Exenatide Drug Information

Generic name: EXENATIDE

GLP-1 Receptor Agonist [EPC]

Save on Exenatide at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Exenatide

Exenatide injection is indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exenatide injection is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist indicated as an adjunct to diet and exercise to improve glycemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Limitations of Use Co-administration with other exenatide-containing products is not recommended.

Limitations of Use Exenatide injection contains exenatide. Co-administration with other exenatide-containing products is not recommended.

Dosage & Administration of Exenatide

Recommended Dosing Initiate exenatide injection at 5 mcg administered subcutaneously twice daily

at any time within the 60-minute period before the morning and evening meals (or before the two main meals of the day, approximately 6 hours or more apart). Do not administer after a meal. Based on clinical response, the dose of exenatide injection can be increased to 10 mcg twice daily which is recommended after 1 month of therapy, in order to reduce the risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions . Administer as a subcutaneous injection in the thigh, abdomen, or upper arm. Rotate injections sites with each dose.

Do not use the same site for each injection. Inspect visually for particulate matter and discoloration. Only use exenatide injection if the solution appears clear, colorless and contains no particles.

When using exenatide injection with insulin, administer as separate injections and never mix. It is acceptable to inject exenatide injection and insulin in the same body region, but the injections should not be adjacent to each other. If a dose is missed, resume the treatment regimen as prescribed with the next scheduled dose.

Side Effects of Exenatide

Clinical Trial Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Hypoglycemia Table 1 summarizes the incidence and rate of hypoglycemia with exenatide in six placebo-controlled clinical trials. Table 1: Incidence (%) and Rate of Hypoglycemia when Exenatide was used as Monotherapy or with Concomitant Antidiabetic Therapy in Six Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trials * Placebo BID Exenatide 5 mcg BID Exenatide 10 mcg BID Monotherapy (24 Weeks) N 77 77 78 % Overall 1.3% 5.2% 3.8% Rate (episodes/patient-year) 0.03 0.21 0.52 % Severe 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% With Metformin (30 Weeks) N 113 110 113 % Overall 5.3% 4.5% 5.3% Rate (episodes/patient-year) 0.12 0.13 0.12 % Severe 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% With a Sulfonylurea (30 Weeks) N 123 125 129 % Overall 3.3% 14.4% 35.7% Rate (episodes/patient-year) 0.07 0.64 1.61 % Severe 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% With Metformin and a Sulfonylurea (30 Weeks) N 247 245 241 % Overall 12.6% 19.2% 27.8% Rate (episodes/patient-year) 0.58 0.78 1.71 % Severe 0.0% 0.4% 0.0% With a Thiazolidinedione (16 Weeks) N 112 not evaluated 121 % Overall 7.1% not evaluated 10.7% Rate (episodes/patient-years) 0.56 not evaluated 0.98 % Severe 0.0% not evaluated 0.0% With Insulin Glargine with or without Metformin and/or Thiazolidinedione (30 Weeks) † N 122 not evaluated 137 % Overall 29.5% not evaluated 24.8% Rate (episodes/patient-years) 1.58 not evaluated 1.61 % Severe 0.8% not evaluated 0.0% * A hypoglycemic episode was recorded if a patient reported symptoms of hypoglycemia with or without a blood glucose value consistent with hypoglycemia.

Severe hypoglycemia was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia requiring the assistance of another person and associated with either a documented blood glucose value < 54 mg/dL or prompt recovery after treatment for hypoglycemia. † When exenatide was initiated in combination with insulin glargine, the dose of insulin glargine was decreased by 20% in patients with an HbA 1c ≤ 8.0% to minimize the risk of hypoglycemia. See Table 10 for insulin dose titration algorithm. N = number of Intent-to-Treat subjects in each treatment group.

Immunogenicity Antibodies were assessed in 90% of subjects in the 30-week, 24-week, and 16-week studies of exenatide. In the 30-week controlled trials of exenatide add-on to metformin and/or sulfonylurea, antibodies were assessed at 2- to 6-week intervals. The mean antibody titer peaked at Week 6 and was reduced by 55% by Week 30. Three hundred and sixty patients (38%) had low titer antibodies (< 625) to exenatide at 30 weeks.

The level of glycemic control (HbA 1c ) in these patients was generally comparable to that observed in the 534 patients (56%) without antibody titers. An additional 59 patients (6%) had higher titer antibodies (≥ 625) at 30 weeks. Of these patients, 32 (3% overall) had an attenuated glycemic response to exenatide; the remaining 27 (3% overall) had a glycemic response comparable to that of patients without antibodies.

In the 16-week trial of exenatide add-on to thiazolidinediones, with or without metformin, 36 patients (31%) had low titer antibodies to exenatide at 16 weeks. The level of glycemic control in these patients was generally comparable to that observed in the 69 patients (60%) without antibody titer. An additional 10 patients (9%) had higher titer antibodies at 16 weeks.

