Exemestane Drug Information
Generic name: EXEMESTANE
Aromatase Inhibitor [EPC]
Uses of Exemestane
Adjuvant Treatment of Postmenopausal Women Exemestane tablets are indicated for adjuvant treatment
of postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive early breast cancer who have received two to three years of tamoxifen and are switched to exemestane tablets for completion of a total of five consecutive years of adjuvant hormonal therapy.
Advanced Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women Exemestane tablets are indicated for the
treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women whose disease has progressed following tamoxifen therapy.
Dosage & Administration of Exemestane
Recommended Dose
The recommended dose of exemestane tablets in early and advanced breast cancer is one 25 mg tablet once daily after a meal. adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with estrogen-receptor positive early breast cancer who have received two to three years of tamoxifen and are switched to exemestane tablets for completion of a total of five consecutive years of adjuvant hormonal therapy. the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women whose disease has progressed following tamoxifen therapy.
Dose Modifications
Concomitant use of strong CYP 3A4 inducers decreases exemestane exposure. For patients receiving exemestane tablets with a strong CYP 3A4 inducer such as rifampicin or phenytoin, the recommended dose of exemestane tablets is 50 mg once daily after a meal.
Side Effects of Exemestane
Clinical Trial Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. Adjuvant Therapy The data described below reflect exposure to exemestane tablets in 2325 postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Exemestane tablets tolerability in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer was evaluated in two well-controlled trials: the IES study and the 027 study (a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group study specifically designed to assess the effects of exemestane on bone metabolism, hormones, lipids, and coagulation factors over 2 years of treatment). The median duration of adjuvant treatment was 27.4 months and 27.3 months for patients receiving exemestane tablets or tamoxifen, respectively, within the IES study and 23.9 months for patients receiving exemestane tablets or placebo within the 027 study.
Median duration of observation after randomization for exemestane tablets was 34.5 months and for tamoxifen was 34.6 months. Median duration of observation was 30 months for both groups in the 027 study. Certain adverse reactions, which were expected based on the known pharmacological properties and side effect profiles of test drugs, were actively sought through a positive checklist.
Signs and symptoms were graded for severity using CTC in both studies. Within the IES study, the presence of some illnesses/conditions was monitored through a positive checklist without assessment of severity. These included myocardial infarction, other cardiovascular disorders, gynecological disorders, osteoporosis, osteoporotic fractures, other primary cancer, and hospitalizations.
Within the IES study, discontinuations due to adverse reactions occurred in 6% and 5% of patients receiving exemestane tablets and tamoxifen, respectively, and in 12% and 4.1% of patients receiving exemestane or placebo respectively within study 027. Deaths due to any cause were reported for 1.3% of the exemestane treated patients and 1.4% of the tamoxifen treated patients within the IES study. There were 6 deaths due to stroke on the exemestane arm compared to 2 on tamoxifen. There were 5 deaths due to cardiac failure on the exemestane arm compared to 2 on tamoxifen.
