Enspryng Drug Information

Generic name: SATRALIZUMAB

Save on Enspryng at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Enspryng

is indicated for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive. ENSPRYNG is an interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive.

Dosage & Administration of Enspryng

Less than 8 weeks during the maintenance period or missed a loading doseAdminister 120 mg by subcutaneous injection as soon as possible, and do not wait until the next planned dose. Maintenance period After the delayed or missed dose is administered, reset the dose schedule to every 4 weeks. Loading period If the second loading dose is delayed or missed, administer as soon as possible and administer the 3rd and final loading dose 2 weeks later. If the third loading dose is delayed or missed, administer as soon as possible and administer the 1st maintenance dose 4 weeks later.
8 weeks to less than 12 weeks120 mg by subcutaneous injection at 0"0 weeks" refers to time of the first administration after the missed dose. and 2 weeks, followed by 120 mg every 4 weeks.
12 weeks or longer120 mg by subcutaneous injection at 0, 2, and 4 weeks followed by 120 mg every 4 weeks.

Side Effects of Enspryng

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical studies are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical studies of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical studies of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. The safety of ENSPRYNG was evaluated in two randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, which included 41 anti-AQP4 seropositive patients treated with ENSPRYNG in Study 1 and 26 anti-AQP4 seropositive patients treated with ENSPRYNG in Study 2 . In the double-blind, controlled period, the median exposure time on ENSPRYNG treatment was approximately 2 years in Study 1 and approximately 3 years in Study 2. The median exposure time on placebo treatment was approximately 1 year in both Study 1 and Study 2. Adverse reactions that occurred in Study 1 and Study 2 in more than 5% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG, and at a greater incidence than in patients who received placebo, are shown in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively. The most common adverse reactions (15% or greater with ENSPRYNG in either) were nasopharyngitis, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, gastritis, rash, arthralgia, extremity pain, fatigue, and nausea.

Table 3 Adverse Reactions Occurring in 4 or More Patients Treated with ENSPRYNG and Greater Incidence than Placebo in Study 1 Adverse Reaction ENSPRYNG (N = 41) % PLACEBO (N = 23) % Rash 17 0 Arthralgia 17 0 Pain in extremity 15 9 Fatigue 15 4 Nausea 15 9 Nasopharyngitis 12 4 Pruritus 10 0 Depression 10 0 Cellulitis 10 0 Neutropenia 10 4 Blood creatine phosphokinase increased 10 4 Fall 10 4 Table 4 Adverse Reactions Occurring in 3 or More Patients Treated with ENSPRYNG and Greater Incidence than Placebo in Study 2 Adverse Reaction ENSPRYNG + IST (N = 26) % PLACEBO + IST (N = 26) % Nasopharyngitis 31 15 Headache 27 12 Upper respiratory tract infection 19 12 Gastritis 15 0 Arthralgia 12 0 Pharyngitis 12 8 Injection-Related Reactions In Study 1 and Study 2, injection-related reactions were reported in 9% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared with 8% in patients receiving placebo. These reactions in the ENSPRYNG-treated patients were predominantly mild to moderate in severity, and most occurred within 24 hours after the injection. The most commonly reported systemic symptom was diarrhea.

The reported local injection site reactions were pruritus, injection site reaction, and skin mass. Infections In Study 1, the rate of patients with infections was 51 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 32, 78) in patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared with 108 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 52, 199) in patients receiving placebo. The rate of patients with serious infections was 5 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 1, 14) in patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared with 4 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 0, 21) in patients receiving placebo.

In Study 2, the rate of patients with infections was 168 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 100, 265) in patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared with 143 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 83, 229) in patients treated with placebo. The rate of patients with serious infections was 4 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 1, 15) in patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared with 10 patients/100 patient-years (95% CI: 2, 28) in patients receiving placebo. Laboratory Abnormalities Decreased Neutrophil Count Of the patients treated with ENSPRYNG, 10% had neutrophils below 1 × 10 9 /L compared to 9% in placebo in Study 1. In Study 2, 15% patients had neutrophils below 1 × 10 9 /L compared to 4% in placebo.

