Evista Drug Information

Generic name: RALOXIFENE HYDROCHLORIDE

Save on Evista at your pharmacy Compare prices near you and start saving today—no enrollment required.
See Prices

Uses of Evista

Treatment and Prevention of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women EVISTA is indicated for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women.

Reduction in the Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis EVISTA is indicated for the reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis.

Dosage & Administration of Evista

Recommended Dosing

The recommended dosage is one 60 mg EVISTA (raloxifene hydrochloride tablets) tablet daily, which may be administered any time of day without regard to meals. For the indications in risk of invasive breast cancer the optimum duration of treatment is not known.

Recommendations for Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation

For either osteoporosis treatment or prevention, supplemental calcium and/or vitamin D should be added to the diet if daily intake is inadequate. Postmenopausal women require an average of 1500 mg/day of elemental calcium. Total daily intake of calcium above 1500 mg has not demonstrated additional bone benefits while daily intake above 2000 mg has been associated with increased risk of adverse effects, including hypercalcemia and kidney stones.

The recommended intake of vitamin D is 400-800 IU daily. Patients at increased risk for vitamin D insufficiency (e.g., over the age of 70 years, nursing home bound, or chronically ill) may need additional vitamin D supplements. Patients with gastrointestinal malabsorption syndromes may require higher doses of vitamin D supplementation and measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D should be considered.

Side Effects of Evista

Clinical Trials Experience

Because clinical studies are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Osteoporosis Treatment Clinical Trial (MORE) — The safety of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis was assessed in a large (7705 patients) multinational, placebo-controlled trial. Therapy was discontinued due to an adverse reaction in 10.9% of EVISTA-treated women and 8.8% of placebo-treated women.

Venous Thromboembolism: The most serious adverse reaction related to EVISTA was VTE (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and retinal vein thrombosis). During an average of study-drug exposure of 2.6 years, VTE occurred in about 1 out of 100 patients treated with EVISTA. Common adverse reactions considered to be related to EVISTA therapy were hot flashes and leg cramps.

Hot flashes occurred in about one in 10 patients on EVISTA and were most commonly reported during the first 6 months of treatment and were not different from placebo thereafter. Leg cramps occurred in about one in 14 patients on EVISTA. Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Prevention Clinical Trials — The safety of raloxifene has been assessed primarily in 12 Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies with placebo, estrogen, and estrogen-progestin therapy control groups.

Discontinuation rates due to hot flashes did not differ significantly between EVISTA and placebo groups (1.7% and 2.2%, respectively). Hot flashes occurred in about one in four patients on EVISTA versus about one in six on placebo. The first occurrence of hot flashes was most commonly reported during the first 6 months of treatment.

Table 1 lists adverse reactions occurring in either the osteoporosis treatment or in five prevention placebo-controlled clinical trials at a frequency ≥2.0% in either group and in more EVISTA-treated women than in placebo-treated women. Adverse reactions are shown without attribution of causality. The majority of adverse reactions occurring during the studies were mild and generally did not require discontinuation of therapy.

Table 1: Adverse Reactions Occurring in Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Clinical Trials at a Frequency ≥2.0% and in More EVISTA-Treated (60 mg Once Daily) Women than Placebo-Treated Women a A A Comparison of EVISTA and Hormone Therapy — EVISTA was compared with estrogen-progestin therapy in three clinical trials for prevention of osteoporosis. Table 2 shows adverse reactions occurring more frequently in one treatment group and at an incidence ≥2.0% in any group. Table 2: Adverse Reactions Reported in the Clinical Trials for Osteoporosis Prevention with EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) and Continuous Combined or Cyclic Estrogen Plus Progestin (Hormone Therapy) at an Incidence ≥ — Across all placebo-controlled trials, EVISTA was indistinguishable from placebo with regard to frequency and severity of breast pain and tenderness.

EVISTA was associated with less breast pain and tenderness than reported by women receiving estrogens with or without added progestin. Gynecologic Cancers — EVISTA-treated and placebo-treated groups had similar incidences of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer. Placebo-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Major Coronary Events (RUTH) — The safety of EVISTA (60 mg once daily) was assessed in a placebo-controlled multinational trial of 10,101 postmenopausal women (age range 55-92) with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or multiple CHD risk factors.

