Dysport Drug Information

Generic name: BOTULINUM TOXIN TYPE A

Acetylcholine Release Inhibitor [EPC] Neuromuscular Blocker [EPC]

Save on Dysport at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Dysport

Cervical Dystonia DYSPORT is indicated for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults.

Glabellar Lines DYSPORT is indicated for the temporary improvement in the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines associated with procerus and corrugator muscle activity in adults less than 65 years of age.

Spasticity DYSPORT is indicated for the treatment of spasticity in patients 2 years of age and older.

Dosage & Administration of Dysport

Instructions for Safe Use

The potency units of Dysport are not interchangeable with other preparations of botulinum toxin products and, therefore, units of biological activity of Dysport cannot be compared to or converted into units of any other botulinum toxin products assessed with any other specific assay method. Reconstituted Dysport is intended for intramuscular injection only.

Preparation of Dysport Solution for Administration Dysport is supplied as a dry powder, in single-dose 300 Unit and 500 Unit vials, which must be reconstituted with preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP using aseptic technique prior to intramuscular injection. Table 1 provides dilution instructions for the 300 Unit and 500 Unit vials, depending on the desired final concentration. The desired final concentration after dilution varies depending on the indication (see Table 2 for the recommended solution concentration after dilution).

Complete the following steps: Reconstitute a 500 Unit vial of Dysport with 2.5 mL of Preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, gently mix, and set the vital aside. Withdraw 2.5 mL of Preservative-free 0.9 Sodium Chloride Infection, USP into a 5 mL syringe Take the 5 mL syringe with 2.5 ml Preservative-free Sodium Chloride Injection, USP and draw up the Dysport solution from the reconstituted vial without inverting and mix gently. The resulting concentration will be 10 units/0.1 mL Use immediately after reconstitution in the syringe.

Dispose of any unused 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP. Using an appropriately sized sterile syringe, needle and aseptic technique, draw up the required amount of sterile, preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP (see Table 1 ). Insert the needle into the Dysport vial.

The partial vacuum will begin to pull the saline into the vial. Any remaining required saline should be expressed into the vial manually. Do not use the vial if no partial vacuum is observed.

Swirl gently to dissolve. Parenteral drug products should be inspected visually for particulate matter and discoloration prior to administration. Reconstituted Dysport should be a clear, colorless solution, free of particulate matter, otherwise it should not be injected.

Expel any air bubbles in the syringe barrel. Remove the needle used to reconstitute the product and attach an appropriately sized new sterile needle for injection. After reconstitution, Dysport should be used for only one injection session and for only one patient.

Discard any unused portion. Once reconstituted, unused Dysport may be stored in the original container, in a refrigerator at 2°C to 8°C (36°F to 46°F), protected from light for up to 24 hours until time of use. It must be discarded if not used within 24 hours.

Do not freeze reconstituted Dysport. Discard the vial and needle in accordance with local regulations. Table 2: Recommended Solution Concentration and Dosing Range of Dysport by should generally be administered at any single injections site No more than 0.5 mL of Dysport should be administered in any single injection site Further dilution with preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP, may be required to achieve the final volume for injection.

Dosing in Cervical Dystonia

The recommended initial dose of Dysport for the treatment of cervical dystonia in adults is 500 Units given intramuscularly as a divided dose among affected muscles in patients with or without a history of prior treatment with botulinum toxin. (A description of the average Dysport dose and percentage of total dose injected into specific muscles in the pivotal clinical trials can be found in Table 15 of Section 14.1, Clinical Studies – Cervical Dystonia.) Limiting the dose injected into the sternocleidomastoid muscle may reduce the occurrence of dysphagia. Clinical studies with Dysport in cervical dystonia suggest that the peak effect occurs between two and four weeks after injection. Simultaneous guided injection of Dysport with EMG and/or ultrasound may be helpful in locating active muscles.

Dose Modification Where dose modification is necessary for the treatment of cervical dystonia, uncontrolled open-label studies suggest that dose adjustment can be made in 250 Unit steps according to the individual patient's response, with re-treatment every 12 weeks or longer, as necessary, based on return of clinical symptoms. Uncontrolled open-label studies also suggest that the total dose administered in a single treatment should be between 250 Units and 1000 Units. Re-treatment, if needed, should not occur in intervals of less than 12 weeks.

Doses above 1000 Units have not been systematically evaluated.

Dosing in Glabellar Lines

The dose of Dysport for the treatment of glabellar lines in adults is a total of 50 Units given intramuscularly in five equal aliquots of 10 Units each to achieve clinical effect (see Figure 1 ). The clinical effect of Dysport may last up to four months. Repeat dosing in clinical studies demonstrated continued efficacy with up to four repeated administrations.

It should be administered no more frequently than every three months. When used for re-treatment, Dysport should be reconstituted and injected using the same techniques as the initial treatment. Injection Technique Glabellar facial lines arise from the activity of the lateral corrugator and vertical procerus muscles.

These can be readily identified by palpating the tensed muscle mass while having the patient frown. The corrugator depresses the skin creating a "furrowed" vertical line surrounded by tensed muscle (i.e., frown lines). The location, size, and use of the muscles vary markedly among individuals.

Physicians administering Dysport must understand the relevant neuromuscular and/or orbital anatomy of the area involved and any alterations to the anatomy due to prior surgical procedures. Risk of ptosis can be mitigated by careful examination of the upper lid for separation or weakness of the levator palpebrae muscle (true ptosis), identification of lash ptosis, and evaluation of the range of lid excursion while manually depressing the frontalis to assess compensation. In order to reduce the complication of ptosis, the following steps should be taken: Avoid injection near the levator palpebrae superioris, particularly in patients with larger brow depressor complexes.

Medial corrugator injections should be placed at least 1 centimeter above the bony supraorbital ridge. Ensure the injected volume/dose is accurate and where feasible kept to a minimum. Do not inject toxin closer than 1 centimeter above the central eyebrow.

To inject Dysport, advance the needle through the skin into the underlying muscle while applying finger pressure on the superior medial orbital rim. Inject patients with a total of 50 Units in five equally divided aliquots. Using an appropriately sized needle, inject 10 Units of Dysport into each of five sites, two in each corrugator muscle, and one in the procerus muscle (see Figure 1 ).

Figure 1 Figure 1

Dosing in Spasticity in Adults Dosing in initial and subsequent treatment sessions should be tailored to the individual based on the size, number and location of muscles involved, severity of spasticity, the presence of local muscle weakness, the patient's response to previous treatment, and/or adverse reaction history with botulinum toxins. The maximum recommended total dose (upper and lower limb combined) of Dysport for the treatment of spasticity in adults is 1500 Units. Although actual location of the injection sites can be determined by palpation, the use of injection guiding technique (e.g., electromyography, electrical stimulation, or ultrasound) is recommended to target the injection sites.

