Evista Drug Information
Generic name: RALOXIFENE HYDROCHLORIDE
Uses of Evista
Treatment and Prevention of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
EVISTA is indicated for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women .
Reduction in the Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women with
Osteoporosis EVISTA is indicated for the reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis .
Reduction in the Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women at
High Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer EVISTA is indicated for the reduction in risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women at high risk of invasive breast cancer . The effect in the reduction in the incidence of breast cancer was shown in a study of postmenopausal women at high risk for breast cancer with a 5-year planned duration with a median follow-up of 4.3 years . Twenty-seven percent of the participants received drug for 5 years. The long-term effects and the recommended length of treatment are not known. High risk of breast cancer is defined as at least one breast biopsy showing lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) or atypical hyperplasia, one or more first-degree relatives with breast cancer, or a 5-year predicted risk of breast cancer ≥1.66% (based on the modified Gail model). Among the factors included in the modified Gail model are the following: current age, number of first-degree relatives with breast cancer, number of breast biopsies, age at menarche, nulliparity or age of first live birth.
Healthcare professionals can obtain a Gail Model Risk Assessment Tool by dialing 1-800-545-5979. Currently, no single clinical finding or test result can quantify risk of breast cancer with certainty. After an assessment of the risk of developing breast cancer, the decision regarding therapy with EVISTA should be based upon an individual assessment of the benefits and risks. EVISTA does not eliminate the risk of breast cancer.
Patients should have breast exams and mammograms before starting EVISTA and should continue regular breast exams and mammograms in keeping with good medical practice after beginning treatment with EVISTA. Important Limitations of Use for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction There are no data available regarding the effect of EVISTA on invasive breast cancer incidence in women with inherited mutations (BRCA1, BRCA2) to be able to make specific recommendations on the effectiveness of EVISTA. EVISTA is not indicated for the treatment of invasive breast cancer or reduction of the risk of recurrence. EVISTA is not indicated for the reduction in the risk of noninvasive breast cancer.
Dosage & Administration of Evista
Recommended Dosing
The recommended dosage is one 60 mg EVISTA (raloxifene hydrochloride tablets) tablet daily, which may be administered any time of day without regard to meals . For the indications in risk of invasive breast cancer the optimum duration of treatment is not known .
Recommendations for Calcium and Vitamin D Supplementation For either osteoporosis treatment or
prevention, supplemental calcium and/or vitamin D should be added to the diet if daily intake is inadequate. Postmenopausal women require an average of 1500 mg/day of elemental calcium. Total daily intake of calcium above 1500 mg has not demonstrated additional bone benefits while daily intake above 2000 mg has been associated with increased risk of adverse effects, including hypercalcemia and kidney stones.
The recommended intake of vitamin D is 400-800 IU daily. Patients at increased risk for vitamin D insufficiency (e.g., over the age of 70 years, nursing home bound, or chronically ill) may need additional vitamin D supplements. Patients with gastrointestinal malabsorption syndromes may require higher doses of vitamin D supplementation and measurement of 25-hydroxyvitamin D should be considered.
Side Effects of Evista
Clinical Trials Experience
Because clinical studies are conducted under widely varying conditions, adverse reaction rates observed in the clinical trials of a drug cannot be directly compared to rates in the clinical trials of another drug and may not reflect the rates observed in practice. The data described below reflect exposure to EVISTA in 8429 patients who were enrolled in placebo-controlled trials, including 6666 exposed for 1 year and 5685 for at least 3 years. Osteoporosis Treatment Clinical Trial (MORE) — The safety of raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis was assessed in a large (7705 patients) multinational, placebo-controlled trial.
Duration of treatment was 36 months, and 5129 postmenopausal women were exposed to raloxifene hydrochloride (2557 received 60 mg/day, and 2572 received 120 mg/day). The incidence of all-cause mortality was similar among groups: 23 (0.9%) placebo, 13 (0.5%) EVISTA-treated (raloxifene HCl 60 mg), and 28 (1.1%) raloxifene HCl 120 mg women died. Therapy was discontinued due to an adverse reaction in 10.9% of EVISTA-treated women and 8.8% of placebo-treated women. Venous Thromboembolism : The most serious adverse reaction related to EVISTA was VTE (deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and retinal vein thrombosis). During an average of study-drug exposure of 2.6 years, VTE occurred in about 1 out of 100 patients treated with EVISTA. Twenty-six EVISTA-treated women had a VTE compared to 11 placebo-treated women, the hazard ratio was 2.4 (95% confidence interval, 1.2, 4.5), and the highest VTE risk was during the initial months of treatment.
