Faslodex Drug Information

Generic name: FULVESTRANT

Estrogen Receptor Antagonist [EPC]

Save on Faslodex at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Faslodex

  • Monotherapy FASLODEX is indicated for the treatment of:
  • Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women not previously treated with endocrine therapy, or
  • HR-positive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following endocrine therapy. Combination Therapy FASLODEX is indicated for the treatment of:
  • HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women in combination with ribociclib as initial endocrine based therapy or following disease progression on endocrine therapy.
  • HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with palbociclib or abemaciclib in women with disease progression after endocrine therapy. FASLODEX is an estrogen receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of:
  • HR-positive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women with disease progression following endocrine therapy.
  • HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer in combination with palbociclib or abemaciclib in women with disease progression after endocrine therapy.

Dosage & Administration of Faslodex

Dose Modification Monotherapy Hepatic Impairment

A dose of 250 mg is recommended for patients with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) to be administered intramuscularly into the buttock (gluteal area) slowly (1 - 2 minutes) as one 5 mL injection on Days 1, 15, 29, and once monthly thereafter. FASLODEX has not been evaluated in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C). Combination Therapy When FASLODEX is used in combination with palbociclib, abemaciclib, or ribociclib, refer to monotherapy dose modification instructions for FASLODEX.

Refer to the Full Prescribing Information of co-administered palbociclib, abemaciclib, or ribociclib for dose modification guidelines in the event of toxicities, for use with concomitant medications, and other relevant safety information.

Administration Technique Administer the injection according to the local guidelines for performing large volume intramuscular injections. NOTE: Due to the proximity of the underlying sciatic nerve, caution should be taken if administering FASLODEX at the dorsogluteal injection site. The proper method of administration of FASLODEX for intramuscular use is described in the following instructions.

For each single-dose prefilled syringe: 1. Remove glass syringe barrel from tray and check that it is not damaged. 2. Remove perforated patient record label from syringe. 3.

Inspect drug product in glass syringe for any visible particulate matter or discoloration prior to use. Discard if particulate matter or discoloration is present. 4. Peel open the safety needle (SafetyGlide™) outer packaging. 5.

Hold the syringe upright on the ribbed part (C). With the other hand, take hold of the cap (A) and carefully tilt cap back and forth (DO NOT TWIST CAP) until the cap disconnects for removal (see Figure 1). 6. Pull the cap (A) off in a straight upward direction.

DO NOT TOUCH THE STERILE SYRINGE TIP (Luer-Lok) (B) (see Figure 2). 1. Attach the safety needle to the syringe tip (Luer-Lok). Twist needle until firmly seated (see Figure 3).

Confirm that the needle is locked to the Luer connector before moving or tilting the syringe out of the vertical plane to avoid spillage of syringe contents. For Administration: 1. Pull shield straight off needle to avoid damaging needle point. 2.

Remove needle sheath. 3. Expel excess gas from the syringe (a small gas bubble may remain). 4. For user convenience, the needle ‘bevel up’ position is orientated to the lever arm, as shown in Figure 4. 1.

After injection, immediately activate the lever arm to deploy the needle shielding by applying a single-finger stroke to the activation assisted lever arm to push the lever arm completely forward. Listen for a click. Confirm that the needle shielding has completely covered the needle (see Figure 5).

NOTE: Activate away from self and others. 1. Discard the empty syringe into an approved sharps collector in accordance with applicable regulations and institutional policy. 2. Repeat steps 1 through 13 for second syringe.

How To Use FASLODEX For the 2 x 5 mL syringe package, the contents of both syringes must be injected to receive the 500 mg recommended dose. SAFETYGLIDE™ INSTRUCTIONS FROM BECTON DICKINSON SafetyGlide ™ is a trademark of Becton Dickinson and Company. Important Administration Information To help avoid HIV (AIDS), HBV (Hepatitis), and other infectious diseases due to accidental needlesticks, contaminated needles should not be recapped or removed, unless there is no alternative or that such action is required by a specific medical procedure.

Hands must remain behind the needle at all times during use and disposal. Do not autoclave SafetyGlide™ Needle before use. Becton Dickinson guarantees the contents of their unopened or undamaged packages to be sterile, non-toxic, and non-pyrogenic.

Side Effects of Faslodex

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, the adverse reaction rates observed cannot be directly compared to rates in other trials and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. Monotherapy Comparison of FASLODEX 500 mg and FASLODEX 250 mg (CONFIRM) The following adverse reactions (ARs) were calculated based on the safety analysis of CONFIRM comparing the administration of FASLODEX 500 mg intramuscularly once a month with FASLODEX 250 mg intramuscularly once a month. Table 1 lists adverse reactions reported with an incidence of 5% or greater, regardless of assessed causality, from CONFIRM.

Grade 3-4 increases were observed in 1-2% of patients. The incidence and severity of increased hepatic enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP) did not differ between the 250 mg and the 500 mg FASLODEX arms. The data described below reflect exposure to FASLODEX in 228 out of 460 patients with HR-positive advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women not previously treated with endocrine therapy who received at least one dose of treatment in FALCON.

Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation for those patients receiving FASLODEX included drug hypersensitivity (0.9%), injection site hypersensitivity (0.4%), and elevated liver enzymes (0.4%). The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) of any grade reported in patients in the FASLODEX arm were arthralgia, hot flash, fatigue, and nausea. Adverse reactions reported in patients who received FASLODEX in FALCON at an incidence of ≥5% in either treatment arm are listed in Table 2, and laboratory abnormalities are listed in Table 3.