Upper Limb Spasticity In the clinical trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of Dysport for treatment of upper limb spasticity in adults, doses of 500 Units and 1000 Units were divided among selected muscles at a given treatment session (see Table 3 and Figure 2 ). Table 3: Dysport Dosing by s for Injection for Upper Limb Spasticity in Adults Repeat Dysport treatment should be administered when the effect of a previous injection has diminished, but no sooner than 12 weeks after the previous injection. A majority of patients in clinical studies were retreated between 12-16 weeks; however some patients had a longer duration of response (i.e. 20 weeks).

The degree and pattern of muscle spasticity at the time of re-injection may necessitate alterations in the dose of Dysport and muscles to be injected. Clinical improvement may be expected one week after administration of Dysport.

Dosing in Spasticity in Pediatric Patients

Dysport dosing for spasticity in pediatric patients is based on Units per kilogram of body weight. To calculate the total units of Dysport required for treatment of one limb, select the dose of Dysport in Units/kg and the body weight (kg) of the patient (see Tables 5 and 6). The maximum recommended total dose of Dysport in a single treatment session for spasticity in pediatric patients 2 years or older is 30 Units/kg or 1000 Units in a 3-month interval.

Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients 2 Years of Age and Older In the clinical trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of Dysport for treatment of upper limb spasticity in pediatric patients 2 years of age or older with a weight of at least 10 kg, doses of 8 Units/kg or 16 Units/kg were divided among selected muscles of the target upper limb at a given treatment session (see Table 5 and Figure 4). Table 5 describes the recommended Units/kg dose of Dysport per muscle. The maximum recommended total dose of Dysport administered for treatment of upper limb spasticity must not exceed 16 Units/kg or 640 Units, whichever is lower.

A majority of patients in the clinical study were retreated between 16-28 weeks; however, some patients had a longer duration of response (i.e., 34 weeks or more). However, the total dose of Dysport administered in a 3-month interval must not exceed 15 Units/kg for unilateral lower limb injections, 30 Units/kg for bilateral lower limb injections, or 1000 units, whichever is lower. The total dose administered should be divided between the affected spastic muscles of the lower limb(s).

When possible, the dose should be distributed across more than 1 injection site in any single muscle (see Table 6). Table 6. The safety and effectiveness of Dysport injected into proximal muscles of the lower limb for the treatment of spasticity in pediatric patients has not been established. figure4_upper_limb_pediatric figure4-2_pediatric_spasticity Figure_4_Muscles_Lower_Limb_Spasticity_Pediatric

Table 1: Dilution Instructions for Dysport Vials (500 Units and 300 Units)
Diluent Preservative-free 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP Only per 500 Unit VialResulting Dose Unites per 0.1 mLDIluent per 300 Unit VialResulting Dose Units per 0.1 mL
1 mL50 Units0.6 mL50 Units
2 mL25 Units----
2.5 mL20 Units1.5 mL20 Units
----2.5 mL12 Units
5 mL10 Units3 mL10 Units
Table 2: Recommended Solution Concentration and Dosing Range of Dysport by Indication
IndicationRecommended ConcentrationRecommended Dysport Dose
Cervical Dystonia, Adults50 Units/0.1 mL or 25 Units/0.1 mL500 Units to 1000 Units
Glabellar Lines, Adults12 Units/0.1 mL or 20 Units/0.1 mL50 Units, divided in five equal aliquots of 10 Units (0.08 mL) each or 50 Units, divided in five equal aliquots of 10 Units (0.05 mL) each
Spasticity, Adults*10 Units/0.1 mL or 20 Units/0.1 mLUpper Limb: 500 Units to 1000 Units Lower Limb: 1000 Units to 1500 Units Maximum total dose per treatment session = 1500 Units
Spasticity, Pediatric Patients20 Units/0.1 mL or 50 Units/0.1 mL*Upper Limb: 8 Units/kg to 16 Units/kg per limb Maximum total dose per treatment session = 16 Units/kg or 640 Units, whichever is lower Lower Limb: 10 Units/kg to 15 Units/kg per limb Maximum total dose per treatment session for unilateral limb injections = 15 Units/kg or 1000 Units, whichever is lower Maximum total dose per treatment session for bilateral limb injections = 30 Units/kg or 1000 Units, whichever is lower Maximum total dose per treatment session = 30 Units/kg or 1000 Units, whichever is lower
Table 3: Dysport Dosing by Muscle for Upper Limb Spasticity in Adults
Muscles InjectedRecommended Dose DysportRecommended Number of Injection(s) per Muscle
Flexor carpi radialis (FCR) Flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)100 Units to 200 Units 100 Units to 200 Units1 to 2 1 to 2
Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS)100 Units to 200 Units 100 Units to 200 Units1 to 2 1 to 2
Brachialis Brachioradialis Biceps Brachii (BB) Pronator Teres200 Units to 400 Units 100 Units to 200 Units 200 Units to 400 Units 100 Units to 200 Units1 to 2 1 to 2 1 to 2 1
Table 4: Dysport Dosing by Muscle for Lower Limb Spasticity in Adults
Muscles InjectedRecommended Dysport DoseRecommended Number of Injection Sites per Muscle
Distal Muscles
Gastrocnemius
Medial head100 Units to 150 Units1
Lateral head100 Units to 150 Units1
Soleus330 Units to 500 Units3
Tibialis posterior200 Units to 300 Units2
Flexor digitorum longus130 Units to 200 Units1 to 2
Flexor halluces longus70 Units to 200 Units1
Table 5: Dysport Dosing by Muscle for Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients
MuscleRecommended Dose Range per muscle per upper limb (units/kg Body Weight)Number of injection sites per muscle
Brachialis3 Units/kg to 6 Units/kgUp to 2
Brachioradialis1.5 Units/kg to 3 Units/kg1
Biceps brachii3 Units/kg to 6 Units/kgUp to 2
Pronator teres1 Units/kg to 2 Units/kg1
Prontator quadratus0.5 Unit/kg to 1 Units/kg1
Flexor carpi radialis (FCR)2 Units/kg to 4 Units/kgUp to 2
Flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)1.5 Units/kg to 3 Units/kg1
Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP)1 Units/kg to 2 Units/kg1
Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS)1.5 Units/kg to 3 Units/kgUp to 4
Total dose8 Units/kg to 16 Units/kg in upper limbs (and not exceeding 640 Units)
Table 6. Dysport Dosing by Muscle for Lower Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients
Muscle InjectedRecommended Dysport Dose Range per muscle per leg (Units/kg Body Weight)Recommended number of injections per muscle
Gastrocnemius6 Units/kg to 9 Units/kg the listed individual doses to be injected in the muscles can be used within the range mentioned without exceeding 15 Units/kg total dose for unilateral injection or 30 Units/kg for bilateral injections or 1000 Units whichever is lower.Up to 4
Soleus4 Units/kg to 6 Units/kgUp to 2
Total10 Units/kg to 15 Units/kg divided across both musclesUp to 6

Side Effects of Dysport

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Cervical Dystonia The data described below reflect exposure to Dysport in 446 cervical dystonia patients in 7 studies. Of these, two studies were randomized, double-blind, single treatment, placebo-controlled studies with subsequent optional open-label treatment in which dose optimization (250 to 1000 Units per treatment) over the course of 5 treatment cycles was allowed.

