Zypitamag Drug Information
Generic name: PITAVASTATIN MAGNESIUM
HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor [EPC]
Uses of Zypitamag
is indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in adults with primary hyperlipidemia. Pediatric use information is approved for Kowa Co Ltd LIVALO (pitavastatin) tablets. However, due to Kowa Co Ltd marketing exclusivity rights, this drug product is not labeled with that information.
ZYPITAMAG is a HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) indicated as an adjunct to diet to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in adults with primary hyperlipidemia.
Dosage & Administration of Zypitamag
Important Dosage and
Administration Information Take ZYPITAMAG orally once daily with or without food at the same time each day. For patients that require a high-intensity statin or are unable to achieve their LDL-C goal receiving ZYPITAMAG 4 mg daily, prescribe alternative LDL-C-lowering treatment. Assess LDL-C when clinically appropriate, as early as 4 weeks after initiating ZYPITAMAG, and adjust the dosage if necessary.
Recommended Dosage for Adults
The recommended dosage range of ZYPITAMAG is 2 mg to 4 mg daily. The maximum recommended dosage is ZYPITAMAG 4 mg once daily.
Recommended Dosage in Patients with Renal Impairment
The recommended starting dosage for patients with moderate and severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate 30 – 59 mL/minute/1.73 m 2 and 15 – 29 mL/minute/1.73 m 2, respectively) and patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis is pitavastatin 1 mg once daily. ZYPITAMAG is not available in a 1 mg dose; use an alternative formulation of pitavastatin for the 1 mg dose. The maximum recommended dose for these patients is ZYPITAMAG 2 mg once daily . There are no dosage adjustment recommendations for patients with mild renal impairment.
Dosage Adjustments Due to Drug Interactions
In patients taking erythromycin, do not exceed pitavastatin 1 mg once daily . ZYPITAMAG is not available in a 1 mg dose; use an alternative formulation of pitavastatin for the 1 mg dose. In patients taking rifampin, do not exceed ZYPITAMAG 2 mg once daily . Pediatric use information is approved for Kowa Co Ltd’s LIVALO (pitavastatin) tablets. However, due to Kowa Co Ltd’s marketing exclusivity rights, this drug product is not labeled with that information.
Side Effects of Zypitamag
Clinical Studies Experience
Because clinical studies are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical studies of one drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical studies of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Adverse Reactions in Adults with Primary Hyperlipidemia In 10 controlled clinical studies and 4 subsequent open-label extension studies, 3,291 adult patients with primary hyperlipidemia were administered pitavastatin 1 mg to 4 mg daily. The mean continuous exposure of pitavastatin (1 mg to 4 mg) was 36.7 weeks (median 51.1 weeks). The mean age of the patients was 60.9 years (range; 18 years – 89 years) and 52% females.
Approximately 93% of the patients were White 7% were Asian/Indian, 0.2% were African American and 0.3% were Hispanic and other. In controlled clinical studies and their open-label extensions, 3.9% (1 mg), 3.3% (2 mg), and 3.7% (4 mg) of pitavastatin-treated patients were discontinued due to adverse reactions. The most common adverse reactions that led to treatment discontinuation were: elevated creatine phosphokinase (0.6% on 4 mg) and myalgia (0.5% on 4 mg). Adverse reactions reported in ≥ 2% of patients in controlled clinical studies and at a rate greater than or equal to placebo are shown in Table 1. These studies had treatment duration of up to 12 weeks.
Table 1. Adverse Reactions (≥ 2% and ≥ placebo) in Adult Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia and Mixed Dyslipidemia in Studies up to 12 Weeks Adverse Reactions Placebo N=208 % Pitavastatin 1 mg N=309 % Pitavastatin 2 mg N=951 % Pitavastatin 4 mg N=1540 % Myalgia 1.4 1.9 2.8
Constipation 1.9 3.6 1.5 2.2 Diarrhea 1.9 2.6 1.5 1.9 Back pain
2.9 3.9 1.8
Pain in extremity 1.9 2.3 0.6 0.9 Other adverse reactions reported from
clinical studies were arthralgia, headache, influenza, and nasopharyngitis. Hypersensitivity reactions including rash, pruritus, and urticaria have been reported with pitavastatin. The following laboratory abnormalities have been reported: elevated creatine phosphokinase, transaminases, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and glucose.
