Lialda Drug Information
Generic name: MESALAMINE
Aminosalicylate [EPC]
Uses of Lialda
® is indicated for the: induction and maintenance of remission in adult patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. treatment of mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients weighing at least 24 kg. LIALDA is an aminosalicylate indicated for the: induction and maintenance of remission in adult patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. treatment of mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients weighing at least 24 kg.
Dosage & Administration of Lialda
| 24 kg to 35 kg | 2.4 g (two 1.2-g tablets) |
|---|---|
| Greater than 35 kg to 50 kg | 3.6 g (three 1.2-g tablets) |
| Greater than 50 kg | 4.8 g (four 1.2-g tablets) |
Side Effects of Lialda
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Adults Induction The most common adverse reactions occurring in at least 1% of LIALDA- or placebo-treated adult patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis in two eight-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (Study 1 and Study 2) are listed in Table 2. Table 2: Adverse Reactions Reported in at least 1% of patients in at least one LIALDA group and greater than placebo in Two Eight-Week, Placebo-Controlled Trials of Induction Therapy (Study 1 and Study 2) in Adults with Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis Adverse Reaction LIALDA 2.4 g once daily LIALDA 4.8 g once daily Placebo (n=177) (n=179) (n=179) Headache 6% 3% <1% Flatulence 4% 3% 3% Liver Function Test Abnormal <1% 2% 1% Alopecia 0 1% 0 Pruritus <1% 1% 1% Pancreatitis occurred in less than 1% of patients during induction in clinical trials and resulted in discontinuation of therapy with LIALDA in patients experiencing this event. Maintenance of Remission A LIALDA dosage of 2.4 g/day, administered as either 1.2 g twice daily or 2.4 g once daily, was evaluated for safety in three maintenance trials in patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis: a 6-month double-blind, active-controlled study (Study 3) and two 12- to 14-month open-label studies.
The most common adverse reactions with LIALDA in these maintenance trials are listed in Table 3. Table 3: Adverse Reactions Reported in at least 1% of patients in Three Trials of Maintenance of Remission in Adults with Ulcerative Colitis LIALDA 2.4 g/day Administered either as 1.2 g twice daily or 2.4 g once daily (n=1082) Adverse Reaction % Headache 3% Liver function test abnormal 2% Abdominal pain 2% Diarrhea 2% Abdominal distension 1% Abdominal pain upper 1% Dyspepsia 1% Back pain 1% Rash 1% Arthralgia 1% Fatigue 1% Hypertension 1% The following adverse reactions, presented by body system, were reported in less than 1% of LIALDA-treated patients with ulcerative colitis in either induction or maintenance trials: Cardiac Disorder : tachycardia Ear and Labyrinth Disorders : ear pain Gastrointestinal Disorders : abdominal distention, colitis, diarrhea, flatulence, nausea, pancreatitis, rectal polyp, vomiting General Disorders and Administrative Site Disorders : asthenia, face edema, fatigue, pyrexia Investigations : decreased platelet count Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders : arthralgia, back pain Nervous System Disorders : dizziness, somnolence, tremor Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders : pharyngolaryngeal pain Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders : acne, prurigo, rash, alopecia, pruritus, urticaria Vascular Disorders : hypertension, hypotension Pediatrics LIALDA was evaluated in 105 pediatric patients 5 through 17 years of age with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis . The adverse reaction profile was similar to that of adults. The most common adverse reactions reported in at least 5% of pediatric patients treated with LIALDA were: abdominal pain, upper respiratory tract infection, vomiting, anemia, headache, and viral infection.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of LIALDA or other mesalamine-containing products. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Body as a Whole : lupus-like syndrome, drug fever Cardiac Disorders : pericarditis, pericardial effusion, myocarditis Gastrointestinal : cholecystitis, gastritis, gastroenteritis, gastrointestinal bleeding, perforated peptic ulcer Hepatic : jaundice, cholestatic jaundice, hepatitis, liver necrosis, liver failure, hepatotoxicity, Kawasaki-like syndrome including changes in liver enzymes Hematologic : agranulocytosis, aplastic anemia Immune System Disorders : anaphylactic reaction, angioedema Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders : myalgia, lupus-like syndrome Neurological/Psychiatric : peripheral neuropathy, Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, intracranial hypertension Renal Disorders : renal failure, interstitial nephritis, nephrogenic diabetes insipidus, nephrolithiasis Urine discoloration occurring ex-vivo caused by contact of mesalamine, including inactive metabolite, with surfaces or water treated with hypochlorite-containing bleach Respiratory, Thoracic and Mediastinal Disorders : interstitial lung disease, hypersensitivity pneumonitis (including interstitial pneumonitis, allergic alveolitis, eosinophilic pneumonitis), pleurisy/pleuritis Skin : psoriasis, pyoderma gangrenosum, erythema nodosum, photosensitivity, SJS/TEN, DRESS, and AGEP Urogenital : reversible oligospermia
Warnings & Cautions for Lialda
Renal Impairment Renal impairment, including minimal change disease, acute and chronic interstitial
nephritis, and, rarely, renal failure, has been reported in patients given products such as LIALDA that contain mesalamine or are converted to mesalamine. In animal studies, the kidney was the principal organ of mesalamine toxicity . Evaluate renal function prior to initiation of LIALDA therapy and periodically while on therapy. Evaluate the risks and benefits of using LIALDA in patients with known renal impairment, history of renal disease, or taking concomitant nephrotoxic drugs.