The population was almost entirely Caucasian (99%) with a median age of 51 years (range 18–82 years). Most patients (87%) were less than 65 years of age; 58.4% were women. Common Adverse Reactions The most commonly reported adverse reactions (occurring in 5% or more of patients who received 500 Units of Dysport in the placebo-controlled clinical trials) in cervical dystonia patients were: muscular weakness, dysphagia, dry mouth, injection site discomfort, fatigue, headache, musculoskeletal pain, dysphonia, injection site pain and eye disorders (consisting of blurred vision, diplopia, and reduced visual acuity and accommodation).

Other than injection site reactions, most adverse reactions became noticeable about one week after treatment and lasted several weeks. The rates of adverse reactions were higher in the combined controlled and open-label experience than in the placebo-controlled trials. During the clinical studies, two patients (<1%) experienced adverse reactions leading to withdrawal.

One patient experienced disturbance in attention, eyelid disorder, feeling abnormal and headache, and one patient experienced dysphagia. Table 7 compares the incidence of the most frequent adverse reactions from a single treatment cycle of 500 Units of Dysport compared to placebo. Table 7: Most Common Adverse Reactions (≥ 5%) and Greater than Placebo in the Pooled, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase of Clinical Trials in Patients with Cervical Dystonia 7 2 Dose-response relationships for common adverse reactions in a randomized multiple fixed-dose study in which the total dose was divided between two muscles (the sternocleidomastoid and splenius capitis) are shown in Table 8.

Table 8: Common Adverse Reactions by Dose in Fixed-dose Study in Patients with Cervical Dystonia and injection site pain were common adverse reactions following Dysport administration. Less Common Adverse Reactions The following adverse reactions were reported less frequently (<5%). Breathing Difficulty Breathing difficulties were reported by approximately 3% of patients following Dysport administration and in 1% of placebo patients in clinical trials during the double-blind phase.

These consisted mainly of dyspnea. The median time to onset from last dose of Dysport was approximately one week, and the median duration was approximately three weeks. Other adverse reactions with incidences of less than 5% in the Dysport 500 Units group in the double-blind phase of clinical trials included dizziness in 3.5% of Dysport-treated patients and 1% of placebo-treated patients, and muscle atrophy in 1% of Dysport-treated patients and in none of the placebo-treated patients.

Laboratory Findings Patients treated with Dysport exhibited a small increase from baseline (0.23 mol/L) in mean blood glucose relative to placebo-treated patients. This was not clinically significant among patients in the development program but could be a factor in patients whose diabetes is difficult to control. Electrocardiographic Findings ECG measurements were only recorded in a limited number of patients in an open-label study without a placebo or active control.

This study showed a statistically significant reduction in heart rate compared to baseline, averaging about three beats per minute, observed thirty minutes after injection. Glabellar Lines In placebo-controlled clinical trials of Dysport, the most common adverse reactions(≥2%) following injection of Dysport were nasopharyngitis, headache, injection site pain, injection site reaction, upper respiratory tract infection, eyelid edema, eyelid ptosis, sinusitis, nausea, and blood present in urine. Table 9 reflects exposure to Dysport in 398 patients 19 to 75 years of age who were evaluated in the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical studies that assessed the use of Dysport for the temporary improvement in the appearance of glabellar lines.

Adverse reactions of any cause occurred in 48% of the Dysport-treated patients and 33% of the placebo-treated patients. The most frequently reported of these adverse reactions were headache, nasopharyngitis, injection site pain, sinusitis, URI, injection site bruising, and injection site reaction (numbness, discomfort, erythema, tenderness, tingling, itching, stinging, warmth, irritation, tightness, swelling). Adverse reactions that occurred after repeated injections in 2–3% of the population included bronchitis, influenza, pharyngolaryngeal pain, cough, contact dermatitis, injection site swelling, and injection site discomfort.

The incidence of eyelid ptosis did not increase in the long-term safety studies with multiple re-treatments at intervals ≥ three months. The majority of the reports of eyelid ptosis were mild to moderate in severity and resolved over several weeks. ]. Spasticity in Adults Injection Site Reactions Injection site reactions (e.g. pain, bruising, hemorrhage, erythema/hematoma etc.) have occurred following administration of Dysport in adults treated for spasticity.

Upper Limb Spasticity in Adults Table 10 lists the adverse reactions that occurred in ≥ 2% of patients in any Dysport dose group and more frequent than placebo in double-blind studies evaluating the treatment of upper limb spasticity in adults. The most common adverse reactions (≥ 4%) in any Dysport dose group was muscular weakness. Table 10: Most Common Adverse Reactions Observed in at Least 2% of Patients Treated in Pooled, Double-Blind Trials of Adult Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity Reported More Frequently than with In a pooled analysis of clinical studies, adverse reactions with an incidence of less than 2% reported in Dysport treatment groups included dysphagia 0.5%, gait disturbance 0.5%, hypertonia 0.5%, and sensation of heaviness 0.3%.

Lower Limb Spasticity in Adults The data described below reflect exposure to Dysport in 255 adults with lower limb spasticity. The most common of these adverse reactions (≥ 5%) in any Dysport dose group were falls, muscular weakness, and pain in extremity. Table 11: Adverse Reactions Observed in at Least 2% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Trial of Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than with for the treatment of lower limb spasticity in adults, muscular weakness was reported more frequently in women (10%) treated with 1500 units of Dysport compared to men (5%).

Falls were reported more frequently in patients 65 years of age and over. Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Table 12 reflects exposure to Dysport in 210 patients, 2 to 17 years of age, who were evaluated in a double blind, active-controlled, multicenter study in patients treated for upper limb spasticity. The most commonly observed adverse reactions (≥10% of patients) were: upper respiratory tract infection and pharyngitis.

Table 12: Adverse Reactions Observed in ≥ 3% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Study of Pediatric Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than Control Group 1 Low dose active comparator arm 2 Includes pharyngitis, pharyngitis streptococcal, pharyngotosilitis Additional adverse reactions occurring below 3% and considered to be drug related include: myalgia, pain in extremity, fatigue, influenza-like illness, injection site eczema, injection site bruising, injection site rash, injection site pain, and injection site swelling. Lower Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Table 13 reflects exposure to Dysport in 160 patients, 2 to 17 years of age, who were evaluated in the randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study that assessed the use of Dysport for the treatment of unilateral or bilateral lower limb spasticity in pediatric cerebral palsy patients. Table 13: Adverse Reactions Observed in ≥ 4% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Trial of Pediatric Patients with Lower Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than with Immunogenicity As with all therapeutic proteins, there is a potential for immunogenicity.