The incidence of cardiac ischemic events (myocardial infarction, angina, and myocardial ischemia) was 1.6% in exemestane treated patients and 0.6% in tamoxifen treated patients in the IES study. Cardiac failure was observed in 0.4% of exemestane treated patients and 0.3% of tamoxifen treated patients. In the adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer, the most common adverse reactions occurring in ≥10% of patients in any treatment group (exemestane tablets vs. tamoxifen) were hot flushes (21% vs. 20%), fatigue (16% vs. 15%), arthralgia (15% vs. 9%), headache (13% vs. 11%), insomnia (12% vs. 9%), and increased sweating (12% vs. 10%). Discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar between exemestane tablets and tamoxifen (6% vs. 5%). Incidences of cardiac ischemic events (myocardial infarction, angina, and myocardial ischemia) were exemestane tablets 1.6%, tamoxifen 0.6%. Incidence of cardiac failure: exemestane tablets 0.4%, tamoxifen 0.3%. Treatment-emergent adverse reactions and illnesses including all causalities and occurring with an incidence of ≥5% in either treatment group of the IES study during or within one month of the end of treatment are shown in Table 2. Table 2. Incidence (%) of Adverse Reactions of all Grades Graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria; and Illnesses Occurring in (≥5%) of Patients in Any Treatment Group in Study IES in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer % of patients Body system and Adverse Reaction by MedDRA dictionary Exemestane Tablets 25 mg daily (N=2252) Tamoxifen 20 mg daily 75 patients received tamoxifen 30 mg daily; (N=2280) Eye Visual disturbances Event actively sought. 5
Gastrointestinal Nausea 9 9 General Disorders Fatigue 16 15 Musculoskeletal Arthralgia 15
9 Pain in limb 9 6 Back pain 9 7 Osteoarthritis 6
Nervous System Headache 13 11 Dizziness 10 8 Psychiatric Insomnia 12 9
Depression 6 6 Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Increased sweating 12 10 Vascular Hot flushes 21 20 Hypertension 10 8 In the IES study, as compared to tamoxifen, exemestane tablets were associated with a higher incidence of events in musculoskeletal disorders and in nervous system disorders, including the following events occurring with frequency lower than 5% (osteoporosis, osteochondrosis and trigger finger, paresthesia, carpal tunnel syndrome, and neuropathy ). Diarrhea was also more frequent in the exemestane group (4.2% vs. 2.2%). Clinical fractures were reported in 94 patients receiving exemestane (4.2%) and 71 patients receiving tamoxifen (3.1%). After a median duration of therapy of about 30 months and a median follow-up of about 52 months, gastric ulcer was observed at a slightly higher frequency in the exemestane tablets group compared to tamoxifen (0.7% vs. <0.1%). The majority of patients on exemestane tablets with gastric ulcer received concomitant treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents and/or had a prior history. Tamoxifen was associated with a higher incidence of muscle cramps, thromboembolism, endometrial hyperplasia, and uterine polyps. Common adverse reactions occurring in study 027 are described in Table 3. Table 3. Incidence of Selected Treatment-Emergent Adverse Reactions of all CTC Grades Most events were CTC grade 1–2 Occurring in ≥5% of Patients in Either Arm in Study 027 Adverse Reaction Exemestane N=73 (% incidence) Placebo N=73 (% incidence) Hot flushes 33 25 Arthralgia 29 29 Increased sweating 18 21 Alopecia 15
Hypertension 15 7 Insomnia 14 15 Nausea 12 16 Fatigue 11 19
Abdominal pain 11 14 Depression 10 7 Diarrhea 10
Dizziness 10 10 Dermatitis 8 1.4 Headache 7 4.1 Myalgia 6 4.1
Edema 6 7 Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer A total of 1058 patients were treated with exemestane 25 mg once daily in the clinical trials program. One death was considered possibly related to treatment with exemestane; an 80-year-old woman with known coronary artery disease had a myocardial infarction with multiple organ failure after 9 weeks on study treatment. In the clinical trials program, 3% of the patients discontinued treatment with exemestane because of adverse reactions, 2.7% of patients discontinued exemestane within the first 10 weeks of treatment.
In the comparative study, adverse reactions were assessed for 358 patients treated with exemestane tablets and 400 patients treated with megestrol acetate. Fewer patients receiving exemestane tablets discontinued treatment because of adverse reactions than those treated with megestrol acetate (2% vs. 5%). Adverse reactions that were considered drug related or of indeterminate cause included hot flashes (13% vs. 5%), nausea (9% vs. 5%), fatigue (8% vs. 10%), increased sweating (4% vs. 8%), and increased appetite (3% vs. 6%) for exemestane tablets and megestrol acetate, respectively. The proportion of patients experiencing an excessive weight gain (>10% of their baseline weight) was significantly higher with megestrol acetate than with exemestane tablets (17% vs. 8%). In the treatment of advanced breast cancer, the most common adverse reactions included hot flushes (13% vs. 5%), nausea (9% vs. 5%), fatigue (8% vs. 10%), increased sweating (4% vs. 8%), and increased appetite (3% vs. 6%) for exemestane tablets and megestrol acetate, respectively.
