Dysport Drug Information
Generic name: BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A
Acetylcholine Release Inhibitor [EPC] Neuromuscular Blocker [EPC]
Uses of Dysport
Cervical Dystonia
DYSPORT is indicated for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults.
Glabellar Lines
DYSPORT is indicated for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with procerus and corrugator muscle activity in adults less than 65 years of age.
Spasticity
DYSPORT is indicated for the treatment of spasticity in patients 2 years of age and older.
Dosage & Administration of Dysport
| 1 mL | 50 Units |
|---|---|
| 2 mL | 25 Units |
| 2.5 mL | 20 Units |
| -- | -- |
| 5 mL ‡ | 10 Units |
Side Effects of Dysport
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Cervical Dystonia The data described below reflect exposure to DYSPORT in 446 cervical dystonia patients in 7 studies. Of these, two studies were randomized, double-blind, single treatment, placebo-controlled studies with subsequent optional open-label treatment in which dose optimization (250 to 1000 Units per treatment) over the course of 5 treatment cycles was allowed.
The population was almost entirely Caucasian (99%) with a median age of 51 years (range 18–82 years). Most patients (87%) were less than 65 years of age; 58.4% were women. Common Adverse Reactions The most commonly reported adverse reactions (occurring in 5% or more of patients who received 500 Units of DYSPORT in the placebo-controlled clinical trials) in cervical dystonia patients were: muscular weakness, dysphagia, dry mouth, injection site discomfort, fatigue, headache, musculoskeletal pain, dysphonia, injection site pain and eye disorders (consisting of blurred vision, diplopia, and reduced visual acuity and accommodation). Other than injection site reactions, most adverse reactions became noticeable about one week after treatment and lasted several weeks. The rates of adverse reactions were higher in the combined controlled and open-label experience than in the placebo-controlled trials.
During the clinical studies, two patients (<1%) experienced adverse reactions leading to withdrawal. One patient experienced disturbance in attention, eyelid disorder, feeling abnormal and headache, and one patient experienced dysphagia. Table 7 compares the incidence of the most frequent adverse reactions from a single treatment cycle of 500 Units of DYSPORT compared to placebo.
Table 7: Most Common Adverse Reactions (≥ 5%) and Greater than Placebo in the Pooled, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase of Clinical Trials in Patients with Cervical Dystonia Adverse Reactions DYSPORT 500 Units (N=173) Placebo (N=182) % % Any Adverse Reaction 61 51 General disorders and administration site conditions Injection site discomfort 13 8 Fatigue 12 10 Injection site pain 5 4 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Muscular weakness 16 4 Musculoskeletal pain 7 3 Gastrointestinal disorders Dysphagia 15 4 Dry Mouth 13 7 Nervous system disorders Headache 11 9 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Dysphonia 6 2 Eye Disorders The following preferred terms were reported: vision blurred, diplopia, visual acuity reduced, eye pain, eyelid disorder, accommodation disorder, dry eye, eye pruritus. 7 2 Dose-response relationships for common adverse reactions in a randomized multiple fixed-dose study in which the total dose was divided between two muscles (the sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis) are shown in Table 8. Table 8: Common Adverse Reactions by Dose in Fixed-dose Study in Patients with Cervical Dystonia Adverse Reactions DYSPORT Dose 250 Units % 500 Units % 1000 Units % Placebo % Any Adverse Reaction 37 65 83 30 Dysphagia 21 29 39 5 Dry Mouth 21 18 39 10 Muscular Weakness 11 12 56 0 Injection Site Discomfort 5 18 22 10 Dysphonia 0 18 28 0 Facial Paresis 5 0 11 0 Eye Disorder The following preferred terms were reported: vision blurred, diplopia, visual acuity reduced, eye pain, eyelid disorder, accommodation disorder, dry eye, eye pruritus 0 6 17 0 Injection Site Reactions Injection site discomfort and injection site pain were common adverse reactions following DYSPORT administration. Less Common Adverse Reactions The following adverse reactions were reported less frequently (<5%). Breathing Difficulty Breathing difficulties were reported by approximately 3% of patients following DYSPORT administration and in 1% of placebo patients in clinical trials during the double-blind phase. These consisted mainly of dyspnea.
The median time to onset from last dose of DYSPORT was approximately one week, and the median duration was approximately three weeks. Other adverse reactions with incidences of less than 5% in the DYSPORT 500 Units group in the double-blind phase of clinical trials included dizziness in 3.5% of DYSPORT-treated patients and 1% of placebo-treated patients, and muscle atrophy in 1% of DYSPORT-treated patients and in none of the placebo-treated patients. Laboratory Findings Patients treated with DYSPORT exhibited a small increase from baseline (0.23 mol/L) in mean blood glucose relative to placebo-treated patients.
This was not clinically significant among patients in the development program but could be a factor in patients whose diabetes is difficult to control. Electrocardiographic Findings ECG measurements were only recorded in a limited number of patients in an open-label study without a placebo or active control. This study showed a statistically significant reduction in heart rate compared to baseline, averaging about three beats per minute, observed thirty minutes after injection.