The incidence of antibody formation is highly dependent on the sensitivity and specificity of the assay. In addition, the observed incidence of antibody positivity in an assay may be influenced by several factors including assay methodology, sample handling, timing of sample collection, concomitant medications, and underlying disease. For these reasons, comparison of the incidence of antibodies across products in this class may be misleading.

Cervical Dystonia About 3% of subjects developed antibodies (binding or neutralizing) over time with Dysport treatment. Glabellar Lines Testing for antibodies to Dysport was performed for 1554 subjects who had up to nine cycles of treatment. Two subjects (0.13%) tested positive for binding antibodies at baseline.

Three additional subjects tested positive for binding antibodies after receiving Dysport treatment. None of the subjects tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. Spasticity in Adults Upper Limb Spasticity From 230 subjects treated with Dysport and tested for the presence of binding antibodies, 5 subjects were positive at baseline and 17 developed antibodies after treatment.

Among those 17 subjects, 10 subjects developed neutralizing antibodies. An additional 51 subjects from a separate repeat-dose study were tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies only. None of the subjects tested positive.

In total, from the 281 subjects treated in the long-term studies and tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies, 3.6% developed neutralizing antibodies after treatment. In the presence of binding and neutralizing antibodies to Dysport some patients continue to experience clinical benefit. Lower Limb Spasticity From 367 subjects treated with Dysport and tested for the presence of binding antibodies, 4 subjects were positive at baseline and 2 developed binding antibodies after treatment.

No subjects developed neutralizing antibodies. An additional 85 subjects from two separate studies were tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies only. One subject tested positive for the presence of neutralizing antibodies.

In total, from the 452 subjects treated in with DYSORT and tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies, 0.2% developed neutralizing antibodies after treatment. Spasticity in Pediatric Patients 2 Years of Age or Older Upper Limb Spasticity From 178 subjects treated with Dysport for up to 4 treatment cycles and tested for the presence of binding antibodies at baseline and end of study, 7 subjects previously receiving botulinum toxin injections had binding antibodies after treatment. Among those 7 subjects, 4 subjects (2.3%) developed neutralizing antibodies when tested in the mice bioassay.

Lower Limb Spasticity From 226 subjects treated with Dysport and tested for the presence of binding antibodies, 5 subjects previously receiving botulinum toxins were positive at baseline and 9 patients developed binding antibodies after injections. Among those 9 subjects, 3 subjects developed neutralizing antibodies, while one subject developed neutralizing antibodies from the 5 subjects testing positive for binding antibodies at baseline who previously received botulinum toxin injections. Two subjects were positive for neutralizing antibodies at baseline and 5 subjects developed neutralizing antibodies after treatments.

In total, from the 429 patients tested for the presence of neutralizing antibodies, 2.1% developed neutralizing antibodies after treatment.

Postmarketing Experience

Because adverse reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of Dysport: vertigo, photophobia, influenza-like illness, amyotrophy, muscle atrophy, burning sensation, facial paresis, hypoesthesia, erythema, dry eye, and excessive granulation tissue. Hypersensitivity reactions including anaphylaxis have been reported.

Table 7: Most Common Adverse Reactions (≥ 5%) and Greater than Placebo in the Pooled, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase of Clinical Trials in Patients with Cervical Dystonia
Adverse ReactionsDysport 500 Units (N=173)Placebo (N=182)
%%
Any Adverse Reaction6151
General disorders and administration site conditions
Injection site discomfort138
Fatigue1210
Injection site pain54
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness164
Musculoskeletal pain73
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia154
Dry Mouth137
Nervous system disorders
Headache119
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dysphonia62
Eye Disorders The following preferred terms were reported: vision blurred, diplopia, visual acuity reduced, eye pain, eyelid disorder, accommodation disorder, dry eye, eye pruritus.72
Table 8: Common Adverse Reactions by Dose in Fixed-dose Study in Patients with Cervical Dystonia
Adverse ReactionsDysport Dose
250 Units %500 Units %1000 Units %Placebo %
Any Adverse Reaction37658330
Dysphagia2129395
Dry Mouth21183910
Muscular Weakness1112560
Injection Site Discomfort5182210
Dysphonia018280
Facial Paresis50110
Eye Disorder The following preferred terms were reported: vision blurred, diplopia, visual acuity reduced, eye pain, eyelid disorder, accommodation disorder, dry eye, eye pruritus06170
Table 9: Most Common Adverse Reactions with > 1% Incidence in Pooled, Placebo-Controlled Trials for Glabellar Lines
Adverse Reactions by Body SystemDysport (N=398) % Patients who received treatment with placebo and Dysport are counted in both treatment columns.Placebo (N=496) %
Any Adverse Reaction4833
Eye Disorders Eyelid Edema Eyelid Ptosis2 20 <1
Gastrointestinal Disorders Nausea21
General Disorders and Administrative Site Conditions Injection Site Pain Injection Site Reaction3 32 < 1
Infections and Infestations Nasopharyngitis Upper Respiratory Tract Infection Sinusitis10 3 24 2 1
Investigations Blood Present in Urine2< 1
Nervous System Disorders Headache95
Table 10: Most Common Adverse Reactions Observed in at Least 2% of Patients Treated in Pooled, Double-Blind Trials of Adult Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity Reported More Frequently than with Placebo
Adverse ReactionDysportPlacebo
500 Units (N=197) %1000 Units (N=194) %(N=279) %
Infections and infestations
Influenza121
Infection121
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscular weakness241
Pain in extremity021
Back pain121
Nervous system disorders
Headache121
Convulsion221
Syncope120
Hypoesthesia02<1
Partial seizures020
General disorders and administration site conditions
Fatigue220
Asthenia21<1
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall232
Injury221
Contusion12<1
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea12<1
Constipation021
Investigation
Blood triglycerides increased210
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough121
Vascular disorders
Hypertension12<1
Psychiatric disorders
Depression231
Table 11: Adverse Reactions Observed in at Least 2% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Trial of Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than with Placebo
Adverse ReactionsDysport 1000 U (N = 127) %Dysport 1500 U (N = 128) %Placebo (N = 130) %
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders Muscular weakness Pain in extremity Arthralgia2 6 47 6 23 2 1
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications Fall963
Nervous system disorders Headache031
Infections and infestations Upper respiratory tract infection211
General disorders and administration site conditions Fatigue Influenza-like illness Edema peripheral1 2 24 0 00 0 0
Investigations Alanine aminotransferase increase201
Gastrointestinal disorders Constipation021
Psychiatric disorders Depression Insomnia2 03 20 0
Table 12: Adverse Reactions Observed in ≥ 3% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Study of Pediatric Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than Control Group
Adverse ReactionsDysport 2 Units/kg 1 (N=70) %Dysport 8 Units/kg (N=70) %Dysport 16 Units/kg (N=70) %
Infections and infestations Upper respiratory tract infection Influenza Pharyngitis 27 1 99 1 611 3 10
Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea031
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue diorders Muscular weakness146
Nervous system disorders Headache Epilepsy0 16 03 4
Table 13: Adverse Reactions Observed in ≥ 4% of Patients Treated in the Double-Blind Trial of Pediatric Patients with Lower Limb Spasticity and Reported More Frequently than with Placebo
Adverse ReactionsUnilteralBilateral
Dysport 10 units/kg (N=43) %Dysport 15 units/kg (N=50) %Dysport 20 units/kg (N=37) %Dysport 30 units/kg (N=30) %Placebo (N=79) %
Infections and Infestations
Nasopharyngitis91216105
Bronchitis00873
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough7614106
General disorders and administration site conditions
Pyrexia712875
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity02575
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion/Epilepsy74070