Discontinue LIALDA if renal function deteriorates while on therapy .
Mesalamine-Induced Acute Intolerance Syndrome Mesalamine has been associated with an acute intolerance
syndrome that may be difficult to distinguish from an exacerbation of ulcerative colitis. Although the exact frequency of occurrence has not been determined, it has occurred in 3% of patients in controlled clinical trials of mesalamine or sulfasalazine. Symptoms include cramping, acute abdominal pain, and bloody diarrhea, and sometimes fever, headache, and rash.
Monitor patients closely for worsening of these symptoms while on treatment. If acute intolerance syndrome is suspected, promptly discontinue treatment with LIALDA.
Hypersensitivity Reactions Hypersensitivity reactions have been reported in patients taking sulfasalazine. Some
of these patients may have a similar reaction to LIALDA tablets or to other compounds that contain or are converted to mesalamine. As with sulfasalazine, mesalamine-induced hypersensitivity reactions may present as internal organ involvement, including myocarditis, pericarditis, nephritis, hepatitis, pneumonitis, and hematologic abnormalities. Evaluate patients immediately if signs or symptoms of a hypersensitivity reaction are present.
Discontinue LIALDA if an alternative etiology for the signs or symptoms cannot be established.
Hepatic Failure
There have been reports of hepatic failure in patients with pre-existing liver disease who have been administered mesalamine. Evaluate the risks and benefits of using LIALDA in patients with known liver impairment.
Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions Severe cutaneous adverse reactions, such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome
(SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) have been reported with the use of mesalamine . Discontinue LIALDA at the first appearance of signs or symptoms of severe cutaneous adverse reactions or other signs of hypersensitivity and consider further evaluation.
Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Obstruction Pyloric stenosis or other organic or functional obstruction
in the upper gastrointestinal tract may cause prolonged gastric retention of LIALDA, which would delay mesalamine release in the colon. Avoid LIALDA in patients at risk of upper gastrointestinal tract obstruction.
Photosensitivity Patients with pre-existing skin conditions such as atopic dermatitis and atopic
eczema have reported more severe photosensitivity reactions. Advise patients to avoid sun exposure, wear protective clothing, and use a broad-spectrum sunscreen when outdoors.
Nephrolithiasis Cases of nephrolithiasis have been reported with the use of mesalamine
including stones with a 100% mesalamine content. Mesalamine-containing stones are radiotransparent and undetectable by standard radiography or computed tomography (CT). Ensure adequate hydration during treatment with LIALDA.
Interference with Laboratory Tests Use of
LIALDA may lead to spuriously elevated test results when measuring urinary normetanephrine by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection because of the similarity in the chromatograms of normetanephrine and the main metabolite of mesalamine, N-acetyl-5-aminosalicylic acid (N-Ac-5-ASA). Consider an alternative, selective assay for normetanephrine.
Drug Interactions with Lialda
Nephrotoxic Agents, Including Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs
The concurrent use of mesalamine with known nephrotoxic agents, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), may increase the risk of nephrotoxicity. Monitor patients taking nephrotoxic drugs for changes in renal function and mesalamine-related adverse reactions .
Azathioprine and 6-Mercaptopurine
The concurrent use of mesalamine with azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine and/or any other drugs known to cause myelotoxicity may increase the risk for blood disorders, bone marrow failure, and associated complications. If concomitant use of LIALDA and azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine cannot be avoided, monitor blood tests, including complete blood cell counts and platelet counts.