Median study drug exposure was 5.1 years for both treatment groups. The incidence per year of all-cause mortality was similar between the raloxifene (2.07%) and placebo (2.25%) groups. Tamoxifen-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer (STAR) — The safety of EVISTA 60 mg/day versus tamoxifen 20 mg/day over 5 years was assessed in 19,747 postmenopausal women (age range 35-83 years) in a randomized, double-blind trial.

As of 31 December 2005, the median follow-up was 4.3 years. The safety profile of raloxifene was similar to that in the placebo-controlled raloxifene trials.

Postmarketing Experience

Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Adverse reactions reported very rarely since market introduction include retinal vein occlusion, stroke, and death associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Table 1: Adverse Reactions Occurring in Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Clinical Trials at a Frequency ≥2.0% and in More EVISTA-Treated (60 mg Once Daily) Women than Placebo-Treated Women a
a A: Placebo incidence greater than or equal to EVISTA incidence; B: Less than 2% incidence and more frequent with EVISTA.
b Includes only patients with an intact uterus: Prevention Trials: EVISTA, n=354, Placebo, n=364; Treatment Trial: EVISTA, n=1948, Placebo, n=1999.
c Actual terms most frequently referred to endometrial fluid.
TreatmentPrevention
EVISTA (N=2557) %Placebo (N=2576) %EVISTA (N=581) %Placebo (N=584) %
Body as a Whole
InfectionAA15.114.6
Flu Syndrome13.511.414.613.5
Headache9.28.5AA
Leg Cramps7.03.75.91.9
Chest PainAA4.03.6
Fever3.93.83.12.6
Cardiovascular System
Hot Flashes9.76.424.618.3
MigraineAA2.42.1
Syncope2.32.1BB
Varicose Vein2.21.5AA
Digestive System
Nausea8.37.88.88.6
Diarrhea7.26.9AA
DyspepsiaAA5.95.8
Vomiting4.84.33.43.3
FlatulenceAA3.12.4
Gastrointestinal DisorderAA3.32.1
GastroenteritisBB2.62.1
Metabolic and Nutritional
Weight GainAA8.86.8
Peripheral Edema5.24.43.31.9
Musculoskeletal System
Arthralgia15.514.010.710.1
MyalgiaAA7.76.2
ArthritisAA4.03.6
Tendon Disorder3.63.1AA
Nervous System
DepressionAA6.46.0
InsomniaAA5.54.3
Vertigo4.13.7AA
Neuralgia2.41.9BB
Hypesthesia2.12.0BB
Respiratory System
Sinusitis7.97.510.36.5
Rhinitis10.210.1AA
Bronchitis9.58.6AA
Pharyngitis5.35.17.67.2
Cough Increased9.39.26.05.7
PneumoniaAA2.61.5
LaryngitisBB2.21.4
Skin and Appendages
RashAA5.53.8
Sweating2.52.03.11.7
Special Senses
Conjunctivitis2.21.7AA
Urogenital System
VaginitisAA4.33.6
Urinary Tract InfectionAA4.03.9
Cystitis4.64.53.33.1
LeukorrheaAA3.31.7
Uterine Disorder b, c3.32.3AA
Endometrial Disorder bBB3.11.9
Vaginal Hemorrhage2.52.4AA
Urinary Tract Disorder2.52.1AA
Table 2: Adverse Reactions Reported in the Clinical Trials for Osteoporosis Prevention with EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) and Continuous Combined or Cyclic Estrogen Plus Progestin (Hormone Therapy) at an Incidence ≥2.0% in any Treatment Group a
a These data are from both blinded and open-label studies.
b Continuous Combined Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate.
c Cyclic Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens for 28 days with concomitant 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate or 0.15 mg norgestrel on Days 1 through 14 or 17 through 28.
d Includes only patients with an intact uterus: EVISTA, n=290; Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined, n=67; Hormone Therapy-Cyclic, n=217.
EVISTA (N=317) %Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined b (N=96) %Hormone Therapy-Cyclic c (N=219) %
Urogenital
Breast Pain4.437.529.7
Vaginal Bleeding d6.264.288.5
Digestive
Flatulence1.612.56.4
Cardiovascular
Hot Flashes28.73.15.9
Body as a Whole
Infection11.006.8
Abdominal Pain6.610.418.7
Chest Pain2.800.5