Adverse Reactions in Adult HIV-Infected Patients with Dyslipidemia In a double-blind, randomized, controlled, 52-week trial, 252 HIV-infected patients with dyslipidemia were treated with either pitavastatin 4 mg once daily (n=126) or another statin (n=126). All patients were taking antiretroviral therapy (excluding darunavir) and had HIV-1 RNA less than 200 copies/mL and CD4 count greater than 200 cell/μL for at least 3 months prior to randomization. The safety profile of pitavastatin was generally consistent with that observed in the clinical trials described above. One patient (0.8%) treated with pitavastatin had a peak creatine phosphokinase value exceeding 10 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), which resolved spontaneously.
Four patients (3%) treated with pitavastatin had at least one ALT value exceeding 3 times but less than 5 times the ULN, none of which led to drug discontinuation. Virologic failure was reported for four patients (3%) treated with pitavastatin, defined as a confirmed measurement of HIV-1 RNA exceeding 200 copies/mL that was also more than a 2-fold increase from baseline. Pediatric use information is approved for Kowa Co Ltd’s LIVALO (pitavastatin) tablets.
However, due to Kowa Co Ltd’s marketing exclusivity rights, this drug product is not labeled with that information.
Postmarketing Experience
The following adverse reactions have been identified during post-approval use of pitavastatin. Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Gastrointestinal disorders: abdominal discomfort, abdominal pain, dyspepsia, nausea General disorders: asthenia, fatigue, malaise, dizziness Hepatobiliary disorders: hepatitis, jaundice, fatal and non-fatal hepatic failure Immune system disorders: angioedema, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy associated with statin use Metabolism and nutrition disorders: increases in HbA1c, fasting serum glucose levels Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders: muscle spasms, myopathy, rhabdomyolysis Nervous system disorders: hypoesthesia, peripheral neuropathy, rare reports of cognitive impairment (e.g., memory loss, forgetfulness, amnesia, memory impairment, confusion) associated with statin use.
Cognitive impairment was generally nonserious, and reversible upon statin discontinuation, with variable times to symptom onset (1 day to years) and symptom resolution (median of 3 weeks). There have been rare reports of new-onset or exacerbation of myasthenia gravis, including ocular myasthenia, and reports of recurrence when the same or a different statin was administered. Psychiatric disorders: insomnia, depression. Reproductive system and breast disorders: erectile dysfunction Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders: interstitial lung disease Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders: lichen planus
Warnings & Cautions for Zypitamag
Myopathy and Rhabdomyolysis
ZYPITAMAG may cause myopathy (muscle pain, tenderness, or weakness associated with elevated creatine kinase ) and rhabdomyolysis. Acute kidney injury secondary to myoglobinuria and rare fatalities have occurred as a result of rhabdomyolysis in patients treated with statins, including pitavastatin. Risk Factors for Myopathy Risk factors for myopathy include age 65 years or greater, uncontrolled hypothyroidism, renal impairment, concomitant use of certain drugs (including other lipid-lowering therapies), and higher ZYPITAMAG dosage . Dosages of pitavastatin greater than 4 mg once daily were associated with an increased risk for severe myopathy in premarketing clinical studies.
The maximum recommended dose of ZYPITAMAG is 4 mg once daily. Steps to Prevent or Reduce the Risk of Myopathy and Rhabdomyolysis ZYPITAMAG is contraindicated in patients taking cyclosporine and not recommended in patients taking gemfibrozil . There are pitavastatin dosage restrictions for patients taking erythromycin or rifampin . The following drugs when used concomitantly with ZYPITAMAG may also increase the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis: lipid-modifying dosages of niacin (>1 grams/day), fibrates, and colchicine . Discontinue ZYPITAMAG if markedly elevated CK levels occur or if myopathy is either diagnosed or suspected. Muscle symptoms and CK elevations may resolve if ZYPITAMAG is discontinued.
Temporarily discontinue ZYPITAMAG in patients experiencing an acute or serious condition at high risk of developing renal failure secondary to rhabdomyolysis (e.g., sepsis; shock; severe hypovolemia; major surgery; trauma; severe metabolic, endocrine, or electrolyte disorders; or uncontrolled epilepsy). Inform patients of the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis when starting or increasing the ZYPITAMAG dosage. Instruct patients to promptly report any unexplained muscle pain, tenderness or weakness, particularly if accompanied by malaise or fever.