Of these patients, 4 (4% overall) had an attenuated glycemic response to exenatide; the remaining 6 (5% overall) had a glycemic response comparable to that of patients without antibodies. In the 24-week trial of exenatide used as monotherapy, 40 patients (28%) had low titer antibodies to exenatide at 24 weeks. The level of glycemic control in these patients was generally comparable to that observed in the 101 patients (70%) without antibody titers.

An additional 3 patients (2%) had higher titer antibodies at 24 weeks. Of these patients, 1 (1% overall) had an attenuated glycemic response to exenatide; the remaining 2 (1% overall) had a glycemic response comparable to that of patients without antibodies. Antibodies to exenatide were not assessed in the 30-week placebo-controlled trial of exenatide used in combination with insulin glargine.

In the 30-week comparator-controlled trial of exenatide used in combination with insulin glargine and metformin, 60 patients (20%) had low titer antibodies to exenatide at 30 weeks. The level of glycemic control in these patients was generally comparable to that observed in the 234 patients (77%) without antibody titers. An additional 10 patients (3%) had higher titer antibodies at 30 weeks.

Of these patients, 2 (1% overall) had an attenuated glycemic response to exenatide; the remaining 8 (3% overall) had a glycemic response comparable to that of patients without antibodies. Two hundred and ten patients with antibodies to exenatide in the exenatide clinical trials were tested for the presence of cross-reactive antibodies to GLP-1 and/or glucagon. No treatment-emergent cross-reactive antibodies were observed across the range of titers.

Other Adverse Reactions Monotherapy For the 24-week placebo-controlled study of exenatide used as a monotherapy, Table 2 summarizes adverse reactions (excluding hypoglycemia) occurring with an incidence ≥ 2% and occurring more frequently in exenatide-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients. Table 2: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions ≥ 2% Incidence with Exenatide used as Monotherapy (excluding Hypoglycemia) * Monotherapy Placebo BID N=77 % All Exenatide BID N=155 % Nausea 0 8 Vomiting 0 4 Dyspepsia 0 3 * In a 24-week placebo-controlled trial. BID = twice daily.

Adverse reactions reported in ≥ 1.0% to < 2.0% of patients receiving exenatide and reported more frequently than with placebo included decreased appetite, diarrhea and dizziness. The most frequently reported adverse reaction associated with exenatide, nausea, occurred in a dose-dependent fashion. Two of the 155 patients treated with exenatide withdrew due to adverse reactions of headache and nausea.

No placebo-treated patients withdrew due to adverse reactions. Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis In a clinical study with exenatide, 1.9% of exenatide-treated patients and 1.4% of placebo-treated patients reported an acute event of gallbladder disease, such as cholelithiasis or cholecystitis. Combination Therapy Add-On to Metformin and/or Sulfonylurea In the three 30-week controlled trials of exenatide add-on to metformin and/or sulfonylurea, adverse reactions (excluding hypoglycemia) with an incidence ≥ 2% and occurring more frequently in exenatide-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients are summarized in Table 3. Table 3: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions ≥ 2% Incidence and Greater Incidence with Exenatide Treatment used with Metformin and/or a Sulfonylurea (excluding Hypoglycemia) * Placebo BID N=483 % All Exenatide BID N=963 % Nausea 18 44 Vomiting 4 13 Diarrhea 6 13 Feeling Jittery 4 9 Dizziness 6 9 Headache 6 9 Dyspepsia 3 6 Asthenia 2 4 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 1 3 Hyperhidrosis 1 3 * In three 30-week placebo-controlled clinical trials.

BID = twice daily. Adverse reactions reported in ≥ 1.0% to < 2.0% of patients receiving exenatide and reported more frequently than with placebo included decreased appetite. Nausea was the most frequently reported adverse reaction and occurred in a dose-dependent fashion.

With continued therapy, the frequency and severity decreased over time in most of the patients who initially experienced nausea. Patients in the long-term uncontrolled open-label extension studies at 52 weeks reported no new types of adverse reactions than those observed in the 30-week controlled trials. The most common adverse reactions leading to withdrawal for exenatide-treated patients were nausea (3% of patients) and vomiting (1%). For placebo-treated patients, < 1% withdrew due to nausea and none due to vomiting.

Add-On to Thiazolidinedione with or without Metformin For the 16-week placebo-controlled study of exenatide add-on to a thiazolidinedione, with or without metformin, Table 4 summarizes the adverse reactions (excluding hypoglycemia) with an incidence of ≥ 2% and occurring more frequently in exenatide-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients. Table 4: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions ≥ 2% Incidence with Exenatide used with a Thiazolidinedione (TZD), with or without Metformin (MET) (excluding Hypoglycemia) * With a TZD or TZD/MET Placebo N=112 % All Exenatide BID N=121 % Nausea 15 40 Vomiting 1 13 Dyspepsia 1 7 Diarrhea 3 6 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 0 3 * In a 16-week placebo-controlled clinical trial. BID = twice daily.

