Entecavir Drug Information
Generic name: ENTECAVIR
Uses of Entecavir
Entecavir tablets are indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in adults and pediatric patients 2 years of age and older with evidence of active viral replication and either evidence of persistent elevations in serum aminotransferases (ALT or AST) or histologically active disease. Entecavir tablets are a hepatitis B virus nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection in adults and children at least 2 years of age with evidence of active viral replication and either evidence of persistent elevations in serum aminotransferases (ALT or AST) or histologically active disease.
Dosage & Administration of Entecavir
| 10 to 11 | 3 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| greater than 11 to 14 | 4 | ||
| greater than 14 to 17 | 5 | ||
| greater than 17 to 20 | 6 | ||
| greater than 20 to 23 | 7 | ||
| greater than 23 to 26 | 8 | ||
| greater than 26 to 30 | 9 | ||
| greater than 30 | 10 | ||
| a Children with body weight greater than 30 kg should receive 10 mL (0.5 mg) of oral solution or one 0.5 mg tablet once daily. | |||
| b Children with body weight greater than 30 kg should receive 20 mL (1 mg) of oral solution or one 1 mg tablet once daily. | |||
Side Effects of Entecavir
Clinical Trial Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Clinical Trial Experience in Adults Compensated Liver Disease Assessment of adverse reactions is based on four studies (AI463014, AI463022, AI463026, and AI463027) in which 1,720 subjects with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and compensated liver disease received double-blind treatment with entecavir 0.5 mg/day (n=679), entecavir 1 mg/day (n=183), or lamivudine (n=858) for up to 2 years. Median duration of therapy was 69 weeks for entecavir-treated subjects and 63 weeks for lamivudine-treated subjects in Studies AI463022 and AI463027 and 73 weeks for entecavir-treated subjects and 51 weeks for lamivudine-treated subjects in Studies AI463026 and AI463014. The safety profiles of entecavir and lamivudine were comparable in these studies.
The most common adverse reactions of any severity (≥3%) with at least a possible relation to study drug for entecavir-treated subjects were headache, fatigue, dizziness, and nausea. The most common adverse reactions among lamivudine-treated subjects were headache, fatigue, and dizziness. One percent of entecavir-treated subjects in these four studies compared with 4% of lamivudine-treated subjects discontinued for adverse events or abnormal laboratory test results.
Clinical adverse reactions of moderate-severe intensity and considered at least possibly related to treatment occurring during therapy in four clinical studies in which entecavir was compared with lamivudine are presented in Table 3. Table 3: Clinical Adverse Reactions a of Moderate-Severe Intensity (Grades 2 to 4) Reported in Four Entecavir Clinical Trials Through 2 Years Nucleoside-Inhibitor-Naïve b Lamivudine-Refractory c Entecavir Lamivudine Entecavir Lamivudine Body System/ Adverse Reaction 0.5 mg 100 mg 1 mg 100 mg n=679 n=668 n=183 n=190 Any Grade 2 to 4 adverse reaction a 15% 18% 22% 23% Gastrointestinal Diarrhea <1% 0 1% 0 Dyspepsia <1% <1% 1% 0 Nausea <1% <1% <1% 2% Vomiting <1% <1% <1% 0 General Fatigue 1% 1% 3% 3% Nervous System Headache 2% 2% 4% 1% Dizziness <1% <1% 0 1% Somnolence <1% <1% 0 0 Psychiatric Insomnia <1% <1% 0 <1% a Includes events of possible, probable, certain, or unknown relationship to treatment regimen. b Studies AI463022 and AI463027. c Includes Study AI463026 and the entecavir 1 mg and lamivudine treatment arms of Study AI463014, a Phase 2 multinational, randomized, double-blind study of three doses of entecavir (0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg) once daily versus continued lamivudine 100 mg once daily for up to 52 weeks in subjects who experienced recurrent viremia on lamivudine therapy. Laboratory Abnormalities Frequencies of selected treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities reported during therapy in four clinical trials of entecavir compared with lamivudine are listed in Table 4. Table 4: Selected Treatment-Emergent a Laboratory Abnormalities Reported in Four Entecavir Clinical Trials Through 2 Years Nucleoside-Inhibitor-Naïve b Lamivudine-Refractory c Entecavir Lamivudine Entecavir