma concentrations of atovaquone. Caution should be used when prescribing tetracycline concomitantly with MEPRON oral suspension. Monitor patients for potential loss of efficacy of MEPRON if coadministration is necessary.

Metoclopramide Metoclopramide may reduce the bioavailability of atovaquone and should be used only if other antiemetics are not available.

Indinavir

Concomitant administration of atovaquone and indinavir did not result in any change in the steady-state AUC and C max of indinavir but resulted in a decrease in the C trough of indinavir. Caution should be exercised when prescribing MEPRON oral suspension with indinavir due to the decrease in trough concentrations of indinavir.

Pregnancy Safety for Mepron

Pregnancy Risk Summary Available data from postmarketing experience with use of MEPRON in pregnant women are insufficient to identify a drug-associated risk for major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Pregnant women with HIV who are infected with PCP are at increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (see Clinical Considerations). Atovaquone given orally by gavage to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis did not cause fetal malformations at plasma concentrations up to 3 times and 0.5 times, respectively, the estimated human exposure based on steady-state plasma concentrations (see Data).

The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is respectively.

Clinical Considerations Disease-Associated Maternal and/or Embryo/Fetal Risk: Pregnant women with HIV who are infected with PCP are at increased risk of severe illness and maternal death associated with PCP compared with non-pregnant women. Data Animal Data: Atovaquone administered in oral doses of 250, 500, and 1,000 mg/kg/day to pregnant rats during organogenesis (Gestation Day 6 to GD15) did not cause maternal or embryo-fetal toxicity at doses up to 1,000 mg/kg/day corresponding to maternal plasma concentrations approximately 3 times the estimated human exposure during the treatment of PCP based on steady-state plasma concentrations. In pregnant rabbits, atovaquone administered in oral doses of 300, 600, and 1,200 mg/kg/day during organogenesis (GD6 to GD18) caused decreased fetal body length at a maternally toxic dose of 1,200 mg/kg/day corresponding to a plasma concentration that is approximately 0.5 times the estimated human exposure based on steady-state plasma concentrations.

In a pre- and post-natal study in rats, atovaquone administered in oral doses of 250, 500, and 1,000 mg/kg/day from GD15 until Lactation Day (LD) 20 did not impair the growth or developmental effects in first generation offspring at doses up to 1,000 mg/kg/day corresponding to approximately 3 times the estimated human exposure based on steady-state plasma concentrations during the treatment of PCP. Atovaquone crossed the placenta and was present in fetal rat and rabbit tissue.

Pediatric Use of Mepron

Pediatric Use Evidence of safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients (aged 12 years and younger) has not been established. In a trial of MEPRON oral suspension administered once daily with food for 12 days to 27 HIV-1–infected, asymptomatic infants and children aged between 1 month and 13 years, the pharmacokinetics of atovaquone were age-dependent. The average steady-state plasma atovaquone concentrations in the 24 subjects with available concentration data are shown in Table 5.

Table 5. Average Steady-State Plasma Atovaquone Concentrations in Pediatric Subjects C ss = Concentration at steady state.

Contraindications for Mepron

MEPRON oral suspension is contraindicated in patients who develop or have a history of hypersensitivity reactions to atovaquone or any of the components of MEPRON. Known serious allergic/hypersensitivity reaction to atovaquone or any of the components of MEPRON.

Overdosage Information for Mepron

Overdoses up to 31,500 mg of atovaquone have been reported. In one such patient who also took an unspecified dose of dapsone, methemoglobinemia occurred. Rash has also been reported after overdose.

There is no known antidote for atovaquone, and it is currently unknown if atovaquone is dialyzable.

Clinical Studies of Mepron

Prevention of PCP

The indication for prevention of PCP is based on the results of 2 clinical trials comparing MEPRON oral suspension with dapsone or aerosolized pentamidine in HIV-1–infected adolescent (aged 13 to 18 years) and adult subjects at risk of PCP (CD4 count <200 cells/mm 3 or a prior episode of PCP) and unable to tolerate TMP‑SMX. Median follow-up was 24 months. Subjects randomized to the dapsone arm who were seropositive for Toxoplasma gondii and had a CD4 count <100 cells/mm 3 also received pyrimethamine and folinic acid.

PCP event rates are shown in Table 7. Mortality rates were similar. Median follow-up was 11.3 months.

The results of the PCP event rates appear in Table 7. Mortality rates were similar among the groups. Table 7.

Confirmed or Presumed/Probable PCP Events (As-Treated Analysis) a 0.77 1.47 1.14 An analysis of all PCP events (intent-to-treat analysis) for both trials showed results similar to those shown in Table 7.

Treatment of PCP

The indication for treatment of mild‑to‑moderate PCP is based on the results of 2 efficacy trials: a randomized, double‑blind trial comparing MEPRON tablets with TMP‑SMX in subjects with HIV/AIDS and mild‑to‑moderate PCP (defined in the protocol as ≤45 mm Hg and PaO 2 ≥60 mm Hg on room air) and a randomized open-label trial comparing MEPRON tablets with IV pentamidine isethionate in subjects with mild‑to‑moderate PCP who could not tolerate trimethoprim or sulfa antimicrobials. Both trials were conducted with the tablet formulation using 750 mg 3 times daily. Results from these efficacy trials established a relationship between plasma atovaquone concentrations and successful outcome.