Warnings & Cautions for Dysport

Spread of Toxin Effect

Postmarketing safety data from DYSPORTand other approved botulinum toxins suggest that botulinum toxin effects may, in some cases, be observed beyond the site of local injection. The symptoms are consistent with the mechanism of action of botulinum toxin and may include asthenia, generalized muscle weakness, diplopia, blurred vision, ptosis, dysphagia, dysphonia, dysarthria, urinary incontinence and breathing difficulties. These symptoms have been reported hours to weeks after injection.

Swallowing and breathing difficulties can be life-threatening and there have been reports of death related to spread of toxin effects. The risk of symptoms is probably greatest in children treated for spasticity but symptoms can also occur in adults treated for spasticity and other conditions, particularly in those patients who have underlying conditions that would predispose them to these symptoms. In unapproved uses and approved indications, symptoms consistent with spread of toxin effect have been reported at doses comparable to or lower than the maximum recommended total dose.

Lack of Interchangeability between Botulinum Toxin Products The potency Units of DYSPORT are specific to the preparation and assay method utilized. They are not interchangeable with other preparations of botulinum toxin products and, therefore, units of biological activity of DYSPORT cannot be compared to or converted into units of any other botulinum toxin products assessed with any other specific assay method.

Hypersensitivity Reactions

Serious hypersensitivity reactions have been reported with DYSPORT. Hypersensitivity reactions include anaphylaxis, serum sickness, urticaria, soft tissue edema, and dyspnea. If such a serious hypersensitivity reaction occurs, discontinue further injection of DYSPORT and institute appropriate medical therapy immediately.

Dysphagia and Breathing Difficulties Treatment with DYSPORT and other botulinum toxin products can result in swallowing or breathing difficulties. Patients with pre-existing swallowing or breathing difficulties may be more susceptible to these complications. In most cases, this is a consequence of weakening of muscles in the area of injection that are involved in breathing or swallowing.

When distant effects occur, additional respiratory muscles may be involved. Deaths as a complication of severe dysphagia have been reported after treatment with botulinum toxin. Dysphagia may persist for several weeks and require use of a feeding tube to maintain adequate nutrition and hydration.

Aspiration may result from severe dysphagia and is a particular risk when treating patients in whom swallowing or respiratory function is already compromised. Treatment of cervical dystonia with botulinum toxins may weaken neck muscles that serve as accessory muscles of ventilation. This may result in a critical loss of breathing capacity in patients with respiratory disorders who may have become dependent upon these accessory muscles.

There have been post-marketing reports of serious breathing difficulties, including respiratory failure. Patients treated with botulinum toxin may require immediate medical attention should they develop problems with swallowing, speech or respiratory disorders. These reactions can occur within hours to weeks after injection with botulinum toxin.

Facial Anatomy in the Treatment of Glabellar Lines Caution should be exercised when administering DYSPORT to patients with surgical alterations to the facial anatomy, marked facial asymmetry, inflammation at the injection site(s), ptosis, excessive dermatochalasis, deep dermal scarring, thick sebaceous skin or the inability to substantially lessen glabellar lines by physically spreading them apart. Do not exceed the recommended dosage and frequency of administration of DYSPORT. In clinical trials, subjects who received a higher dose of DYSPORT had an increased incidence of eyelid ptosis.

Dry Eye with the Treatment of Glabellar Lines

Dry eye has been reported with the use of DYSPORT in the treatment of glabellar lines. Reduced tear production, reduced blinking, and corneal disorders, may occur with use of botulinum toxins, including DYSPORT. If symptoms of dry eye (e.g., eye irritation, photophobia, or visual changes) persist, consider referring patient to an opththalmologist.

Pre-existing Neuromuscular Disorders Individuals with peripheral motor neuropathic diseases, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or neuromuscular junction disorders (e.g., myasthenia gravis or Lambert-Eaton syndrome) should be monitored particularly closely when given botulinum toxin. Patients with neuromuscular disorders may be at increased risk of clinically significant effects including severe dysphagia and respiratory compromise from typical doses of DYSPORT.

Human Albumin and Transmission of Viral Diseases

This product contains albumin, a derivative of human blood. Based on effective donor screening and product manufacturing processes, it carries an extremely remote risk for transmission of viral diseases and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). There is a theoretical risk for transmission of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), but if that risk actually exists, the risk of transmission would also be considered extremely remote.

No cases of transmission of viral diseases, CJD, or vCJD have ever been identified for licensed albumin or albumin contained in other licensed products.

Intradermal Immune Reaction

The possibility of an immune reaction when injected intradermally is unknown. The safety of DYSPORT for the treatment of hyperhidrosis has not been established. DYSPORT is approved only for intramuscular injection.

Pre-existing Conditions at the Injection Site Caution should be exercised when DYSPORT is used where the targeted muscle shows excessive weakness or atrophy.

Drug Interactions with Dysport

Aminoglycosides and Other Agents Interfering with Neuromuscular Transmission Co-administration of DYSPORT and aminoglycosides or other agents interfering with neuromuscular transmission (e.g., curare-like agents) should only be performed with caution because the effect of the botulinum toxin may be potentiated. If co-administered, observe the patient closely.

Anticholinergic Drugs Use of anticholinergic drugs after administration of DYSPORT may potentiate systemic anticholinergic effects such as blurred vision.

Other Botulinum Neurotoxin Products

The effect of administering botulinum neurotoxin products including DYSPORT, at the same time or within several months of each other is unknown. Excessive weakness may be exacerbated by another administration of botulinum toxin prior to the resolution of the effects of a previously administered botulinum toxin.

Muscle Relaxants

Excessive weakness may also be exaggerated by administration of a muscle relaxant before or after administration of DYSPORT.

Pregnancy Safety for Dysport

Pregnancy Risk Summary There are no adequate and well-controlled clinical studies with DYSPORT in pregnant women. DYSPORT should only be used during pregnancy if the potential benefit justifies the potential risk to the fetus. DYSPORT produced embryo-fetal toxicity in relation to maternal toxicity when given to pregnant rats and rabbits at doses lower than or similar to the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 1000 Units on a body weight (Units/kg) basis ( see Data ).

In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2-4% and 15-20%, respectively. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown. The no-effect dose for embryo-fetal developmental toxicity was 2.2 Units/kg (less than maximum recommended human on a body weight basis).

