Epivir Drug Information

Generic name: LAMIVUDINE

Hepatitis B Virus Nucleoside Analog Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor [EPC] Human Immunodeficiency Virus Nucleoside Analog Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor [EPC]

Save on Epivir at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Epivir

  • is a nucleoside analogue indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV‑1) infection. Limitations of Use:
  • The dosage of this product is for HIV‑1 and not for HBV. EPIVIR is a nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV‑1 infection. Limitations of Use: The dosage of this product is for HIV‑1 and not for HBV. ( 1 )

Dosage & Administration of Epivir

a Data regarding the efficacy of once-daily dosing is limited to subjects who transitioned from twice-daily dosing to once-daily dosing after 36 weeks of treatment [see Clinical Studies (14.2)]. b Patients may alternatively take one 300-mg tablet, which is not scored.
Weight(kg)Once-Daily Dosing Regimena
AM DosePM Dose
14 to <201 tablet (150 mg)
≥20 to <251½ tablets (225 mg)
≥252 tablets (300 mg)b

Side Effects of Epivir

  • The following adverse reactions are discussed in other sections of the labeling:
  • Exacerbations of hepatitis B [see Boxed Warning , Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )].
  • Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2 )] .
  • Pancreatitis [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )].
  • Immune reconstitution syndrome [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.4 )] .
  • The most common reported adverse reactions (incidence greater than or equal to 15%) in adults were headache, nausea, malaise and fatigue, nasal signs and symptoms, diarrhea, and cough. ( 6.1 )
  • The most common reported adverse reactions (incidence greater than or equal to 15%) in pediatric subjects were fever and cough. ( 6.1 ) To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS, contact ViiV Healthcare at 1-877-844-8872 or FDA at 1-800-FDA-1088 or www.fda.gov/medwatch . 6.1 Clinical Trials Experience Clinical Trials Experience in Adult Subjects Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared with rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. The safety profile of EPIVIR in adults is primarily based on 3,568 HIV-1–infected subjects in 7 clinical trials. The most common adverse reactions are headache, nausea, malaise, fatigue, nasal signs and symptoms, diarrhea, and cough. Selected clinical adverse reactions in greater than or equal to 5% of subjects during therapy with EPIVIR 150 mg twice daily plus RETROVIR 200 mg 3 times daily for up to 24 weeks are listed in Table 3 . Table 3. Selected Clinical Adverse Reactions (Greater than or Equal to 5% Frequency) in Four Controlled Clinical Trials (NUCA3001, NUCA3002, NUCB3001, NUCB3002) a Either zidovudine monotherapy or zidovudine in combination with zalcitabine. Adverse Reaction EPIVIR 150 mg Twice Daily plus RETROVIR (n = 251) RETROVIR a (n = 230) Body as a Whole Headache 35% 27% Malaise & fatigue 27% 23% Fever or chills 10% 12% Digestive Nausea 33% 29% Diarrhea 18% 22% Nausea & vomiting 13% 12% Anorexia and/or decreased appetite 10% 7% Abdominal pain 9% 11% Abdominal cramps 6% 3% Dyspepsia 5% 5% Nervous System Neuropathy 12% 10% Insomnia & other sleep disorders 11% 7% Dizziness 10% 4% Depressive disorders 9% 4% Respiratory Nasal signs & symptoms 20% 11% Cough 18% 13% Skin Skin rashes 9% 6% Musculoskeletal Musculoskeletal pain 12% 10% Myalgia 8% 6% Arthralgia 5% 5% Pancreatitis: Pancreatitis was observed in 9 out of 2,613 adult