Glabellar Lines In placebo-controlled clinical trials of DYSPORT, the most common adverse reactions(≥2%) following injection of DYSPORT were nasopharyngitis, headache, injection site pain, injection site reaction, upper respiratory tract infection, eyelid edema, eyelid ptosis, sinusitis, nausea, and blood present in urine. Table 9 reflects exposure to DYSPORT in 398 patients 19 to 75 years of age who were evaluated in the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies that assessed the use of DYSPORT for the temporary improvement in the appearance of glabellar lines. Adverse reactions of any cause occurred in 48% of the DYSPORT-treated patients and 33% of the placebo-treated patients.
Table 9: Most Common Adverse Reactions with > 1% Incidence in Pooled, Placebo-Controlled Trials for Glabellar Lines Adverse Reactions by Body System DYSPORT (N=398) % Patients who received treatment with placebo and DYSPORT are counted in both treatment columns. Placebo (N=496) % Any Adverse Reaction 48 33 Eye Disorders Eyelid Edema Eyelid Ptosis 2 2 0 <1 Gastrointestinal Disorders Nausea 2 1 General Disorders and Administrative Site Conditions Injection Site Pain Injection Site Reaction 3 3 2 < 1 Infections and Infestations Nasopharyngitis Upper Respiratory Tract Infection Sinusitis 10 3 2 4 2 1 Investigations Blood Present in Urine 2 < 1 Nervous System Disorders Headache 9 5 In the clinical trials safety database, where some patients received up to twelve treatments with DYSPORT, adverse reactions were reported for 57% (1425/2491) of patients. The most frequently reported of these adverse reactions were headache, nasopharyngitis, injection site pain, sinusitis, URI, injection site bruising, and injection site reaction (numbness, discomfort, erythema, tenderness, tingling, itching, stinging, warmth, irritation, tightness, swelling). Adverse reactions that occurred after repeated injections in 2–3% of the population included bronchitis, influenza, pharyngolaryngeal pain, cough, contact dermatitis, injection site swelling, and injection site discomfort.
The incidence of eyelid ptosis did not increase in the long-term safety studies with multiple re-treatments at intervals ≥ three months. The majority of the reports of eyelid ptosis were mild to moderate in severity and resolved over several weeks.. ]. Spasticity in Adults Injection Site Reactions Injection site reactions (e.g. pain, bruising, hemorrhage, erythema/hematoma etc.) have occurred following administration of DYSPORT in adults treated for spasticity. Upper Limb Spasticity in Adults Table 10 lists the adverse reactions that occurred in ≥ 2% of patients in any DYSPORT dose group and more frequent than placebo in double-blind studies evaluating the treatment of upper limb spasticity in adults.
The most common adverse reactions (≥ 4%) in any DYSPORT dose group was muscular weakness. Table 10: Most Common Adverse Reactions Observed in at Least 2% of Patients Treated in Pooled, Double-Blind Trials of Adult Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity Reported More Frequently than with Placebo Adverse Reaction DYSPORT Placebo 500 Units (N=197) % 1000 Units (N=194) % (N=279) % Infections and infestations Influenza 1 2 1 Infection 1 2 1 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Muscular weakness 2 4 1 Pain in extremity 0 2 1 Back pain 1 2 1 Nervous system disorders Headache 1 2 1 Convulsion 2 2 1 Syncope 1 2 0 Hypoesthesia 0 2 <1 Partial seizures 0 2 0 General disorders and administration site conditions Fatigue 2 2 0 Asthenia 2 1 <1 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Fall 2 3 2 Injury 2 2 1 Contusion 1 2 <1 Gastrointestinal disorders Diarrhea 1 2 <1 Constipation 0 2 1 Investigation Blood triglycerides increased 2 1 0 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Cough 1 2 1 Vascular disorders Hypertension 1 2 <1 Psychiatric disorders Depression 2 3 1 Less Common Adverse Reactions In a pooled analysis of clinical studies, adverse reactions with an incidence of less than 2% reported in DYSPORT treatment groups included dysphagia 0.5%, gait disturbance 0.5%, hypertonia 0.5%, and sensation of heaviness 0.3%. Lower Limb Spasticity in Adults The data described below reflect exposure to DYSPORT in 255 adults with lower limb spasticity. Of this population, 89% were Caucasian, 66% male, and the median age was 55 years (range 23-77 years). Table 11 lists the adverse reactions that occurred in ≥ 2% of patients in any DYSPORT dose group and more frequent than placebo in the double-blind study evaluating the treatment of lower limb spasticity in adults.
The most common of these adverse reactions (≥ 5%) in any DYSPORT dose group were falls, muscular weakness, and pain in extremity. Table 11: Adverse Reactions Observed in at Least 2% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Trial of Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than with Placebo Adverse Reactions Dysport 1000 U (N = 127) % Dysport 1500 U (N = 128) % Placebo (N = 130) % Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Muscular weakness Pain in extremity Arthralgia 2 6 4 7 6 2 3 2 1 Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Fall 9 6 3 Nervous system disorders Headache 0 3 1 Infections and infestations Upper respiratory tract infection 2 1 1 General disorders and administration site conditions Fatigue Influenza-like illness Edema peripheral 1 2 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 Investigations Alanine aminotransferase increase 2 0 1 Gastrointestinal disorders Constipation 0 2 1 Psychiatric disorders Depression Insomnia 2 0 3 2 0 0 In the efficacy and safety studies of DYSPORT for the treatment of lower limb spasticity in adults, muscular weakness was reported more frequently in women (10%) treated with 1500 units of DYSPORT compared to men (5%). Falls were reported more frequently in patients 65 years of age and over. Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Table 12 reflects exposure to DYSPORT in 210 patients, 2 to 17 years of age, who were evaluated in a double blind, active-controlled, multicenter study in patients treated for upper limb spasticity.