Adverse reactions reported in ≥ 1.0% to < 2.0% of patients receiving exenatide and reported more frequently than with placebo included decreased appetite. Chills (n=4) and injection-site reactions (n=2) occurred only in exenatide-treated patients. The two patients who reported an injection-site reaction had high titers of antibodies to exenatide.

Two serious adverse events (chest pain and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis) were reported in the exenatide arm. No serious adverse events were reported in the placebo arm. The most common adverse reactions leading to withdrawal for exenatide-treated patients were nausea (9%) and vomiting (5%). For placebo-treated patients, < 1% withdrew due to nausea.

Add-On to Insulin Glargine with or without Metformin and/or Thiazolidinedione (Placebo-Controlled) For the 30-week placebo-controlled study of exenatide as add-on to insulin glargine with or without oral antihyperglycemic medications, Table 5 summarizes adverse reactions (excluding hypoglycemia) occurring with an incidence ≥ 2% and occurring more frequently in exenatide-treated patients compared with placebo-treated patients. Table 5: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions ≥ 2% Incidence with Exenatide used with Insulin Glargine with or without Oral Antihyperglycemic Medications (excluding Hypoglycemia) * With Insulin Glargine Placebo N=122 % All Exenatide BID N=137 % Nausea 8 41 Vomiting 4 18 Diarrhea 8 18 Headache 4 14 Constipation 2 10 Dyspepsia 2 7 Asthenia 1 5 Abdominal Distension 1 4 Decreased Appetite 0 3 Flatulence 1 2 Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease 1 2 * In a 30-week placebo-controlled clinical trial. BID = twice daily.

The most frequently reported adverse reactions leading to withdrawal for exenatide-treated patients were nausea (5.1%) and vomiting (2.9%). No placebo-treated patients withdrew due to nausea or vomiting.

Post-marketing Experience

The following additional adverse reactions have been reported during post-approval use of exenatide or other formulations of exenatide. Because these events are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is generally not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Blood : Drug-induced thrombocytopenia.

Drug Interactions: International normalized ratio (INR) increased with concomitant warfarin use sometimes associated with bleeding . Gastrointestinal: Nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea resulting in dehydration; abdominal distension, abdominal pain, eructation, constipation, flatulence, ileus, acute pancreatitis, hemorrhagic and necrotizing pancreatitis sometimes resulting in death. Hepatobiliary: Cholecystitis, cholelithiasis requiring cholecystectomy. Hypersensitivity: Injection-site reactions, generalized pruritus and/or urticaria, macular or papular rash, angioedema, anaphylactic reaction.

Neurologic: Dysgeusia; somnolence, dysesthesia. Pulmonary: Pulmonary aspiration has occurred in patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists undergoing elective surgeries or procedures requiring general anesthesia or deep sedation. Renal: Altered renal function, including increased serum creatinine, renal impairment, worsened chronic renal failure or acute renal failure (sometimes requiring hemodialysis), kidney transplant and kidney transplant dysfunction.

Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue: Alopecia.

Warnings & Cautions for Exenatide

Acute Pancreatitis Acute pancreatitis, including fatal and non-fatal hemorrhagic or necrotizing pancreatitis

has been observed in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, including exenatide. After initiation of exenatide, observe patients carefully for signs and symptoms of pancreatitis (including persistent severe abdominal pain, sometimes radiating to the back and which may or may not be accompanied by vomiting). If pancreatitis is suspected, discontinue exenatide and initiate appropriate management.

Never Share an Exenatide Injection Pen Between Patients Exenatide injection pens must

never be shared between patients, even if the needle is changed. Pen-sharing poses a risk for transmission of blood-borne pathogens.

Hypoglycemia with

Concomitant Use of Insulin Secretagogues or Insulin Patients receiving exenatide in combination with an insulin secretagogue (e.g., sulfonylurea) or insulin may have an increased risk of hypoglycemia including severe hypoglycemia . The risk of hypoglycemia may be lowered by a reduction in the dose of sulfonylurea (or other concomitantly administered insulin secretagogue) or insulin. Inform patients using these concomitant medications of the risk of hypoglycemia and educate them on the signs and symptoms of hypoglycemia.

Acute Kidney Injury Due to Volume Depletion

There have been post-marketing reports of acute kidney injury, in some cases requiring hemodialysis, in patients treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists, exenatide. The majority of the reported events occurred in patients who experienced gastrointestinal reactions leading to dehydration such as nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea. Monitor renal function in patients reporting adverse reactions to exenatide that could lead to volume depletion, especially during dosage initiation and escalation of exenatide.

