Eylea Hd Drug Information
Generic name: AFLIBERCEPT
Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitor [EPC]
Uses of Eylea Hd
Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular
Degeneration (nAMD)
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR)
Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)
Dosage & Administration of Eylea Hd
Important Injection Instructions
For ophthalmic intravitreal injection. EYLEA HD must only be administered by a qualified physician. A 5-micron sterile filter needle (18-gauge × 1½-inch), a 1-mL Luer lock syringe and a 30-gauge × ½-inch sterile injection needle are needed.
These patients may benefit from resuming every 4-week dosing (approximately every 28 days +/- 7 days). Some patients did not maintain a response with extended dosing intervals after successful response to the first three to five initial monthly doses.
Preparation for Administration The EYLEA
HD glass vial is for one-time use in one eye only. Discard unused portion. EYLEA HD does not contain an anti-microbial preservative.
Extraction of multiple doses from a single vial may increase the risk of contamination and subsequent infection. Do not use if the package or its components are expired, damaged, or have been tampered with. Check the label on the vial to make sure you have the correct aflibercept strength.
Prepare for intravitreal injection with the following medical devices for single use. a 5-micron sterile filter needle (18-gauge × 1½-inch) a 1-mL sterile Luer lock syringe (with marking to measure 0.07 mL) a sterile injection needle (30-gauge × ½-inch) 1. Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration, whenever solution and container permit. Do not use the vial if particulates, cloudiness, or discoloration are visible. 2.
Remove the protective plastic cap from the vial (see Figure 1 ). Figure 1: 3. Clean the top of the vial with an alcohol wipe (see Figure 2 ).
Figure 2: 4. Use aseptic technique to carry out steps 4 – 11. Remove the 18-gauge × 1½-inch, 5-micron, filter needle and the 1-mL syringe from their packaging.
Attach the filter needle to the syringe by twisting it onto the Luer lock syringe tip (see Figure 3 ). Figure 3: 5. Push the filter needle into the center of the vial stopper until the needle is completely inserted into the vial and the tip touches the bottom or bottom edge of the vial. 6.
Withdraw all of the EYLEA HD vial contents into the syringe, keeping the vial in an upright position, slightly inclined to ease complete withdrawal. To deter the introduction of air, ensure the bevel of the filter needle is submerged into the liquid. Continue to tilt the vial during withdrawal keeping the bevel of the filter needle submerged in the liquid (see Figure 4a and Figure 4b ).
Figure 4a: Figure 4b: 7. Ensure that the plunger rod is drawn sufficiently back when emptying the vial in order to completely empty the filter needle. 8. Remove the filter needle from the syringe and properly dispose of the filter needle.
Note: Filter needle is not to be used for intravitreal injection. 9. Remove the 30-gauge × ½-inch injection needle from its packaging and attach the injection needle to the syringe by firmly twisting the injection needle onto the Luer lock syringe tip (see Figure 5 ). Figure 5: 10.
Holding the syringe with the needle pointing up, check the syringe for bubbles. If there are bubbles, gently tap the syringe with your finger until the bubbles rise to the top (see Figure 6 ). Figure 6: 11.
To eliminate all of the bubbles and to expel excess drug, SLOWLY depress the plunger so that the plunger tip aligns with the line that marks 0.07 mL on the syringe (see Figure 7a and Figure 7b ). Figure 7a: Figure 7b: Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 4a Figure 4b Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7a Figure 7b
Injection Procedure
The intravitreal injection procedure should be carried out under controlled aseptic conditions, which include surgical hand disinfection and the use of sterile gloves, a sterile drape, and a sterile eyelid speculum (or equivalent). Adequate anesthesia and a topical broad–spectrum microbicide should be given prior to the injection. Immediately following the intravitreal injection, patients should be monitored for elevation in intraocular pressure.
Appropriate monitoring may consist of a check for perfusion of the optic nerve head or tonometry. If required, a sterile paracentesis needle should be available. Following intravitreal injection, patients and/or caregivers should be instructed to report any signs and/or symptoms suggestive of endophthalmitis or retinal detachment (e.g., eye pain, redness of the eye, photophobia, blurring of vision) without delay.
Each vial should only be used for the treatment of a single eye. If the contralateral eye requires treatment, a new vial should be used and the sterile field (including a new syringe, gloves, drapes, eyelid speculum, filter and injection needles) should be changed before EYLEA HD is administered to the other eye. After injection, discard any unused product or waste material in accordance with local regulations.
| Figure 4a: | Figure 4b: |
|---|---|
| Figure 7a: | Figure 7b: |
|---|---|
Side Effects of Eylea Hd
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in other clinical trials of the same or another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. A total of 1755 patients were treated with EYLEA HD and 804 patients were treated with EYLEA 2 mg in three clinical studies. The most common adverse reactions reported in ≥3% of patients treated with EYLEA HD were cataract, conjunctival hemorrhage, corneal epithelium defect, intraocular pressure increased, ocular discomfort/eye pain/eye irritation, retinal hemorrhage, vision blurred, vitreous detachment and vitreous floaters.
Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) and Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) The data described below reflect exposure to EYLEA HD administered every 12 weeks (HDq12), EYLEA HD administered every 16 weeks (HDq16), or EYLEA 2 mg administered every 8 weeks (2q8) in controlled clinical studies 0 0 0 Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported in <1% of participants treated with EYLEA HD were lacrimation increased, eyelid edema, hypersensitivity (includes adverse events of rash, urticaria, pruritus), and injection site hemorrhage. Table 2: Most Common Adverse Reactions (≥1%) in at least one group in the QUASAR study of the patients treated with EYLEA HD in the RVO study were foreign body sensation in eyes (includes foreign body sensation in eyes and sensation of foreign body), ocular hyperaemia (includes conjunctival hyperemia, conjunctival irritation, ocular hyperemia), retinal hemorrhage, retinal pigment epithelial detachment (includes detachment of retinal pigment epithelium), retinal pigment epithelial tear/epitheliopathy (includes retinal pigment epitheliopathy), and retinal tear.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been identified during postapproval use of aflibercept. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Scleritis.
| Adverse Reactions | PULSAR | PHOTON | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EYLEA HDq12 | EYLEA HDq16 | EYLEA 2q8 | EYLEA HDq12 | EYLEA HDq16 | EYLEA 2q8 | |
| n=335 | n=338 | n=336 | n=328 | n=163 | n=167 | |
| Cataract Represents grouping of related terms | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 13% | 7% |
| Vision blurred | 9% | 9% | 8% | 5% | 4% | 6% |
| Intraocular pressure increased | 5% | 4% | 3% | 4% | 1% | 5% |
| Conjunctival hemorrhage | 3% | 3% | 3% | 5% | 5% | 4% |
| Ocular discomfort/eye pain/eye irritation | 3% | 4% | 4% | 5% | 4% | 4% |
| Vitreous floaters | 2% | 6% | 5% | 6% | 4% | 4% |
| Vitreous detachment | 2% | 4% | 2% | 5% | 3% | 4% |
| Corneal epithelium defect | 3% | 3% | 4% | 4% | 9% | 2% |
| Retinal hemorrhage | 5% | 6% | 6% | 0 | 4% | 1% |
| Dry eye | 3% | 3% | 5% | 2% | 4% | 2% |
| Intraocular inflammation | 2% | 1% | 2% | 2% | 1% | 1% |
| Retinal pigment epithelial tear/epitheliopathy | 2% | 2% | 2% | 1% | 0 | 0 |
| Vitreous hemorrhage | <1% | 1% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 2% |
| Retinal Detachment | 1% | 1% | <1% | <1% | 1% | 0 |
| Foreign body sensation in eyes | 1% | 2% | 2% | <1% | 1% | 0 |
| Ocular hyperemia | 1% | <1% | 1% | <1% | 0 | 0 |
| Retinal pigment epithelial detachment | 1% | 1% | 3% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Adverse Reactions | EYLEA HDq8 following 3 initial doses (HDq4) (N=293) | EYLEA HDq8 following 5 initial doses (HDq4) (N=298) | EYLEA 2q4 (N=301) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intraocular pressure increased Represents grouping of related terms | 7% | 6% | 3% |
| Vision blurred | 5% | 3% | 2% |
| Conjunctival hemorrhage | 3% | 2% | 2% |
| Ocular discomfort/eye pain/eye irritation | 3% | 3% | 1% |
| Vitreous detachment | 3% | 3% | 1% |
| Cataract | 2% | 4% | 3% |
| Corneal epithelium defect | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| Dry eye | 2% | 2% | 2% |
| Vitreous floaters | 1% | 1% | 1% |
| Intraocular inflammation | 1% | <1% | 1% |
| Vitreous hemorrhage | 1% | 1% | 0 |
| Hypersensitivity Represents reported non-ocular adverse events of hypersensitivity, rash, urticaria and pruritus | 1% | 1% | 1% |
Warnings & Cautions for Eylea Hd
Endophthalmitis, Retinal Detachments, and Retinal Vasculitis with or without Occlusion Intravitreal injections including those with aflibercept have been associated with endophthalmitis and retinal detachments and, more rarely, retinal vasculitis with or without occlusion. Proper aseptic injection technique must always be used when administering EYLEA HD. Patients and/or caregivers should be instructed to report any signs and/or symptoms suggestive of endophthalmitis, retinal detachment, or retinal vasculitis without delay and should be managed appropriately.