The data described below reflect exposure to FASLODEX plus palbociclib in 345 out of 517 patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer who received at least 1 dose of treatment in PALOMA-3. The median duration of treatment for FASLODEX plus palbociclib was 10.8 months while the median duration of treatment for FASLODEX plus placebo arm was 4.8 months. No dose reduction was allowed for FASLODEX in PALOMA-3.

Dose reductions of palbociclib due to an adverse reaction of any grade occurred in 36% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus palbociclib. Adverse reactions leading to discontinuation for those patients receiving FASLODEX plus palbociclib included fatigue (0.6%), infections (0.6%), and thrombocytopenia (0.6%). The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) of any grade reported in patients in the FASLODEX plus palbociclib arm by descending frequency were neutropenia, leukopenia, infections, fatigue, nausea, anemia, stomatitis, diarrhea, thrombocytopenia, vomiting, alopecia, rash, decreased appetite, and pyrexia.

The most frequently reported Grade ≥3 adverse reactions (≥5%) in patients receiving FASLODEX plus palbociclib in descending frequency were neutropenia and leukopenia. Adverse reactions (≥10%) reported in patients who received FASLODEX plus palbociclib or FASLODEX plus placebo in PALOMA-3 are listed in Table 5, and laboratory abnormalities are listed in Table 6. Table 6: Laboratory Abnormalities in PALOMA-3 0 0 N=number of patients; WBC=white blood cells.

The data described below reflect exposure to FASLODEX in 664 patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who received at least one dose of FASLODEX plus abemaciclib or placebo in MONARCH 2. Median duration of treatment was 12 months for patients receiving FASLODEX plus abemaciclib and 8 months for patients receiving FASLODEX plus placebo. Dose reductions due to an adverse reaction occurred in 43% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus abemaciclib.

Adverse reactions leading to dose reductions ≥5% of patients were diarrhea and neutropenia. Abemaciclib dose reduction due to diarrhea of any grade occurred in 19% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus abemaciclib compared to 0.4% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus placebo. Abemaciclib dose reductions due to neutropenia of any grade occurred in 10% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus abemaciclib compared to no patients receiving FASLODEX plus placebo.

Permanent study treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event was reported in 9% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus abemaciclib and in 3% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus placebo. Deaths during treatment or during the 30-day follow up, regardless of causality, were reported in 18 cases (4%) of FASLODEX plus abemaciclib treated patients versus 10 cases (5%) of FASLODEX plus placebo treated patients. The most common adverse reactions reported (≥20%) in the FASLODEX plus abemaciclib arm were diarrhea, fatigue, neutropenia, nausea, infections, abdominal pain, anemia, leukopenia, decreased appetite, vomiting, and headache (Table 7).

The most frequently reported (≥5%) Grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions were neutropenia, diarrhea, leukopenia, anemia, and infections. Table 7: Adverse Reactions ≥10% of Patients Receiving FASLODEX Plus Abemaciclib and ≥2% Higher Than FASLODEX Plus Placebo in MONARCH 2 0 Additional adverse reactions in MONARCH 2 include venous thromboembolic events (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, subclavian vein thrombosis, axillary vein thrombosis, and DVT inferior vena cava), which were reported in 5% of patients treated with FASLODEX plus abemaciclib as compared to 0.9% of patients treated with FASLODEX plus placebo. The data described below reflect exposure to FASLODEX plus ribociclib in 483 out of 724 postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer for initial endocrine based therapy or after disease progression on endocrine therapy who received at least one dose of FASLODEX plus ribociclib or placebo in MONALEESA-3.

Median duration of treatment was 15.8 months for FASLODEX plus ribociclib and 12 months for FASLODEX plus placebo. Dose reductions due to adverse reactions occurred in 32% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus ribociclib and in 3% of patients receiving FASLODEX plus placebo. Among patients receiving FASLODEX plus ribociclib, 8% were reported to have permanently discontinued both FASLODEX plus ribociclib, and 9% were reported to have discontinued ribociclib alone due to ARs.

Among patients receiving FASLODEX plus placebo, 4% were reported to have permanently discontinued both FASLODEX and placebo and 2% were reported to have discontinued placebo alone due to ARs. The most common adverse reactions (reported at a frequency ≥20% on the FASLODEX plus ribociclib arm and ≥2% higher than FASLODEX plus placebo) were neutropenia, infections, leukopenia, cough, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, constipation, pruritus, and rash. Adverse reactions and laboratory abnormalities occurring in patients in MONALEESA-3 are listed in Table 9 and Table 10, respectively.

Table 10: Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in ≥ Postmarketing Experience The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of FASLODEX. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. For FASLODEX 250 mg, other adverse reactions reported as drug-related and seen infrequently (<1%) include thromboembolic phenomena, myalgia, vertigo, leukopenia, and hypersensitivity reactions, including angioedema and urticaria.

Vaginal bleeding has been reported infrequently (<1%), mainly in patients during the first 6 weeks after changing from existing hormonal therapy to treatment with FASLODEX. If bleeding persists, further evaluation should be considered. Elevation of bilirubin, elevation of gamma GT, hepatitis, and liver failure have been reported infrequently (<1%).