Lamivudine 0.5 mg 100 mg 1 mg 100 mg Test n=679 n=668 n=183 n=190 Any Grade 3 to 4 laboratory abnormality d 35% 36% 37% 45% ALT >10 x ULN and >2 x baseline 2% 4% 2% 11% ALT >5 x ULN 11% 16% 12% 24% Albumin <2.5 g/dL <1% <1% 0 2% Total bilirubin >2.5 x ULN 2% 2% 3% 2% Lipase ≥2.1 x ULN 7% 6% 7% 7% Creatinine >3 x ULN 0 0 0 0 Confirmed creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL 1% 1% 2% 1% Hyperglycemia, fasting >250 mg/dL 2% 1% 3% 1% Glycosuria e 4% 3% 4% 6% Hematuria f 9% 10% 9% 6% Platelets <50,000/mm 3 <1% <1% <1% <1% a On-treatment value worsened from baseline to Grade 3 or Grade 4 for all parameters except albumin (any on-treatment value <2.5 g/dL), confirmed creatinine increase ≥0.5 mg/dL, and ALT >10 x ULN and >2 x baseline. b Studies AI463022 and AI463027. c Includes Study AI463026 and the entecavir 1 mg and lamivudine treatment arms of Study AI463014, a Phase 2 multinational, randomized, double-blind study of three doses of entecavir (0.1, 0.5, and 1 mg) once daily versus continued lamivudine 100 mg once daily for up to 52 weeks in subjects who experienced recurrent viremia on lamivudine therapy. d Includes hematology, routine chemistries, renal and liver function tests, pancreatic enzymes, and urinalysis. e Grade 3 = 3+, large, ≥500 mg/dL; Grade 4 = 4+, marked, severe. f Grade 3 = 3+, large; Grade 4 = ≥4+, marked, severe, many. ULN=upper limit of normal.
Among entecavir-treated subjects in these studies, on-treatment ALT elevations greater than 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) and greater than 2 times baseline generally resolved with continued treatment. A majority of these exacerbations were associated with a ≥2 log 10 /mL reduction in viral load that preceded or coincided with the ALT elevation. Periodic monitoring of hepatic function is recommended during treatment.
Exacerbations of Hepatitis After Discontinuation of Treatment An exacerbation of hepatitis or ALT flare was defined as ALT greater than 10 times ULN and greater than 2 times the subject’s reference level (minimum of the baseline or last measurement at end of dosing). For all subjects who discontinued treatment (regardless of reason), Table 5 presents the proportion of subjects in each study who experienced post-treatment ALT flares. In these studies, a subset of subjects was allowed to discontinue treatment at or after 52 weeks if they achieved a protocol-defined response to therapy. If entecavir is discontinued without regard to treatment response, the rate of post-treatment flares could be higher . Table 5: Exacerbations of Hepatitis During Off-Treatment Follow-up, Subjects in Studies AI463022, AI463027, and AI463026 Subjects with ALT Elevations >10 x ULN and >2 x Reference a Entecavir Lamivudine Nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve HBeAg-positive 4/174 (2%) 13/147 (9%) HBeAg-negative 24/302 (8%) 30/270 (11%) Lamivudine-refractory 6/52 (12%) 0/16 a Reference is the minimum of the baseline or last measurement at end of dosing.
Median time to off-treatment exacerbation was 23 weeks for entecavir-treated subjects and 10 weeks for lamivudine-treated subjects. Decompensated Liver Disease Study AI463048 was a randomized, open-label study of entecavir 1 mg once daily versus adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg once daily given for up to 48 weeks in adult subjects with chronic HBV infection and evidence of hepatic decompensation, defined as a Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score of 7 or higher . Among the 102 subjects receiving entecavir, the most common treatment-emergent adverse events of any severity, regardless of causality, occurring through Week 48 were peripheral edema (16%), ascites (15%), pyrexia (14%), hepatic encephalopathy (10%), and upper respiratory infection (10%). Clinical adverse reactions not listed in Table 3 that were observed through Week 48 include blood bicarbonate decreased (2%) and renal failure (<1%). Eighteen of 102 (18%) subjects treated with entecavir, and 18/89 (20%) subjects treated with adefovir dipivoxil died during the first 48 weeks of therapy. The majority of deaths (11 in the entecavir group and 16 in the adefovir dipivoxil group) were due to liver-related causes such as hepatic failure, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome, and upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage.
The rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) through Week 48 was 6% (6/102) for subjects treated with entecavir and 8% (7/89) for subjects treated with adefovir dipivoxil. Five percent of subjects in either treatment arm discontinued therapy due to an adverse event through Week 48. No subject in either treatment arm experienced an on-treatment hepatic flare (ALT >2 x baseline and >10 x ULN) through Week 48. Eleven of 102 (11%) subjects treated with entecavir and 11/89 (13%) subjects treated with adefovir dipivoxil had a confirmed increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL through Week 48. HIV/HBV Co-infected The safety profile of entecavir 1 mg (n=51) in HIV/HBV co-infected subjects enrolled in Study AI463038 was similar to that of placebo (n=17) through 24 weeks of blinded treatment and similar to that seen in non-HIV infected subjects . Liver Transplant Recipients Among 65 subjects receiving entecavir in an open-label, post-liver transplant trial , the frequency and nature of adverse events were consistent with those expected in patients who have received a liver transplant and the known safety profile of entecavir. Clinical Trial Experience in Pediatric Subjects The safety of entecavir in pediatric subjects 2 to less than 18 years of age is based on two clinical trials in subjects with chronic HBV infection (one Phase 2 pharmacokinetic trial and one Phase 3 trial ). These trials provided experience in 168 HBeAg-positive subjects treated with entecavir for a median duration of 72 weeks.
The adverse reactions observed in pediatric subjects who received treatment with entecavir were consistent with those observed in clinical trials of entecavir in adults. Adverse drug reactions reported in greater than 1% of pediatric subjects included abdominal pain, rash events, poor palatability (“product taste abnormal”), nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting.
Postmarketing Experience Data from Long-Term Observational Study Study AI463080 was a randomized
global, observational, open-label Phase 4 study to assess long-term risks and benefits of entecavir (0.5 mg/day or 1 mg/day) treatment as compared to other standard-of-care HBV nucleos(t)ide analogues in subjects with chronic HBV infection. A total of 12,378 patients were treated with entecavir (n=6,216) or other HBV nucleos(t)ide treatment (n=6,162). Patients were evaluated at baseline and subsequently every 6 months for up to 10 years. The principal clinical outcome events assessed during the study were overall malignant neoplasms, liver-related HBV disease progression, HCC, non-HCC malignant neoplasms, and death.
The study showed that entecavir was not significantly associated with an increased risk of malignant neoplasms compared to other standard-of-care HBV nucleos(t)ides, as assessed by either the composite endpoint of overall malignant neoplasms or the individual endpoint of non-HCC malignant neoplasms. The most commonly reported malignancy in both the entecavir and non-ETV groups was HCC followed by gastrointestinal malignancies. The data also showed that long-term entecavir use was not associated with a lower occurrence of HBV disease progression or a lower rate of death overall compared to other HBV nucleos(t)ides.
The principal clinical outcome event assessments are shown in Table 6. Table 6: Principal Analyses of Time to Adjudicated Events - Randomized Treated Subjects Endpoint c Number of Subjects with Events Entecavir N=6,216 Non-ETV N=6,162 Hazard Ratio (CI a ) Primary Endpoints Overall malignant neoplasm 331 337 0.93 Liver-related HBV disease progression 350 375 0.89 Death 238 264 0.85 Secondary Endpoints Non-HCC malignant neoplasm 95 81 1.10 HCC 240b 263 0.87 Analyses were stratified by geographic region and prior HBV nucleos(t)ide experience. a 95.03% CI for overall malignant neoplasm, death, and liver-related HBV disease progression; 95% CI for non-HCC malignant neoplasm and HCC. b One subject had a pre-treatment HCC event and was excluded from the analysis. c Overall malignant neoplasm is a composite event of HCC or non-HCC malignant neoplasm. Liver-related HBV disease progression is a composite event of liver-related death, HCC, or non-HCC HBV disease progression. CI = confidence interval; N = total number of subjects.
Limitations of the study included population changes over the long-term follow-up period and more frequent post-randomization treatment changes in the non-ETV group. In addition, the study was underpowered to demonstrate a difference in the non-HCC malignancy rate because of the lower than expected background rate. Adverse Reactions from Postmarketing Spontaneous Reports The following adverse reactions have been reported during postmarketing use of entecavir.
Because these reactions were reported voluntarily from a population of unknown size, it is not possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to entecavir exposure. Immune system disorders: Anaphylactoid reaction. Metabolism and nutrition disorders: Lactic acidosis.
Hepatobiliary disorders: Increased transaminases. Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: Alopecia, rash.
Warnings & Cautions for Entecavir
Severe Acute Exacerbations of Hepatitis B Severe acute exacerbations of hepatitis B
have been reported in patients who have discontinued anti-hepatitis B therapy, including entecavir . Hepatic function should be monitored closely with both clinical and laboratory follow-up for at least several months in patients who discontinue anti-hepatitis B therapy. If appropriate, initiation of anti-hepatitis B therapy may be warranted.