Immune-Mediated Necrotizing Myopathy
There have been rare reports of immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM), an autoimmune myopathy, associated with statin use, including reports of recurrence when the same or a different statin was administered. IMNM is characterized by proximal muscle weakness and elevated serum creatine kinase that persist despite discontinuation of statin treatment; positive anti-HMG CoA reductase antibody; muscle biopsy showing necrotizing myopathy; and improvement with immunosuppressive agents. Additional neuromuscular and serologic testing may be necessary.
Treatment with immunosuppressive agents may be required. Discontinue ZYPITAMAG if IMNM is suspected.
Hepatic Dysfunction Increases in serum transaminases have been reported with
ZYPITAMAG . In most cases, these changes appeared soon after initiation, were transient, were not accompanied by symptoms, and resolved or improved on continued therapy or after a brief interruption in therapy. There have been rare postmarketing reports of fatal and non-fatal hepatic failure in patients taking statins, including pitavastatin. Patients who consume substantial quantities of alcohol and/or have a history of liver disease may be at increased risk for hepatic injury.
Consider liver enzyme testing before the initiation of ZYPITAMAG and when clinically indicated thereafter. ZYPITAMAG is contraindicated in patients with acute liver failure or decompensated cirrhosis . If serious hepatic injury with clinical symptoms and/or hyperbilirubinemia or jaundice occurs, promptly discontinue ZYPITAMAG.
Increases in HbA1c and Fasting Serum Glucose Levels Increases in HbA1c and
fasting serum glucose levels have been reported with statins, including pitavastatin. Optimize lifestyle measures, including regular exercise, maintaining a healthy body weight, and making healthy food choices.
Drug Interactions with Zypitamag
See full prescribing information for details regarding concomitant use of ZYPITAMAG with other drugs that increase the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis.. Table 2 includes a list of drugs that increase the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis when administered concomitantly with ZYPITAMAG and instructions for preventing or managing drug interactions . Table 2. Drug Interactions that Increase the Risk of Myopathy and Rhabdomyolysis with ZYPITAMAG Cyclosporine Clinical Impact: Cyclosporine significantly increases pitavastatin exposure and increases the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Intervention: Concomitant use of cyclosporine with ZYPITAMAG is contraindicated. Gemfibrozil Clinical Impact: Gemfibrozil may cause myopathy when given alone.
The risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis is increased with concomitant use of gemfibrozil with statins, including pitavastatin. Intervention: Avoid concomitant use of gemfibrozil with ZYPITAMAG. Erythromycin Clinical Impact: Erythromycin significantly increases pitavastatin exposure and increases the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Intervention: In patients taking erythromycin, do not exceed ZYPITAMAG 1 mg once daily.
Rifampin Clinical Impact: Rifampin significantly increases peak pitavastatin exposure and increases the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Intervention: In patients taking rifampin, do not exceed ZYPITAMAG 2 mg once daily. Fibrates Clinical Impact: Fibrates may cause myopathy when given alone.
The risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis is increased with concomitant use of fibrates with statins, including pitavastatin. Intervention: Consider if the benefit of using fibrates concomitantly with ZYPITAMAG outweighs the increased risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Niacin Clinical Impact: The risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis may be increased with concomitant use of lipid-modifying doses (1 g/day) of niacin with pitavastatin.
Intervention: Consider if the benefit of using lipid-modifying doses (>1 g/day) of niacin concomitantly with ZYPITAMAG outweighs the increased risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis. Colchicine Clinical Impact: Cases of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis have been reported with concomitant use of colchicine with statins, including pitavastatin. Intervention: Consider the risk/benefit of concomitant use of colchicine with ZYPITAMAG.
Pregnancy Safety for Zypitamag
Pregnancy Risk Summary Discontinue ZYPITAMAG when pregnancy is recognized. Alternatively, consider the ongoing therapeutic needs of the individual patient. ZYPITAMAG decreases synthesis of cholesterol and possibly other biologically active substances derived from cholesterol; therefore, ZYPITAMAG may cause fetal harm when administered to pregnant patients based on the mechanism of action . In addition, treatment of hyperlipidemia is not generally necessary during pregnancy.