At the lower daily doses or with intermittent dosing, no adverse developmental effects were observed. All dosed for which data were available are less than the MRHD on a body weight basis. In a study in which pregnant rats received 6 weekly intramuscular injections of DYSPORT Units/kg beginning on day 6 of gestation and continuing through parturition to weaning, an increase in stillbirths was observed at the highest dose tested, which was maternally toxic.

The no-effect dose for pre- and post-natal development toxicity was 22.2 Units/kg (similar to the MRHD).

Pediatric Use of Dysport

Females and Males of Reproductive Potential Infertility In rats, DYSPORT produced adverse effects on mating behavior and fertility.

Contraindications for Dysport

  • DYSPORT is contraindicated in patients with: Known hypersensitivity to any botulinum toxin products, cow's milk protein, or to any of the components in the formulation. This product may contain trace amounts of cow's milk protein. Infection at the proposed injection site(s).
  • Hypersensitivity to:
  • Any botulinum toxin product or excipients
  • Cow's milk protein
  • Infection at the proposed injection site(s)

Overdosage Information for Dysport

Excessive doses of DYSPORT may be expected to produce neuromuscular weakness with a variety of symptoms. Respiratory support may be required where excessive doses cause paralysis of respiratory muscles. In the event of overdose, the patient should be medically monitored for symptoms of excessive muscle weakness or muscle paralysis.

Symptomatic treatment may be necessary. Symptoms of overdose are likely not to be present immediately following injection. Should accidental injection or oral ingestion occur, the person should be medically supervised for several weeks for signs and symptoms of excessive muscle weakness or paralysis.

There is no significant information regarding overdose from clinical studies. In the event of overdose, antitoxin raised against botulinum toxin is available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in Atlanta, GA. However, the antitoxin will not reverse any botulinum toxin-induced effects already apparent by the time of antitoxin administration.

In the event of suspected or actual cases of botulinum toxin poisoning, please contact your local or state Health Department to process a request for antitoxin through the CDC. If you do not receive a response within 30 minutes, please contact the CDC directly at 770-488-7100. More information can be obtained at https://www.cdc.gov/laboratory/drugservice/index.html.

Clinical Studies of Dysport

Cervical Dystonia

The efficacy of DYSPORT was evaluated in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, parallel-group studies in treatment-naive cervical dystonia patients. Ninety-nine percent of the patients were Caucasian. In both placebo-controlled studies (Study 1 and Study 2), a dose of 500 Units of DYSPORT was given by intramuscular injection divided among two to four affected muscles.

In the extension studies, re-treatment was determined by clinical need after a minimum of 12 weeks. The median time to re-treatment was 14 weeks and 18 weeks for the 75 th percentile. The primary assessment of efficacy was based on the total Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) change from baseline at Week 4 for both studies.

The scale evaluates the severity of dystonia, patient-perceived disability from dystonia, and pain. The adjusted mean change from baseline in the TWSTRS total score was statistically significantly greater for the DYSPORT group than the placebo group at Weeks 4 in both studies (see Table 14). Table 15 indicates the average DYSPORT dose, and percentage of total dose, injected into specific muscles in the pivotal clinical trials.

Table 15: DYSPORT 500 Units starting dose (units and % of the total dose) by Unilateral Muscle Injected During Double-blind Pivotal Phase 3 studies 2 and 1 Combined Median (min, max) 75th percentile Median (min, max) 75th percentile.2 Glabellar Lines Three double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical studies evaluated the efficacy of DYSPORT for use in the temporary improvement of the appearance of moderate to severe glabellar lines. These three studies enrolled healthy adults (ages 19-75) with glabellar lines of at least moderate severity at maximum frown. Subjects were excluded if they had marked ptosis, deep dermal scarring, or a substantial inability to lessen glabellar lines, even by physically spreading them apart.

The subjects in these studies received either DYSPORT or placebo. The total dose was delivered in equally divided aliquots to specified injection sites (see Figure 1 ). Investigators and subjects assessed efficacy at maximum frown by using a 4-point scale (none, mild, moderate, severe).

Overall treatment success was defined as post-treatment glabellar line severity of none or mild with at least 2 grade improvement from Baseline for the combined investigator and subject assessments (composite assessment) on Day 30 (see Table 16). Additional endpoints for each of the studies were post-treatment glabellar line severity of none or mild with at least a 1 grade improvement from Baseline for the separate investigator and subject assessments on Day 30. After completion of the randomized studies, subjects were offered participation in a two-year, open-label re-treatment study to assess the safety of multiple treatments.

Table 16: Treatment Success at Day 30 (None or Mild with at least a 2 Grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown for the combined Investigator and Subject Assessments (Composite)) reduced the severity of glabellar lines for up to four months. Study GL-1 Study GL-1 was a single-dose, double-blind, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study in which 158 previously untreated subjects received either placebo or 50 Units of DYSPORT, administered in five aliquots of 10 Units (see Figure 1 ). Subjects were followed for 180 days.

In study GL-1, the reduction of glabellar line severity at maximum frown was greater at Day 30 in the DYSPORT group compared to the placebo group as assessed by both Investigators and subjects (Table 17). Table 17: GL-1: Investigators' and Subjects' Assessment of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild) was a repeat-dose, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized study. The study was initiated with two or three open-label treatment cycles of 50 Units of DYSPORT administered in five aliquots of 10 Units DYSPORT (see Figure 1 ).

After the open-label treatments, subjects were randomized to receive either placebo or 50 Units of DYSPORT. Subjects could have received up to four treatments through the course of the study. Efficacy was assessed in the final randomized treatment cycle.

The study enrolled 311 subjects into the first treatment cycle and 142 subjects were randomized into the final treatment cycle. Overall, the mean age was 47 years; most of the subjects were women (86%) and predominantly Caucasian (80%). The proportion of responders in the final treatment cycle was comparable to the proportion of responders in all prior treatment cycles.

After the final repeat treatment with DYSPORT, the reduction of glabellar line severity at maximum frown was greater at Day 30 in the DYSPORT group compared to the placebo group as assessed by both Investigators and subjects (see Table 18). Subjects were followed for 150 days. Table 19: GL-3 Investigators' and Subjects' Assessment of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild) Geriatric Subjects In GL1, GL2, and GL3, there were 8 subjects aged 65 and older who were randomized to DYSPORT 50 Units in 5 equal aliquots of 10 Units or placebo.

None of the geriatric DYSPORT subjects were a treatment success at maximum frown at Day 30.

Spasticity in Adults Upper Limb Spasticity

The efficacy and safety of DYSPORT for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in adults was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that included 238 patients (159 DYSPORT and 79 placebo) with upper limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≥2 in the primary targeted muscle group for toxin-naive patients or MAS score ≥3 in the primary targeted muscle group for toxin non-naive patients at least 4 months after the last botulinum toxin injection, of any serotype) who were at least 6 months post-stroke or post-traumatic brain injury. DYSPORT 500 Units (N=80), DYSPORT 1000 Units (N=79), or placebo (N=79) was injected intramuscularly into the affected upper limb muscles. After injection of the primary targeted muscle groups (PTMG), the remainder of the dose was injected into at least two additional upper limb muscles determined by the patient's individual presentation.