Table 4 shows the adverse reactions of all CTC grades, regardless of causality, reported in 5% or greater of patients in the study treated either with exemestane tablets or megestrol acetate. Table 4. Incidence (%) of Adverse Reactions of all Grades Graded according to Common Toxicity Criteria and Causes Occurring in ≥5% of Advanced Breast Cancer Patients In Each Treatment Arm in the Comparative Study Body system and Adverse Reaction by WHO ART dictionary Exemesane Tablets 25 mg once daily (N=358) Megestrol Acetate 40 mg QID (N=400) Autonomic Nervous Increased sweating 6 9 Body as a Whole Fatigue 22 29 Hot flashes 13 6 Pain 13 13 Influenza-like symptoms 6 5 Edema (includes edema, peripheral edema, leg edema) 7 6 Cardiovascular Hypertension 5 6 Nervous Depression 13 9 Insomnia 11 9 Anxiety 10 11 Dizziness 8 6 Headache 8 7 Gastrointestinal Nausea 18 12 Vomiting 7 4 Abdominal pain 6 11 Anorexia 6 5 Constipation 5 8 Diarrhea 4 5 Increased appetite 3 6 Respiratory Dyspnea 10 15 Coughing 6 7 Adverse reactions of any cause (from 2% to 5%) reported in the comparative study for patients receiving exemestane tablets 25 mg once daily were fever, generalized weakness, paresthesia, pathological fracture, bronchitis, sinusitis, rash, itching, urinary tract infection, and lymphedema. Additional adverse reactions of any cause observed in the overall clinical trials program (N = 1058) in 5% or greater of patients treated with exemestane 25 mg once daily but not in the comparative study included pain at tumor sites (8%), asthenia (6%), and fever (5%). Adverse reactions of any cause reported in 2% to 5% of all patients treated with exemestane 25 mg in the overall clinical trials program but not in the comparative study included chest pain, hypoesthesia, confusion, dyspepsia, arthralgia, back pain, skeletal pain, infection, upper respiratory tract infection, pharyngitis, rhinitis, and alopecia.
Post-Marketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been identified during post approval use of exemestane tablets. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Immune system disorders - hypersensitivity Hepatobiliary disorders - hepatitis including cholestatic hepatitis Nervous system disorders- paresthesia Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder- tenosynovitis stenosans Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders- acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, urticaria, pruritus
Warnings & Cautions for Exemestane
Reductions in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Reductions in bone mineral density (BMD)
over time are seen with exemestane use. Table 1 describes changes in BMD from baseline to 24 months in patients receiving exemestane compared to patients receiving tamoxifen (IES) or placebo. Concomitant use of bisphosphonates, vitamin D supplementation, and calcium was not allowed.
Table 1. Percent Change in BMD from Baseline to 24 months, Exemestane vs. Control 1 IES 027 BMD Exemestane N=29 Tamoxifen 1 N=38 Exemestane N=59 Placebo 1 N=65 Lumbar spine (%) -3.1 -0.2 -3.5 -
Femoral neck (%) -4.2 -0.3 -4.6 -2.6 During adjuvant treatment with exemestane
women with osteoporosis or at risk of osteoporosis should have their bone mineral density formally assessed by bone densitometry at the commencement of treatment. Monitor patients for bone mineral density loss and treat as appropriate.
Vitamin D Assessment Routine assessment of 25-hydroxy vitamin D levels prior to
the start of aromatase inhibitor treatment should be performed, due to the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in women with early breast cancer (EBC). Women with vitamin D deficiency should receive supplementation with vitamin D.
Administration with Estrogen-Containing Agents Exemestane tablets should not be coadministered with systemic
estrogen-containing agents as these could interfere with its pharmacologic action.