There was one patient in Study 1 treated with ENSPRYNG with neutrophil counts < 0.5 × 10 9 /L, and one patient in Study 2 discontinued ENSPRYNG because of neutropenia. Decreased Platelet Count In Study 1, a shift in platelet count decreases from normal at baseline to below the lower limit of normal (LLN) occurred in 26% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared to 5% of patients receiving placebo. In Study 2, decreases in platelet counts from normal at baseline to below the LLN occurred in 35% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG and in 17% of patients receiving placebo.

None of the patients had a decrease in platelet count to less than 50 × 10 9 /L. Elevated Liver Enzymes In Study 1, increases from normal at baseline to above ULN in ALT or AST occurred in 43% and 25% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG, respectively, compared to 13% and 9% of patients receiving placebo. In Study 2, increases from normal at baseline to above the ULN in ALT or AST occurred in 8% and 8% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG, respectively, compared to 12% and 19% of patients receiving placebo. In Study 1 and Study 2 combined, elevations of ALT or AST greater than 3 times the ULN occurred in 3% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG, compared to no patients treated with placebo.

These elevations were not associated with increases in total bilirubin. One patient receiving ENSPRYNG in Study 2 had an elevation of ALT above 5 times the ULN, which was observed 4 weeks after initiation of therapy, normalizing 78 days after discontinuation of ENSPRYNG. Lipid Abnormalities In Study 1 and Study 2, elevations in total cholesterol above 7.75 mmol/L (300 mg/dl) occurred in 12% and 15% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG, respectively, compared to no patients receiving placebo. Elevations in triglycerides above 3.42 mmol/L (300 mg/dl) occurred in 27% and 12% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG in Study 1 and Study 2, respectively, compared to 13% and 8% of patients receiving placebo.

Fibrinogen Levels In Study 1, the median percent reduction in fibrinogen was 38% in patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared to 5% in patients receiving placebo. In Study 2, the median percent reduction in fibrinogen level was 33% in patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared to 0% in patients receiving placebo. Complement Levels In Study 1, the median percent reduction in the C3 and C4 components of complement was 23% and 50% in patients treated with ENSPRYNG, respectively, compared to 0% and 1% patients receiving placebo.

In Study 2, the median percent reduction in the C3 and C4 components of complement was 20% and 53% in patients treated with ENSPRYNG, respectively, compared to 0% and 1% in patients receiving placebo. Body Weight In the pool of Studies 1 and 2, body weight increases of at least 7% from baseline occurred in 28% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared to 8% of patients receiving placebo. Body weight increases of at least 15% from baseline occurred in 4% of patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared to 4% of patients receiving placebo.

Immunogenicity As with all therapeutic proteins, there is a potential for immunogenicity.

The detection of antibody formation is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. Additionally, the observed incidence of antibody (including neutralizing antibody) positivity in an assay may be influenced by several factors, including assay methodology, sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease. For these reasons, comparison of the incidence of anti-satralizumab-mwge antibodies in the studies described below with the incidence of antibodies in other studies or to other products may be misleading.

In Study 1 and Study 2, anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs) were observed in 73% and 38% of patients receiving ENSPRYNG in the double-blind period, respectively. The ability of these ADAs to neutralize satralizumab-mwge binding is unknown. Patients with higher body weight and lower exposure were more likely to develop ADAs (irrespective of treatment with IST). Exposure was lower in ADA positive patients.

Although anti-satralizumab-mwge antibody development was not found to affect the efficacy of ENSPRYNG in these patients, the available data are too limited to make definitive conclusions. Immunogenicity does not have a clinically-relevant impact on safety. Based on the available information, neither dose interruption nor modification is warranted in those patients who develop ADAs.

Warnings & Cautions for Enspryng

Infections

An increased risk of infections, including serious and potentially fatal infections, has been observed in patients treated with IL-6 receptor antagonists, including ENSPRYNG. The most common infections reported in a randomized clinical trial of patients treated with ENSPRYNG who were not on other chronic immunosuppressant therapies (Study 1), and that occurred more often than in patients receiving placebo, were nasopharyngitis (12%) and cellulitis (10%). The most common infections in patients who were on an additional concurrent immunosuppressant, and that occurred more often than in patients receiving placebo, were nasopharyngitis (31%), upper respiratory infection (19%), and pharyngitis (12%). Delay ENSPRYNG administration in patients with an active infection, including localized infections, until the infection is resolved. Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) Reactivation Risk of HBV reactivation has been observed with other immunosuppressant therapies. Patients with chronic HBV infection were excluded from clinical trials.