subjects (0.3%) who received EPIVIR in controlled clinical trials EPV20001, NUCA3001, NUCB3001, NUCA3002, NUCB3002, and NUCB3007 [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. EPIVIR 300 mg Once Daily: The types and frequencies of clinical adverse reactions reported in subjects receiving EPIVIR 300 mg once daily or EPIVIR 150 mg twice daily (in 3-drug combination regimens in EPV20001 and EPV40001) for 48 weeks were similar. Selected laboratory abnormalities observed during therapy are summarized in Table 4 . Table 4. Frequencies of Selected Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities in Adults in Four 24-Week Surrogate Endpoint Trials (NUCA3001, NUCA3002, NUCB3001, NUCB3002) and a Clinical Endpoint Trial (NUCB3007) a The median duration on study was 12 months. b Either zidovudine monotherapy or zidovudine in combination with zalcitabine. c Current therapy was either zidovudine, zidovudine plus didanosine, or zidovudine plus zalcitabine. ULN = Upper limit of normal. ND = Not done. Test (Threshold Level) 24-Week Surrogate Endpoint Trials a Clinical Endpoint Trial a EPIVIR plus RETROVIR RETROVIR b EPIVIR plus Current Therapy c Placebo plus Current Therapy c Absolute neutrophil count (<750/mm 3 ) 7.2% 5.4% 15% 13% Hemoglobin (<8.0 g/dL) 2.9% 1.8% 2.2% 3.4% Platelets (<50,000/mm 3 ) 0.4% 1.3% 2.8% 3.8% ALT (>5.0 x ULN) 3.7% 3.6% 3.8% 1.9% AST (>5.0 x ULN) 1.7% 1.8% 4.0% 2.1% Bilirubin (>2.5 x ULN) 0.8% 0.4% ND ND Amylase (>2.0 x ULN) 4.2% 1.5% 2.2% 1.1% The frequencies of selected laboratory abnormalities reported in subjects receiving EPIVIR 300 mg once daily or EPIVIR 150 mg twice daily (in 3-drug combination regimens in EPV20001 and EPV40001) were similar. Clinical Trials Experience in Pediatric Subjects EPIVIR oral solution has been studied in 638 pediatric subjects aged 3 months to 18 years in 3 clinical trials. Selected clinical adverse reactions and physical findings with a greater than or equal to 5% frequency during therapy with EPIVIR 4 mg per kg twice daily plus RETROVIR 160 mg per m 2 3 times daily in therapy-naive (less than or equal to 56 days of antiretroviral therapy) pediatric subjects are listed in Table 5 . Table 5. Selected Clinical Adverse Reactions and Physical Findings (Greater than or Equal to 5% Frequency) in Pediatric Subjects in Trial ACTG300 a Includes pain, discharge, erythema, or swelling of an ear. Adverse Reaction EPIVIR plus RETROVIR (n = 236) Didanosine (n = 235) Body as a Whole Fever 25% 32% Digestive Hepatomegaly 11% 11% Nausea & vomiting 8% 7% Diarrhea 8% 6% Stomatitis 6% 12% Splenomegaly 5% 8% Respiratory Cough 15% 18% Abnormal breath sounds/wheezing 7% 9% Ear, Nose, and Throat Signs or symptoms of ears a 7% 6% Nasal discharge or congestion 8% 11% Other Skin rashes 12% 14% Lymphadenopathy 9% 11% Pancreatitis: Pancreatitis, which has been fatal in some cases, has been observed in antiretroviral nucleoside‑experienced pediatric subjects receiving EPIVIR alone or in combination with other antiretroviral agents. In an open‑label dose‑escalation trial (NUCA2002), 14 subjects (14%) developed pancreatitis while receiving monotherapy with EPIVIR. Three of these subjects died of complications of pancreatitis. In a second open‑label trial (NUCA2005), 12 subjects (18%) developed pancreatitis. In Trial ACTG300, pancreatitis was not observed in 236 subjects randomized to EPIVIR plus RETROVIR. Pancreatitis was observed in 1 subject in this trial who received open‑label EPIVIR in combination with RETROVIR and ritonavir following discontinuation of didanosine monotherapy [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.3 )]. Paresthesias and Peripheral Neuropathies: Paresthesias and peripheral neuropathies were reported in 15 subjects (15%) in Trial NUCA2002, 6 subjects (9%) in Trial NUCA2005, and 2 subjects (less than 1%) in Trial ACTG300. Selected laboratory abnormalities experienced by therapy‑naive (less than or equal to 56 days of antiretroviral therapy) pediatric subjects are listed in Table 6 . Table 6. Frequencies of Selected Grade 3-4 Laboratory Abnormalities in Pediatric Subjects in Trial ACTG300 ULN = Upper limit of normal. Test (Threshold Level) EPIVIR plus RETROVIR Didanosine Absolute neutrophil count (<400/mm 3 ) 8% 3% Hemoglobin (<7.0 g/dL) 4% 2% Platelets (<50,000/mm 3 ) 1% 3% ALT (>10 x ULN) 1% 3% AST (>10 x ULN) 2% 4% Lipase (>2.5 x ULN) 3% 3% Total Amylase (>2.5 x ULN) 3% 3% Pediatric Subjects Once-Daily versus Twice-Daily Dosing (COL105677): The safety of once-daily compared with twice-daily dosing of EPIVIR was assessed in the ARROW trial. Primary safety assessment in the ARROW trial was based on Grade 3 and Grade 4 adverse events. The frequency of Grade 3 and 4 adverse events was similar among subjects randomized to once-daily dosing compared with subjects randomized to twice-daily dosing. One event of Grade 4 hepatitis in the once-daily cohort was considered as uncertain causality by the investigator and all other Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were considered not related by the investigator. Neonates: Limited short-term safety information is available from 2 small, uncontrolled trials in South Africa in neonates receiving lamivudine with or without zidovudine for the first week of life following maternal treatment starting at Week 38 or 36 of gestation [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] . Selected adverse reactions reported in these neonates included increased liver function tests, anemia, diarrhea, electrolyte disturbances, hypoglycemia, jaundice and hepatomegaly, rash, respiratory infections, and sepsis; 3 neonates died (1 from gastroenteritis with acidosis and convulsions, 1 from traumatic injury, and 1 from unknown causes). Two other nonfatal gastroenteritis or diarrhea cases were reported, including 1 with convulsions; 1 infant had transient renal insufficiency associated with dehydration. The absence of control groups limits assessments of causality, but it should be assumed that perinatally exposed infants may be at risk for adverse reactions comparable to those reported in pediatric and adult HIV-1–infected patients treated with lamivudine-containing combination regimens. Long-term effects of in utero and infant lamivudine exposure are not known. 6.2 Postmarketing Experience The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of EPIVIR. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of unknown size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. These reactions have been chosen for inclusion due to a combination of their seriousness, frequency of reporting, or potential causal connection to lamivudine. Body as a Whole Redistribution/accumulation of body fat . Endocrine and Metabolic Hyperglycemia. General Weakness. Hemic and Lymphatic Anemia (including pure red cell aplasia and severe anemias progressing on therapy). Hepatic and Pancreatic Lactic acidosis and hepatic steatosis [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.2 )] , posttreatment exacerbations of hepatitis B [see Warnings and Precautions ( 5.1 )]. Hypersensitivity Anaphylaxis, urticaria. Musculoskeletal Muscle weakness, CPK elevation, rhabdomyolysis. Skin Alopecia, pruritus.