Increase in Intraocular Pressure
Acute increases in intraocular pressure have been seen within 60 minutes of intravitreal injection, including with EYLEA HD. Sustained increases in intraocular pressure have also been reported after repeated intravitreal dosing with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors. Intraocular pressure and the perfusion of the optic nerve head should be monitored and managed appropriately.
Thromboembolic Events There is a potential risk of arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) following intravitreal use of VEGF inhibitors, including EYLEA HD. ATEs are defined as nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or vascular death (including deaths of unknown cause).
Pregnancy Safety for Eylea Hd
Pregnancy Risk Summary Adequate and well-controlled studies with EYLEA HD have not been conducted in pregnant women. Aflibercept produced adverse embryofetal effects in rabbits, including external, visceral, and skeletal malformations. A fetal No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) was not identified.
At the lowest dose shown to produce adverse embryofetal effects, systemic exposure (based on AUC for free aflibercept) was approximately 0.9 -fold of the population pharmacokinetic estimated exposure in humans after an intravitreal dose of 8 mg (see Data ). Animal reproduction studies are not always predictive of human response, and it is not known whether EYLEA HD can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Based on the anti-VEGF mechanism of action for aflibercept, treatment with EYLEA HD may pose a risk to human embryofetal development.
EYLEA HD should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown.
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. Data Animal Data In two embryofetal development studies, aflibercept produced adverse embryofetal effects when administered every three days during organogenesis to pregnant rabbits at intravenous doses ≥3 mg per kg, or every six days during organogenesis at subcutaneous doses ≥0.1 mg per kg. Adverse embryofetal effects included increased incidences of postimplantation loss and fetal malformations, including anasarca, umbilical hernia, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis, cleft palate, ectrodactyly, intestinal atresia, spina bifida, encephalomeningocele, heart and major vessel defects, and skeletal malformations (fused vertebrae, sternebrae, and ribs; supernumerary vertebral arches and ribs; and incomplete ossification).
The maternal No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) in these studies was 3 mg per kg. Aflibercept produced fetal malformations at all doses assessed in rabbits and the fetal NOAEL was not identified. At the lowest dose shown to produce adverse embryofetal effects in rabbits (0.1 mg per kg), systemic exposure (AUC) of free aflibercept was approximately 0.9-fold of the population pharmacokinetic estimated systemic exposure (AUC) in humans after an intravitreal dose of 8 mg.
Pediatric Use of Eylea Hd
Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of EYLEA HD in pediatric patients have not been established.
Contraindications for Eylea Hd
Ocular or Periocular Infections EYLEA HD is contraindicated in patients with ocular or periocular infections.
Active Intraocular Inflammation EYLEA HD is contraindicated in patients with active intraocular inflammation.
Overdosage Information for Eylea Hd
Overdosing with increased injection volume may increase intraocular pressure. Therefore, in case of overdosage, intraocular pressure should be monitored and if deemed necessary by the treating physician, adequate treatment should be initiated.
Clinical Studies of Eylea Hd
Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular
Degeneration (nAMD) The safety and efficacy of EYLEA HD were assessed in a randomized, multi-center, double-masked, active-controlled study (PULSAR) in treatment-naïve patients with nAMD. A total of 1009 patients were treated and analyzed for efficacy (673 with EYLEA HD). In the EYLEA HD groups, patients could be treated as frequently as every 8 weeks based on protocol-defined visual and anatomic criteria, starting at week 16.
Starting at week 52, patient dosing intervals could be extended by 4-week increments if all protocol-defined visual and anatomic criteria were met at visits in Year 2 (i.e., BCVA loss <5 letters from Week 12, no fluid in the central subfield on OCT, and no new onset foveal hemorrhage or foveal neovascularization). Patients ranged from 50 to 96 years of age with a mean of 74.5 years. At baseline, mean visual acuity was approximately 60 letters (range: 24 to 78 letters).
The primary efficacy endpoint was the change from baseline in BCVA at week 48 as measured by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letter score. Both HDq12 and HDq16 treatments were shown to be non-inferior and clinically equivalent to 2q8 treatment with respect to the change in BCVA score at week 48 using the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 4 letters. 6.2% of total EYLEA HD treated patients who met protocol-defined criteria to be treated every 8 weeks did not maintain a response with every 8 weeks dosing after successful response to the 3 initial monthly doses. The treatment effect with EYLEA HD in mean change in BCVA was maintained through week 96.