Table 1: Adverse Reactions in CONFIRM (≥5% in Either Treatment Group)
Adverse ReactionsFASLODEX 500 mg N=361 %FASLODEX 250 mg N=374 %
Body as a Whole
Injection Site Pain Including more severe injection site related sciatica, neuralgia, neuropathic pain, and peripheral neuropathy.129
Headache87
Back Pain811
Fatigue86
Pain in Extremity77
Asthenia66
Vascular System
Hot Flash76
Digestive System
Nausea1014
Vomiting66
Anorexia64
Constipation54
Musculoskeletal System
Bone Pain98
Arthralgia88
Musculoskeletal Pain63
Respiratory System
Cough55
Dyspnea45
Table 2: Adverse Reactions in FALCON
Adverse ReactionsFASLODEX 500 mg N=228Anastrozole 1 mg N=232
All Grades %Grade 3 or 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 or 4 %
Vascular Disorders
Hot flash110100
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Nausea11010<1
Diarrhea606<1
Musculoskeletal and Connective Tissue Disorders
Arthralgia170100
Myalgia7030
Pain in extremity6040
Back pain9<160
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions
Fatigue11<17<1
Table 3: Laboratory Abnormalities in FALCON In FALCON, post-baseline increases of ≥1 CTC grade in either AST, ALT, or alkaline phosphatase were observed in >10% of patients receiving FASLODEX. Grade 3-4 increases were observed in 1%-3% of patients.
Laboratory ParametersFASLODEX 500 mg N=228Anastrozole 1 mg N=232
All Grades %Grade 3 or 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 or 4 %
Alanine aminotransferase increased (ALT)7130
Aspartate aminotransferase increased (AST)513<1
Table 4: Adverse Reactions in Studies 0020 and 0021 (≥5% from Combined Data)
Adverse ReactionsFASLODEX 250 mg N=423 %Anastrozole 1 mg N=423 %
Body as a Whole6868
Asthenia2327
Pain1920
Headache1517
Back Pain1413
Abdominal Pain1212
Injection Site Pain Including more severe injection site related sciatica, neuralgia, neuropathic pain, and peripheral neuropathy. All patients on FASLODEX received injections, but only those anastrozole patients who were in Study 0021 received placebo injections.117
Pelvic Pain109
Chest Pain75
Flu Syndrome76
Fever66
Accidental Injury56
Cardiovascular System3028
Vasodilatation1817
Digestive System5248
Nausea2625
Vomiting1312
Constipation1311
Diarrhea1213
Anorexia911
Hemic and Lymphatic Systems1414
Anemia55
Metabolic and Nutritional Disorders1818
Peripheral Edema910
Musculoskeletal System2628
Bone Pain1614
Arthritis36
Nervous System3434
Dizziness77
Insomnia79
Paresthesia68
Depression67
Anxiety54
Respiratory System3934
Pharyngitis1612
Dyspnea1512
Cough Increased1010
Skin and Appendages2223
Rash78
Sweating55
Urogenital System1815
Urinary Tract Infection64
Table 5: Adverse Reactions (≥10%) in PALOMA-3
Adverse ReactionsFASLODEX plus Palbociclib N=345FASLODEX plus Placebo N=172
All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %
Infections and Infestations
Infections Infections includes all reported preferred terms (PTs) that are part of the System Organ Class Infections and infestations.47 Most common infections (≥1%) include: nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, influenza, bronchitis, rhinitis, conjunctivitis, pneumonia, sinusitis, cystitis, oral herpes, respiratory tract infection, gastroenteritis, tooth infection, pharyngitis, eye infection, herpes simplex, paronychia.313130
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders
Neutropenia835511410
Leukopenia53301511
Anemia30401320
Thrombocytopenia2321000
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
Decreased appetite1610810
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Nausea34002810
Stomatitis Stomatitis includes: aphthous stomatitis, cheilitis, glossitis, glossodynia, mouth ulceration, mucosal inflammation, oral pain, oropharyngeal discomfort, oropharyngeal pain, stomatitis.28101300
Diarrhea24001910
Vomiting19101510
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
Alopecia18 Grade 1 events – 17%; Grade 2 events – 1%.N/AN/A6 Grade 1 events – 6%.N/AN/A
Rash Rash includes: rash, rash maculo-papular, rash pruritic, rash erythematous, rash papular, dermatitis, dermatitis acneiform, toxic skin eruption.1710600
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions
Fatigue41202910
Pyrexia13<10500
Grading according to CTCAE v.4.0. CTCAE=Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; N=number of patients; N/A=not applicable.
Table 6: Laboratory Abnormalities in PALOMA-3
Laboratory ParametersFASLODEX plus Palbociclib N=345FASLODEX plus Placebo N=172
All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %
WBC decreased994512601
Neutrophils decreased9656111401
Anemia78304020
Platelets decreased62211000
Aspartate aminotransferase increased43404840
Alanine aminotransferase increased36203400
Table 7: Adverse Reactions ≥10% of Patients Receiving FASLODEX Plus Abemaciclib and ≥2% Higher Than FASLODEX Plus Placebo in MONARCH 2
Adverse ReactionsFASLODEX plus Abemaciclib N=441FASLODEX plus Placebo N=223
All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Diarrhea8613025<10
Nausea45302310
Abdominal pain Includes abdominal pain, abdominal pain upper, abdominal pain lower, abdominal discomfort, abdominal tenderness.35201610
Vomiting26<101020
Stomatitis15<101000
Infections and Infestations
Infections Includes upper respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, lung infection, pharyngitis, conjunctivitis, sinusitis, vaginal infection, sepsis.435<1253<1
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders
Neutropenia Includes neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased.4624341<1
Anemia Includes anemia, hematocrit decreased, hemoglobin decreased, red blood cell count decreased.297<1410
Leukopenia Includes leukopenia, white blood cell count decreased.289<1200
Thrombocytopenia Includes platelet count decreased, thrombocytopenia.162130<1
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions
Fatigue Includes asthenia, fatigue.463032<10
Edema peripheral1200700
Pyrexia11<1<16<10
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
Decreased appetite271012<10
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders
Cough13001100
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
Alopecia1600200
Pruritus1300600
Rash1110400
Nervous System Disorders
Headache201015<10
Dysgeusia1800300
Dizziness1210600
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased134<1520
Aspartate aminotransferase increased1220730
Creatinine increased12<10<100
Weight decreased10<102<10
Table 8: Laboratory Abnormalities ≥10% in Patients Receiving FASLODEX Plus Abemaciclib and ≥2% Higher Than FASLODEX Plus Placebo in MONARCH 2
Laboratory ParametersFulvestrant plus Abemaciclib N=441Fulvestrant plus Placebo N=223
All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %
Creatinine increased98107400
White blood cell decreased9023<133<10
Neutrophil count decreased87294304<1
Anemia843033<10
Lymphocyte count decreased6312<13220
Platelet count decreased53<111500
Alanine aminotransferase increased414<13210
Aspartate aminotransferase increased3740254<1
Table 9: Adverse Reactions Occurring in ≥10% and ≥2% higher than FASLODEX plus Placebo Arm in MONALEESA-3 (All Grades)
Adverse ReactionsFASLODEX plus Ribociclib N=483FASLODEX plus Placebo N=241
All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %
Infections and Infestations
Infections Infections; urinary tract infections; respiratory tract infections; gastroenteritis; sepsis (<1%).42503020
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders
Neutropenia69467200
Leukopenia2712<1<100
Anemia1730520
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
Decreased appetite16<101300
Nervous System Disorders
Dizziness13<10800
Respiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders
Cough22001500
Dyspnea151<11220
Gastrointestinal Disorders
Nausea451028<10
Diarrhea29<1020<10
Vomiting27101300
Constipation25<101200
Abdominal pain171013<10
Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
Alopecia1900500
Pruritus20<10700
Rash23<10700
General Disorders and Administration Site Conditions
Edema peripheral1500700
Pyrexia11<10700
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased15725<10
Aspartate aminotransferase increased13515<10
Grading according to CTCAE 4.03. CTCAE=Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; N=number of patients
Table 10: Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in ≥10% of Patients in MONALEESA-3
Laboratory parametersFASLODEX plus Ribociclib N=483FASLODEX plus Placebo N=241
All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %All Grades %Grade 3 %Grade 4 %
Hematology
Leukocyte count decreased9525<126<10
Neutrophil count decreased9246721<10
Hemoglobin decreased60403530
Lymphocyte count decreased69141354<1
Platelet count decreased33<111100
Chemistry
Creatinine increased65<1<133<10
Gamma-glutamyl transferase increased52614982
Aspartate aminotransferase increased49524330
Alanine aminotransferase increased44833720
Glucose serum decreased23001800
Phosphorous decreased18508<10
Albumin decreased1200800