Exenatide is not recommended in patients with severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance <30 mL/min) or end-stage renal disease and should be used with caution in patients with renal transplantation .

Severe Gastrointestinal Adverse Reactions Use of

GLP-1 receptor agonists, including exenatide, has been associated with gastrointestinal adverse reactions, sometimes severe. Exenatide is not recommended in patients with severe gastroparesis.

Immunogenicity Patients may develop antibodies to exenatide following treatment with exenatide. Antibody

levels were measured in 90% of subjects in the 30-week, 24-week, and 16-week placebo-controlled studies and the 30-week comparator-controlled study of exenatide. In 3%, 4%, 1% and 1% of these patients, respectively, antibody formation was associated with an attenuated glycemic response. If there is worsening glycemic control or failure to achieve targeted glycemic control, alternative antidiabetic therapy should be considered .

Hypersensitivity

There have been post-marketing reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis and angioedema) in patients treated with exenatide. If a hypersensitivity reaction occurs, the patient should discontinue exenatide and other suspect medications and promptly seek medical advice. Inform and closely monitor patients with a history of anaphylaxis or angioedema with another GLP-1 receptor agonist for allergic reactions, because it is unknown whether such patients will be predisposed to anaphylaxis with exenatide .

Drug-Induced Thrombocytopenia Serious bleeding, which may be fatal, from drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia

has been reported in the post-marketing setting with exenatide use. Drug-induced thrombocytopenia is an immune-mediated reaction, with exenatide-dependent anti-platelet antibodies. In the presence of exenatide, these antibodies cause platelet destruction.

If drug-induced thrombocytopenia is suspected, discontinue exenatide immediately and do not re-expose the patient to exenatide .

Acute Gallbladder Disease Acute events of gallbladder disease such as cholelithiasis or

cholecystitis have been reported in GLP-1 receptor agonist trials and post-marketing. In a clinical study with exenatide, 1.9% of exenatide-treated patients and 1.4% of placebo-treated patients reported an acute event of gallbladder disease, such as cholelithiasis or cholecystitis. If cholelithiasis is suspected, gallbladder studies and appropriate clinical follow-up are indicated. 5.10 Pulmonary Aspiration During General Anesthesia or Deep Sedation Exenatide delays gastric emptying . There have been rare post-marketing reports of pulmonary aspiration in patients receiving GLP-1 receptor agonists undergoing elective surgeries or procedures requiring general anesthesia or deep sedation who had residual gastric contents despite reported adherence to preoperative fasting recommendations.

Available data are insufficient to inform recommendations to mitigate the risk of pulmonary aspiration during general anesthesia or deep sedation in patients taking exenatide, including whether modifying preoperative fasting recommendations or temporarily discontinuing exenatide could reduce the incidence of retained gastric contents. Instruct patients to inform healthcare providers prior to any planned surgeries or procedures if they are taking exenatide.

Drug Interactions with Exenatide

  • Table 6: Clinically Relevant Interactions with Exenatide Concomitant Use of Insulin Secretagogues or Insulin Clinical Impact Exenatide promotes insulin release from pancreatic beta-cells in the presence of elevated glucose concentrations. The risk of hypoglycemia is increased when exenatide is used in combination with insulin secretagogues (e.g., sulfonylureas) or insulin . Intervention When initiating exenatide, consider reducing the dose of concomitantly administered insulin secretagogue or insulin to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Warfarin Clinical Impact In a drug interaction study, exenatide did not have a significant effect on INR . There have been post-marketing reports for exenatide of increased INR with concomitant use of warfarin, sometimes associated with bleeding . Intervention In patients taking warfarin, the prothrombin time should be monitored more frequently after initiation or alteration of exenatide therapy. Once a stable prothrombin time has been documented, the prothrombin time can be monitored at the intervals recommended for patients taking warfarin. Orally Administered Drugs (e.g., acetaminophen) Clinical Impact Exenatide slows gastric emptying. Therefore, exenatide has the potential to reduce the rate of absorption of orally administered drugs. Intervention Use caution when administering oral medications with exenatide where a slower rate of oral absorption may be clinically meaningful. For oral medications that are dependent on threshold concentrations for efficacy, such as contraceptives and antibiotics, patients should be advised to take those drugs at least 1 hour before exenatide injection. If such drugs are to be administered with food, patients should be advised to take them with a meal or snack when exenatide is not administered . May impact absorption of orally administered medications.
  • Warfarin: Post-marketing reports of increased INR sometimes associated with bleeding. Monitor INR frequently until stable upon initiation or alteration of exenatide therapy.