Atherosclerosis is a chronic process and the discontinuation of lipid-lowering drugs during pregnancy should have little impact on the outcome of long-term therapy of primary hyperlipidemia for most patients. Available data from case series and prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies over decades of use with statins in pregnant women have not identified a drug-associated risk of major congenital malformations. Published data from prospective and retrospective observational cohort studies with statin use in pregnant women are insufficient to determine if there is a drug-associated risk of miscarriage (see Data). In animal reproduction studies, no embryo-fetal toxicity or congenital malformations were observed in pregnant rats or rabbits orally administered pitavastatin during the period of organogenesis at doses that resulted in 22 and 4 times, respectively, the human exposure at the maximum recommended human dose (MRHD) of 4 mg, based on AUC (see Data). The estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage for the indicated population is unknown.
In the U.S. general population, the estimated background risk of major birth defects and miscarriage in clinically recognized pregnancies is 2% to 4% and 15% to 20%, respectively. Data Human Data A Medicaid cohort linkage study of 1152 statin-exposed pregnant women compared to 886,996 controls did not find a significant teratogenic effect from maternal use of statins in the first trimester of pregnancy, after adjusting for potential confounders – including maternal age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity, and alcohol and tobacco use -using propensity score-based methods. The relative risk of congenital malformations between the group with statin use and the group with no statin use in the first trimester was 1.07 (95% confidence interval 0.85 to 1.37) after controlling for confounders, particularly pre-existing diabetes mellitus.
There were also no statistically significant increases in any of the organ-specific malformations assessed after accounting for confounders. In the majority of pregnancies, statin treatment was initiated prior to pregnancy and was discontinued at some point in the first trimester when pregnancy was identified. Study limitations include reliance on physician coding to define the presence of a malformation, lack of control for certain confounders such as body mass index, use of prescription dispensing as verification for use of a statin, and a lack of information on non-live births.
Animal Data Embryo-fetal developmental studies were conducted in pregnant rats administered 3 mg/kg/day, 10 mg/kg/day, 30 mg/kg/day pitavastatin by oral gavage during organogenesis (gestation day 7-17). No adverse effects were observed at 3 mg/kg/day, systemic exposures 22 times human systemic exposure at 4 mg/day based on AUC. Embryo-fetal developmental studies were conducted in pregnant rabbits administered 0.1 mg/kg/day, 0.3 mg/kg/day, 1 mg/kg/day pitavastatin by oral gavage during the period of fetal organogenesis (gestation day 6-18). Maternal toxicity consisting of reduced body weight and abortion was observed at all doses tested (4 times human systemic exposure at 4 mg/day based on AUC). In perinatal/postnatal studies in pregnant rats given oral gavage doses of pitavastatin at 0.1 mg/kg/day, 0.3 mg/kg/day, 1 mg/kg/day, 3 mg/kg/day, 10 mg/kg/day, 30 mg/kg/day from organogenesis through weaning (gestation day 17 to lactation day 21), maternal toxicity consisting of mortality at ≥ 0.3 mg/kg/day and impaired lactation at all doses contributed to the decreased survival of neonates in all dose groups (0.1 mg/kg/day represents approximately 1 time human systemic exposure at 4 mg/day dose based on AUC). Reproductive toxicity studies have shown that pitavastatin crosses the placenta in rats and is found in fetal tissues at ≤ 36% of maternal plasma concentrations following a single dose of 1 mg/kg/day during gestation (at the end of organogenesis).
Pediatric Use of Zypitamag
Pediatric Use The safety and effectiveness of ZYPITAMAG in pediatric patients have not been established. Pediatric use information is approved for Kowa Co Ltd LIVALO (pitavastatin) tablets. However, due to Kowa Co Ltd marketing exclusivity rights, this drug product is not labeled with that information.