Patients Co-infected with
HIV and HBV Entecavir has not been evaluated in HIV/HBV co-infected patients who were not simultaneously receiving effective HIV treatment. Limited clinical experience suggests there is a potential for the development of resistance to HIV nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors if entecavir is used to treat chronic hepatitis B virus infection in patients with HIV infection that is not being treated . Therefore, therapy with entecavir is not recommended for HIV/HBV co-infected patients who are not also receiving HAART. Before initiating entecavir therapy, HIV antibody testing should be offered to all patients. Entecavir has not been studied as a treatment for HIV infection and is not recommended for this use.
Lactic Acidosis and Severe Hepatomegaly with Steatosis Lactic acidosis and severe hepatomegaly
with steatosis, including fatal cases, have been reported with the use of nucleoside analogue inhibitors, including entecavir, alone or in combination with antiretrovirals. A majority of these cases have been in women. Obesity and prolonged nucleoside inhibitor exposure may be risk factors.
Particular caution should be exercised when administering nucleoside analogue inhibitors to any patient with known risk factors for liver disease; however, cases have also been reported in patients with no known risk factors. Lactic acidosis with entecavir use has been reported, often in association with hepatic decompensation, other serious medical conditions, or drug exposures. Patients with decompensated liver disease may be at higher risk for lactic acidosis.
Treatment with entecavir should be suspended in any patient who develops clinical or laboratory findings suggestive of lactic acidosis or pronounced hepatotoxicity (which may include hepatomegaly and steatosis even in the absence of marked transaminase elevations).
Drug Interactions with Entecavir
Since entecavir is primarily eliminated by the kidneys , co-administration of entecavir with drugs that reduce renal function or compete for active tubular secretion may increase serum concentrations of either entecavir or the co-administered drug. Co-administration of entecavir with lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate did not result in significant drug interactions. The effects of co-administration of entecavir with other drugs that are renally eliminated or are known to affect renal function have not been evaluated, and patients should be monitored closely for adverse events when entecavir is co-administered with such drugs.
Pregnancy Safety for Entecavir
Pregnancy Pregnancy Exposure Registry There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to entecavir during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients by calling the Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry (APR) at 1-800-258-4263. Risk Summary Prospective pregnancy data from the APR are not sufficient to adequately assess the risk of birth defects, miscarriage or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Entecavir use during pregnancy has been evaluated in a limited number of individuals reported to the APR and the number of exposures to entecavir is insufficient to make a risk assessment compared to a reference population.
The estimated background rate for major birth defects is 2.7% in the U.S. reference population of the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program (MACDP). The rate of miscarriage is not reported in the APR. All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 15% to 20%. In animal reproduction studies, no adverse developmental effects were observed with entecavir at clinically relevant exposures. No developmental toxicities were observed at systemic exposures (AUC) approximately 25 (rats) and 200 (rabbits) times the exposure at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 1 mg/day ( see Data ). Data Animal Data Entecavir was administered orally to pregnant rats (at 2, 20, and 200 mg per kg per day) and rabbits (at 1, 4, and 16 mg per kg per day) during organogenesis (on gestation Days 6 through 15 and 6 through 18 ). In rats, embryofetal toxicity including post-implantation loss, resorptions, tail and vertebral malformations, skeletal variations including reduced ossification (vertebrate, sternebrae, and phalanges) and extra lumbar vertebrae and ribs, and lower fetal body weights were observed at systemic exposures (AUC) 3,100 times those in humans at the MRHD. Maternal toxicity was also observed at this dose level.
In rabbits, embryofetal toxicity including post implantation loss, resorptions and skeletal variations, including reduced ossification (hyoid) and increased incidence of 13 th rib, were observed at systemic exposures (AUC) 883 times those in humans at the MRHD. There were no signs of embryofetal toxicity when pregnant animals received oral entecavir at 28 (rat) and 212 (rabbit) times the human exposure (AUC) at the MRHD. In a pre/postnatal development study, entecavir was administered orally to pregnant rats at 0.3, 3, and 30 mg per kg per day from gestation day 6 to lactation/post-partum day 20. No adverse effects on the offspring occurred at up to the highest dose evaluated, resulting in exposures (AUC) greater than 94 times those in humans at the MRHD.
