Cosela Drug Information
Generic name: TRILACICLIB
Uses of Cosela
is indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in adult patients when administered prior to a platinum/etoposide-containing regimen or topotecan-containing regimen for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). COSELA is a kinase inhibitor indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in adult patients when administered prior to a platinum/etoposide-containing regimen or topotecan-containing regimen for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.
Dosage & Administration of Cosela
| Injection-site reactions including phlebitis and thrombophlebitis | Grade 1: Tenderness with or without symptoms (e.g., warmth, erythema, itching) |
|---|---|
| Grade 2: Pain; lipodystrophy; edema; phlebitis | Interrupt infusion of COSELA. If pain not severe, follow instructions for Grade 1. Otherwise, stop infusion in extremity and rotate site of infusion to site in alternative extremity. If 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP is being used as a diluent/flush, consider changing to 5% Dextrose Injection, USP as appropriate for subsequent infusions. Central access may also be considered. |
| Grade 3: Ulceration or necrosis; severe tissue damage; operative intervention indicated. OR Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent interventions indicated. | Stop infusion and permanently discontinue COSELA. |
| Acute drug hypersensitivity reactions | Grade 2: Moderate; minimal, local, or noninvasive intervention indicated; limiting Activities of Daily Living (ADL). |
| Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL. OR Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. | Permanently discontinue COSELA. |
| Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis | Grade 2 (symptomatic) |
| Grade 3: Severe symptoms; limiting self-care ADL; oxygen indicated. OR Grade 4: Life-threatening respiratory compromise; urgent intervention indicated (e.g., tracheotomy or intubation) | Permanently discontinue COSELA. |
| Other toxicities | Grade 3: Severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care ADL. |
| Grade 4: Life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated. | Permanently discontinue COSELA. |
Side Effects of Cosela
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical trials are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared with rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in clinical practice. The safety of COSELA was evaluated in Studies 1, 2, and 3 . Patients received COSELA 240 mg/m 2 by 30-minute intravenous infusion prior to chemotherapy on each chemotherapy day. The data described in this section reflect exposure to COSELA among 240 patients (122 patients in the trilaciclib group and 118 patients in the placebo group) being treated for extensive stage-small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) in 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials: 32 patients with treatment naïve ES-SCLC received carboplatin (AUC 5 Day 1) + etoposide (100 mg/m 2 Days 1-3) every 21 days; 58 received carboplatin (AUC 5 Day 1) + etoposide (100 mg/m 2 Days 1-3) every 21 days + atezolizumab (1200 mg on Day 1) every 21 days; 32 patients with previously treated ES-SCLC received topotecan (1.5 mg/m 2 Days 1-5) every 21 days.
Study 1: COSELA Prior to Etoposide, Carboplatin, and Atezolizumab (E/P/A) Patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy Study 1 (G1T28-05; NCT03041311) was an international, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of COSELA or placebo administered prior to treatment with etoposide, carboplatin, and atezolizumab (E/P/A) for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy. The data presented below are for the 105 patients who received study treatment. Eighty-five percent of patients receiving COSELA and 91% receiving placebo completed 4 cycles of induction therapy.
Study 2: COSELA Prior to Etoposide and Carboplatin (E/P) Patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy Study 2 (G1T28-02; NCT02499770) was an international, randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of COSELA or placebo administered prior to treatment with etoposide and carboplatin (E/P) for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy. The data presented below are for the 75 patients who received study treatment. Seventy-six percent of patients in the COSELA group and 87% of patients in the placebo group completed at least 4 cycles of therapy.
The median duration of treatment was 6 cycles in each treatment group. Study 3: COSELA Prior to Topotecan Patients with ES-SCLC previously treated with chemotherapy Study 3 (G1T28-03; NCT02514447) was an international, randomized (2:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of COSELA or placebo administered prior to treatment with topotecan for patients with ES-SCLC previously treated with chemotherapy. The data presented below are for the 60 patients who received study treatment with the 1.5 mg/m 2 dose of topotecan.
Thirty-eight percent of patients receiving COSELA and 29% of patients receiving placebo completed 5 or more cycles of therapy. The median duration of treatment was 3 cycles in each treatment group. Integrated Safety Analysis The adverse reaction summary presented in Table 3 are pooled safety results from Studies 1, 2, and 3. The patients included in the pooling are those randomized patients that received at least 1 dose of COSELA (122 patients) or placebo (118 patients). Seventy-one percent of patients receiving COSELA and 78% of patients receiving placebo completed at least 4 cycles of therapy.