The most commonly observed adverse reactions (≥10% of patients) were: upper respiratory tract infection and pharyngitis. Table 12: Adverse Reactions Observed in ≥ 3% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Study of Pediatric Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than Control Group Adverse Reactions Dysport 2 Units/kg 1 (N=70) % Dysport 8 Units/kg (N=70) % Dysport 16 Units/kg (N=70) % Infections and infestations Upper respiratory tract infection Influenza Pharyngitis 2 7 1 9 9 1 6 11 3 10 Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea 0 3 1 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue diorders Muscular weakness 1 4 6 Nervous system disorders Headache Epilepsy 0 1 6 0 3 4 1 Low dose active comparator arm 2 Includes pharyngitis, pharyngitis streptococcal, pharyngotosilitis Additional adverse reactions occurring below 3% and considered to be drug related include: myalgia, pain in extremity, fatigue, influenza-like illness, injection site eczema, injection site bruising, injection site rash, injection site pain, and injection site swelling. Lower Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Table 13 reflects exposure to DYSPORT in 160 patients, 2 to 17 years of age, who were evaluated in the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study that assessed the use of DYSPORT for the treatment of unilateral or bilateral lower limb spasticity in pediatric cerebral palsy patients.
The most commonly observed adverse reactions (≥ 10% of patients) are: upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, influenza, pharyngitis, cough and pryrexia. Table 13: Adverse Reactions Observed in ≥ 4% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Trial of Pediatric Patients with Lower Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than with Placebo Adverse Reactions Unilteral Bilateral Dysport 10 units/kg (N=43) % Dysport 15 units/kg (N=50) % Dysport 20 units/kg (N=37) % Dysport 30 units/kg (N=30) % Placebo (N=79) % Infections and Infestations Nasopharyngitis 9 12 16 10 5 Bronchitis 0 0 8 7 3 Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders Cough 7 6 14 10 6 General disorders and administration site conditions Pyrexia 7 12 8 7 5 Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Pain in extremity 0 2 5 7 5 Nervous system disorders Convulsion/Epilepsy 7 4 0 7 0
Immunogenicity As with all therapeutic proteins, there is a potential for immunogenicity.
The incidence of antibody formation is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. In addition, the observed incidence of antibody positivity in an assay may be influenced by several factors including assay methodology, sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease. For these reasons, comparison of the incidence of antibodies across products in this class may be misleading.
Cervical Dystonia About 3% of subjects developed antibodies (binding or neutralizing) over time with DYSPORT treatment. Glabellar Lines Testing for antibodies to DYSPORT was performed for 1554 subjects who had up to nine cycles of treatment. Two subjects (0.13%) tested positive for binding antibodies at baseline.
Three additional subjects tested positive for binding antibodies after receiving DYSPORT treatment. None of the subjects tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. Spasticity in Adults Upper Limb Spasticity From 230 subjects treated with DYSPORT and tested for the presence of binding antibodies, 5 subjects were positive at baseline and 17 developed antibodies after treatment.
Among those 17 subjects, 10 subjects developed neutralizing antibodies. An additional 51 subjects from a separate repeat-dose study were tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies only. None of the subjects tested positive.
In total, from the 281 subjects treated in the long-term studies and tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies, 3.6% developed neutralizing antibodies after treatment. In the presence of binding and neutralizing antibodies to DYSPORT some patients continue to experience clinical benefit. Lower Limb Spasticity From 367 subjects treated with DYSPORT and tested for the presence of binding antibodies, 4 subjects were positive at baseline and 2 developed binding antibodies after treatment.
No subjects developed neutralizing antibodies. An additional 85 subjects from two separate studies were tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies only. One subject tested positive for the presence of neutralizing antibodies.
In total, from the 452 subjects treated in with DYSORT and tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies, 0.2% developed neutralizing antibodies after treatment. Spasticity in Pediatric Patients 2 Years of Age or Older Upper Limb Spasticity From 178 subjects treated with DYSPORT for up to 4 treatment cycles and tested for the presence of binding antibodies at baseline and end of study, 7 subjects previously receiving botulinum toxin injections had binding antibodies after treatment. Among those 7 subjects, 4 subjects (2.3%) developed neutralizing antibodies when tested in the mice bioassay.
In the presence of binding and/or neutralizing antibodies to DYSPORT some patients continue to experience clinical benefit. Lower Limb Spasticity From 226 subjects treated with DYSPORT and tested for the presence of binding antibodies, 5 subjects previously receiving botulinum toxins were positive at baseline and 9 patients developed binding antibodies after injections. Among those 9 subjects, 3 subjects developed neutralizing antibodies, while one subject developed neutralizing antibodies from the 5 subjects testing positive for binding antibodies at baseline who previously received botulinum toxin injections.
From a separate repeat-dose study, 203 subjects were tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies. Two subjects were positive for neutralizing antibodies at baseline and 5 subjects developed neutralizing antibodies after treatments. In total, from the 429 patients tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies, 2.1% developed neutralizing antibodies after treatment.
In the presence of binding and neutralizing antibodies to DYSPORT, some patients continued to experience clinical benefit.
Postmarketing Experience
Because adverse reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of DYSPORT: vertigo, photophobia, influenza-like illness, amyotrophy, muscle atrophy, burning sensation, facial paresis, hypoesthesia, erythema, dry eye, and excessive granulation tissue. Hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis have been reported.