Warnings & Cautions for Evista

Venous Thromboembolism

In clinical trials, EVISTA-treated women had an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). Other venous thromboembolic events also could occur. A less serious event, superficial thrombophlebitis, also has been reported more frequently with EVISTA than with placebo.

The greatest risk for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurs during the first 4 months of treatment, and the magnitude of risk appears to be similar to the reported risk associated with use of hormone therapy. Because immobilization increases the risk for venous thromboembolic events independent of therapy, EVISTA should be discontinued at least 72 hours prior to and during prolonged immobilization (e.g., post-surgical recovery, prolonged bed rest), and EVISTA therapy should be resumed only after the patient is fully ambulatory. In addition, women taking EVISTA should be advised to move about periodically during prolonged travel.

The risk-benefit balance should be considered in women at risk of thromboembolic disease for other reasons, such as congestive heart failure, superficial thrombophlebitis, and active malignancy.

Death Due to Stroke In a clinical trial of postmenopausal women with documented coronary heart disease or at increased risk for coronary events, an increased risk of death due to stroke was observed after treatment with EVISTA. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups in the incidence of stroke (249 in EVISTA versus 224 placebo ). EVISTA had no significant effect on all-cause mortality.

The risk-benefit balance should be considered in women at risk for stroke, such as prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or cigarette smoking.

Cardiovascular Disease EVISTA should not be used for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In a clinical trial of postmenopausal women with documented coronary heart disease or at increased risk for coronary events, no cardiovascular benefit was demonstrated after treatment with raloxifene for 5 years.

Premenopausal Use There is no indication for premenopausal use of EVISTA. Safety of EVISTA in premenopausal women has not been established and its use is not recommended. Additionally, there is concern regarding inadvertent drug exposure in pregnancy in women of reproductive potential who become pregnant, due to risk of fetal harm.

Hepatic Impairment EVISTA should be used with caution in patients with hepatic impairment. Safety and efficacy have not been established in patients with hepatic impairment.

Concomitant Estrogen Therapy

The safety of concomitant use of EVISTA with systemic estrogens has not been established and its use is not recommended.

History of Hypertriglyceridemia when Treated with Estrogens

Limited clinical data suggest that some women with a history of marked hypertriglyceridemia (>5.6 mmol/L or >500 mg/dL) in response to treatment with oral estrogen or estrogen plus progestin may develop increased levels of triglycerides when treated with EVISTA. Women with this medical history should have serum triglycerides monitored when taking EVISTA.

History of Breast Cancer EVISTA has not been adequately studied in women with a prior history of breast cancer.

Use in Men There is no indication for the use of EVISTA in men. EVISTA has not been adequately studied in men and its use is not recommended.

Unexplained Uterine Bleeding

Any unexplained uterine bleeding should be investigated as clinically indicated. EVISTA-treated and placebo-treated groups had similar incidences of endometrial proliferation.

Breast Abnormalities

Any unexplained breast abnormality occurring during EVISTA therapy should be investigated. EVISTA does not eliminate the risk of breast cancer.

Drug Interactions with Evista

Cholestyramine

Concomitant administration of cholestyramine with EVISTA is not recommended. Although not specifically studied, it is anticipated that other anion exchange resins would have a similar effect. EVISTA should not be co-administered with other anion exchange resins.

Warfarin If EVISTA is given concomitantly with warfarin or other warfarin derivatives, prothrombin time should be monitored more closely when starting or stopping therapy with EVISTA.