Warnings & Cautions for Faslodex

Risk of Bleeding Because FASLODEX is administered intramuscularly, it should be used with caution in patients with bleeding diatheses, thrombocytopenia, or anticoagulant use.

Increased Exposure in Patients with Hepatic Impairment

The safety and pharmacokinetics of FASLODEX were evaluated in a study in seven subjects with moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class B) and seven subjects with normal hepatic function. Exposure was increased in patients with moderate hepatic impairment, therefore, a dose of 250 mg is recommended. FASLODEX has not been studied in patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C).

Injection Site Reaction

Injection site related events including sciatica, neuralgia, neuropathic pain, and peripheral neuropathy have been reported with FASLODEX injection. Caution should be taken while administering FASLODEX at the dorsogluteal injection site due to the proximity of the underlying sciatic nerve.

Embryo-Fetal Toxicity Based on findings from animal studies and its mechanism of action, FASLODEX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. In animal reproduction studies, administration of fulvestrant to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis resulted in embryo-fetal toxicity at daily doses that are significantly less than the maximum recommended human dose. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.

Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with FASLODEX and for one year after the last dose.

Immunoassay Measurement of Serum Estradiol Due to structural similarity of fulvestrant and estradiol, FASLODEX can interfere with estradiol measurement by immunoassay, resulting in falsely elevated estradiol levels.

Drug Interactions with Faslodex

  • There are no known drug-drug interactions. Although, fulvestrant is metabolized by CYP 3A4 in vitro, drug interactions studies with ketoconazole or rifampin did not alter fulvestrant pharmacokinetics. Dose adjustment is not needed in patients co-prescribed CYP 3A4 inhibitors or inducers.
  • There are no known drug-drug interactions.

Pregnancy Safety for Faslodex

Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on findings from animal studies and its mechanism of action, FASLODEX can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. There are no available data in pregnant women to inform the drug-associated risk. In animal reproduction studies, administration of fulvestrant to pregnant rats and rabbits during organogenesis caused embryo-fetal toxicity, including skeletal malformations and fetal loss, at daily doses that were 6% and 30% of the maximum recommended human dose based on mg/m 2, respectively.

Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively.

Data Animal Data Administration of fulvestrant to rats prior to and up to implantation caused embryonic loss at daily doses that were 0.6% of the daily maximum recommended human dose based on mg/m 2. When fulvestrant was administered to pregnant rats during the period of organogenesis, intramuscular doses ≥0.1 mg/kg/day (6% of the human recommended dose based on mg/m 2 ) caused effects on embryo-fetal development consistent with its antiestrogenic activity. Fulvestrant caused an increased incidence of fetal abnormalities in rats (tarsal flexure of the hind paw at 2 mg/kg/day; equivalent to the human dose based on mg/m 2 ) and non-ossification of the odontoid and ventral tubercle of the first cervical vertebra at doses ≥0.1 mg/kg/day.

Fulvestrant administered at 2 mg/kg/day caused fetal loss. Further, at 0.25 mg/kg/day (30% the human dose based on mg/m 2 ), fulvestrant caused increases in placental weight and post-implantation loss in rabbits. Fulvestrant was associated with an increased incidence of fetal variations in rabbits (backwards displacement of the pelvic girdle, and 27 pre-sacral vertebrae at 0.25 mg/kg/day; 30% the human dose based on mg/m 2 ) when administered during the period of organogenesis.

Pediatric Use of Faslodex

Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established. A multi-center, single-arm, open-label, study of fulvestrant was conducted in 30 girls with McCune-Albright Syndrome (MAS) associated with Progressive Precocious Puberty (PPP). The median age at informed consent was 6 years old (range: 1 to 8).

The first 10 patients initially received fulvestrant 2 mg/kg. Baseline measurements for vaginal bleeding days, bone age, growth velocity, and Tanner staging for at least 6 months prior to study entry were provided retrospectively by the parent, guardian, or local consultant. All measurements during the study period were collected prospectively.

Patients’ baseline characteristics included the following: a mean ± SD chronological age of 5.9 ± 1.8 years; a mean rate of bone age advancement (change in bone age in years divided by change in chronological age in years) of 2.0 ± 1.03; and a mean growth velocity z-score of 2.4 ± 3.26. Twenty-nine of 30 patients completed the 12-month study period. The following results were observed: of the 23 patients with baseline vaginal bleeding experienced a complete cessation of vaginal bleeding on-treatment (month 0 to 12); a reduction in the rate of bone age advancement during the 12-month study period compared to baseline (mean change=-0.9 ); and a reduction in mean growth velocity Z-score on-treatment compared to baseline (mean change=-1.1 ).

There were no clinically meaningful changes in median Tanner stage (breast or pubic), mean uterine volume, or mean ovarian volume, or predicted adult height (PAH) on-treatment compared to baseline. The effect of FASLODEX on bone mineral density in children has not been studied and is not known. Eight patients (27%) experienced adverse reactions that were considered possibly related to FASLODEX.

These included injection site reactions (inflammation, pain, hematoma, pruritus, rash), abdominal pain, contusion, tachycardia, hot flash, extremity pain, and vomiting. Nine (30%) patients reported an SAE, none of which were considered related to FASLODEX. No patients discontinued study treatment due to an AE and no patients died.

Pharmacokinetics The pharmacokinetics of fulvestrant was characterized using a population pharmacokinetic analysis with sparse samples per patient obtained from 30 female pediatric patients aged 1 to 8 years with PPP associated with MAS. Pharmacokinetic data from 294 postmenopausal women with breast cancer who received 125 or 250 mg monthly dosing regimen were also included in the analysis. In these pediatric patients receiving 4 mg/kg monthly intramuscular dose of fulvestrant, the geometric mean (SD) CL/F was 444 mL/min which was 32% lower than adults.

The geometric mean (SD) steady state trough concentration (C min,ss ) and AUC ss was 4.19 ng/mL and 3680 ng*hr/mL, respectively.

Contraindications for Faslodex

  • FASLODEX is contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to the drug or to any of its components. Hypersensitivity reactions, including urticaria and angioedema, have been reported in association with FASLODEX.
  • Hypersensitivity.

Overdosage Information for Faslodex

Human experience of overdose with FASLODEX is limited. There are isolated reports of overdose with FASLODEX in humans. No adverse reactions were seen in healthy male and female volunteers who received intravenous fulvestrant, which resulted in peak plasma concentrations at the end of the infusion, that were approximately 10 to 15 times those seen after intramuscular injection.

The potential toxicity of fulvestrant at these or higher concentrations in cancer patients who may have additional comorbidities is unknown. There is no specific treatment in the event of fulvestrant overdose, and symptoms of overdose are not established. In the event of an overdose, healthcare practitioners should follow general supportive measures and should treat symptomatically.

Clinical Studies of Faslodex

The efficacy of FASLODEX 500 mg versus FASLODEX 250 mg was compared in CONFIRM. The efficacy of FASLODEX 500 mg was compared to 1 mg anastrozole in FALCON. The efficacy of FASLODEX 500 mg in combination with palbociclib 125 mg was compared to FASLODEX 500 mg plus placebo in PALOMA-3.

The efficacy of FASLODEX 500 mg in combination with ribociclib 600 mg was compared to FASLODEX 500 mg plus placebo in MONALEESA-3. Monotherapy Comparison of FASLODEX 500 mg and FASLODEX 250 mg (CONFIRM) A randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial (CONFIRM, NCT00099437) was completed in 736 postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had disease recurrence on or after adjuvant endocrine therapy or progression following endocrine therapy for advanced disease. This trial compared the efficacy and safety of FASLODEX 500 mg (n=362) with FASLODEX 250 mg (n=374).