Warnings & Cautions for Epivir

  • Co-infected HIV‑1/HBV Patients: Emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV variants associated with lamivudine‑containing antiretroviral regimens has been reported. ( 5.1 )
  • Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogues. ( 5.2 )
  • Pancreatitis: Use with caution in pediatric patients with a history of pancreatitis or other significant risk factors for pancreatitis. Discontinue treatment as clinically appropriate. ( 5.3 )
  • Immune reconstitution syndrome has been reported in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy. ( 5.4 )
  • Lower virologic suppression rates and increased risk of viral resistance were observed in pediatric subjects who received EPIVIR oral solution concomitantly with other antiretroviral oral solutions compared with those who received tablets. An all-tablet regimen should be used when possible. ( 5.5 ) 5.1 Patients with Hepatitis B Virus Co-Infection Posttreatment Exacerbations of Hepatitis Clinical and laboratory evidence of exacerbations of hepatitis have occurred after discontinuation of lamivudine. These exacerbations have been detected primarily by serum ALT elevations in addition to re‑emergence of HBV DNA. Although most events appear to have been self‑limited, fatalities have been reported in some cases. Similar events have been reported from postmarketing experience after changes from lamivudine‑containing HIV‑1 treatment regimens to non‑lamivudine–containing regimens in patients infected with both HIV‑1 and HBV. The causal relationship to discontinuation of lamivudine treatment is unknown. Patients should be closely monitored with both clinical and laboratory follow‑up for at least several months after stopping treatment. Important Differences among Lamivudine ‑ Containing Products EPIVIR tablets and oral solution contain a higher dose of the same active ingredient (lamivudine) than EPIVIR‑HBV tablets and EPIVIR‑HBV oral solution. EPIVIR‑HBV was developed for patients with chronic hepatitis B. The formulation and dosage of lamivudine in EPIVIR‑HBV are not appropriate for patients co-infected with HIV‑1 and HBV. Safety and efficacy of lamivudine have not been established for treatment of chronic hepatitis B in patients co‑infected with HIV‑1 and HBV. If treatment with EPIVIR‑HBV is prescribed for chronic hepatitis B for a patient with unrecognized or untreated HIV-1 infection, rapid emergence of HIV‑1 resistance is likely to result because of the subtherapeutic dose and the inappropriateness of monotherapy HIV‑1 treatment. If a decision is made to administer lamivudine to patients co‑infected with HIV‑1 and HBV, EPIVIR tablets, EPIVIR oral solution, or another product containing the higher dose of lamivudine should be used as part of an appropriate combination regimen. Emergence of Lamivudine-Resistant HBV Safety and efficacy of lamivudine have not been established for treatment of chronic hepatitis B in subjects dually infected with HIV-1 and HBV (see full prescribing information for EPIVIR-HBV). Emergence of hepatitis B virus variants associated with resistance to lamivudine has also been reported in HIV-1–infected subjects who have received lamivudine-containing antiretroviral regimens in the presence of concurrent infection with hepatitis B virus. 5.2 Lactic Acidosis and Severe Hepatomegaly with Steatosis Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogues, including EPIVIR. A majority of these cases have been in women. Female sex and obesity may be risk factors for the development of lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly with steatosis in patients treated with antiretroviral nucleoside analogues. Treatment with EPIVIR should be suspended in any patient who develops clinical or laboratory findings suggestive of lactic acidosis or pronounced hepatotoxicity, which may include hepatomegaly and steatosis even in the absence of marked transaminase elevations. 5.3 Pancreatitis In pediatric patients with a history of prior antiretroviral nucleoside exposure, a history of pancreatitis, or other significant risk factors for the development of pancreatitis, EPIVIR should be used with caution. Treatment with EPIVIR should be stopped immediately if clinical signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities suggestive of pancreatitis occur [see Adverse Reactions ( 6.1 )] . 5.4 Immune Reconstitution Syndrome Immune reconstitution syndrome has been reported in patients treated with combination antiretroviral therapy, including EPIVIR. During the initial phase of combination antiretroviral treatment, patients whose immune systems respond may develop an inflammatory response to indolent or residual opportunistic infections (such as Mycobacterium avium infection, cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia [PCP], or tuberculosis), which may necessitate further evaluation and treatment. Autoimmune disorders (such as Graves’ disease, polymyositis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome) have also been reported to occur in the setting of immune reconstitution, however, the time to onset is more variable, and can occur many months after initiation of treatment. 5.5 Lower Virologic Suppression Rates and Increased Risk of Viral Resistance with Oral Solution Pediatric subjects who received EPIVIR oral solution (at weight band-based doses approximating 8 mg per kg per day) concomitantly with other antiretroviral oral solutions at any time in the ARROW trial had lower rates of virologic suppression, lower plasma lamivudine exposure, and developed viral resistance more frequently than those receiving EPIVIR tablets [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 ), Microbiology ( 12.4 ), Clinical Studies ( 14.2 )] . EPIVIR scored tablet is the preferred formulation for HIV-1‑infected pediatric patients who weigh at least 14 kg and for whom a solid dosage form is appropriate. An all-tablet regimen should be used when possible to avoid a potential interaction with sorbitol [see Clinical Pharmacology ( 12.3 )] . Consider more frequent monitoring of HIV-1 viral load when treating with EPIVIR oral solution.