Pregnancy Safety for Exenatide

Pregnancy Risk Summary Limited data with exenatide in pregnant women are not sufficient to determine a drug-associated risk for major birth defects or miscarriage. There are risks to the mother and fetus associated with poorly controlled diabetes in pregnancy (see Clinical Considerations). Based on animal reproduction studies, there may be risks to the fetus from exposure to exenatide during pregnancy. Exenatide should be used during pregnancy only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus.

Animal reproduction studies identified increased adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes from exposure to exenatide during pregnancy and lactation in association with maternal effects. In mice, exenatide administered during gestation and lactation caused increased neonatal deaths at systemic exposure 3-times the human exposure resulting from the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 20 mcg/day for exenatide (see Data). The estimated background risk of major birth defects is 6% to 10% in women with pre-gestational diabetes with an HbA 1c > 7 and has been reported to be as high as 20% to 25% in women with HbA 1c > 10. The estimated background risk of miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively.

Clinical Considerations Disease-associated maternal and/or embryofetal risk Poorly controlled diabetes in pregnancy increases the maternal risk for diabetic ketoacidosis, preeclampsia, spontaneous abortions, preterm delivery, and delivery complications. Poorly controlled diabetes increases the fetal risk for major birth defects, stillbirth, and macrosomia related morbidity. Data Animal Data In studies evaluating reproduction and development in pregnant mice and rabbits, maternal animals were administered exenatide, the active ingredient in exenatide injection, by subcutaneous injection twice a day.

In pregnant mice given 6, 68, 460, or 760 mcg/kg/day exenatide during fetal organogenesis, skeletal variations associated with slowed fetal growth, including changes in number of rib pairs or vertebral ossifications sites, and wavy ribs were observed at 760 mcg/kg/day, a dose that produced maternal toxicity and yielded systemic exposure 390-times the human exposure resulting from the MRHD of exenatide based on AUC comparison. In pregnant rabbits given 0.2, 2, 22, 156, or 260 mcg/kg/day exenatide during fetal organogenesis, irregular fetal skeletal ossifications were observed at 2 mcg/kg/day, a dose yielding systemic exposure up to 12-times the human exposure from the MRHD of exenatide based on AUC comparison. In maternal mice given 6, 68, or 760 mcg/kg/day exenatide from gestation day 6 through lactation day 20 (weaning), an increased number of neonatal deaths was observed on postpartum days 2 to 4 in dams given 6 mcg/kg/day, a dose yielding a systemic exposure 3-times the human exposure from the MRHD of exenatide based on AUC comparison.

Pediatric Use of Exenatide

Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of exenatide have not been established in pediatric patients. Effectiveness of exenatide was not demonstrated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in 120 pediatric patients (78 received exenatide and 42 received placebo) aged 10 to 17 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Contraindications for Exenatide

Exenatide injection is contraindicated in patients with: A prior severe hypersensitivity reaction to exenatide or to any of the excipients in exenatide injection. Serious hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis and angioedema have been reported with exenatide injection . A history of drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia from exenatide products. Serious bleeding, which may be fatal, from drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia has been reported with exenatide use.

History of severe hypersensitivity to exenatide or any of the excipients in exenatide injection. History of drug-induced immune-mediated thrombocytopenia from exenatide products.

Overdosage Information for Exenatide

In a clinical study of exenatide, three patients with type 2 diabetes each experienced a single overdose of 100 mcg SC (10-times the maximum recommended dose). Effects of the overdoses included severe nausea, severe vomiting and rapidly declining blood glucose concentrations. One of the three patients experienced severe hypoglycemia requiring parenteral glucose administration. The three patients recovered without complication.

In the event of overdose, consider contacting the Poison Help line (1-800-222-1222) or a medical toxicologist for additional overdosage management recommendations. Initiate appropriate supportive treatment according to the patient’s clinical signs and symptoms.

Clinical Studies of Exenatide

Monotherapy

In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 24 weeks duration, exenatide 5 mcg BID (n=77), exenatide 10 mcg BID (n=78), or placebo BID (n=77) was used as monotherapy in patients with entry HbA 1c ranging from 6.5% to 10%. All patients assigned to exenatide initially received 5 mcg BID for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, those patients either continued to receive exenatide 5 mcg BID or had their dose increased to 10 mcg BID. Patients assigned to placebo received placebo BID throughout the trial. Exenatide or placebo was injected subcutaneously before the morning and evening meals.