The median age of study participants was 61 years. All patients had ER+ advanced breast cancer. Approximately 30% of subjects had no measurable disease.

Approximately 55% of patients had visceral disease. Results of CONFIRM are summarized in Table 12. The efficacy of FASLODEX 500 mg was compared to that of FASLODEX 250 mg.

Figure 6 shows a Kaplan-Meier plot of the Progression Free Survival (PFS) data after a minimum follow-up duration of 18 months demonstrating statistically significant superiority of FASLODEX 500 mg vs. FASLODEX 250 mg. In the initial Overall Survival (OS) analysis after a minimum follow-up duration of 18 months, there was no statistically significant difference in OS between the two treatment groups.

After a minimum follow-up duration of 50 months, an updated OS analysis was performed. Figure 7 shows a Kaplan-Meier plot of the updated OS data. Table 12: Efficacy Results in CONFIRM (Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population) Figure 6 Kaplan-Meier PFS: CONFIRM ITT Population Figure 7 Kaplan-Meier OS (Minimum Follow-up Duration of 50 Months): CONFIRM ITT Population Comparison of FASLODEX 500 mg and Anastrozole 1 mg (FALCON) A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multi-center study (FALCON, NCT01602380) of FASLODEX 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg was conducted in postmenopausal women with ER-positive and/or PgR-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer who had not previously been treated with any hormonal therapy.

This study compared the efficacy and safety of FASLODEX 500 mg and anastrozole 1 mg. Randomization was stratified by disease setting (locally advanced or metastatic), use of prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, and presence or absence of measurable disease. The major efficacy outcome measure of the study was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) evaluated according to RECIST v.1.1 (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors).

Key secondary efficacy outcome measures included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and duration of response (DoR). Patients enrolled in this study had a median age of 63 years (range 36-90). The majority of patients (87%) had metastatic disease at baseline.

Fifty-five percent (55%) of patients had visceral metastasis at baseline. A total of 17% of patients had received one prior chemotherapy regimen for advanced disease; 84% of patients had measurable disease. The efficacy results of FALCON are presented in Table 13 and Figure 8.

Table 13: Efficacy Results in FALCON (Investigator Assessment, ITT Population) (Investigator Assessment, ITT Population) ─ FALCON Comparison of FASLODEX 250 mg and Anastrozole 1 mg in Combined Data (Studies 0020 and 0021) Efficacy of FASLODEX was established by comparison to the selective aromatase inhibitor anastrozole in two randomized, controlled clinical trials (one conducted in North America, Study 0021, NCT00635713; the other predominantly in Europe, Study 0020) in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. All patients had progressed after previous therapy with an antiestrogen or progestin for breast cancer in the adjuvant or advanced disease setting. The median age of study participants was 64 years. 81.6% of patients had ER+ and/or PgR+ tumors.

Patients with ER-/PgR- or unknown tumors were required to have demonstrated a prior response to endocrine therapy. In both trials, eligible patients with measurable and/or evaluable disease were randomized to receive either FASLODEX 250 mg intramuscularly once a month (28 days + 3 days) or anastrozole 1 mg orally once a day. All patients were assessed monthly for the first three months and every three months thereafter.

Study 0021 was a double-blind, randomized trial in 400 postmenopausal women. Study 0020 was an open-label, randomized trial conducted in 451 postmenopausal women. In both trials, patients were initially randomized to a 125 mg per month dose as well, but interim analysis showed a very low response rate, and low dose groups were dropped.

Results of the trials, after a minimum follow-up duration of 14.6 months, are summarized in Table 14. The effectiveness of FASLODEX 250 mg was determined by comparing Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Time to Progression (TTP) results to anastrozole 1 mg, the active control. The two studies ruled out (by one-sided 97.7% confidence limit) inferiority of FASLODEX to anastrozole of 6.3% and 1.4% in terms of ORR.

Table 14: Efficacy Results in Studies 0020 and 0021 (Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Time to Progression (TTP)) 0.98 0.97 Combination Therapy Patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer who have had disease progression on or after prior adjuvant or metastatic endocrine therapy FASLODEX 500 mg in Combination with Palbociclib 125 mg (PALOMA-3) PALOMA-3 (NCT-1942135) was an international, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multi-center study of FASLODEX plus palbociclib versus FASLODEX plus placebo conducted in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, regardless of their menopausal status, whose disease progressed on or after prior endocrine therapy. A total of 521 pre/postmenopausal women were randomized 2:1 to FASLODEX plus palbociclib or FASLODEX plus placebo and stratified by documented sensitivity to prior hormonal therapy, menopausal status at study entry (pre/peri versus postmenopausal), and presence of visceral metastases. Palbociclib was given orally at a dose of 125 mg daily for 21 consecutive days followed by 7 days off treatment.

Pre/perimenopausal women were enrolled in the study and received the LHRH agonist goserelin for at least 4 weeks prior to and for the duration of PALOMA-3. Patients continued to receive assigned treatment until objective disease progression, symptomatic deterioration, unacceptable toxicity, death, or withdrawal of consent, whichever occurred first. Patients enrolled in this study had a median age of 57 years (range 29 to 88).