Table 20 provides the mean and range of DYSPORT doses injected and the number of injections into specific muscles of the upper limb. Table 21: Primary Endpoints (PTMG MAS and PGA) and MAS by for the treatment of lower limb spasticity was evaluated in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study that included 381 patients (253 DYSPORT and 128 placebo). Patients had lower limb spasticity (Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≥2 in the affected ankle joint for toxin-naive patients, or MAS score ≥3 in the affected ankle joint for toxin non-naive patients) and were at least 6 months post-stroke or post-traumatic brain injury.

Table 22 provides the median DYSPORT doses injected and the number of injections into specific muscles of the lower limb as reported in the double-blind study. In the study, the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles, and at least one additional lower limb muscle were injected, according to the clinical presentation. Table 22: DYSPORT Dose Injected and Number of Injections per Muscle in the Lower Limb - Median for the 1000 Unit and 1 The primary efficacy variable was muscle tone assessed by the MAS at the ankle joint at week 4.

The first secondary endpoint was the Physician Global Assessment at week 4 (see Table 23). Table 23: Primary Endpoint Change in MAS and the First Secondary Endpoint PGA at.4 Spasticity in Pediatric Patients Upper Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients The efficacy of DYSPORT for the treatment of upper limb spasticity in pediatric patients 2 to 17 years of age was evaluated in a double-blind, low-dose controlled, multicenter study (NCT02106351). A total of 208 patients with spasticity because of cerebral palsy who were toxin naïve or non-naïve (66% had prior treatment with botulinum toxin), weighed at least 10 kgs, and had a baseline Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) of grade 2 or greater (99% patients) at the primary targeted muscle groups (PTMG), were enrolled in the modified Intention to Treat population (mITT).

Patients received DYSPORT 16 Units/kg (n=70), DYSPORT 8 Units/kg (n=69), or DYSPORT 2 Units/kg (n=69) injected into the upper limb. The elbow flexors and wrist flexors respectively were the PTMG in 57% and in 43% of patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in MAS in the PTMG at Week 6 (see Table 24).

The secondary efficacy endpoint was the mean Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score assessed at Week 6 (Table 25). Although PGA scores numerically favored DYSPORT treatment over the low-dose control, the difference was not statistically significant. Table 24: Modified Ashworth Scale Score in the PTMG Change from Baseline at Week 6 in Pediatric Patients with Upper LImb Spasticity (mITT Population) a LS = Least Square b PTMG=Primary Targeted Muscle Group c p-value is derived from ANCOVA on ranked MAS score change from baseline with treatment, baseline score, age range at baseline, prior botulinum toxin treatment status at baseline, and center as explanatory variables d Nominal p-value <0.05 Table 25: Physician Global Assessment of Treatment Response at Week 6 in Pediatric Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity (mITT Population) a LS=Least Square b p-value is derived from ANOVA on ranked PGA score with treatment, age range at baseline, prior botulinum toxin treatment status at baseline, and center as explanatory variables Lower Limb Spasticity in Pediatric Patients The efficacy of DYSPORT for the treatment of lower limb spasticity in patients 2 to 17 years of age was evaluated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study.

A total of 235 patients with cerebral palsy causing dynamic equinus foot deformity who were toxin-naïve or non-naïve and had a Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) of grade 2 or greater at the ankle plantar flexors were enrolled. Patients received DYSPORT 10 Units/kg/leg (n=79), DYSPORT 15 Units/kg/leg (n=79) or placebo (n=77) injected into the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles (see Table 27). Forty-one percent of patients (n=66) were treated bilaterally and received a total lower limb DYSPORT dose of either 20 Units/kg (n=37) or 30 Units/kg (n=29).

The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in MAS in ankle plantar flexor at Week 4; a co-primary endpoint was the mean Physician’s Global Assessment (PGA) score at Week 4 (see Table 26). Table 26: MAS and PGA Change from Baseline at Week 4 in Pediatric Patient with Lower Limb Spasticity (ITT Population)