Common adverse reactions considered to be related to EVISTA therapy were hot flashes and leg cramps. Hot flashes occurred in about one in 10 patients on EVISTA and were most commonly reported during the first 6 months of treatment and were not different from placebo thereafter. Leg cramps occurred in about one in 14 patients on EVISTA. Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Prevention Clinical Trials — The safety of raloxifene has been assessed primarily in 12 Phase 2 and Phase 3 studies with placebo, estrogen, and estrogen-progestin therapy control groups.
The duration of treatment ranged from 2 to 30 months, and 2036 women were exposed to raloxifene HCl (371 patients received 10 to 50 mg/day, 828 received 60 mg/day, and 837 received from 120 to 600 mg/day). Therapy was discontinued due to an adverse reaction in 11.4% of 581 EVISTA-treated women and 12.2% of 584 placebo-treated women. Discontinuation rates due to hot flashes did not differ significantly between EVISTA and placebo groups (1.7% and 2.2%, respectively). Common adverse reactions considered to be drug-related were hot flashes and leg cramps. Hot flashes occurred in about one in four patients on EVISTA versus about one in six on placebo.
The first occurrence of hot flashes was most commonly reported during the first 6 months of treatment. Table 1 lists adverse reactions occurring in either the osteoporosis treatment or in five prevention placebo-controlled clinical trials at a frequency ≥2.0% in either group and in more EVISTA-treated women than in placebo-treated women. Adverse reactions are shown without attribution of causality.
The majority of adverse reactions occurring during the studies were mild and generally did not require discontinuation of therapy. Table 1: Adverse Reactions Occurring in Placebo-Controlled Osteoporosis Clinical Trials at a Frequency ≥2.0% and in More EVISTA-Treated (60 mg Once Daily) Women than Placebo-Treated Women a a A: Placebo incidence greater than or equal to EVISTA incidence; B: Less than 2% incidence and more frequent with EVISTA. b Includes only patients with an intact uterus: Prevention Trials: EVISTA, n=354, Placebo, n=364; Treatment Trial: EVISTA, n=1948, Placebo, n=1999. c Actual terms most frequently referred to endometrial fluid. Treatment Prevention EVISTA (N=2557) % Placebo (N=2576) % EVISTA (N=581) % Placebo (N=584) % Body as a Whole Infection A A 15.1
Flu Syndrome 13.5 11.4 14.6 13.5 Headache 9.2 8.5
A A Leg Cramps 7.0 3.7 5.9
Chest Pain
A A 4.0
Migraine
A A 2.4
Syncope 2.3 2.1 B B Varicose Vein 2.2 1.5
A A Digestive System Nausea 8.3 7.8 8.8
Diarrhea 7.2 6.9
A A Dyspepsia A A 5.9
Vomiting 4.8 4.3 3.4 3.3 Flatulence
A A 3.1
Gastrointestinal Disorder
A A 3.3
Gastroenteritis B B 2.6 2.1 Metabolic and Nutritional Weight Gain
A A 8.8
Myalgia
A A 7.7
Arthritis
A A 4.0
Tendon Disorder 3.6 3.1
A A Nervous System Depression A A 6.4
Insomnia
A A 5.5
Vertigo 4.1 3.7
A A Neuralgia 2.4
B B Hypesthesia 2.1 2.0 B B Respiratory System Sinusitis 7.9 7.5
10.3
Rhinitis 10.2 10.1
A A Bronchitis 9.5
A
A Pharyngitis 5.3 5.1 7.6
Cough Increased 9.3 9.2 6.0 5.7 Pneumonia
A A 2.6
Laryngitis B B 2.2 1.4 Skin and Appendages Rash
A A 5.5
Sweating 2.5 2.0 3.1 1.7 Special Senses Conjunctivitis 2.2 1.7
A A Urogenital System Vaginitis A A 4.3
Urinary Tract Infection
A A 4.0
Cystitis 4.6 4.5 3.3 3.1 Leukorrhea
A A 3.3
Uterine Disorder b, c 3.3 2.3
A A Endometrial Disorder b B B 3.1
Vaginal Hemorrhage 2.5 2.4
A A Urinary Tract Disorder 2.5
A
A Comparison of EVISTA and Hormone Therapy — EVISTA was compared with estrogen-progestin therapy in three clinical trials for prevention of osteoporosis. Table 2 shows adverse reactions occurring more frequently in one treatment group and at an incidence ≥2.0% in any group. Adverse reactions are shown without attribution of causality.