All patients had received prior systemic therapy and 75% of patients had received a previous chemotherapy regimen. Twenty-five percent of patients had received no prior therapy in the metastatic disease setting, 60% had visceral metastases, and 23% had bone only disease. The results from the investigator-assessed PFS and final OS data from PALOMA-3 are summarized in Table 15.

The relevant Kaplan-Meier plots are shown in Figures 9 and 10, respectively. Consistent PFS results were observed across patient subgroups of disease site, sensitivity to prior hormonal therapy, and menopausal status. After a median follow-up time of 45 months, the final OS results were not statistically significant.

Table 15: Efficacy Results in PALOMA-3 (Investigator Assessment, ITT Population) 0.814, p=0.0857 Not statistically significant at the pre-specified 2-sided alpha level of 0.047. 2-sided p-value from the log-rank test stratified by the presence of visceral metastases and sensitivity to prior endocrine therapy per randomization. Figure 9 Kaplan-Meier Plot of Progression-Free Survival (Investigator Assessment, ITT Population) – PALOMA-3 Figure 10 Kaplan-Meier Plot of Overall Survival (ITT Population) ─ PALOMA-3 FASLODEX 500 mg in Combination with Abemaciclib 150 mg (MONARCH 2) MONARCH 2 (NCT02107703) was a randomized, placebo-controlled, multi-center study conducted in women with HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with disease progression following endocrine therapy treated with FASLODEX plus abemaciclib versus FASLODEX plus placebo. Randomization was stratified by disease site (visceral, bone only, or other) and by sensitivity to prior endocrine therapy (primary or secondary resistance).

Pre/perimenopausal women were enrolled in the study and received the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist goserelin for at least 4 weeks prior to and for the duration of MONARCH 2. Patients remained on continuous treatment until development of progressive disease or unmanageable toxicity. Twenty percent (20%) of patients had de novo metastatic disease, 27% had bone only disease, and 56% had visceral disease.

Twenty-five percent (25%) of patients had primary endocrine therapy resistance. Seventeen percent (17%) of patients were pre- or perimenopausal. PFS assessment based on a blinded independent radiologic review was consistent with the investigator assessment.

Consistent results were observed across patient stratification subgroups of disease site and endocrine therapy resistance for PFS and OS. Table 16: Efficacy Results in MONARCH 2 (Intent-to-Treat Population) (MONARCH 2) Figure 12 Kaplan-Meier Curves of Overall Survival: FASLODEX plus Abemaciclib versus FASLODEX plus Placebo (MONARCH 2) Postmenopausal women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer for initial endocrine based therapy or after disease progression on endocrine therapy FASLODEX 500 mg in Combination with Ribociclib 600 mg (MONALEESA-3) MONALEESA-3 (NCT 02422615) was a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of FASLODEX plus ribociclib versus FASLODEX plus placebo conducted in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer who have received no or only one line of prior endocrine treatment. A total of 726 patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive FASLODEX plus ribociclib or FASLODEX plus placebo and stratified according to the presence of liver and/or lung metastases and prior endocrine therapy for advanced or metastatic disease.

The major efficacy outcome measure for the study was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. Patients enrolled in this study had a median age of 63 years (range 31 to 89). The patients enrolled were primarily Caucasian (85%), Asian (9%), and Black (0.7%).

Nearly all patients (99.7%) had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. First- and second-line patients were enrolled in this study (of which 19% had de novo metastatic disease). Forty-three percent (43%) of patients had received chemotherapy in the adjuvant vs. 13% in the neoadjuvant setting and 59% had received endocrine therapy in the adjuvant vs. 1% in the neoadjuvant setting prior to study entry.

Twenty-one percent (21%) of patients had bone-only disease and 61% had visceral disease. Demographics and baseline disease characteristics were balanced and comparable between study arms. The efficacy results from MONALEESA-3 are summarized in Table 17, Figure 13, and Figure 14.

Consistent results were observed in stratification factor subgroups of disease site and prior endocrine treatment for advanced disease.