The median duration of treatment was the same (4 cycles) for patients receiving COSELA and placebo. Serious adverse reactions occurred in 30% of patients receiving COSELA. Serious adverse reactions reported in >3% of patients who received COSELA included respiratory failure, hemorrhage, and thrombosis. Permanent discontinuation due to an adverse reaction occurred in 9% of patients who received COSELA. Adverse reactions leading to permanent discontinuation of any study treatment for patients receiving COSELA included pneumonia (2%), asthenia (2%), injection-site reaction, thrombocytopenia, cerebrovascular accident, ischemic stroke, infusion-related reaction, respiratory failure, and myositis (<1% each). Fatal adverse reactions were observed in 5% of patients receiving COSELA. Fatal adverse reactions for patients receiving COSELA included pneumonia (2%), respiratory failure (2%), acute respiratory failure (<1%), hemoptysis (<1%), and cerebrovascular accident (<1%). Infusion interruptions due to an adverse reaction occurred in 4.1% of patients who received COSELA. The most common adverse reactions (≥10%) were fatigue, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypophosphatemia, aspartate aminotransferase increased, headache, and pneumonia.
The most frequently reported Grade ≥3 adverse reaction (≥5%) in patients receiving COSELA occurring at the same or higher incidence than in patients receiving placebo was hypophosphatemia. The most common adverse reactions reported in at least 5% of patients receiving COSELA with a ≥2% higher incidence compared to patients receiving placebo are shown in Table 3. Table 3: Adverse Reactions in ≥5% Patients with SCLC Receiving COSELA (with ≥2% Higher Incidence in COSELA Compared to Placebo) Adverse Reaction COSELA (N=122) Placebo (N=118) All Grades a (%) Grade ≥3 (%) All Grades a (%) Grade ≥3 (%) a Graded per NCI CTCAE v4.03 b Hypocalcemia=calcium decreased (lab) or treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) preferred term 'Hypocalcemia' c Hypokalemia=potassium decreased (lab) or TEAE preferred terms 'Hypokalemia,' 'Blood potassium decreased' d Hypophosphatemia=phosphate decreased (lab) or TEAE preferred terms 'Hypophosphatemia,' 'Blood phosphorus decreased' e Aspartate aminotransferase increased=aspartate aminotransferase increased (lab) or TEAE preferred term 'Blood aspartate aminotransferase increased' Fatigue 34 3 27 2 Hypocalcemia b 24 <1 21 <1 Hypokalemia c 22 6 18 3 Hypophosphatemia d 21 7 16 2 Aspartate aminotransferase increased e 17 <1 14 <1 Headache 13 0 9 0 Pneumonia 10 7 8 7 Rash 9 <1 6 0 Infusion-related reaction 8 0 2 0 Edema peripheral 7 0 4 <1 Abdominal pain upper 7 0 3 0 Thrombosis 7 3 2 2 Hyperglycemia 6 2 3 0 Grade 3/4 hematological adverse reactions occurring in patients treated with COSELA and placebo included neutropenia (32% and 69%), febrile neutropenia (3% and 9%), anemia (16% and 34%), thrombocytopenia (18% and 33%), leukopenia (4% and 17%), and lymphopenia (<1% and <1%), respectively.
Warnings & Cautions for Cosela
Injection-Site Reactions, Including Phlebitis and Thrombophlebitis
COSELA administration can cause injection-site reactions including phlebitis and thrombophlebitis. Injection-site reactions including phlebitis and thrombophlebitis occurred in 56 (21%) of 272 patients receiving COSELA in clinical trials, including Grade 2 (10%) and Grade 3 (0.4%) adverse reactions (ARs). The median time to onset from start of COSELA was 15 days (range 1 to 542) and from the preceding dose of COSELA was 1 day (1 to 15).The median duration was 1 day (range 1 to 151 for the resolved cases). Injection-site reactions including phlebitis and thrombophlebitis resolved in 49 (88%) of the 56 patients and led to discontinuation of treatment in 3 (1%) of the 272 patients. Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of injection-site reactions, phlebitis, and thrombophlebitis, including infusion-site pain and erythema during infusion.