Table 2: Adverse Reactions Reported in the Clinical Trials for Osteoporosis Prevention with EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) and Continuous Combined or Cyclic Estrogen Plus Progestin (Hormone Therapy) at an Incidence ≥2.0% in any Treatment Group a a These data are from both blinded and open-label studies. b Continuous Combined Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate. c Cyclic Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens for 28 days with concomitant 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate or 0.15 mg norgestrel on Days 1 through 14 or 17 through 28. d Includes only patients with an intact uterus: EVISTA, n=290; Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined, n=67; Hormone Therapy-Cyclic, n=217. EVISTA (N=317) % Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined b (N=96) % Hormone Therapy-Cyclic c (N=219) % Urogenital Breast Pain 4.4 37.5
Vaginal Bleeding d 6.2 64.2 88.5 Digestive Flatulence 1.6 12.5 6.4 Cardiovascular
Hot Flashes 28.7 3.1
Chest Pain 2.8 0 0.5 Breast Pain — Across all placebo-controlled trials
EVISTA was indistinguishable from placebo with regard to frequency and severity of breast pain and tenderness. EVISTA was associated with less breast pain and tenderness than reported by women receiving estrogens with or without added progestin. Gynecologic Cancers — EVISTA-treated and placebo-treated groups had similar incidences of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer.
Placebo-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Major Coronary Events (RUTH) — The safety of EVISTA (60 mg once daily) was assessed in a placebo-controlled multinational trial of 10,101 postmenopausal women (age range 55-92) with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or multiple CHD risk factors. Median study drug exposure was 5.1 years for both treatment groups . Therapy was discontinued due to an adverse reaction in 25% of 5044 EVISTA-treated women and 24% of 5057 placebo-treated women. The incidence per year of all-cause mortality was similar between the raloxifene (2.07%) and placebo (2.25%) groups.
Adverse reactions reported more frequently in EVISTA-treated women than in placebo-treated women included peripheral edema (14.1% raloxifene versus 11.7% placebo), muscle spasms/leg cramps (12.1% raloxifene versus 8.3% placebo), hot flashes (7.8% raloxifene versus 4.7% placebo), venous thromboembolic events (2.0% raloxifene versus 1.4% placebo), and cholelithiasis (3.3% raloxifene versus 2.6% placebo) . Tamoxifen-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer (STAR) — The safety of EVISTA 60 mg/day versus tamoxifen 20 mg/day over 5 years was assessed in 19,747 postmenopausal women (age range 35-83 years) in a randomized, double-blind trial. As of 31 December 2005, the median follow-up was 4.3 years. The safety profile of raloxifene was similar to that in the placebo-controlled raloxifene trials .
Postmarketing Experience
Because these reactions are reported voluntarily from a population of uncertain size, it is not always possible to reliably estimate their frequency or establish a causal relationship to drug exposure. Adverse reactions reported very rarely since market introduction include retinal vein occlusion, stroke, and death associated with venous thromboembolism (VTE).
Warnings & Cautions for Evista
Venous Thromboembolism
In clinical trials, EVISTA-treated women had an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism). Other venous thromboembolic events also could occur. A less serious event, superficial thrombophlebitis, also has been reported more frequently with EVISTA than with placebo. The greatest risk for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism occurs during the first 4 months of treatment, and the magnitude of risk appears to be similar to the reported risk associated with use of hormone therapy.