During the second year of treatment in patients who completed week 96, the mean number of injections administered was 3 in the HDq16 group (n=292), 3.7 in the HDq12 group (n=291) and 5.8 in the 2q8 group (n=286). Detailed results from the analysis of the PULSAR study are shown in Table 3 and Figure 8 below. Efficacy results in all subgroups (e.g., age, gender, geographic region, ethnicity, race, baseline BCVA and lesion type) were consistent with those in the overall population.
Table 3: Efficacy Outcomes at Weeks 48 and 96 (Full Analysis Set) in PULSAR Study Figure 8: Mean Change from Baseline in BCVA as measured by ETDRS Letter Score by Visits through Week 96 (Observed Cases) Figure 8
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
The safety and efficacy of EYLEA HD was assessed in a randomized, multi-center, double-masked, active-controlled study (PHOTON) in patients with DME involving the center of the macula. A total of 658 patients were treated and analyzed for efficacy (491 with EYLEA HD). Patient ages ranged from 24 to 90 years with a mean of 62.3 years.
A total of 44% of patients were previously treated for DME. At baseline, the overall mean visual acuity was 63 letters (range: 24 to 79 letters). During the second year of treatment, in patients completing week 96, the mean number of injections administered was 2.8 in the HDq16 group (n=139), 3.5 in the HDq12 group (n=256) and 5.9 in the 2q8 group (n=139).
Detailed results from the analysis of the PHOTON study are shown in Table 4 and Figure 9 below.
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) Efficacy and safety data of EYLEA HD in diabetic retinopathy (DR) are derived from the PHOTON study. In the PHOTON study, a key efficacy outcome was the change in the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (ETDRS-DRSS). Each EYLEA HD group was compared to the 2q8 group using a non-inferiority margin of 10%.
The ETDRS-DRSS score was assessed at baseline and approximately every 3 months thereafter for the duration of the study. Baseline ETDRS-DRSS scores were generally balanced across treatment groups. 1.5% of total EYLEA HD treated patients who met protocol-defined criteria to be treated every 8 weeks did not maintain a response with every 8 weeks dosing after successful response to the 3 initial monthly doses. Results from the analysis of ETDRS-DRSS scores at weeks 48 and 96 in the PHOTON study are shown in Table 5 below: Table 5: Proportion of Patients Who Achieved a ≥2-Step Improvement from Baseline in the ETDRS-DRSS Score at Weeks 48 and 96 (Full Analysis Set) in PHOTON did not meet the non-inferiority criteria for the proportion of patients with a ≥2-step improvement on ETDRS-DRSS and is not considered clinically equivalent to EYLEA administered every 8 weeks.
Results of the subgroups (e.g., age, gender, geographic region, race, ethnicity, baseline BCVA, baseline CRT and prior DME treatment) on the proportion of patients who achieved a ≥2-step improvement on the ETDRS-DRSS from baseline to week 96 were, in general, consistent with those in the overall population.
Macular Edema Following Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO)
The safety and efficacy of EYLEA HD was assessed in a randomized, multi-center, double-masked, active-controlled study (QUASAR) in patients with treatment naïve macular edema secondary to RVO. Dosing intervals could be shortened or extended by 4-week increments based on protocol-defined visual and anatomic criteria. Intervals could be shortened beginning at week 16 for the HDq8/3 group, at week 24 for the HDq8/5 group and, if previously extended, at week 40 for the 2q4 group; intervals could be extended beginning at week 32 for the HDq8/3 and 2q4 groups and at week 40 for the HDq8/5 group.
Patient ages ranged from 23 to 95 years with a mean of 65.9 years. At baseline, mean visual acuity was approximately 55 letters (range: 18 to 74 letters). Detailed results from the analysis of the QUASAR study are shown in Table 6 and Figure 10 below.