For mild (Grade 1) to moderate (Grade 2) injection-site reactions, flush line/cannula with at least 20 mL of sterile 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection, USP or 5% Dextrose Injection, USP after end of infusion. For severe (Grade 3) or life-threatening (Grade 4) injection-site reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue COSELA .
Acute Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions
COSELA administration can cause acute drug hypersensitivity reactions, including facial edema and urticaria. Acute drug hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 16 (6%) of 272 patients receiving COSELA in clinical trials, including Grade 2 reactions (2%). One patient experienced a Grade 2 anaphylactic reaction 4 days after receiving COSELA, which resolved with epinephrine, and treatment with COSELA was continued. The median time to onset from start of COSELA was 77 days (range 2 to 256) and from the preceding dose of COSELA was 1 day (range 1 to 28). The median duration was 6 days (range 1 to 69 for the resolved cases). Acute drug hypersensitivity reactions resolved in 12 (75%) of the 16 patients.
Monitor patients for signs and symptoms of acute drug hypersensitivity reactions including facial, eye, and tongue edema, urticaria, pruritus, and anaphylactic reactions. For moderate (Grade 2) acute drug hypersensitivity reactions, stop infusion and hold COSELA until the adverse reaction recovers to Grade ≤1. For severe (Grade 3) or life-threatening (Grade 4) acute drug hypersensitivity reactions, stop infusion and permanently discontinue COSELA .
Interstitial Lung Disease/Pneumonitis Severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease (ILD) and/or
pneumonitis can occur in patients treated with cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK)4/6 inhibitors, the same drug class as COSELA. ILD/pneumonitis occurred in 1 (0.4%) of 272 patients receiving COSELA in clinical trials. The adverse reaction was Grade 3 and reported 2 months after discontinuing COSELA, in a patient receiving a confounding medication. The adverse reaction did not resolve.
Monitor patients for pulmonary symptoms indicative of ILD/pneumonitis such as cough, dyspnea, and hypoxia. For recurrent moderate (Grade 2) ILD/pneumonitis, permanently discontinue COSELA. For severe (Grade 3) or life-threatening (Grade 4) ILD/pneumonitis, permanently discontinue COSELA .
Embryo-Fetal Toxicity
Based on its mechanism of action, COSELA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman. Females of reproductive potential should use an effective method of contraception during treatment with COSELA and for at least 3 weeks after the final dose.
Drug Interactions with Cosela
Effect of
COSELA on Other Drugs, Certain OCT2, MATE1, and MATE-2K Substrates COSELA is an inhibitor of OCT2, MATE1, and MATE-2K. Co-administration of COSELA may increase the concentration or net accumulation of OCT2, MATE1, and MATE-2K substrates in the kidney (e.g., dofetilide, dalfampridine, and cisplatin). Refer to the prescribing information for these concomitant medications for assessing the benefit and risk of concomitant use of COSELA. Table 4: Potentially Significant Drug Interactions with COSELA Drugs Recommendations Comments Dofetilide The potential benefits of taking COSELA concurrently with dofetilide should be considered against the risk of QT interval prolongation. Increased dofetilide blood levels may occur in patients who are also receiving COSELA. Increased plasma concentrations of dofetilide may cause serious ventricular arrhythmias associated with QT interval prolongation, including torsade de pointes. Dalfampridine The potential benefits of taking COSELA concurrently with dalfampridine should be considered against the risk of seizures in these patients.
Increased dalfampridine blood levels may occur in patients who are also receiving COSELA. Elevated levels of dalfampridine increase the risk of seizure. Cisplatin Closely monitor for nephrotoxicity. Concurrent treatment with COSELA may increase the exposure and alter the net accumulation of cisplatin in the kidney, which may associate with dose-related nephrotoxicity.
Pregnancy Safety for Cosela
Pregnancy Risk Summary Based on the mechanism of action, COSELA can cause fetal harm when administered to a pregnant woman . There are no available human or animal data on COSELA use to evaluate for a drug-associated risk of major birth defects, miscarriage, or adverse maternal or fetal outcomes. Advise pregnant women of the potential risk to a fetus. The background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown.
All pregnancies have a background risk of birth defect, loss, or other adverse outcomes. However, the background risk of major birth defects is 2% to 4% and of miscarriage is 15% to 20% of clinically recognized pregnancies in the United States general population.