Other Highly Protein-Bound Drugs EVISTA should be used with caution with certain other highly protein-bound drugs such as diazepam, diazoxide, and lidocaine. Although not examined, EVISTA might affect the protein binding of other drugs. Raloxifene is more than 95% bound to plasma proteins.

Systemic Estrogens

The safety of concomitant use of EVISTA with systemic estrogens has not been established and its use is not recommended.

Other Concomitant Medications EVISTA can be concomitantly administered with ampicillin, amoxicillin, antacids, corticosteroids, and digoxin. The concomitant use of EVISTA and lipid-lowering agents has not been studied.

Pregnancy Safety for Evista

Pregnancy Risk Summary EVISTA is contraindicated for use in pregnant women, and is not indicated for use in females of reproductive potential. Based on mechanism of action, EVISTA may block the important functions that estrogen has during all stages of pregnancy. Limited data with EVISTA use in pregnant women are insufficient to inform any drug associated risks for births defects or miscarriage.

In rabbits and rats dosed during organogenesis or during gestation and lactation, EVISTA produced multiple adverse reproductive and developmental effects, including abortion; fetal anomalies; and delayed or disrupted parturition leading to maternal and neonatal mortality, at doses less than or similar to the maximum recommended human dose (based on human body surface area comparison). Data Animal Data In the developmental and reproductive toxicity studies conducted with EVISTA, numerous adverse effects were observed in multiple animal species. In rabbits dosed during organogenesis, abortion and a low rate of fetal heart anomalies (ventricular septal defects) occurred at doses ≥0.1 mg/kg (≥0.04 times the human dose based on surface area, mg/m 2 ).

In rats dosed during organogenesis, retardation of fetal growth and developmental abnormalities (wavy ribs, kidney cavitation) occurred at doses ≥1 mg/kg (≥0.2 times the human dose based on surface area, mg/m 2 ). Treatment of rats during gestation and lactation with doses of 0.1 to 10 mg/kg (0.02 to 1.6 times the human dose based on surface area, mg/m 2 ) produced effects that included delayed and disrupted parturition, decreased neonatal survival and altered physical development, sex- and age-specific reductions in growth and changes in pituitary hormone content, and decreased lymphoid compartment size in offspring. At 10 mg/kg, the disruption of parturition resulted in maternal and progeny morbidity and death.

Effects in adult offspring (4 months of age) included uterine hypoplasia and reduced fertility; however, no ovarian or vaginal pathology was observed.

Pediatric Use of Evista

Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.

Contraindications for Evista

Venous Thromboembolism EVISTA is contraindicated in women with active or past history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and retinal vein thrombosis.

Pregnancy EVISTA is contraindicated for use in pregnancy, as it may cause fetal harm.

Overdosage Information for Evista

In an 8-week study of 63 postmenopausal women, a dose of raloxifene hydrochloride (HCl) 600 mg/day was safely tolerated. In clinical trials, no raloxifene overdose has been reported. In postmarketing spontaneous reports, raloxifene overdose has been reported very rarely (less than 1 out of 10,000 patients treated).

The highest overdose has been approximately 1.5 grams. No fatalities associated with raloxifene overdose have been reported. Adverse reactions were reported in approximately half of the adults who took ≥180 mg raloxifene HCl and included leg cramps and dizziness.

Two 18-month-old children each ingested raloxifene HCl 180 mg. In these two children, symptoms reported included ataxia, dizziness, vomiting, rash, diarrhea, tremor, and flushing, as well as elevation in alkaline phosphatase. There is no specific antidote for raloxifene.

Clinical Studies of Evista

Clinical Trials Experience Because clinical studies are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. Osteoporosis Treatment Clinical Trial (MORE) — The safety of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis was assessed in a large (7705 patients) multinational, placebo-controlled trial. The incidence of all-cause mortality was similar among groups: mg women died.

Therapy was discontinued due to an adverse reaction in 10.9% of EVISTA-treated women and 8.8% of placebo-treated women. Venous Thromboembolism: The most serious adverse reaction related to EVISTA was VTE (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and retinal vein thrombosis). Common adverse reactions considered to be related to EVISTA therapy were hot flashes and leg cramps.