Warnings & Cautions for Dysport
Spread of Toxin Effect Postmarketing safety data from
DYSPORTand other approved botulinum toxins suggest that botulinum toxin effects may, in some cases, be observed beyond the site of local injection. The symptoms are consistent with the mechanism of action of botulinum toxin and may include asthenia, generalized muscle weakness, diplopia, blurred vision, ptosis, dysphagia, dysphonia, dysarthria, urinary incontinence and breathing difficulties. These symptoms have been reported hours to weeks after injection.
Swallowing and breathing difficulties can be life-threatening and there have been reports of death related to spread of toxin effects. The risk of symptoms is probably greatest in children treated for spasticity but symptoms can also occur in adults treated for spasticity and other conditions, particularly in those patients who have underlying conditions that would predispose them to these symptoms. In unapproved uses and approved indications, symptoms consistent with spread of toxin effect have been reported at doses comparable to or lower than the maximum recommended total dose.
Lack of Interchangeability between Botulinum Toxin Products
The potency Units of DYSPORT are specific to the preparation and assay method utilized. They are not interchangeable with other preparations of botulinum toxin products and, therefore, units of biological activity of DYSPORT cannot be compared to or converted into units of any other botulinum toxin products assessed with any other specific assay method.
Hypersensitivity Reactions Serious hypersensitivity reactions have been reported with
DYSPORT. Hypersensitivity reactions include anaphylaxis, serum sickness, urticaria, soft tissue edema, and dyspnea. If such a serious hypersensitivity reaction occurs, discontinue further injection of DYSPORT and institute appropriate medical therapy immediately.
Dysphagia and Breathing Difficulties Treatment with
DYSPORT and other botulinum toxin products can result in swallowing or breathing difficulties. Patients with pre-existing swallowing or breathing difficulties may be more susceptible to these complications. In most cases, this is a consequence of weakening of muscles in the area of injection that are involved in breathing or swallowing.
When distant effects occur, additional respiratory muscles may be involved . Deaths as a complication of severe dysphagia have been reported after treatment with botulinum toxin. Dysphagia may persist for several weeks and require use of a feeding tube to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration. Aspiration may result from severe dysphagia and is a particular risk when treating patients in whom swallowing or respiratory function is already compromised.
Treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxins may weaken neck muscles that serve as accessory muscles of ventilation. This may result in a critical loss of breathing capacity in patients with respiratory disorders who may have become dependent upon these accessory muscles. There have been post-marketing reports of serious breathing difficulties, including respiratory failure.
Patients treated with botulinum toxin may require immediate medical attention should they develop problems with swallowing, speech or respiratory disorders. These reactions can occur within hours to weeks after injection with botulinum toxin.
Facial Anatomy in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines Caution should be exercised
when administering DYSPORT to patients with surgical alterations to the facial anatomy, marked facial asymmetry, inflammation at the injection site(s), ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, thick sebaceous skin or the inability to substantially lessen glabellar lines by physically spreading them apart . Do not exceed the recommended dosage and frequency of administration of DYSPORT. In clinical trials, subjects who received a higher dose of DYSPORT had an increased incidence of eyelid ptosis.
Dry Eye with the Treatment of Glabellar Lines Dry eye has been
reported with the use of DYSPORT in the treatment of glabellar lines. Reduced tear production, reduced blinking, and corneal disorders, may occur with use of botulinum toxins, including DYSPORT. If symptoms of dry eye (e.g., eye irritation, photophobia, or visual changes) persist, consider referring patient to an opththalmologist.
Pre-existing Neuromuscular Disorders Individuals with peripheral motor neuropathic diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
or neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome) should be monitored particularly closely when given botulinum toxin. Patients with neuromuscular disorders may be at increased risk of clinically significant effects including severe dysphagia and respiratory compromise from typical doses of DYSPORT .
Human Albumin and Transmission of Viral Diseases
This product contains albumin, a derivative of human blood. Based on effective donor screening and product manufacturing processes, it carries an extremely remote risk for transmission of viral diseases and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). There is a theoretical risk for transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), but if that risk actually exists, the risk of transmission would also be considered extremely remote. No cases of transmission of viral diseases, CJD, or vCJD have ever been identified for licensed albumin or albumin contained in other licensed products.
Intradermal Immune Reaction
The possibility of an immune reaction when injected intradermally is unknown. The safety of DYSPORT for the treatment of hyperhidrosis has not been established. DYSPORT is approved only for intramuscular injection. 5.10 Pre-existing Conditions at the Injection Site Caution should be exercised when DYSPORT is used where the targeted muscle shows excessive weakness or atrophy.
Drug Interactions with Dysport
Aminoglycosides and Other Agents Interfering with Neuromuscular Transmission Co-administration of
DYSPORT and aminoglycosides or other agents interfering with neuromuscular transmission (e.g., curare-like agents) should only be performed with caution because the effect of the botulinum toxin may be potentiated. If co-administered, observe the patient closely.
Anticholinergic Drugs Use of anticholinergic drugs after administration of
DYSPORT may potentiate systemic anticholinergic effects such as blurred vision.
Other Botulinum Neurotoxin Products
The effect of administering botulinum neurotoxin products including DYSPORT, at the same time or within several months of each other is unknown. Excessive weakness may be exacerbated by another administration of botulinum toxin prior to the resolution of the effects of a previously administered botulinum toxin.