Pediatric Use of Cosela
Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.
Contraindications for Cosela
is contraindicated in patients with a history of serious hypersensitivity reactions to trilaciclib. Reactions have included anaphylaxis . Patients with a history of serious hypersensitivity reactions to COSELA.
Clinical Studies of Cosela
The efficacy of COSELA was established in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with extensive stage-small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). Study 1 (G1T28-05; NCT03041311) enrolled adult patients receiving carboplatin, etoposide, and atezolizumab for newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. Study 2 (G1T28-02; NCT02499770) enrolled adult patients receiving etoposide/carboplatin for newly diagnosed ES-SCLC. Study 3 (G1T28-03; NCT02514447) enrolled adult patients receiving topotecan for previously treated ES-SCLC. During Cycle 1, all three studies prohibited primary prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) use. Both ESAs and prophylactic G-CSF were allowed from Cycle 2 onwards as clinically indicated. Therapeutic G-CSF, RBC, and platelet transfusions were allowed at any time during the studies as clinically indicated.
Study 1: COSELA Prior to Etoposide, Carboplatin, and Atezolizumab (E/P/A) Patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy Study 1 (G1T28-05) was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled study of COSELA or placebo administered prior to treatment with etoposide, carboplatin, and atezolizumab (E/P/A) for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy. A total of 107 patients were randomized to receive COSELA (n=54) or placebo (n=53) prior to administration of E/P/A; patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (0 to 1 vs 2) and the presence of brain metastases. Carboplatin (AUC 5) and atezolizumab (1200 mg) were administered on Day 1 and etoposide (100 mg/m 2 ) and COSELA (240 mg/m 2 ) or placebo were administered on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of 4 cycles (induction). After induction, maintenance atezolizumab (1200 mg) monotherapy on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
COSELA was not administered during maintenance. The study population characteristics were: median age 64 years (range: 45 to 83); 70% male; 97% white; 14% ECOG performance status 2; 28% with a history of brain metastases; 38% current smokers; 46% lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >ULN. The mean relative dose intensities (RDIs) for E/P/A in patients receiving COSELA were 93%, 95%, and 93%, respectively. The mean RDIs for E/P/A in patients receiving placebo were 88%, 89%, and 91%, respectively.
Dose reductions of carboplatin occurred in 2% of patients receiving COSELA and in 25% of patients receiving placebo; dose reductions of etoposide occurred in 6% of patients receiving COSELA and in 26% of patients receiving placebo. No dose reduction was allowed for COSELA or atezolizumab. The study demonstrated a statistically significantly shorter duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) in Cycle 1 (0 vs 4 days) and a lower proportion of patients with severe neutropenia (SN) (2% vs 49%) in patients receiving COSELA compared with placebo ( Table 5 ). Nineteen percent of patients receiving COSELA had Grade 3 or 4 decreased hemoglobin compared with 28% of patients receiving placebo (adjusted relative risk 0.663 ). The rate of RBC transfusions over time was 1.7/100 weeks for patients receiving COSELA and 2.6/100 weeks for patients receiving placebo (adjusted relative risk was not estimable). Six percent of patients receiving COSELA received erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) compared with 11% of patients receiving placebo (adjusted relative risk 0.529 ). Table 5: Study 1: Myeloprotective Efficacy Results in Patients Treated with COSELA or Placebo Prior to Chemotherapy (Intent-to-Treat Analysis) Endpoint COSELA 240 mg/m 2 (N=54) Placebo (N=53) Treatment Effect a (Mean Difference* or Adjusted Relative Risk) (95% CI) Adjusted 1-sided p-value b ANCOVA=analysis of covariance; CI=confidence interval; DSN=duration of severe neutropenia; G-CSF=granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; N=total number of patients in each treatment group; RBC=red blood cell; SD=standard deviation a The following statistical models were used to assess treatment effects: non-parametric ANCOVA (DSN in Cycle 1); modified Poisson regression (occurrence of SN and RBC transfusion on/after 5 weeks); negative binomial regression (number of all-cause dose reductions). All models included the following as covariates: ECOG status, presence of brain metastases, and the corresponding baseline laboratory values. b One-sided adjusted p-value obtained from a Hochberg-based gatekeeping procedure.