Laboratory Abnormalities
In patients with early breast cancer, the incidence of hematological abnormalities of Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade ≥1 was lower in the exemestane treatment group, compared with tamoxifen. Incidence of CTC grade 3 or 4 abnormalities was low (approximately 0.1%) in both treatment groups. Approximately 20% of patients receiving exemestane in clinical studies in advanced breast cancer experienced CTC grade 3 or 4 lymphocytopenia.
Of these patients, 89% had a pre-existing lower grade lymphopenia. Forty percent of patients either recovered or improved to a lesser severity while on treatment. Patients did not have a significant increase in viral infections, and no opportunistic infections were observed.
Elevations of serum levels of AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma glutamyl transferase >5 times the upper value of the normal range (i.e., ≥ CTC grade 3) have been rarely reported in patients treated for advanced breast cancer but appear mostly attributable to the underlying presence of liver and/or bone metastases. In the comparative study in advanced breast cancer patients, CTC grade 3 or 4 elevation of gamma glutamyl transferase without documented evidence of liver metastasis was reported in 2.7% of patients treated with exemestane tablets and in 1.8% of patients treated with megestrol acetate. In patients with early breast cancer, elevations in bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, and creatinine were more common in those receiving exemestane than either tamoxifen or placebo.
Treatment-emergent bilirubin elevations (any CTC grade) occurred in 5% of exemestane patients and 0.8% of tamoxifen patients on the Intergroup Exemestane Study (IES), and in 7% of exemestane treated patients vs. 0% of placebo treated patients in the 027 study. CTC grade 3–4 increases in bilirubin occurred in 0.9% of exemestane treated patients compared to 0.1% of tamoxifen treated patients. Alkaline phosphatase elevations of any CTC grade occurred in 15% of exemestane treated patients on the IES compared to 2.6% of tamoxifen treated patients, and in 14% of exemestane treated patients compared to 7% of placebo treated patients in study 027. Creatinine elevations occurred in 6% of exemestane treated patients and 4.3% of tamoxifen treated patients on the IES and in 6% of exemestane treated patients and 0% of placebo treated patients in study 027.
Use in Premenopausal Women Exemestane tablets are not indicated for the treatment
of breast cancer in premenopausal women.
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Based on findings from animal studies and its mechanism of action, exemestane tablets can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. In animal reproduction studies, administration of exemestane to pregnant rats and rabbits caused increased incidence of abortions and embryo-fetal toxicity. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus.
Advise females of reproductive potential to use effective contraception during treatment with exemestane tablets and for 1 month after the last dose .
Drug Interactions with Exemestane
Strong CYP 3A4 inducers: Concomitant use of strong CYP 3A4 inducers decreases exemestane exposure. Increase the exemestane tablets dose to 50 mg. Drugs That Induce CYP 3A4 Co-medications that induce CYP 3A4 (e.g., rifampicin, phenytoin, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or St.
John's Wort) may significantly decrease exposure to exemestane. Dose modification is recommended for patients who are also receiving a strong CYP 3A4 inducer .
Pregnancy Safety for Exemestane
Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on findings in animal studies and its mechanism of action, exemestane tablets can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman . Limited human data from case reports are insufficient to inform a drug-associated risk. In animal reproduction studies, administration of exemestane to pregnant rats and rabbits caused increased incidence of abortions, embryo-fetal toxicity, and prolonged gestation with abnormal or difficult labor . Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown.
In the US general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. Data Animal Data In animal reproduction studies in rats and rabbits, exemestane caused embryo-fetal toxicity, and was abortifacient. Radioactivity related to 14 C-exemestane crossed the placenta of rats following oral administration of 1 mg/kg exemestane.