Muscle Relaxants Excessive weakness may also be exaggerated by administration of a
muscle relaxant before or after administration of DYSPORT.
Pregnancy Safety for Dysport
Units/kg (less than maximum recommended human on a body weight basis).
In a study in which pregnant rabbits received daily intramuscular injections of DYSPORT® (0.3, 3.3 or
Units/kg) on gestation days 6 through 19 or intermittently (13.3 Units/kg on
gestation days 6 and 13 only) during organogenesis, no embryofetal data were available at the highest dose administered daily (
Units/kg) because of premature death in all does at that dose. At
the lower daily doses or with intermittent dosing, no adverse developmental effects were observed. All dosed for which data were available are less than the MRHD on a body weight basis. In a study in which pregnant rats received 6 weekly intramuscular injections of DYSPORT (4.4, 11.1, 22.2, or 44 Units/kg) beginning on day 6 of gestation and continuing through parturition to weaning, an increase in stillbirths was observed at the highest dose tested, which was maternally toxic.
The no-effect dose for pre- and post-natal development toxicity was
Units/kg (similar to the
MRHD).
Pediatric Use of Dysport
Females and Males of Reproductive Potential Infertility In rats, DYSPORT produced adverse effects on mating behavior and fertility.
Contraindications for Dysport
- is contraindicated in patients with: Known hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin products, cow's milk protein, or to any of the components in the formulation [ see Warnings and Precautions (5.3) ] . This product may contain trace amounts of cow's milk protein [ see Description (11) ] . Infection at the proposed injection site(s).
- Hypersensitivity to:
- any botulinum toxin product or excipients ( 4 , 5.3 )
- cow's milk protein ( 4 , 5.3 )
- Infection at the proposed injection site(s) ( 4 )
Overdosage Information for Dysport
Excessive doses of DYSPORT may be expected to produce neuromuscular weakness with a variety of symptoms. Respiratory support may be required where excessive doses cause paralysis of respiratory muscles. In the event of overdose, the patient should be medically monitored for symptoms of excessive muscle weakness or muscle paralysis.
Symptomatic treatment may be necessary. Symptoms of overdose are likely not to be present immediately following injection. Should accidental injection or oral ingestion occur, the person should be medically supervised for several weeks for signs and symptoms of excessive muscle weakness or paralysis.
There is no significant information regarding overdose from clinical studies. In the event of overdose, antitoxin raised against botulinum toxin is available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, GA. However, the antitoxin will not reverse any botulinum toxin-induced effects already apparent by the time of antitoxin administration. In the event of suspected or actual cases of botulinum toxin poisoning, please contact your local or state Health Department to process a request for antitoxin through the CDC. If you do not receive a response within 30 minutes, please contact the CDC directly at 770-488-7100. More information can be obtained at https://www.cdc.gov/laboratory/drugservice/index.html.
Clinical Studies of Dysport
Cervical Dystonia
The efficacy of DYSPORT was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, parallel-group studies in treatment-naive cervical dystonia patients. The principal analyses from these trials provide the primary demonstration of efficacy involving 252 patients (121 on DYSPORT, 131 on placebo) with 36% male and 64% female. Ninety-nine percent of the patients were Caucasian.
In both placebo-controlled studies (Study 1 and Study 2), a dose of 500 Units of DYSPORT was given by intramuscular injection divided among two to four affected muscles. These studies were followed by long-term open-label extensions that allowed titration in 250 Unit steps to doses in a range of 250 to 1000 Units, after the initial dose of 500 Units. In the extension studies, re-treatment was determined by clinical need after a minimum of 12 weeks.
The median time to re-treatment was 14 weeks and 18 weeks for the 75 th percentile. The primary assessment of efficacy was based on the total Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) change from baseline at Week 4 for both studies. The scale evaluates the severity of dystonia, patient-perceived disability from dystonia, and pain.
The adjusted mean change from baseline in the TWSTRS total score was statistically significantly greater for the DYSPORT group than the placebo group at Weeks 4 in both studies (see Table 14). Table 14: TWSTRS Total Score Efficacy Outcome from the Phase 3 Cervical Dystonia Studies Intent to Treat Population Study 1 Study 2 DYSPORT 500 Units N=55 Placebo N=61 DYSPORT 500 Units N=37 Placebo N=43 Baseline (week 0) Mean (SD) 43.8 45.8 45.1
Week 4 Mean (SD) Change from Baseline Change from baseline is expressed
as adjusted least square mean (SE) 30.0 -15.6 40.2 -6.7 35.2 -9.6 42.4 -3.7 treatment difference 95% confidence interval -
Significant at p-value < 0.05 -5.9 Week 8 Mean (SD) Change from
Baseline 29.2 -14.7 39.6 -5.9 treatment difference 95% confidence interval -
Analyses by gender, weight, geographic region, underlying pain, cervical dystonia severity at
baseline and history of treatment with botulinum toxin did not show any meaningful differences between groups. Table 15 indicates the average DYSPORT dose, and percentage of total dose, injected into specific muscles in the pivotal clinical trials. Table 15: DYSPORT 500 Units starting dose (units and % of the total dose) by Unilateral Muscle Injected During Double-blind Pivotal Phase 3 studies 2 and 1 Combined Number of patients injected per muscle Total number of patients in combined studies 2 and 1 who received initial treatment = 121. DYSPORT Dose Injected Percentage of the total DYSPORT Dose Injected Median (min, max) 75th percentile Median (min, max) 75th percentile Sternocleidomastoid 90 125 Units 150 Units 26.5% 30.0% Splenius capitis 85 200 Units 250 Units 40.0% 50.0% Trapezius 50
Units 150 Units 20.6% 30.0% Levator scapulae 35 105.3 Units 125 Units
21.1% 25.0% Scalenus (medius and anterior) 26
Units 150 Units 23.1% 30.0% Semispinalis capitis 21 131.6 Units 175 Units
29.4% 35.0% Longissimus 3 150 Units 200 Units 30.0% 40.0%
Glabellar Lines Three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical studies evaluated the efficacy of
DYSPORT for use in the temporary improvement of the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines. These three studies enrolled healthy adults (ages 19-75) with glabellar lines of at least moderate severity at maximum frown. Subjects were excluded if they had marked ptosis, deep dermal scarring, or a substantial inability to lessen glabellar lines, even by physically spreading them apart.