Because immobilization increases the risk for venous thromboembolic events independent of therapy, EVISTA should be discontinued at least 72 hours prior to and during prolonged immobilization (e.g., post-surgical recovery, prolonged bed rest), and EVISTA therapy should be resumed only after the patient is fully ambulatory. In addition, women taking EVISTA should be advised to move about periodically during prolonged travel. The risk-benefit balance should be considered in women at risk of thromboembolic disease for other reasons, such as congestive heart failure, superficial thrombophlebitis, and active malignancy .
Death Due to Stroke
In a clinical trial of postmenopausal women with documented coronary heart disease or at increased risk for coronary events, an increased risk of death due to stroke was observed after treatment with EVISTA. During an average follow-up of 5.6 years, 59 (1.2%) EVISTA-treated women died due to a stroke compared to 39 (0.8%) placebo-treated women (22 versus 15 per 10,000 women-years; hazard ratio 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-2.24; p=0.0499). There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups in the incidence of stroke (249 in EVISTA versus 224 placebo ). EVISTA had no significant effect on all-cause mortality. The risk-benefit balance should be considered in women at risk for stroke, such as prior stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), atrial fibrillation, hypertension, or cigarette smoking .
Cardiovascular Disease
EVISTA should not be used for the primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. In a clinical trial of postmenopausal women with documented coronary heart disease or at increased risk for coronary events, no cardiovascular benefit was demonstrated after treatment with raloxifene for 5 years .
Premenopausal Use
There is no indication for premenopausal use of EVISTA. Safety of EVISTA in premenopausal women has not been established and its use is not recommended. Additionally, there is concern regarding inadvertent drug exposure in pregnancy in women of reproductive potential who become pregnant, due to risk of fetal harm .
Hepatic Impairment
EVISTA should be used with caution in patients with hepatic impairment. Safety and efficacy have not been established in patients with hepatic impairment .
Concomitant Estrogen Therapy
The safety of concomitant use of EVISTA with systemic estrogens has not been established and its use is not recommended.
History of Hypertriglyceridemia when Treated with Estrogens Limited clinical data suggest that
some women with a history of marked hypertriglyceridemia (>5.6 mmol/L or >500 mg/dL) in response to treatment with oral estrogen or estrogen plus progestin may develop increased levels of triglycerides when treated with EVISTA. Women with this medical history should have serum triglycerides monitored when taking EVISTA.
Renal Impairment
EVISTA should be used with caution in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment. Safety and efficacy have not been established in patients with moderate or severe renal impairment .
History of Breast Cancer
EVISTA has not been adequately studied in women with a prior history of breast cancer. 5.10 Use in Men There is no indication for the use of EVISTA in men. EVISTA has not been adequately studied in men and its use is not recommended. 5.11 Unexplained Uterine Bleeding Any unexplained uterine bleeding should be investigated as clinically indicated. EVISTA-treated and placebo-treated groups had similar incidences of endometrial proliferation . 5.12 Breast Abnormalities Any unexplained breast abnormality occurring during EVISTA therapy should be investigated.
EVISTA does not eliminate the risk of breast cancer .
Drug Interactions with Evista
Cholestyramine
Concomitant administration of cholestyramine with EVISTA is not recommended. Although not specifically studied, it is anticipated that other anion exchange resins would have a similar effect. EVISTA should not be co-administered with other anion exchange resins .
Warfarin
If EVISTA is given concomitantly with warfarin or other warfarin derivatives, prothrombin time should be monitored more closely when starting or stopping therapy with EVISTA .
Other Highly Protein-Bound Drugs
EVISTA should be used with caution with certain other highly protein-bound drugs such as diazepam, diazoxide, and lidocaine. Although not examined, EVISTA might affect the protein binding of other drugs. Raloxifene is more than 95% bound to plasma proteins .
Systemic Estrogens
The safety of concomitant use of EVISTA with systemic estrogens has not been established and its use is not recommended.
Other
Concomitant Medications EVISTA can be concomitantly administered with ampicillin, amoxicillin, antacids, corticosteroids, and digoxin . The concomitant use of EVISTA and lipid-lowering agents has not been studied.