Interference with Urinary Normetanephrine Measurements Use of
LIALDA may lead to spuriously elevated test results when measuring urinary normetanephrine by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection . Consider an alternative, selective assay for normetanephrine.
Pregnancy Safety for Lialda
Pregnancy Risk Summary Published data from meta-analyses, cohort studies, and case series on the use of mesalamine during pregnancy have not reliably informed an association with mesalamine and major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes (see Data ). There are adverse effects on maternal and fetal outcomes associated with ulcerative colitis in pregnancy (see Clinical Considerations ). In animal reproduction studies, there were no adverse developmental outcomes with administration of oral mesalamine during organogenesis to pregnant rats and rabbits at doses 1.8 and 2.9 times, respectively, the maximum recommended human dose (see Data ). The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated populations is unknown. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriages in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively.
Clinical Considerations Disease-associated maternal and embryo/fetal risk Published data suggest that increased disease activity is associated with the risk of developing adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with ulcerative colitis. Adverse pregnancy outcomes include preterm delivery (before 37 weeks of gestation), low birth weight (less than 2500 g) infants, and small for gestational age at birth. Data Human Data Published data from meta-analyses, cohort studies, and case series on the use of mesalamine during early pregnancy (first trimester) and throughout pregnancy have not reliably informed an association of mesalamine and major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes.
There is no clear evidence that mesalamine exposure in early pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations, including cardiac malformations. Published epidemiologic studies have important methodological limitations which hinder interpretation of the data, including inability to control for confounders, such as underlying maternal disease, maternal use of concomitant medications, and missing information on the dose and duration of use for mesalamine products. Animal Data Reproduction studies with mesalamine during organogenesis have been performed in rats at doses up to 1000 mg/kg/day (1.8 times the maximum recommended human dose based on a body surface area comparison) and rabbits at doses up to 800 mg/kg/day (2.9 times the maximum recommended human dose based on a body surface area comparison) and have revealed no evidence of harm to the fetus due to mesalamine.
Pediatric Use of Lialda
Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of LIALDA have been established for the treatment of mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis in pediatric patients weighing at least 24 kg. Use of LIALDA in this population is supported by evidence from adequate and well-controlled trials in adults, a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group trial in 105 pediatric patients 5 to 17 years of age, and additional pharmacokinetic analyses. The safety profile in pediatric patients was similar to that observed in adults . The safety and effectiveness of LIALDA have not been established in patients weighing less than 24 kg.
Contraindications for Lialda
is contraindicated in patients with known or suspected hypersensitivity to salicylates, aminosalicylates, or to any of the ingredients of LIALDA . Known or suspected hypersensitivity to salicylates or aminosalicylates or to any of the ingredients of LIALDA.
Overdosage Information for Lialda
is an aminosalicylate, and symptoms of salicylate toxicity may include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, tachypnea, hyperpnea, tinnitus, and neurologic symptoms (headache, dizziness, confusion, seizures). Severe intoxication with salicylates may lead to electrolyte and blood pH imbalance, and potentially end organ (e.g., renal and liver) damage. There is no specific known antidote for mesalamine overdose; however, conventional therapy for salicylate toxicity may be beneficial in the event of acute overdosage and may include gastrointestinal tract decontamination to prevent further absorption. Correct fluid and electrolyte imbalance by the administration of appropriate intravenous therapy and maintain adequate renal function.
LIALDA is a pH-dependent, delayed-release product and this factor should be considered when treating a suspected overdose.
Clinical Studies of Lialda
Adults with Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis
Induction of Remission Two similarly designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (Study 1, NCT00503243 and Study 2, NCT00548574 ) were conducted in 517 adult patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. The study population was primarily Caucasian (80%), had a mean age of 42 years (6% age 65 years or older), and was approximately 50% male. Both studies used LIALDA dosages of 2.4 g and 4.8 g administered once daily for 8 weeks, except in Study 1 the 2.4 g dosage was administered as two divided doses (i.e., 1.2 g twice daily). The primary efficacy endpoint in both trials was to compare the percentage of patients in remission after 8 weeks of treatment for the LIALDA treatment groups versus placebo.
Remission was defined as an Ulcerative Colitis Disease Activity Index (UC-DAI) of ≤1, with scores of zero for rectal bleeding and for stool frequency, and a sigmoidoscopy score reduction of 1 point or more from baseline. In both studies, the LIALDA dosages of 2.4 g and 4.8 g once daily demonstrated superiority over placebo in the primary efficacy endpoint (Table 6). Both LIALDA dosages also provided consistent benefit in secondary efficacy parameters, including clinical improvement, clinical remission, and sigmoidoscopic improvement. Both LIALDA dosages had similar efficacy profiles.