Successful outcome was defined as improvement in clinical and respiratory measures persisting at least 4 weeks after cessation of therapy. TMP ‑ SMX Comparative Trial This double‑blind, randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of MEPRON tablets with that of TMP‑SMX for the treatment of subjects with HIV/AIDS and histologically confirmed PCP. Only subjects with mild‑to‑moderate PCP were eligible for enrollment.

A total of 408 subjects were enrolled into the trial. The majority of subjects were white (66%) and male (95%); the mean age was 36 years. Eighty‑six subjects without histologic confirmation of PCP were excluded from the efficacy analyses.

Improvement in clinical and respiratory measures was assessed using a composite of parameters that included oral body temperature, respiratory rate, severity scores for cough, dyspnea, and chest pain/tightness. Therapy failures included lack of response, treatment discontinuation due to an adverse experience, and unevaluable. There was a significant difference ( P = 0.03) in mortality rates between the treatment groups favoring TMP-SMX.

Of the 13 subjects with confirmed PCP and treated with MEPRON who died, 4 died of PCP and 5 died with a combination of bacterial infections and PCP; bacterial infections did not appear to be a factor in any of the 4 deaths among TMP‑SMX‑treated subjects. A correlation between plasma atovaquone concentrations and death demonstrated that subjects with lower plasma concentrations were more likely to die. Sixty-two percent of subjects on MEPRON and 64% of subjects on TMP‑SMX were classified as protocol-defined therapy successes ( Table 8 ).

Table 8. Outcome of Treatment for PCP-Positive Subjects Enrolled in the TMP-SMX Comparative Trial The failure rate due to lack of response was significantly higher for subjects receiving MEPRON, while the failure rate due to an adverse reaction was significantly higher for subjects receiving TMP‑SMX. Pentamidine Comparative Trial This unblinded, randomized trial was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of MEPRON with that of pentamidine for the treatment of histologically-confirmed mild or moderate PCP in subjects with HIV/AIDS.

Approximately 80% of the subjects either had a history of intolerance to trimethoprim or sulfa antimicrobials (the primary therapy group) or were experiencing intolerance to TMP‑SMX with treatment of an episode of PCP at the time of enrollment in the trial (the salvage treatment group). The majority of subjects were white (72%) and male (97%); the mean age was approximately 37 years. Thirty-nine subjects without histologic confirmation of PCP were excluded from the efficacy analyses.

Of the 135 subjects with histologically-confirmed PCP, 70 were randomized to receive MEPRON and 65 to pentamidine. One hundred and ten of these were in the primary therapy group and 25 were in the salvage therapy group. One subject in the primary therapy group randomized to receive pentamidine did not receive trial medication.

The therapeutic outcomes for the 134 subjects who received trial medication in this trial are presented in Table 9. Table 9.

Table 7. Confirmed or Presumed/Probable PCP Events (As-Treated Analysis) a
a Those events occurring during or within 30 days of stopping assigned treatment. b Relative risk <1 favors MEPRON and values >1 favor comparator. Trial results did not show superiority of MEPRON to the comparator. c The confidence level of the interval for the dapsone comparative trial was 95% and for the pentamidine comparative trial was 97.5%.
AssessmentTrial 1Trial 2
MEPRON Oral Suspension 1,500 mg/day (n = 527)Dapsone 100 mg/day (n = 510)MEPRON Oral Suspension 750 mg/day (n = 188)MEPRON Oral Suspension 1,500 mg/day (n = 172)Aerosolized Pentamidine 300 mg/month (n = 169)
%1519231817
Relative Risk b (CI) c0.77 (0.57, 1.04)1.47 (0.86, 2.50)1.14 (0.63, 2.06)
Table 8. Outcome of Treatment for PCP-Positive Subjects Enrolled in the TMP-SMX Comparative Trial
a As defined by the protocol and described in trial description above.
Outcome of Therapy aNumber of Subjects (%)
MEPRON Tablets (n = 160)TMP-SMX (n = 162)
Therapy success9962%10364%
Therapy failure due to:
-Lack of response2817%106%
-Adverse reaction117%3320%
-Unevaluable2214%1610%
Required alternate PCP therapy during trial5534%5534%
Table 9. Outcome of Treatment for PCP-Positive Subjects (%) Enrolled in the Pentamidine Comparative Trial
Outcome of TherapyPrimary TreatmentSalvage Treatment
MEPRON (n = 56)Pentamidine (n = 53)MEPRON (n = 14)Pentamidine (n = 11)
Therapy success3257%2140%1393%764%
Therapy failure due to:
-Lack of response1629%917%00
-Adverse reaction23.6%1936%0327%
-Unevaluable611%48%17%19%
Required alternate PCP therapy during trial1934%2955%0436%

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Mepron?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Mepron Prices