The concentration of exemestane and its metabolites was approximately equivalent in maternal and fetal blood. When rats were administered exemestane from 14 days prior to mating until either days 15 or 20 of gestation, and resuming for the 21 days of lactation, an increase in placental weight was seen at 4 mg/kg/day (approximately 1.5 times the recommended human daily dose on a mg/m 2 basis). Increased resorptions, reduced number of live fetuses, decreased fetal weight, retarded ossification, prolonged gestation and abnormal or difficult labor was observed at doses equal to or greater than 20 mg/kg/day (approximately 7.5 times the recommended human daily dose on a mg/m 2 basis). Daily doses of exemestane, given to rabbits during organogenesis, caused a decrease in placental weight at 90 mg/kg/day (approximately 70 times the recommended human daily dose on a mg/m 2 basis) and in the presence of maternal toxicity, abortions, an increase in resorptions, and a reduction in fetal body weight were seen at 270 mg/kg/day. No malformations were noted when exemestane was administered to pregnant rats or rabbits during the organogenesis period at doses up to 810 and 270 mg/kg/day, respectively (approximately 320 and 210 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis, respectively).
Pediatric Use of Exemestane
Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.
Contraindications for Exemestane
Exemestane tablets are contraindicated in patients with a known hypersensitivity to the drug or to any of the excipients. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to the drug or to any of the excipients.
Overdosage Information for Exemestane
Clinical trials have been conducted with exemestane given as a single dose to healthy female volunteers at doses as high as 800 mg and daily for 12 weeks to postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer at doses as high as 600 mg. These dosages were well tolerated. There is no specific antidote to overdosage and treatment must be symptomatic.
General supportive care, including frequent monitoring of vital signs and close observation of the patient, is indicated. A male child (age unknown) accidentally ingested a 25-mg tablet of exemestane. The initial physical examination was normal, but blood tests performed 1 hour after ingestion indicated leucocytosis (WBC 25000/mm 3 with 90% neutrophils). Blood tests were repeated 4 days after the incident and were normal.
No treatment was given. In mice, mortality was observed after a single oral dose of exemestane of 3200 mg/kg, the lowest dose tested (about 640 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis). In rats and dogs, mortality was observed after single oral doses of exemestane of 5000 mg/kg (about 2000 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis) and of 3000 mg/kg (about 4000 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis), respectively. Convulsions were observed after single doses of exemestane of 400 mg/kg and 3000 mg/kg in mice and dogs (approximately 80 and 4000 times the recommended human dose on a mg/m 2 basis), respectively.
Clinical Studies of Exemestane
Adjuvant Treatment in Early Breast Cancer
The Intergroup Exemestane Study 031 (IES) was a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, multinational study comparing exemestane (25 mg/day) vs. tamoxifen (20 or 30 mg/day) in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Patients who remained disease-free after receiving adjuvant tamoxifen therapy for 2 to 3 years were randomized to receive an additional 3 or 2 years of exemestane tablets or tamoxifen to complete a total of 5 years of hormonal therapy. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether, in terms of disease-free survival, it was more effective to switch to exemestane tablets rather than continuing tamoxifen therapy for the remainder of five years.
Disease- free survival was defined as the time from randomization to time of local or distant recurrence of breast cancer, contralateral invasive breast cancer, or death from any cause. The secondary objectives were to compare the two regimens in terms of overall survival and long-term tolerability. Time to contralateral invasive breast cancer and distant recurrence-free survival were also evaluated.