Contraindications for Zypitamag
is contraindicated in the following conditions: Concomitant use of cyclosporine . Acute liver failure or decompensated cirrhosis Hypersensitivity to pitavastatin or any excipients in ZYPITAMAG. Hypersensitivity reactions including angioedema, rash, pruritus, and urticaria have been reported with pitavastatin . Cyclosporine Active liver failure or decompensated cirrhosis Hypersensitivity to pitavastatin or any excipients in ZYPITAMAG
Overdosage Information for Zypitamag
No specific treatment for pitavastatin overdose is known. Contact Poison Control (1-800-222-1222) for latest recommendations. Hemodialysis is unlikely to be of benefit due to high protein binding ratio of pitavastatin.
Clinical Studies of Zypitamag
Primary Hyperlipidemia in Adults Study with Atorvastatin (Study 301) Pitavastatin was compared with atorvastatin calcium tablets (referred to as atorvastatin) in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority study of 817 adult patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia. Patients entered a 6- to 8-week wash-out/dietary lead-in period and then were randomized to a 12-week treatment with either pitavastatin or atorvastatin (Table 5). Non-inferiority of pitavastatin to a given dose of atorvastatin was considered to be demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was greater than -6% for the mean percent change in LDL-C. Lipid results are shown in Table 5. For the percent change from baseline to endpoint in LDL-C, pitavastatin was non-inferior to atorvastatin for the two pairwise comparisons: pitavastatin 2 mg vs. atorvastatin 10 mg and pitavastatin 4 mg vs. atorvastatin 20 mg. Mean treatment differences (95% CI) were 0% (-3%, 3%) and 1% (-2%, 4%), respectively.
Table 5 Lipid Response by Dose of Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin in Adult Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia in Study 301 (Mean % Change from Baseline at Week 12) Treatment N LDL-C Apo-B TC TG HDL-C non-HDL-C Pitavastatin 2 mg daily 315 -38 -30 -28 -14 4 -35 Pitavastatin 4 mg daily 298 -45 -35 -32 -19 5 -41 Atorvastatin 10 mg daily 102 -38 -29 -28 -18 3 -35 Atorvastatin 20 mg daily 102 -44 -36 -33 -22 2 -41 Study with Simvastatin (Study 302) Pitavastatin was compared with simvastatin tablets (referred to as simvastatin) in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority study of 843 adult patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia. Patients entered a 6- to 8-week wash-out/dietary lead-in period and then were randomized to a 12-week treatment with either pitavastatin or simvastatin (Table 6). Non-inferiority of pitavastatin to a given dose of simvastatin was considered to be demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was greater than -6% for the mean percent change in LDL-C. Lipid results are shown in Table 6. For the percent change from baseline to endpoint in LDL-C, pitavastatin was non-inferior to simvastatin for the two pairwise comparisons: pitavastatin 2 mg vs. simvastatin 20 mg and pitavastatin 4 mg vs. simvastatin 40 mg. Mean treatment differences (95% CI) were 4% (1%, 7%) and 1% (-2%, 4%), respectively.
Table 6 Lipid Response by Dose of Pitavastatin and Simvastatin in Adult Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia in Study 302 (Mean % Change from Baseline at Week 12) Treatment N LDL-C Apo-B TC TG HDL-C non-HDL-C Pitavastatin 2 mg daily 307 -39 -30 -28 -16 6 -36 Pitavastatin 4 mg daily 319 -44 -35 -32 -17 6 -41 Simvastatin 20 mg daily 107 -35 -27 -25 -16 6 -32 Simvastatin 40 mg daily 110 -43 -34 -31 -16 7 -39 Study with Pravastatin in Geriatric Patients (Study 306) Pitavastatin was compared with pravastatin sodium tablets (referred to as pravastatin) in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, active-controlled non-inferiority study of 942 geriatric patients (≥ 65 years) with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia. Patients entered a 6- to 8-week wash-out/dietary lead-in period, and then were randomized to a once daily dose of pitavastatin or pravastatin for 12 weeks (Table 7). Non-inferiority of pitavastatin to a given dose of pravastatin was assumed if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference was greater than -6% for the mean percent change in LDL-C. Lipid results are shown in Table 7. Pitavastatin significantly reduced LDL-C compared to pravastatin as demonstrated by the following pairwise dose comparisons: pitavastatin 1 mg vs. pravastatin 10 mg, pitavastatin 2 mg vs. pravastatin 20 mg and pitavastatin 4 mg vs. pravastatin 40 mg. Mean treatment differences (95% CI) were 9% (6%, 12%), 10% (7%, 13%) and 10% (7%, 13%), respectively.