Perform HBV screening in all patients before initiation of treatment with ENSPRYNG. Do not administer ENSPRYNG to patients with active hepatitis. For patients who are chronic carriers of HBV or are negative for HBsAg and positive for HB core antibody, consult liver disease experts before starting and during treatment with ENSPRYNG. Tuberculosis Tuberculosis has occurred in patients treated with other interleukin-6 receptor antagonists. Patients should be evaluated for tuberculosis risk factors and tested for latent infection prior to initiating ENSPRYNG. Consider anti-tuberculosis therapy prior to initiation of ENSPRYNG in patients with a history of latent or active tuberculosis in whom an adequate course of treatment cannot be confirmed, and for patients with a negative test for latent tuberculosis but having risk factors for tuberculosis infection.

Consult infectious disease experts regarding whether initiating anti-tuberculosis therapy is appropriate before starting treatment. Patients should be monitored for the development of symptoms and signs of tuberculosis with ENSPRYNG, even if initial tuberculosis testing is negative. Vaccinations Live or live-attenuated vaccines should not be given concurrently with ENSPRYNG because clinical safety has not been established.

Administer all immunizations according to immunization guidelines at least 4 weeks prior to initiation of ENSPRYNG for live or live-attenuated vaccines and, whenever possible, at least 2 weeks prior to initiation of ENSPRYNG for non-live vaccines.

Elevated Liver Enzymes Mild and moderate elevations of liver enzymes have been

observed in patients treated with ENSPRYNG at a higher incidence than in patients receiving placebo . ALT and AST levels should be monitored every 4 weeks for the first 3 months of treatment, followed by every 3 months for one year, and thereafter, as clinically indicated.

Decreased Neutrophil Counts Decreases in neutrophil counts were observed in patients treated

with ENSPRYNG at a higher incidence than placebo. Neutrophil counts should be monitored 4 to 8 weeks after initiation of therapy, and thereafter at regular clinically determined intervals.

Hypersensitivity Reactions Hypersensitivity reactions, including rash, urticaria, and fatal anaphylaxis, have occurred

with other interleukin-6 receptor antagonists.

Pregnancy Safety for Enspryng

Pregnancy Pregnancy Exposure Registry There is a pregnancy exposure registry that monitors pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to ENSPRYNG during pregnancy. Healthcare providers are encouraged to register patients and pregnant women are encouraged to register themselves by calling 1-833-277-9338. Risk Summary There are no adequate data on the developmental risk associated with the use of ENSPRYNG in pregnant women. In an animal reproduction study, no adverse effects on maternal animals or fetal development were observed in pregnant monkeys and their offspring, with administration of satralizumab-mwge at doses up to 50 mg/kg/week (see Data ). In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defect and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2 – 4% and 15 – 20%, respectively.

The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. Clinical Considerations Fetal/neonatal adverse reactions Monoclonal antibodies are increasingly transported across the placenta as pregnancy progresses, with the largest amount transferred during the third trimester. Risks and benefits should be considered prior to administering live or live-attenuated vaccines to infants exposed to ENSPRYNG in utero . Data Animal Data Weekly subcutaneous administration of satralizumab-mwge (0, 2, or 50 mg/kg) to monkeys throughout pregnancy resulted in no adverse effects on postnatal development of the offspring; however, immune function was impaired in offspring at both doses.

Plasma exposures (C ave ) in dams at the low and high doses were approximately 3 and 100 times, respectively, that in humans at the recommended monthly maintenance dose of 120 mg.

Pediatric Use of Enspryng

Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.