A total of 4724 patients in the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis were randomized to exemestane tablets 25 mg once daily (N = 2352) or to continue to receive tamoxifen once daily at the same dose received before randomization (N = 2372). Demographics and baseline tumor characteristics are presented in Table 5. Prior breast cancer therapy is summarized in Table 6. Table 5. Demographic and Baseline Tumor Characteristics from the IES Study of Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer (ITT Population) Parameter Exemestane (N = 2352) Tamoxifen (N = 2372) Age (years): Median age (range) 63.0 (38.0 – 96.0) 63.0 (31.0 – 90.0) Race, n (%): Caucasian 2315 2333 Hispanic 13 13 Asian 10 9 Black 7 10 Other/not reported 7 7 Nodal status, n (%): Negative 1217 1228 Positive 1051 1044 1–3 Positive nodes 721 708 4–9 Positive nodes 239 244 >9 Positive nodes 88 86 Not reported 3 6 Unknown or missing 84 100 Histologic type, n (%): Infiltrating ductal 1777 1830 Infiltrating lobular 341 321 Other 231 213 Unknown or missing 3 8 Receptor status Results for receptor status include the results of the post-randomization testing of specimens from subjects for whom receptor status was unknown at randomization., n (%): ER and PgR Positive 1331 1319 ER Positive and PgR Negative/Unknown 677 692 ER Unknown and PgR Positive Only one subject in the exemestane group had unknown ER status and positive PgR status. /Unknown 288 291 ER Negative and PgR Positive 6 7 ER Negative and PgR Negative/Unknown (none positive) 48 58 Missing 2 5 Tumor Size, n (%): ≤ 0.5 cm 58 46 > 0.5 – 1.0 cm 315 302 > 1.0 – 2 cm 1031 1033 > 2.0 – 5.0 cm 833 883 > 5.0 cm 62 59 Not reported 53 49 Tumor Grade, n (%): G1 397 393 G2 977 1007 G3 454 428 G4 23 19 Unknown/Not Assessed/Not reported 501 525 Table 6. Prior Breast Cancer Therapy of Patients in the IES Study of Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer (ITT Population) Parameter Exemestane (N = 2352) Tamoxifen (N = 2372) Type of surgery, n (%): Mastectomy 1232 1242 Breast-conserving 1116 1123 Unknown or missing 4 7 Radiotherapy to the breast, n (%): Yes 1524 1523 No 824 843 Not reported 4 6 Prior therapy, n (%): Chemotherapy 774 769 Hormone replacement therapy 567 561 Bisphosphonates 43 34 Duration of tamoxifen therapy at randomization (months): Median (range) 28.5 (15.8 – 52.2) 28.4 (15.6 – 63.0) Tamoxifen dose, n (%): 20 mg 2270 2287 30 mg The 30 mg dose was used only in Denmark, where this dose was the standard of care. 78 75 Not reported 4 10 After a median duration of therapy of 27 months and with a median follow-up of 34.5 months, 520 events were reported, 213 in the exemestane tablets group and 307 in the tamoxifen group (Table 7). Table 7. Primary Endpoint Events (ITT Population) Event First Events N (%) Exemestane (N = 2352) Tamoxifen (N = 2372) Loco-regional recurrence 34 45 Distant recurrence 126 183 Second primary – contralateral breast cancer 7 25 Death – breast cancer 1 6 Death – other reason 41 43 Death – missing/unknown 3 5 Ipsilateral breast cancer 1 0 Total number of events 213 307 Disease-free survival in the intent-to-treat population was statistically significantly improved in the exemestane tablets arm compared to the tamoxifen arm. In the hormone receptor-positive subpopulation representing about 85% of the trial patients, disease-free survival was also statistically significantly improved (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.79, P = 0.00001) in the exemestane tablets arm compared to the tamoxifen arm. Consistent results were observed in the subgroups of patients with node negative or positive disease, and patients who had or had not received prior chemotherapy.
An overall survival update at 119 months median follow-up showed no significant difference between the two groups, with 467 deaths (19.9%) occurring in the exemestane tablets group and 510 deaths (21.5%) in the tamoxifen group. Table 8. Efficacy Results from the IES Study in Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer ITT Population Hazard Ratio (95% CI) p-value (log-rank test) Disease-free survival 0.69 (0.58–0.82) 0.00003 Time to contralateral breast cancer 0.32 (0.15–0.72) 0.00340 Distant recurrence-free survival 0.74 (0.62–0.90) 0.00207 Overall survival 0.91 (0.81–1.04) 0.16 Not adjusted for multiple testing. ER and/or PgR positive Disease-free survival 0.65 (0.53–0.79) 0.00001 Time to contralateral breast cancer 0.22 (0.08–0.57) 0.00069 Distant recurrence-free survival 0.73 (0.59–0.90) 0.00367 Overall survival 0.89 (0.78–1.02) 0.09065 Figure 1. Disease-Free Survival in the IES Study of Postmenopausal Women with Early Breast Cancer (ITT Population)
Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer Exemestane 25 mg administered once daily was
evaluated in a randomized double-blind, multicenter, multinational comparative study and in two multicenter single-arm studies of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer who had disease progression after treatment with tamoxifen for metastatic disease or as adjuvant therapy. Some patients also have received prior cytotoxic therapy, either as adjuvant treatment or for metastatic disease. The primary purpose of the three studies was evaluation of objective response rate (complete response and partial response ). Time to tumor progression and overall survival were also assessed in the comparative trial.