Pregnancy Safety for Evista
Pregnancy Risk Summary EVISTA is contraindicated for use in pregnant women, and is not indicated for use in females of reproductive potential. Based on mechanism of action, EVISTA may block the important functions that estrogen has during all stages of pregnancy . Limited data with EVISTA use in pregnant women are insufficient to inform any drug associated risks for births defects or miscarriage. In rabbits and rats dosed during organogenesis or during gestation and lactation, EVISTA produced multiple adverse reproductive and developmental effects, including abortion; fetal anomalies; and delayed or disrupted parturition leading to maternal and neonatal mortality, at doses less than or similar to the maximum recommended human dose (based on human body surface area comparison). Data Animal Data In the developmental and reproductive toxicity studies conducted with EVISTA, numerous adverse effects were observed in multiple animal species.
In rabbits dosed during organogenesis, abortion and a low rate of fetal heart anomalies (ventricular septal defects) occurred at doses ≥0.1 mg/kg (≥0.04 times the human dose based on surface area, mg/m 2 ). In rats dosed during organogenesis, retardation of fetal growth and developmental abnormalities (wavy ribs, kidney cavitation) occurred at doses ≥1 mg/kg (≥0.2 times the human dose based on surface area, mg/m 2 ). Treatment of rats during gestation and lactation with doses of 0.1 to 10 mg/kg (0.02 to 1.6 times the human dose based on surface area, mg/m 2 ) produced effects that included delayed and disrupted parturition, decreased neonatal survival and altered physical development, sex- and age-specific reductions in growth and changes in pituitary hormone content, and decreased lymphoid compartment size in offspring. At 10 mg/kg, the disruption of parturition resulted in maternal and progeny morbidity and death. Effects in adult offspring (4 months of age) included uterine hypoplasia and reduced fertility; however, no ovarian or vaginal pathology was observed.
Pediatric Use of Evista
Pediatric Use Safety and effectiveness in pediatric patients have not been established.
Contraindications for Evista
Venous Thromboembolism
EVISTA is contraindicated in women with active or past history of venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and retinal vein thrombosis .
Pregnancy
EVISTA is contraindicated for use in pregnancy, as it may cause fetal harm .
Overdosage Information for Evista
In an 8-week study of 63 postmenopausal women, a dose of raloxifene hydrochloride (HCl) 600 mg/day was safely tolerated. In clinical trials, no raloxifene overdose has been reported. In postmarketing spontaneous reports, raloxifene overdose has been reported very rarely (less than 1 out of 10,000 patients treated). The highest overdose has been approximately 1.5 grams.
No fatalities associated with raloxifene overdose have been reported. Adverse reactions were reported in approximately half of the adults who took ≥180 mg raloxifene HCl and included leg cramps and dizziness. Two 18-month-old children each ingested raloxifene HCl 180 mg.
In these two children, symptoms reported included ataxia, dizziness, vomiting, rash, diarrhea, tremor, and flushing, as well as elevation in alkaline phosphatase. There is no specific antidote for raloxifene. No mortality was seen after a single oral dose in rats or mice at 5000 mg/kg (810 times the human dose for rats and 405 times the human dose for mice based on surface area, mg/m 2 ) or in monkeys at 1000 mg/kg (80 times the AUC in humans).
Clinical Studies of Evista
Flu Syndrome 13.5 11.4 14.6 13.5 Headache 9.2 8.5
A A Leg Cramps 7.0 3.7 5.9
Chest Pain
A A 4.0
Migraine
A A 2.4
Syncope 2.3 2.1 B B Varicose Vein 2.2 1.5
A A Digestive System Nausea 8.3 7.8 8.8
Diarrhea 7.2 6.9
A A Dyspepsia A A 5.9
Vomiting 4.8 4.3 3.4 3.3 Flatulence
A A 3.1
Gastrointestinal Disorder
A A 3.3
Gastroenteritis B B 2.6 2.1 Metabolic and Nutritional Weight Gain
A A 8.8
Myalgia
A A 7.7
Arthritis
A A 4.0
Tendon Disorder 3.6 3.1
A A Nervous System Depression A A 6.4
Insomnia
A A 5.5
Vertigo 4.1 3.7
A A Neuralgia 2.4
B B Hypesthesia 2.1 2.0 B B Respiratory System Sinusitis 7.9 7.5
10.3
Rhinitis 10.2 10.1
A A Bronchitis 9.5
A
A Pharyngitis 5.3 5.1 7.6
Cough Increased 9.3 9.2 6.0 5.7 Pneumonia
A A 2.6
Laryngitis B B 2.2 1.4 Skin and Appendages Rash
A A 5.5
Sweating 2.5 2.0 3.1 1.7 Special Senses Conjunctivitis 2.2 1.7
A A Urogenital System Vaginitis A A 4.3
Urinary Tract Infection
A A 4.0
Cystitis 4.6 4.5 3.3 3.1 Leukorrhea
A A 3.3
Uterine Disorder b, c 3.3 2.3
A A Endometrial Disorder b B B 3.1
Vaginal Hemorrhage 2.5 2.4
A A Urinary Tract Disorder 2.5
A
A Comparison of EVISTA and Hormone Therapy — EVISTA was compared with estrogen-progestin therapy in three clinical trials for prevention of osteoporosis. Table 2 shows adverse reactions occurring more frequently in one treatment group and at an incidence ≥2.0% in any group. Adverse reactions are shown without attribution of causality.