The subjects in these studies received either DYSPORT or placebo. The total dose was delivered in equally divided aliquots to specified injection sites (see Figure 1 ). Investigators and subjects assessed efficacy at maximum frown by using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe). Overall treatment success was defined as post-treatment glabellar line severity of none or mild with at least 2 grade improvement from Baseline for the combined investigator and subject assessments (composite assessment) on Day 30 (see Table 16). Additional endpoints for each of the studies were post-treatment glabellar line severity of none or mild with at least a 1 grade improvement from Baseline for the separate investigator and subject assessments on Day 30. After completion of the randomized studies, subjects were offered participation in a two-year, open-label re-treatment study to assess the safety of multiple treatments. Table 16: Treatment Success at Day 30 (None or Mild with at least a 2 Grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown for the combined Investigator and Subject Assessments (Composite)) 2 Grade Improvement Study DYSPORT n/N (%) Placebo n/N (%) GL-1 58/105 (55%) 0/53 (0%) GL-2 37/71 (52%) 0/71 (0%) GL-3 120/200 (60%) 0/100 (0%) Treatment with DYSPORT reduced the severity of glabellar lines for up to four months.
Study GL-1 Study GL-1 was a single-dose, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study in which 158 previously untreated subjects received either placebo or 50 Units of DYSPORT, administered in five aliquots of 10 Units (see Figure 1 ). Subjects were followed for 180 days. The mean age was 43 years; most of the subjects were women (85%), and predominantly Caucasian (49%) or Hispanic (47%). At Day 30, 55% of DYSPORT-treated subjects achieved treatment success: a composite 2 grade improvement of glabellar line severity at maximum frown ( Table 16). In study GL-1, the reduction of glabellar line severity at maximum frown was greater at Day 30 in the DYSPORT group compared to the placebo group as assessed by both Investigators and subjects (Table 17). Table 17: GL-1: Investigators' and Subjects' Assessment of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild) Investigators' Assessment Subjects' Assessment Day DYSPORT N=105 Placebo N=53 DYSPORT N=105 Placebo N=53 14 90% 95 17% 9 77% 81 9% 5 30 88% 92 4% 2 74% 78 9% 5 60 64% 67 2% 1 60% 63 6% 3 90 43% 45 6% 3 36% 38 6% 3 120 23% 24 4% 2 19% 20 6% 3 150 9% 9 2% 1 8% 8 4% 2 180 6% 6 0% 0 7% 7 8% 4 Study GL-2 Study GL-2 was a repeat-dose, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized study. The study was initiated with two or three open-label treatment cycles of 50 Units of DYSPORT administered in five aliquots of 10 Units DYSPORT (see Figure 1 ). After the open-label treatments, subjects were randomized to receive either placebo or 50 Units of DYSPORT. Subjects could have received up to four treatments through the course of the study.
Efficacy was assessed in the final randomized treatment cycle. The study enrolled 311 subjects into the first treatment cycle and 142 subjects were randomized into the final treatment cycle. Overall, the mean age was 47 years; most of the subjects were women (86%) and predominantly Caucasian (80%). At Day 30, 52% of DYSPORT - treated subjects achieved treatment success: a composite 2 grade improvement of glabellar line severity at maximum frown (see Table 16). The proportion of responders in the final treatment cycle was comparable to the proportion of responders in all prior treatment cycles.