Hot flashes occurred in about one in 10 patients on EVISTA and were most commonly reported during the first 6 months of treatment and were not different from placebo thereafter. Leg cramps occurred in about one in 14 patients on EVISTA. Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Prevention Clinical Trials — The safety of raloxifene has been assessed primarily in 12 Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies with placebo, estrogen, and estrogen-progestin therapy control groups.

The duration of treatment ranged from 2 to 0 mg/day. Discontinuation rates due to hot flashes did not differ significantly between EVISTA and placebo groups (1.7% and 2.2%, respectively). Hot flashes occurred in about one in four patients on EVISTA versus about one in six on placebo.

The first occurrence of hot flashes was most commonly reported during the first 6 months of treatment. Table 1 lists adverse reactions occurring in either the osteoporosis treatment or in five prevention placebo-controlled clinical trials at a frequency ≥2.0% in either group and in more EVISTA-treated women than in placebo-treated women. Adverse reactions are shown without attribution of causality.

The majority of adverse reactions occurring during the studies were mild and generally did not require discontinuation of therapy. Table 1: Adverse Reactions Occurring in Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Clinical Trials at a Frequency ≥ was compared with estrogen-progestin therapy in three clinical trials for prevention of osteoporosis. Table 2 shows adverse reactions occurring more frequently in one treatment group and at an incidence ≥2.0% in any group.

Table 2: Adverse Reactions Reported in the Clinical Trials for Osteoporosis Prevention with EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) and Continuous Combined or Cyclic Estrogen Plus Progestin (Hormone Therapy) at an Incidence ≥ — Across all placebo-controlled trials, EVISTA was indistinguishable from placebo with regard to frequency and severity of breast pain and tenderness. EVISTA was associated with less breast pain and tenderness than reported by women receiving estrogens with or without added progestin. Gynecologic Cancers — EVISTA-treated and placebo-treated groups had similar incidences of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer.

Placebo-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Major Coronary Events (RUTH) — The safety of EVISTA (60 mg once daily) was assessed in a placebo-controlled multinational trial of 10,101 postmenopausal women (age range 55-92) with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or multiple CHD risk factors. Median study drug exposure was 5.1 years for both treatment groups. The incidence per year of all-cause mortality was similar between the raloxifene (2.07%) and placebo (2.25%) groups.

Tamoxifen-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer (STAR) — The safety of years in a randomized, double-blind trial. As of 31 December 2005, the median follow-up was 4.3 years. The safety profile of raloxifene was similar to that in the placebo-controlled raloxifene trials.