Pediatric Use of Entecavir
Pediatric Use Entecavir was evaluated in two clinical trials of pediatric subjects 2 years of age and older with HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection and compensated liver disease. The exposure of entecavir in nucleoside-inhibitor-treatment-naïve and lamivudine-experienced pediatric subjects 2 years of age and older with HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection and compensated liver disease receiving 0.015 mg/kg (up to 0.5 mg once daily) or 0.03 mg/kg (up to 1 mg once daily), respectively, was evaluated in Study AI463028. Safety and efficacy of the selected dose in treatment-naïve pediatric subjects were confirmed in Study AI463189, a randomized, placebo-controlled treatment trial . There are limited data available on the use of entecavir in lamivudine-experienced pediatric patients; entecavir should be used in these patients only if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the child. Since some pediatric patients may require long-term or even lifetime management of chronic active hepatitis B, consideration should be given to the impact of entecavir on future treatment options . The efficacy and safety of entecavir have not been established in patients less than 2 years of age.
Use of entecavir in this age group has not been evaluated because treatment of HBV in this age group is rarely required.
Overdosage Information for Entecavir
There is limited experience of entecavir overdosage reported in patients. Healthy subjects who received single entecavir doses up to 40 mg or multiple doses up to 20 mg/day for up to 14 days had no increase in or unexpected adverse events. If overdose occurs, the patient must be monitored for evidence of toxicity, and standard supportive treatment applied as necessary.
Following a single 1 mg dose of entecavir, a 4-hour hemodialysis session removed approximately 13% of the entecavir dose.
Clinical Studies of Entecavir
Outcomes in Adults At 48 Weeks
The safety and efficacy of entecavir in adults were evaluated in three Phase 3 active-controlled trials. These studies included 1,633 subjects 16 years of age or older with chronic hepatitis B virus infection (serum HBsAg-positive for at least 6 months) accompanied by evidence of viral replication (detectable serum HBV DNA, as measured by the bDNA hybridization or PCR assay). Subjects had persistently elevated ALT levels at least 1.3 times ULN and chronic inflammation on liver biopsy compatible with a diagnosis of chronic viral hepatitis. The safety and efficacy of entecavir were also evaluated in a study of 191 HBV-infected subjects with decompensated liver disease and in a study of 68 subjects co-infected with HBV and HIV. Nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve Subjects with Compensated Liver Disease HBeAg-positive: Study AI463022 was a multinational, randomized, double-blind study of entecavir 0.5 mg once daily versus lamivudine 100 mg once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks in 709 (of 715 randomized) nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve subjects with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, compensated liver disease, and detectable HBeAg.
The mean age of subjects was 35 years, 75% were male, 57% were Asian, 40% were Caucasian, and 13% had previously received interferon-α. At baseline, subjects had a mean Knodell Necroinflammatory Score of 7.8, mean serum HBV DNA as measured by Roche COBAS Amplicor ® PCR assay was 9.66 log 10 copies/mL, and mean serum ALT level was 143 U/L. Paired, adequate liver biopsy samples were available for 89% of subjects. HBeAg-negative (anti-HBe-positive/HBV DNA-positive): Study AI463027 was a multinational, randomized, double-blind study of entecavir 0.5 mg once daily versus lamivudine 100 mg once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks in 638 (of 648 randomized) nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve subjects with HBeAg-negative (HBeAb-positive) chronic hepatitis B virus infection and compensated liver disease. The mean age of subjects was 44 years, 76% were male, 39% were Asian, 58% were Caucasian, and 13% had previously received interferon-α. At baseline, subjects had a mean Knodell Necroinflammatory Score of 7.8, mean serum HBV DNA as measured by Roche COBAS Amplicor PCR assay was 7.58 log 10 copies/mL, and mean serum ALT level was 142 U/L. Paired, adequate liver biopsy samples were available for 88% of subjects.