After the final repeat treatment with DYSPORT, the reduction of glabellar line severity at maximum frown was greater at Day 30 in the DYSPORT group compared to the placebo group as assessed by both Investigators and subjects (see Table 18). Table 18: GL-2 Investigators' and Subjects' Assessments of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild) Investigators' Assessment Subjects' Assessment Day DYSPORT N=71 Placebo N=71 DYSPORT N=71 Placebo N=71 30 85% 60 4% 3 79% 56 1% 1 Study GL-3 Study GL-3 was a single-dose, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study in which 300 previously untreated subjects received either placebo or 50 Units of DYSPORT, administered in five aliquots of 10 Units (see Figure 1 ). Subjects were followed for 150 days. The mean age was 44 years; most of the subjects were women (87%), and predominantly Caucasian (75%) or Hispanic (18%). At Day 30, 60% of DYSPORT-treated subjects achieved treatment success: a composite 2 grade improvement of glabellar line severity at maximum frown (see Table 16). In study GL-3, the reduction of glabellar line severity at maximum frown was greater at Day 30 in the DYSPORT group compared to the placebo group as assessed by both Investigators and subjects (see Table 19). Table 19: GL-3 Investigators' and Subjects' Assessment of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild) Investigators' Assessment Subjects' Assessment Day DYSPORT N=200 Placebo N=100 DYSPORT N=200 Placebo N=100 14 83% 166 5% 5 83% 165 2% 2 30 86% 171 0% 0 82% 163 2% 2 60 75% 150 1% 1 65% 130 4% 4 90 51% 102 1% 1 46% 91 2% 2 120 29% 58 1% 1 31% 61 3% 3 150 16% 32 1% 1 16% 31 3% 3 Geriatric Subjects In GL1, GL2, and GL3, there were 8 subjects aged 65 and older who were randomized to DYSPORT 50 Units in 5 equal aliquots of 10 Units or placebo. None of the geriatric DYSPORT subjects were a treatment success at maximum frown at Day 30.
Spasticity in Adults Upper Limb Spasticity
The efficacy and safety of DYSPORT for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in adults was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that included 238 patients (159 DYSPORT and 79 placebo) with upper limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≥2 in the primary targeted muscle group for toxin-naive patients or MAS score ≥3 in the primary targeted muscle group for toxin non-naive patients at least 4 months after the last botulinum toxin injection, of any serotype) who were at least 6 months post-stroke or post-traumatic brain injury. The median age of the patients in this study was 55 years (range 18 to 78 years), 64% were male, and 86% were Caucasian. DYSPORT 500 Units (N=80), DYSPORT 1000 Units (N=79), or placebo (N=79) was injected intramuscularly into the affected upper limb muscles.
After injection of the primary targeted muscle groups (PTMG), the remainder of the dose was injected into at least two additional upper limb muscles determined by the patient's individual presentation. Table 20 provides the mean and range of DYSPORT doses injected and the number of injections into specific muscles of the upper limb. Table 20: DYSPORT Dose Injected and Number of Injections per Muscle in Adults with Upper Limb Spasticity Muscle DYSPORT Treatment Group Number of Patients Mean DYSPORT Units injected (Min, Max) Number of Injection Sites Median Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP)* 500 U 1000 U 54 65
Units (50 to 100) 195.5 Units (100 to 300) 1, 2, Flexor
digitorum superficialis (FDS)* 500 U 1000 U 63 73
Units (50 to 100) 196.8 Units (100 to 300) 2, 2, Flexor
carpi radialis (FCR)* 500 U 1000 U 57 57
Units (25 to 100) 178.1 Units (80 to 300) 1, 1, Flexor
carpi ulnaris (FCU)* 500 U 1000 U 47 49
Units (25 to 180) 171.2 Units (80 to 200) 1, 1, Brachialis*
500 U 1000 U 60 43
Units (50 to 200) 321.4 Units (100 to 300) 2, 2, Brachioradialis*
500 U 1000 U 42 28
Units (50 to 200) 172.1Units (50 to 200) 1, 1, Biceps Brachii
(BB) 500 U 1000 U 28 19
Units (50 to 200) 207.4 Units (100 to 400) 2, 2, Pronator
Teres 500 U 1000 U 14 30
Units (45 to 200) 157.3 Units (80 to 200) 1, 1, *Primary
Targeted Muscle Group The co-primary efficacy variables were muscle tone assessed by the MAS at the primary targeted muscle group at week 4 and the Physician Global Assessment (PGA; ranges from -4 = marked worse to +4 = marked improved) at week 4 (see Table 21). Table 21: Primary Endpoints (PTMG MAS and PGA) and MAS by Muscle Group at Week 4 in Adults with Upper Limb Spasticity Placebo (N=79) DYSPORT (500 units) (N=80) (1000 units) (N=79) LS Mean Change from Baseline in PTMG Muscle Tone on the MAS -0.3 -1.2* -1.4* LS Mean PGA of Response to Treatment 0.7 1.4* 1.8* LS Mean Change from Baseline in Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone on the MAS -0.3 (n=54) -1.4 (n=57) -1.6 (n-58) LS Mean Change from Baseline in Finger Flexor Muscle Tone on the MAS -0.3 (n=70) -0.9 (n=66) -1.2 (n=73) LS Mean Change from Baseline in Elbow Flexor Muscle Tone on the MAS -0.3 (n=56) -1.0 (n=61) -1.2 (n=48) LS= Least Square *p≤0.05 Lower Limb Spasticity The efficacy of DYSPORT for the treatment of lower limb spasticity was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that included 381 patients (253 DYSPORT and 128 placebo). Patients had lower limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≥2 in the affected ankle joint for toxin-naive patients, or MAS score ≥3 in the affected ankle joint for toxin non-naive patients) and were at least 6 months post-stroke or post-traumatic brain injury. Table 22 provides the median DYSPORT doses injected and the number of injections into specific muscles of the lower limb as reported in the double-blind study. In the study, the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, and at least one additional lower limb muscle were injected, according to the clinical presentation.