Table 7 Lipid Response by Dose of Pitavastatin and Pravastatin in Geriatric Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia in Study 306 (Mean % Change from Baseline at Week 12) Treatment N LDL-C Apo-B TC TG HDL-C non-HDL-C Pitavastatin 1 mg daily 207 -31 -25 -22 -13 1 -29 Pitavastatin 2 mg daily 224 -39 -31 -27 -15 2 -36 Pitavastatin 4 mg daily 210 -44 -37 -31 -22 4 -41 Pravastatin 10 mg daily 103 -22 -17 -15 -5 0 -20 Pravastatin 20 mg daily 96 -29 -22 -21 -11 -1 -27 Pravastatin 40 mg daily 102 -34 -28 -24 -15 1 -32 Study with Simvastatin in Patients with ≥ 2 Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease (Study 304) Pitavastatin was compared with simvastatin tablets (referred to as simvastatin) in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, non-inferiority study of 351 adult patients with primary hyperlipidemia or mixed dyslipidemia with ≥ 2 risk factors for coronary heart disease. After a 6- to 8-week wash-out/dietary lead-in period, patients were randomized to a 12-week treatment with either pitavastatin or simvastatin (Table 8). Non-inferiority of pitavastatin to simvastatin was considered to be demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was greater than -6% for the mean percent change in LDL-C. Lipid results are shown in Table 8. Pitavastatin 4 mg was non-inferior to simvastatin 40 mg for percent change from baseline to endpoint in LDL-C. The mean treatment difference (95% CI) was 0% (-2%, 3%). Table 8 Lipid Response by Dose of Pitavastatin and Simvastatin in Adult Patients with Primary Hyperlipidemia or Mixed Dyslipidemia with ≥ 2 Risk Factors for Coronary Heart Disease in Study 304 (Mean % Change from Baseline at Week 12) Treatment N LDL-C Apo-B TC TG HDL-C non-HDL-C Pitavastatin 4 mg daily 233 -44 -34 -31 -20 7 -40 Simvastatin 40 mg daily 118 -44 -34 -31 -15 5 -39 Study with Atorvastatin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (Study 305) Pitavastatin was compared with atorvastatin calcium tablets (referred to as atorvastatin) in a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group, active-controlled, non-inferiority study of 410 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mixed dyslipidemia. Patients entered a 6 to 8 week wash-out/dietary lead-in period and were randomized to a once daily dose of pitavastatin or atorvastatin for 12 weeks.
Non-inferiority of pitavastatin was considered to be demonstrated if the lower bound of the 95% CI for the mean treatment difference was greater than -6% for the mean percent change in LDL-C. Lipid results are shown in Table 9. The treatment difference (95% CI) for LDL-C percent change from baseline was -2% (-6.2%, 1.5%). The two treatment groups were not statistically different on LDL-C. However, the lower limit of the CI was -6.2%, slightly exceeding the -6% non-inferiority limit The study failed to demonstrate that pitavastatin was not significantly different than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mixed dyslipidemia. Table 9 Lipid Response by Dose of Pitavastatin and Atorvastatin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Mixed Dyslipidemia in Study 305 (Mean % Change from Baseline at Week 12) Treatment N LDL-C Apo-B TC TG HDL-C non-HDL-C Pitavastatin 4 mg daily 274 -41 -32 -28 -20 7 -36 Atorvastatin 20 mg daily 136 -43 -34 -32 -27 8 -40 The treatment differences in efficacy in LDL-C change from baseline between pitavastatin and active controls (i.e., atorvastatin, simvastatin, or pravastatin) in the in the active-controlled studies described above are summarized in Figure 1. Figure 1 Treatment Difference in Adjusted Mean Percent Change in LDL-C between Pitavastatin and the Comparator (Atorvastatin, Simvastatin, or Pravastatin) NL=non-inferiority limit. Pediatric use information is approved for Kowa Co Ltd’s LIVALO (pitavastatin) tablets.
However, due to Kowa Co Ltd’s marketing exclusivity rights, this drug product is not labeled with that information. Image
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Zypitamag?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Zypitamag Prices