The majority of patients (68%) were White, 26% were West Asian, 3% were Hispanic or Latino ethnicity, 3% were Black or African American and 0.4% were of East Asian ethnicity. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA 1c from baseline to Week 24 (or the last value at time of early discontinuation). Compared to placebo, exenatide 5 mcg BID and 10 mcg BID resulted in statistically significant reductions in HbA 1c from baseline at Week 24 (Table 7). Table 7: Results of 24-Week Placebo-Controlled Trial of Exenatide used as Monotherapy Placebo BID Exenatide 5 mcg BID Exenatide 10 mcg * BID Intent-to-Treat Population (N) 77 77 78 HbA 1c (%), Mean Baseline 7.8 7.9

Change at Week 24 † -0.2 -0.7 -0.9 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -0.5 ‡ -

Proportion Achieving HbA 1c < 7% 38% 48% 53% Body Weight (kg)

Mean Baseline 86.1 85.1

Change at Week 24 † -1.5 -2.7 -2.9 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -1.3 -

Fasting Serum Glucose § (mg/dL), Mean Baseline 159 166 155 Change at

Week 24 † -5 -17 -19 Difference from placebo † (95% CI) -12 -14 * Exenatide 5 mcg twice daily (BID) for 1 month followed by 10 mcg BID for 5 months before the morning and evening meals. † Least squares means are adjusted for screening HbA 1c strata and baseline value of the dependent variable. ‡ p < 0.01, treatment vs. placebo. § Measured using the hexokinase-based glucose method. BID = twice daily. On average, there were no adverse effects of exenatide on blood pressure or lipids.

Combination Therapy with Oral Antihyperglycemic Medicines Three 30-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were

conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exenatide in patients with type 2 diabetes whose glycemic control was inadequate with metformin alone, a sulfonylurea alone, or metformin in combination with a sulfonylurea. In addition, a 16-week, placebo-controlled trial was conducted where exenatide was added to existing thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) treatment, with or without metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control. In the 30-week trials, after a 4-week placebo lead-in period, patients were randomly assigned to receive exenatide 5 mcg BID, exenatide 10 mcg BID, or placebo BID before the morning and evening meals, in addition to their existing oral antidiabetic agent.

All patients assigned to exenatide initially received 5 mcg BID for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, those patients either continued to receive exenatide 5 mcg BID or had their dose increased to 10 mcg BID. Patients assigned to placebo received placebo BID throughout the study. A total of 1,446 patients were randomized in the three 30-week trials: 991 (69%) were White, 224 (16%) were Hispanic or Latino and 174 (12%) were of Black of African American ethnicity.

Mean HbA 1c values at baseline for the trials ranged from 8.2% to 8.7%. In the placebo-controlled trial of 16 weeks duration, exenatide (n=121) or placebo (n=112) was added to existing thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) treatment, with or without metformin. Randomization to exenatide or placebo was stratified based on whether the patients were receiving metformin. Exenatide treatment was initiated at a dose of 5 mcg BID for 4 weeks then increased to 10 mcg BID for 12 more weeks.

Patients assigned to placebo received placebo BID throughout the study. Exenatide or placebo was injected subcutaneously before the morning and evening meals. In this trial, 79% of patients were taking a thiazolidinedione and metformin and 21% were taking a thiazolidinedione alone.

The majority of patients (84%) were White, 8% were Hispanic or Latino ethnicity and 3% were of Black or African American ethnicity. The mean baseline HbA 1c values were 7.9% for exenatide and placebo. The primary endpoint in each study was the mean change in HbA 1c from baseline to study end (or early discontinuation). Table 8 summarizes the study results for the 30- and 16-week clinical trials.

Table 8: Results of 30-Week and 16-Week Placebo-Controlled Trials of Exenatide used in Combination with Oral Antidiabetic Agents Placebo BID Exenatide 5 mcg BID Exenatide 10 mcg * BID In Combination with Metformin (30 Weeks) Intent-to-Treat Population (N) 113 110 113 HbA 1c (%), Mean Baseline 8.2 8.3

Change at Week 30 † -0.0 -0.5 -0.9 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -0.5 ‡ -0.9 ‡ Proportion Achieving HbA 1c < 7% 12% 32% 40% Body Weight (kg), Mean Baseline 99.9 100.0

Change at Week 30 † -0.2 -1.3 -2.6 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -1.1 -

Fasting Plasma Glucose § (mg/dL), Mean Baseline 169 176 168 Change at

Week 30 † +14 -5 -10 Difference from placebo † (95% CI) -20 -24 In Combination with a Sulfonylurea (30 Weeks) Intent-to-Treat Population (N) 123 125 129 HbA 1c (%), Mean Baseline 8.7 8.5

Change at Week 30 † +0.1 -0.5 -0.9 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -0.6 ‡ -1.0 ‡ Proportion Achieving HbA 1c < 7% 10% 25% 36% Body Weight (kg), Mean Baseline 99.1 94.9

Change at Week 30 † -0.8 -1.1 -1.6 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -0.3 -