Response rates were assessed based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, and in the comparative study, were submitted to an external review committee that was blinded to patient treatment. In the comparative study, 769 patients were randomized to receive exemestane tablets 25 mg once daily (N = 366) or megestrol acetate 40 mg four times daily (N = 403). Demographics and baseline characteristics are presented in Table 9. Table 9. Demographics and Baseline Characteristics from the Comparative Study of Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer Whose Disease Had Progressed after Tamoxifen Therapy Parameter Exemestane Tablets (N = 366) Megestrol Acetate (N = 403) Median Age (range) 65 (35–89) 65 (30–91) ECOG Performance Status 0 167 (46%) 187 (46%) 1 162 (44%) 172 (43%) 2 34 (9%) 42 (10%) Receptor Status ER and/or PgR + 246 (67%) 274 (68%) ER and PgR unknown 116 (32%) 128 (32%) Responders to prior tamoxifen 68 (19%) 85 (21%) NE for response to prior tamoxifen 46 (13%) 41 (10%) Site of Metastasis Visceral ± other sites 207 (57%) 239 (59%) Bone only 61 (17%) 73 (18%) Soft tissue only 54 (15%) 51 (13%) Bone & soft tissue 43 (12%) 38 (9%) Measurable Disease 287 (78%) 314 (78%) Prior Tamoxifen Therapy Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant 145 (40%) 152 (38%) Advanced Disease, Outcome CR, PR, or SD ≥ 6 months 179 (49%) 210 (52%) SD < 6 months, PD or NE 42 (12%) 41 (10%) Prior Chemotherapy For advanced disease ± adjuvant 58 (16%) 67 (17%) Adjuvant only 104 (28%) 108 (27%) No chemotherapy 203 (56%) 226 (56%) The efficacy results from the comparative study are shown in Table 10. The objective response rates observed in the two treatment arms showed that exemestane tablets was not different from megestrol acetate. Response rates for exemestane tablets from the two single-arm trials were 23.4% and 28.1%. Table 10. Efficacy Results from the Comparative Study of Postmenopausal Women with Advanced Breast Cancer Whose Disease Had Progressed after Tamoxifen Therapy Response Characteristics Exemestane Tablets (N=366) Megestrol Acetate (N=403) Abbreviations: CR = complete response, PR = partial response, SD = stable disease (no change), TTP = time to tumor progression, C.I. = confidence interval, MA = megestrol acetate, ET = exemestane tablets Objective Response Rate = CR + PR (%) 15.0
Difference in Response Rate (ET-MA) 2.6 95% C.I. 7.5, -2.3 CR (%)
2.2
PR (%) 12.8 11.2 SD ≥ 24 Weeks (%) 21.3 21.1 Median
Duration of Response (weeks) 76.1
Median
TTP (weeks) 20.3
Hazard ratio (ET-MA) 0.84
There were too few deaths occurring across treatment groups to draw conclusions on overall survival differences. The Kaplan-Meier curve for time to tumor progression in the comparative study is shown in Figure 2. Figure 2. Time to Tumor Progression in the Comparative Study of Postmenopausal Women With Advanced Breast Cancer Whose Disease Had Progressed After Tamoxifen Therapy
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Exemestane?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Exemestane Prices