Contraindications for Enspryng

is contraindicated in patients with: A known hypersensitivity to satralizumab or any of the inactive ingredients Active Hepatitis B infection Active or untreated latent tuberculosis Known hypersensitivity to satralizumab or any of the inactive ingredients Active Hepatitis B infection Active or untreated latent tuberculosis

Clinical Studies of Enspryng

The efficacy of ENSPRYNG for the treatment of NMOSD in adult patients was established in two studies. Study 1 was a randomized (2:1), placebo-controlled trial in 95 patients without concurrent IST (Study 1, NCT02073279) in which 64 patients were anti-AQP4 antibody positive and 31 patients were anti-AQP4 antibody negative. Study 2 was a randomized (1:1), placebo-controlled trial in 76 adult patients with concurrent IST (Study 2, NCT02028884). Of these, 52 adult patients were anti-AQP4 antibody positive and 24 adult patients were anti-AQP4 antibody negative.

Patients met the following eligibility criteria: Study 1: Clinical evidence of 1 relapse in the previous 12 months Study 2: Clinical evidence of at least 2 relapses in the previous 2 years, at least one of which must have occurred in the previous year EDSS score of 0 to 6.5 (both studies) Study 1: Patients were excluded if previously treated with IST within an interval specified for each such therapy Study 2: One of the following baseline treatments at a stable dose as a monotherapy for 8 weeks prior to baseline: azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, oral corticosteroids In Study 1, 41 anti-AQP4 antibody positive adult patients were randomized to and received ENSPRYNG and 23 received placebo. Females accounted for 76% of the ENSPRYNG group and 96% of the placebo group. The remaining baseline demographic characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups.

The mean age was 44 years. Fifty percent were White, 22% were Black or African-American, and 20% were Asian. The mean EDSS score was 3.8. In Study 2, 26 anti-AQP4 antibody positive adult patients were randomized to and received ENSPRYNG and 26 received placebo.

All patients were receiving either concurrent azathioprine (42%), oral corticosteroids (52%), or mycophenolate mofetil (6%) during the trial. The baseline demographic and disease characteristics were balanced between the treatment groups. Females accounted for 100% of the study population.

Forty-six percent of patients were White and 52% were Asian. The mean age was 46 years. The mean EDSS score was 4.0. All potential relapses were adjudicated by a blinded Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC). The primary efficacy endpoint for both studies was the time to the first CEC-confirmed relapse.

In Study 1, the time to the first CEC-confirmed relapse was significantly longer in ENSPRYNG-treated patients compared to patients who received placebo (risk reduction 55%; hazard ratio 0.45; p = 0.0184). In the anti-AQP4 antibody positive population, there was a 74% risk reduction; hazard ratio 0.26; p = 0.0014 ( Table 5 ; Figure 1 ). There was no evidence of a benefit in the anti-AQP4 antibody negative patients. In Study 2, the time to the first CEC-confirmed relapse was significantly longer in patients treated with ENSPRYNG compared to patients who received placebo (risk reduction 62%; hazard ratio 0.38; p = 0.0184). In the anti-AQP4 antibody positive population, there was a 78% risk reduction; hazard ratio 0.22; p = 0.0143 ( Table 5 ; Figure 2 ). There was no evidence of a benefit in the anti-AQP4 antibody negative patients. Table 5 Efficacy Results from Study 1 and Study 2 in anti-AQP4 Antibody Positive NMOSD Patients Study 1 Study 2 ENSPRYNG N=41 Placebo N=23 ENSPRYNG + IST IST = immunosuppressant therapy N= 26 Placebo + IST N=26 Time to Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC)-Determined Relapse (Primary Efficacy Endpoint) Number (%) of Patients with Relapse 9 13 3 11 Hazard Ratio (95% CI) 0.26 0.22 p-value 0.0014 0.0143 Risk Reduction 74% 78% Proportion of Protocol Defined Relapse-Free Patients at 96 Weeks 76.5% 41.1% 91.1% 56.8% Figure 1 Study 1: Time to First CEC-Determined NMOSD Relapse in the Randomized Controlled Period in the ITT Population Anti-AQP4 Antibody Positive Patients Figure 2 Study 2: Time to First CEC-Determined NMOSD Relapse in the Randomized Controlled Period in the ITT Population Anti-AQP4 Antibody Positive Patients Figure 1 Figure 2

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Enspryng?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Enspryng Prices