Table 22: DYSPORT Dose Injected and Number of Injections per Muscle in the Lower Limb - Median for the 1000 Unit and 1500 Unit Dose Groups Injected Muscle DYSPORT Units Injected Number of Injection Sites Gastrocnemius Lateral Medial 100 Units to 150 Units 1 100 Units to 150 Units 1 Soleus 333 Units to 500 Units 3 Tibialis posterior 200 Units to 300 Units 2 Flexor digitorum longus 133 Units to 200 Units 1 to 2 Flexor hallucis longus 67 Units to 200 Units 1 The primary efficacy variable was muscle tone assessed by the MAS at the ankle joint at week 4. The first secondary endpoint was the Physician Global Assessment at week 4 (see Table 23). Table 23: Primary Endpoint Change in MAS and the First Secondary Endpoint PGA at Week 4 in Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity LS Mean Change from Baseline on the Modified Ashworth Scale DYSPORT 1000 Units (N=125) DYSPORT 1500 Units (N=128) Placebo (N=128) Week 4 -0.6 -
P‹0.05 -0.5 LS Mean Physician Global Assessment Score Investigator Week 4 0.9
0.9 0.7
Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients
The efficacy of DYSPORT for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in pediatric patients 2 to 17 years of age was evaluated in a double-blind, low-dose controlled, multicenter study (NCT02106351). A total of 208 patients with spasticity because of cerebral palsy who were toxin naïve or non-naïve (66% had prior treatment with botulinum toxin), weighed at least 10 kgs, and had a baseline Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) of grade 2 or greater (99% patients) at the primary targeted muscle groups (PTMG), were enrolled in the modified Intention to Treat population (mITT). Patients received DYSPORT 16 Units/kg (n=70), DYSPORT 8 Units/kg (n=69), or DYSPORT 2 Units/kg (n=69) injected into the upper limb. The elbow flexors and wrist flexors respectively were the PTMG in 57% and in 43% of patients. The median age of the patients in this study was 9 years (range 2 to 17 years; 57% were between 2 and 9 years of age); 60% of patients were male, and 75% were White.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in MAS in the PTMG at Week 6 (see Table 24). The secondary efficacy endpoint was the mean Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score assessed at Week 6 (Table 25). Although PGA scores numerically favored DYSPORT treatment over the low-dose control, the difference was not statistically significant. Table 24: Modified Ashworth Scale Score in the PTMG Change from Baseline at Week 6 in Pediatric Patients with Upper LImb Spasticity (mITT Population) Control Group Treatment Groups DYSPORT 2 U/kg (N=69) DYSPORT 8 U/kg (N=69) DYSPORT 16 U/kg (N=70) Baseline Mean (SD) 3.1 3.1
Week 6 LS a mean change from baseline in
PTMG b on MAS -1.6 -2.0 -
Difference from control in LS a means -0.4 -0.7 p-value c 0.0118
d <0.0001 Week 16 LS a mean change from baseline in PGMG b on MAS -0.9 -1.2 -
Difference from control in LS a means -0.3 d -0.6 d a
LS = Least Square b PTMG=Primary Targeted Muscle Group c p-value is derived from ANCOVA on ranked MAS score change from baseline with treatment, baseline score, age range at baseline, prior botulinum toxin treatment status at baseline, and center as explanatory variables d Nominal p-value <0.05 Table 25: Physician Global Assessment of Treatment Response at Week 6 in Pediatric Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity (mITT Population) Control Group Treatment Group DYSPORT 2 U/kg (N=68) DYSPORT 8 U/kg (N=69) DYSPORT 16 U/kg (N=70) Week 6 Mean score (SD) 1.7 2.0
LS a mean in
PGA 1.8 2.0
Difference from control in LS a mean 0.2 0.2 p-value b 0.2043
0.1880 Week 16 Mean score (SD) 1.7 1.6
LS a mean in
PGA 1.8 1.7
Difference from contron in LS a mean -0.1 0.1 p-value b 0.7001
0.4041 a LS=Least Square b p-value is derived from ANOVA on ranked PGA score with treatment, age range at baseline, prior botulinum toxin treatment status at baseline, and center as explanatory variables Lower Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients The efficacy of DYSPORT for the treatment of lower limb spasticity in patients 2 to 17 years of age was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study. A total of 235 patients with cerebral palsy causing dynamic equinus foot deformity who were toxin-naïve or non-naïve and had a Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) of grade 2 or greater at the ankle plantar flexors were enrolled. Patients received DYSPORT 10 Units/kg/leg (n=79), DYSPORT 15 Units/kg/leg (n=79) or placebo (n=77) injected into the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles (see Table 27). Forty-one percent of patients (n=66) were treated bilaterally and received a total lower limb DYSPORT dose of either 20 Units/kg (n=37) or 30 Units/kg (n=29). The median age of the patients in this study was 5 years (range 2 to 17 years); 60% of patients were male, and 73% were Caucasian.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in MAS in ankle plantar flexor at Week 4; a co-primary endpoint was the mean Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) score at Week 4 (see Table 26). Table 26: MAS and PGA Change from Baseline at Week 4 in Pediatric Patient with Lower Limb Spasticity (ITT Population) Placebo (N=77) DYSPORT 10 Units/kg/leg (N=79) DYSPORT 15 Units/kg/leg (N=79) LS Mean Change from Baseline in Ankle plantar flexor Muscle Tone on the MAS Week 4 -0.5 -0.9* -1.0* Week 12 -0.5 -0.8* -1.0* LS Mean PGA of Response to Treatment Week 4 0.7 1.5* 1.5* Week 12 0.4 0.8* 1.0* LS=Least Square *p‹0.05
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Dysport?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Dysport Prices