Fasting Plasma Glucose § (mg/dL), Mean Baseline 194 180 178 Change at

Week 30 † +6 -5 -11 Difference from placebo † (95% CI) -11 -17 In Combination with Metformin and a Sulfonylurea (30 Weeks) Intent-to-Treat Population (N) 247 245 241 HbA 1c (%), Mean Baseline 8.5 8.5

Change at Week 30 † +0.1 -0.7 -0.9 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -0.8 ‡ -1.0 ‡ Proportion Achieving HbA 1c < 7% 8% 25% 31% Body Weight (kg), Mean Baseline 99.1 96.9

Change at Week 30 † -0.9 -1.6 -1.6 Difference from placebo †

(95% CI) -0.7 -

Fasting Plasma Glucose § (mg/dL), Mean Baseline 181 182 178 Change at

Week 30 † +13 -11 -12 Difference from placebo † (95% CI) -24 -25 In Combination with a Thiazolidinedione or a Thiazolidinedione plus Metformin (16 Weeks) Intent-to-Treat Population (N) 112 Dose not studied 121 HbA 1c (%), Mean Baseline

Dose not studied 7.9 Change at Week 16 † +0.1 Dose not

studied -

Difference from placebo † (95% CI) Dose not studied -0.9 ‡ Proportion

Achieving HbA 1c < 7% 15% Dose not studied 51% Body Weight (kg), Mean Baseline

Dose not studied 97.5 Change at Week 16 † -0.0 Dose not

studied -

Difference from placebo † (95% CI) Dose not studied -1.5 Fasting Serum

Glucose § (mg/dL), Mean Baseline 159 Dose not studied 164 Change at Week 16 † +4 Dose not studied -21 Difference from placebo † (95% CI) Dose not studied -25 * Exenatide 5 mcg twice daily for 1 month followed by 10 mcg BID for 6 months for the 30-week trials or 10 mcg BID for 3 months in the 16-week trial before the morning and evening meals. † Least squares means are adjusted for baseline HbA 1c strata or value, investigator site, baseline value of the dependent variable (if applicable) and background antihyperglycemic therapy (if applicable). ‡ p < 0.01, treatment vs. placebo. § Measured using the hexokinase-based glucose method. BID = twice daily. HbA 1c The addition of exenatide to a regimen of metformin, a sulfonylurea, or both, resulted in statistically significant reductions from baseline in HbA 1c compared with patients receiving placebo added to these agents in the three controlled trials (Table 8). In the 16-week trial of exenatide add-on to thiazolidinediones, with or without metformin, exenatide resulted in statistically significant reductions from baseline in HbA 1c compared with patients receiving placebo (Table 8). Postprandial Glucose Postprandial glucose was measured after a mixed meal tolerance test in 9.5% of patients participating in the 30-week add-on to metformin, add-on to sulfonylurea, and add-on to metformin in combination with sulfonylurea clinical trials.

In this pooled subset of patients, exenatide reduced postprandial plasma glucose concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. The mean (SD) change in 2-hour postprandial glucose concentration following administration of exenatide at Week 30 relative to baseline was −63 mg/dL for 5 mcg BID (n=42), −71 mg/dL for 10 mcg BID (n=52) and +11 mg/dL for placebo BID (n=44).

Combination with Insulin Glargine 30-Week Placebo-Controlled Trial

A 30-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of exenatide (n=137) versus placebo (n=122) when added to titrated insulin glargine, with or without metformin and/or thiazolidinedione, in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control. All patients assigned to exenatide initially received 5 mcg BID for 4 weeks. After 4 weeks, those patients assigned to exenatide had their dose increased to 10 mcg BID. Patients assigned to placebo received placebo BID throughout the trial.

Exenatide or placebo was injected subcutaneously before the morning and evening meals. Patients with an HbA 1c ≤ 8.0% decreased their pre-study dose of insulin glargine by 20% and patients with an HbA 1c ≥ 8.1% maintained their current dose of insulin glargine. Five weeks after initiating randomized treatment, insulin doses were titrated with guidance from the investigator toward predefined fasting glucose targets according to the dose titration algorithm provided in Table 9. The majority of patients (78%) were White, 10% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 9% were Black or African American, 3% were Asian, and 0.8% were of multiple origins.