Drug Interactions with Epivir

Drugs Inhibiting Organic Cation Transporters Lamivudine is predominantly eliminated in the urine

by active organic cationic secretion. The possibility of interactions with other drugs administered concurrently should be considered, particularly when their main route of elimination is active renal secretion via the organic cationic transport system (e.g., trimethoprim) . No data are available regarding interactions with other drugs that have renal clearance mechanisms similar to that of lamivudine.

Sorbitol Coadministration of single doses of lamivudine and sorbitol resulted in a

sorbitol dose-dependent reduction in lamivudine exposures. When possible, avoid use of sorbitol-containing medicines with lamivudine .

Pregnancy Safety for Epivir

Pregnancy Pregnancy Exposure Registry There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to EPIVIR during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients by calling the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR) at 1-800-258-4263. Risk Summary Available data from the APR show no difference in the overall risk of birth defects for lamivudine compared with the background rate for birth defects of 2.7% in the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP) reference population (see Data). The APR uses the MACDP as the U.S. reference population for birth defects in the general population. The MACDP evaluates women and infants from a limited geographic area and does not include outcomes for births that occurred at less than 20 weeks’ gestation.

The rate of miscarriage is not reported in the APR. The estimated background rate of miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies in the U.S. general population is 15% to 20%. The background risk for major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. In animal reproduction studies, oral administration of lamivudine to pregnant rabbits during organogenesis resulted in embryolethality at systemic exposure (AUC) similar to the recommended clinical dose; however, no adverse development effects were observed with oral administration of lamivudine to pregnant rats during organogenesis at plasma concentrations (C max ) 35 times the recommended clinical dose ( see Data ). Data Human Data: Based on prospective reports to the APR of over 11,000 exposures to lamivudine during pregnancy resulting in live births (including over 4,500 exposed in the first trimester), there was no difference between the overall risk of birth defects for lamivudine compared with the background birth defect rate of 2.7% in the U.S. reference population of the MACDP. The prevalence of defects in live births was 3.1% (95% CI: 2.6% to 3.6%) following first trimester exposure to lamivudine-containing regimens and 2.8% (95% CI: 2.5% to 3.3%) following second/third trimester exposure to lamivudine-containing regimens. Lamivudine pharmacokinetics were studied in pregnant women during 2 clinical trials conducted in South Africa.

The trials assessed pharmacokinetics in 16 women at 36 weeks’ gestation using 150 mg lamivudine twice daily with zidovudine, 10 women at 38 weeks’ gestation using 150 mg lamivudine twice daily with zidovudine, and 10 women at 38 weeks’ gestation using lamivudine 300 mg twice daily without other antiretrovirals. These trials were not designed or powered to provide efficacy information. Lamivudine concentrations were generally similar in maternal, neonatal, and umbilical cord serum samples.