Primary Endpoints DSN in Cycle 1 (days): mean (SD) 0 4 -3.6* (-4.9, -2.3) <0.0001 Number (%) of patients with severe neutropenia 1 (1.9%) 26 (49.1%) 0.038 <0.0001 Key Secondary Endpoints Number of all-cause dose reductions, event rate per cycle 0.021 0.085 0.242 0.0195 Number (%) of patients with RBC transfusion on/after 5 weeks 7 (13.0%) 11 (20.8%) 0.642 -- Number (%) of patients with G-CSF administration 16 (29.6%) 25 (47.2%) 0.646 -- Study 2: COSELA Prior to Etoposide and Carboplatin Patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy Study 2 (G1T28-02) was a randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of COSELA or placebo administered prior to treatment with etoposide and carboplatin (E/P) for patients with newly diagnosed ES-SCLC not previously treated with chemotherapy. A total of 77 patients were randomized to COSELA (n=39) or placebo (n=38) and stratified by ECOG performance status (0 to 1 vs 2). Carboplatin (AUC 5) was administered on Day 1 and etoposide (100 mg/m 2 ) and COSELA (240 mg/m 2 ) or placebo were administered on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Ten percent of patients receiving COSELA had Grade 3 or 4 decreased hemoglobin compared with 18% of patients receiving placebo.
The rate of RBC transfusions over time was 0.5/100 weeks for patients receiving COSELA and 1.9/100 weeks for patients receiving placebo. Three percent of patients receiving COSELA received ESAs compared with 5% of patients receiving placebo. Table 6: Study 2: Myeloprotective Efficacy Results in Patients Treated with COSELA or Placebo Prior to Chemotherapy (Intent-to-Treat Analysis) Endpoint COSELA 240 mg/m 2 (N=39) Placebo (N=38) DSN=duration of severe neutropenia; G-CSF=granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; N=total number of patients in each treatment group; RBC=red blood cell; SD=standard deviation DSN in Cycle 1 (days): mean (SD) 0 3 Number (%) of patients with severe neutropenia 2 (5.1%) 16 (42.1%) Number of all-cause dose reductions, event rate per cycle 0.022 0.084 Number (%) of patients with RBC transfusion on/after 5 weeks 2 (5.1%) 9 (23.7%) Number (%) of patients with G-CSF administration 4 (10.3%) 24 (63.2%) Study 3: COSELA Prior to Topotecan Patients with ES-SCLC previously treated with chemotherapy Study 3 (G1T28-03) included a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of COSELA or placebo administered prior to topotecan in patients with ES-SCLC previously treated with chemotherapy.
A total of 61 patients were randomized to COSELA (n=32) or placebo (n=29). Patients were stratified by ECOG performance status (0 to 1 vs 2) and sensitivity to first-line treatment. Topotecan (1.5 mg/m 2 ) and COSELA (240 mg/m 2 ) or placebo were administered on Days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle. Treatment was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Thirty-eight percent of patients receiving COSELA had Grade 3 or 4 decreased hemoglobin compared with 59% of patients receiving placebo. The rate of RBC transfusions over time was 2.6/100 weeks for patients receiving COSELA and 6.3/100 weeks for patients receiving placebo. Three percent of patients receiving COSELA received ESAs compared with 21% of patients receiving placebo.
Table 7: Study 3: Myeloprotective Efficacy Results in Patients Treated with COSELA or Placebo Prior to Chemotherapy (Intent-to-Treat Analysis) Endpoint COSELA 240 mg/m 2 (N=32) Placebo (N=29) DSN=duration of severe neutropenia; G-CSF=granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; N=total number of patients in each treatment group; RBC=red blood cell; SD=standard deviation Primary Endpoints DSN in Cycle 1 (days): mean (SD) 2 7 Number (%) of patients with severe neutropenia 13 (40.6%) 22 (75.9%) Key Secondary Endpoints Number of all-cause dose reductions, event rate per cycle 0.051 0.116 Number (%) of patients with RBC transfusion on/after 5 weeks 10 (31.3%) 12 (41.4%) Number (%) of patients with G-CSF administration 16 (50.0%) 19 (65.5%) Number (%) of patients with platelet transfusion 8 (25.0%) 9 (31.0%) Patient Subgroups Treatment efficacy was examined across different subgroups, including those quantifying the risk of febrile neutropenia, anemia, and RBC transfusions; results were consistent across subgroups.
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Cosela?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Cosela Prices