The primary endpoint was the change in HbA 1c from baseline to Week 30. Compared to placebo, exenatide 10 mcg BID resulted in statistically significant reductions in HbA 1c from baseline at Week 30 (Table 9) in patients receiving titrated insulin glargine. Table 9: 30-Week Placebo-Controlled Trial of Exenatide Used in Combination with Insulin Glargine with or without Metformin and/or Thiazolidinediones Placebo BID + Titrated Insulin Glargine Exenatide 10 mcg * BID + Titrated Insulin Glargine Intent-to-Treat Population (N) 122 137 HbA 1c (%), Mean Baseline 8.5

Change at Week 30 † -1.0 -1.7 Difference from placebo † (95%

CI) -0.7 ¶ Proportion Achieving HbA 1c < 7% 29% 56% Body Weight (kg), Mean Baseline 93.8

Change at Week 30 ‡ 1.0 -1.8 Difference from placebo ‡ (95%

CI) -2.7 ¶ Fasting Serum Glucose § (mg/dL), Mean Baseline 133 132 Change at Week 30 ‡ -16 -23 Difference from placebo ‡ (95% CI) -7 * Exenatide 5 mcg twice daily for 1 month followed by 10 mcg BID for 5 months for the 30-week trial. † Least squares means are based on a mixed model adjusting for treatment, pooled investigator, visit, baseline HbA 1c value and treatment by visit, where subject is treated as a random effect. ‡ Least squares means are based on a mixed model adjusting for treatment, pooled investigator, visit, baseline HbA 1c stratum, baseline value of the dependent variable (where applicable) and treatment by visit, where subject is treated as a random effect. § Patients in both groups titrated insulin glargine dose to achieve optimal fasting glucose concentrations. ¶ p < 0.01, treatment vs. placebo. BID = twice daily. Table 10: Dosing Algorithm for Titration of Insulin Glargine * Fasting Plasma Glucose Values (mg/dL) Dose Change (U) < 56 † -4 56 to 72 † -2 73 to 99 ‡ 0 100 to 119 ‡ +2 120 to 139 ‡ +4 140 to 179 ‡ +6 ≥ 180 ‡ +8 Abbreviations: U = units. * Adapted from Riddle et al. 2003. † Value for at least 1 fasting plasma glucose measurement since the last assessment. ‡ Based on the average of fasting plasma glucose measurements taken over the prior 3 to 7 days.

The increase in the total daily dose should not have exceeded more than 10 units per day or 10% of the current total daily dose, whichever was greater. 30-Week Comparator-Controlled Noninferiority Trial A 30 week, open-label, active comparator-controlled, noninferiority study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exenatide (n=315) versus titrated insulin lispro (n=312) on a background of optimized basal insulin glargine and metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control. Following a 12-week basal insulin optimization (BIO) phase, subjects with an HbA 1c > 7.0% entered a 30-week intervention phase and were randomized to add either exenatide or insulin lispro to their existing regimen of insulin glargine and metformin. Insulin glargine was titrated to a target fasting plasma glucose of 72 to 100 mg/dL. All patients assigned to exenatide initially received 5 mcg BID for four weeks.

After four weeks, their dose was increased to 10 mcg BID. Patients in the exenatide-treated arm with an HbA 1c ≤ 8.0% at the end of the BIO phase decreased their insulin glargine dose by at least 10%. All patients assigned to insulin lispro three times daily (TID) maintained their prior total daily insulin dose at baseline; however, the initial insulin lispro dose was ⅓ to 1/2; of the total daily insulin dose with the insulin glargine dose reduced accordingly. The insulin lispro dose was titrated based on preprandial glucose values. The majority of patients (87%) were White, 7% were American Indian or Alaska Native, 5% were Asian, and < 1% were of Black or African American ethnicity.

The primary endpoint was the change in HbA 1c from baseline to Week 30. Both exenatide 10 mcg BID and titrated lispro provided a mean reduction in HbA 1c at Week 30 that met the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. Table 11: 30-Week Comparator-Controlled Trial of Exenatide used in Combination with Insulin Glargine and Metformin Titrated Insulin Lispro TID + Titrated Insulin Glargine Exenatide 10 mcg * BID + Titrated Insulin Glargine Intent-to-Treat Population (N) 312 315 HbA 1c (%), Mean Baseline 8.2

Change at Week 30 † # −1.1 −1.1 Difference from Insulin Lispro

† # (95% CI) −

Body Weight (kg), Mean Baseline 89.3 89.9 Change at Week 30 †

# 1.9 −

Difference from Insulin Lispro † # (95% CI) −4.5 Fasting Serum Glucose

‡ (mg/dL), Mean Baseline 126 130 Change at Week 30 † # 5 −7 Difference from Insulin Lispro † # (95% CI) −12 * Exenatide 5 mcg BID for 1 month followed by 10 mcg BID for 5 months for the 30-week trial. † Least squares means are based on a mixed model adjusting for treatment, country, prior use of sulfonylurea (yes/no), visit, corresponding baseline, and treatment by visit interaction, where subject is treated as a random effect. # Data at 30 weeks are available from 88% and 84% of the intent-to-treat subjects in the Lispro and Exenatide groups, respectively. ‡ Patients titrated insulin glargine or insulin lispro dose to achieve prespecified target fasting and preprandial glucose concentrations. BID = twice daily. TID = three times daily.

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Exenatide?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Exenatide Prices