In Studies AI463022 and AI463027, entecavir was superior to lamivudine on the primary efficacy endpoint of Histologic Improvement, defined as a 2-point or greater reduction in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score with no worsening in Knodell Fibrosis Score at Week 48, and on the secondary efficacy measures of reduction in viral load and ALT normalization. Histologic Improvement and change in Ishak Fibrosis Score are shown in Table 9. Selected virologic, biochemical, and serologic outcome measures are shown in Table 10. Table 9: Histologic Improvement and Change in Ishak Fibrosis Score at Week 48, Nucleoside-Inhibitor-Naïve Subjects in Studies AI463022 and AI463027 Study AI463022 (HBeAg-Positive) Study AI463027 (HBeAg-Negative) Entecavir Lamivudine Entecavir Lamivudine 0.5 mg 100 mg 0.5 mg 100 mg n=314 a n=314 a n=296 a n=287 a Histologic Improvement (Knodell Scores) Improvement b 72% 62% 70% 61% No improvement 21% 24% 19% 26% Ishak Fibrosis Score Improvement c 39% 35% 36% 38% No change 46% 40% 41% 34% Worsening c 8% 10% 12% 15% Missing Week 48 biopsy 7% 14% 10% 13% a Subjects with evaluable baseline histology (baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score ≥2). b ≥2-point decrease in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score from baseline with no worsening of the Knodell Fibrosis Score. c For Ishak Fibrosis Score, improvement = ≥1-point decrease from baseline and worsening = ≥1-point increase from baseline. Table 10: Selected Virologic, Biochemical, and Serologic Endpoints at Week 48, Nucleoside-Inhibitor-Naïve Subjects in Studies AI463022 and AI463027 Study AI463022 (HBeAg-Positive) Study AI463027 (HBeAg-Negative) Entecavir Lamivudine Entecavir Lamivudine 0.5 mg 100 mg 0.5 mg 100 mg n=354 n=355 n=325 n=313 HBV DNA a Proportion undetectable (<300 copies/mL) 67% 36% 90% 72% Mean change from baseline (log 10 copies/mL) −6.86 −5.39 −5.04 −4.53 ALT normalization (≤1 x ULN) 68% 60% 78% 71% HBeAg seroconversion 21% 18% NA NA a Roche COBAS Amplicor PCR assay.
Histologic Improvement was independent of baseline levels of HBV DNA or ALT. Lamivudine-refractory Subjects with Compensated Liver Disease Study AI463026 was a multinational, randomized, double-blind study of entecavir in 286 (of 293 randomized) subjects with lamivudine-refractory chronic hepatitis B virus infection and compensated liver disease. Subjects receiving lamivudine at study entry either switched to entecavir 1 mg once daily (with neither a washout nor an overlap period) or continued on lamivudine 100 mg for a minimum of 52 weeks. The mean age of subjects was 39 years, 76% were male, 37% were Asian, 62% were Caucasian, and 52% had previously received interferon-α. The mean duration of prior lamivudine therapy was 2.7 years, and 85% had lamivudine resistance substitutions at baseline by an investigational line probe assay.
At baseline, subjects had a mean Knodell Necroinflammatory Score of 6.5, mean serum HBV DNA as measured by Roche COBAS Amplicor PCR assay was 9.36 log 10 copies/mL, and mean serum ALT level was 128 U/L. Paired, adequate liver biopsy samples were available for 87% of subjects. Entecavir was superior to lamivudine on a primary endpoint of Histologic Improvement (using the Knodell Score at Week 48). These results and change in Ishak Fibrosis Score are shown in Table 11. Table 12 shows selected virologic, biochemical, and serologic endpoints. Table 11: Histologic Improvement and Change in Ishak Fibrosis Score at Week 48, Lamivudine-Refractory Subjects in Study AI463026 Entecavir Lamivudine 1 mg 100 mg n=124 a n=116 a Histologic Improvement (Knodell Scores) Improvement b 55% 28% No improvement 34% 57% Ishak Fibrosis Score Improvement c 34% 16% No change 44% 42% Worsening c 11% 26% Missing Week 48 biopsy 11% 16% a Subjects with evaluable baseline histology (baseline Knodell Necroinflammatory Score ≥2). b ≥2-point decrease in Knodell Necroinflammatory Score from baseline with no worsening of the Knodell Fibrosis Score. c For Ishak Fibrosis Score, improvement = ≥1-point decrease from baseline and worsening = ≥1-point increase from baseline.
Table 12: Selected Virologic, Biochemical, and Serologic Endpoints at Week 48, Lamivudine-Refractory Subjects in Study AI463026 Entecavir Lamivudine 1 mg 100 mg n=141 n=145 HBV DNA a Proportion undetectable (<300 copies/mL) 19% 1% Mean change from baseline (log 10 copies/mL) −5.11 −0.48 ALT normalization (≤1 x ULN) 61% 15% HBeAg seroconversion 8% 3% a Roche COBAS Amplicor PCR assay (LLOQ = 300 copies/mL). Histologic Improvement was independent of baseline levels of HBV DNA or ALT. Subjects with Decompensated Liver Disease Study AI463048 was a randomized, open-label study of entecavir 1 mg once daily versus adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg once daily in 191 (of 195 randomized) adult subjects with HBeAg-positive or -negative chronic HBV infection and evidence of hepatic decompensation, defined as a Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score of 7 or higher. Subjects were either HBV-treatment-naïve or previously treated, predominantly with lamivudine or interferon-α. In Study AI463048, 100 subjects were randomized to treatment with entecavir and 91 subjects to treatment with adefovir dipivoxil. Two subjects randomized to treatment with adefovir dipivoxil actually received treatment with entecavir for the duration of the study.