Table 12: Efficacy Results in CONFIRM (Intent-To-Treat (ITT) Population)
EndpointFASLODEX 500 mg (N=362)FASLODEX 250 mg (N=374)
PFS PFS (Progression Free Survival)=the time between randomization and the earliest of progression or death from any cause. Minimum follow-up duration of 18 months. Median (months)6.55.4
Hazard Ratio Hazard Ratio <1 favors FASLODEX 500 mg. (95% CI CI=Confidence Interval )0.80 (0.68-0.94)
p-value0.006
OS OS=Overall Survival Updated Analysis Minimum follow up duration of 50 months. (% patients who died)261 (72.1%)293 (78.3%)
Median OS (months)26.422.3
Hazard Ratio (95% CI ) Not statistically significant as no adjustments were made for multiplicity.0.81 (0.69-0.96)
ORR ORR (Objective Response Rate), as defined as number (%) of patients with complete response or partial response, was analyzed in the evaluable patients with measurable disease at baseline (fulvestrant 500 mg N=240; fulvestrant 250 mg N=261). Minimum follow-up duration of 18 months. (95% CI )13.8% (9.7%, 18.8%) (33/240)14.6% (10.5%, 19.4%) (38/261)
Table 13: Efficacy Results in FALCON (Investigator Assessment, ITT Population)
FASLODEX 500 mg N=230Anastrozole 1 mg N=232
Progression-Free Survival
Number of PFS Events (%)143 (62.2%)166 (71.6%)
Median PFS (months)16.613.8
PFS Hazard Ratio (95% CI)0.797 (0.637 - 0.999)
p-value0.049
Overall Survival Interim OS analysis with 61% of total number of events required for the final OS analysis.
Number of OS Events67 (29.1%)75 (32.3%)
Median OS (months)NRNR
OS Hazard Ratio (95% CI)0.874 (0.629 – 1.216)
Objective Response for Patients with Measurable DiseaseN=193N=196
Objective Response Rate (%, 95% CI)46.1% (38.9%, 53.4%)44.9% (37.8%, 52.1%)
Median DoR (months)20.013.2
NR: Not reached
Table 14: Efficacy Results in Studies 0020 and 0021 (Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Time to Progression (TTP))
Study 0021 (Double-Blind)Study 0020 (Open-Label)
EndpointFASLODEX 250 mg N=206Anastrozole 1 mg N=194FASLODEX 250 mg N=222Anastrozole 1 mg N=229
Objective Tumor Response Number (%) of subjects with CR CR=Complete Response + PR PR=Partial Response35 (17.0)33 (17.0)45 (20.3)34 (14.9)
% Difference in Tumor Response Rate (FAS FAS=FASLODEX -ANA ANA=anastrozole ) 2-sided 95.4% CI CI=Confidence Interval0.0 (-6.3, 8.9)5.4 (-1.4, 14.8)
Time to Progression (TTP) Median TTP (days)165103166156
Hazard Ratio Hazard Ratio <1 favors FASLODEX 2-sided 95.4% CI0.9 (0.7, 1.1)1.0 (0.8, 1.2)
Stable Disease for ≥24 weeks (%)26.719.124.330.1
Overall Survival (OS)
Died n (%) Median Survival (days)152 (73.8%) 844149 (76.8%) 913167 (75.2%) 803173 (75.5%) 736
Hazard Ratio (2-sided 95% CI)0.98 (0.78, 1.24)0.97 (0.78, 1.21)
Table 15: Efficacy Results in PALOMA-3 (Investigator Assessment, ITT Population)
FASLODEX plus PalbociclibFASLODEX plus Placebo
Progression-Free Survival for ITTN=347N=174
Number of PFS Events (%)145 (41.8%)114 (65.5%)
Median PFS (months) (95% CI)9.5 (9.2-11.0)4.6 (3.5-5.6)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) and p-value0.461 (0.360-0.591) p <0.0001
Objective Response for Patients with Measurable DiseaseN=267N=138
Objective response rate Responses are based on confirmed responses. (%, 95% CI)24.6 (19.6-30.2)10.9 (6.2-17.3)
Overall Survival for ITT populationN=347N=174
Number of OS events (%)201 (57.9)109 (62.6)
Median OS (months) (95% CI)34.9 (28.8, 40.0)28.0 (23.6, 34.6)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI) and p-value0.814 (0.644, 1.029), p=0.0857 Not statistically significant at the pre-specified 2-sided alpha level of 0.047. 2-sided p-value from the log-rank test stratified by the presence of visceral metastases and sensitivity to prior endocrine therapy per randomization.
N=number of patients; PFS=progression-free survival; CI=confidence interval; ITT=Intent-to-Treat; OS=overall survival.
Table 16: Efficacy Results in MONARCH 2 (Intent-to-Treat Population)
FASLODEX plus AbemaciclibFASLODEX plus Placebo
Progression-Free Survival (Investigator Assessment)N=446N=223
Number of patients with an event (n, %)222 (49.8)157 (70.4)
Median (months, 95% CI)16.4 (14.4, 19.3)9.3 (7.4, 12.7)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)0.553 (0.449, 0.681)
p-value Stratified by disease site (visceral metastases vs. bone-only metastases vs. other) and endocrine therapy resistance (primary resistance vs. secondary resistance)p<0.0001
Overall Survival Data from a pre-specified interim analysis (77% of the number of events needed for the planned final analysis) with the p-value compared with the allocated alpha of 0.021.
Number of deaths (n, %)211 (47.3)127 (57.0)
Median OS in months (95% CI)46.7 (39.2, 52.2)37.3 (34.4, 43.2)
Hazard ratio (95% CI)10.757 (0.606, 0.945)
p-valuep=0.0137
Objective Response for Patients with Measurable DiseaseN=318N=164
Objective response rate Complete response + partial response. (n, %)153 (48.1)35 (21.3)
95% CI42.6, 53.615.1, 27.6
Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval, OS=overall survival.
Table 17: Efficacy Results – MONALEESA-3 (Investigator Assessment, Intent-to-Treat Population)
FASLODEX plus RibociclibFASLODEX plus Placebo
Progression-free survival Investigator AssessmentN=484N=242
Events (n, %)210 (43.4%)151 (62.4%)
Median (months, 95% CI)20.5 (18.5, 23.5)12.8 (10.9, 16.3)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)0.593 (0.480 to 0.732)
p-value p-value is obtained from the one-sided log-rank<0.0001
Overall SurvivalN=484N=242
Events (n, %)167 (34.5%)108 (44.6%)
Median (months, 95% CI)NR (42.5, NR)40.0 (37.0, NR)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)0.724 (0.568, 0.924)
p-value0.00455
Overall Response Rate Based on confirmed responsesN=379N=181
Patients with measurable disease (95% CI)40.9 (35.9, 45.8)28.7 (22.1, 35.3)
Abbreviation: NR, not reached

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Faslodex?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Faslodex Prices