Table 1: Adverse Reactions Occurring in Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Clinical Trials at a Frequency ≥2.0% and in More EVISTA-Treated (60 mg Once Daily) Women than Placebo-Treated Women a
a A: Placebo incidence greater than or equal to EVISTA incidence; B: Less than 2% incidence and more frequent with EVISTA.
b Includes only patients with an intact uterus: Prevention Trials: EVISTA, n=354, Placebo, n=364; Treatment Trial: EVISTA, n=1948, Placebo, n=1999.
c Actual terms most frequently referred to endometrial fluid.
TreatmentPrevention
EVISTA (N=2557) %Placebo (N=2576) %EVISTA (N=581) %Placebo (N=584) %
Body as a Whole
InfectionAA15.114.6
Flu Syndrome13.511.414.613.5
Headache9.28.5AA
Leg Cramps7.03.75.91.9
Chest PainAA4.03.6
Fever3.93.83.12.6
Cardiovascular System
Hot Flashes9.76.424.618.3
MigraineAA2.42.1
Syncope2.32.1BB
Varicose Vein2.21.5AA
Digestive System
Nausea8.37.88.88.6
Diarrhea7.26.9AA
DyspepsiaAA5.95.8
Vomiting4.84.33.43.3
FlatulenceAA3.12.4
Gastrointestinal DisorderAA3.32.1
GastroenteritisBB2.62.1
Metabolic and Nutritional
Weight GainAA8.86.8
Peripheral Edema5.24.43.31.9
Musculoskeletal System
Arthralgia15.514.010.710.1
MyalgiaAA7.76.2
ArthritisAA4.03.6
Tendon Disorder3.63.1AA
Nervous System
DepressionAA6.46.0
InsomniaAA5.54.3
Vertigo4.13.7AA
Neuralgia2.41.9BB
Hypesthesia2.12.0BB
Respiratory System
Sinusitis7.97.510.36.5
Rhinitis10.210.1AA
Bronchitis9.58.6AA
Pharyngitis5.35.17.67.2
Cough Increased9.39.26.05.7
PneumoniaAA2.61.5
LaryngitisBB2.21.4
Skin and Appendages
RashAA5.53.8
Sweating2.52.03.11.7
Special Senses
Conjunctivitis2.21.7AA
Urogenital System
VaginitisAA4.33.6
Urinary Tract InfectionAA4.03.9
Cystitis4.64.53.33.1
LeukorrheaAA3.31.7
Uterine Disorder b, c3.32.3AA
Endometrial Disorder bBB3.11.9
Vaginal Hemorrhage2.52.4AA
Urinary Tract Disorder2.52.1AA
Table 2: Adverse Reactions Reported in the Clinical Trials for Osteoporosis Prevention with EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) and Continuous Combined or Cyclic Estrogen Plus Progestin (Hormone Therapy) at an Incidence ≥2.0% in any Treatment Group a
a These data are from both blinded and open-label studies.
b Continuous Combined Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate.
c Cyclic Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens for 28 days with concomitant 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate or 0.15 mg norgestrel on Days 1 through 14 or 17 through 28.
d Includes only patients with an intact uterus: EVISTA, n=290; Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined, n=67; Hormone Therapy-Cyclic, n=217.
EVISTA (N=317) %Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined b (N=96) %Hormone Therapy-Cyclic c (N=219) %
Urogenital
Breast Pain4.437.529.7
Vaginal Bleeding d6.264.288.5
Digestive
Flatulence1.612.56.4
Cardiovascular
Hot Flashes28.73.15.9
Body as a Whole
Infection11.006.8
Abdominal Pain6.610.418.7
Chest Pain2.800.5
Table 4: Effect of EVISTA on Risk of Vertebral Fractures
a Includes all patients with baseline and at least one follow-up radiograph.
Number of PatientsAbsolute Risk Reduction (ARR)Relative Risk Reduction (95% CI)
EVISTAPlacebo
Fractures diagnosed radiographically
Patients with no baseline fracture an=1401n=1457
Number (%) of patients with ≥1 new vertebral fracture27 (1.9%)62 (4.3%)2.4%55% (29%, 71%)
Patients with ≥1 baseline fracture an=858n=835
Number (%) of patients with ≥1 new vertebral fracture121 (14.1%)169 (20.2%)6.1%30% (14%, 44%)
Symptomatic vertebral fractures
All randomized patientsn=2557n=2576
Number (%) of patients with ≥1 new clinical (painful) vertebral fracture47 (1.8%)81 (3.1%)1.3%41% (17%, 59%)
Table 5: EVISTA- (60 mg Once Daily) Related Increases in BMD a for the Osteoporosis Treatment Study Expressed as Mean Percentage Increase vs. Placebo b, c