The mean age of subjects was 52 years, 74% were male, 54% were Asian, 33% were Caucasian, and 5% were Black/African American. At baseline, subjects had a mean serum HBV DNA by PCR of 7.83 log 10 copies/mL and mean ALT level of 100 U/L; 54% of subjects were HBeAg-positive; 35% had genotypic evidence of lamivudine resistance. The baseline mean CTP score was 8.6. Results for selected study endpoints at Week 48 are shown in Table 13. Table 13: Selected Endpoints at Week 48, Subjects with Decompensated Liver Disease, Study AI463048 Entecavir Adefovir Dipivoxil 1 mg 10 mg n=100 a n=91 a HBV DNA b Proportion undetectable (<300 copies/mL) 57% 20% Stable or improved CTP score c 61% 67% HBsAg loss 5% 0 Normalization of ALT (≤1 x ULN) d 49/78 (63%) 33/71 (46%) a Endpoints were analyzed using intention-to-treat (ITT) method, treated subjects as randomized. b Roche COBAS Amplicor PCR assay (LLOQ = 300 copies/mL). c Defined as decrease or no change from baseline in CTP score. d Denominator is subjects with abnormal values at baseline.
ULN=upper limit of normal. Subjects Co-infected with HIV and HBV Study AI463038 was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of entecavir versus placebo in 68 subjects co-infected with HIV and HBV who experienced recurrence of HBV viremia while receiving a lamivudine-containing highly active antiretroviral (HAART) regimen. Subjects continued their lamivudine-containing HAART regimen (lamivudine dose 300 mg/day) and were assigned to add either entecavir 1 mg once daily (51 subjects) or placebo (17 subjects) for 24 weeks followed by an open-label phase for an additional 24 weeks where all subjects received entecavir.
At baseline, subjects had a mean serum HBV DNA level by PCR of 9.13 log 10 copies/mL. Ninety-nine percent of subjects were HBeAg-positive at baseline, with a mean baseline ALT level of
U/L. Median
HIV RNA level remained stable at approximately 2 log 10 copies/mL through 24 weeks of blinded therapy. Virologic and biochemical endpoints at Week 24 are shown in Table 14. There are no data in patients with HIV/HBV co-infection who have not received prior lamivudine therapy. Entecavir has not been evaluated in HIV/HBV co-infected patients who were not simultaneously receiving effective HIV treatment . Table 14: Virologic and Biochemical Endpoints at Week 24, Study AI463038 Entecavir 1 mg a n=51 Placebo a n=17 HBV DNA b Proportion undetectable (<300 copies/mL) 6% 0 Mean change from baseline (log 10 copies/mL) −3.65 +0.11 ALT normalization (≤1 x ULN) 34% c 8% c a All subjects also received a lamivudine-containing HAART regimen. b Roche COBAS Amplicor PCR assay (LLOQ = 300 copies/mL). c Percentage of subjects with abnormal ALT (>1 x ULN) at baseline who achieved ALT normalization (n=35 for entecavir and n=12 for placebo). For subjects originally assigned to entecavir, at the end of the open-label phase (Week 48), 8% of subjects had HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by PCR, the mean change from baseline HBV DNA by PCR was −4.20 log 10 copies/mL, and 37% of subjects with abnormal ALT at baseline had ALT normalization (≤1 x ULN). Beyond 48 Weeks The optimal duration of therapy with entecavir is unknown.
According to protocol-mandated criteria in the Phase 3 clinical trials, subjects discontinued entecavir or lamivudine treatment after 52 weeks according to a definition of response based on HBV virologic suppression (<
MEq/mL by bDNA assay) and loss of HBeAg (in HBeAg-positive subjects) or
ALT <1.25 x ULN (in HBeAg-negative subjects) at Week 48. Subjects who achieved virologic suppression but did not have serologic response (HBeAg-positive) or did not achieve ALT <1.25 x ULN (HBeAg-negative) continued blinded dosing through 96 weeks or until the response criteria were met. These protocol-specified subject management guidelines are not intended as guidance for clinical practice. Nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve Subjects Among nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve, HBeAg-positive subjects (Study AI463022), 243 (69%) entecavir-treated subjects and 164 (46%) lamivudine-treated subjects continued blinded treatment for up to 96 weeks.