Table 2: Adverse Reactions Reported in the Clinical Trials for Osteoporosis Prevention with EVISTA (60 mg Once Daily) and Continuous Combined or Cyclic Estrogen Plus Progestin (Hormone Therapy) at an Incidence ≥2.0% in any Treatment Group a a These data are from both blinded and open-label studies. b Continuous Combined Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens plus 2.5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate. c Cyclic Hormone Therapy = 0.625 mg conjugated estrogens for 28 days with concomitant 5 mg medroxyprogesterone acetate or 0.15 mg norgestrel on Days 1 through 14 or 17 through 28. d Includes only patients with an intact uterus: EVISTA, n=290; Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined, n=67; Hormone Therapy-Cyclic, n=217. EVISTA (N=317) % Hormone Therapy-Continuous Combined b (N=96) % Hormone Therapy-Cyclic c (N=219) % Urogenital Breast Pain 4.4 37.5
Vaginal Bleeding d 6.2 64.2 88.5 Digestive Flatulence 1.6 12.5 6.4 Cardiovascular
Hot Flashes 28.7 3.1
Chest Pain 2.8 0 0.5 Breast Pain — Across all placebo-controlled trials
EVISTA was indistinguishable from placebo with regard to frequency and severity of breast pain and tenderness. EVISTA was associated with less breast pain and tenderness than reported by women receiving estrogens with or without added progestin. Gynecologic Cancers — EVISTA-treated and placebo-treated groups had similar incidences of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer.
Placebo-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Major Coronary Events (RUTH) — The safety of EVISTA (60 mg once daily) was assessed in a placebo-controlled multinational trial of 10,101 postmenopausal women (age range 55-92) with documented coronary heart disease (CHD) or multiple CHD risk factors. Median study drug exposure was 5.1 years for both treatment groups . Therapy was discontinued due to an adverse reaction in 25% of 5044 EVISTA-treated women and 24% of 5057 placebo-treated women. The incidence per year of all-cause mortality was similar between the raloxifene (2.07%) and placebo (2.25%) groups.
Adverse reactions reported more frequently in EVISTA-treated women than in placebo-treated women included peripheral edema (14.1% raloxifene versus 11.7% placebo), muscle spasms/leg cramps (12.1% raloxifene versus 8.3% placebo), hot flashes (7.8% raloxifene versus 4.7% placebo), venous thromboembolic events (2.0% raloxifene versus 1.4% placebo), and cholelithiasis (3.3% raloxifene versus 2.6% placebo) . Tamoxifen-Controlled Trial of Postmenopausal Women at Increased Risk for Invasive Breast Cancer (STAR) — The safety of EVISTA 60 mg/day versus tamoxifen 20 mg/day over 5 years was assessed in 19,747 postmenopausal women (age range 35-83 years) in a randomized, double-blind trial. As of 31 December 2005, the median follow-up was 4.3 years. The safety profile of raloxifene was similar to that in the placebo-controlled raloxifene trials .
Drug information sourced from the FDA. This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Consult a healthcare professional before making any medication decisions.
Ready to save on Evista?
Compare prescription prices at over 70,000 pharmacies and start saving today—no enrollment required.
Compare Evista Prices