a Note: all BMD increases were significant (p<0.001).
b Intent-to-treat analysis; last observation carried forward.
c All patients received calcium and vitamin D.
d ND = not done (total body and radius BMD were measured only at 24 months).
SiteTime
12 Months %24 Months %36 Months %
Lumbar Spine2.02.62.6
Femoral Neck1.31.92.1
Ultradistal RadiusND d2.2ND d
Distal RadiusND d0.9ND d
Total BodyND d1.1ND d
Table 6: EVISTA- (60 mg Once Daily) Related Increases in BMD a for the Three Osteoporosis Prevention Studies Expressed as Mean Percentage Increase vs. Placebo b at 24 Months c
a Note: all BMD increases were significant (p≤0.001).
b All patients received calcium.
c Intent-to-treat analysis; last observation carried forward.
d Abbreviations: NA = North American, EU = European, INT = International.
e All women in the study had previously undergone hysterectomy.
SiteStudy
NA d %EU d %INT d, e %
Total Hip2.02.41.3
Femoral Neck2.12.51.6
Trochanter2.22.71.3
Intertrochanter2.32.41.3
Lumbar Spine2.02.41.8
Table 7: EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) vs. Placebo on Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis
a CORE was a follow-up study conducted in a subset of 4011 postmenopausal women who originally enrolled in MORE. Women were not re-randomized; the treatment assignment from MORE was carried forward to this study. At CORE enrollment, the EVISTA group included 2725 total patients with 1355 patients who were originally assigned to raloxifene HCl 60 mg once daily and 1370 patients who were originally assigned to raloxifene HCl 120 mg at MORE randomization.
b Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; HR = hazard ratio; IR = annual incidence rate per 1000 women; N/A = not applicable.
c Included 1274 patients in placebo and 2716 patients in EVISTA who were not diagnosed with breast cancer prior to CORE enrollment.
d p<0.05, obtained from the log-rank test, and not adjusted for multiple comparisons in MORE.
e All cases were ductal carcinoma in situ.
f Only patients with an intact uterus were included (MORE: placebo = 1999, EVISTA = 1950; CORE: placebo = 1008, EVISTA = 2138).
OutcomesMORE 4 yearsCORE a 4 years
Placebo (N=2576)EVISTA (N=2557)HR (95% CI) bPlacebo (N=1286)EVISTA (N=2725)HR (95% CI) b
nIR bnIR bnIR bnIR b
Invasive c breast cancer384.36111.260.29 (0.15, 0.56) d205.41192.430.44 (0.24, 0.83) d
ER b, c positive293.3360.690.20 (0.08, 0.49)154.05121.540.37 (0.17, 0.79)
ER b, c negative40.4650.571.23 (0.33, 4.60)30.8160.770.95 (0.24, 3.79)
ER b, c unknown50.5700.00N/A b20.5410.13N/A b
Noninvasive c, e breast cancer50.5730.340.59 (0.14, 2.47)20.5450.641.18 (0.23, 6.07)
Clinical vertebral fractures10712.27627.080.57 (0.42, 0.78)N/A bN/A bN/A bN/A bN/A b
Death364.13232.630.63 (0.38, 1.07)297.76475.990.77 (0.49, 1.23)
Death due to stroke60.6930.340.49 (0.12, 1.98)10.2760.762.87 (0.35, 23.80)
Stroke566.42434.910.76 (0.51, 1.14)143.75496.241.67 (0.92, 3.03)
Deep vein thrombosis80.92202.282.50 (1.10, 5.68)41.07172.172.03 (0.68, 6.03)
Pulmonary embolism40.46111.262.76 (0.88, 8.67)00.0091.15N/A b
Endometrial and uterine cancer f50.7450.741.01 (0.29, 3.49)31.0240.650.64 (0.14, 2.85)
Ovarian cancer60.6930.340.49 (0.12, 1.95)20.5420.250.47 (0.07, 3.36)
Hot flashes15117.3123727.061.61 (1.31, 1.97)112.94263.311.12 (0.55, 2.27)
Peripheral edema13415.3616418.731.23 (0.98, 1.54)308.03617.770.96 (0.62, 1.49)
Cholelithiasis455.16536.051.18 (0.79, 1.75)123.21354.461.39 (0.72, 2.67)
Table 8: EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) vs. Placebo on Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Major Coronary Events