In a subset of subjects, amniotic fluid specimens were collected following natural rupture of membranes and confirmed that lamivudine crosses the placenta in humans. Based on limited data at delivery, median (range) amniotic fluid concentrations of lamivudine were 3.9 (1.2 to 12.8)–fold greater compared with paired maternal serum concentration (n = 8). Animal Data: Lamivudine was administered orally to pregnant rats (at 90, 600, and 4,000 mg per kg per day) and rabbits (at 90, 300, and 1,000 mg per kg per day and at 15, 40, and 90 mg per kg per day) during organogenesis (on Gestation Days 7 through 16 and 8 through 20 ). No evidence of fetal malformations due to lamivudine was observed in rats and rabbits at doses producing plasma concentrations (C max ) approximately 35 times higher than human exposure at the recommended daily dose. Evidence of early embryolethality was seen in the rabbit at system exposures (AUC) similar to those observed in humans, but there was no indication of this effect in the rat at plasma concentrations (C max ) 35 times higher than human exposure at the recommended daily dose.

Studies in pregnant rats showed that lamivudine is transferred to the fetus through the placenta. In the fertility/pre-and postnatal development study in rats, lamivudine was administered orally at doses of 180, 900, and 4,000 mg per kg per day (from prior to mating through postnatal Day 20). In the study, development of the offspring, including fertility and reproductive performance, was not affected by maternal administration of lamivudine.

Pediatric Use of Epivir

Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of EPIVIR in combination with other antiretroviral agents have been established in pediatric patients aged 3 months and older. EPIVIR scored tablet is the preferred formulation for HIV-1‑infected pediatric patients who weigh at least 14 kg and for whom a solid dosage form is appropriate because pediatric subjects who received EPIVIR oral solution had lower rates of virologic suppression, lower plasma lamivudine exposure, and developed viral resistance more frequently than those receiving EPIVIR tablets in the ARROW trial .

Contraindications for Epivir

is contraindicated in patients with a previous hypersensitivity reaction to lamivudine. EPIVIR is contraindicated in patients with previous hypersensitivity reaction to lamivudine.

Overdosage Information for Epivir

There is no known specific treatment for overdose with EPIVIR. If overdose occurs, the patient should be monitored and standard supportive treatment applied as required. Because a negligible amount of lamivudine was removed via (4-hour) hemodialysis, continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis, and automated peritoneal dialysis, it is not known if continuous hemodialysis would provide clinical benefit in a lamivudine overdose event.

Clinical Studies of Epivir

Adult Subjects Clinical Endpoint Trial

NUCB3007 (CAESAR) was a multicenter, double‑blind, placebo-controlled trial comparing continued current therapy (zidovudine alone or zidovudine with didanosine or zalcitabine ) to the addition of EPIVIR or EPIVIR plus an investigational non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), randomized 1:2:1. A total of 1,816 HIV-1–infected adults with 25 to 250 CD4+ cells per mm 3 (median = 122 cells per mm 3 ) at baseline were enrolled: median age was 36 years, 87% were male, 84% were nucleoside-experienced, and 16% were therapy-naive. The median duration on trial was 12 months. Results are summarized in Table 9. Table 9. Number of Subjects (%) with at Least One HIV-1 Disease Progression Event or Death a An investigational non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor not approved in the United States.

Endpoint Current Therapy (n = 460) EPIVIR plus Current Therapy (n = 896) EPIVIR plus an NNRTI a plus Current Therapy (n = 460) HIV-1 progression or death 90 (19.6%) 86 (9.6%) 41 (8.9%) Death 27 (5.9%) 23 (2.6%) 14 (3.0%) Surrogate Endpoint Trials Dual Nucleoside Analogue Trials: Principal clinical trials in the initial development of lamivudine compared lamivudine/zidovudine combinations with zidovudine monotherapy or with zidovudine plus zalcitabine. These trials demonstrated the antiviral effect of lamivudine in a 2-drug combination. More recent uses of lamivudine in treatment of HIV-1 infection incorporate it into multiple-drug regimens containing at least 3 antiretroviral drugs for enhanced viral suppression.