| Efficacy Outcomes | EYLEA HDq12 | EYLEA HDq16 | EYLEA 2q8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity; ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; SD = Standard Deviation; LS = Least Square; SE = Standard Error; CI = Confidence Interval; MMRM = Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements | |||
| Full Analysis Set Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication | N=335 | N=338 | N=336 |
| Efficacy Outcomes at Week 48 | |||
| Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) Observed values at week 48: n=299 for HDq12; n=289 for HDq16; n=285 for 2q8 | 6.7 (12.6) | 6.2 (11.7) | 7.6 (12.2) |
| LS mean (SE) change from baseline Estimate based on the MMRM model, was computed for the differences of HDq12 minus 2q8 and HDq16 minus 2q8, respectively, with two-sided 95% CIs | 6.1 (0.8) | 5.9 (0.7) | 7.0 (0.7) |
| Difference in LS mean (95% CI) | -1.0 (-2.9, 0.9) | -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7) | |
| Efficacy Outcomes at Week 96 | |||
| Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) Observed values at week 96: n=256 for HDq12; n=264 for HDq16; n=243 for 2q8 | 5.9 (14.2) | 5.6 (13.7) | 7.4 (13.8) |
| LS mean (SE) change from baseline | 5.6 (0.8) | 5.5 (0.8) | 6.6 (0.7) |
| Difference in LS mean (95% CI), A non-inferiority margin was not available for week 96 | -1.0 (-2.8, 0.8) | -1.1 (-2.9, 0.7) | |
| Efficacy Outcomes | EYLEA HDq12 | EYLEA HDq16 | EYLEA 2q8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity; ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; SD = Standard Deviation; LS = Least Square; SE = Standard Error; CI = Confidence Interval; MMRM = Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements. | |||
| Full Analysis Set FAS includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication | N=328 | N=163 | N=167 |
| Efficacy Outcomes at Week 48 | |||
| Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) Observed values at week 48: n=277 for HDq12; n=149 for HDq16; n=150 for 2q8 | 8.8 (9.0) | 7.9 (8.4) | 9.2 (9.0) |
| LS mean (SE) change from baseline Estimate based on the MMRM model, was computed for the differences of HDq12 minus 2q8 and HDq16 minus 2q8, respectively with two-sided 95% CIs | 8.1 (0.6) | 7.2 (0.7) | 8.7 (0.7) |
| Difference in LS mean (95% CI) | -0.6 (-2.3, 1.1) | -1.4 (-3.3, 0.4) | |
| Efficacy Outcomes at Week 96 | |||
| Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) Observed values at week 96: n= 222 for HDq12; n=127 for HDq16; n=124 for 2q8 | 8.8 (9.9) | 7.5 (9.9) | 8.4 (11.1) |
| LS mean (SE) change from baseline | 8.2 (0.6) | 6.6 (0.8) | 7.7 (0.9) |
| Difference in LS mean (95% CI), A non-inferiority margin was not available for week 96 | 0.5 (-1.6, 2.5) | -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1) | |
| Efficacy Outcomes | EYLEA HDq12 | EYLEA HDq16 | EYLEA 2q8 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Missing or non-gradable post-baseline ETDRS-DRSS values were imputed using the last gradable ETDRS-DRSS values. Patients were considered as non-responders if all post-baseline measurements were missing or non-gradable. Missing or ungradable baseline was not included in the denominator. | |||
| Full Analysis Set FAS includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication | N=328 | N=163 | N=167 |
| Efficacy Outcomes at Week 48 | |||
| Proportion of patients with a ≥2-step improvement on ETDRS-DRSS from Baseline (%) Last observation carried forward | 29% | 20% | 27% |
| Difference Difference with confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Mantel-Haenszel weighting scheme (%) (95% CI) | 2% (-6.6, 10.6) | -8% (-16.9, 1.8) | |
| Efficacy Outcomes at Week 96 | |||
| Proportion of patients with a ≥2-step improvement on ETDRS-DRSS from Baseline (%) | 34% | 22% | 31% |
| Difference (%) (95% CI), A non-inferiority margin was not available for week 96 | 2.6% (-6.2, 11.5) | -9.3% (-19.0, 0.3) | |
| Efficacy Outcomes | EYLEA HDq8/3 | EYLEA HDq8/5 | EYLEA 2q4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Full Analysis Set Full Analysis Set (FAS) includes all randomized patients who received at least 1 dose of study medication | N=293 | N=298 | N=301 |
| BCVA = Best Corrected Visual Acuity; ETDRS = Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; SD = Standard Deviation; LS = Least Square; SE = Standard Error; CI = Confidence Interval; MMRM = Mixed Model for Repeated Measurements | |||
| Mean change in BCVA as measured by ETDRS letter score from baseline (SD) at week 36 Observed values at week 36: n=260 for HDq8/3; n=248 for HDq8/5; n=264 for 2q4 | 17.0 (11.8) | 19.1 (11.2) | 17.8 (13.1) |
| LS mean (SE) change from baseline Estimate based on the MMRM model, was computed for the differences of HDq8/3 minus 2q4 and HDq8/5 minus 2q4, respectively, with two-sided 95% CIs | 17.0 (0.7) | 17.9 (0.6) | 17.1 (0.7) |
| Difference in LS mean (95% CI) | -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9) | 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7) | |
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Eylea Hd?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Eylea Hd Prices