a Note: There were a total of 76 breast cancer cases in the placebo group and 52 in the EVISTA group. For two cases, one in each treatment group, invasive status was unknown.
b Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; ER = estrogen receptor; HR = hazard ratio; IR = annual incidence rate per 1000 women.
c p<0.05, obtained from the log-rank test, after adjusting for the co-primary endpoint of major coronary events.
d All cases were ductal carcinoma in situ.
e Only patients with an intact uterus were included (placebo = 3882, EVISTA = 3900).
f Only patients with at least one ovary were included (placebo = 4606, EVISTA = 4559).
g Only patients with an intact gallbladder at baseline were included (placebo = 4111, EVISTA = 4144).
OutcomesPlacebo a (N=5057)EVISTA a (N=5044)HR (95% CI) b
nIR bnIR b
Invasive breast cancer702.66401.500.56 (0.38, 0.83) c
ER b positive552.09250.940.45 (0.28, 0.72)
ER b negative90.34130.491.44 (0.61, 3.36)
ER b unknown60.2320.070.33 (0.07, 1.63)
Noninvasive d breast cancer50.19110.412.17 (0.75, 6.24)
Clinical vertebral fractures973.70642.400.65 (0.47, 0.89)
Death59522.4555420.680.92 (0.82, 1.03)
Death due to stroke391.47592.201.49 (1.00, 2.24)
Stroke2248.602499.461.10 (0.92, 1.32)
Deep vein thrombosis471.78652.441.37 (0.94, 1.99)
Pulmonary embolism240.91361.351.49 (0.89, 2.49)
Endometrial and uterine cancer e170.83211.011.21 (0.64 - 2.30)
Ovarian cancer f100.41170.701.69 (0.78, 3.70)
Hot flashes2419.0939714.821.68 (1.43, 1.97)
Peripheral edema58322.0070626.361.22 (1.09, 1.36)
Cholelithiasis g1316.201687.831.26 (1.01, 1.59)
Table 9: EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) vs. Tamoxifen (20 mg Once Daily) on Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer
a Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ; ER = estrogen receptor; IR = annual incidence rate per 1000 women; LCIS = lobular carcinoma in situ; RR = risk ratio for women in the EVISTA group compared with those in the tamoxifen group.
b Of the 60 noninvasive breast cases in the tamoxifen group, 5 were mixed types. Of the 83 noninvasive breast cancers in the raloxifene group, 7 were mixed types.
c Only patients with an intact uterus at baseline were included (tamoxifen = 4739, EVISTA = 4715).
d Only patients with at least one intact ovary at baseline were included (tamoxifen = 6813, EVISTA = 6787).
e Defined as myocardial infarction, severe angina, or acute ischemic syndromes.
f Only patients who were free of cataracts at baseline were included (tamoxifen = 8342, EVISTA = 8333).
g Peripheral edema events are included in the term edema.
OutcomesEVISTA (N=9751)Tamoxifen (N=9736)RR (95% CI) a
nIR anIR a
Invasive breast cancer1734.401684.301.02 (0.82, 1.27)
ER a positive1152.931203.070.95 (0.73, 1.24)
ER a negative521.32461.181.12 (0.74, 1.71)
ER a unknown60.1520.052.98 (0.53, 30.21)
Noninvasive breast cancer b832.12601.541.38 (0.98, 1.95)
DCIS a471.20320.821.46 (0.91, 2.37)
LCIS a290.74230.591.26 (0.70, 2.27)
Uterine cancer c231.21371.990.61 (0.34, 1.05)
Endometrial hyperplasia c170.901005.420.17 (0.09, 0.28)
Hysterectomy c924.8424613.250.37 (0.28, 0.47)
Ovarian cancer d180.66140.521.27 (0.60, 2.76)
Ischemic heart disease e1383.501253.191.10 (0.86, 1.41)
Stroke541.36561.420.96 (0.65, 1.42)
Deep vein thrombosis671.69922.350.72 (0.52, 1.00)
Pulmonary embolism380.96581.470.65 (0.42, 1.00)
Clinical vertebral fractures581.46581.470.99 (0.68, 1.46)
Cataracts f34310.3443513.190.78 (0.68, 0.91)
Cataract surgery f2407.172958.850.81 (0.68, 0.96)
Death1042.621092.760.95 (0.72, 1.25)
Edema g74118.6666416.831.11 (1.00, 1.23)
Hot flashes6748169.917170181.710.94 (0.90, 0.97)

Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.

Ready to save on Evista?

Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.

Compare Evista Prices