Dose Regimen Comparison Surrogate Endpoint Trials in Therapy-Naive Adults: EPV20001 was a multicenter, double‑blind, controlled trial in which subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive EPIVIR 300 mg once daily or EPIVIR 150 mg twice daily, in combination with zidovudine 300 mg twice daily and efavirenz 600 mg once daily. A total of 554 antiretroviral treatment-naive HIV-1–infected adults enrolled: male (79%), white (50%), median age of 35 years, baseline CD4+ cell counts of 69 to 1,089 cells per mm 3 (median = 362 cells per mm 3 ), and median baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA of 4.66 log 10 copies per mL. Outcomes of treatment through 48 weeks are summarized in Figure 1 and Table 10. Figure 1. Virologic Response through Week 48, EPV20001 a,b (Intent-to-Treat) a Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR. b Responders at each visit are subjects who had achieved and maintained HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL without discontinuation by that visit. Table 10. Outcomes of Randomized Treatment through 48 Weeks (Intent-to-Treat) a Achieved confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 400 copies per mL and maintained through 48 weeks. b Achieved suppression but rebounded by Week 48, discontinued due to virologic failure, insufficient viral response according to the investigator, or never suppressed through Week 48. c Includes consent withdrawn, lost to follow-up, protocol violation, data outside the trial-defined schedule, and randomized but never initiated treatment.

Outcome EPIVIR 300 mg Once Daily plus RETROVIR plus Efavirenz (n = 278) EPIVIR 150 mg Twice Daily plus RETROVIR plus Efavirenz (n = 276) Responder a 67% 65% Virologic failure b 8% 8% Discontinued due to clinical progression <1% 0% Discontinued due to adverse events 6% 12% Discontinued due to other reasons c 18% 14% The proportions of subjects with HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL (via Roche Ultrasensitive assay) through Week 48 were 61% for subjects receiving EPIVIR 300 mg once daily and 63% for subjects receiving EPIVIR 150 mg twice daily. Median increases in CD4+ cell counts were 144 cells per mm 3 at Week 48 in subjects receiving EPIVIR 300 mg once daily and 146 cells per mm 3 for subjects receiving EPIVIR 150 mg twice daily. A small, randomized, open‑label pilot trial, EPV40001, was conducted in Thailand.

A total of 159 treatment‑naive adult subjects (male 32%, Asian 100%, median age 30 years, baseline median CD4+ cell count 380 cells per mm 3, median plasma HIV‑1 RNA 4.8 log 10 copies per mL) were enrolled. Two of the treatment arms in this trial provided a comparison between lamivudine 300 mg once daily (n = 54) and lamivudine 150 mg twice daily (n = 52), each in combination with zidovudine 300 mg twice daily and abacavir 300 mg twice daily. In intent‑to‑treat analyses of 48‑week data, the proportions of subjects with HIV‑1 RNA below 400 copies per mL were 61% (33 of 54) in the group randomized to once‑daily lamivudine and 75% (39 of 52) in the group randomized to receive all 3 drugs twice daily; the proportions with HIV‑1 RNA below 50 copies per mL were 54% (29 of 54) in the once‑daily lamivudine group and 67% (35 of 52) in the all‑twice‑daily group; and the median increases in CD4+ cell counts were 166 cells per mm 3 in the once‑daily lamivudine group and 216 cells per mm 3 in the all‑twice‑daily group.

Figure 1. Virologic Response Through Week 48, EPV20001ab (Intent-to-Treat

Pediatric Subjects Clinical Endpoint Trial

ACTG300 was a multicenter, randomized, double‑blind trial that provided for comparison of EPIVIR plus RETROVIR (zidovudine) with didanosine monotherapy. A total of 471 symptomatic, HIV-1–infected therapy-naive (less than or equal to 56 days of antiretroviral therapy) pediatric subjects were enrolled in these 2 treatment arms. The median age was 2.7 years (range: 6 weeks to 14 years), 58% were female, and 86% were non-white.