Table 6: Proportion of Adult Patients with Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis in Remission at Week 8 in Two Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Induction Trials Dose Study 1 (n=262) n/N (%) Study 2 (n=255) n/N (%) LIALDA 2.4 g/day 30/88 34/84 LIALDA 4.8 g/day 26/89 35/85 Placebo 11/85 19/86 Maintenance of Remission A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active comparator study (Study 3, NCT00151892) was conducted in a total of 826 adult patients in remission from ulcerative colitis. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either LIALDA 2.4 g administered once daily or another mesalamine delayed-release product administered as 0.8 g twice daily. The study population had a mean age of 45 years (8% age 65 years or older), were 52% male, and were primarily Caucasian (64%). Maintenance of remission was assessed using a modified UC-DAI. For this trial, maintenance of remission was based on maintaining endoscopic remission defined as a modified UC-DAI endoscopy subscore of ≤1. An endoscopy subscore of 0 represented normal mucosal appearance with intact vascular pattern and no friability or granulation.
For this trial the endoscopy score definition of 1 (mild disease) was modified such that it could include erythema, decreased vascular pattern, and minimal granularity; however, it could not include friability. The proportion of patients who maintained remission at Month 6 in this study using LIALDA 2.4 g once daily (84%) was similar to the comparator (82%).
Pediatric Patients with Mildly to Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis Weighing at Least
24 kg A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study (NCT02093663) was conducted in pediatric patients aged 5 through 17 years with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis to determine the safety and effectiveness of LIALDA. The study consisted of two treatment phases, an initial 8-week phase and a 26-week phase. The overall population consisted of 105 patients, of whom 27 patients participated in both the 8-week and 26-week phases. Each phase included two dosage arms and patients were randomized at the beginning of each phase in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by body weight group.
Patients received a low or a high weight-based dosage of LIALDA in four weight groups. Because of the small number of patients in the lowest body weight group (0 in the 8-week phase and 3 in the 26-week phase), the safety and effectiveness of LIALDA in patients weighing less than 24 kg have not been established. Patients were eligible for the initial 8-week phase if they had mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis as defined by the UC-DAI score of at least 4 with an endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3. In the 53 patients enrolled in the initial phase, the mean age and weight of patients was 14 years and 53 kg, the mean (SD) baseline UC-DAI score was 5.8, 93% were white, and 59% were male.
The primary endpoint was defined by the partial UC-DAI less than or equal to 1 (with rectal bleeding equal to 0, stool frequency less than or equal to 1, and Physician's Global Assessment equal to 0). Of the 26 patients in the recommended LIALDA dosage arm, 65% achieved the primary endpoint after 8 weeks of treatment. During the initial 8-week phase, fewer patients who received the recommended LIALDA dosage were discontinued from the study due to ulcerative colitis (0/26, 0%) compared to patients who received a lower than recommended LIALDA dosage (8/27, 30%). Patients who met the primary endpoint at 8 weeks were eligible to continue treatment in the 26-week phase. Patients were also eligible to enter the 26-week phase without having participated in the 8-week phase if they had a UC-DAI score of less than or equal to 2 with an endoscopic subscore of 0 or 1 (modified to exclude friability). There were 87 patients enrolled in the 26-week phase.
The mean age and weight of patients were 14 years and 54 kg; 97% were white and 55% were female. Of the 42 patients in the recommended LIALDA dosage arm, 55% achieved the primary endpoint, which was defined the same as in the 8-week phase. In the 26-week phase, the arm with a higher than recommended LIALDA dosage was not more effective and is not recommended . Other Endpoints Clinical remission, defined by a Mayo stool frequency subscore equal to 0 or 1, Mayo rectal bleeding subscore equal to 0, and a Mayo endoscopic subscore equal to 0 or 1 (modified to exclude friability) or 0 on the UC-DAI, was determined for patients with available endoscopic assessment after completion of the 26-week phase.
Patients without endoscopic data at week 26 were assumed not to have achieved clinical remission. Of the 42 patients in the recommended LIALDA dosage arm, 36% achieved clinical remission. Clinical remission could not be assessed in the initial 8-week phase because there were too few patients who underwent endoscopy.
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Lialda?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Lialda Prices