Table 14: TWSTRS Total Score Efficacy Outcome from the Phase 3 Cervical Dystonia Studies Intent to Treat Population
Study 1Study 2
DYSPORT 500 Units N=55Placebo N=61DYSPORT 500 Units N=37Placebo N=43
Baseline (week 0) Mean (SD)43.8 (8.0)45.8 (8.9)45.1 (8.7)46.2 (9.4)
Week 4 Mean (SD) Change from Baseline Change from baseline is expressed as adjusted least square mean (SE)30.0 (12.7) -15.6 (2.0)40.2 (11.8) -6.7 (2.)35.2 (13.8) -9.6 (2.0)42.4 (12.2) -3.7 (1.8)
treatment difference 95% confidence interval-8.9 Significant at p-value < 0.05 [-12.9 to -4.7]-5.9 [-10.6 to -1.3]
Week 8 Mean (SD) Change from Baseline29.2 (11.0) -14.7 (2.0)39.6 (13.5) -5.9 (2.0)
treatment difference 95% confidence interval-8.8 [-12.9 to -4.7]
Table 15: DYSPORT 500 Units starting dose (units and % of the total dose) by Unilateral Muscle Injected During Double-blind Pivotal Phase 3 studies 2 and 1 Combined
Number of patients injected per muscle Total number of patients in combined studies 2 and 1 who received initial treatment = 121.DYSPORT Dose InjectedPercentage of the total DYSPORT Dose Injected
Median [DYSPORT Units] (min, max)75th percentile [DYSPORT Units]Median [%] (min, max)75th percentile [%]
Sternocleidomastoid90125 Units (50, 350)150 Units26.5% (10, 70)30.0%
Splenius capitis85200 Units (75, 450)250 Units40.0% (15, 90)50.0%
Trapezius50102.6 Units (50, 300)150 Units20.6% (10, 60)30.0%
Levator scapulae35105.3 Units (50, 200)125 Units21.1% (10, 40)25.0%
Scalenus (medius and anterior)26115.5 Units (50, 300)150 Units23.1% (10,60)30.0%
Semispinalis capitis21131.6 Units (50, 250)175 Units29.4% (10, 50)35.0%
Longissimus3150 Units (100, 200)200 Units30.0% (20, 40)40.0%
Table 16: Treatment Success at Day 30 (None or Mild with at least a 2 Grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown for the combined Investigator and Subject Assessments (Composite))
2 Grade Improvement
StudyDYSPORT n/N (%)Placebo n/N (%)
GL-158/105 (55%)0/53 (0%)
GL-237/71 (52%)0/71 (0%)
GL-3120/200 (60%)0/100 (0%)
Table 17: GL-1: Investigators' and Subjects' Assessment of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild)
Investigators' AssessmentSubjects' Assessment
DayDYSPORT N=105Placebo N=53DYSPORT N=105Placebo N=53
1490% 9517% 977% 819% 5
3088% 924% 274% 789% 5
6064% 672% 160% 636% 3
9043% 456% 336% 386% 3
12023% 244% 219% 206% 3
1509% 92% 18% 84% 2
1806% 60% 07% 78% 4
Table 18: GL-2 Investigators' and Subjects' Assessments of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild)
Investigators' AssessmentSubjects' Assessment
DayDYSPORT N=71Placebo N=71DYSPORT N=71Placebo N=71
3085% 604% 379% 561% 1
Table 19: GL-3 Investigators' and Subjects' Assessment of Glabellar Line Severity at Maximum Frown Using a 4-point Scale (% and Number of Subjects with Severity of None or Mild)
Investigators' AssessmentSubjects' Assessment
DayDYSPORT N=200Placebo N=100DYSPORT N=200Placebo N=100
1483% 1665% 583% 1652% 2
3086% 1710% 082% 1632% 2
6075% 1501% 165% 1304% 4
9051% 1021% 146% 912% 2
12029% 581% 131% 613% 3
15016% 321% 116% 313% 3
Table 20: DYSPORT Dose Injected and Number of Injections per Muscle in Adults with Upper Limb Spasticity
MuscleDYSPORT Treatment GroupNumber of PatientsMean DYSPORT Units injected (Min, Max)Number of Injection Sites Median [Q1; Q3]
Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP)500 U 1000 U54 6593.5 Units (50 to 100) 195.5 Units (100 to 300)1, [1; 2] 2, [1; 2]
Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS)500 U 1000 U63 7395.4 Units (50 to 100) 196.8 Units (100 to 300)2, [1; 2] 2, [1; 2]
Flexor carpi radialis (FCR)500 U 1000 U57 5792.2 Units (25 to 100) 178.1 Units (80 to 300)1, [1; 2] 1, [1; 2]
Flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU)500 U 1000 U47 4989.9 Units (25 to 180) 171.2 Units (80 to 200)1, [1; 2] 1, [1; 2]
Brachialis*500 U 1000 U60 43148.5 Units (50 to 200) 321.4 Units (100 to 300)2, [1; 2] 2, [1; 2]
Brachioradialis*500 U 1000 U42 2888.3 Units (50 to 200) 172.1Units (50 to 200)1, [1; 2] 1, [1; 2]
Biceps Brachii (BB)500 U 1000 U28 19106.4 Units (50 to 200) 207.4 Units (100 to 400)2, [1; 2] 2, [1; 2]
Pronator Teres500 U 1000 U14 3081.8 Units (45 to 200) 157.3 Units (80 to 200)1, [1; 2] 1, [1; 2]
*Primary Targeted Muscle Group
Table 21: Primary Endpoints (PTMG MAS and PGA) and MAS by Muscle Group at Week 4 in Adults with Upper Limb Spasticity
Placebo (N=79)DYSPORT
(500 units) (N=80)(1000 units) (N=79)
LS Mean Change from Baseline in PTMG Muscle Tone on the MAS-0.3-1.2*-1.4*
LS Mean PGA of Response to Treatment0.71.4*1.8*
LS Mean Change from Baseline in Wrist Flexor Muscle Tone on the MAS-0.3 (n=54)-1.4 (n=57)-1.6 (n-58)
LS Mean Change from Baseline in Finger Flexor Muscle Tone on the MAS-0.3 (n=70)-0.9 (n=66)-1.2 (n=73)
LS Mean Change from Baseline in Elbow Flexor Muscle Tone on the MAS-0.3 (n=56)-1.0 (n=61)-1.2 (n=48)
LS= Least Square *p≤0.05
Table 22: DYSPORT Dose Injected and Number of Injections per Muscle in the Lower Limb - Median for the 1000 Unit and 1500 Unit Dose Groups
Injected MuscleDYSPORT Units InjectedNumber of Injection Sites
Gastrocnemius Lateral Medial100 Units to 150 Units1
100 Units to 150 Units1
Soleus333 Units to 500 Units3
Tibialis posterior200 Units to 300 Units2
Flexor digitorum longus133 Units to 200 Units1 to 2
Flexor hallucis longus67 Units to 200 Units1
Table 23: Primary Endpoint Change in MAS and the First Secondary Endpoint PGA at Week 4 in Adults with Lower Limb Spasticity
LS Mean Change from Baseline on the Modified Ashworth ScaleDYSPORT 1000 Units (N=125)DYSPORT 1500 Units (N=128)Placebo (N=128)
Week 4-0.6-0.8 P‹0.05-0.5
LS Mean Physician Global Assessment Score Investigator
Week 40.90.90.7
Table 24: Modified Ashworth Scale Score in the PTMG Change from Baseline at Week 6 in Pediatric Patients with Upper LImb Spasticity (mITT Population)
Control GroupTreatment Groups
DYSPORT 2 U/kg (N=69)DYSPORT 8 U/kg (N=69)DYSPORT 16 U/kg (N=70)
Baseline
Mean (SD)3.1 (0.3)3.1 (0.3)3.1 (0.5)
Week 6
LS a mean change from baseline in PTMG b on MAS-1.6-2.0-2.3
Difference from control in LS a means-0.4-0.7
p-value c0.0118 d<0.0001
Week 16
LS a mean change from baseline in PGMG b on MAS-0.9-1.2-1.5
Difference from control in LS a means-0.3 d-0.6 d
Table 25: Physician Global Assessment of Treatment Response at Week 6 in Pediatric Patients with Upper Limb Spasticity (mITT Population)
Control GroupTreatment Group
DYSPORT 2 U/kg (N=68)DYSPORT 8 U/kg (N=69)DYSPORT 16 U/kg (N=70)
Week 6
Mean score (SD)1.7 (0.9)2.0 (0.9)2.0 (0.9)
LS a mean in PGA1.82.02.0
Difference from control in LS a mean0.20.2
p-value b0.20430.1880
Week 16
Mean score (SD)1.7 (1.0)1.6 (1.1)1.9 (1.2)
LS a mean in PGA1.81.71.9
Difference from contron in LS a mean-0.10.1
p-value b0.70010.4041
Table 26: MAS and PGA Change from Baseline at Week 4 in Pediatric Patient with Lower Limb Spasticity (ITT Population)
Placebo (N=77)DYSPORT 10 Units/kg/leg (N=79)DYSPORT 15 Units/kg/leg (N=79)
LS Mean Change from Baseline in Ankle plantar flexor Muscle Tone on the MASWeek 4-0.5-0.9*-1.0*
Week 12-0.5-0.8*-1.0*
LS Mean PGA of Response to TreatmentWeek 40.71.5*1.5*
Week 120.40.8*1.0*
LS=Least Square *p‹0.05

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Dysport?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Dysport Prices