The mean baseline CD4+ cell count was 868 cells per mm 3 (mean: 1,060 cells per mm 3 and range: 0 to 4,650 cells per mm 3 for subjects aged less than or equal to 5 years; mean: 419 cells per mm 3 and range: 0 to 1,555 cells per mm 3 for subjects aged over 5 years) and the mean baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA was 5.0 log 10 copies per mL. The median duration on trial was 10.1 months for the subjects receiving EPIVIR plus RETROVIR and 9.2 months for subjects receiving didanosine monotherapy. Results are summarized in Table 11. Table 11. Number of Subjects (%) Reaching a Primary Clinical Endpoint (Disease Progression or Death) Endpoint EPIVIR plus RETROVIR (n = 236) Didanosine (n = 235) HIV-1 disease progression or death (total) 15 (6.4%) 37 (15.7%) Physical growth failure 7 (3.0%) 6 (2.6%) Central nervous system deterioration 4 (1.7%) 12 (5.1%) CDC Clinical Category C 2 (0.8%) 8 (3.4%) Death 2 (0.8%) 11 (4.7%) Once-Daily Dosing ARROW (COL105677) was a 5-year randomized, multicenter trial which evaluated multiple aspects of clinical management of HIV-1 infection in pediatric subjects. HIV-1–infected, treatment-naïve subjects aged 3 months to 17 years were enrolled and treated with a first-line regimen containing EPIVIR and abacavir, dosed twice daily according to World Health Organization recommendations.

After a minimum of 36 weeks on treatment, subjects were given the option to participate in Randomization 3 of the ARROW trial, comparing the safety and efficacy of once-daily dosing with twice-daily dosing of EPIVIR and abacavir, in combination with a third antiretroviral drug, for an additional 96 weeks. Of the 1,206 original ARROW subjects, 669 participated in Randomization 3. Virologic suppression was not a requirement for participation: at baseline for Randomization 3 (following a minimum of 36 weeks of twice-daily treatment), 75% of subjects in the twice-daily cohort were virologically suppressed, compared with 71% of subjects in the once-daily cohort. The proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA of less than 80 copies per mL through 96 weeks is shown in Table 12. The differences between virologic responses in the two treatment arms were comparable across baseline characteristics for gender and age.

Table 12. Virologic Outcome of Randomized Treatment at Week 96 a (ARROW Randomization 3) a Analyses were based on the last observed viral load data within the Week 96 window. b Predicted difference (95% CI) of response rate is -4.5% (-11% to 2%) at Week 96. c Includes subjects who discontinued due to lack or loss of efficacy or for reasons other than an adverse event or death and had a viral load value of greater than or equal to 80 copies per mL, or subjects who had a switch in background regimen that was not permitted by the protocol. d Other includes reasons such as withdrew consent, loss to follow-up, etc. and the last available HIV-1 RNA less than 80 copies per mL (or missing). Outcome EPIVIR plus Abacavir Twice-Daily Dosing (n = 333) EPIVIR plus Abacavir Once-Daily Dosing (n = 336) HIV-1 RNA <80 copies/mL b 70% 67% HIV-1 RNA ≥80 copies/mL c 28% 31% No virologic data Discontinued due to adverse event or death 1% <1% Discontinued study for other reasons d 0% <1% Missing data during window but on study 1% 1% Analyses by formulation demonstrated the proportion of subjects with HIV-1 RNA of less than 80 copies per mL at randomization and Week 96 was higher in subjects who had received tablet formulations of EPIVIR and abacavir (75% and 72% ) than in those who had received solution formulation(s) (with EPIVIR solution given at weight band-based doses approximating 8 mg per kg per day) at any time (52% and 54% ), respectively . These differences were observed in each different age group evaluated.

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Epivir?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Epivir Prices