Of those continuing blinded treatment in Year 2, 180 (74%) entecavir subjects and 60 (37%) lamivudine subjects achieved HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by PCR at the end of dosing (up to 96 weeks). 193 (79%) entecavir subjects achieved ALT ≤1 x ULN compared to 112 (68%) lamivudine subjects, and HBeAg seroconversion occurred in 26 (11%) entecavir subjects and 20 (12%) lamivudine subjects. Among nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve, HBeAg-positive subjects, 74 (21%) entecavir subjects and 67 (19%) lamivudine subjects met the definition of response at Week 48, discontinued study drugs, and were followed off treatment for 24 weeks. Among entecavir responders, 26 (35%) subjects had HBV DNA <300 copies/mL, 55 (74%) subjects had ALT ≤1 x ULN, and 56 (76%) subjects sustained HBeAg seroconversion at the end of follow-up.
Among lamivudine responders, 20 (30%) subjects had HBV DNA <300 copies/mL, 41 (61%) subjects had ALT ≤1 x ULN, and 47 (70%) subjects sustained HBeAg seroconversion at the end of follow-up. Among nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve, HBeAg-negative subjects (Study AI463027), 26 (8%) entecavir-treated subjects and 28 (9%) lamivudine-treated subjects continued blinded treatment for up to 96 weeks. In this small cohort continuing treatment in Year 2, 22 entecavir and 16 lamivudine subjects had HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by PCR, and 7 and 6 subjects, respectively, had ALT ≤1 x ULN at the end of dosing (up to 96 weeks). Among nucleoside-inhibitor-naïve, HBeAg-negative subjects, 275 (85%) entecavir subjects and 245 (78%) lamivudine subjects met the definition of response at Week 48, discontinued study drugs, and were followed off treatment for 24 weeks.
In this cohort, very few subjects in each treatment arm had HBV DNA <300 copies/mL by PCR at the end of follow-up. At the end of follow-up, 126 (46%) entecavir subjects and 84 (34%) lamivudine subjects had ALT ≤1 x ULN. Lamivudine-refractory Subjects Among lamivudine-refractory subjects (Study AI463026), 77 (55%) entecavir-treated subjects and 3 (2%) lamivudine subjects continued blinded treatment for up to 96 weeks. In this cohort of entecavir subjects, 31 (40%) subjects achieved HBV DNA <300 copies/mL, 62 (81%) subjects had ALT ≤1 x ULN, and 8 (10%) subjects demonstrated HBeAg seroconversion at the end of dosing.
Outcomes in Pediatric Subjects
The pharmacokinetics, safety and antiviral activity of entecavir in pediatric subjects were initially assessed in Study AI463028. Twenty-four treatment-naïve and 19 lamivudine-experienced HBeAg-positive pediatric subjects 2 to less than 18 years of age with compensated chronic hepatitis B virus infection and elevated ALT were treated with entecavir 0.015 mg/kg (up to 0.5 mg) or 0.03 mg/kg (up to 1 mg) once daily. Fifty-eight percent (14/24) of treatment-naïve subjects and 47% (9/19) of lamivudine-experienced subjects achieved HBV DNA <50 IU/mL at Week 48 and ALT normalized in 83% (20/24) of treatment-naïve and 95% (18/19) of lamivudine-experienced subjects. Safety and antiviral efficacy were confirmed in Study AI463189, a study of entecavir among 180 nucleoside-inhibitor-treatment-naïve pediatric subjects 2 to less than 18 years of age with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B infection, compensated liver disease, and elevated ALT. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to receive blinded treatment with entecavir 0.015 mg/kg up to 0.5 mg/day (N=120) or placebo (N=60). The randomization was stratified by age group (2 to 6 years; > 6 to 12 years; and > 12 to < 18 years). Baseline demographics and HBV disease characteristics were comparable between the 2 treatment arms and across age cohorts.
At study entry, the mean HBV DNA was 8.1 log 10 IU/mL and mean ALT was 103 U/L. The primary efficacy endpoint was a composite of HBeAg seroconversion and serum HBV DNA < 50 IU/mL at Week 48 assessed in the first 123 subjects reaching 48 weeks of blinded treatment. Twenty-four percent (20/82) of subjects in the entecavir-treated group and 2% (1/41) of subjects in the placebo-treated group met the primary endpoint. Forty-six percent (38/82) of entecavir-treated subjects and 2% (1/41) of placebo-treated subjects achieved HBV DNA < 50 IU/mL at Week 48. ALT normalization occurred in 67% (55/82) of entecavir-treated subjects and 22% (9/41) of placebo-treated subjects; 24% (20/82) of entecavir-treated subjects and 12% (5/41) of placebo-treated subjects had HBeAg seroconversion.
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Entecavir?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Entecavir Prices